Go Home

Mid Day Open Thread

from Bizarro.comfrom Bizarro.com h/t FranIam.

Open Thread below....

About Bluegal aka Fran
Bluegal aka Fran's picture
Executive Producer of The Professional Left Podcast. On staff at Crooks and Liars since 2007. Master's degree from Harvard. Happy wife of Driftglass. Mother of three geniuses. Obsessive knitter. Blogs at http://bgalrstate.blogspot.com. .
Share This Post

Link To This Post


104 Comments
Bit NOLA's picture

Where's Frist?

jr's picture

young earthers get the bozack

Bit NOLA's picture

More importantly, where's Fitz?

Tim in Japan's picture

sean hannity is second from the left.

Bit NOLA's picture

Speaking of intellectual dishonesty wearing robes and bleating like a sheep, here's a link to a pissed-off Brit on Pat Robertson's case. Robertson told us that God told him there would be a major attack in America in 2007.

So who lied? God?

<ahref="http://www.url.com/"http://onegoodmovemedia.org/movies/0801/pat.mov

L.A. Confidential's picture

I think Obama really needs to consider giving pink slips to his campaign strategists.

The base they are cultivating for him are getting to pushy, reactive, and nasty.

Bit NOLA's picture

Ah well, go here and scroll down if interested:

corrected link here

Bit NOLA's picture

Or just forget all about it. I give up.

fixed it Bit NOLA - Sitemonitor

As I said last week, wishing for a long contentious primary season, I not only want my candidates to believe in evolution, I want them to practice it.

curt's picture

I'd rather be created by a loving God than accidentally evolved from basic matter. If I were actually a result of the natural process of evolution (with no input or care from a higher power - i.e. a higher power doesn't even exist), then my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook! I prefer to believe that life (and personal consciousness) is eternal and that the force behind it all is God. I've had enough of "eat drink and be merry" only to find it empty and hollow in the end. The strongest connections I've had with other people and with God have been through spiritual experiences brought on through faith, fellowship, prayer, and selflessness.

Brad's picture

http://www.neilfreer.com/
creation by transcultural "gods"

General_Rennenkampf's picture

Tim in Japan @ 4:

sean hannity is second from the left.

That's an insult to the Neanderthals.

For all the people who point out that MLK was a preacher, let me remind you what Pastor Jerry said when MLK was using the same Bible for Civil Rights: "MLK is a tool of the Devil." Christianity has such a confused textbook that people can point to the same set of verses and then say two different things. The fact that this "One True Faith" has thousands of sects and that the only way you can know a sect is correct is if you belong to it, and that these sects can't even agree on whether their Divine Rabbi on a Stick was God or not, much less whether or not he would or wouldn't approve of Pastor Hinn's new Lexus, would seem to indicate that mabye, just mabye the logical people atheists have a point. It's pathetic beyond words how a religion founded from a Jewish Rabbi with twelve male disciples alone in the desert could become the anti-Semitic, homophobic death-worshiping monstrosity it is today.

Brad's picture

If we were engineered to be slaves for workship (archaic spelling,) that would help explain the tendency to look to others for guidance, rather than to suffer pain from effort-driven context-building.

dandy's picture

curt @ 10:

I'd rather be created by a loving God than accidentally evolved from basic matter. If I were actually a result of the natural process of evolution (with no input or care from a higher power - i.e. a higher power doesn't even exist), then my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook! I prefer to believe that life (and personal consciousness) is eternal and that the force behind it all is God. I've had enough of "eat drink and be merry" only to find it empty and hollow in the end. The strongest connections I've had with other people and with God have been through spiritual experiences brought on through faith, fellowship, prayer, and selflessness.

Amen, curt!

Jo's picture

curt @ 10:

I'd rather be created by a loving God than accidentally evolved from basic matter. If I were actually a result of the natural process of evolution (with no input or care from a higher power - i.e. a higher power doesn't even exist), then my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook! I prefer to believe that life (and personal consciousness) is eternal and that the force behind it all is God. I've had enough of "eat drink and be merry" only to find it empty and hollow in the end. The strongest connections I've had with other people and with God have been through spiritual experiences brought on through faith, fellowship, prayer, and selflessness.

I'd rather be eating chocolate cake and shitting gold nuggets. But wishing don't make it so, bub. There is no chocolate cake in the kitchen, golden nuggets in the can nor god on high.

Life is not eternal, only ego it seems.

Brad's picture

Life's purpose? To experience feelings of happiness.

Paul in LA's picture

This is pretty superb:

http://www.space.com/imageoftheday/image_of_day_080111.html

Does God Bend Light? Or is He a featherweight.

L.A. Confidential's picture

Brad @ 16:

Life's purpose? To experience feelings of happiness.

Actually it's to become stronger when faced with challenges you don't think you can overcome. Happiness is what makes that bearable.

Paul in LA's picture

Brad @ 16:

Life's purpose? To experience feelings of happiness.

Original purpose of feelings of happiness?

REPRODUCTION.

Anonymous Coward's picture

Regarding comment #10,

For me, the idea of a god that built us from clay and monitors our lives like one might do with lab rats takes the dignity out of humanity. I can do well without a purpose forced on me by a cosmic big brother; the only purpose and the only dignity that can truly matter are those that we give ourselves.

We, as a species, rose from apes and conquered the whole planet. We, as a species, developed language, technology and the arts. We have made it this far, and I will not let that be taken away from us by a pipe dream of the aforementioned big brother figure that dropped it all in our laps like spoilt brats.

Fortunately, the evidence is on my side.

Ron Lawl's picture

http://ronpaulsurvivalreport.blogspot.com/search/label/War%20on%20Science

For the record, Ron Paul doesn't believe in evolution, doesn't believe in the separation of Church and State, and he believes that his faith should play a strong role in his decision making.

Bit NOLA's picture

Amen, Jo!

Every religious experience I had in my younger life was pure delusional bullshit induced by the nuts around me and shared in my own nutty little heart.

Now the really meaningful stuff had nothing to do with J. C, or the Big Man.

Brad's picture

Asking "what is the purpose of life" does tend to open one for being told what purpose others have for you.

