Go Home

Iraq Veteran: Why I Fight And Why We Must

I read this exceptional post this morning from Iraq Veteran, John Bruhns, about his experiences before, during and after the invasion and occupation of Iraq and thought it should be read by as many people as possible.

Via Americablog:

As the war drums were beating for Iraq I knew something was wrong. I was paying attention to President Bush as he continually accused Saddam Hussein of possessing weapons of mass destruction and being linked to terrorist organizations such as Al-Qaeda. Yet, there was no solid proof that any of Bush's accusations had any validity to them. I guess if you repeat the same lies over and over again they begin to sound true. How else could Bush have tricked the nation into an unjust and unnecessary war in Iraq?

At the time I was stationed at Fort Riley, Kansas. It seemed as if the moment I arrived there in June 2002 the only message being sent from the top down was to be ready for war with Iraq. We trained vigorously that summer for war. And in January 2003 my unit deployed to Fort Irwin, California for a month long desert warfare training exercise. Immediately upon returning from Fort Irwin my unit received orders to deploy to Kuwait for the military buildup to topple Saddam Hussein and his government in Iraq.

We scrambled to get our gear and equipment ready for what would be the inevitable war with Iraq. It took a couple weeks to prepare, get medically screened, and write out our wills. Then we were put on standby to deploy at a moments notice. Read more...

Share This Post

Link To This Post


52 Comments
odanny's picture

I can recommend another soldiers account worth reading. "Chasing Ghosts" by Paul Rieckhoff. Good look at a volunteer from NY who volunteered to serve in Iraq and was attached as an officer to a Florida NG unit and took part in the initial invasion. Later founded a website for vets: www.iava.org

Steven's picture

I fought in Iraq in '91, and in 2003-2004. I was in Anbar with the 3rd ACR. My experiences are very much in line with the author, as are my feelings. My anger at what has been done with my countries military is sometimes difficult to deal with. I pray for accountability for those who have done this, but have litle hope that I will see justice in my lifetime.

My friend, who was in the Guard when this war began, was among the first to step foot into Iraq. He was there for about 13 months.

I remember the night he came over to tell us he was being sent to Iraq. That day he had gotten the usual military hair cut. It was dark when he knocked on the door. I turned on the outside lights and opened the door. I knew as soon as I saw his haircut what he was about to say. He didn't have to say anything at all because the look on his face reinforced the appearance of the haircut. I just said, "Oh no." And he nodded his head. What followed that was a lot of hugging and me crying. As he walked slowly down the walkway toward his home, he turned around and said, "You know this whole thing is bullshit, don't you?" I said, yes I sure do. He turned fifty years old while he was in Iraq.

He didn't get injured in Iraq. He came home fine. Last year I got a call telling me he had died of a tumor.

Weaseldog's picture

pissed off patricia @ 3:

My friend, who was in the Guard when this war began, was among the first to step foot into Iraq. He was there for about 13 months.

I remember the night he came over to tell us he was being sent to Iraq. That day he had gotten the usual military hair cut. It was dark when he knocked on the door. I turned on the outside lights and opened the door. I knew as soon as I saw his haircut what he was about to say. He didn't have to say anything at all because the look on his face reinforced the appearance of the haircut. I just said, "Oh no." And he nodded his head. What followed that was a lot of hugging and me crying. As he walked slowly down the walkway toward his home, he turned around and said, "You know this whole thing is bullshit, don't you?" I said, yes I sure do. He turned fifty years old while he was in Iraq.

He didn't get injured in Iraq. He came home fine. Last year I got a call telling me he had died of a tumor.

I'm so sorry Patricia.

zugzug's picture

The lack of solid proof is why I never believed anything this admin ever said. And in retrospect it was all BS. I hear all the time about some terrorist warning & the country going to red alert over nothing. The intel always turns out to be BS. They'd be better off just posting all their "intel" on a website and letting us debunk it for them.

charles's picture

Check your links, they relate to EDNA issues.

CensoredFan's picture

pissed off patricia @ 3:

My friend, who was in the Guard when this war began, was among the first to step foot into Iraq. He was there for about 13 months.

I remember the night he came over to tell us he was being sent to Iraq. That day he had gotten the usual military hair cut. It was dark when he knocked on the door. I turned on the outside lights and opened the door. I knew as soon as I saw his haircut what he was about to say. He didn't have to say anything at all because the look on his face reinforced the appearance of the haircut. I just said, "Oh no." And he nodded his head. What followed that was a lot of hugging and me crying. As he walked slowly down the walkway toward his home, he turned around and said, "You know this whole thing is bullshit, don't you?" I said, yes I sure do. He turned fifty years old while he was in Iraq.

