Bill O'Reilly: Facts have a far left bias; Iran is still a threat, you libs!
Download | play 
Download | play (h/t Heather for the vids)
Ah...good ol' Bill O'Reilly. Colbert couldn't have channeled Papa Bear more perfectly than the way the man himself embraces the truthiness of his Talking Points Memo. For despite the fact that the NIE has contradicted the assertions made by Bush and Cheney, it's the pesky far left who are the problem for Falafel Boy. After all, we're so busy being happy that Bush was wrong that we're ignoring the threat that Iran continues to be with their nuclear enrichment program.
Download | play Download | play
And what better "expert" to prove you're right than to bring on John Bolton, who will happily smear the intelligence agencies and anyone else in the way to continue to assert the neo-cons' claim that Iran represents a nuclear threat.
and the truth is so far up billo's butt that even he can't find it with a shovel.
John Bolton is the lowest of slimy slugs.
Two of the biggest pieces of human garbage on the planet.
While not entirely invalidating the presence of God, their lives completely substantiate the existence of Satan.
drtoxic @ 3:
On the same show.
Can I bring myself to watch this nonsense?
can Bush or Billo give any factual reasons for their assertions about Iran? AT ALL? "Because I say so" is not a fact that supports their argument and isn't good enough for thinking adults.
I mean, look at the Commander In Chimp yesterday:
"Iran is, continues to be, always wuz a threat...". In what WAY, you chump? Do you have any reason to believe this beyond your uneducated, ill-informed opinion? Please, share!
Great Flying Spaghetti Monster...these people are worse than children.
what a ass!
O'Really and Bolton in the same room? I pity the poor FOX cameramen, the stench must have been overwhelming.
Wow - the right throw O'Lielly a bone and it's BOLTON!
Is he going to take that sitting down?
I'm still waiting for falafal man's head to explode.
Any minute now - watch for it . . . .
*
If the report is accurate, perhaps "shock and awe" did the job there as in Lybia in 2003.
And if the report is inaccurate, we are in danger of relying on it.
And finally, how does it help us vis a vis negotiation with Iran to take the THREAT of military strike off the table -- it takes away an important bargaining punch.
The upshot is that release of this report paralizes and weakens us in dealing with Iran -- albeit perhaps it does weaken Bush which perhaps is the more important goal here.
I can appreciate that to many, Bush is the far greater enemy than Ahmadenajad.
dadams @ 1:
According to Andrea's court documents, he's got a battery operated device that impedes the retrieval process.
*
Didn't we used to have facilities in this country to put people like Bolton in so they weren't a danger to the public?
In Billlo's world, Busholini speaks directly w/god, so how could he not be telling the truth?
Unhappily, O'Reilly and Bolton's take is not much different than Obama's.
Obama's first reaction to this report was to say that Iran continues to be a "threat" to
"some" of its neighbors. His evidence for this was that Iran "supports" Hamas and Hezbollah.
Great. The liberals' dream. Obama: the fresh face with the same old conservative bullshit.
I should also note that the New York Times was also on both sides of the fence today.
"Bush was wrong - but Iran is a danger". They, as Obama, want to keep playing both sides of the
issue. They're bound to come out right if they take a firm stand on both sides of an issue involving
war and peace and life and death.
Funny how the neo cons don't harp on the fact that while Iran was agreed to IAEA inspections, Israel, India and Pakistan never have.
Somewhere really needs to ask him "who placed G.W. at the bow and named him "King of the World"?
Terrible @ 12:
Yes, but Raygun cut gov't funding so HE couldn't be locked away.
Bill, face it, you can't defend this imbecile this time. The far left didn't lie to the country, Pres. Caligula did. We "far left" are just happy that the truth is coming out. You are one sorry ass mother fucker.
ted @ 10:
Ahhhhh... the old truth weakens us ploy...
bill o'really's head is so far up his ass, every time he takes a whizz, he has to wipe his eyes out afterwards.
Seriously dude, these two guys are so repulsive I can't possibly bring myself to watch this.
