Limbaugh: It's gotta be those out of state buses
By John Amato Wednesday Jan 09, 2008 11:01am
After predicting Hillary would lose, (yesterday) Rush Limbaugh took a caller and let him explain the "out-of-town buses" routine as yet another voter fraud type theory in NH that swung the election for Hillary. The caller believes it, because he never "saw" so many people in his small town in NH before.
C&Ler Brendan's email explains:
Rush was, of course, among those predicting a Hillary loss (on Monday's show he was saying that Clinton staffers were sending out their resumes...with no real evidence)... Today, (minutes ago) he's got callers saying that there were ineligible (out of state) voters at polling places. He says that this is "anecdotal" evidence but he still puts them on.
I'm sorry, but listening to Rush talk about voter fraud is hazardous to your health. And I still can't get over the fight between RushBo and Huckabee when most of his listeners are Evangelicals...Limbaugh really went after him over and over and over again. Jane writes: "Huckabee Pwns Limbaugh"
Login or Register to post comments.
Flush Limbaugh.
Gawd I hate seeing that jerk-hoff at the top of Crooks and Liars, sucking on that stogie as if it is something else. the man is telling crapola whatever he says.
Toooo funny: http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2008/1/9/16147/71670
Considering how much he lies to voters about political issues, Rush himself constitutes voter fraud.
This man is not worth having a conversation about. With all that is going on why even waste the space on this idiot. C&L - you should be ashamed.
they didn't need buses when Diebold did the job just fine
I still don't see the attraction to Rush Limbaugh. I mean, its like listening to Joseph Goebbels. I guess some people just like being lied to.
It’s only my opinion but some time I wonder that all those Buses came from the EIB communications network, from those European investors, through those front companies the Arabs keep his Excellency, Limbaugh supplied in cash. Haven't had enough time to dig in this part of rush Limbaugh finacing but it is curious and dubious.
If one starts to take a good look at Obama many Americans can see how this guy is in a manipulated tide of affection, praise, admiration, and fundamentally a whole bunch of power steering. Here, America hopes Obama is driving in a well designed Corvette out of American automakers, not some new fangled Chinese hybrid Americans are forced to buy from a Wal-Mart show room because the economy tracks for the powerful few.
Just getting through the prologue in Obama's book " Audacity of Hope", rereading some very catching statements Obama makes that encourage me, yet suddenly brings me to caution.
It’s to know that from the get go Obama is very concerned about the impact of his name in politics. I’m glad and impressed by this admission. Sitting with a friend and adviser in a restaurant his friend said “You can’t change your name, of course, Voters are suspicious of that kind of thing”. As they look over and talked about the headlines of Osama Bin Laden.
It is definitely not just experience but maturity that links me to caution. Here, the basics with American success in working through this experiment of our current formula of Democracy are so important and so distorted by Mainstream Media, I feel afraid. That so called powerful endorsement by Oprah and failed win of Obama in New Hampshire signals a time for reflection to play fair follow the money plus following the deeds. The Media hates Hillary so much they wish to jump through the logic of debates and go directly to a Republican vs. Democratic play off. To me and perhaps a great deal of others, ideals in laws, believes in the Constitution, philosophies in social structure, Public housing, affirmative action, the list goes on but the Media avoids much because of previous Republican controlled Congress abuse of power and deliberate secrecy America is dealing with now.
My caution with support to Obama starts immediately in the prologue when Obama states “ Most of us are wise to the ways of admen, pollsters, speechwriters, and pundits.” To me Obama completely dismisses the huge wave of hate black rape music industry that in it self is the economics of party time, big money, an economy based black drug society bridging the whites, sex, homicide, theft, social friction to the decadence in factories of jail time training. To me here, Obama just thinks about the power steering to a good life, and totally avoid conversations about the power brakes needed.
That simple low keyed conversation Hillary is accused in acting, staged, using sexism, weeping, crying, pouting, showing emotion, like candidates are not supposed to, show me a new side of Hillary, and a new support for her as the right choice to lead. Just by saying “She, Hillary, see’s where America is going and it must be reversed”. I totally agree, Hillary understands the power brakes are broken, or just a plain poor design.
Joe O. @ 7:
If you're an idiot, Rush makes you feel smart by pandering to all your idiot ideas and fears.
