Hardball Power Rankings: McCain, Romney Beat Obama - Rudy Rocks!
Download | play
Download | play (h/t Heather)
The Power Rankings segment on Monday's Hardball left me scratching my head. Hillary Clinton has been riding a wave of primary wins, so it's not surprising to see her atop the list -- but to put Barack Obama below both McCain and Romney defies logic. The reality is that Democratic voters are turning out nearly 2 to 1 over Republicans consistently this primary season and the outlook for the GOP for November is bleak at best.
We know that Chris Matthews has a man crush on Rudy Giuliani, but does he have to make it so transparent? Rudy Giuliani can't even muster enough votes to beat Ron Paul or Grandpa Fred and is down by double digits in his home state of New York, but according to Tweety that puts him just below Barack Obama who has gotten far more votes than McCain or Romney. Makes sense to me...


There doesn't have to be any rhyme or reason to it. Blacks to the back of the bus.
Chris is counting on a big bump for Rudy after Rudy had a snit fit because he couldn't drive the pace car for a lap at Daytona speedway yesterday, and settled for driving his fu*king campaign bus around the track. Once the NASCAR dads see that action on film they are gonna bow at Rudy's throne. As if....
The Market Crash Today: What You're Not Being Reminded Of
Ron Paul has beaten the Ghoul in 4 out of 5 states yet he is above him in the rankings ? chances are Rudy will have to drop out once he loses florida, he's flat broke, unlike Ron Paul who still has money to burn ergo Paul should be above the Ghoul.
The Republicans need to wise up and realize a pro war republican CANNOT beat Obama or Clinton (who is phoney anti war, look at her record for proof of that).
"Where's John?"(Edwards) - the polls show him (as well as Obama) beating all Rethugs, just like Hillary beats all of them.
If this insipid blowhard were around in 1948 he would be boasting about how Thomas Dewey would blow away Harry Truman. This self important bloviator has no class or credibility. Pay attention to him at your peril.
Chris Matthews - Moron, or Fool? You decide!
THE JOHN EDWARDS REVOLUTION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZxOYF9ZAe0
Huck's campaign put out a notice to the press critters this morning, to those who are covering his campaign on the road, that the campaign will no longer arrange transportation for them. I read that to say that's huck's running short on cash.
Remember a couple debates ago when they all got to ask one question to another candidate? I'm waiting for Ron Paul to ask a question at the next Repug debate: "If the network thought it right to keep Dennis out of the Democratic debates, why are you here, Rudy?"
pissed off patricia @ 9:
I saw that story this morning as well, and I agree with you. This election cycle has gone on so long and some of the candidates didn't count on that happening. Some of the candidates are getting low on funds and know that Super Tuesday is coming and they're trying to save up their cash -- especially candidates like Huckabee and Giuliani, who are slipping in the polls and unable to raise much cash.
Didn't Ron Paul beat Goolani in every primary? I don't understand why goolani would even be mention any longer.
At times like this I WISH Olbermann really were head of NBC. He could smack some sense into Tweety.
The only ONLY reason I'd love Ghouliani to win is to watch how quickly he'd shit down people oike Chris Matthews. Let's see how Tweety likes Guantanamo from the inside.
Join me on the stock market slide! Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
When Fox advertises election analysis and football analysis TOGETHER! you know the hidden metaphor for politics has become sports. And that's where "power rankings" comes from, too. And they are just as stupidly subjective in their original context, no wonder Matthews adopted them.
I turned on Joe in the morning today and lo & behold there was Matthews filling in for Joe! Ugh. Usually they have either Willy Geist or David Schuster fill in when Joe isn't there (which is fairly often). But I couldn't stand listening to Chris this morning going on about the polls, primaries, etc.
Another thing that REALLY befuddles me:
Huckabee has won a state. While that doesn't put him in 'frontrunner' territory by any stretch; that ALONE should put him well ahead of Giuliani should it not?
Were this my list to do, it'd be:
Clinton
Obama
McCain
Romney
Huckabee
With Edwards only narrowly being squeezed out since its a 5 person list. (Much as I'm loathe to admit it; he hasn't won any states yet. I'm still hoping that'll change)
Regardless of all the Obama supporters trying to make him as a saint. The corporate republican MSM and the republican rank and file WANT Obama to be the candidate. They know that they will never beat Edwards or Hillary. They want Obama so they can win. Obama will never carry a southern state. There are too many that won't vote for him.
