Iraqi Defense Minister: U.S. needed until at least 2018
By Steve Benen Tuesday Jan 15, 2008 8:15amOver the last couple of months, much of the political discussion regarding the U.S. policy in Iraq has been centered around the perception of progress. Civilian casualties are down. Military casualties are down. Political progress doesn’t seem quite as elusive. Iraq 2008 appears more like Iraq 2005 than Iraq 2006. No matter what the specifics of the question, conservative Republicans answer the same way: Bush’s policy is “working.”
On the flip side, of course, is reality. Iraq is still unstable and unsafe. Political progress is practically non-existent. And for all the GOP talk about “victory” and “success,” we continue to get news like this.
The Iraqi defense minister said Monday that his nation would not be able to take full responsibility for its internal security until 2012, nor be able on its own to defend Iraq’s borders from external threat until at least 2018.
Those comments from the minister, Abdul Qadir, were among the most specific public projections of a timeline for the American commitment in Iraq by officials in either Washington or Baghdad. And they suggested a longer commitment than either government had previously indicated.
Pentagon officials expressed no surprise at Mr. Qadir’s projections, which were even less optimistic than those he made last year.
There are quite a few key parts of Qadir’s remarks, but the fact that he’s “less optimistic” may be the most striking. After all, the Kristol/McCain/Lieberman wing of the political spectrum is telling us, incessantly, about how encouraged we should all be, and chastising anyone who dares to question what they see as incontrovertible progress.
And yet, here we have the Iraqi defense minister conceding that Iraq won’t even be able to control its own streets for another four years (eight Friedmans), or protect itself from foreign rivals for another 10 years (20 Friedmans). In fact, he went on to suggest it might not be until 2020 that the country can fully protect the integrity of Iraq’s borders.









Login or Register to post comments.
sure, 2018. no problem.
sure its working . . . if you like moral and national bankruptcy, compromised principals, flouted international prisoner conventions, trampled constitutional protections. It's been just peachy. Don't forget that the same media whores telling us its working are the same ones who told us it would be a cakewalk, too.
At least he's not saying 6 more months.
The Iraqi Poiticians have us by the balls and are going to milk this country for all it's worth.This is another fine mess you've gotten us into Jorge.
Don't worry folks....
According to John McCain....the troops will be home by 12,018 A.D.
$$$
Would anyone want to bet that 2018 would come and go with nothing changing and the date being pushed into the future?
lol! fuck you lazy iraqi!
Just like here, the government's words and actions .....do not reflect the wishes of the people. The U.S. military itself conducted focus groups of a cross section of Iraqis and found:
* Until the March 2003 US occupation Sunnis and Shiites coexisted peacefully.
* Iraqis of all sectarian and ethnic groups believe that the US military invasion is the primary root of the violent differences among them.
* After the United States leaves Iraq, national reconciliation will happen "naturally."
* A sense of "optimistic possibility permeated all focus groups ... and far more commonalities than differences are found among these seemingly diverse groups of Iraqis."
* Dividing Iraq into three states would hinder national reconciliation. (Only the Kurds did not reject this option.)
* Most would describe the negative elements of life in Iraq as beginning with the US occupation.
* Few mentioned Saddam Hussein as a cause of their problems, which the report described as an important finding, implying that "the current strife in Iraq seems to have totally eclipsed any agonies or grievances many Iraqis would have incurred from the past regime, which lasted for nearly four decades -- as opposed to the current conflict, which has lasted for five years."
But we're not hearing about that.......
Americans can continue to send C-41 super size cargo planes full of cash to pay off Iraqis so they won't kill each other for another 10 years. Don't think so.
And of course, one piece of information which remains rather conspicuously absent is the question of how conservative that estimate is -- i.e., how dependent it is on the assumption that whatever progress has been made will be consistently maintained over the next four to ten years.
uh mr. iraqi minister? no.
we're leaving next year. get used to the idea so it won't be such a shock when it happens.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=B1U7qgudyww WMD's?
15 years for them to stand up, so we can stand down.
US Department of Energy figures show the world is using about 1000 barrels of oil every second and demand is likely to increase by 70% in the next 20 years.
Mission Accomplished!
L.A. Confidential @ 15:
Don't worry. Supply shortages will bring demand down.
On the news this morning, they were talking about a proposed 50 cent per gallon increase in gasoline taxes in the US. I guess that's why Bush asked OPEC to pump faster.