Bush Administration, "Our intelligence community is completely unreliable, except in the cases where we're able to cherry-pick information to further a policy that we already believe in regardless of the available intelligence, and have all of our claims disproven over time. In those rare circumstances, our intelligence is to be believed at face value. Any time the intelligence community has a different opinion from the one we want them to have, their opinion is to be discredited and their motivations questioned."
Ah, yes, the "fair and balanced" O'Racist and Faux has been giving the consistently factually-handicapped Bolton free reign for two days now. Go Figure. Bolton is now claiming that the NIE is anti-dubyah and the NIE is "wrong". Reich-wing conspiracy theories are better than a cup of coffee.
ted @ 10:
Great logic there, ted. Only believe intelligence reports if they paint the direst possible picture. If they don't, then we should act as if they did. You're a real 29-percenter.
"If they're wrong about Iraq, I'll never trust the Bush administration again. ...Oh, who am I kidding?"
Bonkers @ 6:
Do NOT take the FSM's name in vain!
Bill, YOU are unamerican.
You dispicable, disgusting, and horrifying. You ruin my day everytime I see your smug face on TV or the internet.
A pile of shit for a human being.
He should be tried and hanged for treason. Only then I would I feel that there is some bit of decency returned to this world.
So will we see some pushback from the intel agencies over this? Bushco seems to be painting them as wrong and too stupid to trust anyway.
ted @ 10:
You can thank your boys Dick and Bush for Ahmadenajad. I seem to remember hearing something about Iran offering to help in Afghanistan, and making other offers that got Bolton's panties in a wad. Anybody who thinks "Schlock and Awww" did anything other than create a giant catastrofuck has watched entirely too much O'Lielly.
It's disgusting, watching O'Reilly and Bolton at the same table.
It's like watching two baboons masturbating.
Bonkers @ 6:
children are more honest than anyone in the bushco administration. remember bush is trying to do away with the children of America by starving them and denying them health care.
Anthology @ 14:
You're right, and I think this is the last straw. I think I just decided on Edwards. He seems to be seeing everything clearly now, since he was out of the game for a little while. Kinda like Al Gore lite, but thinner and with much better hair.
Preacher Boob @ 30:
Not 'like', is.
In reich-wing world:
*Even though Iraq didn't have WMD, couldn't attack America, didn't attack America, and did not want to attack America, the Iraq war is "justified"
*Even though Iran doesn't have WMD, didn't attack America, and does not want to attack America, we should still fear Iran and consider military action against Iran.
Reich-wingers really are the lowest common-denominator in society.
When Tweety and Scarborough both say that Bush is a liar, maybe there's a scintilla of hope that all is not lost just yet.
goatsage @ 33:
Hey, there's nothing sad or dangerous about baboons masturbating.
Preacher Boob@30 Man that's awful and funny! You have one fucked up imagination!
These 2 guys better get confirm that GW/Darth & Co. are keeping note of what they are doing for them...
for rest of us we know what they are.....
Dave Flores @ 21:
I'm with you 1000% on that one
Preacher Boob @ 30:
Actually, I'd RATHER watch two baboons masturbate. At least what they're doing doesn't involve fakery or lying or artifice.
And they're probably much smarter and more diplomatic than those two.
You know, the NeoCon zionists love war so much, it's too bad we ended World War II so soon. They might have enjoyed another few years to observe it.
Perhaps I spoke too soon, when I said we were't going to war.
Couldn't even make it through the whole thing. Must bathe...
Nope, not gonna watch it. Watching it would be like looking in the litter box and being surprised to see cat shit there. I know what they are going to say and all their bs, so rather than get all pissy about it, I'll pass. :)
Left&Left @ 37:
It gets me through the nights, and most days.
Well, if the report is true, than something caused or factored into Iran dropping its military nuke plans in '03. Could the Administration get any credit for that?
And, if the report is untrue, why can we just rely on the reports that hamper the Administration, yet not rely on reports which may help the Administration?