He didn't get injured in Iraq. He came home fine. Last year I got a call telling me he had died of a tumor.

That is horrible. Saying I'm sorry would do nothing, I know. Truly, truly sad.

Margaret's picture

I work at Wilford Hall and we are starting to get more and more long term disabilities folks from Iraq. I hear stories on a daily basis.

Also, I have zero use for anything coming from Americablog. Anything from Aravosis is suspect after the way he started throwing people under the bus last week.

Carmikl's picture

We pushed into Baghdad facing heavy resistance from the primarily Shiite populated cities in southern Iraq. It was strange being that the Shiites were Saddam's enemies who he had oppressed for decades. To me it was clear that they hated us more than Saddam because we were invaders from the west. Saddam might have been a horrible man, but we were worse in their eyes. It was frightening to realize that the people who Saddam murdered by the thousands actually preferred him to us.

Here's the point that we keep missing be it Iraq or Iran, people just don't like their having their country invaded. They'll fight back even if they hate their own government.

Weaseldog, you know, I was sadder that night before he left for Iraq than I was when I heard he had died. That night I didn't know what kind of hell he might be walking into in Iraq and how or if he would come home. Last year when I heard he had died, I knew it was a peaceful death and not one that had come far from home and perhaps all alone.

During the time he was in Iraq, CBS did a special about the soldiers over there and he was featured during one part of their show. I got to see him and hear his voice via my tv. After the show I sent an email to the CBS office in NY and thanked them for the show. Plus I told them what a great guy he was and what a wonderful friend he was. Someone at CBS sent that email to Iraq to their office there. Whomever received it looked up my friend and gave him a copy. He said when it was delivered to him the CBS person said to him, you must be a hell of a guy, the sender of this email thinks so.

Logan Murphy's picture

The links are now fixed. I used the link for the main page instead of linking directly to the story. Sorry for the problem.

Chris's picture

charles @ 6:

Check your links, they relate to EDNA issues.

What cracks me up is so many comment without even going to the link. Some just have the need to post even though they barely read what they posted aboiut.

charles's picture

Ooops, just scroll down. Sorry Logan. I'll get the hang of this computer stuff eventually.

Weaseldog's picture

My mouse wheel finger is tired now.

Ron's picture

I scrolled down and found it.

justabill's picture

charles @ 6:

Check your links, they relate to EDNA issues.

The first link has now been fixed (not the read more" yet), but it was just a few posts down the page, not a big deal. Let it scroll baby scroll.

Chris's picture

Good, its fixed.

One comment he made was -

"There was a mixed sentiment among the troops I had served with at the time. For some troops Bush's word was enough for them to go to Iraq to fight and die for what they believed was necessary for our country. There were some who didn't pay attention to the politics. They felt that they were soldiers who had no other option but to go to war and take their chances. In a sense, that is what good soldiers do."

In a democracy, good citizen-soldiers don't do that. Following a leader's order just because he is the leader is not healthy.They are shirking their duty as responsible citizens. I thought the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal made that pretty clear.

Logan Murphy's picture

justabill @ 16:

charles @ 6:

Check your links, they relate to EDNA issues.

The first link has now been fixed (not the read more" yet), but it was just a few posts down the page, not a big deal. Let it scroll baby scroll.

The "Read more" link is working now too. I like your attitude, let it scroll...

justabill's picture

Now both links are going straight to the post instead of just Americablog's homepage. It's a long post but definitely worth reading the rest. The intro posted here hardly does it justice.

I will fight for an end to this war with my last breath. We all must.

John Bruhns
Iraq Veteran

bravo!

seagull.girl's picture

This is the part that stunned me...the fact that this was occurring at the start of the invasion...imagine what our soldiers are going through now.

We pushed into Baghdad facing heavy resistance from the primarily Shiite populated cities in southern Iraq. It was strange being that the Shiites were Saddam's enemies who he had oppressed for decades. To me it was clear that they hated us more than Saddam because we were invaders from the west. Saddam might have been a horrible man, but we were worse in their eyes. It was frightening to realize that the people who Saddam murdered by the thousands actually preferred him to us.

Steve's picture

Damn phony soldier!