When that new tax goes into effect, it will be OPEC's fault.
the war is never going to end until we stop using internal combustion engines
So in 2020, we win?
sassafra @ 12:
of course thats assumeing barack obama or shrillay clintons not elected president!or some repig hack! clintons got big oil throwing big bucks at her im guessing baracks getting his share,last night and even before last night hillary said shed have troops left in iraq dureing her terms barack say the same things any repig says we have to keep troops in iraq to protect our interests , that being the embassy the oil the twelve military bases, only edwards says all troops out of iraq in twelve months , his only caviat is a quick reaction force for iraq left in kuwait, wich i dont approve of, anytime the iraq nationalists feel like knocking off a few americans they will be able to if you send in a few troops to quell any upriseing, this makes me unhappy ,if were going to leave then leave!!!!!!!!!!!!if your unhappy with the war and with corporate assholes pulling the strings on our politicians how can you even think of voteing for more of the same bush lite politicians?
Screw that. American military families need their loved ones back here. The Iraqi's are are not helpless and I am sure they will figure something out real quick. Iraq will never govern itself as long as disaster capitalists are screwing things up because Iraq refuses to privatize its oil. Besides Israel needs help with Iran since the U.S. not only has to supply weapons to them but the U.S. has to fire the guns as well. Put an end to the World Bank, IMF, and the military industrial complex's destruction of sovereign nations' economies.
Probably because they knew all along. Bastards.
Hmmmm, I don't know if Exxon can suck them dry that fast....
So, our occupation costs more than $150 per barrel of oil pumped and we pay Halliburton to pump it. Then Halliburton sells us the oil for ~$100/barrel.
Making the cost of a barrel of Iraqi oil, $250/barrel.
Why does the Iraqi defense minister hate Amurika? Why, I bet he wasn't even wearing a flag lapel pin when he made these turrist lovin' statements.
NO
Surprise, surprise, the *Sunni* Defense Minister wants us to stay forever. Once a BushCo crony, always a BushCo crony.
Doesn't say a lot about our ability to "train" these dumfuks, does it? How many units are "operational" now? 5? 1? You sure don't see much of that statistic any more...
The US was really lucky.
What if Abdul Qadir had said '2058'?
That would mean the US future would be fu**ed for the next half-century.
Shouldn't we amend the Constitution so that Abdul no longer is in charge of the US military, and foreign policy?
Economists put the current cost of the war at $ 1 million dollars a minute... and this bozo think we can afford to do this until 2018???
America is crumbling economically as it is... if we stay much longer we will follow the same route the Soviet Union did by bankrupting itself with the Afghan war!
QuestionGirl @ 9:
Thank you for posting that- I'm absolutely sick and tired of our stupid commentators saying things like "we can't solve a 1000 year old war!!!(sunnis vs. shias)" . The fact is that most all the sunnis and shias in Iraq are related by family. There really was not some huge hatred between the two. It is definitely in the US interest to create divisions because if they were unified then US troops would've had a much larger problem on their hands. When the Al-Sammara mosque bombing took place, our government would have us believe it was sunni's behind the attack because they were angry at the shiites. But anyone and everyone knows that theres no way any muslim, sunni or shia would engage in that bombing. Trust me when I say Iraqis(and I bet they're right), believe that it was the US involved with that attack.
Regardless, if the iraqi defense minister believes we should stay there till 2018 he doesn't have the Iraqi people's interest at heart because they will only accept an immediate withdrawal of US troops AND NO PERMANENT BASES.
I believe what he said was mistranslated. What he actually said was, "it will take another ten years until we can ensure that we won't all get shot for failing to govern our own country in even the most fundamental way, and we need the great American bullet shield to remain in place until then."
My repube father-in-law informed me last night that "the war is over" based upon, I can only guess, that the Michigan primary exit polls (Republican ones) indicating that the economy was the voters' top concern (i.e. that the economic disaster now out polls the Iraq disaster).
I politely replied that people are still dying on a daily basis over there, and that we are still spending $1.5 billion per WEEK as well. My reply was met with a sort of condescending silence.
As is typical, I unforunately came up with some better, actually snarky responses after the fact, though if I had used them I probably wouldn't be invited back for dinner anytime soon (imagine my disappointment - snark):
"Oh, good, we win! So can we now bring the troops home with your permission?"
"And it only took the economic collapse of the U.S. middle class to achieve it!"
"Can we go finish the job in Afganistan now?"
"Geese, if that suicide bomber had only waited one more day, all those people would have been alive to see the end of the war, bummer for them... and their families, and..."
"What??? What war? I can only focus on one thing at a time... didn't you know there was a marine missing? He killed a white woman!!!"
please feel free to add to them, I could use some additional fodder for the next assinine comment.