Yes, yes, Ahmadenajad can still breathe,
therefore they have the capability to think, and
therefore they have the potential to develop nuclear weapon in the future,
therefore they have the potential and capability to destroy us in the future,
therefore it is in our right to protect ourselves in the future from such an attack,
therefore we must prevent them from the having the capability to think and develop nucular weapon in the future,
therefore we must attack them now !!!!
Republican - Neanderthal single-issue thinking that gets you results.
Are the Average Joe American, this stupid ?!
O'Reilly holds the USA to no accountability? Has he never studied history or read a book?
He really is a propagandist clown.
Bolton was just on AAR with Thom Hartmann. He basically declared that the Bush Admin was the victim of a coup by the Intelligence Agencies, providing false information and jeopardizing National Security just to embarrass President Bush.
But when asked if Bush will fire them or charge them with Treason, Bolton quickly backpedaled.
[FIFY-Sitemonitor]
You can tell Billy and the rest of the neo-duds are fuming at this report....who will they be able to pick on now?!
Anthology @ 14:
I don't think Obama or the NY Times is playing both sides of the issue. The religious hard-liners running Iran are bad guys and they do support terrorists -- with money and arms. They just aren't the threat that Bush would have us believe they are.
Bolton is good for one thing and one thing only. He's good at sticking his head up the president's ass and telling us about the view. Otherwise, he's a waste of space and time.
Mugsy @ 48:
(That should read "providing", not "proving". Sorry.)
[FIFY in your OP, Mugsy-Sitemonitor]
Bolton and O'Reilly together - I'm surprised the earth didn't open up a swallow them. Is this part of 'we create reality now'?
wild idea @ 46:
Actually, Neanderthals were much smarter and much more adaptable than the Thugs.
Here's what conservatives used to use to counter what they saw as a hostile culture:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pi_u-V4pWAM&feature=related
I wonder what Simon Cowell would say to him?
They are so detached from rational thinking that they can go from arguing that we have to attack because Iran is working on a bomb to we have to attack before Iran starts to work on a bomb in under 24 hours. Pretty impressive; delusional, but impressive.
Eric Almighty @ 29:
I agree with you and, wasn't it a Now episode, or elsewhere on PBS... That Iran was with us after 9/11, but when the invasion of Iraq started Iran got scared, fearful of being attacked, and elected a "powerful" leader? Therefore didn't we create Ahmadenajad?
By mistake or was it part of the "spreading democracy across the middle east"
Not that I wan't to see anyone hurt, nor do I condone terrorism....BUUUUT, had Billo's studio blown up while those two schmucks were together...I would have lost NO sleep!
Does that make me a bad person? ;)
So according to O'Liey the NIE was gathered this summer about what happened 4 years ago. Bush was talking about WWIII just a few weeks ago. So what Intel was Bush using to make his statements a few weeks ago? Is Bush in a need to know basis? Do they tell him lies so he can give speeches that directly contradict the facts? Again we have to come to the conclusion that ether Bush is a lying sack of crap or too dumb to be told anything more than just enough to give a speech. I think both.
Seems to me that it's good to know that Iran isn't building nukes. Why isn't that a good thing? If we keep pissing with them they may well decide to start building them again. I would think this is an excellent time to try to start a little dialog and diplomacy. Or it would be if people like these two would shut the hell up.
miss_kitty @ 39:
http://progressives.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/bonobos.jpg
Is there such a thing as the Close Left? If you're left, it's far left. Apparently to these douchebags, no one's in the middle. Everyone's "far left." Far from what? The Far Right?
This is ridiculous.
You know as upset as we may get at the audacity and their bicycle-helmet-at-the-dinner-table-wearing justifications for more saber rattling, at this point I honestly think we can just sit back and let them keep talking. They are literally looking more and more retarded as the days go on. If they keep it up at the current pace, I truly believe they will finally be laughed into obscurity. Speaking about the pundits of course.
As far as BushCo's attempt at a sequel to their last eff-up, Biden already said on national TV that he'll be impeached if he tries. Right now, my eight year old son has more political clout than bonnie prince Georgie does. And he's even got better ideas for foreign policy too as evidenced by his "Take Ahmadinejad to Chuck E. Cheese" proposal he sent to the president.