Erroll's picture

odanny @ 1:

I can recommend another soldiers account worth reading. "Chasing Ghosts" by Paul Rieckhoff. Good look at a volunteer from NY who volunteered to serve in Iraq and was attached as an officer to a Florida NG unit and took part in the initial invasion. Later founded a website for vets: www.iava.org

I suggest that you may want to find someone else to recommend who is against the war other than Rieckhoff. This quasi hawk is quite quick to criticize Bush's handling of the Iraq war/occupation but is loath to advocate that the U.S.withdraw its forces immediately from that slaughterhouse in Iraq. Just as egregiously, Rieckhoff has seen fit to slam and rip apart Lt. Ehren Watada, who has had the courage and common sense in saying that he will not be part of the occupation and brutalization and harassment and humiliation of the Iraqi people. Rieckhoff is not fit to stand in the shadow of someone like Lt. Watada and the members of the IVAW [Iraq Veterans Against the War]. Bring those troops home-alive and in one piece-now.

Swashbuckler's picture

"I guess if you repeat the same lies over and over again they begin to sound true."

Quite correct. Research has shown that to be true:

The experiments also highlight the difference between asking people whether they still believe a falsehood immediately after giving them the correct information, and asking them a few days later. Long-term memories matter most in public health campaigns or political ones, and they are the most susceptible to the bias of thinking that well-recalled false information is true.

The experiments do not show that denials are completely useless; if that were true, everyone would believe the myths. But the mind's bias does affect many people, especially those who want to believe the myth for their own reasons, or those who are only peripherally interested and are less likely to invest the time and effort needed to firmly grasp the facts.

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The research also highlights the disturbing reality that once an idea has been implanted in people's minds, it can be difficult to dislodge. Denials inherently require repeating the bad information, which may be one reason they can paradoxically reinforce it.

Indeed, repetition seems to be a key culprit. Things that are repeated often become more accessible in memory, and one of the brain's subconscious rules of thumb is that easily recalled things are true.

Many easily remembered things, in fact, such as one's birthday or a pet's name, are indeed true. But someone trying to manipulate public opinion can take advantage of this aspect of brain functioning. In politics and elsewhere, this means that whoever makes the first assertion about something has a large advantage over everyone who denies it later.
ad_icon

Furthermore, a new experiment by Kimberlee Weaver at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and others shows that hearing the same thing over and over again from one source can have the same effect as hearing that thing from many different people -- the brain gets tricked into thinking it has heard a piece of information from multiple, independent sources, even when it has not. Weaver's study was published this year in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/03/AR200709...

jojo's picture

"If lies are repeated many times people believe them " not true in this case. Most folks knew it was bullsh!t all over the world. We in America like wars and the firworks and killings that take place. It's our zealot media that needs a gooed clean out.
I stronly suggest to (Strongly Pissed off Patricia)to see the English documentry called
"Hidden War of Desert Stom ".Also a short clip CBC shown prior to the invasion 2003---US soldiers seen ran-saking,pilfering burned out Iraq cars with pikes and stripping the dead bodies of gold and hand guns to sell in flie Kuiwaite markets. The highway of DEATH--over 200,000 Fleeing Iraqies in 2 days were Slaughtered--now Patricia-maybe your tin soldier could have said no FKN way--Like I did :-(

justabill's picture

Chris @ 17:

Good, its fixed.

One comment he made was -

"There was a mixed sentiment among the troops I had served with at the time. For some troops Bush's word was enough for them to go to Iraq to fight and die for what they believed was necessary for our country. There were some who didn't pay attention to the politics. They felt that they were soldiers who had no other option but to go to war and take their chances. In a sense, that is what good soldiers do."

In a democracy, good citizen-soldiers don't do that. Following a leader's order just because he is the leader is not healthy.They are shirking their duty as responsible citizens. I thought the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal made that pretty clear.

Sorry, but an active duty soldier is very limited in what s/he can say or do to speak out. Just ask Lt. Watada. For those with families depending on them, destroying their military career is not really an option, nor the moral thing to do as long as they are not ordered to actually do something unlawful, but just being ordered to serve in a war zone, even a war based on lies, doesn't warrant leaving your spouse and kids to fend for themselves while your ass sits in Leavenworth. Soldiers must depend on civilians- mostly their political leaders and retirees, to be their voices.

