DC Madam Calls For Senator Vitter To Be Prosecuted
By Logan Murphy Tuesday Jul 10, 2007 12:12pm
Via Time:
When Sen. David Vitter of Louisiana confessed to "a very serious sin" on Monday night, Debra Jean Palfrey was not about to forgive him. Sin is one thing; but Palfrey believes Vitter — a proponent of the "sanctity of marriage" — should fess up if that sin was a crime as well. [..]"Why am I the only person being prosecuted?" she told TIME over the phone. "Sen. Vitter should be prosecuted [if he broke the law]" Read more...
Apparently, Vitter has a thing for ladies of the night. It's ok though, he's received forgiveness from his wife and God and claims he's not going to discuss the matter publicly. The problem is, he doesn't work for his wife or God, he works for the citizens of Louisiana and the entire country in the U.S. Senate...you know, the public? Howie asks when Vitter will resign, and I think it's time for Patrick Leahy and Harry Reid to look into the Senator's behavior...








Login or Register to post comments.
I wonder...
Was he a Vitter pill to swallow?
Gore's son gets in trouble and it's a nation national tragedy worthy of endless news coverage. A reich-winger gets in trouble and the MSM doesn't have the right to cover this story.
I'm a jerk for being gleeful.
/Louisiana resident
//Loony Lefty
///Tee hee hee!
Vitter is a Christian in disguise....
Leahy and Reid, fine. But what about the DC police? We have a confession of a crime committed and a corroborating witness. I say, book 'im Danno!
Preemptive Clintsession:
Clinton gets a blowjob legally and they want to impeach him. This guy is hiring prostitutes and we all must forgive him because his god has? Me sees a double standard here.
Hey, listen up.
He talked to GAWD, and GAWD forgave him.
Done deal.
And, hopefully HIS WIFE talked to GAWD, and She told him, go ahead and cut the lying bastard's dick off and hand it to him!
Justice all around?
Vitter was one of the Clinton attackers based on "moral" grounds. It turns out they were all just jealous. Bill must be chuckling a lot when he reads the newspaper these days.
Hey, hey HEY! Time Out! The guy's a Republican, he gets the medal of freedom for getting his rocks off, it's the Dems that get prosecuted for BJs. Got that straghtened out now? Alright then,...continue.
I can just hear God grumbling that he wished Vitter had left him out of this mess.
Reich-wingers have to pay to get sex.....LOL
Any Democrat that seeks prosecution of the Viier creep is a total asshole. Leave this to the court of public opinion or go down as hypocrites..screaming about the injustice suffered by Bill Clinton but going after Vitter. Vitter is toast. He may well finish his term but it will be as a very reduced and wounded man. An action by Democrats will on be what is focused on...taking attention away from the whore monger Vitter.
Just fucking stop all the GOP tactics..its not what we are here for.
Go get him DC prosecutors!! Oh Yeah, they don't work for DC, they work for Gonzo, part of the Justice Department.
No DC Jail for Republicans while the BushCheneyCorp still runs things...
Imeach these bastards.
Just ONCE I'm praying (wink!) one of these pontificating moral scolds gets taped while he's having his kink-on with the hookers....
And, it gets cycled ALL over the net, just how filthy these repressed bible-belting clowns are....
Probably be a contest, to see if he's screaming about JESUS more with the hookers then on the stump with the yokels that elected this clown?
Is she saying Vitter has been a bad...bad boy?
Richard @ 13:
I tried saying this in another post regarding this subject and got called a reich-winger for it. But you are totally correct. Using the same tactics of those you despise makes you no better than those you despise. We have to fight for the HIGHER ground instead of wallowing in the filth of the less than genuine in our Government. That being said, I think the madame does bring up a good point when she asks "Why am I the only one being prosecuted" shouldn't Vitter, and the prostitute that answered the call be subject to the law also?
Well Senator, your wife may have forgiven you but I understand God is po'ed. She doesn't like adulterers. And I believe the punishment as prescribed in that bible you're choking on is being stoned to death.
Republicans are just bitter that they have to pay for sex. Democrats get it for free.
Repubs:
Haggard
Vitter
Dems:
Clinton
Villiagrosa (LA mayor)
On YouTube, Vitter's speech on the sanctity of marriage.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9mKY80Amqk
Did anyone else hear that Larry Flynt is holding a press conference later today to name names?
Mrs. Vitter:
Cut off his dick and sell it on EBay.
Injustices of Clinton... he was impeached after receiving consensual legal sex from a consenting adult. But going after Vitter... who broke the law by hiring a prostitute. One was legal and got in trouble. One was illegal and you want him to skate. PLEASE explain your logic to me.
