But, who cares about what happens on a show that no one watches?

They should drop Tucker in southeast and see what happens, then maybe he'll understand a thing or two about what discrimination feels like.

But here's the really big news: Barack’s ‘Kill Bill’ Strategy -- Obama Campaign Enlists Monica!

It's not her gender that is the problem!! It's her policy positions!!! She is awful!!!

miss_kitty @ 5:

How would a spoiled rich white boy know this. He's not a chick.

Sheesh. Tucker=thick as pig's shit

Tucker is about as useful as a Bush in the WhiteHouse, but in a chance stroke of luck, he's right........Hillary has never faced anything closely resembling discrimination......although, as a male, I am curious....why does she get the sympathy vote of women? Bill is a wandering womanizer, yet she has done nothing to divorce him ever. I mean why? Because she had dreams of some day being Prez and needed his name, or what is it?

DOgEatDog at Number8 got it right- it is not her gender it is her behavior at these debates that is appalling....and her position on many issues is a Problem ( BTW she and Edwards are not on the SAME page re. Healthcare- only in her mind...she should never have said that...)

about tucker ?
well, I am sure the 8 people that watched him were not shocked by what he said- only that he is still on....

I completely agree that women of all races and socio-economic levels are subject to gender discrimination. However its is a valid tho arguable point to debate whether Hillary is subject to gender discrimination. Personally I think she's doing alright.
For a chick

Concerned Canuck:
just for the record NOT all Women support Hillary...don't worry.

Whenever is see F*cker Carlson, I think of this commercial: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B66q4CzeDjc

At the end of the 2004 Presidential election, the office I workED in tuned in to John Kerry's concession speech. Just as Kerry was coming to the podium, one of my co-worker's waxed philosophical about his vote: "I voted for Bush, because at least his wife knows her place." What a horrible thing to say. I, as the one of only 2 women in the office, felt very discriminated against. With all my blood running to my face, I to got up to leave, only to have him proclaim, "What's the problem, darlin'? See, this is exactly what I meant. Women just don't belong in places where men and thick skin are required." This kind of attitude is exactly the kind of thing that is getting our country no where.

This Tucker son-of-a-bitch has got to go. He and all anti- Hillary nit pickers piss me off. Her saying "lived it", meant she lived through that period of time. Jeezz, everything is taken out of context for exploitive purposes. I guarantee that should Obama get the nomination, I would vote for him, this country will split wide open by underground and open racism. Oh, don't forget the Republican slime added to it.

To reframe slightly: a man who thinks that someone he doesn't want to have sex with expressing a sexual interest in him is grounds for felony assault can't imagine any circumstances in which a woman might be a victim of gender discrimination?

Tucker Carlson and a burned out night light have a lot in common. Neither one has any brilliance. LOL! He'd get the weepy pee-pee award if Doug Giles hadn't whined in a much more ridiculous fashion.

Is C&L supporting Hillary? It sure does come out that way. Obama is fighting all the Clinton lies and we never see anything here about the absolute falsehoods Hillary and Bill have been smearing Obama with. The sickening politics those two are playing should draw the harshest of criticisms from all progressives. I am a big supporter of Obama. I have given his campaign $500 of my hard earned money because I believe in that man's ability to completely change this country. Hillary though is playing extremely dirty. She is throwing out the most vile attacks and Obama has been a complete gentlemen and has not gotten down to her level. Now in the debate he finally stands up to the bully and is pushing back. Where is the sympathetic pictures of Obama here?

Hillary is a rich white woman that has NEVER experienced discrimination. To compare a rich white woman that has had it all to Obama - who lost tragically both parents at a young age and has struggled his whole life because of race .... is downright offensive to me. It saddens me that someone could ever consider Hillary someone fighting the status quo. She is the status quo.