PSToff's picture

A must read, indeed. Thank you and congratulations, John Bruhns, for so succinctly stating your views, and the truth, about the Iraq debacle.
One can only hope that after we turn off the tap on the Iraq catastrophe, and ALL of our troops come home, we turn our attention to making George 'Sadim' Bush accountable for his miserable, misbegotten malfeasance, by impeaching him.
('Sadim' because Bush has a reverse Midas touch, everything he says or does turns to sh*t)

Tim's picture

When are 'We The People' going to stand up for OUR Country and quit letting these people in power continue to do criminal governing? How many lies, lives, and loss of our freedoms will we stand? What the British did in the 1700s was a drop in the bucket to what this regime is doing to our people. What would Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, John Kennedy...etc do in this day? Revolution, I believe. Are we going to have a trademark after our country's name soon....United States of America Inccorporated. This government in power now is JUST PLAIN EVIL!

Ron's picture

Does RUSH LIMBAUGH think this guy is a phoney soldier?

Ruthless People's picture

Impeach Chimp/Cheney and send them to The Hague to answer for their war crimes and crimes against humanity.

AR's picture

seagull.girl @ 20:

This is the part that stunned me...the fact that this was occurring at the start of the invasion...imagine what our soldiers are going through now.

We pushed into Baghdad facing heavy resistance from the primarily Shiite populated cities in southern Iraq. It was strange being that the Shiites were Saddam's enemies who he had oppressed for decades. To me it was clear that they hated us more than Saddam because we were invaders from the west. Saddam might have been a horrible man, but we were worse in their eyes. It was frightening to realize that the people who Saddam murdered by the thousands actually preferred him to us.

Indeed, the insurgency was already in full swing even in the initial invasion, the hearts and minds of the people already lost.

nemo's picture

When I went through Army Basic at Ft. McClellan in 1982, we had a half-day's lecture on the laws of war...and what was an unlawful order as opposed to a lawful one. (Hint: Abu Ghraib was as effin' unlawful as it gets.) Pure Nuremberg stuff. We even had to sign a paper saying that we understood what we were taught...which went into our 201 files, 'just in case'. You can imagine why.

I put my ball on the roulette wheel (war with the Russkies or no war; place yer bets, folks, place yer bets!) and gave it a spin, proudly did my time, got a few commendations, and got out. Good thing, too, for with my MOS (54E30, Chemical Defense) I would have been in Desert Storm for sure. I haven't set foot on an Army base in almost 20 years, so I have no idea what these kids are being taught - officially and unofficially - nowadays, but some things like the Geneva Convention are meant to be inviolable.

But, historically, that usually only works in stand-up fights, not insurgencies. Which the brass had to have known...and disregarded for political reasons. And now those kids are paying the price. Damn Bush and his crew to the lowest ring of Dante's hell...

breakspear's picture

pissed off patricia @ 3:

My friend, who was in the Guard when this war began, was among the first to step foot into Iraq. He was there for about 13 months.

I remember the night he came over to tell us he was being sent to Iraq. That day he had gotten the usual military hair cut. It was dark when he knocked on the door. I turned on the outside lights and opened the door. I knew as soon as I saw his haircut what he was about to say. He didn't have to say anything at all because the look on his face reinforced the appearance of the haircut. I just said, "Oh no." And he nodded his head. What followed that was a lot of hugging and me crying. As he walked slowly down the walkway toward his home, he turned around and said, "You know this whole thing is bullshit, don't you?" I said, yes I sure do. He turned fifty years old while he was in Iraq.

He didn't get injured in Iraq. He came home fine. Last year I got a call telling me he had died of a tumor.

To your friend: Thank you for your service, sir. You were a TRUE American and human being.

...bush and cheney are the cause of much of the worlds sorrow now with this Iraq debacle. it is that simple.

OliverDreams's picture

There is only one way that we are going to get out of Iraq within the next 5 years.

Kucinich 08

Kucinich never voted to give Bush the authority to enter the Iraq war.
Kucinich never voted in favor of torture, warrantless spying on Americans or suspension of Habeas Corpus.
Kucinich promises immediate withdraw from Iraq.

Plus Kucinich wants to get Insurance companies out of the health care business with single payer nationalized health care.

Hillary and Obama admitted that they would still be in Iraq by the time their 1st term is completed in 2013! John Edwards was for a little faster time table.

Kucinich campaigned to get us out of Iraq in his 2004 presidential run, and he still is.