Distraction. "Look there's another shiny new penny!" (not to coin a phrase... )
It is heartening to see the RW's and MSM willing to hang out one of their own to deflect attention from more important
membersmatters, but I don't know that RW sexual hypocrisy is anything new or striking (has Ted Haggard been cured yet?), at least not striking enough to work as a successful diversion. Still, the rats appear to be drowning their own.Yes, they should. So why are you advocating that Vitter should be left alone?
From what I understand there are plenty of lobbyists willing to set this type of thing up for "free" without anyone being able to trace it like they have with Vitter. Aside from the hypocrisy, Vitter was stupid not to have had a lobbyist provide it for him.
So I guess his wife isn't going to take her Bobbet Prize
I'm sorry, folks. Richard is correct.
I don't care how many holes into which he sticks his mantool. It's of no business of mine, even if he paid money to do it.
As an atheist, I don't follow the guidelines of any religion, and therefore, don't give a damn whether he cheated on his wife once or a hundred times, either with other humans or turtles, or swans, or cows, or caterpillars, etc.
To me, what he did is not a justifiable reason to resign. It may be hypocritical, yes, but it's not criminal.
Well, it is, I guess, but it should not be.
I like that D.C. Madame
Not ready to make nice and mad as hell
Vitter Va-Va-Voom
23 stonicus:
As I stated on an earlier thread, although what Clinton did, did not qualify as sex, as per Paula Jones lawyers's definition, both pre-marital and extramarital affairs are illegal in some states. I'm not sure about Arkansas and Washington DC (especially the latter since it's a District and not a state.)
That being said most states with such laws don't prosecute, but leave them as grounds for divorce in civil court. If they enforced such laws we would indubitably have congressional sessions in the rec area of the local penitentiary.
Dahgrostab'ph-r-i @ 27:
Lack of tweezers?
But... but... but.... Debra Jean Palfrey is God. So how can he say God has forgiven him???
I'm not asking for him to resign, just give him the same punishment that you or I would receive if we went and hired a hooker. Doesn't matter how we feel about the law... I think prostitution should be legal... but it isn't. Until then, it's not a bad thing to expect our lawmakers to actually follow the law. "Do as I say not as I do" is not acceptable policy for my government to have.
This is more than just "had an affair". He hired a hooker. That's illegal, isn't it?
The problem with the court of public opinion is the concentration of the news in fewer and fewer hands that wish to peddle infotainment. This story hasn't even been mentioned in the Dallas Morning Nudes yet. How can opinion form on a subject so thinly distributed?
Nancy Pelosi should take some lessons from Natalie Maines, Cindy Sheehan
and Debra Jean Palfrey about how to deal with Bush and these cons.
Herbert @ 4:
why is a christian doing wrong a 'christian in disguise?' Given the number of 'christians' in prison, looks to be a christian just being a christian.
stonicus @ 35:
As I said earlier on another post, at least there's SOMETHING else going on to keep us from dealing with the reality of a THIRD destroyer being sent to the Persian Gulf.
Sex sells.
I have a letter to Vitter posted on my blog. My friend at "True or Better" blog sent it to him. It's not even on his blog yet, so this is an exclusive, so to speak.
I hope this isn't considered blog-whoring/pimping, as it is relevant to the topic.
I predict one day someone is gonna stand up and say, "Hey, time out everyone!!!! Do any of you actually believe this bible bullshit? No?? Good, let's stop pretending."
In order to be consistent, David Vitter had to vote against premature withdrawal from Iraq, after such a very expensive penetration. Madam Cheney's rates are far steeper that Madam Palfrey's.
How about the Irony in the name of the DC Madam: Palfrey is hardly the case. It cost Vitter three hundred an hour for his Free Pal. Far too costly for to engage in premature withdrawal. I bet Christo Fascist Vitter made sure to stay the course.
...
fiver @ 32:
Should we all send her some? via his Senate office.
This is more than just “had an affair”. He hired a hooker. That’s illegal, isn’t it?
It’s prosecutable. They do still enforce prostitution laws.
I'm still trying to get used to this format.
stonicus @ 25:
I don't know if Vitter should be left alone totally. I'm just very aware of the GOP's tactics, and the overall stupidity of alot of our voting citizenry. If progressives choose to spend any time or political capital to hunt this down, I think we come off looking like as big of hypocrites as the GOP'ers tend to look. I understand prostitution is illegal. I get that. I understand that this guy broke the law and that he is a hypocrite for throwing Gay marriages under a bus while he was throwing his own matrimony under another bus. But this is an issue that should be handled by a D.A. and his family. IF he is found guilty of a crime, then I will welcome any and all calls for this guy to be removed but until then everything is still up in the air. In one of your posts you made the distinction between this guy and Clinton. Clinton wasn't impeached for the BJ, he was impeached for telling lies to a grand jury about the BJ. Idiotic and certainly not a high crime or misdemeanor to be sure, but I heard my fellow Dems saying things like "This was about sex WHO CARES?!?!" Well so is this Vitter stuff. It is about sex and right or wrong the political Right will point to the rabidness of the Left regarding this guy as proof of our own hypocrisy and you know what? The less than intelligent voters in our country who are just looking for a reason to bail on the Dems will flip back to voting for the Repubs based on the hypocrisy and frankly, we can't afford to lose the next presidential election. Certainly not for looking like hypocrites for some pisant who cannot get laid for free. If we lose the election because of our stance on the war, fine. If we lose it based on our stance on poverty, fine. But losing it because we look like hypocrites to the not-so-smart? No thank you.