The point is, I really think it might have stopped being painful right HERE IN THIS moment. Maybe we can start laughing now guys? I mean, yes there was always the conceptual hilarity this whole time in that there was a drunken trustifarian with the IQ of a light salad dressing in charge of the country. But now I believe it's true subjective hilarity, which is good for all of us.
miss_kitty @ 39:
And they have quite colorful behinds too, lol!!!
Bush is issuing ultimatums:
OMAHA, Neb. - President Bush, trying to keep pressure on Iran, called on Tehran Wednesday to "come clean" about the scope of its nuclear activities or else face diplomatic isolation.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071205/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush
Remember when he demanded this of Iraq?
Now it is Iran's job to prove a negative. Which is logically impossible.
Perhaps Bush can prove that he doesn't have plans to detonate a nuclear weapon and kill millions of Americans in Washington DC, when he leaves office?
ysbaddaden @ 61:
http://progressives.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/bonobos.jpg
Bonobos aren't baboons...and that picture was not masturbation, either!
:lol:
More Examples of Savage Capitalism at the Cost of Human Suffering...in the US.
This is a link to several examples of recent globalism crimes by the US in other nations as well as two recent coporate welfare scams just recently coming to light in the US.
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/more-recent-examples-of-savag...
This what these bastards have done in Iraq, Iran, Chile, Indonesia, China, and here.
Impeach to end globalization.
Jane Fonda!
It's surprising that Billo didn't mention Chappaquiddick or the Clenis.
O'Reilly is right! ('god', it pains me to say that) But he nailed it!
Rumors, prevarications, and misplaced faith are all on the side of the NeoCon Zionist conservative right.
It's just truth, facts, reality and rationality that are on the side of the left.
Boy, the scales of justice are just equally balanced, aren't they?
Especially if you're a CrazyChristianEvangelisticFundamentalistBornAgainBoobZionistRapturisticIdiot.
miss_kitty @ 66:
Bonobos aren't baboons...and that picture was not masturbation, either!
:lol:
Why is it when I see pictures of apes like this in flagrente delicto I hear this recurring?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18TLHhhHZCA
When the US deals with the Iranians it's wise to apply the Reagan doctrine: Trust but Verify.
ysbaddaden @ 70:
You're such a sophisticate!!! I, on the other hand, hear this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTW8oUV8Aq0
miss_kitty @ 72:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1ArZEFwRsY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0oALRL7uyY
You are driving in the country during a blizzard. You come upon 2 guys walking wearing only shorts and golf shirts. Naturally you offer them a life saving ride. O'Reilly gets in the front seat Bolton in the back. Both wet and shivering O'Reilly pipes up, "It was warm here very recently and the heat is only well hidden. Bolton yells from the back over the tunes "We cannot trust our left leaning senses on this one. It has been warm here and we all know it. History has taught us it will be again."
You get to a stop sign and kick them both out to perish.
Coming soon bill o'really will do this on his show:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY-03vYYAjA&feature=related
Preacher Boob @ 30:
You know they were tuggin' on each other underneath that desk. Hey Bill... Got Milk? Oh wait... thats not a milk mustache.
Both those guys are total waste of space on the planet. They will happily, in spite of facts, logic, or humanity, flush this country down the toilet in pursuit of their idealogical agenda.
Preacher Boob @ 30:
Those two morons don't have sense enuf to masturbate.
Why isn't O'Reilly living in a dumpster somewhere, eating cold popcorn shrimp from a dirty pie plate and wearing a stained overcoat?
What he and Limbaugh do is keep flogging the fear. It is these guys who pussify this Nation.
I hear he's Republican:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-MM__7Im6k
Well, if the report is true, than something caused or factored into Iran dropping its military nuke plans in '03. Could the Administration get any credit for that?
------------------------------------------------------------------
response: Applying the GOP standard time lag for responsibility, if Clinton is to blame for 9-11 then he should probably get the credit for this as well.