Peoples Front of Judea's picture

curt @ 10:

I'd rather be created by a loving God than accidentally evolved from basic matter. If I were actually a result of the natural process of evolution (with no input or care from a higher power - i.e. a higher power doesn't even exist), then my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook! I prefer to believe that life (and personal consciousness) is eternal and that the force behind it all is God. I've had enough of "eat drink and be merry" only to find it empty and hollow in the end. The strongest connections I've had with other people and with God have been through spiritual experiences brought on through faith, fellowship, prayer, and selflessness.

To recap:
You prefer fantasy to reality. You find that to be a comfort in times of need. Good for you.
Reality is bleak. Life is pain. Your life on earth is what you make of it.
Blaming it all on a higher power only tries to shift the blame.

paranoia's picture

Whats interesting in one polls that show Edward as being the best chance for defeating the Republican candidate, yet Hillary and Obama are presented by the media to be the favor. As strong as Edward has become, and painted as a angry man, is the most threat to the corporate. How is it that 70% of the American want to end this war and we get 2 of the most pro-war candidate up front leading the primaries????

metric's picture

curt @ 10

my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook!

Just because no one will remember you in a hundred or a thousand years, why does that mean your life is meaningless? Statistically speaking, no one really gives a crap about you now. That doesn't mean you're worthless, just normal.

Brad's picture

We are here! Yay! Looks like we might get to stay here longer than previous generations, with advances like this-- in theory, a pig heart could be stripped of cells, and seeded with human cells, to grow a replacement. Works in rats. Just one of many advances! You think your gadgets are cool? Just hang in there another ten years for the biotech!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7179604.stm

Jo's picture

Brad @ 23:

Asking "what is the purpose of life" does tend to open one for being told what purpose others have for you.

'Zactly. Or as my Mama used to say, " You go around looking like you don't know the answers, someone's gonna give you theirs."

Paul in LA's picture

Ron Lawl @ 21:

For the record, Ron Paul doesn't believe in evolution, doesn't believe in the separation of Church and State, and he believes that his faith should play a strong role in his decision making.

But L Ron Paul has some graven images of himself he wants to make legal tender. Apparently with every two RPDs you get change on a burning cross dime.

Ex-Canuck's picture

curt @ 10:

I'd rather be created by a loving God than accidentally evolved from basic matter. If I were actually a result of the natural process of evolution (with no input or care from a higher power - i.e. a higher power doesn't even exist), then my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook! I prefer to believe that life (and personal consciousness) is eternal and that the force behind it all is God. I've had enough of "eat drink and be merry" only to find it empty and hollow in the end. The strongest connections I've had with other people and with God have been through spiritual experiences brought on through faith, fellowship, prayer, and selflessness.

There you go, anthropomorphizing a concept again. I bet you actually think "god" looks like a white haired old man sitting on a throne among wing-wearing "angels".

I really don't care what beliefs you use to give your life meaning beyond the humdrum existences we all have, just don't tell me what to believe. Also, do not judge me for my beliefs that happen to be different from yours. If you happen to need the crutch of religion to help you get through the day, so be it. I respect your need for that kind of support. Just don't expect that others need it too.

Bit NOLA's picture

Don't really think there's anyone around who knows the purpose of anything.

That presumes that there is a purpose and that the aimlessness of the universe is null and void. To be sure, there's lots of cause and effect, but everywhere I look I see perfectly abundant repetition and perfectly beautiful uselessness that suffers loss everytime someone proposes some ultimate use for it.

Galaxies and planets are smashing together as we type, and the point is...what?

My happiness!!!!!!!! ME, ME, ME, ME, ME. Of course. That must be it. Or maybe it's all about W's happiness. He's having a helluva time, and nothing's gonna change his world. Happiness Pie! MMMMMMMM.

Brad's picture

Bit NOLA @ 32:

Don't really think there's anyone around who knows the purpose of anything.

That presumes that there is a purpose and that the aimlessness of the universe is null and void. To be sure, there's lots of cause and effect, but everywhere I look I see perfectly abundant repetition and perfectly beautiful uselessness that suffers loss everytime someone proposes some ultimate use for it.

Galaxies and planets are smashing together as we type, and the point is...what?

My happiness!!!!!!!! ME, ME, ME, ME, ME. Of course. That must be it. Or maybe it's all about W's happiness. He's having a helluva time, and nothing's gonna change his world. Happiness Pie! MMMMMMMM.

Do you have a problem with happiness?

Jo's picture

As far as evolution goes, I like to think of myself as linked to the past and hopefully the future. I love the fact that I can go out in my yard and feed the raptors. I know they are just waiting for us to fuck up so they can have their own back.

It won't be long now.

Bit NOLA's picture

No, I have a problem with self-delusion and selfishness.

FranIam's picture

Thanks for the linkage Bluegal.

As for me - I am happily both a Christian and believe in evolution. They are not mutually exclusive to me or to many other people like me.

It is anyone's right to believe in pure creationism. However, I would have to say that as we head into a more complex social/cultural and technological world, I would rather not have a president who was limited by his creationism beliefs.

For the record, we have many ills, but Catholics (which I am) do not take the Bible literally.

And as far as the Bible goes, most of it has God dragging people into the future, not reverting them to the past. We should take heed to do the same FWIW.

Brad's picture

Bit NOLA @ 35:

No, I have a problem with self-delusion and selfishness.

Well I hope you can overcome those challenges.

Lusmu's picture

Ex-Canuck @ 30:

There you go, anthropomorphizing a concept again. I bet you actually think "god" looks like a white haired old man sitting on a throne among wing-wearing "angels".

I really don't care what beliefs you use to give your life meaning beyond the humdrum existences we all have, just don't tell me what to believe. Also, do not judge me for my beliefs that happen to be different from yours. If you happen to need the crutch of religion to help you get through the day, so be it. I respect your need for that kind of support. Just don't expect that others need it too.

Hear, hear. And stop trying to pretend that your literal interpretation of the Bible means that it is a science book and that your inane ideas of the world of science need to be taught in schools.

