White House rewards FOX Propaganda exclusive interview with Gen. Petraeus and Amb. Crocker
By John Amato Sunday Sep 09, 2007 9:10am
If there was any doubt to the US public that Gen. Petraeus was being used a puppet for Bush's war---it should be gone now. Brit Hume of FOX Propaganda was granted an exclusive interview with the general, who is supposed to be giving an honest assessment of the "surge" and the state of affairs in Iraq. Bush might have well as given Rush Limbaugh the honors. No longer can the administration claim he is the voice of reason or not acting as an echo chamber for their plan to keep the surge and the war going as long as possible.
"On Fox News Sunday this morning, host Chris Wallace announced the interview:
WALLACE: Now a special program note. Tomorrow night at 9:00 p.m. eastern on the Fox News Channel, Brit will have an exclusive interview with General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker about the state of the Iraq war and their testimony to Congress. Please be sure to watch."
The American people already have little faith in his report and this event should seal the deal. If he was truly non-partisan, then this interview would never be taking place.









Login or Register to post comments.
See, this is what I was talking about on the last thread. Only appearing on the GOP propaganda station is all the proof anyone needs that the general is part of the rotten machine. I have lost any admiration I might have had of him if he has allowed himself to be dictated to by the administration.
Sweeet.
This is a "three for the price of one" deal! Faux President appears with Faux War Czar on Faux News! What a deal!
Everyone already knew (and stopped watching) that Fox News was Bush's personal "propaganda megaphone" so what else is new?
All you have to do is tune into either Britt Hume or Sean Hannity and see how twisted and demented these individuals are. They're so transparent in their sickness and spinning of Bush's failed foreign policies that they're beginning to looks like "payola buffoons".
Why do we need more datapoints in order to decide that Petraeus is a political general?
It is no surprise that The War Decider Commander Guy who makes every decision during the day with War On His Mind, would give the Cheerleaders For War and Slaughter Channel an exclusive interview the Republican Political General Spokesman for the Republican Party.
A can imagine Bush this morning, thinking as Condi butters his muffins, "Yum, that muffin is crispy, like children burning alive in the phosgene rain. Smells Good! War, War on my mind."
Check the language:
"Gen. Petraeus was being used a puppet for Bush’s war" -> "Gen. Petraeus was being used as a puppet for Bush’s war"
"Bush might have well as given Rush Limbaugh the honors." -> "Bush might as well have given Rush Limbaugh the honors."
pissed off patricia @ 1:
Nobody's paying the least bit of attention to this Faux President on a Faux news station.....and watching him pull the strings on his Faux War Czar, General Betray-us! He's playing to am empty theatre these days. Fox News has become Bush's poodle puppet and, in doing so, has become totally irrelevant as a worthwhile news station.
Most of america isn't watching Fox News any longer.
How exactly is this a reward?
Henrik Berglund @ 6:
I seem to recall something in the posting rules:
Spelling police not wanted.
Its somewhat bad form to nitpick on presentation, in an attempt to deflect focus from the substance.
[Lifted from the Daily Dish]
They couldn't be that stupid, could they?
I shall paraphrase, but you will get it.
1. Conflating Saddam with the 9/11 attacks.
2. Saddam has absolutely reconstituted his WMD program.
3. Occupying a country the size of Iraq with 160,000 troops which included support troops. Had it been 160,000 combat troops (Infantry, Armor, and Artillery) with the appropriate support contingent we may have had a chance.
4.Disbanding a standing army. THEN telling them they will not be paid! Oh, and by the way take your guns with you!
5. Mission Accomplished.
6. Bring it on!
7. We have to fight them over there, so we don't have to fight them here.
8. As the Iraqi Army stands up, we will stand down.
9. Firing Rumsfeld AFTER the '06 election. So we give a failed SecDef 3 1/2 years to get it right.
I paraphrase. You decide.
pissed off patricia @ 1:
really was theyr any doubt, i said gen betrays was picked because he would lick bushes cock!
