The Chris Matthews Show: Are The Lobbyist Revelations Going To Hurt McCain In November?
Download | play
Download | play (h/t Heather)
John McCain's base is the media, he's made no attempt to hide it. So it's no surprise to see the media downplay any allegations that may tarnish Mr. Clean's reputation. In fact, a full two-thirds of the Matthews Meter (12 regular talking heads on his show) don't believe that these revelations will hurt him at all. Of course, if the media keep dismissing it, it's easy to see how they'll be right.
But Chris Matthews gives the money quote at the very end:
Often times, journalists know things they don't report and that knowledge guides their reporting.
Exactly. It will be interesting to see how much more will be revealed as other sources build on the original story.
John Amato: Notice how the panel of the Matthews Meter say the lobbyist infiltration of McCain's campaign won't hurt him in the general election. That's probably because they'll do their best to shield him along the way...




Bill Clinton Comes to McCain’s Defense
Huffington Post has an article about a McCain/Abramoff connection.
Tweety knows enough to know McCain's in trouble.
Tweety couldn't find tits in a strip club.
I think the 100 years in Iraq will hurt hum worse. That one is not going away. Any one that doesn't already know that he takes funds from lobbyists must live on a different planet.
Ron @ 5:
thats 24% of the USA btw, blissfully ignorant and happy to be.
I wish Tweety would just shut the fuck up. He's irrelevant. People who watch him with anything but seething disgust are ignorant morons.
this is just another set of crooks making sure
one of their guys is safe at the expense of truth.
That's not the question. The real question is: Who in their right mind ever thought Chris Matthews was a competent journalist?
But don't worry everyone, Mitt "Ronald Reagan" Romney may come back to save the GOP if McCain doesn't work out!
Why does McCain have to always have his bleached used car looking wife stand behind him? I think she's creepy.
slippytoad @ 7:
I'm an ignorant moron but I still watch him with seething disgust.
he make me feel yucky. :(
Methinks tweety ought to toddle over to FucksNews and offer his services there...
...and they ALL swill cocktails from the same trough !
Barney Google @ 4:
ROFLMAO! Good one. These are the same idiots who don't understand why 75% of the country thinks the economy sucks.
Just drop it down the old GOP memory hole Tweety.
STOP THE GOP WITH THESE..... THE MISSING LINK.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67ANtTZpCmE&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moNznL7RFG4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xu29F8NfRvI&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U39zae4IxUA&feature=related
McCain left the woman who raised his children and waited for him while he was held prisoner for a much younger woman who was also rich and able to finance his political career. The woman who marries an adulterer is always aware that he may do the same thing to her. Was he unfaithful to his second wife? Who cares?
We need a guy who knows about economics. Not someone who wants to start another war for which we can't pay.
Homo say whaa? @ 17:
Lest we forget - Cindy McCain was John's mistress before she became Mrs. McCain.
"Often times, journalists know things they don’t report and that knowledge guides their reporting."
Ya, and other times they sit around a briefing room with their thumbs up their asses to afraid of having their patriotism questioned as the government lies, poorly, to get the country to go to war.
Its a toss up
Ron @ 5:
I actually think the sex angle would damage him more. If that is confirmed, the evangelicals (whom he's already on thin ice with) will revolt. They'll stay home on election day, or worse, break off with their own candidate.
chrissie and his ilk.
or why I don't know anyone who believes what they see/hear from cable.
Too bad they don't have photos of McCain in a dress.
Barney Google @ 2:
I saw that article to. If this current lobbyist scandel doesn't hurt McCain then the combination of this scandel along with the Abramoff lobbyist scandel surely will.