The fiscal destruction of USA Inc. has arrived. Last week we saw the loss of $7 trillion of equity in U.S. capital marketplaces. In other words, $7 trillion in total equity value of all publicly traded U.S. capital marketplaces was lost in shareholder, bondholder or other equity stakeholder value. This is the greatest single weekly loss of equity holders ever. And since U.S. citizens hold about 75% of all domestic securities outstanding, they are the ones who felt the brunt of that diminishment.
The media sure luvs them some Clinton. Wonder what Hill's position would be if she was running on the name Rodham and Bill had never been prez.
Bank of America Corp. said Tuesday its fourth-quarter earnings fell 95 percent, and Wachovia Corp. reported its earnings tumbled 98 percent.
douglas @ 5:
I sent this message to Elizabeth today.
Elizabeth, again the media almost totally ignores John. In all of the debates it is like he is a halogram, he's there then he's not. The media is keeping him from reaching the people and delivering his message. I sent this message to John the other day and I want to make sure he gets it.
I think you need to go to the progresiive radio advertising. The regular MSM is not going to cover you and financing that kind of advertising will use up your campaign funds. As the Rueters article pointed out, they are afraid of you John. On progressive radio, Ed Schultz, Thom Hartmann and others have given you more airtime than any of the MSM. I think you will benefit much more by reaching more of the progressive voter without the negative and dismissive attitude the MSM has given you.
We love your ideas John and the corporate media does not.
Power? What power does Guiliani have? Thus far, he has polled close to Duncan Hunter numbers. Wishfull thinking perhaps?
Marge @ 19:
I agree....as much as I hate to say this...I just don't think America's quite ready for an African-American president...or a woman president...then again, maybe we are, just not these two corporate candidates...
And as for Chris Matthews...I think he's losing relevance by the minute.
Marge @ 19:
I don't think so. I think if you look at the financial support of Hillary, that is EXACTLY who they want as the next Prez. Everything old is new again. Two for the price of one.
L.A. Confidential @ 22:
I'm watching several stocks on a Yahoo ticker and the rate that the volume of stocks is increasing is incredible. It seems like everyone is selling off today. Bide your time, Monty...
mroom @ 17:
It seems to me that Matthews is trying to remake his image. He's trying to be Mr Nice Guy now. Not yelling so much and more calm. Let's see how long that lasts. My guess is someone at MSNBC yanked his chain recently and yanked it hard.
L.A. Confidential @ 22:
Ya, poor banks. Only made " The bank's revenue fell 31 percent to $12.67 billion from $18.49 billion last year."........guess the money "experts" should heed their own advice about bad loans.
L.A. Confidential @ 20:
I've been paying close attention to this since early this morning. At one point, the DOW futures were pointing to a 600 point loss, then the fed rate cut came in. It seems to have done little good. This situation is very grim and the "fantastic five" politicians mentioned above are saying nothing about it.
It's not surprising at all, he's running a Republican campaign, if anybody would actually listen to what he says. He can't out-Republican the GOP candidates so he's behind them. His complaints about Bill Clinton speaking out are exactly the kind of thing we would expect to hear from "W." Don't like being criticized? Well, just deprive the critic of his First Amendment rights and "shut him up." Right? How totally BushCo.
I notice that Obama's supporters are TOTALLY in favor of "shutting Bill Clinton up." No regard for this man's Constitutional rights at all because Clinton's speaking out threatens their objective--George W. Bush incarnate.
Rudy took 5th? - I would have put him 9th or 11th
ConcernedCanuck @ 21:
I wonder what shape this country would be in if Bill Clinton had never been president? If we'd had 8 years of Bush I, then 12 years of other neoCons? To hear Obama's supporters, it would have been preferable to 8 years of the Clinton's equalizing administration.
But then, I wonder what shape the country would be in if the Democrats had simply stood behind Clinton during his troubles instead of voting to impeach him with the Republicans.
[Off topic-Sitemonitor]
kaT @ 31:
No Kat. Bill is campaigning. Period. He is either gotten senile, or he is running for President again. There is no place for that in politics. No former American president has campaigned as much as he is, and he is destroying the Dem Party in the process.