------------------------------------------------------------------
And, if the report is untrue, why can we just rely on the reports that hamper the Administration, yet not rely on reports which may help the Administration?
------------------------------------------------------------------
response: Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice...er...um... won't get fooled agin!
Wasn't O'really going to not believe the Bush administration ever again if they didn't find wmdeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees in Iraq?
It's times like these when I would REALLY like to see an effective federal FAIRNESS DOCTRINE to put a leash on the way this story is getting SPIN-ERATED.
Yes, Sean, I said FAIRNESS DOCTRINE, and I'll say it again, FAIRNESS DOCTRINE.
Who the hell still listens to this man's crap? Or Bolton, Coulter, Kristol or any other war monger who has been caught lying er.....mistaken on every statement that they have EVER made regarding the middle east. It's you idiots that still listen to this drivel that keeps this jerk on the air.....STOP IT FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!
bob @ 82:
he lied.
Hans Blix on the NIE
AP:
Blix said the U.S. agencies likely acted because they heard all the rhetoric of World War III and either we have the Iranian bomb or we have the bombing of Iran.
The report on Iran followed an inaccurate 2002 assessment by U.S. intelligence of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program.
«The intelligence services got a lot of blame for the invasion of Iraq that they had exaggerated what they saw ,» Blix said. «This time they do not want to carry the responsibility.
He said he didn't know what evidence the U.S. intelligence agencies have that proves the Iranians abandoned their weapons program.
Blix, who formerly headed the International Atomic Energy Agency, said that's further than the IAEA has gone.
«The IAEA doesn't say there is nothing. They simply say we have not seen any evidence of it,» he said. «Proving the negative is very difficult if at all possible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NIE: An Abrupt About-Face
As many recognize, the latest NIE on Iran’s nuclear weapons program directly contradicts what the U.S. Intelligence Community was saying just two years previously. And it appears that this about-face was very recent. How recent?
Consider that on July 11, 2007, roughly four or so months prior to the most recent NIE’s publication, Deputy Director of Analysis Thomas Fingar gave the following testimony before the House Armed Services Committee (emphasis added):
Iran and North Korea are the states of most concern to us. The United States’ concerns about Iran are shared by many nations, including many of Iran’s neighbors. Iran is continuing to pursue uranium enrichment and has shown more interest in protracting negotiations and working to delay and diminish the impact of UNSC sanctions than in reaching an acceptable diplomatic solution. We assess that Tehran is determined to develop nuclear weapons--despite its international obligations and international pressure. This is a grave concern to the other countries in the region whose security would be threatened should Iran acquire nuclear weapons.
- - - -
The inconsistencies are more troubling when we realize that, according to the Wall Street Journal, Thomas Fingar is one of the three officials who were responsible for crafting the latest NIE. The Journal cites "an intelligence source" as describing Fingar and his two colleagues as "hyper-partisan anti-Bush officials." (The New York Sun drew attention to one of Fingar’s colleagues yesterday.)
O'Reilly's nothing but a demagogue, if anyones deviding America right now it's him and his neo-con buddies not Jane Fonda, this targeting of individuals and branding them traitors is something the nazis used to do.
Question: If the USA was under siege by another country 15,000 miles away and Canada sent in fighters and weapons to help out (we are the neighbour after all) would that be ok? Of course and the bad guys would expect it. It all has to do with who would Canada rather have as their neighbours in the long term. Same here boys and girls.
One predominately muslim country would like to have muslims as their neighbours and not Christians especially when they are from the USA and in the back pocket of Israel.
Maybe it's just to simple.
my god it's so hard watching Billo and Bolton without wanting to put my foot through my computer.
I cuoldnt watch this shit. I lasted 45 or so seconds.I hope I live long enough to see all these cretins hang.