Don't Know My Place @ 20:

At the end of the 2004 Presidential election, the office I workED in tuned in to John Kerry's concession speech. Just as Kerry was coming to the podium, one of my co-worker's waxed philosophical about his vote: "I voted for Bush, because at least his wife knows her place." What a horrible thing to say. I, as the one of only 2 women in the office, felt very discriminated against. With all my blood running to my face, I to got up to leave, only to have him proclaim, "What's the problem, darlin'? See, this is exactly what I meant. Women just don't belong in places where men and thick skin are required." This kind of attitude is exactly the kind of thing that is getting our country no where.

Get the hell out of there ASAP.

What No28 Buddha said is true..alot of sympathy for Hill here at C&L...I would expect a more Balanced approach....What gives ?

Neither Tucker nor Davis enspire any lust in the bosom of womankind.

One you want to mother.

One you want to smother.

I will watch the snooze when it is delivered by George Clooney.

Budda,

Discrimination against women and blacks is real. Latinos are taking huge hit right now on race as well. America is still quite primitive. Obama being black and the discrimination he faces does not and never will negate the discrimination against women. Pointing out discrimination does not constitute a pledge to vote.

Clinton gets the sexist spewage and Obama gets the racist asinine spewage. Both are still serious problems that America faces. Pretending one or the other does not exist because you like one candidate over the other is foolish and self-deceiving.

enigma4ever @ 32:

What No28 Buddha said is true..alot of sympathy for Hill here at C&L...I would expect a more Balanced approach....What gives ?

I believe it's more emblematic of who it is that's criticizing Ms Clinton ; be one thing if it were someone that has been discriminated against , whether it be racially or sexually , it's another coming from some brainless little pinhead like stupid Fucker Carlson.......

broadsword @ 39:

Isn't he cancelled?

Mentally ?

Yes

In America women:

a)used to be property
b)couldn't vote until 1920
c)have never had a member of their sex be president

I am such a strong supporter of women's rights I'm seriously tempted to vote for Clinton just to see the first female president.
But Obama is so damn SMOOTH! Tucker Carlson would look like an anal wart standing next to him.

hillary discriminated against?

when what her and penn are doing?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=iazXbc-3ccU

Lanny and Tucker deserve each other.

It's not like Tucker Carlson ever gets laid anyways, what does he have to worry about? Hah!

I imagine Hillary was at Yale Law School in the late 60s and early 70s. I also imagine she was not like one of the most powerful women in the world at that time. So she was just an attractive young woman some 40 years ago trying to make her way into a man's profession. If you don't think she faced discrimination, you are either really dumb or you need to ask your parents what life was like back then.

One thing that's not new is hate.

Matthews wants to keep Tucker around so he has someone he can claim to be smarter than.

ConcernedCanuck @ 10:

miss_kitty @ 5:

How would a spoiled rich white boy know this. He's not a chick.

Sheesh. Tucker=thick as pig's shit

Tucker is about as useful as a Bush in the WhiteHouse, but in a chance stroke of luck, he's right........Hillary has never faced anything closely resembling discrimination......although, as a male, I am curious....why does she get the sympathy vote of women? Bill is a wandering womanizer, yet she has done nothing to divorce him ever. I mean why? Because she had dreams of some day being Prez and needed his name, or what is it?

Well, he still couldn't state his opinion without making a broad generalization. And I think you're wrong. Bill and Hillary have common political enemies. The personal differences they would have had over Bill's indiscretion were mitigated by mutual sympathy for the unconscionable invasion of their personal lives that should have been theirs alone to sort out. We don't know the depth of their relationship. But we do know if their marriage got destroyed, Republicans would have considered it a victory (cos Republicans are all about family values).