"Without having been his First Lady, if not exactly his only lady, Ms. Clinton would be but a corporate lawyer turned junior senator from New York and with a less than sterling voting record -- including her authorization of the war in Iraq, approval of a war-mongering resolution on Iran and an inglorious bill to criminalize the national epidemic of flag-burning."
Obama is right. Who is he running against? Bill has done more campaigning than his wife has.
Say it with me now, "The media is force feeding you your candidates".
kaT @ 33:
I wonder what the economy would be like without the fake "boom" years under Clinton, without the NAFTA agreement, without the needless daily bombings of Iraqi children, without a prez that needed sexual release from any woman cuz his wife wouldn't, without the..................
mroom @ 17:
This morning on the Joe Blow Show, Matthews actually said the word "jocksniffers", Kinda homoerotic for morning fare.
Chris Matthews is pandering because he is in trouble for his sexist attitude with media matters, daily kos and others... MSNBC is trying to build him up because these groups have come down hard on him and he is just showing that he is open minded, a nice guy and doesn't deserve this... DID ANYONE BUY IT? I think Hillary is still probably No.1 but I wouldn't take Tweety's word for it....
Was in a shoe store over the weekend. Kid who works at the counter was having a political conversation with his co-worker. I listened in for a while. Kid says Mitt Romney's a joke, George Bush sucks, Republicans have been terrible over the last eight years. Then the kid says, if McCain's nominated, he'll vote for him, because he tells the truth and he likes him.
My blood ran cold. It's what Democrats are up against. Tweety's Power Ranking is absurd, but Tweety and the other MSM clowns control the narrative. People like that kid have already bought into it. Hillary's a ruthless bitch (or Hillary's an weak emotional woman who can't lead, take your pick), Obama's not experienced enough (or he's a Muslim, take your pick), McCain's a maverick, straight shooting uniter (or he's a funny guy, take your pick).
Joe O. @ 30:
The DJIA is down 163 points as of 5 minutes ago. I believe the fed rate cut did have a significant positive impact. They started off about 300 down an hour ago. We'll see if it holds.
heliograph @ 40:
I saw John McCain kissing George Bush !
Peter G @ 1:
chrissie is just doing his job of helping place the divisive shillary at the top so she can be knocked off and leaving edwards off the list because his corporate masters fear edwards. no surprise that Obama is last. Chrissie is quite in tune with Diebold.
I have to agree with canuck, here. I think Bill could be causing some serious damage to the Dem party. Look, IMO there is not a whole lot of difference between Hillary and McCain. So, if Obama gets the nod, Bill may have just lined up a whole lot of McCain voters with his over agressive tactics. Don't get me wrong, I loved Bill, I just think he's gone off the deep end here.,
Bystander @ 39:
chrissie is NOT in any trouble. don't believe that for a second. if you look at the (*)NBC agenda, you'll see that it has not changed. corporatist democrats over populist democrats and corporatist repugs over religions nuts. as it plays out, all the pundits are in tune with the Diebold results. all the 'pat' explanations are used to explain the fixed, predetermined results.
Just a market update. Last I saw, minutes ago, the market was only down 111 points. Seems maybe a rebound is underway.
As much as I detest Ron Paul and the ever present Pauletts, I have to say that he has a hundred times better power ranking than Sir Rudy of the 9/11.
bmw 528 @ 41:
Agreed. It is having a positive impact thus far. On the flip side though, all commodities are also, once again moving up at a fast clip because of that rate cut. The problem is, we could see much higher inflation across all sectors once this rate cut filters though. The Government's stimulus package due out later on will have to compensate I think. We will see if the markets read it that way as well.
pissed off patricia @ 46:
It is taking a dive again (192).
Dear C&L,
Please don't put out articles that say things like:
"The reality is that Democratic voters are turning out nearly 2 to 1 over Republicans consistently this primary season and the outlook for the GOP for November is bleak at best."
We don't want any complacency to spread amongst our voters. This race will be a struggle. We haven't even seen the beginning of the smear machine yet. Wait until the Rove lies start to fly.
Yes, American voters are showing up 2 to 1 Democrats at the polls, but this is first, just the primaries and second we are a year away from the general election.
A Complacent Democratic Public is the last thing we need.