Who in their right mind would even tune in to Fox let alone listen or give ANY credibility to anything Oreilly says. He is a ZERO. I think every last single bush appeaser should be locked up and sentenced to a life of servitude to the people of the US, Iraq and Afghanistan for all the pain and suffering they have dished out the past 7 years.
andy @ 89:
Imagine Coulter sitting in on the show and making it a hat trick. Sorry...I just realized I might've lost the blog board while they've gone to upchuck at the thought.
mrogi @ 71:
Nitpicking here, but don't give Senile Republican Jesus more credit than he deserves.
Doveryay, no proveryay. (Trust, but verify.)
-Lenin
As Stephen Colbert once said "Reality has a well known liberal bais"
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-869183917758574879
O'Reilly and Bolton, put them on a boat and sink it.
Somebody should inform Bill that the Shah of Iran started Iran on the road to getting nuclear power plants back in the mid 1960's aseven then he knew that oil was a finite resource.
Ray was full of b.s. Gorbachev kept trying and trying to get him back to the bargaining table, but Ray Gun insisted there was no way of verifing they were disarming.
Then a college class of seismologists went to Russia with US permission, and with Russian assistance proved you could tell if underground testing was occurring (the Soviets favorite way of testing) by using seismograph equipment, making Ray Gun look like an obstructionist fool.
Of course as soon as they came back, some reichwingers insisted on calling them traitors and demanding their arrest, trial and conviction, not necessarily in that order.
Bush is far more than just a liar. He's walking in 25th Amendment territory.
All the more reason to impeach Cheney now.
Arthur Silber pointed out -- correctly -- that intelligence estimates rarely
if ever determine whether or not war happens. War comes from policy,
however deranged it may be. And God help us, we have a "war president".
...
HERE YOU HAVE IT.... TAKE A LOOK AND REMEMBER TO TELL YOUR CHILDREN
----------------- YOU SAW THE ORIGONAL BOLT-ON TOOL
I just watched Bolton's interview.
This guy is a complete idiot that manages to f**k up any thing he touches and a congenital liar to boot; him and O'Reilley are a great match!
Hey Bolton you dork!
I somehow doubt that the mullahs are popping champagne cork now or ever.
They are Islamic and alcohol is forbidden for them.
YOu da man Billy!
Would you send me an autographed pic of yourself so I can put it on my holiday tree?
ted @ 45:
Yes, it was the Europeans, using (gasp) diplomacy. An unheard of technique in bushco circles. And no the bu$h administration does not get credit for that!
goatsage @ 33:
Too funny - I damned near plotzed.
I saw Biden's comments. WOW!! Go Biden.....
Anyway, ever hear Rush, Hannity and their ilk go on and on about how toxic to the Dems any success in Iraq would be to them politically? Well...work with me here...This is the SAME THING for the Repubs. Absolutely toxic politcally. You should hear these assholes going off about the intel community and how inept they are. I mean Hell's Bell's, it's only a report by 16 intel agencies. What can those spy guys possibly know that Rush doesn't? Oh, and try and get through to Rush's show and explain that to him. No fucking way.
This guy is so A-typical I can see why the country is doing it what it is !
bolton is another INCOMPETANT Bush stooge
Why do Bill O'Reilly and John Bolton hate America???
People cheered when they found out that the intelligence was wrong on Iraq? I must have missed that. I wonder where Bolton was when he heard the cheers. But Orally was right about hearing "Bush lied again, he's an idiot again", because he did and he is.
These two idiots try to come off as intellectuals,especially when Orally calls him "Mr. Ambassador". Puh-leeze... But if Bolton wants
to really hear cheers,they'll be coming in one year,one month,15days and 13 hours on Jan. 20th.
Would someone please ask the right question: is Iran more, less or the same nuclear threat to the US now that we know it stopped its nuclear weapons program 4 years ago?? Saying Iran is simply a "threat" entirely misses the point.
If Bush or Bill-O think Iran poses the same level of nuclear threat to the US despite this new intelligence assessment, then logically they must think that Iran's development or non-development of nuclear weapons is entirely irrelevant to the issue which, of course, make them look like looneys.
Good grief.