Guy Honda's picture

Nice cartoon. Funny spin on a famous picture. Don't feel like getting all political at the moment so I'll avoid commenting on the open thread for now hehe. I'll get all worked up :D

Bit NOLA's picture

Oh, I have. It helped when I learned that accomplishment is a tad more important than my general satisfaction with my self.

Happiness is well and good, but easily programmed. Other things are a Bit more challenging and worthwhile.

Brad's picture

Bit NOLA @ 40:

Oh, I have. It helped when I learned that accomplishment is a tad more important than my general satisfaction with my self.

Happiness is well and good, but easily programmed. Other things are a Bit more challenging and worthwhile.

The difference between affirming "I am wonderful" and genuine earned self esteem from productive effort.

Bit NOLA's picture

It's the achievment that counts. Where it meets with others.

Again, self-esteem and even regard for your own effort are far, far , far from the point.

Brad's picture

My feelings don't count?

tyree's picture

paranoia @ 25:

Whats interesting in one polls that show Edward as being the best chance for defeating the Republican candidate, yet Hillary and Obama are presented by the media to be the favor. As strong as Edward has become, and painted as a angry man, is the most threat to the corporate. How is it that 70% of the American want to end this war and we get 2 of the most pro-war candidate up front leading the primaries????

mass stupidity????

Andy K's picture

Form Ishmael.org:

The Question (ID Number 733)...

Near the conclusion of "Ishmael," you proclaimed that humans in the Taker culture have stopped evolving, because they do not live in the hands of the gods. This is the only idea of yours that I cannot wrap my mind around. I don't understand how or why evolution would cease for a segment of one species but not for another segment of the same species...especially considering the segment for which evolution supposedly has ceased contains the vast majority of the total species' population. In addition, how have the Leaver peoples evolved, and what proof do we have of that evolution?

...and the response:
[from author Daniel Quinn]

You have three different questions here. Regarding the first question, I would say that the members of our culture have simply removed ourselves from the conditions under which evolution takes place; this is the whole point of taking our lives into our own hands. To say that I "proclaimed" it suggests that the statement is to be taken on faith. I would say rather that I merely asserted it, and presented grounds for the assertion, which will be examined in greater detail below.
Regarding the second question, it's entirely possible for one "section" of a species to evolve separately from other sections–if the conditions under which the one section live become different from the conditions under which the others live. An excellent example of this can be found in the very distinctive physical differences that developed among Leaver peoples living under the conditions of the far north–-the Eskimos. Over time (hundreds or thousands of years), their bodies adapted to two significantly different conditions from the rest of humanity: severe cold and the absence of nearly all forms of edible fruits and vegetables, leaving them with a diet that consisted almost entirely of meat. By contrast, immigrants to Alaska from the lower United States do not have to adapt to these conditions, because they bring with them central heating and supermarkets supplied with food from the south. This illustrates very clearly why these Taker immigrants are not evolving: they don't need to; they're shielding themselves from the conditions under which evolution takes place.

I believe the answer to the second question also answers the third. The Eskimos exemplify how Leaver peoples evolved, and their physical differences from peoples of the south constitute proof of that evolution.

The questioner had a follow-up query: Would a reasonable alternative hypothesis to your assertion that people in the Taker culture have stopped evolving be that they do continue to evolve but not how they would have if they had adopted a Leaver culture? I cannot think of an example to offer, but the idea is that Takers continue to evolve in a way that perhaps is not beneficial to them or in a way that reflects their Taker culture.

My reply: Evolution is not an ongoing, inevitable process, like, say, aging. It's a response to new conditions that favor some individuals (who survive to reproduce) over others (who do not survive to reproduce). I can see no conditions at work today that would have this effect on humans. When (and if) the combined effects of our impact on the environment finally combine to cause a general ecological collapse, there will be no time for Homo Sapiens to adapt (just as there was no time for Tyrannosaurus or Triceratops to adapt).

Swashbuckler's picture

Saw this on Digg: 100 Greatest Quotes from fundamentalist christian chat rooms

The main site is down, but dugg trends has it: http://duggmirror.com/comedy/100_Greatest_Quotes_from_fundamentalist_chr... A few of the evolution related ones:

- There are a lot of things I have concluded to be wrong, without studying them in-depth. Evolution is one of them. The fact that I don't know that much about it does not bother me in the least.

- You got it backwards. Creationism is based upon science, reason and tons of evidence. Evolution is based on the blind acceptance of superstitions and fairy tales.

- I can sum it all up in three words: Evolution is a lie

- I often debate with evolutionists because I believe that they are narrow mindedly and dogmatically accepting evolution without questioning it. I don't really care how God did what He did. I know He did it.

- [Replying to 'as for not seeing evolution it takes several million years... incase you missed that memo...'] several million years for a monkey to turn into a man. oh wait thats right. monkeys dont live several million years.

- Everyone knows scientists insist on using complex terminology to make it harder for True Christians to refute their claims.

- Deoxyribonucleic Acid, for example... sounds impressive, right? But have you ever seen what happens if you put something in acid? It dissolves! If we had all this acid in our cells, we'd all dissolve! So much for the Theory of Evolution, Check MATE!

- Muslims countries aren’t as interested in ID because they don’t need to deal with nearly as much atheist scum evolutionists with their evolving mind tricks. All our liberties are allowing the atheists here to destroy our society. George H.W. Bush was intelligent and thoughtful enough to say that atheists shouldn’t really be citizens. Maybe his son will have the intelligence to make a similar point, maybe in his next state of the union adress outlaw evolution. He wouldn’t need to say much, simply something like “every evolutionist is now an enemy of the Republic,” and then explain why. The muslim countries know how to deal with these people(one of the rare things they do right). Why can’t we follow their lead?

- all the evolutionists, tell me something. i know how the big bang "has happened, but tell me, wouldnt an explosion, especially one that size, take away life instead of allow it? think about it. ex: the a-bomb, the h-bomb, grenades, cannon balls (when fired from a cannon of course), mines, rocket launchers, and anything and everything in between. they all have taken lives.