In other words ... "America -- STAY AWAKE !!!"
Ron @ 49:
It's going to be a long WEEK.
Joe O. @ 48:
Aren't you glad W was so successful in convincing everyone to tie all Social Security to the stock market?
RayC @ 52:
Yes !! The only part of the Bush Plan To Destroy America that didn't work.
The GOP defies logic and reality. What do you expect?
*cuts out picture of Rudy smiling, pastes it inside a valentine alongside a pic of tower #1 collapsing, holds it up and sighs*
Makes perfect sense to me.
Dear Rudy:
Roses are red
violets are blue
mommy and daddy made me
and 9/11 made you.
I've long since stopped watching that asshole Matthews. I'd rather watch Jerry Springer. His show is honest sleaze and crap, whereas pundits like Matthews pretend to have substance. This morning's Springer show (which I sometimes watch while on the treadmill) was about another of his many love triangles, involving some bloated worker at the Waffle House versus a Cowboy. Sleazy trailer-park soaps and comedy -- a perfect metaphor for the likes of Tim Russert, Chris Matthews, and most of the politicians before us. Listening to Hillary hurling insults at her opponents reminds me of the cowboy versus the waffle house.
Joe O. @ 48:
RayC @ 52:
Inflation is definitely a concern and is incrimentally creeping up to levels we have not see iin years. The Fed's sure doesn't want to have the stagflation we had in the 1970's. Bernanke is going to have a handful for awhile. DJIA is down 179 now according to www.wsj.com.
So, whats everyone going to do to ward off destitution?
We need some ideas.
LOL Matthews is hyping Guiliani, while th chyron tells us of Guilianis previous support of democrats and hes 11 points behind McCain in a New York poll. Yeah hes got a great shot
Does anyone else find the entire idea of doing power rankings for presidential candidates ridiculous?
L.A. Confidential @ 58:
Government subsidized Internet Surfing Homes?
P.K. McBurroughs @ 55:
I think Rudy should get a trademark on 9/11 so he can license out the usage rights. And then he can rename himself Nine of Eleven like Seven of Nine on Star Trek. The Borg Collective and the Republicans share many similarities, so why not just profit more from misfortune?
Fanon @ 44:
billary will destroy the Democratic Party, rather than support anyone else, just ask Gore and Kerry about the tepid support from the Clintons, add shillary's support for LIEberman, who supports McLame and you have a rather dangerous political adversary within the democratic party. many people are already tired of the blindly ambitious couple.
andy @ 4:
Can't let you get away wit this. If you think Clinton is phoney anti war, then you have to say the same about Obama. Their voting records have been pretty much the same while in the Senate. The top 3 Democratic candidates now say they want to pull out of Iraq.
I'd rather vote for a goddamn sock puppet than smelly fascist Hillary.
♥♂ Angry Guy @ 53:
actually, it IS working! the only people who can weather this have already had their tax cuts and have accumulated vast wealth in the last seven years.
I think its beyond a man-fantasy, I think Tweety fears Rudy. Who knows? Tweety trashes Rudy one day, then Berik shows up at his house with Officer O'Malley, then bada bing, and Tweety is "on vacation."
L.A. Confidential @ 61:
first, move your funds out of equities into fixed income. then buy a gun.
Republican could get back in as planned. Now with all the talk about Hillary and Obama it's dividing votes. Karl Rove used God and Religion this time it's going to be race or a woman.
Play on the fact that is America ready for a Black man to be President. Now Obama has done very well but when the racist come out there's your problem. They will point at the proven facts of Obama. He doesn't have the experience or qualification to be President. Yes George W. got in but his Daddy paved the way with money and power. Obama doesn't have that. Now if Hillary get it they will pull the sex card. But the problem with Hillary is she has earned the experience and qualifies but it's the woman thing and Bill. Yes smart move to push Obama he's easier to beat. As you see the Stock Market fall yet again all Americans Dems and Republicans will remember how Bill Clinton built a strong Stock Market and US economy. So with the help of Obama and the African Americans, Republicans will win the White House yet again.
Coconut oil should fix that dry scalp right up.
the repugs stand firmly behind chris matthews PUMPING HIM full
of their reichwingnut juice......and he just loves it !