I think part of the problem is people are confusing immorality with illegality. It's a common mistake made by sanctimonious addle-pates.
Yes, it is illegal. Yes it is prosecutable.
Clinton's prosecution was based on morality.
Vitter's potential pending prosecution is, and should be, based on the letter of the law.
ysbaddaden @ 31:
I don't see a problem with that. And it seems to me it would save the taxpayers a lot of money.
He should be tested for STDs and the results published online and in newspapers to ward the public from the threat of a sick, twisted, freak that spends all his time and family's money lying with disease-ridden whores.
Put Vitter in the stocks!
Convict him!
[deleted]
I thought whores were tight lipped about their customers.
Rude Pundit - rudepundit.blogspot.com - posted funny commentary on the Vitter case yesterday. But I'll warn you: It was rude.
Vitter, even after his ignominious admission ( which he never would have made on his own until forced by the release of the phone records ) , is being celebrated as an ' amnesty ' - killer hero by nativist bloggers, talk show hosts and that bastard - Pat Buchanan. These sons of bitches couldn't forgive poor immigrants for jumping the border to make a decent living doing thankless jobs but they have no scruples about defending a shameless hypocrite like Vitter. I tell you what - his loudmouth ' Bobbitt ' wife will forgive him too. These pigs are all cut from the same stinking cloth.
Orwell's Illegitimate Son @ 28:
I agree with you in principle, but you can't discount the fact that the man is a lawmaker.
I'm also an atheist, and I also believe that it shouldn't be criminal... but the man has had the chance in his political career to at least voice an opinion on the matter and do or say something that mirrored that sentiment. Instead, the man has campaigned and earned his job by painting himself as some sort of moral authority... that flies in the face of who he claims to be, and as a lawmaker, he should be expected to resign for breaking the law.
I'll say the same thing about any Democratic Senator that may or may not wind up on that same list, or admit to committing any criminal acts while holding elected office (Vitter was a Representative while this was taking place).
So while I agree with you on a certain philosophical level, I disagree with you because of the legality involved and the job he holds (and held) while he was doing the nasty-by-the-hour. When it comes to our lawmakers breaking the law, especially when they position themselves politically as Vitter did, I think they should all be held to a higher standard.
Has the wife said anything bout her "lorena bobbit" line when she took that shot at Hillary during the Monica wars?
She inserted herself in the morality wars back then, I think she should be called on it now?
Come on Honey, you were SOOO ballsy back then, what now?
I got some nice sharp scissors in case you needs them....
Is Vitter a Eunich?
If not, his wife is all talk and no action.
OK, this one isn't at the top of my list of scandals, but I will say this: Pope John Paul forgave his would-be assassin, but the dude as forgiven as he was, still had to pay the time for his crime.
I think the criminalisation of prostitution is bullshit. I don't think he should be prosecuted-nor should anyone else.
His wife, however, threatened to harm a US Senator. There's someone who I would like to see visited with criminal charges.
OxyCon @ 55:
Maybe she's NO Talk and NO action...
That's why he was getting his Kink on with the hookers?
stonicus @ 42:
I do hope this happens soon.
L.A. Confidential @ 37:
You're right - Debra Jean Palfrey is the most skilled of them. But Pelosi's main problem is Steny Hoyer (financed by financial and pharma sectors to the tune of 78%, as in millions; he's the author and 'deliverer' of the new bankruptcy code/law protecting crooks of Enron, but mercilessly pulverizing the little guys, practically making filing impossible), Rahm Emanuel (dual citizen of the US and Israel, with his loyalties to a foreign entity:stronger preznit or any leader is NOT what he wants - the weaker they are, the eaasier for his masters to manipilate/ buy them: keep checking next Hillary's list online with her arse sizes for diff pants she needs others to buy for her, so she wouldn't be naked in her Chapaqua house also bought by the 'friends', while she eats on plates and with cutlery also from her online list, bought by another 'friend' w/ dough), no-action Harry (Reid), and the rest of her own supposedly team (uuhhm -w..house).
Any other dem leader would be facing the same - which dem faction is s/he a part of.
It's hard to be a Madam when dem girlie-boys do not wish to put out. Even when it counts so much.
Be very afraid of your wife Sen. Vitter. She has told the world she would cut off you member! Yikes!