- Don't you know that evolution is basically a racist concept? Some evolutionists still teach that white people evolved from "negroes" who evolved from apes-- Meaning "white people are more evolved!"

wisedup's picture

All religions are based on belief. Sience leaves belief out. Prove it I say. I'm for any system that inspires us to be good to eachother,but something that is 'untrue' is 'untrue' whether we like it or not. A fried egg that looks like jesus, is not proof.

Andy K's picture

wisedup @ 47:

All religions are based on belief. Sience leaves belief out. Prove it I say. I'm for any system that inspires us to be good to eachother,but something that is 'untrue' is 'untrue' whether we like it or not. A fried egg that looks like jesus, is not proof.

Faith, not belief. Because I believe in things that can be proved. ;)

Bit NOLA's picture

They count less than you want to admit. But, hey it's just my opinion. I would just recommend that people think more about their thinking. Later.....

Peter G's picture

Brad @ 13:

If we were engineered to be slaves for workship (archaic spelling,) that would help explain the tendency to look to others for guidance, rather than to suffer pain from effort-driven context-building.

I have my share of university degrees and consider myself reasonably well read but I confess that I am baffled. Can anyone interpret the above quote. Babelfish does not do bullshit to english.

Brad's picture

Peter G @ 50:

Brad @ 13:

If we were engineered to be slaves for workship (archaic spelling,) that would help explain the tendency to look to others for guidance, rather than to suffer pain from effort-driven context-building.

I have my share of university degrees and consider myself reasonably well read but I confess that I am baffled. Can anyone interpret the above quote. Babelfish does not do bullshit to english.

Case in point.

Andy K's picture

Peter G @ 50:

Brad @ 13:

If we were engineered to be slaves for workship (archaic spelling,) that would help explain the tendency to look to others for guidance, rather than to suffer pain from effort-driven context-building.

I have my share of university degrees and consider myself reasonably well read but I confess that I am baffled. Can anyone interpret the above quote. Babelfish does not do bullshit to english.

I'm not touching it with a pole of any length.

However, my old neighbor, the 6' 9" Stan Przybysz, would say it don't make no sense anyhow.

Brad's picture

Andy K @ 52:

Peter G @ 50:

Brad @ 13:

If we were engineered to be slaves for workship (archaic spelling,) that would help explain the tendency to look to others for guidance, rather than to suffer pain from effort-driven context-building.

I have my share of university degrees and consider myself reasonably well read but I confess that I am baffled. Can anyone interpret the above quote. Babelfish does not do bullshit to english.

I'm not touching it with a pole of any length.

However, my old neighbor, the 6' 9" Stan Przybysz, would say it don't make no sense anyhow.

again, case in point

kate's picture

Brad - thanks for Ron Paul dollar link. what a hoot! Not only is there a disclaimer at top announcing that "only the first $2300" of proceeds can be donated to the campaign, but also there is a little bit further down inviting one to 'get in' as a seller for a special fee.

So not only are the Paulians silly, Ron Paul and others are making a mint - quite literally offa his campaign push, but also they are running an MLM as well. Wow, I wonder if Paul would propose that all government offices run on an MLM pyramid scheme basis. What a buncha loons.

Peter G's picture

Andy K @ 52:

Peter G @ 50:

Brad @ 13:

If we were engineered to be slaves for workship (archaic spelling,) that would help explain the tendency to look to others for guidance, rather than to suffer pain from effort-driven context-building.

I have my share of university degrees and consider myself reasonably well read but I confess that I am baffled. Can anyone interpret the above quote. Babelfish does not do bullshit to english.

I'm not touching it with a pole of any length.

However, my old neighbor, the 6' 9" Stan Przybysz, would say it don't make no sense anyhow.

I get it now. Zen and the Art of Pretension. Grasshopper, what is the sound of one gland flapping?

Brad's picture

head hurt. thinking, bad.

Andy K's picture

Peter G @ 55:

Andy K @ 52:

Peter G @ 50:

Brad @ 13:

I have my share of university degrees and consider myself reasonably well read but I confess that I am baffled. Can anyone interpret the above quote. Babelfish does not do bullshit to english.

I'm not touching it with a pole of any length.

However, my old neighbor, the 6' 9" Stan Przybysz, would say it don't make no sense anyhow.

I get it now. Zen and the Art of Pretension. Grasshopper, what is the sound of one gland flapping?

(brad)

************
And, Brad, workship is not an archaic spelling. It's an archaic word, maybe, but it's still spelled the same way today as it was many years ago.

bubba's picture

curt @ 10:

I'd rather be created by a loving God than accidentally evolved from basic matter. If I were actually a result of the natural process of evolution (with no input or care from a higher power - i.e. a higher power doesn't even exist), then my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook! I prefer to believe that life (and personal consciousness) is eternal and that the force behind it all is God. I've had enough of "eat drink and be merry" only to find it empty and hollow in the end. The strongest connections I've had with other people and with God have been through spiritual experiences brought on through faith, fellowship, prayer, and selflessness.

So what you would rather be true is your standard? Hows that working out for ya?

Many christians agree with the theory of evolution. The Catholic Church itself finds the evidence strong and has no problem with it. It's usually only certain christians, usually fundamentalist protestant ones, who are literal creationists.

The head of the human genome project is a born again christian himself. He recently wrote a book trying to dissuade christians from believing what the nutjobs in the creationist racket try to sell them.

Swashbuckler's picture

curt @ 10:

I'd rather be created by a loving God than accidentally evolved from basic matter. If I were actually a result of the natural process of evolution (with no input or care from a higher power - i.e. a higher power doesn't even exist), then my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook! I prefer to believe that life (and personal consciousness) is eternal and that the force behind it all is God. I've had enough of "eat drink and be merry" only to find it empty and hollow in the end. The strongest connections I've had with other people and with God have been through spiritual experiences brought on through faith, fellowship, prayer, and selflessness.

You do realize that what you'd prefer to believe has nothing to do with what actually happened, don't you?

Peter G's picture

Andy K @ 45:

Form Ishmael.org:

The Question (ID Number 733)...

