frist!

Wow. I had heard those Dick quotes before but never seen it on video... Man.

B

Sen. Clinton is rapidly becoming not merely acceptable to many right-wingers but possibly even their candidate of choice.

Just more evidence of what drinking the Kool-aid can do.

i'd like to see that one being aired everyday on US tv until the 08 elections or impeachment begins:)

Where the hell has this been for 5 plus years?

Surveillance is Good for You (TM).

Right.

'UK: Database of Top-Secret Police Phone Taps Stolen'
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article2856892.ece

- ferg

skipping channels tonight…I caught a fauxnews show on “the surge” and what looked like yet another American general “reporting” from Iraq. I don’t remember his exact words but basically he said that we would now be told the truth about whether or not the surge was working and that a positive comment in support of the surge was patriotic and that a negative comment meant that you were working with the terrorists. Dear Lord, I hope that I am not the only one to grasp the full meaning (never mind the sheer contradictory irony) of this and to SEE where their latest propaganda campaign is headed. If we don’t do something fast, we are all about to become America’s version of wwII Germany’s Jews. This is scary, scary stuff, and it cannot be allowed to escalate - it must be “nipped in the bud”, immediately.

Please grab a DVD version of my videos and make sure that all your relatives, your friends, and your neighbors see it - before it's too late. Hurry...grab a copy, while you still can.

http://www.rosecoloredglasses.org

Mitt Romney's "Family Surge"
http://satiricalpolitical.com/?p=980

how rich. It's a commercial that doesn't even need editing. I should be played constantly - maybe for the upcoming 6th anniversary of 9/11. Cowardous chicken-hawks don't want more war until it's their more war.

has anyone else noticed how the cockiness and the boldness of the neocons has returned (to it's former high) now that they know that many democrats are with them and that the democratic party won't stand in their way?

Man oh man, those are my arguments agaianst the war. If I beleive those things today does that mean I will turn into a sociopath like Dick Cheney in 15 years?

We have always been at war with East Asia.

If there's one thing I've learned in the last six years, it's that Orwell was not exaggerating. Reality really is completely malleable to these people. They'll say one thing on Monday, and insist the opposite has always been true on Tuesday. "Reality" is whatever serves their immediate purposes.

I don't expect our corrupt corporate media to note these blatant contradictions and convenient about-faces. The really disheartening thing is that so many regular people seem blind to it.

Here try this instead

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/nm/20070812/2007_08_11t155952_450x321_us...

Well that rules out incompetence.
The admin went in full well knowing what would happen.

> I guess our current Vice President is the evil twin.

In a parallel universe sortof WAY. :-)

Let's see. 1934 and Germany was heading towards Nazi fascism. 2007 and America is heading towards Nazi fascism.

How do you feel now, smike?

Cat Atomic @ 26:

We have always been at war with East Asia.

If there's one thing I've learned in the last six years, it's that Orwell was not exaggerating. Reality really is completely malleable to these people. They'll say one thing on Monday, and insist the opposite has always been true on Tuesday. "Reality" is whatever serves their immediate purposes.

I don't expect our corrupt corporate media to note these blatant contradictions and convenient about-faces. The really disheartening thing is that so many regular people seem blind to it.

When Orwell wrote "1984" he had the Soviet Union in mind. I think he'd be appalled to see what has happened to the U.S.

> When Orwell wrote “1984″ he had the Soviet Union in mind.

I disagree. I think he had the U.S. in mind. He had "vision".

> I think he’d be appalled to see what has happened to the U.S.

I agree.

I agreed with every word Dick Cheney said.

That should be played on every media outlet.

In 2000, I voted for Bush/Cheney because I thought they would be much less internationalist / meddling that Gore / Lieberman. I thought their foreign policy would be 'humble'.

I found Cheney to be reassuring since he was from the Bush 41's cabinet and thought there would be a return to adults running foreign policy.

Jesus, I was really wrong.