Hillary and Obama answer to our health care problems is to use your tax money to subsidize insurance companies, who eat up 30 percent of health care costs and still refuse treatments.

Help save America - Learn about Dennis Kucinich and spread the word at every opportunity.

The big business run media will be doing everything in their power to make sure Kucinich does not get his message out, or to predict there is no way he can win. Our only hope is a grass roots movement. And it has to be in the Democratic primaries.

Support the true candidate of the people - Kucinich 08

justabill's picture

How long will we be in Iraq?

Forever
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/055333.php

Straight Shooter's picture

John Bruhns speaks from his heart and soul, but I quibble over one of his statements:

It was a rough ride to Baghdad. Right from the start 150,000 troops were cluttered and stacked upon each other with our vehicles breaking down due to the harsh terrain of the southern Iraqi desert. We were in the middle of nowhere and out in the open. If there were ever a time for Saddam to use his weapons of mass destruction it would have been the perfect opportunity for him. We were in the perfect location for him to attack us -- out in the open desert with no other population. He could have launched the alleged stockpile of WMD directly upon the US military and killed no one but our troops. If bush really was convinced that Saddam had such a massive WMD arsenal why would he place us in the most vulnerable position for him to use them on us? Probably because bush knew they did not exist otherwise he never would have allowed such a stupid battle plan to take place.

Wrong. Whether bush believed they did exist or did not exist, is inconsequential to bush's thought processes. Saddam unleashing WMD on our troops, like cattle penned in a corral, would give bush the perfect excuse to drop a nuke on Iraq. No one at this point can truly kid themselves that bush wouldn't be willing to take that chance with the lives of our troops, because he knows at that point Americans would be so outraged that they would be screaming to turn Iraq into a glass parking lot. For someone like bush, who loves death and destruction (as evidenced by his life history), it would be his "crowning glory." If Saddam had WMD, bush wins. And even though it's been proven that Saddam didn't, bush still thinks he's winning.

justabill's picture

O.M.G.

I survived Blackwater
A former U.S. official received the security company's services -- and witnessed its disregard for Iraqi lives.

When the Iraqi government last month demanded the expulsion of Blackwater USA, the private security firm, I had one reaction: It's about time.

As a U.S. official in Baghdad for nearly two years, I was frequently the "beneficiary" of Blackwater's over-the-top zeal. "Just pretend it's a roller coaster," I used to tell myself during trips through downtown Baghdad.

We would careen around corners, jump road dividers, reach speeds in excess of 100 mph and often cross over to the wrong side of the street, oncoming traffic be damned.

But much more appalling than the ride was the deleterious effect each movement through town had on the already beleaguered people of Iraq. I began to wonder whether my meetings, intended to further U.S. policy goals and improve the lives of Iraqis, were doing more harm than good. With our drivers honking at, cutting off, pelting with water bottles (a favorite tactic) and menacing with weapons anyone in their way, how many enemies were we creating?

One particularly infuriating time, I was in the town of Irbil in northern Iraq, being driven to a meeting with a Kurdish political leader. We were on a narrow stretch of highway with no shoulders and foot-high barriers on both sides. The lead Suburban in our convoy loomed up behind an old, puttering sedan driven by an older man with a young woman and three children.

As we approached at typical breakneck speed, the Blackwater driver honked furiously and motioned to the side, as if they should pull over. The kids in the back seat looked back in horror, mouths agape at the sight of the heavily armored Suburbans driven by large, armed men in dark sunglasses. The poor Iraqi driver frantically searched for a means of escape, but there was none. So the lead Blackwater vehicle smashed heedlessly into the car, pushing it into the barrier. We zoomed by too quickly to notice if anyone was hurt. ....

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-gans6oct06,0,698626...

Paul's picture

If we are going to end this war/occupation, it looks to me that we are going to have to evict every Republican and every DINO/Corporatist "Democrat" as their seats come open. It would also be a huge mistake to elect as president anybody who will not end this atrocity unconditionally upon taking the oath of office. These alleged top 3 candidates are a gigantic disappointment to me. I will not vote for any ticket that contains their names.

I consider Bush and crew to be war criminals. I am prepared to hold the same sentiments about any Democrat who refuses to aggressively act to end this nightmare.

anon's picture

War is an act of national survival. war (small w) is not. This is not a War.

The second World War was an act of national survival subsequent to a provocation against the Japanese. Since WWII, the military has been used repeatedly as a tool of national policy NOT national defense. Today, the situation has deteriorated to the point that the military is being used to satisfy a personal whim by a roque president.