Near the conclusion of "Ishmael," you proclaimed that humans in the Taker culture have stopped evolving, because they do not live in the hands of the gods. This is the only idea of yours that I cannot wrap my mind around. I don't understand how or why evolution would cease for a segment of one species but not for another segment of the same species...especially considering the segment for which evolution supposedly has ceased contains the vast majority of the total species' population. In addition, how have the Leaver peoples evolved, and what proof do we have of that evolution?

...and the response:
[from author Daniel Quinn]

You have three different questions here. Regarding the first question, I would say that the members of our culture have simply removed ourselves from the conditions under which evolution takes place; this is the whole point of taking our lives into our own hands. To say that I "proclaimed" it suggests that the statement is to be taken on faith. I would say rather that I merely asserted it, and presented grounds for the assertion, which will be examined in greater detail below.
Regarding the second question, it's entirely possible for one "section" of a species to evolve separately from other sections–if the conditions under which the one section live become different from the conditions under which the others live. An excellent example of this can be found in the very distinctive physical differences that developed among Leaver peoples living under the conditions of the far north–-the Eskimos. Over time (hundreds or thousands of years), their bodies adapted to two significantly different conditions from the rest of humanity: severe cold and the absence of nearly all forms of edible fruits and vegetables, leaving them with a diet that consisted almost entirely of meat. By contrast, immigrants to Alaska from the lower United States do not have to adapt to these conditions, because they bring with them central heating and supermarkets supplied with food from the south. This illustrates very clearly why these Taker immigrants are not evolving: they don't need to; they're shielding themselves from the conditions under which evolution takes place.

I believe the answer to the second question also answers the third. The Eskimos exemplify how Leaver peoples evolved, and their physical differences from peoples of the south constitute proof of that evolution.

The questioner had a follow-up query: Would a reasonable alternative hypothesis to your assertion that people in the Taker culture have stopped evolving be that they do continue to evolve but not how they would have if they had adopted a Leaver culture? I cannot think of an example to offer, but the idea is that Takers continue to evolve in a way that perhaps is not beneficial to them or in a way that reflects their Taker culture.

My reply: Evolution is not an ongoing, inevitable process, like, say, aging. It's a response to new conditions that favor some individuals (who survive to reproduce) over others (who do not survive to reproduce). I can see no conditions at work today that would have this effect on humans. When (and if) the combined effects of our impact on the environment finally combine to cause a general ecological collapse, there will be no time for Homo Sapiens to adapt (just as there was no time for Tyrannosaurus or Triceratops to adapt).

Brad's picture

consciousness that is

Peter G's picture

Sorry about that. Hit the wrong button before finishing the comment. Mr Quinn's answer is purest nonsense. We have not stopped evolving because we can't. It may be true that some external forces no longer have significant effect on human evolution, predation is a good example. I don't much worry about getting eaten by something on a day to day basis. We have also learned to modify our environment to suit ourselves. Nevertheless the fiercest competition is not between species but withing a given species. As long as a population of humans sufficient to propagate exists we will evolve.

Andy K's picture

Peter G @ 63:

Sorry about that. Hit the wrong button before finishing the comment. Mr Quinn's answer is purest nonsense. We have not stopped evolving because we can't. It may be true that some external forces no longer have significant effect on human evolution, predation is a good example. I don't much worry about getting eaten by something on a day to day basis. We have also learned to modify our environment to suit ourselves. Nevertheless the fiercest competition is not between species but withing a given species. As long as a population of humans sufficient to propagate exists we will evolve.

Sorry, Peter, but I think that if you read Quinn in context(and I apologize for presenting a less-than-whole Quinn), you might come to a different conclusion. Quinn writes about inter- and intra-species conflict and presents the arguments that we of the Taker culture have changed the rules of the game so that we not only have halted human evolution- at least in the vast majority of the species which is part of that culture- but we have taken the place of the gods themselves so that we no longer live in harmony with the rest of the life on earth, and in fact disallow the natural evolution of the life forms with which we were formerly interdependent.

Sorry if I assume that you haven't read Quinn. Have you?

Daddy-O's picture

This should convince all the idiots that Kucinich and Paul are the best choices:

Who Takes Money From Lobbyists?
By Justin Gardner | Related entries in 2008 Election, Money

The answer?

Everybody…

Hillary Clinton: $567,950
John McCain: $340,365
Mitt Romney: $229,475
Rudolph W. Giuliani: $212,100
Fred Thompson: $90,000
Barack Obama: $76,859
Duncan Hunter: $30,900
John Edwards: $18,900
Mike Huckabee: $6,964
Ron Paul: $0
Dennis Kucinich: $0

Brad's picture

Daddy-O @ 65:

This should convince all the idiots that Kucinich and Paul are the best choices:

Who Takes Money From Lobbyists?
By Justin Gardner | Related entries in 2008 Election, Money

The answer?

Everybody…

Hillary Clinton: $567,950
John McCain: $340,365
Mitt Romney: $229,475
Rudolph W. Giuliani: $212,100
Fred Thompson: $90,000
Barack Obama: $76,859
Duncan Hunter: $30,900
John Edwards: $18,900
Mike Huckabee: $6,964
Ron Paul: $0
Dennis Kucinich: $0

but integrating these facts into proper context makes my head hurt.

Brad's picture

so screw it. Go TEAM!

Brad's picture

Hillery = McCain + Romney!

Guy in PDX's picture

[Caption reads]
"Illegal aliens can file for health care in this office to our right"

BC's picture

curt @ 10:

I'd rather be created by a loving God than accidentally evolved from basic matter. If I were actually a result of the natural process of evolution (with no input or care from a higher power - i.e. a higher power doesn't even exist), then my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook! I prefer to believe that life (and personal consciousness) is eternal and that the force behind it all is God. I've had enough of "eat drink and be merry" only to find it empty and hollow in the end. The strongest connections I've had with other people and with God have been through spiritual experiences brought on through faith, fellowship, prayer, and selflessness.