It is difficult not watching the incredibly moving 9/11 Press for Truth on Free Speech TV and not feel a sense of outrage at not only the administration but at the media for failing to go after the administration's claim that they had no idea that terrorists might use planes as weapons inside the United States. As Paul Thomson states in the film, if he as an amateur was able to find out the information that belied the administration's story, then certainly the mainstream media should have been able to do the same thing, As former CIA analyst Ray McGovern pointed out, 80 per cent of the information was available yet the mainstream media failed to connect the dots. Failure to protect this country from being attacked is simply another reason why Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, et al, should be impeached.

Site Monitor: You're skirting the edges of dangerous territory, Erroll. Please respect the siteowner's wishes to not have discussion of 9/11 theories on this site.

As someone on another forum I frequent said

"Shouldn't the Cheney in our dimension have a goatee?"

BG! W00t!

Brian,
Oh, buddy. Sorry. Wow.

On second thought, someone play this clip for Dick Cheney. Ram it down HIS throat.

oh my god. This nightmare never ends, does it.

it never ends, its all of our worst fears, and more, because its true.

gene214 @ 39:

smike @ 33:

[Refers to deleted trollage]

Man, who put that website together - a fucking 12 year old?? I mean the Ace of Spades with crossed swords is juvenile enough, but what's with the flaming skull?? Like I said, it looks like it was put together by a 12 year old while hiding out in his tree house - the one with the "no gurls aloud" sign on the door.

Lemme guess, since I got here late....The site's called "The He Man Woman Haters Club".

How very Republican these days.

smike @ 51:

RE: Deleted.Trollage for my #33 post

Is snarkage outlawed on this site?

[Looked like trollage to us-- Sitemonitor]

Maybe I don't understand what trollage is, but are you defending Ace from defamation? This is quite mysterious to me.

Now I will just go away.

Andy K @ 57:

I get the aversion to eye contact- Cheney's got a Reluctant Medusa Complex- but wtf is up with his inability to keep his head up? That dome looks like it's floppin' around in a strong breeze!

It's all those years of crouching under small bridges and grabbing children. He lists to one side from carrying them under one arm into his cave.

Oh sure, but in that Universe you also have to contend with Spock wearing a goatee, and Uhura packing a switchblade.

driftglass @ 60:

Oh sure, but in that Universe you also have to contend with Spock wearing a goatee, and Uhura packing a switchblade.

I preferred DS9 in the paralell Universe. More moral ambiguity.

This MuthaFu**A is crazy!!!

even the trolls agree: dick's a nazi.

joe cantwell @ 66:

even the trolls agree: dick's a nazi.

I reckon so.

Disco Inferno @ 55:

Saw "NO END IN SIGHT" the whole Bush administration, past and present, MUST go to prison.

There must be consequences for the crimes that have been committed by Bush and his ilk.

God damn it _ I am so pissed have been for a long time. What I want to know is what is the Democratic party going to do about it?!!!!? NOTHING?!!!!? YOU FUCKERS!!! YOU FUCKERS!!!! YOU FUCKERS!!! YOU CANNOT CONTINUE TO LET THIS GO ON WITHOUT PUNISHMENT. We will pay if we don't make restitution for all the harm and that is putting it lightly. I'm at such a loss - Please Please Please America make right this horrendous wrong our country has committed. We must. We must.

I know man, alot of us feel the same frustration. It's hard to sit back and just watch these Fuckers run roughshod over the Constitution.

I finally got tired of it and hung my American Flag upsidedown in protest only to have my Homeowners Association tell me to put it rightside up. I think my ultra-conservative neighbor squealed on me. He's squealed on me before over stupid stuff.

Fortunately, the ACLU has stepped in on my behalf and is taking care of the flag situation. Or at least gave me some information to pass on to my HOA and told me to call them if they give me any more trouble.

But I'm sick of it and I'm sick of people not letting me tell people I'm sick of it. If that makes sense.

[...] Crooks and Liars.) Permalink | Leave a Comment | RSS 2.0 Spew your [...]