It's interesting how this story is being spun. If you read the NYT article nowhere in it will you find that the reporters accused him of infidelity. They assert that members of McCain's inner circle felt that his relationship with a certain lobbyist was inappropriate. That is a vastly different thing. It's funny that no one has speculated on who this snitch or snitches might be. If I were looking I'd start with the members of the campaign team he ditched early in the primary season.
unfrozencaveman @ 20:
I agree. The sex angle is and always will be the main focus for the Conservative Evangelicals. They can not tolerate that in any regard. James Dobson of Focus on the Family already hates McCain. It will only be a matter of time before the more "Liberal" Evangelicals follow suit.
Dan Abrams had a piece on this McCain/lobbyists thing and does not understand why the media is giving it a pass. I think McCain "gets by with a little help from his friends."
Abrams also had a fair piece on the Don Siegelman Story.
I might also add that McCain's lobbyist problems not only stem to the lobbyists that he currently has favorable connections with. Other, more powerful Conservative lobbyist groups absolutely hate him. The GOA (Gun Owners of America), several Conservative economic and many socially Conservative lobbyist groups have nothing but negative things to say about McCain. The GOA's entire front page is all negative towards McCain.
The clowns in the media will circle their little clowncars and protect McCain with everything they can. They love him because he makes himself available to them, they socialize and party with him (Cindy lives in Arizona while he's in DC), and it is one big cozy little fraternity. I doubt they will report his deep involvement with Abramoff and keeping a lid on others who should have gone to jail as a result of the findings in that case.
How you can even watch these people on television is beyond me. They are all fakers who have massive egos.
Will the lobbyist revelations hurt?
Null hypothesis: 'who the fuck knows?' i.e. let's say 50-50.
8 out of 12. So if 2 fence-sitters change their vote, suddenly it's 6-6. Null hypothesis not rejected i.e. not worth reporting.
John Amato: Notice how the panel of the Matthews Meter say the lobbyist infiltration of McCain’s campaign won’t hurt him in the general election. That’s probably because they’ll do their best to shield him along the way…
Good Point.
They won't succeed at shielding McCheater. Conservatives won't forgive and forget this scumbag. Never mind they hate the NYT, the truth will trump their paranoia of a liberal media and they'll just stay home rather than vote evil into office.
im sorry, but the fact that this story took 8 fucking years to come forward shows that the msm is broken
nobody knew about this relationship?
Lest we not forget the Keating Five of his storied past. Here is a chapter from Bill Muller of The Arizona Republic...what a nice stroll down memory lane!
By Bill Muller
The Arizona Republic
Oct. 03, 1999 12:12:00
As a war hero and U.S. senator, John McCain's life has been chronicled in pictures.
There are grainy mug shots of a young McCain, printed in U.S. newspapers after his jet was shot down over North Vietnam. There are black-and-white images of his return, grinning and waving, his hair turned prematurely gray by 5 1/2 years of malnutrition and torture in a Hanoi prison camp.
In happier times, there is McCain holding his newborn daughter while his wife, Cindy, smiles from her hospital bed.
But it is an innocent vacation picture that symbolizes McCain's Achilles heel and carries the reminder of the scandal that threatened his political career.
In the picture, which was taken in the Bahamas, McCain is seated on a bandstand while wearing an outrageous, straw party hat. Next to him on the dais, a bottle tipped to his lips, sits Charles Keating III, son of developer Charles H Keating Jr.
McCain calls the Keating scandal ''my asterisk.'' Over the years, his opponents have failed to turn it into a period.
It all started in March 1987. Charles H Keating Jr., the flamboyant developer and anti-porn crusader, needed help. The government was poised to seize Lincoln Savings and Loan, a freewheeling subsidiary of Keating's American Continental Corp.
As federal auditors crawled all over Lincoln, Keating was not content to wait and hope for the best. He'd spread a lot of money around Washington, and it was time to call in his chits.
One of his first stops was Sen. Dennis DeConcini. The Arizona lawmaker was one of Keating's most loyal friends in Congress, and for good reason. Keating had given thousands of dollars to DeConcini's campaigns. At one point, DeConcini even pushed Keating for ambassador to the Bahamas, where Keating owned a luxurious vacation home.