Wow. How pessimistic & depressing an outlook.
What I have never understood about flat-earthers (oops, creationists) is that because you've evolved by process from an ape, you are nothing but an ape & life is meaningless. It is also quite simplistic & binary to believe that if you are evolved from an ape, the only thing left is to be existentialist & 'eat drink & be merry'.
Several thousand generations ago, my ancestors were ape-like, but that doesn't mean I'm condemned to mimic their lives. I have more powers of thought, reason, compassion & every other ability humans have than any variation previously. My life isn't meaningless. My life's meaning is to use those qualities to the best of my abilities for the best of intentions. You can too, and if you need a device called God to allow yourself to do it, all power to you. The downsides of only allowing yourself to be your best using dogmatic religion is those same religions are manipulated by men with less than the best of intentions and have been since day dot.

Remember, none of those positive qualities you've mentioned require a belief in any particular God or Gods. They are human & universal.

=my2c
BC

kaypicts's picture

Topic: CNN dickhead Glenn 'wide stance' Beck.

Sounds to me what he encountered was a demoralized workforce.

So his point is that the health care workers need more training?

Otay's picture

curt @ 10:

I'd rather be created by a loving God than accidentally evolved from basic matter. If I were actually a result of the natural process of evolution (with no input or care from a higher power - i.e. a higher power doesn't even exist), then my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook! I prefer to believe that life (and personal consciousness) is eternal and that the force behind it all is God. I've had enough of "eat drink and be merry" only to find it empty and hollow in the end. The strongest connections I've had with other people and with God have been through spiritual experiences brought on through faith, fellowship, prayer, and selflessness.

Well then, you should be glad to know that evolution is not an accidental process. It is guided by what I think are the laws of nature, but what you are welcome to believe is a deity. No conflict necessary.

Brad's picture

Andy K @ 57:

************
And, Brad, workship is not an archaic spelling. It's an archaic word, maybe, but it's still spelled the same way today as it was many years ago.

In a lecture titled Lost Secrets of the Sacred Arc by Sir Laurence Gardner, Gardner looked in the English Language Word Etymological Dictionary from Oxford University that traces the origin of words.
He went back 700 years, said you find that the word we use as worship had a "k" in it.

Otay's picture

Brad @ 31:

http://www.libertydollar.org/ld/ronpauldollar

Perfect symbology. "Trust in God", and right below that in large letters: "Ron Paul".

Brad's picture

Symbols for the symbol minded.

Andy K's picture

Brad @ 73:

Andy K @ 57:

************
And, Brad, workship is not an archaic spelling. It's an archaic word, maybe, but it's still spelled the same way today as it was many years ago.

In a lecture titled Lost Secrets of the Sacred Arc by Sir Laurence Gardner, Gardner looked in the English Language Word Etymological Dictionary from Oxford University that traces the origin of words.
He went back 700 years, said you find that the word we use as worship had a "k" in it.

Apologies, Brad. Thought you were using the archaic form of workmanship.

Or maybe you intended worthscipe or the Old English weorthscipe.

Brad's picture

Andy, Gardner's point was that we were laborers before worshipers, that we worked for the pan-cultural "gods." I think he meant the word worship got fluffed up into mystical contexts later.

Paul in LA's picture

Daddy-O @ 65:

This should convince all the idiots that Kucinich and Paul are the best choicesRon Paul: $0 Dennis Kucinich: $0

Unlike Dennis Kucinich, L Ron Paul wants TO PRIVATIZE ALL FEDERAL LANDS, including the national parks.

And you think he doesn't take money from lobbyists???

Bwah-ha-ha-ha.

He doesn't REPORT money from lobbyists--that's a different matter entirely.

Brad's picture

Paul in LA @ 78:

And you think he doesn't take money from lobbyists???

Bwah-ha-ha-ha.

He doesn't REPORT money from lobbyists--that's a different matter entirely.

Care to back up that assertion? Bwah-ha-ha-ha.

wisedup's picture

#48 Andy K, good point. Some say 'I believe in this or that'...but have no proof. Wishing,hoping,and faith are all based on future proof. I've been told for 60 years that jesus is coming back and send me right to hell or something. I think it's time I took off my fire suit.

Hold's picture

curt @ 10:

I'd rather be created by a loving God than accidentally evolved from basic matter. If I were actually a result of the natural process of evolution (with no input or care from a higher power - i.e. a higher power doesn't even exist), then my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook! I prefer to believe that life (and personal consciousness) is eternal and that the force behind it all is God. I've had enough of "eat drink and be merry" only to find it empty and hollow in the end. The strongest connections I've had with other people and with God have been through spiritual experiences brought on through faith, fellowship, prayer, and selflessness.

I agree. Your life is essentially meaningless. But mine ain't.

Brad's picture

When the meaning and purpose of life becomes a question, so does the value of it. This opens up the door for initiative force against individuals and the groups they may constitute.

Otay's picture

Brad @ 75:

Symbols for the symbol minded.

And we have for our symbol-minded...the Ron Paulites. Or should I say the L Ron Paulites.

Brad's picture

Otay @ 83:

Brad @ 75:

Symbols for the symbol minded.

And we have for our symbol-minded...the Ron Paulites. Or should I say the L Ron Paulites.

What a staggering pronouncement. Simply withering.

Otay's picture

What meaning can your life have, if it only has meaning in the context of what a distant ancestor did, followed by what you believe concerning what he did, and what you believe concerning whether someone "erased" the crime of what he did?

Sounds like a pretty paltry meaning, to me.

Otay's picture

Brad @ 84:

Otay @ 83:

Brad @ 75:

Symbols for the symbol minded.

And we have for our symbol-minded...the Ron Paulites. Or should I say the L Ron Paulites.

What a staggering pronouncement. Simply withering.

Nothing staggering in the mundane.