Bluesage @ 5:
therefore you should be ashamed of wasting your precious time reading and then posting
run back quick to redstate you fucking wingnut troll
fuck el druggo and every wingnut in this country
Next he'll be saying that the out-of-towners thought they were going to get a great deal on prescriptions.
Travis @ 6:
Wrong. They use paper ballots in NH. Maybe Hillary had a superior GOTV ground operation? You know, the Clintons have run for office before ;-)
That Rush went after F*ckerbee won't matter at all to the evangelicals who listen to him, they don't have critical thought skills as is.
Rush is such an a**.
We need to keep posting that admission he made last year about being water boy for the party everywhere and anywhere there are Rush bots lurking. Just as a reminder.
These rumors of voter fraud are all behind the move to have people show identification before they vote. Identification can be faked. Are the people at the polls who have to look at the identification going to know enough about whether an ID is fake? Probably not. Then what's the point. The need for identification will just make it impossible for people who don't drive or have a passport to vote. That might be a big chunk of people in NYC.
Hey, that would be a great full time job for Limbaugh.
Finally, he's found his calling.
And finally, for a change, he can talk about something he's an expert on.
Let him be the full time, exclusive, predictor of
LOSERS
Here the Republicans are bringing up voter fraud as a reason for Hillary to win -- when the real voter fraud is the electonic voting machines.
Rush Limbaugh. Rush Limbaugh? Rush? You talkin about the same Rush that travels to Haiti for a week of child sex? That Rush Limbaugh? He ain't in jail yet?
As someone who is going to be clerking our primary and has clerked before I can assure these bozos that the notion that there could be mass voter fraud is absurd, simply absurd. People are down on the voter rolls by *street address* and *street addresses* especially in small towns/non urban areas are largely fixed. You can't easily *add* someone to the rolls because you would have to either remove an already existing voter or put them into an already existing *address*. New voters in my state have to show ID to prove they are resident even after they have gone to the trouble of proving their residence in order to register in the first place (new law). It simply can't happen that in a small town or rural ward that people can wander in and vote at will. It. Can't. Happen.
aimai
RagingGurrl @ 12:
Wrong, 80% of the precincts are Diebold.
I for one do not want to know where Limbaugh's cigar has been.
How come, every time they use that same photo of Limbaugh, they photoshop it.
Taking out the hair, and the testicles, and pasting in the ash?
I'm hoping that the stogie in his trap was once Bill Clinton's, and that it had been used.
Wonder what Limbotomy would say about the economy, but on the other hand, I don't give a shit what he say's.
Hillary benefited from MACHINE COUNTED votes vs HAND COUNTED.
http://ronrox.com/paulstats.php?party=DEMOCRATS
If you look at the stats you can see how much Hillary benefited from Machine counted votes and how much Obama didn't. Obama leads in the hand counted votes.
The thing with voter fraud is that when it gets a Republican the win, the Republican voters don't care, only the democrats do. When it gets a democrat the win, the democrat voters don't care only the republicans do.
I have said since before Hillary announced her running that the same people that stole the election for Bush are going to steal it for her.
The millions of Americans who listen & worship
Limbaugh will never change. He can insult them,
lie to them say his usual crazy line every day
it doesn't matter. We are Americans. If it's bullshit
we believe it. If it's true we dismiss it. That's why
we elected Bush & hate Hillary. We Americans really
suck. Exceptions exist but are rare.
Sounds like Rush and O'Reilly have a little rift going. O'Reilly mentioned on his radio show that prior to the New Hampshire primary Rush called in to the bigwigs at Fox complaining that they weren't making a big enough deal out of Hillary Clintons' meltdown. Now why would O'Reilly even bother mentioning that on the air? He never says anything bad about fellow conservatives unless there is some personal anymosity between them. I wonder what Rush did to piss off Loofah boy.
I think based on the results of 2000, we can all look forward to cries of voter fraud from now on no matter who wins, nor how they win. The difference I think is the Dems will only look into it IF there seems to be some substance. Whereas the Repubs will be screaming it like a pack of vicious dogs and never let up.
appnzllr @ 14:
Voter ID also makes it harder for women who are married. If you are registered under your maiden name, you could be purged from the polls - so please, if you are a woman check to be sure you're registered!! Keep your records up to date - Find out if you're registered to vote here: https://votepoke.org/
From Daily Kos:
Bluesage @ 5:
I know most of us are tired of seeing the same parade, but, ultimately, exposing these boils on America's backside is important.
