Mike's Blog Round Up

Good morning. Brad Jacobson of MediaBloodhound here. Today, we’ve got an electric mix of outrage, activism, debate, satire, oratory and, of course, cat juggling. All right, on to the links:

Chris Hedges writes brilliantly on “Why We Resist” (h/t AfterDowningStreet) and here's how you can resist Congressional Democratic support for $70 billion more in Iraq.

 

Larisa Alexandrovna covers two stories about the evil that men do (one involving U.S. interrogators, the other Halliburton).

Some progressives (h/t Digby) argue holding Pelosi, Rockefeller and Harman responsible for their silence on torture will torpedo investigations of the destroyed CIA tapes. Glenn Greenwald is unconvinced, as is Digby. And Lindsay Beyerstein finds holes in Pelosi’s defense. What do you think?

Top Ten Bushisms of 2007! (h/t The Blog Report.)

Lee Stranahan presents Mike Huckabee's latest TV ad.

Al Gore’s Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech: “It is time to make peace with the planet.” (Also, don’t miss CNN’s John Roberts bring up the “fair and balanced” Global Warming Hypocrite meme seconds later.)

I’m out. See ya tomorrow! Send post suggestions to mediabloodhound (at) yahoo (dot) com.


Advertise Here

Login or Register to post comments.

26 comments

Preventing "First!" since 2007.

The new movie The Golden Compass has a baddie played by Nicole Kidman who is blond, who is evil, and who's last name is Coulter.

Hollywood is so unbelievable.

No... not cat juggling! Something must be done for those poor kittens!

Excellent, thoughtful essay by Chris Hedges regarding the issue of civil disobedience as it relates to war. It puts into perspective the relatively little abuse that I have gone through because of my anti-war shirts and bumper stickers as compared to what the giants of dissent have endured, such as Henry Thoreau, Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, et al. For too many people, the occupation of Iraq has simply been an abstraction to them. It is long past the point that the majority of people in this country awaken to the fact that they, like those during the Vietnam War, have the power to bring this illegal occupation to an end.

... holding Pelosi, Rockefeller and Harman responsible for their silence on torture will torpedo investigations of the destroyed CIA tapes.

It will only stop the investigations if they are spineless, venal idiots. If they don't do something grand and principled now, it will end their careers. They were complicit before--they better get on the ball and be the great leaders they need to be now.

Um, what's going on with the font for the roundup the past couple of days? It's tiny and hard on the ole eyes over here.

That Mike Huckabee ad was funny. Oddly enough I have some ideas that may work for Huckabee's base though. Shots of Huckabee shaking hands with various religious leaders and making religiously based slogans to the public. There could also be shots of Mike rounding up those evildoers and/or other "undesirables" such as homosexuals, hispanics, people with AIDS among others and shipping them off to some undisclosed location. That would really make his base happy!

On second thought, scratch that idea. Hitler already used those ideas during his reign in Nazi Germany.

IgnoranceIsNotBliss, I just sent Nicole an email about that. Not sure why that's happening. Hopefully it can be adjusted to avoid further eye strain.

Just thought I'd share this pretty amazing video segment from this morning. A former CIA Interrogator spills the beans and claims that the orders to torture detainees came from the White House rather than just happening "willy nilly". Its worth discussion and hopefully these comments will gain some traction in the MSM.

Former CIA Interrogator John Kiriakou – We Tortured Because White House Told Us To

http://test.redlasso.com/service/svc/clip/playClip?fid=67347de8-0e38-46b...

Whenever anyone from the Bush Administration says anything, regardless of whether they have the evidence to back it up, they can take comfort knowing that their trusted lapdogs in the U.S. media will report it as the whole, unadulterated truth.

U.S. Media Says Torture is OK

9 Paul D

The trouble is former spook John Kiriakou claimed that torture was effective, and he's lending support that they've stopped numberless terrorist attacks in this manner, the WH line.

Odds were the tortured would say anything to end the torture, including making things up, and when the made up things didn't happen because they were made up, any mobilization was deemed effective.

toroture?

Must be when the matador kills the bull.

Great roundup (especially for me, since I've been out of town).

Timely quote via jr from the comments section of at-Largely:

The civilized have created the wretched, quite coldly and deliberately, and do not intend to change the status quo; are responsible for their slaughter and enslavement; rain down bombs on defenseless children whenever and wherever they decide that their 'vital interests' are menaced, and think nothing of torturing a man to death: these people are not to be taken seriously when they speak of the 'sanctity' of human life, or the 'conscience' of the civilized world.

-- James Baldwin [From chapter one of "The Devil Finds Work" (orig. pub. 1976), page 489 of Collected Essays (1998)]

Brad J. @ 8:

IgnoranceIsNotBliss, I just sent Nicole an email about that. Not sure why that's happening. Hopefully it can be adjusted to avoid further eye strain.

Thank you. Thank you.

You're quite welcome.

great mix of stories by Brad

Thanks for your kind words, Batocchio, and welcome back. Glad I could catch you up, specifically on the cat juggling - the MSM has been mum on this for far too long.

An additional topic: On NPR's Talk of the Nation's first segment, Wait Wait, Don't Tell Me host Peter Sagel took issue with left wing blogs to task about piling on Dana Perino's admission that she didn't know the difference between the Bay of Pigs and Cuban Missile crisis. Amusing as ever, I have to say his point was well made as I kind of thought the same thing after I listened to the segment here. While a valid complaint it was overblown and, moreover, is an attitude that doesn't contribute towards dialog between left and right if we are always going to play "Gotcha" every time someone makes an small error, leading to Mutual Assured Disagreement between both sides.