CoIntelPro @ 63:
Gore shunned the Clintons, which he shouldn't have, and Lieberman was chosen for him to counterbalance the perceived immorality of Clinton's indiscretion. In 2004, Bill Clinton campaigned heavily for Kerry, despite the state of his health, and he brought out crowds in large numbers.
Remember that Lieberman is Obama's mentor. People are only beginning to scratch the surface of "Dr. Feelgood" Obama. What lies beneath is no prettier than what people claim Ms. Clinton is made of.
Marge @ 19:
The Hillbots descend.
Oh, and, please list the Southern States you expect Hillary to carry, especially after she and Bill have pissed of 80% of the black vote...
Tick...tick....tick......
Hint: The Republics and Cross-overs loathe Hillary, so the whole
"Obama can't carry the south" is such a red-herring.
McCain or Romney wipes Hillary out in the South....
Oh, and Kat at 33?
The big dog's economic recovery was powered by Intel and Microsoft, and the entire Tech sector.....
Hillary will inherit NONE of that upturn.
And, folks are right, the Clintons sure act progressive to get elected,
but when in office, Bill in the WH and Hillary in the Senate dash
to the middle......
Just ask Mark Penn and Dick Morris? Nothing like surrounding yourself
with progressives (Snark!)
Straight Shooter
'Remember that Lieberman is Obama's mentor.' .
How so? First time I ever heard that, please elighten me.
"Hardball Power Rankings: McCain, Romney Beat Obama - Rudy Rocks!"
Wadda ya expect from Tweety, he's pandering to his base. Ha!
pissed off patricia @ 28:
The guy is still a douchebag. What was the first thing out of his mouth this morning? Laughing at John Edwards and calling him "that third guy, wouldn't you hate to be that third guy." When the story should have been about how Edwards was the ONLY candidate speaking substance last night, and doing so with passion and commitment, while Obama and Clinton harped on one another like little brats in a sandbox afraid the other was going to take their little pail and sense of self-entitlement away.
I's like to kick the snot out that drooling, sniveling little shit heel.
MCain or Romney beating Obama is not surprising, if you're actually taking into account how bigotted and prejudiced this country really is. Sadly, there are still enough bigots, rednecks and assholes in this country that make it unlikely that a black man will ever be President in our lifetimes, even if it means electing an old geezer like McCain, or a pandering, flip-flopping corporate elitist like Mitt Romney.
Tweety is such a tool....
Putting Hillary at the top of the rankings, when it's clear he loathes
her...
Anyone doubt, when McCain gets the nod, that he goes on the
attack against Bill and Hill? Remember Monica Gate? He was
just this side of Ken Starr in his diatribes against the Clintons....
And, sticking Rudy in? WTF? Ron Paul is doing better then Rudy?
He puts Rudy at #5, and leaves Edwards out?
Edwards BEATS the Republics heads up....
Rudy? Shoot, he's gone after he loses in Florida....
Can you say spin? Chris Matthews is just doing his usual spin for his corporate overlords.
THEY ARE TRYING TO CREATE THEIR OWN NARRATIVE.
It's a power rankings. To some degree I can see how they came up with the standings, but I just don't understand the why MSNBC thinks it's relevant other than to put some sort of positive spin on it for Republicans. Power rankings works well for sports (since stats are not subjective), but I can't see it working for politics. It really begins de-emphasizing issues at hand. So, whatever, the corporate media can do to take away from the issues, they'll do it.
I saw the same segment last night, and as a sports writer (who deals a little with power rankings) here's what I came up with...
The rankings isn't necessarily based upon votes at primaries or caucuses. I'm willing to bet it also has to do with momentum (Hillary, McCain, Romney have it, Obama doesn't), polls (not just party, but head to head), amount of money raised, media attention, etc.
In some respects McCain and Romney are ahead of Obama.
WashStateBlue @ 73:
Educate me. Is the black vote enough to carry ANY southern state? Are you so sure that 80% of the black vote is actually pissed at the Clintons or are you just pulling random numbers out of the air.
I see Hillary picking up Arkansas if Huckabee isn't on the repug ticket.
In the South, I really think Virginia and Florida are the only states in play. The Democrats should definitely not concede the South but they should consider picking up states in other regions.
The Midwest, Mountain West and Southwest. States like Ohio, Indiana, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah can be won.
Obama's in fourth?