The trick is how to fight them without becoming just like them.
i am SOOOOO tired of seeing Rush and O'Reilly on this site.
We get it. They're douchebags. who cares. cover something else already.
Ron @ 19:
Nope - there are NO touchscreen voting machines used in NH. They use paper ballots. In some counties these paper ballots are optically scanned by Diebold machines. There is a paper trail and no other nominee has contested the results.
Change that to - no other "candidate" - can't rush this nomination process!
Filthy Harry @ 26:
It's not voter fraud that we are concerned about. It's election fraud that the repugs have carried out in the past several elections that we should be concerned with.
Bill Hicks had a pretty high opinion of Rush:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg2_MntkMzg
Funny how yesterday in the US Supreme Court there were oral arguments about voter fraud and voter ID requirements and both lawyers stated that there is not evidence of voter fraud in that case. I suspect that there is no evidence of any voter fraud in NH either, however as Stephen Colbert noted, reality has a well known liberal bias....
Ron @ 19:
Point? Hillary led NH in all of 2007; Obama got a bump from Iowa, but that does not erase a full year of support...
The outcome is what would be expected...not every poll had him ahead...
This is a joke, and manufactured by the media.
If Obama had been leading NH for a few months, then sure, it seems suspect...but when everything is looked at, Hillary won by a smaller margin than what she would have won by if Obama had not won Iowa....but she still would have won, period.
How the hell would anyone know if someone is from out of state or not, just by looking at them? Absurd on its face.
RagingGurrl @ 30:
The diebold machine counts the paper ballots that are fed through it in 80% of the precincts. Google it. The machines can be hacked in less than 10 minutes.
Yes Rush, it's the "Out of Towners" sneaking in to cast illegal ballots, Not an army of outraged citizens who have had enough of the bush policies, his private war in Iraq, his plummeting economy. Not the hatred for bush and the NeoCon/PNAC'rs who have ruined America and made us a laughing stock around the world, who took us from World Leaders to failed Imperialists in just seven years.
Yep, damn those bus's.
Why the Fuck do I care about anything Rush has to say???
Bottom line. Polls and surveys are science, based on mathematics. Always were, always will, because they work. Science and mathematics got us to the Moon and Mars. Keith suggested that before every Primary now we should focus on psychoanalysis of the candidates, not on the polls. The media seem to follow this logic and psychology is now to be in fact the primary argument among the pundits as we move forward.
Geezeus Christ.
I hope anyone can spot a fraud when one sees one (I'm sorry, I should say, if one senses that his psyche may have some internal conflicts one's not aware of and what one sees in reality and acts upon it may not be real after all, black may be white, man may be woman, and the Obamas, for argument's sake, may be the Clintons)
Northern California Dave @ 39:
When I was in the Navy there was a southern boy in my division who use to say, every time he saw a fat guy with a cigar " It's gonna rain for sure ... There goes a hog with a stick in his mouth !"
yenehC hcaepmI @ 23:
This doesn't prove anything; 1)What are the districts' who had hand counted votes political leanings? 2)Hand counts (i.e., human beings counting hundreds of ballots) are not infallible 3)This is misleading because at first glance people assume votes were BOTH machine votes, AND hand counted in the same districts.
This doesn't prove anything....And shame on you for posting a Ron Paul link.
Listening to Limbaugh lowers your IQ. It's true! I heard it on Air America. ;-)
Could somebody please explain what the semi-literate "pwns" means? Is that supposed to be "owns," and somebody is too damn stupid or careless or caught up in clever insider Internet lingo to render it correctly?
What a fat, sloppy, doughy, self loathing sack of crap Limbaugh is. Having got that out of my system, please stop showing him and Billo so close to lunch time.