Otay's picture

Withering, perhaps. But only if one considers oneself a Ron Paulite. Then again, I guess every party has their personality cults.

flashbazzzbo's picture

why would the lack of belief in an invisible puppetmaster constitute "a meaningless life"????i'm not only insulted,i'm pissed! talk about arrogance."i believe in invisible men,who intervene on my behalf,well,sometimes,when i mumble under my breath with my eyes closed,and hands held in the proper manner,and if you dont,well,your life has no meaning!!"gimme a fucking break! i have two fine human beings in my children,whom i've raised without the prospect of burning in everlasting hellfire by some allegedly benevolent father figure who lives in the clouds.this being the same guy who "loves us as his own".my wife and i have been together for 21 yrs now,and life as i see it is just damn good!not always butterflies and unicorns,but who's is? and dont try to say that the believers have it any better,because we all know that adversity is a fact we deal with on this planet.christians that i know have all the same trials and tribs that we all do,in spite of their individual skydaddies,so essentially your argument is without merit,in fact ,i would say that anyone that believes in omnipotent deities has noticed throughout their "meaningful lives" that their prayers have often gone unanswered,and that us godless heathens have done quite well for ourselves."judge not,lest ye be judged,eh???your arrogance is appall(ing,but i notice that this is a common trait among those who claim to know the "truth",as is explained in a book written 2000 years ago by men prone to superstition and myth.sorry for the rant but,damn!!!!!!!!!(this particular heathen is also given to the occasional run on sentence!!sorry,everybody!)

Brad's picture

If I may dictate the meaning of your life, I may choose to reduce it and extract from it as I please. You are put upon this earth to serve others, for example. If you ask, naturally, "what is the purpose of others?" I might be stumped. But most people will willingly fall onto the sacrificial altar of some fashion, while an elite group of parasites sit back and giggle at the sad absurdity.

LT's picture

curt @ 10:

I'd rather be created by a loving God than accidentally evolved from basic matter. If I were actually a result of the natural process of evolution (with no input or care from a higher power - i.e. a higher power doesn't even exist), then my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook! I prefer to believe that life (and personal consciousness) is eternal and that the force behind it all is God. I've had enough of "eat drink and be merry" only to find it empty and hollow in the end. The strongest connections I've had with other people and with God have been through spiritual experiences brought on through faith, fellowship, prayer, and selflessness.

You can believe whatever you want, that's your right. But understand that evolution isn't a matter of belief. It's a reality, and wanting or not wanting to "believe" it is irrelevant. Reality is what people need to learn. If their own beliefs collapse as a result of facing reality, then so be it. I suggest looking at your life as precious. If indeed we only get one, then it's all the more important we get the most out of it. Why focus on what comes after it? Enjoy it now, live to the fullest, be good to others, and learn and grow.

SadButTrue's picture

Bit NOLA @ 8:

Or just forget all about it. I give up.

fixed it Bit NOLA - Sitemonitor

No, sitemonitor, you didn't fix it. Here is the corrected link to the video about Pat Robertson Talking WITH God.

Good link Bit NOLA.

diamondmc's picture

curt @ 10:

I'd rather be created by a loving God than accidentally evolved from basic matter. If I were actually a result of the natural process of evolution (with no input or care from a higher power - i.e. a higher power doesn't even exist), then my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook! I prefer to believe that life (and personal consciousness) is eternal and that the force behind it all is God. I've had enough of "eat drink and be merry" only to find it empty and hollow in the end. The strongest connections I've had with other people and with God have been through spiritual experiences brought on through faith, fellowship, prayer, and selflessness.

This is just another reason why our education system in this country is in shambles. Here we are in this country debating creationism vs evolution. The rest of the world is not having this debate, there spending there time and money teaching there kids in sound science. My girlfriend works as a stem cell scientist. There are 12 other scientists in her lab, and she is the only american. The rest are from India, Japan, Germany and England. I have know problem in anyone believeing in the tooth fairey, but not in my schools. The rest of the world is beating our brains out when it comes to teaching science, math and deductive reasoning.

Spaghetti Monster's picture

curt @ 10:

I'd rather be created by a loving God than accidentally evolved from basic matter. If I were actually a result of the natural process of evolution (with no input or care from a higher power - i.e. a higher power doesn't even exist), then my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook! I prefer to believe that life (and personal consciousness) is eternal and that the force behind it all is God. I've had enough of "eat drink and be merry" only to find it empty and hollow in the end. The strongest connections I've had with other people and with God have been through spiritual experiences brought on through faith, fellowship, prayer, and selflessness.

Is the god your talking about is the one who puts us here with all our predetermined faults and then says if we don't fix them we'll burn in hell?

Yeah we DO need to be saved... from whack jobs who preach this shit and try and force their unfounded unproven delusions to be taught as "science".

ysbaddaden's picture

If y'all wanna get further insight into the god delusion one should read:

Persinger, M.A. Feelings of past lives as expected perturbations within the
neurocognitive processes that generate the sense of self: contributions from
limbic lability and vectorial hemisphericity. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
1996, 83, 1107-1121.

It was primarily about the belief in past-lives and reincarnation, because of the prevalence of past-life regression therapy. Of course reincarnation was anathemized by the Council of Constantinople in 553 CE, which also anathemized the teachings of Origen. However, Jesus had a chance to teach against the doctrine but evaded the question.

9:1 And as [Jesus] passed by, he saw a man which was blind from [his] birth.

9:2 And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind?

9:3 Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.

How could this man commit a sin to cause blindness that was present AT birth, unless he had a previous existence?

Persinger's article inferred that certain symptoms like light epilepsy, fairly prevelent in the creative community, could cause feelings of leaving the body or of an alien presence, or of alien voices and ideas, and ocular and olfaction. It could've been carried foreward into an argument for the similiarity to the whole prophetic experience.

Origen's full name was Origenes Adamantius, and was an early church father circa the 4th century later anathemized for what appeared to be Gnostic teachings.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3g5G0PFuXQ

ysbaddaden's picture

Ocular and olfaction hallucinations.

joe's picture

this is by far the best thread EVER. :)

General_Rennenkampf's picture

curt @ 10:

I'd rather be created by a loving God than accidentally evolved from basic matter. If I were actually a result of the natural process of evolution (with no input or care from a higher power - i.e. a higher power doesn't even exist), then my life is essentially meaningless since I will eventually die (as will everyone else) and be forgotten to have ever existed within a hundred years or so. What a bleak outlook! I prefer to believe that life (and personal consciousness) is eternal and that the force behind it all is God. I've had enough of "eat drink and be merry" only to find it empty and hollow in the end. The strongest connections I've had with other people and with God have been through spiritual experiences brought on through faith, fellowship, prayer, and selflessness.