What pisses me off is that Hillary does wear her womanhood on her sleeve. I really don't care what sex she is. I want to know why she is better than Obama or Edwards. Obama doesn't wear his race on his sleeve, yet I'm pretty damn sure he's seen more discrimination than Hillary ever has. What is she trying to imply, that her opponents are sexists? What does this crap have to do with the race other than trying to manipulate women? Bush Jr did the same thing by being "the type of guy you'd want to have a beer with." Huh? How about let's talk about how Hillary's campaign has been smearing her opponents? How about some of the shady characters that are helping her run it?

budda @ 28:

Is C&L supporting Hillary? It sure does come out that way. Obama is fighting all the Clinton lies and we never see anything here about the absolute falsehoods Hillary and Bill have been smearing Obama with. The sickening politics those two are playing should draw the harshest of criticisms from all progressives. I am a big supporter of Obama. I have given his campaign $500 of my hard earned money because I believe in that man's ability to completely change this country. Hillary though is playing extremely dirty. She is throwing out the most vile attacks and Obama has been a complete gentlemen and has not gotten down to her level. Now in the debate he finally stands up to the bully and is pushing back. Where is the sympathetic pictures of Obama here?

Hillary is a rich white woman that has NEVER experienced discrimination. To compare a rich white woman that has had it all to Obama - who lost tragically both parents at a young age and has struggled his whole life because of race .... is downright offensive to me. It saddens me that someone could ever consider Hillary someone fighting the status quo. She is the status quo.

Give C & L a break! How do you suppose Johny Amato and Nicolette eat ?

Silver Owl @ 36:

Budda,

Discrimination against women and blacks is real. Latinos are taking huge hit right now on race as well. America is still quite primitive. Obama being black and the discrimination he faces does not and never will negate the discrimination against women. Pointing out discrimination does not constitute a pledge to vote.

Clinton gets the sexist spewage and Obama gets the racist asinine spewage. Both are still serious problems that America faces. Pretending one or the other does not exist because you like one candidate over the other is foolish and self-deceiving.

Isn't discrimination merely a polysyllabic word for hate? True, there's a more tangible, measurable component of hate in discrimination. However, let's--for the sake of this argument--distill it down to pure hate.

We humans struggle so hard to be spiritual. Why then, is it so easy to hate?

Further, why do we disrespect people by denigrating their personal experiences? If Clinton says that she has experienced discrimination, that is her personal experience. How can anyone else speak about her personal experience? The same is true of Obama. His own experience of discrimination is his and his alone. Only he can speak of it.

How sad that either of them have to play this blame and shame game in order to get ahead in this campaign. I find the blame and shame game distasteful, no matter who plays it. When will we as a species rise above such childish, churlish, hateful ways?

Each of us has been on the receiving end of the blame and shame game. Each of us has experienced discrimination. Our personal responses to these experiences are the most important measure of our spiritual growth. Do we choose to play this awful game, or do we choose to do something different?

Thank you for your comment, Silver Owl. We must be the change we wish to see in the world.

My mother got into UCB at a time when 2% of law students were women. She was is a successful lawyer, retired recently. Tucker has got to be kidding, can we send him back to the sand box?

Ask any woman who is 50 or older. We can tell you some stories about incredibly stupid attitudes and actions. I don't think Tucker knows any women except his mother. Obviously, research is beyond his abilities. He must get on his knees every night and thank God for right wing welfare.

chervilant @ 57:

Isn't discrimination merely a polysyllabic word for hate?

We humans struggle so hard to be spiritual. Why then, is it so easy to hate?

We must be the change we wish to see in the world.

No, hate is an emotion. That is it. it is one of the many emotions we have available to us. just as valid as any other. Discrimination is an action. BIG difference. My motto: Hate me all you want, don't hang me from a tree.

I don't accept your premise that "humans struggle so hard to be spiritual" but even if I did, how would longing to be spiritual negate a valid human emotion?

Any 'change' for the world you envision that does not incorporate and accept all of humanities positives and negatives is doomed to fail.

After failing the D.C. bar exam, Hillary moved to Arkansas where she took a job at the school where Bill worked; she was able to pass the Arkansas Bar Exam; when Bill became Attorney General, Hillary was hired on with the most prestigious corporate firm in the state; only two years later,when Bill became Governor, Hillary was made partner in the firm. Yeah, poor girl.

BTW, Carlson is a jerk.

angelina @ 61:

Ask any woman who is 50 or older. We can tell you some stories about incredibly stupid attitudes and actions. I don't think Tucker knows any women except his mother. Obviously, research is beyond his abilities. He must get on his knees every night and thank God for right wing welfare.