I totally agree with that. I don't think Congress needs to do it. The local DA for the area in which the crime took place should file charges.
Yeah lets see that piece of crap being loaded into a police car with his shirt untucked and a half boner.
Right on man!!!
Throw the book at his ass!!!
jk @ 50:
Usually, but this was just too Vitter A Pill to swallow!. Bad pun intended.
...
miss_kitty @ 57:
:D
PNAAC Minister @ 9:
Yeah, I said the same thing during the Clinton impeachment hearings... they were all jealous that Monica wasn't interested in smoking their cigars so they went after Clinton... and Monica still was only interested in Bill's cigars and not theirs. Poor little boys.
I think the point that people are missing when they argue Vittner shouldn't be prosecuted is that the Madam is being prosecuted. Why should he be shielded from prosecutions when she is going to go to prison for the same act, the same transaction?
Comparing this to Clinton is spurious at best. Clinton lied in a civil lawsuit, whether he committed a crime or not is hardly a foregone conclusion. Vittner committed a crime (maybe even a felony depending on the statutes in DC) to which he has admitted to. He should lose his job and face the justice system (which will probably just fine him).
I think people who try to apply the toughest laws and who hold themselves up as moral crusaders should bear the full brunt of the policies and attitudes that they implement. If Dick Durbin was caught with the madam, the Republicans would be calling for him to step down.
I also think the entire Madam list should be released. The press should be trying to find out who is on that list, no matter if they are a D or R. Lawmakers shouldn't fill free to escape the laws and punishments (both through the justice system and via shame) that all regular citizens must face.
In the state where I grew up at one point they were posting the pictures of johns who had been arrested and convicted on a public website. Why shouldn't these lawmakers face the retribution they so swiftly and moralistically dish out?
The concern from some in this thread is really mind melting.
Vitter committed a crime.
He hired a prostitute.
It is a crime to do so in DC.
Sure, he is also morally bankrupt and a hypocrite as well - seeing as how he, just like Newt Gingrich, could not help but be the loudest admonishers of the Clenis when he committed adultery - even though they were also committing adultery.
However, a legal blowjob versus paying a hooker for sex?
And you concerned ones really, truly can't understand the difference?
Again, my mind is melted daily by the amazingly under-developed thought processes of so many of my fellow Americans.
No wonder America is a wasteland.
#17 re:higher ground LOL
That doesn't work in today's politics. All Republicans must be treated as 'enemy combatants'. these people are ruthless and if you ever hope to bring them to justice and save the citizenry, then you are required make them accountable for each and every act of malfeasance or misconduct they commit.
I feel no guilt at all in pointing out double standards and lawlessness among the opposition party as, I am sure, they feel no hesitation to do likewise should the opportunity arise. I should not be made to feel guilty or unseemly simply because I publicize HIS bad behavior.
The 'high road' is about taking back America from the stranglehold of warmongers, religious zealots, and corporate shills.
Actually Bill Clinton wasn't prosecuted for "lies" to the Grand Jury. That was taped. Where he was accused of lying was in the deposition, where using Paula Jones's lawyers's definition of sex, he said she may have had sex with me, but I didn't with her. The lawyers gave a very specific definition of what sex is, but didn't include her mouth. Also before the whole impeachment nonsense he admitted to an improper relationship, but didn't bother to elaborate.
Where people might be confused is he gave interviews where he denied having sex with that woman, but these were not under oath, and he was continuing a lawyer's trick, contact with a mouth isn't sex per the definition given him. Therefore he could be accused of lying, but that's not perjury, and the interview questions were over his personal life. Then it becomes fair game. Republicans raised sex as a campaign issue as a "character" issue so therefore they opened themselves up to counter-charges of like nature.
That being said, during a typical discovery process lawyers on both sides agree on what the will or will not talk about during trial, unless the defendant brings it up while testifying on his own behalf.
The imperfect definition Paula Jones's lawyers gave for sex was in reference to Monica.
"Republicans raised sex as a campaign issue as a “character” issue so therefore they opened themselves up to counter-charges of like nature."
Yeah, did anyone catch Tucker on CNN trying to defend this clown, claiming all the Abstinence and family values crap he spews DOESN'T leave him open to the hypocrite charge?
The logic was so tortured, it would have been banned even in Gitmo....
That being said, during a typical discovery process lawyers on both sides agree on what the will or will not talk about during trial, unless the defendant brings it up while testifying on his own behalf. Then it becomes fair game. Republicans raised sex as a campaign issue as a "character" issue so therefore they opened themselves up to counter-charges of like nature.
I don't know what's happening today, but sentences I type in one order come out another, and I didn't have that much to drink last night.
Anti-BabyBoomer(and Coulter) @ 17:
So we should bring a knife to a gun fight? These are the people who got appointed by yelling "the rule of law". Why shouldn't he be prosecuted under DC's "John " Laws. If he had been soliciting prostitutes on the street he would be.