Just to bring you up to date on the Diebold machines in NH.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiiaBqwqkXs
Ron @ 37:
Again - they use PAPER ballots. NO touchscreens. You forgot that Diebold touchscreen machines were the issue. Hacking is an issue ONLY if there is no paper trail - Look it up. And NO nominee has contested the results - Google that.
aimai @ 18:
Bravo!! At last, this is a comment worth reading. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
D.G. Bowman @ 44:
Yes, it's gamer language for "owns." The mispelling is intentional, and meant to convey that they are too busy whipping your ass to care about spelling, grammar, or punctuation.
RagingGurrl @ 47:
Don't take my word for it. Refer to the link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiiaBqwqkXs
please, i beg you, stop using that photo. I hate it. I hate his face. i hate that he is mocking, us, the viewer in it.
DaveM @ 51:
It's Titled "PIG CHEWING STICK"
Ron @ 50:
Again - There is a paper trail. Hack away Diebold - we can still check the votes. Get it?
Nothing better than a reich-wing conspiracy.
Flush Rush
RagingGurrl @ 53:
Can, but will they. Get it?
Acting Patriotic @ 3:
HALARIOUS!!
Hate the use of fake callers on these right wing shows! Just gives these professional lying watercarriers (Can't see Rush going around singing Age of Aquarius, can you?) a chance to spout out about some cockamamie theory they made up while coming down off of sudafed and vienna sausages!
Jeebus will the lunatics saying that "the same people" who stole the election for bush will steal it for clinton *get a fucking grip?* The *republicans* stole the election, where they stole it, for their candidate. Regardless of the bizarro world anti hillary talk Hillary Clinton is *not a republican candidate* and Diebold, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the GOP, knows that *even if you maroons do not.* And if she were capable of stealing the fucking election she'd have stolen herself a landslide, ok? Three points when she was up twenty for a solid year is *not* a landslide.
aimai
GREG @ 57:
Now THAT is a Very Funny Video....
Thanks for posting that, it made my day.
Ron @ 56:
Interesting how Edwards, Obama and Richards don't seem to have a problem with the count, yet you do. Get over it.
On this "fraud" issue, there is no fire, just a lot of smoke and Hot Air.
RagingGurrl @ 61:
"Richardson"
LIMBAUGH would know all about voter fixing.
The past 8 nightmare years in 180 seconds.
"Fighting terrorism by creating it".
Sweet.
It's 2007 and Limbaugh is still against busing.
RagingGurrl @ 61:
Fact, I never said I had a problem with the count. I only brought up the fact that they used
Diebold machines in 80% of the precincts in NH.
The commenters at "http://www.politico.com" are scary! None of the Republican candidates are conservative enough for them?!? Who the hell do they want? Mussolini?
I laugh every time I see that pic of stupid.
He looks every bit the fat evil cigar chomping Capitalist that just kicked a poor family out on the street at on Christmas day.He's a cartoon character.
What is this? Some kind of pot/kettle moment? Limbaugh talking about fraud... Any kind of fraud... What a joke, given his track record.. He's the biggest fraud with a mic on the planet... Shutup fatboy... Go somewhere you hog and suck on your stick!!! JD
Thanks, Stinky.
It still looks sloppy, illiterate and puerile. As a writer and editor, I care about ... you guessed it: grammar, spelling and punctuation.
So ... bad Jane! Use another verb, please! Realize that your audience is made up of more than just "gamers"!
Why doesn't someone follow this guy (ala O'Rielly's producer) when he goes to Hati or Dominican Republic to get his child sex?
Well . . the stupid will always listen to Pills, Insanity, etc. America is one "dumb as hell" nation.
As for Huckabee, they are terrified of him because, unlike most of them, he is REALLY an evangelical. He doesn't pay lip service to it like so many Repugs. (I don't think this is laudable, merely true). And, because of that, he can't be controlled by the Repugs and the Corporations and they are TERRIFIED of that. THey are losing control fast and they are scared. You think they lie and cheat now?? Just wait til we get closer to Nov and they see their power going down the toilet.
Comedian must have took some time off, his idiocy is usually shown every other day.
the pig man might be right on this one
Scy @ 72:
Flush Rush and plunge. It is going to take some doing.
If I was a Republican fixer what would I do?
With the economy teetering on collapse, Iraq in flames and Bush's polls the lowest of any sitting President--- I would pick a second best candidate, preferably one that has been bought by Goldman/Sachs, Defense Contractors, Insurance companies etc.