I believe you.I don't mean to suggest that you are 50 or older but I personally turn 50 this year and well remember the patronizing and abusive way in which women were treated back in the day.Mt dad was in the forces and treated us all like fresh recruits-my mother did what she was told.He's dead now,and she has slowly gained some semblance of independence.I don't really blame my dad for who he was.He was simply a product of another unenlightened time.The last 40 years have changed EVERYTHING in ways that are genuinely hard to explain to younger people.What I HATE to see is the kind of back sliding between the sexes that gives the chest thumping male the upper hand.The caveman machismo that is so prevalent in Rap for example.I believe that the future depends on achieving a perfect "balance" and symmetry between both the sexes and the races.A balance between enterprise and community.A balance between Science and God.It is perfection we must seek....Grasshopper. ;)

But obviously being rich and white doesn't hurt in getting in getting onto MSNBC, eh Bow Tie? Douchebag.

Well, this is pissing people off 'cause there is just a little ping of reality in it. The great mass of middle class entrants, you know those first or second generation non-Yale college students from the 60s to now, are just a little suspicious of the 'victim' claims of people who are doing a lot better than themselves. Upper middle class women can like it or not. The suspicion is still there. After a lifetime of hearing from people who are clearly better off how you are implicated in the conspiracy to put them down, entrant level middle class men do build up a little resentment and someone like Tucker may be to heavy handed to tap into that resentment, but the resentment is still there. When women say they are voting for Hillary 'cause she is a woman and by-god-its-time they are perhaps not quite aware of what message they are sending to men who didn't start life on 3rd base.

His full name is Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson. Yes, that Swanson (Foods). There are few who know more about being "rich" and "white" than Tucker Carlson.

Why do we keep giving credibility to these stupid assholes. Every time you give this asshole ink, it furthers the idea that his opinion really matters.
I realize "exposing" them for what they really are is important, but doesn't everybody who reads this blog already know that?
How about just linking to a picture of a big fat pile of steaming shit so we know what were dealing with.
Then we can decide if we want to read about it.

Billy Bob @ 71:

Well, this is pissing people off 'cause there is just a little ping of reality in it. The great mass of middle class entrants, you know those first or second generation non-Yale college students from the 60s to now, are just a little suspicious of the 'victim' claims of people who are doing a lot better than themselves. Upper middle class women can like it or not. The suspicion is still there. After a lifetime of hearing from people who are clearly better off how you are implicated in the conspiracy to put them down, entrant level middle class men do build up a little resentment and someone like Tucker may be to heavy handed to tap into that resentment, but the resentment is still there. When women say they are voting for Hillary 'cause she is a woman and by-god-its-time they are perhaps not quite aware of what message they are sending to men who didn't start life on 3rd base.

I don't get your point.What message is sent by voting for rich upper middle class white MEN?Whats the difference?The fact is,women and Blacks have never been in the position they are in this election to elect one of their own.Should folks vote for someone based solely on their demographic?Probably not,but people usually DO vote for reasons of self interest.

Rich, white, privileged males cannot imagine discrimination of any sort because they have never experienced it themselves.

Who cares what this idiot thinks? He couldn't figure out that bowties look stupid on anyone without a tux until he was in his thirties. He doesn't learn too quickly now, does he?

is tucker too stoopid to merit a thread? just asking.

He forgot "Iron My Shirt"? already?

What a buffoon.

Ah what a Tucker he is. It seems to me his name is misspelled, I’m certain the “T” should replaced by an “F”.

Can someone at Crooks & Liars please provide some picture examples of a few Tucker faithful watching fans of his show?

I am actually questioning that he may not have any viewers at all. His ratings are office generated by execs that are on a propaganda mission to spread the Right's ideology and financed as a tax loss write off.

Can you show any "real" Tucker fans?

Filthy Harry @ 63:

chervilant @ 57:

Isn't discrimination merely a polysyllabic word for hate?