Shlomo @ 69:
'Atta Boy... I agree with the enemy combatants statement but any good general(I know, we haven't seen one of those in a long time) knows how to pick their battles. This is a battle that hasn't truly been waged yet. What if a DA decides to prosecute and he is acquitted? All of that time will be wasted. If he is convicted, then we won because the right thing was done without us being the judge jury and executioner. Again, my sentiments only speak to the fact that if we have a congressional battle over this, it will take away from more pressing issues. I would be all for congressional pressure on a DA to pursue but I want my Reps/Senators working on things like ending the war first and foremost. Well written reponse though.. Very thought provoking.
nitehawk @ 74:
I doubt Congress will do anything about Vitter, their target is boosh. Vitter will likely be handled by a criminal court, unless he pulls some kiind of fast one (something the hooker probably complained about too.)
Outside of court, this will likely figure into his reelection campaign.
If enough Repubs are exposed by this scandal, and not too many Democrats, the latter may gain enough seats to pass laws and override vetos without the other side's help like required now.
However, in the meantime why shouldn't blogs talk about this? He exposed himself to this abuse, why deny him?
It's like Repugs say when people are concerned about Gitmo torture, "What's a little torture, it's not so bad...them bad guys would chop your head off!"
Anyone else getting tired of this old... It wasn't me or I'm forgiven crap?! What a pile of smelly bull$hit!!
Vitter... why is the Madame the only one being prosecuted? Excellent question... how about an answer?
:lol:oops... there goes his pecker!Who cares if he resigns? When will he be turned into a eunuch by his wife?
ysbaddaden @ 77:
I can find no fault in this reasoning.. I certainly hope no matter what, that the people of LA. don't support this clown for re-election after this. But that might be a moot point if dude is cooling his heels in jail. I don't claim to be an attorney, nor do I play one on TV(yet) but it seems like prosecution of prostitution would be a hard case to prove with just a phone number list. Vitter opening his trap might have hurt him but if I were his defense attorney and all they had was this list and the nebulous statement about "sin" I would take the case in a heartbeat. I thank goodness that I am not an attorney in cases like this.
I keep flashing back to these lines in "O Brother Where Art Thou"
You may be even square with the Lord, but Mississippi's more hard-nosed.
Every time one mentions his name, it should be preceded by "whoremonger".
"a man consorting with whores or given to lechery"
So it is appropriately Whoremonger Vitter. Or Senator Whoremonger Vitter if you like. Anything else is spin.
If you ever want to write to or about Whoremonger Vitter, you should at least know how to address him.
but it seems like prosecution of prostitution would be a hard case to prove with just a phone number list. Vitter opening his trap might have hurt him but if I were his defense attorney and all they had was this list and the nebulous statement about "sin" I would take the case in a heartbeat. I thank goodness that I am not an attorney in cases like this.
how is vitter's peckerdillo not clinton's fault?
probably every one of those poor god fearing, wife loving republicans got unwelcome hard-ons, aroused by having to read monica's titillating testimony.
and then what are you going to do, take it home to your pure wife, the mother of your precious children?
i don't think so, this is a job for a professional [or a dirty hippy girl like bobo wrote about yesterday] to handle.
ysbaddaden @ 84:
I tried to stop this before it went out without my comments. Phones numbers might be insufficient, and even his admission of sin might become inadmissable.
However, this should give pause to those who support data mining and other unConstitutional acts that many of them supported.
How about this?
http://thetyee.ca/News/2007/04/23/Feldmar/
That is an article about a Vancouver doctor who is now banned form the US because of an article he published about his drug use, drug use from 30 years ago with none since. He is seen as a threat and a drug abuser by US customs because of his admitted drug use. Here we have another admitted criminal, earning our tax dollars. A respected doctor will never be allowed in the US again (he was never arrested nor convicted by the way) for admitting to breaking the law. A senator/criminal still gets $165,200 of our dollars every year.
Vitter, you are a SCHMUCK of the HIGHEST ORDER! Resign and go home to your wife and bury your face in her pussy until you are blue in the face! Then, come out and support gay marriage and show your true colors!
Orwell's Illegitimate Son @ 1:
Class
The Patriot Act is akin to fascism. The United States is an authoritarian regime and we are seeing the end of democratic freedoms, make no mistake about it.
No W Now @ 87:
Greig Byrne @ 89:
DC Madam Calls For Senator Vitter To Be Prostituted.
fatigued @ 21:
When and where please?
I believe that as long as the law is in place, the man should be prosecuted.
As much as I respect the opinions of folks like Miss Kitty, I respect the rule of law a bit more. I would be fine if the punishment were lenient (a fine), but he should almost certainly step down.
Larry Flynt, I thought he was dead!? Is he?