This crooked administration isn't staying in power by itself, it has help from its supposed enemy, the Democratic congress. When is everyone gonna wake up and realize that our government is nothing more than a FAKE, an elaborate dinner theater put on by our fascist government.
i think it's being way overly optimistic when you state that the american people have little faith in this deal and this should push it over the top. the other side of the coin is that the american people watch fox for their "news" and listen to the conservative pundits to form their opinions. consequently when this goes down, it's another instance of it's on the tv, then it must be true.
What? No open press conference? What? No demand for one from the MSM?
Democrats in Congress = NO BALLS
MSM = NO BALLS or PART OF THE PLAN
added ammunition , just to get more milliage out of a disaster this government did to its citizens, old samma tape released , then a tape of a he he terriorists last testiment before crashing into a twin tower , being released the day before the sixth anaversiry of 911, they have me convinced , it really was 19 mid east hijackers who defeated our norad system, good thing cheny was calling the shots that day , think of how bad that day could have been if cheny had not been directing our interceptor air craft!
Don't forget that the goal of the surge was to give the Iraqi Parliament time to get it's act together. While we surged, the parliament went on vacation.
The goal of the surge was not met. By this metric, the surge is a complete failure.
But the tactic of the surge, was successful. We surged. So the Republican Spokesman for the US Military, General Petraeus is going to explain that the tactic was executed successfully.
To make a silly analogy, say a Goerge Bush comes up with the idea of crapping his pants in order to rain pizzas on the world. He craps his pants, but the pizzas do not arrive. He declares success as he now has a pant load.
AL QAEDA MATH = CIVIL WAR --- AL QAEDA'S NUMBERS ARE ONLY 3% TO 5% OF THE TOTAL SUNNI INSURGENCY!
Since Bush has repeatedly claimed we’re in Iraq to fight "Al Qaeda", the terrorists responsible for 9/11, why do we need 160,000 American soldiers to oppose a fighting force estimated to be no more than 3,000 at best?
Is "Al Qaeda's" fighting force of no more than 3000 so much better organized, armed and equipped that they've been able to successfully thwart 160,000 American soldiers after 4.5 years?
Is "Al Qaeda's" fighting force of no more than 3000 solely responsible for the nearly 4000 “American” deaths thus far?
How many “Americans” were killed by “Sunnis” or “Shiites” or “Kurds”? How many “Al Qaeda” fighters have been killed by “American” troops or by “Sunnis” or “Shiites” or “Kurds”?
Do dead “Al Qaeda” fighters immediately return to life to form an inexhaustible number of living dead fighters for “Americans”, “Sunnis”, “Shiites” and “Kurds” to kill again and again?
Are “Al Qaeda” fighters solely responsible for the killing of the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians?
“Al Qaeda” isn’t the reason for the killing, destruction and chaos in Iraq. “George W. Bush” is! His dishonest motives, his incompetent planning, his irresponsible cronyism, his arming of sectarian, political and criminal factions, his enabling of ethnic cleansing and civil war, his ignorance, arrogance and immorality have resulted in a level of destruction and death that he is solely responsible for. Everything he has done in Iraq has been based on lies for reasons of political expediency. Intentionally or not, he is truly a mass-murderer.
George W. Bush is relying on the same math in Iraq that Karl Rove used when he guaranteed Republicans would hold their majorities in the House and Senate before the 2006 elections?
"[I]t is estimated that foreigners make up at least 70 percent of al Qaeda's 1,000 to several thousand fighters. Other estimates suggest al Qaeda's numbers around 850, about 3 to 5 percent of the Sunni insurgency."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda_in_Iraq
After 4.5 years, there are no accepted/enforced rules of law in Iraq....there is no trustworthy or unified police force or Army....there is no trustworthy or unified government….there is no personal safety as sectarian violence goes unpunished....there is no electricity, water or oil as competing factions fight for power....over a million Iraqis have fled the country for fear of being murdered/becoming collateral damage....hundreds of billions of American dollars have been squandered, while nearly 4000 American soldiers and untold thousands of American mercenaries and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians have died in a “phony” war....and Bush and his monsters of remorseless cruelty falsely pronounce the "surge" is working? What would Americans do if these conditions existed in New York, Los Angeles and Chicago? What Bush and his cohorts have done in Iraq is the greatest “crime” of the 21st century because they invaded and are occupying a country for "political" purposes only that had/has nothing to do with America's security. Bush "created" a “phony” war to hold and expand his "political" power in "America". He forfeited our military preparedness and political influence throughout the world in pursuit of personal power. America’s enemies couldn't have caused more harm to America's interests, welfare and future than George W. Bush has. And yet there are still people who support this shamelessly deceitful and incompetent pretender who wants to continue making the same destructive and deadly mistakes he’s made all along to save his "political" legacy. The moral and ethical disconnect of these whores of partisanship and power is universally "wrong". There is no morality, common sense or good faith in defending the false motives, lies and unconscionable failures of George W. Bush. There is only the perpetuation of death and the "politics" of malevolent and or incompetent men/women whose ambitions have perverted their integrity, patriotism and humanity. Our constitution was written to protect us from times like these. Justice and "righteousness" require impeachment!