Slippery Slope @ 12:

Where the hell has this been for 5 plus years?

LIKE YEAH? THANK YOU!!!

If I were a site-mon here at C&L - I'd establish a rule that any variation of the word "first" would be auto deleted from the thread with out any expalanation.

Back when Cheney gave that interview, He was working for Bush #41. And Poppa Bush wouldn't invade even though Cheney wanted to at the time.

But Poppa Bush threatened to withhold Cheney's pace maker replacement he needed desperately at the time. So
Cheney was kept on his leash. With Bush #43, Cheney decided to be on top this time around, And I don't think their wives care, as long as its not with another woman.....................................

> If I were a site-mon here at C&L - I’d establish a rule that any variation of the word “first” would be auto deleted from the thread with out any expalanation.

I don't think the site monitors establish any rules around here. They just do what Mr. Amato tells them to, IMHO.

[...] to Blue Gal who’s posting over at C&L right [...]

LanceThruster Says: What happened to the C&L piece on Barry Bonds? Why was it removed? What was wrong with it?

_______________________________________________________________

My country is falling apart, and my fellow American is worried about Bond! Oh Lord. Give some stamina!

garcia, IMHO you have a valid complaint.

The army gets some shrinks, but, unfortunately, none for its generals.

garcia @ 84:

LanceThruster Says: What happened to the C&L piece on Barry Bonds? Why was it removed? What was wrong with it?

_______________________________________________________________

My country is falling apart, and my fellow American is worried about Bond! Oh Lord. Give some stamina!

Oh. stop bein' so effin' self-righteous. A lot of us can walk and chew gum at the same time.

A friend of mine grew up in the Central Valley, not far from San Francisco. Flash remained a Giants fan although he lived the past 40 years in Michigan. He did the old mortal coil shuffle on Wednesday mornin', succmbin' to lung cancer hours after Bonds broke the home run record. Hopefully Flash got to see it. It was important to him.

You've been around long enough, garcia, to know that many threads are posted at C&L each day, mostly political, a few given over to things of slightly less gravitas. Yer welcome to skip the ones you deem trivial. The same applies to other commenters posts. I promise that the next time you post somethin' I don't think carries much importance I won't chide ya on it.

40
Brian Says:

I agreed with every word Dick Cheney said.

That should be played on every media outlet.

In 2000, I voted for Bush/Cheney because I thought they would be much less internationalist / meddling that Gore / Lieberman. I thought their foreign policy would be ‘humble’.

I found Cheney to be reassuring since he was from the Bush 41’s cabinet and thought there would be a return to adults running foreign policy.

Jesus, I was really wrong.

Brian, that was really brave of you to admit that. It was a media theme, too -- "the adults are running things again." Needless to say, the inside-the-Beltway pundits like David Broder and Jim Hoagland and Richard Cohen and David Brooks and Charles Krauthammer and all of the other yo-yos at the Washington Post and the New York Times agreed with you. Saddam was "bad", his regime had to overthrown, even if there was no proof ever that he had WMD's (and remember, he did let in the U.N. inspectors -- it was Bush who chased them out).

And still these lying bozos persist -- not only Bush and Cheney and Lieberman, but also Broder and Brooks and Hiatt. They still won't admit that we made a bloody, disastrous, expensive mistake.

Frankly, the people who pressed this War on Iraq are truly war criminals (more than 3,000 Americans and 650,000 Iraqis have died as a result of this war). It's going to cost our country more than 1.8 trillion dollars before it's over...and the end is not yet in sight.

During World War II, there were the "good Germans" who didn't approve of what Hitler and his Nazi minions did. Now, I am sure that there are many "good Americans" who don't approve of what Bush and his loyal minions are doing in Iraq. Still, we are all guilty if we continue to allow it to happen.

We must stop the bloodshed and bring the troops home.

Otherwise, we become complicit in the crimes of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Joe Lieberman.

Please give us the strength to resist their ignorance.

Slap them with their own red herring?

Good lord, who would have believed that Cheney's reasoning predeceeded that of "left-wing" bloggers of today.