Why wasn't that list published? Yesterday there was a website up (that was swamped)...somewhere the metallic sound of sweating bullets, heh-heh.
There once was a senator named Vitter,
On eBay he was Jeff Gannon’s high-bidder,
gay—says he ain’t,
but the foul smell of his taint,
is from shoving hotdogs up his shitter.
Vitter looks like an idiot - however - what does it fucking matter if he likes to frequent ladies of the night unless it reflects somehow on his job performance? If he broke the law - I guess that's another story...but this law...it could stir some action to change laws that have to do with somebody's religious beliefs.
Someone sharpen the knife for his plucky little wife. The DC Madam strikes 1 for good.
DC Madam. DC Madam. DC Madam. DC Madam. DC Madam. DC Madam. DC Madam.
IgnoranceIsNotBliss @ 93:
Fabulous. Summer entertainment. Let the games begin. And here I though it might get dull: just "new surge" talk ad nauseum. (I think Bush wants to bore people into submission.)
I saw an op-ed, by Larry Flint, after Falwell (that fat unholy fucker) croaked. Obviously, he's alive and well. (Yeah, had to take another swing at Fartwell. He deserves it!!!!!)
I would like to point out, in all fairness, that no underage congressional pageboys were harmed in the creation of this latest republican scandal.
Huh? This can't be a true story! A Republican man who likes having sex with ladies...?
Vitter...the new Santorum.
I am so glad I helped send Ricky to the curb last year!
Will Senator Vitter ask for "amnesty" for himself if he committed a legal offense?
Senator Vitter is familiar with that word as he used it so many times to kill the immigration compromise in the Senate last month.
What does it matter what Clinton did? What does it matter what A. t. Hun or A. t. Great did? Or Einstein or Momma Teresa or My Uncle Chuck? Or if my dog shits on the carpet? What does it matter who Vitter works for? Or who his wife, father, grand uncle or favorite color is? What does it matter what the filthy little senator has in his pocketeses? What does it matter if god or his wife or the Reich Wing cool-aid mixer forgives him? What does it matter if the Bereft Wing Nuts think he's a hypocritical bastard (this one is true, tho)? What does it matter if prostitution is immoral, amoral or better with coke? What does it matter that I'm typing this in the nude with SpongeBob SquarePants on the TeeVee while I eat Pringles with hot sauce?
Nothing.
What does matter is:
1) Prostitution is illegal
2) There is evidence that he hired prostitutes.
3) And he made what I imagine is a non-legally binding confession.
If this guy wasn't a politician, given the evidence, he'd be in jail, assumed innocent of course, and awaiting trial just like any other john, junkie, whore, gang member, rapist, etc. But it's all moot. King W has just begun selling indulgences... I mean commutations and pardons. But even if KW doesn't do anything, the perverse concept of smaller penalties for people with more power will ensure that the worst he'll get will be from his wife. But I'm sure his book will sell well.
I'm guessing Tony "Mouth of Sauron" Snow's explanation will go something like this:
"Vitter, like Scooter, is a hero. He was f*ing them there so they wouldn't follow him home."
(Tsk... f*ing can mean fighting, too.)
Now, let's imagine that this guy is not a member of the Bu'ush party. How would W spin this?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
God has this list, see, and it says what we shouldn't do if we don't wanna be evil doers. And this here guy broke some of these rules. Lemme splain somma these rules, 'cos I'm also the edumactor-in-chief. Ah hear thars about 10 of 'em or so.
#4: Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy[1]
Now see, Sabbath is Jew for Sunday. And if he went a'whorin' on Sunday, then that's eviler than whorin' Monday through Saturday. Sunday's fer churchin', footballin' and brush clearin'. Day names sure are funny. Ah cain't even spell Wensday. Heh. Karl says it's named after a PAGAN god named Wotan, or Wodin or Odin or sumpin'. How come we got a day named after a Pagan god? Oh well, gotta help Laura with the easter egg hunt.
#5: Honor your mommy and daddy[2]
Now, I'm sure this evildoer's mamma wouldn't want him visitin' any hoes, so he sure ain't honorin' her! See, I honored my daddy by killin' the guy who tried to kill him way back when.
#7: Thou shalt not commit adultery
This here's what it is when adults do adult things with other adults who they ain't married to. Heh, heh. Question? No, I don't know what kind of pajamas Condi wears. Why? Another Q? No, I don't know Jeff Gannon's email address. Ask Karl.
#9: Thou shalt not bear false witness[3]
That's fancy talk fer lyin'. And it's evil, see. And people who "do" it are "evil" "doers." Y'all see how that works? Heh, heh. He lied to his god and bride (cuz teknikly they wasn't married yet) at his weddin'. And he lied to y'all citizens when he took his oath of orifice. And then, when he didn't tell nobody about it (till he got caught) he was lyin' by omission. Dunno what that means, but Karl said to say it. Heh, heh.