Brit Hume? Pathetic.
Wasnt Geraldo available?
Weaseldog @ 16:
Man, I like pizza. Don't do this ever again, OK? :-)
Well, if anyone had any doubt that FOX is the official State News Network, this should put those doubts to rest.
better and better. now the big day is to be broadcast exclusively on fox.
i wonder how they will spin things? we're on the verge of victory, or we're barely holding on as it is. either way, the perscription is the same. status quo, prn.
"Stupid," no.
"Evil," yes.
If you read the book "Fiasco" you see that during the first years of the war, Petraeus was a good guy and the way he dealt with the Iraqis was the right way. He befriended them and respected them. I guess the temptation of becoming the big cheese was just too much for him and he sold his soul to the administration in return.
When Fox is given an interview like this it's their reward for carrying the water (or blood) for the administration. When the white house wants something out, they know who to call.
gene214 @ 22:
i'm going to write comcast and suggest them ove faux news from channel 37 to network 23.
its so easy to lead the sheeple, generals are smarter then anyone , just look at doug mc arther ,he left the phillipines ahead of being captured by the japs , left even though he had no orders to do so, saved his and his familys ass while he left the defenders to die in jap prison camps , then as he did in the korean war took all the credit for inchon landings that one of his subordinates thought up , as he did in every opperation in the pacific war ,then wants to start the third world war with red china and mcs fired by trueman and the sheeple elect ike because thier pissed at truman, shows what dumbasses americans are
I wonder if Petraeus' testimony will get as much air time on all the cable news channels as Anna Nicole did? Doubt it. I hate it when the news readers say they will "monitor" what's going on instead of showing us what's going on. Britney Spears is getting just about as much attention today as this report is and that's just sad.
pissed off patricia @ 1:
I agree with you wholeheartedly. The man has no credibility. Being a shill for this lying corrupt a$$hat of a president holds no glory. People without courage do this sort of thing. What a shame!
Brit Hume is a wrinkly faced comfort man for the junta
osage @ 18:
You said it! and beautifully, I might add. People with integrity, moral courage, and truth as their guides MUST put an end to this corrupt and inane U.S. government. Time to impeach is absolutely here. What's up with those Democrats elected to office to do as the people of America say? Stand up to this chicanery!
General Petraeus: You see, Brit, things are beginning to start to look very much like they will shortly be going less badly than they were before the surge, at least in certain areas of the country.
Hume: So, are you saying that only pro-Terrorist Liberals who want to bring Osama bin Laden to America so he can undergo therapy with Lyndsay Lohan would oppose an additional 6 months and the less than $100 billion it will cost to keep our troops (whom we support but Liberals who claim to support really want to see die without weapons or ammunition) in position to ensure that the freedoms the Iraqi people may someday have will stay on track as a non-bid deliverable?
General Petraeus: I'm saying that there's no guarantee that another 6 months will be sufficient to allow a new nation like Iraq which is barely at the toddler stage of nationhood to stand up on its tiny feet and provide security for its people although with the president's plans to arm the militias and work feverishly to help them fight each other at least we know that stability may be elusive but that freedom, though distant, is on track because the surge has proven to be effective in all of those places where we can clearly see it has had an effect.
Hume: And there you have it. Straight truth from a straight shooter of the truth. Thank you General, for your service in opposing treason and in supporting the principles on which Ruppert Murdoch likes to think this Country is based.