Who likes a nag?

"(Also, don’t miss CNN’s John Roberts bring up the “fair and balanced” Global Warming Hypocrite meme seconds later.)"

That clip linked to that was posted on Al Gore's site didn't mention what John Roberts said after the speech. Anyone care to clue me in?

Thx

ysbaddaden @ 11:

9 Paul D

The trouble is former spook John Kiriakou claimed that torture was effective, and he's lending support that they've stopped numberless terrorist attacks in this manner, the WH line.

Odds were the tortured would say anything to end the torture, including making things up, and when the made up things didn't happen because they were made up, any mobilization was deemed effective.

I understand the nuance of his perspective. His personal interpretation of torture and its appropriate uses are irrelevant, however. What is relevant is that he is freely admitting that the policy decision was passed down from the White House.

danL, your confusion makes sense. Gore (or the person running his website) has since snipped the video on his site to cut out CNN's subsequent idiotic ramblings. I'm actually surprised Gore or his peeps didn't think of that in the first place. It's a little like ending your wedding tape with a comment from a disgruntled ex.

jr, thanks. Appreciate it. And thanks for reading.

Noodles @ 19:

An additional topic: On NPR's Talk of the Nation's first segment, Wait Wait, Don't Tell Me host Peter Sagel took issue with left wing blogs to task about piling on Dana Perino's admission that she didn't know the difference between the Bay of Pigs and Cuban Missile crisis. Amusing as ever, I have to say his point was well made as I kind of thought the same thing after I listened to the segment here. While a valid complaint it was overblown and, moreover, is an attitude that doesn't contribute towards dialog between left and right if we are always going to play "Gotcha" every time someone makes an small error, leading to Mutual Assured Disagreement between both sides.

Who likes a nag?

"...small error..."? It is not simply the fact that Dana Perino did not realize that the Cuban Missile Crisis was one of the seismic events of the twentieth century. It is not only the fact that this happened in her capacity of working for the United States government. Even more egregiously is that she never expressed any remorse or sorrow or contrition or shame for not having been aware that the United States and Russia almost went to war over missiles being stored in Cuba in the early 1960s. I listened to the interview also and it seemed to me that she treated it as a joke, perhaps thinking that if she makes light of the matter then no one will hold her accountable for her faux pas.

What you are saying seems to be simply symptomatic of today's society. Those who have allegedly attended school, much less a school of higher education like Ms. Perino, apparently, according to you, should not be expected to remember one of the most significant occurrences in U.S. history. To Ms. Perino her ignorance was not a big deal, perhaps thinking that people will overlook her error because what she lacks in intelligence she is able to compensate with her looks. Another example of style triumphing over substance in today's United States.

Erroll,

I was hoping to find the segment of Talk of the Nation that Sagel was on today but it appears they didn't put it up. In a nutshell he said that they have their guests on their comedy game show and the guests try to be entertaining and self-depreciating. This is particularly true as the segment tries to stump them about stuff that they wouldn't be expected to know about. Perino spoke about the Cuban screw up herself pointing out that it was something that she should have known and looked foolish about for not knowing.

Sagel's point was that while it might be appropriate to jump all over her about it the day she made the comment at the press conference, this was a situation where levity was involved on a quiz show. And he thought it showed the lack of a sense of humor on the part of people to get bent out of shape about it in that context and her own admission of it. Which was my take on it a couple of days ago, kind of like shooting fish in a barrel I guess. And while yes, she should know that stuff it makes us look quite petty, when you step back, to see the blogs piling on over this occurrence on a freakin' game show where she's trying to be a good sport, probably in front of a mostly liberal audience judging by the lackluster applause.

Now, perhaps you know every possible thing that you might be expected to know about your job and have never screwed up at it. I can't make that claim. I'm not giving her a pass, but is this really worth a ton of bandwidth if she missed something that happened when she was a kid? When it's an obvious point about Iraq or the sub prime debacle or such, that's pretty critical and should rightfully be flagged. But this...?

Anyhow, Sagel's comment on the entire affair was that in his opinion, "it would be better if mockery were left to the professionals." Maybe he has a point. I laughed anyway.

#24-Noodles

"I'm not giving her a pass..." Actually, it does sound like you are giving her a pass. My point still stands. She and you want people to have pity on her for not knowing what should have been a basic point of knowledge regarding U.S./world history. You seem astounded that Perino is being criticized for "having missed something when she was a kid." You somehow want to believe that Perino's ignorance is to be seen as a reason for humor if not a source of pride while I and others see it as symptomatic of society reveling in their lack of basic world affairs. Yet you are not bothered in the least that she, as a government employee and a spokesperson for the White House no less, was not aware of one of the most important historical events of the twentieth century. To you, this is something to be laughed at while those in countries which value education and knowledge shake their collective heads at the continued stupidity that Americans seem to take so much pride in.

If she had not been aware of how many children Franklin Roosevelt had or if John F. Kennedy had any pets, then your point would have been valid. One wonders if this mental giant is cognizant of what act caused the U.S. to enter on the side of the allies during World War II. Perhaps she should ask her husband what country attacked the U.S. and if she recognizes the date of Dec. 7, 1941. One wonders if she stayed awake in school to learn how President Kennedy died. Perhaps this tower of intellect believes that John F. Kennedy is alive and well and living at Martha's Vineyard.

She has no excuse and she deserves all the criticism that someone in her position has received for not knowing, and seemingly not caring, about one of the major historical events to have occurred in this country and in the world. All the rationalizing that you wish to engage in does not obscure the fact of how profound her ignorance truly is, which apparently is quite deep.

26 comments

Login or Register to post comments.