Then I would hack the easily hackable machines.
Then I would send out Rush to talk about vote fraud, so that anyone asking legitimate questions would be smeared with the stench of fat boy.
Ron @ 66:
Fewer than half the towns in New Hampshire tabulate votes with optical scanners.
Joze @7 - uh.....what? Where did that come from?
Anyway, I hate that fat turd Limbaugh. I don't understand why anyone would pay attention to him. Not going to college doesn't make you a stupid person, just like going to college doesn't make you a genius - but if you dropped out of college in your first year don't sit there and try to teach me about economics/politics/sociology/climatology (although I'm sure he could teach a few people about pharmacology). Thats one thing i've never understood about his insistence that global warming is a "hoax" and his vendetta against Al Gore - Gore put climate scientists in a movie about climate change, Limbaugh insists that Gore is an idiot for pushing global warming and "backs up" his claim using anecdotal evidence from conservative tinged non-scientific sources. No big deal, except for all the people who believe him.
My dad asked me once why if I hate Limbaugh so much, why do I listen to him and repeat some of the crappy things he says. "Because someday I'm hoping I can repeat when he says "I am dying of brain cancer and it is incredibly painful."
That'd be crude if I wasn't talking about a guy who makes fun of Parkinsons.
RagingGurrl @ 77:
I don't get your point. The larger towns have more precincts and they have optical scanners (Diebold).
yenehC hcaepmI @ 23:
I genuinely hope both Democrats and Republicans team up to nab the folks who are apparently stealing our elections. I've already sent the FBI a memo encouraging a full investigation of New Hampshire, as well as an increased FBI presence at future primaries, and I hope others will do as I did. I'm sure there's no shortage of G-Men who'd love to nab the Clinton team stealing an election.
No more Clintons, no more Bushes. It's a corporate dog and pony show, folks. And it looks like both are involved in malfeascence.
We can't let up on voter fraud issues, like Gore and Kerry did. Don't be fooled by the shell game.
And remember, it's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
That is, unless you're Monica Lewinsky, in which case you'll probably get a pretty lucrative book deal.
Rush is the Moses of Scaifetards
Ron @ 79:
In more than half of the towns in New Hampshire, the paper ballots are counted by hand. Your figure: "80% of the precincts are Diebold." Didn't make a difference in the vote count.
I love that picture - it's so remarkably phallic.
*
RagingGurrl @ 77:
"More than half" is a slight understatement, assuming the data on the Ron Paul site are correct. They have the numbers as 228,307 using optical and 59,157 using hand-counting. I, personally, use something a bit more precise than "more than half" when dealing with a ratio around 3.85 to 1.
Or do you dispute the numbers quoted on the Ron Paul site?
If anyone should know about voter fraud it's a Republican. From the Supreme Court, to the Florida recount, to Kathelene Harris, to Diebold, to long lines and minority precincts, to minority disenfranchising to voter roll purging these crooks wrote the book on voter fraud, election tampering and democracy undermining.
Hello pot? This is kettle.
I agree that "80% of the precincts are Diebold" is an overstatement. The correct statement is that around 80% of the votes were counted by a Diebold machine.
For now, I, personally, just want data. It's a snap to check for a significant shift in percents as a function of counting method, controlling for town size. What's needed are more covariates. Most of all, I'd want the median income for each of the precincts, since this is what I predict will explain the apparent shift as a function of counting method.
To be clear: I predict that wealthier precincts are more likely to have scanners. That wealthier people went for Clinton and Romney would not surprise me one bit.
RagingGurrl @ 82:
The smaller towns have hand counted ballots. It's more than likely they only have 1 precinct. The larger cities may have 100s of precincts that have optical scanners(Diebold). What is it you don't understand?
Just a thought:
7 Point Swing for Clinton Over Obama in NH's Diebold Precincts
Analaysis Shows Candidates 'Positions Swapped' Where Ballots Counted by Hand Versus 'Counted' by Machine... http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5540
jr @ 81:
What is it with Rush and Dicks? He invites the VP Dick to his show.
FLASHBACK...
Grand Theft America: http://www.ericblumrich.com/gta.html
Look at how brainwashed liberals have become.
We have insecure machines in the voting booths and those who bring it up are shouted down.