Believe what you want. Reality, OTOH says something very different. The Ancient Egyptians believed the souls of the dead came back and that they would live a life (presumably an animate one) in statues. Obviously, no African golems were stalking the Nile Basin and howling "Lemme outta here, I'm bored!" Why is it that Christian talk of an Afterlife should be different? Oh, and people can "Eat Drink and Be Merry," yet the next day they are fat and with a hangover.

Who cares what we think about death? All the Christian saints are dead, the third of Europe's populations scythed down by the plague is dead. For that matter, everything before us and everything after us will die, also. Our particular species of ape is arrogant, arrogant enough to believe in an eternal existence denied stars and galaxies. Yes, our reward is death? What of it? Our atoms will one day help make up future species, and the mixture of ours and theirs even more future species, until 5 billion years into the future and the Sun flares up and life is sterilized. Who gives a sh*t? None of us will be around to see it!

Better to focus on making your life more enjoyable now, as opposed to worrying about Biblegod coming down.

ysbaddaden's picture

98 General_Rennenkampf

They funny thing is that in the Books of Matthew and Mark, they described saints rising from the dead and walking among the populace to be seen and recognized during the three days of darkness falling after the crucifixion. Luke and John don't mention these other resurrected figures, nor do most churches today.

The thing is that Jews didn't really have the concept of saints, so how could there already be so many dead saints before Jesus was even crucified, because there was no church as such yet?

Brad's picture

General_Rennenkampf @ 98:

...Our particular species of ape is arrogant, arrogant enough to believe in an eternal existence denied stars and galaxies. Yes, our reward is death? What of it? Our atoms will one day help make up future species, and the mixture of ours and theirs even more future species, until 5 billion years into the future and the Sun flares up and life is sterilized. Who gives a sh*t? None of us will be around to see it!

Better to focus on making your life more enjoyable now, as opposed to worrying about Biblegod coming down.

Part of making life enjoyable, for some individuals, involves promoting medical and scientific breakthroughs to protect and extend our healthy, youthful functioning. The voices of conservative Leon Kass, and liberal Daniel Callahan, prominent "bio-ethicists," insist we live plenty long and as a collective, should be concerned and put a stop to the "arrogant" efforts of scientists working to defeat involuntary aging and death. Naturally, many people love their own lives and their relationships with friends and family, are saddened at loss of function, dignity and life, and on that basis disagree with this "concern."
Our species of primate enjoys advantages not bestowed upon rocks and stars. We can use our minds and tools to effect changes that benefit ourselves. Nothing arrogant about it.

Brad's picture

ysbaddaden @ 99:

so how could there already be so many dead saints before Jesus was even crucified, because there was no church as such yet?

The New Testament is Hellenic cult mysteries gussied up in pseudo-Judaic interpolations. The Old Testament was lifted from non-religious Sumerian texts.
Stolen, twisted, and presented for your consumption.

zorro's picture

Barrack Obama’s book called “Audacity of Hope” in the third chapter titled the Constitution is revealing. Of course it has the standard text book commentaries on the wonders of Democracy, the elements of the Constitution, and it’s founders, are tied up here, too loose and not as positive or siding with an open mind. Many of his characterization of the theme in organized constructive government is depressing, negative and leaves out the high value of sharing our founding fathers had is considered hypocrisy, and likely tied to what even he commits to imply, America is not ready for a black president.

Obama, highlights the genius of the Constitution, and specifically the thirtieth, fourteenth, and fiftieth amendments passed as a Union finally perfected. A very amazing statement that does not support harmony and unity Obama makes claim in his “Audacity of Hope” in the beginning Prologue.

In the third chapter page 97 last paragraph he starts with inspiration and ends with doubt, he says,

“How can I, an American with the blood of Africa coursing through my veins, choose sides in such a dispute? I can’t, I love America too much, am too invested in what this country has become, too committed to its institutions, its beauty, and even its ugliness, to focus entirely on the circumstances of its birth. But neither can I brush aside the magnitude of the injustice done, or erase the ghosts of generations past, or ignore the open wound, the aching spirit, that ails this country still”.

Very well said to cast away the founding circumstance of freedom and liberty from tyranny, casting away the birth of Americas Constitution? An incredible thing to say all while giving love and praise for beauty and ugliness. The biggest uncertainty is the very last statement suggested by Obama. But what are the Ghosts of past generations, or the open wounds, what is that acing spirit that ails the country. And, please, Senator Obama, if you don’t know what they are how do you expect to unite and change the country or the world ?

For in the beginning of Obama’s Prologue He said: “ That’s the topic of this book: how we might begin the process of changing our politics and our civic life. This isn’t to say that I know exactly how to do it. I don’t. Although I discuss in each chapter a number of our most pressing policy challenges, and suggest in broad strokes the path I believe we should follow, my treatment of the issues is often partial and incomplete. I offer no unifying theory of American government, nor do these pages provide a manifesto for action, complete with chats and graphs, timetables, and ten-point plans”.

From the Prologue to the third chapter is a monumental contradiction of ideals and personal thoughts Obama presents. A grand surprise for someone that taught the Constitution at the University of Chicago for ten years. A very sad surprise. Obama admits in the very start He doesn’t know how he would do anything. But clearly in his campaign speeches offers change you can believe in. Very extraordinary.

Otay's picture

ysbaddaden @ 99:

98 General_Rennenkampf

They funny thing is that in the Books of Matthew and Mark, they described saints rising from the dead and walking among the populace to be seen and recognized during the three days of darkness falling after the crucifixion. Luke and John don't mention these other resurrected figures, nor do most churches today.

Nor do any of the Jewish or Roman records. I would have thought somebody would have noticed a bunch of dead people wandering around.

General_Rennenkampf's picture

Shh, don't tell, my family has records of the flesh-eating Zombies of Calvary, and we've kept them secret for years. The Romans had a helluva time with those Zombies, and you've almost spoiled our secret.....

Lol.

Comments are closed on this entry