The Pope, Speaking for the Catholics of the world say "GAY SEX?...In a Pigs Ass!"

Chimeras? Jeeeeez.

I miss haloscan. Sorry.

This is what happens when the "lesser known candidates" who the media intentionally shut out, get more exposure.

http://www.covenantwithblackamerica.com/

Look at the before and after results.

That's why the media tries to ignore John Edwards unless his name is associated with some manufactured scandal, and why they ignore Kucinich and Gravel. Edwards is an attractive, electable candidate, and Gravel and Kucinich are truth speakers. Both qualities are appealing to people, so the media shut them out in their incessant pushing of Obama and Clinton.

Why?

Because when they get exposure, their support increases.

"Piglets with human blood flowing in their veins". Um, don't we have that already? It's a chimera called a Rove.

naschkatze @ 7:

"Piglets with human blood flowing in their veins". Um, don't we have that already? It's a chimera called a Rove.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

More than 100 ethnic groups and 40 religions co-exist peacefully in Kazakhstan – a model for how to deal with secular and religious differences

Finally, a site in which nothing could be off-topic.

...but....but.....but, I can't think of anything to say.

Impeach? F*** the Pope? More cheaper dope for seniors? SiCKO sets BO records? Just as Bush proved ANYONE can be president, C&L proves ANYONE can post? Isn't 'stupid neocon' as redundant as 'lying republican'? 'Health Care' is un-american, hell, 'america' is un-american? The way things are going, the hell with 'keeping the lights on', it's better if we do what we're doing in the dark? How is the Vatican going to determine which of all those sheep it is building the pens for are 'straight'? The straight news is that the rapture has already happened, the folks we're dealing with are the 'Left Behind'?

jkb @ 14:

Gay sex bad? Animal sex good? .....well, I always wanted to have a three-way with Mary and her little lamb.

Better be with mint jelly instead of KY Jelly.

OT - something happened on Fox News this morning... and you want to make a bet they will come back and say that it's evidence that liberal/progressives want to shut down the conservative media

from huffpo http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/06/29/thief-tries-to-nab-report_n_543...

video http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2esk5_fox-news

(a recovering linkaholic who is now on the John Amato 12-step program)

Hey man, you holding?

;-)

(Must - get - blog - fix - )

Posting the link about Catholics and bestiality is irresponsible. I love C&L, but this is one of those things that could run me off. Please be more careful about how you portray things. The Church is not okay with bestiality and you know that.

Interesting. Were you intentionally trying to say that the pope endorsed beastiality? Or were you just trying to be misleading? "Human-animal hybrid embryos conceived in the laboratory" It's quite a leap to get from test tube inception to beastiality.

I don't beleive the Church is endorsing the creation of "chimeras," (in fact it clearly would be stridently opposed to the practice). It's position is that once created, they should not be killed. It's analagous to the Church's position on abortion; the fact that it opposes abortion in the case of pregnancy resulting from rape or incest does not constitute endorsement of either rape or incest.

Lose the intentionally ignorant and gratuitous anti-Catholic schtick, it's demeans both you and your readers.

The idea that the RC (the church not the cola) endorses beastility is not such a leap when you compare endorsing women gestating an animal/human hybrid and the church's view that the bumpty-bump is for procreation not recreation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhSc8qVMjKM

Now we know why Elsie, the Borden Milk cow, is so contented.

Coultergeist being her insane self on Scarborough:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIW3mpGY4sU&mode=related&search=

What a shrieking devil!

Too bad we overly sensitive folks are not as sharp and intelligent as you, Cerniq.

The headline was obviously inflammatory, but the intent of posting it here was not.

Hi Lauren,

When the Catholic Church stops their inflammatory teaching that my religion (Wicca) is connected to Satan-worship, I'll care about my accidental and tiny pinpricks to their ego. Until then, isn't there something about casting first stones that's relevant here?

As Bill Hicks might say, if you don't like what I've said then forgive me.

Regards, C

Chesire11 @ 25:

I don't beleive the Church is endorsing the creation of "chimeras"

God schmod, I want my monkey-man!

Cernig @ 38:

P.S. Big Wave to Rusty Shackleford from the Jawa Report! He must be finding out how the other half 74% live.

Thanks for the wave but I'm not him/her. That son/daughter-of-a-bitch stole my pseudonym, which I stole from King of the Hill. There's also a Rusty B. Shakleford who posts here. Confusing!

The Catholic supporters have a point. It's difficult, let alone pointless, to parody a parody.

Attacking or insulting the Catholic church would be comparable to me hauling in my life-size cardboard cut-out of George Bush from it's normal position of 75-100 yards, where I plink at it with a .306, to a distance of ten feet, and blasting it with a Mossburg over-and-under.

I mean, the 'Pope's infallibility', the 'priests penchant for pederastic pedophilia', the heirarchy's obsession with denial and secrecy and obfuscation, the criminal financial manipulations, the corporate drive for self-survival, 'Uber Alles'?!

And all of this under the direction and benign approval, of an omniscient, omnipotent 'Creator and Master of The Universe'?!

Puhleeeeze! They're too deeply sunk into their delusions to prod with reality or reason, except as a sport, comparable to setting cats on fire. And, as cruel as that analogy might seem, it pales with respect to the historical and everyday depredations of Mother Church.

Give me a break. Over-sensitive? Clearly the sensitivity is with you, Cernig, since you have an issue with the Catholic Church. Point to me where the Catholic Church says Wicca amounts to Satan-worship? I doubt you'll find it in the Catechism.

My point was simply this: The headline was irresponsible when you consider that C&L is a major liberal blog site. If we want liberals to be taken seriously, then maybe we shouldn't resort to Drudge-like taglines.

I was not offended by the post, just thought it irresponsible.

[...] do! For those who don’t know, Cernig at Crooks & Liars mentioned the above named post on their Blog Roundup yesterday. When I woke up this morning, instead of the usual 40-50 hits I normally get in a day [...]

Cerniq, I'm always open to forgiveness, so don't worry about that. I agree, there's a lot of not cool stuff that comes from Catholicism. But that is true about EVERYTHING. There is so much to disagree with in all religions, I don't go around slamming Mormons or Pentacostals or Muslims and blatantly incensing people on what is a very touchy subject. I know when I hear a derogatory remark come from a Muslim leader about women that that is not what all Muslims think. I also know they'd be pissed if I said something offensive. If people get offended because we talk about beliefs themselves, that's their issue. But I can certainly understand why folks get offended when they see their religion being misrepresented in a flippant way. It's one thing to talk about disagreeing with beliefs, that's to be expected. It's another to be blatantly inflammatory about something like this animal business or what have you. Of course any blogger has the right to say whatever they want, but folks are sensitive about their moral beliefs, period, as a layperson I don't see any benefit in casting stones around on either side. btw, got no problem here with the wiccans. : )