CIA-DailyKos says, "Nothing to see here! Move along. Shut up!!!!"
If we can't get excited about the right to vote that our founding fathers died for, then maybe we should just watch Brittney do her thing and shut up like they want us to.
There's a middle ground, neoconned. There are people who find the data to be interesting and worth looking into. My thoughts: on one hand, if something's up, better to know now; on the other hand, if nothing is going on, then better to stay quiet, because a false-alarm now could trigger a "cry wolf" defense when something really is fishy (as in Ohio last time).
So, I reject both the "shut up!" and "OMG! they stole another election!" positions.
For those who hate Hillary, for all those who say she is destroying fair practices...I have a news flash for you people!!! You know what?????
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
You aren't hateful ENOUGH!!
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2008/01/sexist-jamokes-disrupt-hilla...
SHe AGAIN plants campaign operatives in her audiences...
The dude had a friggin Hillary for President sticker....hmmmm....
JTM @ 92:
The middle ground is pretty messy. Hillary supporters have no problems with fraud, or with Constitutional spitting at, because it SUITS THEIR WANTS. If the Diebold machines are fraudulent, and if they're fraudulent in FAVOR of Hillary, then of course liberals will scream that it is "those evil neo-cons" who are trying to downplay a legitimate candidate.
JTM
I respect your opinion BUT the time to be measured has long since passed. If the suspicions of vote fraud destroy the legitimacy of the election than it doesn't matter if they are true-- the machines have hurt our democracy and should be taken out of the booths. All Americans need to unite against this abomination.
If Samuel Adams were alive today, he would get his Harvard boys together with baseball bats and start smashing these machines.
D.G. Bowman @ 44:
Hope this helps:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pwned
"Having another Clinton back in power would make him the Leading Voice of the Opposition once again."
No way! A fat white guy bashing Clinton on AM Radio is soooooo '80's. The Right Wing Noise Machine has devolved since then. The superstars are the RW skanks like Michele Malkin and Ann Coulter.
Rush was popular in his day, but the powers that be thought that a prettier face would sell the message. That's when Oliver North got his show. From there, they went to Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter, and Michele Malkin- each better looking than the other, but not quite ready for daylight. They hope to eventually get up to pretty.
neoconned @ 95:
OK, but here's a piece of advice. If you're going to make a stink, be precise and be accurate. For example, when talking about NH, don't say things like "taken out of the booth," since the devices in question are not in the booths. The issue in NH is optical scanning, which is a method of counting; NH doesn't have touch-screen voting.
JTM,
You win the rhetorical point about New Hampshire but I am talking about all the machines in all of the states- those that count the votes and those that record them directly. How long are you going to wait to make a stink? If we have the same phenomenon occurring in South Carolina and Michigan but not in the caucus- run Nevada will you still be fighting the good fight for sensibility and making rhetorical points? This is not a rhetorical question. Where do you draw the line?
Reichwingers like rash limpballs make no sense at all. Sometimes it seems like they're hoping Hillary will win, because they pretend to think any publican can beat her, and then when she wins a primary it's only because of out of state people coming to vote (voter fraud).
Only time I remember that happening was when out of state party workers were bussed in Florida in 2000 for "spontaneous" demonstrations.
I feel so sorry for that newswoman who banged this nasty tub of shit. She must wake up in the middle of the night screaming, sweating, and crying. I'll bet she still gets laughed at at parties and family reunions for doing Rush. No amount of money she stole out of this fat fuck's wallet while he was sleeping could ever justify fucking him.
RagingGurrl @ 12:
Paper ballots, less than 10% was paper ballots. Majority was diebold.
Left&Left @ 101:
Don't feel too sorry. According to Sean Hannity, 'You ain't been eaten until you've been eaten by Rush'. Maybe that's true for women, too.
Do we have to be subjected to that face? Even if I don't read the article about him, I'm still forced to view that face.
Busses full of republican voters from out of state. No wonder Mccain got so many votes!
Rush, O'Falafel, Nut Coulter: who cares what those morons say?
Concerning Rush's picture. I think Freud was wrong. Sometimes a cigar isn't just a cigar.
his show is (believe it or not) shameless lately
#2
sucking on that stogie
I'd love to punch it down his throat!
Login or Register to post comments.