He was perhaps a corporation "foot in the door" to politics at that date, but that was before they got their chance to take over the White House entirely. No matter how bad things go for the Cheney administration because of their blunders, they always have a final line: war is profitable.

rcg @ 22:

has anyone else noticed how the cockiness and the boldness of the neocons has returned (to it's former high) now that they know that many democrats are with them and that the democratic party won't stand in their way?

K.I.S.S. They're all being blackmailed. After seeing this clip, I'd put Cheney in that pot, too.

What do you think the warrantless wire-tapping is for? This is dirty business. Defense contractor industrial espionage on $bn bids, for one; and blackmail of the people in office who would lose career, prestige, and coin if their shenanigans ever got out. At age 50+, the blackmailed will just go along; life is too short to ruin themselves and their families and their retirement for principled action that's forgotten within one news cycle, or impossible whistleblower glory.

Listen, I used to hear about this in the cafes when I grew up. It was a cynical adjunct to the afternoon banter I heard my father and his friends joke about. "So easy to turn an American politician." Blah-blah-blah. Except in those days, they did it with prostitutes, female and male, kinky stuff, and hidden cameras, just as they did with Palestinian informants to keep them in line for the future. I heard what they did in South America and South Africa to get an attache to flip, or an ambassador to behave. My father wasn't involved with that as far as I know. He was a House Manager to a rich man. But his friends did. They were the drivers for bigshots, sometimes the procurors, and they heard the stories coming back from America, and around the world. In my country then, if you were in on an information pipeline, you knew what everybody knew, because they knew you'd keep your mouth shut. Here, in the USA, it's all compartmentalized. There, you know.

The neocons wouldn't have this hold without their fingers on the short and curlies. Not a chance. What if someone had complete photographic and audio/video details about one of your wild and woolly nights that you want kept under the rug? And you're running for office? And you have a new wife, and a hideous mortgage, and young kids? You think you're going to get patriotic for a country that will just laugh at you and make sure you never work again, and you lose everything? A running jokeon HuffPo and Tucker for a week? Or are you going to protect your own?

Call me cynical. This is what's going on.

Stanley Rosenthal @ 97:

The latest numbers I heard is that we're about to X cross +- the 1 million number when it comes to the number of Iraqis we've murdered since President George "D Dubya I" Bush's occupation of Iraq.

Already crossed. We are all complicit. I am guilty of this no matter how many letters I write, how many phone calls I make to the WH or my congressman. This number does not include the killing of 500,000 children Albright said on 60 Minutes (?) her 1990s policies condoned, not the number in the first Iraq war.

This is a holocaust:
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html

The number is shocking and sobering.

It is at least 10 times greater than most estimates cited in the US media, yet it is based on the only scientifically valid study of violent Iraqi deaths caused by the U.S.-led invasion of March 2003.

That study, published in prestigious medical journal The Lancet, estimated that over 600,000 Iraqis had been killed as a result of the invasion as of July 2006. Iraqis have continued to be killed since then. The graphic above provides a rough daily update of this number based on a rate of increase derived from the Iraq Body Count. (See the complete explanation.)

One thing for sure is that although the Neo cons show absolutely no exit strategy for the military in Iraq. They most definately have an exit strategy out of prison. Ask I Lewis Scooter Libby. Or how I will always remember him as " Inmate #28301-016 ".

Ticking Dick was reprogrammed durring a heart battery replacement

Blaed @ 95:

I was looking at a conservative blog and most of the posts said something along the lines of: "Well that was then! Now is because of 9/11."
God...I was I could find some kind of sanity from these people.

You would have better luck looking for a virgin in a whorehouse.

It's all bitter and no sweet for this symphony:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7xyd_IRgGs

hadenuf @ 1:

I just watched "Grapes of Wrath" for the first time tonight.
Steinbeck was quite the lefty, until the Vietnam War.
Go figure.

sour grapes.