The US owned the pacific in the 1800's. Many people dont realize that. The rise of japan industrial power and military in the early 20th century prompted the US to block Japan from its needed source of energy - oil - needed to drive its growing industrial base. The result - War.

What Bush is doing now, has the potential of depriving China from a needed source of energy - oil - needed to fuel its growing industrial base. The result could and likely would be War.

See a pattern here? I do.

I dont think this is War ... I think it is the act of a madman which will lead to War.

Get ready for what is coming .... a struggle for national survival .... if Bush's madness goes wrong and triggers a response.

konchster's picture

God Bless you young man for your unswerving patriotism in discharging your duty as an American Serviceman and reporting to us at home the need to end this madness Especially scary was the part of being stranded and at the mercy of the WMDs which thank God for your sake and 150,000 other young men and women turned out to be bullshit or camel shit which ever

Acting Patriotic's picture

Oil men who own war companies...making war in oil countries!

Why...WE... fight.

Old Dood's picture

Yes this is one of the best detailed accounts of this war over the last 5 years I have ever read.

You know down deep that this man has seen the truth and it is setting him free...

volum's picture

I have a hard time listening to soldiers.

Our military hasn't been used for anything positive in my lifetime, and for any enlistee to think differently doesn't show much foresight or understanding of history. Maybe more people need to understand the history of our country before they want to sign up to die for it.

This is pure Nuremburg stuff. This was an illegal invasion, and anyone who knew it, yet still went over there to kill, has no legitimacy in my eyes.

BaScOmBe's picture

pissed off patricia @ 3:

My friend, who was in the Guard when this war began, was among the first to step foot into Iraq. He was there for about 13 months.

I remember the night he came over to tell us he was being sent to Iraq. That day he had gotten the usual military hair cut. It was dark when he knocked on the door. I turned on the outside lights and opened the door. I knew as soon as I saw his haircut what he was about to say. He didn't have to say anything at all because the look on his face reinforced the appearance of the haircut. I just said, "Oh no." And he nodded his head. What followed that was a lot of hugging and me crying. As he walked slowly down the walkway toward his home, he turned around and said, "You know this whole thing is bullshit, don't you?" I said, yes I sure do. He turned fifty years old while he was in Iraq.

He didn't get injured in Iraq. He came home fine. Last year I got a call telling me he had died of a tumor.

my deepest and sincerest condolences. I'll remember your friend in my prayers.

If you pray, please remember my two cousins, one on his fourth tour of Iraq, the other on his first tour (part of the SURGE) after three in Afghanistan.

Mark N.'s picture

I consider Bush and crew to be war criminals.

And the only way we are ever going to regain any credibility in the eyes of the world after this will be by prosecuting and convicting those who rammed this phony war down our throats as war criminals.

Otherwise, what was started over there in our name will never end.

Upon conviction, Bush, Cheney and company should be turned over to those who will make sure that the abstract concept of "torture" becomes a very real and concrete concept to them indeed.

navyswan's picture

volum @ 40:

I have a hard time listening to soldiers.

Our military hasn't been used for anything positive in my lifetime, and for any enlistee to think differently doesn't show much foresight or understanding of history. Maybe more people need to understand the history of our country before they want to sign up to die for it.

This is pure Nuremburg stuff. This was an illegal invasion, and anyone who knew it, yet still went over there to kill, has no legitimacy in my eyes.

Unfortunately, they get them young. 17 or 18 right out of the worst highschools in America. And then they are brainwashed in bootcamp and thereon. They go from parental brainwashing straight to military brainwashing. And, it is no secret that our schools do not teach history. And I am pretty sure that the military doesn't talk about Nuremberg anymore. These kids have never had to think for themselves. And then they become adults that have never had to think for themselves.

navyswan's picture

justabill @ 24:

Chris @ 17:

Good, its fixed.

One comment he made was -

"There was a mixed sentiment among the troops I had served with at the time. For some troops Bush's word was enough for them to go to Iraq to fight and die for what they believed was necessary for our country. There were some who didn't pay attention to the politics. They felt that they were soldiers who had no other option but to go to war and take their chances. In a sense, that is what good soldiers do."

In a democracy, good citizen-soldiers don't do that. Following a leader's order just because he is the leader is not healthy.They are shirking their duty as responsible citizens. I thought the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal made that pretty clear.