We humans struggle so hard to be spiritual. Why then, is it so easy to hate?

We must be the change we wish to see in the world.

No, hate is an emotion. That is it. it is one of the many emotions we have available to us. just as valid as any other. Discrimination is an action. BIG difference. My motto: Hate me all you want, don't hang me from a tree.

I don't accept your premise that "humans struggle so hard to be spiritual" but even if I did, how would longing to be spiritual negate a valid human emotion?

Any 'change' for the world you envision that does not incorporate and accept all of humanities positives and negatives is doomed to fail.

Hate is a personal choice, often grounded in emotions--Fear? Anger? We humans have free will. We can choose not to hate, regardless of our emotions--and, I would never deny the validity of human emotions.

Please don't quote me out of context. I did acknowledge the actionable component of discrimination.

After years of research, Joseph Campbell found two nearly universal components of our world's religions. The one I was thinking about when I wrote my initial comment is the Soul. If you can honestly say that you haven't contemplated the Cosmic Why you exist, then I assert that you, sir, are an anomaly.

Finally, why did you feel compelled to denigrate my comment? Did I step on your spiritual toes, so to speak? I cannot claim authorship of the quote that seems to be goading you--Gandhi said it first. I just happen to agree.

Tucker, Tucker, Tucker. Not only did Hillary face discrimination when she was young and NOT one of the most powerful individuals in the world, but she is facing discrimination as we speak from the likes of you and the likes of Matthews. Did you already forget his apology for being callous about her gender very recently?

I'm sick and tired of AA playing the victim card and for that matter the race card. Watching the debate I heard Obama tell edwards something to the effect that he might get the white mans vote. If that is not racist, what is. But he gets away with it.
If Edwards would've told obama that he might get the black vote only the AA would be having demonstrations. It's racism in reverse. I wish white america should stop feeling guilty about the the past. By the way I heard some pundints say that hispanics may be racist because we don't support obama in general. What a crock of shit. If we were racist we would have supported Richardson just because he is hispanic. We want the best for this for this country. I'm not lumping all the hispanics together.
If white people said they are supporting edwards because he is white AA would be shitting in their pants, but it's ok for them to say that they are voting for obama to give the black man a chance. It does not matter how good the other candidate is.
And I'm not saying that hillary is the best. they didn't turn on hillrary because of any comments she made. But if anyone understands political science you would know that the president is the one that signs the legislation that MLK fought for. If johnson hadn't signed Civil rights would not exist, but he doesn't get credit for it. THAT IS RACISM IN REVERSE.

chris @ 94:

Blue Lensman @ 58:

chris @ 54:

Amen Tucker, tell it like it is brother!

chris, why am I not surprised?

Because somewhere back deep in your lefty brain you know I'm right....

Sure, Tucker told it like it is on Cross Fire and John Stewart helped get that rag off the air.

Tucker is the afterbirth of Crap-0-lie-ly, how in the world did the good doctor think he was doing the matriarch (O-lLie-ly) a favor by slapping this sucker to life, it would have been best to let it live perpetually in a petri-dish where it originated.

YANK THIS DOCTORS LICENSE.

Just look at this country folks and then look at all these little trashy ass holes like tucker, Shaun Hannity and all the rest of this sleaze, called American media in their continued efforts to give some kind of credibility to any one of these disgusting Republicans, who want to continue destroying this country.

Now I know that people cannot be as stupid as they are making many of us look with this on going race game they are playing.

It should be clear to all watching the debates last night, that Senator Obama had little or no choice at all but to come out and defend his record against both of his opponents and there is nothing wrong with questioning any of them on their records, but to out and out lie and spread false information for the purpose of winning is just vile and disgusting to say the least.

Any of us that took the time to listen to the clip of exactly what Senator Obama really said on the issue of the impact that President Regan made in this country, knows full well that he was not making that statement in praise of this man or the republican party at all and yet President Clinton, a man whom I and many other Americans have held in the highest of esteem, many times when many others did not. Simply and completely spewed false information in his desperate efforts to support his wife's candidacy.