I'm calling bullshit.
Perhaps Tweety has the inside scoop on how the voting machines will be rigged. Maybe it's not bullshit after all.
CD @ 83:
No wonder. Hardbull IS a steaming pile of BS and always has been, always will be with the hip-wader wearing shoveler of same as host, and GE as the farmer.
kaT @ 33:
Perhaps we would have not had NAFTA brought to you by Mr. Clinton and carried along by BUSH. Check out the stock market. I droped in 1999 and here we go again. And not you want Clinton back?
nonbeliever @ 82:
Now we got the Hispanic vote to recon with. They like Hillary. Why? I know hispanics and blacks are both fighting for the scraps in the form of low paying jobs and afffordable homes.
Fanon @ 74:
How so? First time I ever heard that, please elighten me.
Gladly. http://tinyurl.com/27tqea
This is common knowledge in the Beltway, that Lieberman is Obama's mentor. Why do you think Obama spoke out against the war yet now that he is in the Senate, nothing constructive has come of his prior rhetoric? Why do you think Lieberman endorsed McCain? Because to endorse Obama would be a kiss of death within the Democratic party.
Also, Tom Daschle is another mentor, or certainly a backer and strong ally.
WHY is anyone still even tuning in to the by now wholly irrelevant buffoon Matthews? Seriously, what credibility has this lowbrow got left? Hardball, my ass.
Don't scratch your head. The REALITY is that ANY one of the top 3 Republican candidates will beat Obama, anyone who doesn't think so, do not know the America we live in. Obama is the Repugs winning strategy, because they know America better than Democrats.
I don't believe a word that spews from the mouth of Chris Matthews or Tucker Carlson. They are two of the biggest non entities on television. Matthews should take time off to take care of his persistant cough and Tucker just needs to come out of the closet.
Chris Matthews gets a stiffy,when he sees Rudy.
CriminalGeorgeW @ 90:
I will vote for him anyway even if he will not win the nomination.
GREG @ 93:
He's talking about the general election. I'll support Obama if he is the nominee but I don't believe for a second he'll carry any state in the South. No way.
Where's Edwards?
nonbeliever @ 94:
I know. I will vote for him against Hillary. Hillary will probably get the nomination.
Notice they left John Edwards off the list because he winds up beating all the Republicans. Such BS propaganda, its sickening. I hope Democrats are smarter than to believe this BS!
Re: Power rating
Matthews, put your money where your mouth is. Count actual votes each has garnered. Count money each has collected, and then explain how either Romney or McCain can be rated above Obama.
GREG @ 96:
And what will you do if Hillary gets the nomination?
more evidence of Tweety's extra chromosome.
I think this is a bogus complaint Logan.
The question is: "Who's got the best shot at being the next president?"
All that's being said here is that the Republican nomination is more up in the air than on the Democratic side.
If Hillary gets the nomination, then Obama has much less of a chance (~0.0%) at becoming the next president than any Republican nominee no matter how pathetic they may be.
i.e. the odds that Obama wins over Hillary are less than the odds that McCain and Romney both beat Giuliani.
Stats confuse us all, but I think you're just injecting an unwarranted controversy into this. That being said, I'd agree that the Hardball presentation is silly, but I didn't even see an implication here that McCain or Romney beat Obama in a general election.
ASK THIS STUPID S.O.B, WHERE THE HELL HE THINKS AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL BE WHILE THIS HAPPENS?
AND WHILE HE IS AT IT, PLEASE TELL HIM WHAT HE CAN DO WITH HIS POLLING DATA.
Don't be so stupid folks. You sent Bush to the White House, based on the polling data these ass holes have been giving you.
When are you going to see through these people?.
If they could beat Obama like those of us who know they are going to kick Hillary in her ass, then why are they not promoting him instead.
They want Hillary in there so bad they are paying both black and white fools to run all over this country to attack any and everything they think may stand in the way and they have done this from the beginning of this election process.
They have successfully ran Dennis Kuccinich out of the way and all the rest that would be a threat to this woman and now they are working on Edwards and while they are successfully breaking him down.
Obama will be next.
Wake the hell up you silly people and learn something about this process or we are going to get this silly woman in place to get her ass kicked by these morons.
Romney has more total votes and more delegates than any candidate on either side!
Comments are closed on this entry