Sorry, but an active duty soldier is very limited in what s/he can say or do to speak out. Just ask Lt. Watada. For those with families depending on them, destroying their military career is not really an option, nor the moral thing to do as long as they are not ordered to actually do something unlawful, but just being ordered to serve in a war zone, even a war based on lies, doesn't warrant leaving your spouse and kids to fend for themselves while your ass sits in Leavenworth. Soldiers must depend on civilians- mostly their political leaders and retirees, to be their voices.

I am glad not everyone thinks like you do. I am glad that there are people like Lt. Watada that do the moral thing, even if it is the harder thing to do. Sometimes you have to suffer for doing the right thing, and it takes a strong person to do it.

swap's picture

If we are going to end this war/occupation, it looks to me that we are going to have to evict every Republican and every DINO/Corporatist “Democrat” as their seats come open.

I don't think this is do-able by votes alone. America is not awake enough yet; opposition candidates can't compete with the millions incumbents raise (and even if they were successful, I'd fear for them every time they flew); and the voting machines are too easily rigged. Someday it may come down to 10 or 20 million of us - civilian and military alike -descending on Washington, DC and non-violently escorting these officials from their offices. The system is now so rigged against the little guy, that I don't see any other way out.

Erroll's picture

#43-navyswan

Well said. The military and the country needs more people like Lt. Watada who are willing to stand up and risk being ostracized for speaking the truth. As the lieutenant said at the Veterans for Peace convention in Seattle in 2006:

"The American soldier must rise above the socialization that tells them authority should always be obeyed without question. Rank should be respected but never blindly obeyed."

Jerry's picture

anon @ 36:

War is an act of national survival. war (small w) is not. This is not a War.

The second World War was an act of national survival subsequent to a provocation against the Japanese. Since WWII, the military has been used repeatedly as a tool of national policy NOT national defense. Today, the situation has deteriorated to the point that the military is being used to satisfy a personal whim by a roque president.

The US owned the pacific in the 1800's. Many people dont realize that. The rise of japan industrial power and military in the early 20th century prompted the US to block Japan from its needed source of energy - oil - needed to drive its growing industrial base. The result - War.

What Bush is doing now, has the potential of depriving China from a needed source of energy - oil - needed to fuel its growing industrial base. The result could and likely would be War.

See a pattern here? I do.

I dont think this is War ... I think it is the act of a madman which will lead to War.

Get ready for what is coming .... a struggle for national survival .... if Bush's madness goes wrong and triggers a response.

Talk about putting two and two together! Thank you. What better way to stay top-dog, than to eliminate the competition. That is what this is all about. Keeping AmeriKa the top-dog. Why not go for global domination since they are going to to all the trouble.

ysbaddaden's picture

How much of America's war-whoring is uniquely our government, and how much of it's corporationist?

Afterall, we seem to be turning all our nation's sovreignty over to world trade organizations.

[...] the rest of this great post here [...]

odanny's picture

Erroll @ 22:

odanny @ 1:

I can recommend another soldiers account worth reading. "Chasing Ghosts" by Paul Rieckhoff. Good look at a volunteer from NY who volunteered to serve in Iraq and was attached as an officer to a Florida NG unit and took part in the initial invasion. Later founded a website for vets: www.iava.org

I suggest that you may want to find someone else to recommend who is against the war other than Rieckhoff. This quasi hawk is quite quick to criticize Bush's handling of the Iraq war/occupation but is loath to advocate that the U.S.withdraw its forces immediately from that slaughterhouse in Iraq. Just as egregiously, Rieckhoff has seen fit to slam and rip apart Lt. Ehren Watada, who has had the courage and common sense in saying that he will not be part of the occupation and brutalization and harassment and humiliation of the Iraqi people. Rieckhoff is not fit to stand in the shadow of someone like Lt. Watada and the members of the IVAW [Iraq Veterans Against the War]. Bring those troops home-alive and in one piece-now.

I agree with you if Rieckhoff was willing to turn on Watada like that. What exceptional courage displayed by Watada.

Rieckhoff slamming him? I liked his book but if that is true I have little respect for someone who only wants to go 'half ass' in protesting this war.

Seems he wants to regain some standing in the military community. However, I have heard many ex military with an ingrained sense of "duty" say they dont respect Watada, which to me is completely wrong. Those who respect Watada do so very deeply.

Comments are closed on this entry