#10: Don't covet stuff
Karl said that covetin' means:
2. To long for inordinately or unlawfully; to hanker after
(something forbidden).
Ah likes that... hanker after. Heh, heh. And, see, prostitutes is forbidden and he was hankerin' enough to break his weddin' vows and his oath of office, so we can use this un, too.
Now, I'm as compassionate as the next conservative, heh, so I'm all for forgiveness and such. But the other day, Laura was singin' "1 little, 2 little, 3 little indians" to me at nap time (just like Jack Abramoff used to before he had to go away) and I noticed that 6 comes between 5 and 7! Lookin' at Them Ten Commandments[4], I saw that rule 6 was:
THOU SHALT NOT MURDER!!!![5] This here evildoer has done things that are rubbin' elbows with murder in the bibul. We cain't let him go. Dick says there's a 1% chance he could hurt somebody, so we need to do a teeny weeny little regime change. I prolly won't watch him bein' hanged, neither.
Thank you(9/11). It's been great talkin'(9/11) before this fully screened and hand picked supportive audience. I'd also like to thank Fox(9/11)News for the air time(9/11).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If only we could classify paying off politicians to support special interests as prostitution! Now that would be a LONG list of phone numbers!
Notes:
The KJV bible has been amended by the following signing statements:
[1] Clearin' brush ain't work... it's intellectually stimulating fun. I'm always thinkin': where can I put this pile? Which pile of brushes should I get next? Why, sometimes I even think 1 or 2 piles ahead!
[2] I ain't dishonoring my daddy by ignorin' him and only listenin' to the voices in my head.
[3] Tellin' people that Rummy ain't goin' anywhar just before sackin' him ain't lyin'. Neither is sayin' all our wiretaps had warrants before admitting we are doing warrantless wiretaps. Or Iraq did 9/11. Or WMD are in Iraq. Or sayin' "Mission Accomplished." Or [remainder deleted due to bandwidth restrictions]
[4] The word "Commandment" only applies to others. We like to consider this quaint old piece of paper "The Ten Suggestions" when applied to us.
[5] Except for mostly non-white criminals, our soldiers by not giving them armor, rest or equipment, and people in close proximity to "coveted" oil supplies.
The next version of the bible, the King W Version (KWV) will be released in 2009 to commemorate W's 3rd and final term.
In early Nov 2008, voting will be considered quaint. In 10 years it will hardly be missed.
E Pleb Neesta
GODISNOWHERE
Blessed are the cheese makers.
If HPV vaccination promotes promiscuity, then surely confession must promote sin.
Pat Robertson and Jimmy Swaggart have forgiven Senator Vitter. In addition Bush has given him executive privilege.
Yet again... Another holier-than-thou hypocrite fails to practice what he preaches. Defender of the "Sanctity of Marriage" indeed.
Tomorrow, I'm going to call Vitter's office to let him know that God told me to tell him to resign.
Evidently Mz Palfrey can not make the fine distinction which the rest of us make every day,,, That there is a difference between 'being fucked' and 'getting fucked'. Where she and her pro's were in the business of 'being fucked' for pay, she is now seeing how we the amerikan people have been 'getting fucked' for years, By the unaccountable hypocrites who run this country.
Really though, seeing we pay these governmental whores their salary, maybe we should be prosecuted too.
I just wish I could have enjoyed it.
Didn't this Debra Jean Palfrey woman play a gesha girl in some movie that was set in Japan?
I'd swear she was.
Vitter claims God has forgiven him. Isn't that one of the worst sins? Making wrongful use of the Lord's name? So he sins explaining another sin (bearing false witness) that covers up yet another sin (adultery) while he supports sinful administration (murder). That's four commandments violated right there.
I wonder if he was one of the senators who supported placing the ten commandments in public buildings.
The hypocrisy is stunning, almost as bad as Tobias making use of the DC Madam services (and that of the more economic latina brothels) while heading up Bush's Global abstinence programmes.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=009&sspagename=STRK%3AM...
You know for all the wrongs in the world, people here at home, like to focus on things that are just so incredibly stupid its no wonder Americans are thought to be idiots and people are dieing on the street everyday.
The bottom line is, a Politician is doing a job, he is entitled to every single right you are as an American and that entitles him to a right to privacy if he so chooses. Americans and politician have no more right to know about what is going on in vitter's bedroom then they are their neighbors, nor any more right to demand a resignation on the basis of something that is personal.
Why do we focus on stupid incidents, frivolous laws, Flag removal, Monument removal, and all the while we as Americans allow congress and our president to violate our every right as a citizen, the very foundations of our constitution and country.
This article does me think about the pink Bush-photo, see http://zonow.com/104
Dude @ 112:
With all due respect, it is uninformed comments like this that make us appear to be idiots. And poor speling.