Now Keating had a job for DeConcini. He wanted him to organize a meeting with the regulators. The message: Get off Lincoln's back. Eventually, DeConcini would set up a meeting between five senators and the regulators. One of them was John McCain.
McCain knew Keating well. His ties to the home builder dated to 1981, when the two men met at a Navy League dinner where McCain was the speaker.
After the speech, Keating walked up to McCain and told him that he, too, was a Navy flier, and that he greatly respected McCain's war record. He met McCain's wife and family. The two men became friends.
Charlie Keating always took care of his friends, especially those in politics. John McCain was no exception.
In 1982, during McCain's first run for the House, Keating held a fund-raiser for him, collecting more than $11,000 from 40 employees of American Continental Corp. McCain would spend more than $550,000 to win the primary and the general election.
In 1983, during McCain's second House race, Keating hosted a $1,000-a-plate dinner for McCain, though he had no serious competition and coasted into his second term. When McCain pushed for the Senate in 1986, Keating was there with more than $50,000.
By 1987, McCain had received about $112,000 in political contributions from Keating and his associates.
McCain had also carried a little water for Keating in Washington. While in the House, McCain, along with a majority of representatives, co-sponsored a resolution to delay new regulations designed to curb risky investments by thrifts like Lincoln.
HESITANT PARTICIPANT
Despite his history with Keating, McCain was hesitant about intervening. At that point, he had been in the Senate only three months. DeConcini wanted McCain to fly to San Francisco with him and talk to the regulators. McCain refused.
Keating would not be dissuaded.
On March 24 at 9:30 a.m., Keating went to DeConcini's office and asked him if the meeting with the regulators was on. DeConcini told Keating that McCain was nervous.
''McCain's a wimp,'' Keating replied, according to the book Trust Me, by Michael Binstein and Charles Bowden. ''We'll go talk to him.''
Keating had other business on the Hill and did not reach McCain's office until 1:30. A DeConcini staffer had already told McCain about the wimp comment.
When he arrived, Keating presented McCain with a laundry list of demands for the regulators.
McCain told Keating that he would attend the meeting and find out whether Keating was getting treated fairly, but that was all.
''Keating gave me the clear impression that he expected me to do more,'' McCain said later. ''He had several specific requests.''
When Keating questioned his courage, McCain invoked his POW experience. He told Keating that he didn't spend 5 1/2 years in the Hanoi Hilton to be called a coward.
The two argued, then Keating stormed out.
Despite the dust-up, McCain attended not one but two meetings with the regulators. McCain later explained that he thought it was the right thing to do, because Keating was a constituent.
McCain would live to regret it.
The first meeting, on April 2 in DeConcini's office, included Ed Gray, chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, as well as four senators: DeConcini, McCain, Alan Cranston, D-Calif., and John Glenn, D-Ohio.
The meeting had a clandestine air. Gray came alone. None of the senators brought their aides. DeConcini asked Gray to withdraw a regulation in order to help Lincoln. Gray shook his head.
For Keating, the meeting was a bust. Gray told the senators that as head of the loan board, he worried about the big picture. He didn't have any specific information about Lincoln. Bank regulators in San Francisco would be versed in that, not him. Gray offered to set up a meeting between the senators and the San Francisco regulators.
The second meeting was on April 9. The same four senators attended, along with Sen. Don Riegle, D-Mich. Also at the meeting were William Black, then deputy director of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corp., James Cirona, president of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, and Michael Patriarca, director of agency functions at the FSLIC.
In a recent interview with The Republic, Black said the meeting was a show of force by Keating, who wanted the senators to pressure the regulators into dropping their case against Lincoln. The thrift was in trouble for violating ''direct investment'' rules, which prohibited S&Ls from taking large ownership positions in various ventures.
''The Senate is a really small club, like the cliche goes,'' Black said. ''And you really did have one-twentieth of the Senate in one room, called by one guy, who was the biggest crook in the S&L debacle.''