Iran is still as big a threat as ever - to the PNAC Charter.
mrogi @ 71:
Actually, the Reagan doctrine was z-z-z-z-z-z-zz-(snort,) huh??.Oh,.. Mr Gorbachev tear down that wall-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-
Assuming he lives that long, in ten years we're gonna be watching O'Reilly going nuts about whether Monaco or Lichtenstein is the greater threat to the peace and stability of the American Empire.
mercy,, too much bolton..
Dennis @ 86:
Yes... quote the "non-partisan" PNAC-kingpin-Kristol-edited-murdoch-funded-neocon-bible.
According to Mark Musetti (sp) New York Times... the current NIE of the 16 agencies was much more thoroughly vetted and is based on more solid intel than that of 2005. It is a product of the new intelligence community.
O'Reilly never met a war he didn't want other peoples relatives to fight. His authoritarian cultism knows no bounds
John Bolton. Wasn't he reported to be a swinger at the infamous Plato's Retreat club in the 1970's?
Can you imagine??? YIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIKES!!!
And yes, why would O'Reilly and Bolton believe the findings of the NIE? I guess it is all part of a vast left wing conspiracy. Idiots.
blah blah @ 113:
So Hans Blix is not to be trusted, cherry-picked data is now ok, and our new intelligence community is totally accurate? Am I forgetting anything?
Oh yes, the New York Times is to be believed in cases where they are in agreement with you, but not in those times when they're not, like when they report that the surge is working. I think I'm following you. Taking me a while, but I think it's starting to set in.
Yeah, right, Bill. Reality is biased towards the "far-left", e.g. anyone who lives in reality.
Turn up the Thorazine drip dosage, Bill.
http://www.netflix.com/Movie/He_Died_with_a_Felafel_in_His_Hand/70002174...
Check it out: Bill O'Reilly Bio-pic "He Died with a Felafel in His Hand".
This story came out the other week. I was wondering if this was the reason for the NIE report to be released.
LONDON, Nov 23 (Reuters) - The U.S. military has stepped up chartering of tankers and requests for extra fuel in the U.S. Central Command area, which includes the Gulf, shipping and oil industry sources say.
A Gulf oil industry source said the charters suggested there would be high naval activity, possibly including a demonstration to Iran that the U.S. Navy will protect the Strait of Hormuz oil shipping route during tensions over Tehran's nuclear programme.
The U.S. Navy's Military Sealift Command (MSC) has tendered for four tankers in November to move at least one million barrels of jet and ship fuel between Gulf ports, from Asia to the Gulf and to the Diego Garcia base, tenders seen by Reuters show.
It usually tenders for one or two tankers a month to supply Gulf operations, which include missions in Iraq.
Back in 1975 the Ford administration was more than willing to sell Iran US nuclear reactors and even allow then to operate a fuel reprocessing plant per "National Security Study Memorandum 219" March 14, 1975.
It is very interesting the cast of characters involved. Rumsfeld Sec. of Defense, Wolfowitz Director Arms control and disarmament agency, Cheney chief of staff, and Kissinger National security council.
I eagerly look forward to the day that the FCC is restored to integrity.
Dennis @ 116:
Ahhhhhh the old 'the New York Times wrote the NIE' ploy.... clever these war profiteers....
"Reality has a well known liberal bias."
-Stephen Colbert
Bah! How Does It Feel To Be A Liar With Your Pants Constantly On Fire?!
Would like to know which subpoenas were issued in an attempt to suppress war crimes evidence; and which allegations relaetd to illegal war crimes planning came to light?
- Which law firms are involved with efforst to suppress this evidence related to war crimes?
- Why are the law firms illegally reporting to the court that open source information the NSA-CIA uses was "illegally" obtained and disclosed?
- Which law firms have bent to client concerns (to suppress war crimes evidence) to support fraud before the court?
Sounds like DoJ OPR needs to look at the law firms assocaited with the White House and find out why the suboenas failed to identify the source of the leaks; and which NSA-CIA officials have been transferring war crimes evidence out of the United States' government control.
There is no statute of limtiations for war crimes. Universal jurisdication. And even lawyers complicit with illegal war crimes policies can be prosecuted.