Norse @ 9:
You, and the posting rules you recall, are dead wrong.
First, it's not spelling or language.
It's grammar.
If we are so lazy that we accept grade school errors in the written word, how exacting can we be expected to be when demanding the truth from the media?
Weaseldog @ 16:
Bush announces that he will dig a tunnel to China.
The Democratic candidates all point out that it is impossible to dig a tunnel to China, though Hillary warns that no president should ever take 'digging a tunnel to China' off the table.
Cheney criticizes the Democratic candidates for not showing that they have a better plan for digging a tunnel to China. Rudy Giuliani assures us that he's been thinking about digging a tunnel to China every day since 9/11.
After six months, Bush makes a speech in front of soldiers. He claims that he knew that people would forget why we're digging a tunnel to China, that it would be a long dig, the ideological dig of our generation. He assures us that as China digs more, we will dig less. His ratings continue to plummet, as the public (with the exception of a teen beauty contestant or two) understands that you can't dig a tunnel to China. (You at least need a map, or something.)
Senator Feinstein says she'll support the president as long as he nominates a competent digger.
And so it goes.
Patraeus...Patraeus...Patraeus! One would think we are standing at the altar awaiting the sermon from the mount! Sweet Jesus this guy is nothing more than a politician drapped in military garb. Patraeus is out for Patraeus! I guarantee this guy upon retiring will become a multi-millionaire working for Faux news or some military industrial group.
So Bush using Fox means they're aiming the message to the base. They can't afford to lose anymore support, and fuck the rest of america as usual.
Too bad i cant just drop Fox News from my cable subscription.
They should ask the scab fake General, what will we win and is it worth the lives and the trillion?
Of course it's on Faux. There is no channel to better forward the propaganda in its proper context than Faux.
someone tell me why two public servants are inclined to give an interview exclusive to inform the american people of our course in war and of national defense?
as it has been noted, if this was not politically motivated, they should be interviewed on public airwaves
the Communist Russian Dictator had his media outlet - it was called Pravda, and it only broadcast material that the government wanted the people to hear. The American Dictator ("this would be a lot easier if this was a dictatorship, and I was the Dictator, heh heh...) has Fox News, and they only, only broadcast the material that the government wants the people to hear. Are there any American patriots who find this alarming?
[...] and Liars caught something I missed (because I just can’t turn the channel to Fox News): Fox News gets the interviews with General Patraeus (R-Army) and Ambassador Crocker [...]
Fuh!
With a compliant Congress and Media it would not surprise me if Bush nominated David Duke for the Civil Rights Commision, appointed Ann Coulter to replace Tony Snow and made the announcement in underwear with racing stripes. He feels he can do no wrong and the people with the Constitutional authority to say otherwise are either tacitly complicit or in full support. Don't be shocked if next week he urges Congress to send economic aid to Ruppert Murdock then watch the other networks start vying for some aid too.
Speaking of propaganda...
If you read what CBS has to say about Gen. David Petraeus's testimony you will discover that what they have to say is what the National Review has to say.
"Democrats will be courting political disaster if they make a full frontal assault on General Petraeus when he testifies about the surge today before a joint hearing of the House Armed Services and International Relations committees. Petraeus knows more about Iraq than they do; he has more credibility; and - judging by his careful statements about the surge so far - he is considerably more sober-minded."
The General has to have a war going, I mean how much golf, and reviewing of the troops can any one man stand?
The general, who had his lips surgically attached to the chimps sphincter, loses any pretense of objectivity by doing the faux interview.
Actually, it might be best, as the only people who'll see it are already lobotomized by watching that fascist propoganda mill.
Who cares?
Seriously ... Fox?
Why should I, or anyone else with a functioning brain pay attention to anything Fox, or any Murdoch outlet, has to say.
Yes yes, I know, some people still do.
But you know what? Those people are fricking idtios. No amount of reasoning is going to reach them.
None.
I have as much chance as reasoning with some who thinks that freedom is on the march or Anbar is better off or the skies are cleaner or the forests are healthier or there are less children left behind as I am going to have reasoning with Osama Bin Laden about modern feminist theory.