The issue of yet another very bad decision in judgment by Senator Clinton in voting for the Bankruptcy bill that is was clearly very devastating to the citizens of this country and I know as all of us that engage in regular political arguments, as we listen to Air America and our wonderful blogg sites, contact our Congress members, begging them to do the right thing on these issues that are clearly major plays by the corporations that have controlled this country to the point we are now in a recession. she had to know it was the wrong thing to do, yet again she made a very serious judgment call as she did with the lead up to the war. This is fair game folks and media is not going to call it for us so we have to be smart enough to investigate this critical information on our own.
Like her vote to give President Bush the go on the illegal war in Iraq, which she now claims, that if she knew then what she now knows, she would not have voted for it.

With this bankruptcy bill, she now claims,that she mistakenly voted for it and is somehow glad it did not come into play. Folks, none of these people are asking her why would you vote for a bill that controversial in the first place?, It's not like you did not know it would be devastating to the American people. if you know it is a bad bill to vote for, then don't vote for it in the first place.

She is voting on these bad policies over and over and then claiming to be ready on day one to lead this country. Bull shit

In fairness Senator Obama has not always made decisions I agree with either, however he has been more focused on issues that are highly controversal and clearly damaging to the citizens of this country and more important, will listen to our views before finalizing them.

She did the right thing to question Senator Obama on his voting patterns, because it would concern American people of why he would vote like he did on a bill that would be dangerous to the well being of women in this country, but if she is going to do that, she needs to kick her aids that ran this information down for selling her bogus information. She looked real bad on this one. (I'm sure someone got fired on this one, I know I would)

Senator Obama's bid for the office of the presidency has been clearly damaged, by not just the cheap attempts of distorting his record by the Clinton machine, but also his own Black constituents as we are all witnessing, every single day in this rotten media, who are so dame scared of this man, it is pathetic.

All this crap is being force fead to us for a reason folks and we cannot be so stupid to let these people play us out of pocket again. I cannot believe this shit.

They are not scared of Senator Clinton at all and why should they be with the goods they have on her and President Clinton, but you can take one thing to the bank and that is, they are terrified of Senator Obama and they have every reason to be.

It is hard to keep from vomiting, when you think of sending one of these bigots to the White House.

However if we continue allowing them to tear us down and destroy us with this new version of a race food fight. That is exactly what this country will get.

This national media have a reason to not go after the Clinton dynasty, because she is one of the only candidates they can and will beat in a national election, because she is one of the only candidates that harbors so much dislike and hate, from both parties.

Some people may not like Senator's Obama or Edwards, but I never hear of out and out hate or discuss for them like is the case for Senator Clinton and the campaign she is currently running is adding to her treasurer chest of hate mongers, that is clearly not going to be in the best interest of the democratic party or this country.

We really have to learn how to disregard these bogus polls, they continue to feed us and go with much of what we know and that we have accomplished on our own in the liberal media and our bloggs, because they are going to overload us with the current shit they feed us and if we do not pay attention to the fine print, they will win again.

It's great to see a conservative tout pulling one self up from their bootstraps, only to reward them for becoming successful. ;-)

.

I'll give Tucker his argument.
Yes (s)Hillary has lead a privileged life...
But I haven't lived in her shoes enough to know if she personally has experienced discrimination.
However, I don't need to go around in heels like the DRAG QUEEN of 9/11 to know that women do experience discrimination.

Keep laughing you Tucker

Tucker Carlson is truly one of punditry land's biggest idiots. Why these people get platforms to express their retarded opinions is beyond me. They certainly add nothing to the political discourse. Right wingers just seem to have issues with powerful women in general.

"tucker tuesday" sounds like a special at the gay bar

I'm just taking it that Tucker and the others are there to balance Keith Olbermann. But it's an opinion thing... Though... C'MON.. more people slam on Hillary 'before' she went for the senate. And so many people saying they dislike her for being her -- not to be confused for being herself.. but simply because she exist.