HulksHeroes @ 89:

What a turd!! Play this clip on the propaganda network some time. What a blatant joke. Here he speaks as though he has his head out of his ass. All we've heard since this criminal took office is "we're winning", "we're liberators", "we're bringing democracy", "they have WMD's" lies, lies, lies...and more lies. HANG THE SOB!!

and very slowly i might add!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hareli @ 101:

The number is 1,000,985.

We're responsible for the deaths of over a million people in the past 4 years.

Saddam killed maybe 25,000 in the previous 25 years - and the large percentage of those people were those with allegiances to the Ayatollah Khomeini (a person conservatives so conveniently forgot).

So the dirty rotten mother f!@#$r knew what he was dragging this country into as well as we did, but just didn't care, it was "Business"...."Oil-Business"

He should be fed to the pigs like they do on Deadwood.

Stu Bykofsky: To save America, we need another 9/11

http://www.philly.com/dailynews/columnists/stu_bykofsky/20070809_Stu_Byk...

Hillary, Hiroshima, and Hubris
Justifying mass murder
The anniversary of the U.S. bombing of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is, perhaps, a good time to note that arguments rationalizing and even valorizing the use of nuclear weapons, once considered beyond the pale, are now back in fashion. Here we have yet more evidence of the Bizarro Effect, which, ever since 9/11, has stood everything – especially our traditional concept of morality – on its head, not only repealing the laws of logic and common sense but also ensconcing evil in the place of good.

Why, just the other day, U.S. presidential aspirant and sometime antiwar candidate Barack Obama was asked by a reporter if he would authorize the use of nuclear weapons against al-Qaeda. Instead of looking at the man as if he were more than half-crazy and pointedly asking to see his press credentials, Obama ruled out the possibility… or, maybe not. I'll leave it to my readers to make the call: (READ ON)

http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=11418

longnow @ 69:

This says what I said four years ago: Cheney made no mistakes when he went in with too few troops it was deliberate,
Cheney deliberately fired the Baathist civil service and Iraqi army, Cheney deliberately left weapons dumps unguarded,
knew all the weapons given to Iraqi police would disappear, allowed all the corruption possible, knew that explosives would be
stolen and used on our troops, knew we would never be able to train any police or army.

Why did he do it? Ray McGovern uses the acronym OIL; O-guess what, I-for Israel, L-for FE, ME and domestic political leverage.
Encourage chaos, establish empire through perpetual war, sacrifice as many soldiers as is necessary, in return he gives the
military industrial complex all the money and power they need to run the economy into the ground while cutting taxes forcing the US to start over economically and culturally which will, in turn, bring the rest of the world down with us.

There was never any grand experiment for Iraq, never any plan for democracy, all the nonsense about WMD's was
an excuse. The country will be in such bad shape any democrat elected will never overcome the corruption, lose of revenue
through war and tax cuts, a draft will be initiated after Persian or Arabic blowback for all the civilians killed "over there".
Blowback will consist of either sabotage at our ports with IED's (as in sinking and blowing up an oil tanker inside one or more of our ports)
or a dirty bomb in one or more of our cities.

Your fundamental assertion - that the US's cuurent circumstances in Iraq were utterly predictable, and that the management of the invasion and occupation seemed deliberately designed to produce exactly the consequences we are seeing - is valid.

Those running this campaign may eb venal, but they are not stupid. Cheney, the architect of much of it, clearly understands the terms and consequences of the conflict, as this video makes plain.

The question then becomes, if they have deliberately put themselves in a situation where the US military is embroiled in chaos in Iraq, and on the cusp of war with Iran, what could they possibly have had to gain, beyond contracts for Halliburton.

As much as I find Ron Paul a bit queasy in his racist baiting and his isolationist bent, this speech before congress is worth a watch or a read.

He makes the completely plausible argument that the US has targeted, for war or coup, those nations who have mused about tagging their oil sales to the Euro instead of the Dollar (Iraq, Venezuela, Iran).