But I do feel much better that the war is officially over, don't you?
"Centered on," not "centered around." Thanks.
/schoolmarm
Do we get free oil during that time? You better decide quick,bush is pumping it out of your country as fast as he can.
"No one could possibly have known that Iraq would turn into a shit storm."
Without vetting Qadir I would surmise that he is a US puppet and will be dead wihtin a year, unless he has great security. JMHO.
Soooooo, that means that some of our troops will be over there for say, their 20th tours by then?
That is a load of crap. Why is it that the Iraqi's are so incompetent that they need 10 MORE YEARS of occupation before they can defend themselves?
The taxpayers of the United States cannot and will not continue to pour more and more money into the black hole of Iraq for 10 more years! The debacle in Iraq is draining our resources - both our treasury and our military forces - and we must stop it right away.
There are PLENTY of other countries who can help Iraq. Why aren't the Arabs getting together a task force to replace the occupying US forces? Why can't Arabs solve this problem? Let THEM spend their money and shed their blood for Iraq. Put some of those windfall profits from $100 per barrel oil to use!
The only way that I would agree for us to remain in Iraq past 2009 is for Iraq to GIVE us their oil - not sell it to us, but outright hand it over - so long as we are responsible for their security. Americans cannot pay $3.00+ per gallon for gasoline and still afford to provide security for Iraq. Give us the damn oil or we're going home. Period.
Jonathon @ 38:
they are giving their oil to the Dubai based Corporation, Halliburton. We pay Halliburton's expenses and they sell it for pure profit.
They are giving their oil away, just like Bush told them to. They are giving it to Dick Cheney's buddies.
That is a load of crap. Why is it that the Iraqi’s are so incompetent that they need 10 MORE YEARS of occupation before they can defend themselves? -- Jonathon
*******************************
Ironic, isn't it (not to mention hypocritical), that the Republican Party which is largely although not solely responsible for dragging us into this godforsaken mess has in at least some ways actually been helping if not encouraging the Iraqi people to depend upon our largesse and apparently sees absolutely nothing wrong with this ? Even though these are the same people who, when it comes to something similar here at home, will quite happily pontificate ad infinitum and ad nauseum to the effect that welfare and other programs designed to provide assistance to those in need ought to be cut because they encourage people to be dependent upon the government instead of taking personal responsibility and hauling themselves up by their own bootstraps?
Bluestocking @ 40:
Nah, they believe in supporting cronies. The people of Iraq are suffering horribly and the Republican leadership is happy with that.
Jonathon @ 38:
Iraqis already have a group capable of defending Iraq, and its led by Muqtada Al-Sadr. Our puppet government needs to come to an end. Iraq's future is in the Iraqi's hands and thats how it always should be.
Besides, like the recent 40,000 pounds of bombs we dropped on Iraq....our "assistance" is pretty poor.
Home by Christmas,...er...Christmas, 2018, that is
And in other war crime news, Halliburton keeps profiting off of ill gotten gains.
This is great news for the Halliburton stock holders! At least TEN MORE YEARS of raping this country's economy.
Saddam managed to do it a lot faster than that. It won't happen until a crazed but charismatic dictator who hates America gathers a power base, overthrows the government, and represses most of the country. Not pretty, but that's pretty much how it usually goes in that part of the world.
I quess they fiqure it will take that long before all Iraq's are dead, so there won't be any wrongfull death suits filed in the United Nations.
Notice 2018 is conveniently until _after_ the next two Presidential elections. He doesn't know. Put it down as "indefinite" like US troops are in Germany and S. Korea.
We have to go no farther then Bush's plan for his permanent military bases (the largest in the world) in Iraq.
When Bush has his puppet government in Iraq (like the one he has in this country) sign the document to let the oil companies steal Iraq's oil,,, Bush wants to make sure the military is there to stay to protect them with our tax money, at no expense to them
The oil companies can destroy our economy with their oil prices , with the use of tax money and the death of our soldiers to protect them to steal the oil, but they move their corporate headquarters overseas so they will pay no taxes to our government.
Why are we and our democrats letting the republicans get by with statements like John McClain makes that they wish to create jobs for our citizens, when it was Bush and the republicans responsible in helping them to be sent overseas.
At the same time given tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations which was suppose to trickle down and the only thing that has trickle down was the jobs cuts, health cuts, wage cut, jobs safety cuts, the retirement cuts and the destruction of our country.
Good Job Brownie!!!!
Login or Register to post comments.