I see a lot of discrimination for Hillary...It's kind of funny the black man got a big pass.

I am a straight, White Protestant Male. Back in 1966 I was talking to 2 people, one Black and the other Jewish. 3 years earlier, I lived in Switzerland. I experienced discrimination and prejudice because I was an American. The other talked about how they experienced prejudice. I started to say "I experienced prejudice ...' when the Black person cut me off and said "How couly you, a Male Wasp, know what it's like to experience prejudice?" then walked away before I could answer him.

Since when has Tucker experienced life as a woman? "Of my two "handicaps" being female put more obstacles in my path than being black" - the late, great Representative Shirley Chisholm.

Oh, STFU Tucker. WTF do YOU know about it anyway?

Robt @ 87:

Can someone at Crooks & Liars please provide some picture examples of a few Tucker faithful watching fans of his show?

I am actually questioning that he may not have any viewers at all. His ratings are office generated by execs that are on a propaganda mission to spread the Right's ideology and financed as a tax loss write off.

Can you show any "real" Tucker fans?

Carlson could reach a bigger audience if he went into Manhattan office and then opened a window and started yelling out of it...........

Senator Hillary Clinton do not have any more experience than Senator Obama. Crawling on and Climbing up on a President in the White House does not Constitute political experience. The sexual experience she was getting wasn't even good enough or Bill wouldn't have taken advantage of an intern (-:

Wow Tucker, what a discriminatory statement you made about her not being discriminated against...

MORAN

McMetal, Senator Obama didnot have to answer what was obvious even to a blind man.

Hillary is not discriminated against. Her dirty laundry is just out in the public for the public to talk about.

jwf @ 127:

Every time I hear Tucker speak, it reminds me of the yapping sound that Dino, the cartoon dog from "The Flintstones", makes.

Hey that is no ordinary cartoon dog on the Flintstones.

That was Adam and Eve's ride to the Garden of Eden ; Mike Gomer Pyle Huckleberry says so ............

MCMetal @ 128:

jwf @ 127:

Every time I hear Tucker speak, it reminds me of the yapping sound that Dino, the cartoon dog from "The Flintstones", makes.

Hey that is no ordinary cartoon dog on the Flintstones.

That was Adam and Eve's ride to the Garden of Eden ; Mike Gomer Pyle Huckleb says so ............

Love to see the republics nominate Huckleberry. A holy roller with a son who is trying to emulate Michael Vick's off the field behavior.

MSNBC , sans Keith Olbermann , is a cesspool.........

I was just flipping through the channels , and caught Joe Scaborough ; he had on as a "guest" , Larry Kudlow , after BS'ing with Mike Huckleberry (for about the 10,000th time).

This Kudlow putz was prattling on about the Dow Jones and the US economy.

Here's that idiot's partial bio : He opposes estate taxes, as well as taxes on dividends and capital gains. Kudlow advocates that employees be compelled to make greater contributions to their pension and medical costs, suggesting that these expenses are an undue burden on corporations. Kudlow defends high executive compensation as a manifestation of market forces and opposes most forms of government regulation. He believes that reducing taxes will increase governmental revenue through expansion of the overall economy. In general, he supports smaller government that interferes less and citizens who take more individual responsibility.

Working for someone means they shouldn't be liable for your medical coverage and/or retirement ?

What the hell is with these Cancervative schmucks ?

A woman who knows @ 129:

The ones who should really be ashame is all who voted for President Bush. His purpose of becoming a president was to still oil and head to Iraq. There are oil mines in Texas, and all along the coast of California etc... but he needed to finish his daddy's business and everyone knows it.

The reason Obama is #1 because Bush Lies, the Clinton's lie and owe everybody from lobbist to interns.

I'm sorry to inform you , that just because you and I , and most everyone here knows what Chimpy is all about , doesn't mean everyone in the US does ; check out the 20%'ers and their stupid insistence on still backing the retarded simian.......