Now that we know Iran wasn't involved with any "nuclear program" since 203, where/what was DoD targeting in Iran? It looks like the lawyers well know the DoD targeting was not lawful, nor linked with any imminent threat, nor ay bonafide military target threatening the US. That is an alleged war crime, attached to the WH counsel, outside counsel, DoJ Staff counsel, and others in the legal community who provided these frivolous legal arguments supporting these illegal targeting plans within DoD.
Do people still watch this whore?
Dave Flores @ 21:
I feel the same. Disgusting.
Yah, and the word gullible can't be found in the dictionary.
Well holy shit what a black stain on Bush's credibility.
Biden calling him a liar.
Iran's threat should never be made light of, it's serious and dangerous.
i correct myself.. this guy is a neocon..
and saying the president is a liar hurt the country... Well, what if he is a liar? If yuo wanna see a lie.. watch a rerun of the daily show. Or consider his stance on torture... and the action his administration is doing, involving torture. Bill Clinton wasn't a saint, but at least he took his job seriously
The Facta' is Always Right! @ 129:
The only nation that is currently occupying a sovereign nation, who has ever used a nuclear weapon on civilians (or at all for that matter--and used one twice), and is currently killing civilians is the USA. We are a far bigger threat to Iran that they ever will be to any nation.
I bet they both wished that table wasnt in between them. Billo probably wanted to get one of his loofahs out and rub Bolton's balls with it!
pnac @ 119:
I find it disturbing that our country is run by Nixon-era political lifers who try to regurgitate 40 year old policy in the 21st century.
oooooh that oreilly has such a pouty mouth oooooh it says come hither i want a big one inside me ooooooh
Heh heh... #132, that's funny...
Waa, waa, waa, bla, bla, bla... Well, I think the rain in Spain DOESN'T stay mainly on the plain! Nya nya nya! So there!! Who gives a DAMN what you think bolton? Go fu*k yourself! And, REAL objective bill... Why didn't you have someone from the other side of the fence there to debate bolton? Afraid they'd cram it back down your throat and make you look bad? Typical faux BS. No one with any brains watches o'reilly's crap anymore except to laugh at him; I personally laugh at him cuz I think he looks like a gay Mr Potato-head...
[deleted--please consult the commenting policy. Posts made with the intent to insult or incite a flame war are subject to editing/deletion. If you have a point, please try making it civilly. By the way, how does it feel to know you're part of that last, desperately clinging on 24%?]
Liberals concern themselves with the issues that pertain to nothing, while the republicans deal with the real issues. Please for my sake and yours, focus your attention on something that pertains to more worldly affairs.
John Q. Patriot @ 136:
You're a sick, diluted puppy.
[Uh-the term you are looking for is not 'diluted.' The rest of your ill-informed rant is deleted. If you think opposing views aren't allowed here, you obviously aren't familiar at all with this site. Please head back to Free Republic. I'm sure you'll feel much better over there. You're all the same brand of 'smart'-Far Left Wing Sitemonitor]
ted @ 10:
Well, yeah. That much seems obvious. One of them is just an idiot half a world a way who is no credible threat to us. The other is a proven threat to everything that makes this country great, and is right here, in our own country, ostensibly in charge of it. Damn right Bush is the far greater enemy to America.
pinkobait @ 5:
We HAVE to watch this garbage, if only to know what the nut-jobs are doing.
Where do you think that 34-36% of the population gets THEIR "news"? That's
right, 36 PER CENT still think the Manchurian Candidate is a great guy. Now,
we wouldn't be too concerned if, say, 11% felt that way. But 36%? Keepwatching!
What?! Jane Fonda's right, if we hadn't pulled out of Vietnam, those people wouldn't have been killed! Bill O's so crazy.
Damn it, I can't delete that last one, sorry for the double post.
Of course Iran's killing our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan! They definitely have an interest in who wins this war. To quote Dr. Paul, if Russia invaded Mexico, we'd definitely be interested in who won that war, so why are we throwing a fit about this?
Comments are closed on this entry