Prostitution is a crime. It's illegal. Against the law. Something people who are not politicians go to jail for. This guy swore an oath to uphold the laws of the land. And he has the power to make and change laws. Of course he should have the same rights as everyone else, but he must also take more responsibility and be accountable for his actions because of the power he holds. Sadly, though, the opposite is true: he, as do others in positions of power, has more rights and is less responsible and accountable for his actions than others. Can we go on TeeVee and just apologize for committing a CRIME and have that be the end of it? Or, if it's a really bad crime, like being a pedophile or a rapist, then you may have to *gasp* resign.
No, this is not a matter of right to privacy. Clinton's BJ was a privacy issue.
But you are quite right that this is truly insignificant compared to the rape of the Constitution and the administration's abuse of power.
But if we can bring enough attention to the hypocrisy and truly vile nature of the those in power maybe people will get pissed off enough to do more than bitch to their friends about the current sad state of affairs. And by revealing the true nature of these self-proclaimed moral leaders people may realize just who it is they are voting into power and stop assuming that Republican == moral.
It seems that people are unable to grasp the true significance of what the Bu'ushists have done to our country. Removal of habeas corpus, torture, warrantless spying on American citizens, illegal wars, war crimes, war profiteering on a massive scale. These things are so enormous that they don't seem real. It's more than UBL ever thought he could accomplish. But we can sure wrap our tiny little brain stems around a nice little bit of smut. So we take what we can get. And if a hypocritical, immoral lawbreaking SOB can be removed from office then maybe it can be replaced by a slightly less hypocritical, immoral lawbreaking SOB. Yeah. Right.
E Pleb Neesta
GODISNOWHERE
Blessed are the cheese makers.
If HPV vaccination promotes promiscuity, then surely confession must promote sin.
[...] white) then you’re probably just doing it because you’re “lonely“, so it’s not so bad (as long as you make sure to ask the invisible cloud man for forgiveness!) When Sen. David Vitter of [...]
these assholes don't believe in god
Vitter claims God has forgiven him, so this asshole talks to God
Did she give up shampoo for Lent?
When I found about this whole thing my first thoughts were, so another whore with a list-whats new? Now he's got his previous pimp from his home state defending him. I do however find it most interesting that Vitter has used the same worn out lame excuse as countless other lowlife cheaters. "My wife doesn't pay any attention to me, so I had no other choice than to hire a hooker to have someone to talk to." I have never yet heard any man -regardless of class or job admit the truth; that they just can't keep it in thier pants. The fact that he was elected on his whole family values and sanctity of marriage just compounds the issue.
Well at least he didn't sodomize a teenager in a government office with a cigar, or anything ...
If Monica was a teenager, than I'm a young adult.
Dude@112
While you make a valid point; I think you miss one important thing. If voters had been informed of Vitters proclivities do you think that he would have been elected into office? This is a man who completely misrepresented himself to every person he came in contact with on a professional level. Now his wife and the entire state of Louisiana has been publicly humiliated, because of his lies and indescretions. Our elected officials are SUPPOSED to be the best representative that each state has to offer. From the president down, these are the people that other nations base thier assumptions of the US on. I personally have issue with the fact that other nations think of me as an American with no capability of any other thought besides what's going in between my legs.
Ya know what's really funny is that this asshole was probably one of those guys callin' for Clinton's impeachment cuz he got a BJ. But whoa whoa whoa, when he gets caught, we all have to forgive him because his God has? Yeah, not gonna happen, asswipe. Get outta office while you still have a shred of decency.
The Champ is out.
Decency is reserved for people with decent behavior.
DC Madam Calls For Senator Vitter To Be Prosecuted
[...]When Sen. David Vitter of Louisiana confessed to ?a very serious sin? on Monday night, Debra Jean Palfrey was not about to forgive him. Sin is one thing; but Palfrey believes Vitter ? a proponent of the ?sanctity of marriage? ? should fess up if t...
Richard (#13) says:
"Any Democrat that seeks prosecution of the Viier creep is a total asshole. Leave this to the court of public opinion or go down as hypocrites..screaming about the injustice suffered by Bill Clinton but going after Vitter. Vitter is toast. He may well finish his term but it will be as a very reduced and wounded man. An action by Democrats will on be what is focused on…taking attention away from the whore monger Vitter.
Just fucking stop all the GOP tactics..its not what we are here for."
Legal prosecution of Senator Vitter is the responsibility of law enforcement, not Democrats. The "court of public opinion" is condemning Vitter and will likely see him censured. Beyond that, he may resign when faced with expulsion. Naturally, the Republicans would do anything they could to see to it he stays in office as long as possible.
After having the "holier than thou” Republicans ruin our country with their lies and their hypocrisy, and after their unbridled criminality has finally been exposed to many Americans, this is hardly the time to cry "foul" against Democrats.
Login or Register to post comments.