There's plenty of other resources a mere Google search away:
http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/17450
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Iraq/Iraq_dollar_vs_euro.html
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CLA410A.html

I find these arguments completely persuasive, in that they adequately explain a variety of seeming otherwise inexplicable aspects of current world affairs, such as...

- the completely specious linking of Saddam and 9/11 as an excuse for invasion
- the pre-9/11 obsession with Saddam
- the obsession with Venezuela and the US support for the aborted coup
- the sabre rattling and seemingly inevitable war with Iran
- the odd dance with China who both holds dollar debt and is oddly dependent on the Dollar

If seen through the lens of this argument, it becomes clear that the Iraq occupation isn't technically about oil - as in the supply of oil - but more about forestalling the collapse of the dollar and the American economy. Witness the unbelievable movement of the Euro in comparison with the dollar, and mark the fact that the EU can easily expand and grow the need for, and strength of their currency, and you have some sense of the sleepless nights that American leaders must have.

Imagine a wholesale sell-off of dollars world wide, the liquidation of China's reserves, and the collapse of the dollar.

This is what, it seems, the administration is trying to avoid or delay, no matter how many Iraqi civilians, or how many US soldiers have to die.

Maybe Paul and the others are wrong, but right now, their theories explain the current reality - and the video clip above - more than any other theory I've heard.

Remember that, in the clip above, Cheney is talking long before Saddam began, in 2001 and 2002, to talk about pegging his oil sales to the Euro and, in fact, when Cheney is talking (1994, I believe), the Euro was in its infancy and no-one could have predicted that it would come to challenge the Dollars hegemony.

I've always found the "they're stupid, evil, and personally greedy" meme unpersuasive. But the Dollar theory seems credible to me.

Erin @ 122:

One Big Reason Markets are Plunging

China's Threat to the Dollar is Real

http://www.counterpunch.com/roberts08102007.html

Erin, it is perversely ironic that, during the Vietnam era, the US was afraid that China would end up defeating America by spreading Communism.

Now it looks like they have done it by lending America money.

It was Capitalism, not Communism, that proved to be the American achilles heel.

Freaked-Out Canadian -

Well said, and I agree. More than the oil-supply (which is never-the-less an important factor), the timing of the Iraq invasion and our recent Iran-directed saber-rattling is based on the conversion of oil-reserve currencies from the dollar to the Euro. That this conversion will happen is inevitable – it IS happening. We (the US gov) want to forestall an all-out sell-off of dollars to minimize the impact on our economy.

Saddam appeared foolish before OPEC when he started to switch to the Euro in the 90’s. That currency wasn’t as strong then as it is today. Now he seems prescient. Our first invasion was timed as a sanction for this conversion. Now the Saudis, Iranians and the rest of OPEC are starting to do the same thing. That’s why we have 2-3 carrier fleets in the Persian Gulf.

It’s interesting how were paying for this military intrusion though. It’s financed via debt to China. Now they hold more cards than OPEC, with as much to gain from controlling the oil supplies as we do (and India and Japan).

Scary predicament we’ve put ourselves in…

That evil fuck always says something like "Our judgment was x, y and z; and I think we got it right."

The answer, of course, is that "9/11 changed everything".

As in, 9/11 is the reason to be stupid? Sheesh.

...

It's just been confirmed by the crack C&L Research Dept: This was the last time Dick Cheney was right!

Da Spyda @ 13:

I guess our current Vice President is the evil twin.

*snort* Bwa hah ha ha ha.

The current VP is fatter, has less hair and is stupider. But he still tells lies out the one side of his mouth doesn't he?

Send this vid out to seven people.

Ask that they send it to seven other people.

No immediate financial award - just the feeling that you helped stop this war and save the lives of thousands of humans and helped restore America's name.

Well, compared to the chilling info I just saw and heard in Aaron Russo's film 'America: Freedom to Fascism' this is not even a minor surprise. See the film - if you can find it. Google has removed it several times, and Mr. Russo keeps posting it, but how long can he keep up with the corporate-owned wage slaves dedicated to silencing him?