So stop worrying about them, and just figure out how to make them go away, and cut them out of the political process entirely.
its all bullshit nothings going to change joe scarsburo said so, hillerys a war slut , obammas going along for the ride , last hope is a kucinich voted in as president in 08, if not we , and this and every other blog will be worthless as for changeing the corporate whores who enslaved us, they will just be bitching blogs !
john kerry just a tool of the bush fool, i want the money back i sent this creep!
Another one of chimpy's puppets dancing the chimpy dance.
It's amazing how many repugs he can find to lie for him.
betray-us should be answering to congress not playing footies with chimpy.
These so-called reports should be a transcript that is available for all.
repugs put the slime into snot
I believe the first question that should be asked of both General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker should be:
Has the White House ordered you to portray the Iraq situation in a favorable light?
And the second question should be:
Has the White House suggested to you that it would be in your best interest to portray the Iraq situation in a favorable light?
Might be interesting.
jr @ 30:
He looks and sounds dopey.
He looks like the losing end of a major prize fight.
Patriot Scholar @ 51:
fat chance!
the politicians will spout crap until duncan hunter booses dog that humps his masters legs continuialy !l
tHeGaMeOfLiFe @ 52:
After the brain injuries kick in?
sorry duncan hunters just a mutt that humps bushes legs !
tyree @ 48:
Hillary's a camp follower?
Here's a camp follower for you
http://shanghaiist.com/attachments/shang_dan/harveyfierstein122106.jpg
That just proves that BetrayUs can't answer tought questions.
He has to go on Fox for the neocon softballs.
TB @ 47:
They may be freaking "idtios" (I assume you meant "idiots"), but that doesn't disqualify them from voting! You have to realize that while most of us sit here and say "I don't watch Fox News, so who cares what goes on in their land of make believe", most of the 29%ers (who are, from the looks of it, growing again from all the Iraq/Iran/9-11 steroids being pumped through the media) sit there and say "I trust Fox News, so who cares what goes on in 'reality'." As long as this mentality persists on either side, we'll never see progress. We MUST start taking action against corporate media to DEMAND a return to objective, investigative journalism!!
Catch the announcement first on
PravdaFox News.Patriot Scholar @ 51:
Ehh, not such great politicking. He'll say, "No," to both questions, and that will be that for the hearing. Then they'll have to move on.
The media, however, will pick up on the questions themselves, noting repeatedly that the Democrats aren't interested in real numbers or or reality in general. All they want is for Patraeus to say that Bush wants him to lie. The general was there to convey the truth, but the Democrats want their political, spun reality. That would become the narrative.
Instead, the Democrats should learn how to cross examine Bush officials so that the focus is inevitably on their answers, not the questions.
BigTallMatt @ 59:
Iditos are tostidoes made with iquana meat.
The General is more comfortable in a Fox hole.
Only on Fox you say? Pity.
osage @ 18:
******We require independent investigation and prosecution within a justice system that has been bastardized to include everyone but the administration!!! I personally believe the 'Big Three' need to be tried internationally for crimes against humanity, and hope they suffer the same fate as Sadda Hussein.
jtp*****
Patriot Scholar @ 51:
****I'm sure we would get a repetition of the former Attorney General's testimony: "I can't remember."*****jtp
fucking shit-for-brains uses his propaganda tool fakenewscrap station to spew his continuing lies. if the dem representatives buy it this time(i am a democrat), it's time to look for new representation and replace ALL the wussy spineless bastards with representatives who are not tied and kissing ass with the bush neocon corporations.
i am fucking tired of being misrepresented by someone i elected to represent me and the other Americans who voted for them.
Gen. Petraeus=War Pimp
Wow the McCarthy channel will tonight become the MacArthur channel.
Of course we will return to our fair and balance fascist channel programs after this special broadcast tonight.
Jesus did anyone catch the Fox News last Saturdaynight LIVE with Geraldo? That was by far the weirdest thing I have ever seen on TV, Geraldo was saying that the Nine Eleven Whatever's liked Gay Sex, Geraldo was doing a story about Gay Bathroom Sex? News?
Login or Register to post comments.