Think they're willing to vote for anyone other than the loser GOP nominee ?

so in an attempt to discredit tucker you say are saying that Hillary is not a white, rich female that has lead a priviliged life?

Let's be honest, she may have faced discrimination but haven't we all in some form. Hillary is hardly a victim.

I guess rich white people slamming rich white people is hardly Crooks and Liars worthy. Just because she is a dem doesn't mean she gets a free pass. What her and her husband have done to push Obama's "blackness" front and center is horrible.

Putz or not I sort of agree that Hillary is hardly a victim we should pitty.

Bystander @ 139:

donviti @ 136:

so in an attempt to discredit tucker you say are saying that Hillary is not a white, rich female that has lead a priviliged life?

Let's be honest, she may have faced discrimination but haven't we all in some form. Hillary is hardly a victim.

Hillary did not come from a rich family, she worked through college and had a student loan... The Clintons were not rich when they were in the Whitehouse, they lived on their salary, they became rich when they wrote their books....

so you are saying Hillary is a victim? Look all I'm saying is this post smells of feigned disgust over something Tucker said is all. I don't like Tucker he is a putz, but I mean come on Hillary a victim? Sure she had a student loans, but Yale? Board of Walmart? What are you talking about she lived on her salary in the Whitehouse?

Steve Charb @ 141:

Unfortunately, the moron is half right. Hillary's faced more sexism in the past 2 weeks (from the media) than in her whole life.

am I that moron? woohoo I'm half right! more than my wife gives me credit for!

donviti @ 140:

Bystander @ 139:

donviti @ 136:

so in an attempt to discredit tucker you say are saying that Hillary is not a white, rich female that has lead a priviliged life?

Let's be honest, she may have faced discrimination but haven't we all in some form. Hillary is hardly a victim.

Hillary did not come from a rich family, she worked through college and had a student loan... The Clintons were not rich when they were in the Whitehouse, they lived on their salary, they became rich when they wrote their books....

so you are saying Hillary is a victim? Look all I'm saying is this post smells of feigned disgust over something Tucker said is all. I don't like Tucker he is a putz, but I mean come on Hillary a victim? Sure she had a student loans, but Yale? Board of Walmart? What are you talking about she lived on her salary in the Whitehouse?

What I am saying is that the Clinton's had no other source of income except their salary when they were in the Whitehouse... The repugs spent 6 yrs. looking, didn't find none... So she put herself through Yale, pretty impressive... She was on the board at Wal-Mart because Sam Walton was helping with the education program in Arkansas.. Who have you been listening to, the "angry white guys?"....

Its amusing when a corporatist/'libertarian' con-servative attacks a woman who grew up a de-facto republican for being 'too rich & white'....

How white is Tucker? Well, son of a wealthy banker & socialite mother (heir to Swanson frozen food fortune), private schooled (through college), from CT (lots of racial diversity there...(cough)). Jobs have been writing for con-servative publications, and subsequently becoming a con-servative talking head who ultimately lost his job to poor ratings & Jon Stewart exposing his lack of integrity. "Tucker" on MSNBC, is consistenly the lowest rated show....yet...its still on the air...hmmm...guess GE feels they need to keep his drivel to 'balance' Olbermann & the 'moderate' (cough) Spitball/'Hardball' Matthews...

So...this isn't the pot calling the kettle....we have to come up with a whole new idiom for this...

It takes a lot of guts for someone as dumb as pucker to talk in public, but he does. After looking at the photo of pucker very closely, it appears he has has a very small penis surgicaly attached to the end of his tounge. Anyone else spot this?

She didn't claim gender discrimination. She won the debate, why would start leveling complaints? Barack Obama is the whiner. After Hillary lost in Iowa she or her campaign did not start crying fraud, or corruption. She got up in front of her supporters and the cameras and very succinctly stated that she lost because she didn't WORK HARD ENOUGH. She said it was her fault.

Imagine Barack Obama taking the blame for anything! LOL! He's too busy yelling Racism! They're picking on me! I can't tell who I'm running against! Oh, Boo Hoo.