Suffice to say, the international banking cartel that's behind EVERYTHING is closing the gaps, and we're all worm meat. We've already seen that Congress is scared to death of the WH, and will simply rubber-stamp whatever is demanded of them. The elections are rigged, the jack-booted storm troopers will break down your door and taze you if you do not obey them instantly, regardless of whether you've broken any actual law. It's over, America. The rule of law is done.

Sorry for the dbl comment...

Know what? C&L is becoming quite tedious. Honestly. May I suggest, rather than putting ancient history on, like this video, just to put something on, put nothing on. Less is more if you get my drift. Anyone alive and paying attention both during the Gulf war and at the start of the Iraq war realize that Dickie was reversing himself. It seems to be quite well understood what a tool our Vice President is. Is it really necessary to waste time and effort to once again drive this point home to those who already understand it?

Well, look what the cat dragged off.

Get used to this one:

THERE IS A CONSPIRACY

By Pastor Chuck Baldwin

July 13, 2007

A reader's letter intrigues me. He writes, "I find everything you say about a coming New World Order and One World Government extremely difficult to believe. For one thing, while you yourself obviously display no hate towards anyone, most other conspiracy theorists are anti-Semites." He further wrote, "An intelligent man such as yourself would do well to distance yourself from these loony theories."

I will quickly acknowledge that unfortunately there are a significant number of conspiracy theories promulgated by people with obvious anti-Semitic tendencies. I join my reader friend in repudiating such bigotry.

However, just because certain conspiracy theories are advocated by people with personal agendas and extremist ideologies is not reason enough to automatically dismiss the facts that suggest there is a conspiracy to steal America's sovereignty and independence. These facts are plentiful and powerful. Only foolish people would dismiss them out-of-hand.

As a Christian, I believe the Word of God to be my source of faith and practice. Therefore, I must take seriously the Word's admonition that, "There is a conspiracy" (Ezek. 22:25). In fact, the conspiracy to overthrow righteousness (and any semblance of it) is ubiquitous.

Furthermore, if one will study American history, he will note our Founding Fathers firmly believed a conspiracy of influential internationalists was behind many of the draconian decisions of old King George. They said as much in the Declaration of Independence.

In the Declaration, Thomas Jefferson wrote, "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security." If that isn't a clear reference to conspiracy, I don't know what is.

As in British-controlled America 200 years ago, policies advanced by like-minded politicos today attempt to erode our constitutional laws and national independence. Only a naïve person would suggest that this is mere coincidence. I remind my readers that George Bush, Sr. first popularized the name "New World Order." However, he is not the only notable personality that has openly called for such an international order.

Former newsman, Walter Cronkite, has openly called for world government. Others calling for world government include England's Prime Minister, Tony Blair; former Clinton cabinet member, Strobe Talbott; and a variety of spokesmen for the United Nations, as well as leaders from various multinational corporations. To think that all of these people (whose numbers are multitudinous) should not be taken seriously is the height of idiocy.

Yes, my friends, there is a conspiracy. No, it is not a Jewish conspiracy. It is much more than that. It is a conspiracy of elitists from all races and ethnic backgrounds who deeply despise our constitutional form of government, our national independence, and our Christian heritage. Some are communists; others are socialists. Some call themselves liberals, and some even call themselves conservatives. Labels mean little.

Most of the conspirators are wealthy and well positioned to advance their utopian ideas. Some teach in our nation's colleges and universities. Some occupy powerful positions in the media and in our political institutions. Some of them are also found behind the pulpits of churches, and, yes, some are found in synagogues.

The promoters of internationalism may not conduct monthly meetings. They may not carry New World Order membership cards in their wallets (albeit, if they are members of the Council of Foreign Relations, people who love liberty should be very wary of them), but collectively they form a credible conspiracy to rob America of its independence. Furthermore, as long as patriotic Americans refuse to acknowledge their existence, the more effective they are at accomplishing their oligarchic objectives.

[...] read more | digg story [...]

unfuckingbelievable.