Black said the senators could have accomplished their goal ''if they had simply had us show up and see this incredible room and said, 'Hi. Charles Keating asked us to meet with you. 'Bye.' ''
'ALWAYS HAMLET'
The five senators, including McCain, seemed like a united front to Black.
''They presented themselves as a group,'' Black said, ''and DeConcini is the dad, who's going to take the primary speaking role. Both meetings are in his office, and in both cases it's 'we' want this, with no one going, 'What do you mean we, kemo sabe?' ''
According to nearly verbatim notes taken by Black, McCain started the second meeting with a careful comment.
''One of our jobs as elected officials is to help constituents in a proper fashion,'' McCain said. ''ACC (American Continental Corp.) is a big employer and important to the local economy. I wouldn't want any special favors for them. . . .
''I don't want any part of our conversation to be improper.''
Black said the comment had the opposite effect for the regulators. It made them nervous about what might really be going on.
''McCain was the weirdest,'' Black said. ''They were all different in their own way. McCain was always Hamlet . . . wringing his hands about what to do.''
Glenn, a former astronaut and the first American to orbit the Earth, was not as tactful.
''To be blunt, you should charge them or get off their backs,'' he told the regulators. ''If things are bad there, get to them. Their view is that they took a failing business and put it back on its feet. It's now viable and profitable. They took it off the endangered species list. Why has the exam dragged on and on and on?''
Added DeConcini, ''What's wrong with this if they're willing to clean up their act?''
Cirona, the banking official, told the senators that it was ''very unusual'' to hold a meeting to discuss a particular company.
DeConcini shot back: ''It's very unusual for us to have a company that could be put out of business by its regulators.''
The meeting went on. McCain was quiet, while DeConcini carried the ball. The regulators told the senators that Lincoln was in trouble. The thrift, Cirona said, was a ''ticking time bomb.''
Then Patriarca made a stunning comment, according to transcripts released later.
''We're sending a criminal referral to the Department of Justice,'' he said. ''Not maybe, we're sending one. This is an extraordinarily serious matter. It involves a whole range of imprudent actions. I can't tell you strongly enough how serious this is. This is not a profitable institution.''
The statement made DeConcini back off a little.
''The criminality surprises me,'' he said. ''We're not interested in discussing those issues. Our premise was that we had a viable institution concerned that it was being overregulated.''
''What can we say to Lincoln?'' Glenn asked.
''Nothing,'' Black responded, ''with regard to the criminal referral. They haven't, and won't be told by us that we're making one.''
''You haven't told them?'' Glenn asked.
''No,'' said Black. ''Justice would skin us alive if we did. Those referrals are very confidential. We can't prosecute anyone ourselves. All we can do is refer it to Justice.''
After the meeting, McCain was done with Keating.
''Again, I was troubled by the appearance of the meeting,'' McCain said later. ''I stated I didn't want any special favors from them. I only wanted them (Lincoln Savings) to be fairly treated.''
Black doesn't completely buy that argument. If McCain was concerned about Keating asking him to do things that were improper, why go to either meeting at all?
Black said McCain probably went because Keating was close to being the political godfather of Arizona and McCain still had plenty of ambition.
''Keating was incredibly powerful,'' Black said. ''And incredibly useful.''
McCain's reservations aside, Keating accomplished his goal. He had bought some time, though the price was very high.
SHORT-LIVED REPRIEVE
A month later, the San Francisco regulators finished a yearlong audit and recommended that Lincoln be seized. But the report was virtually ignored because of politics on the bank board.
Gray was being replaced as chairman by Danny Wall, who was more sympathetic to Keating.
The audit, which described Lincoln as a thrift reeling out of control, sat on a shelf.
In September 1987, the investigation was taken away from the San Francisco office, away from Black and Patriarca. In May 1988, it was transferred to Washington, where Lincoln would get a new audit.
It was a win for Keating. A battle, not the war.
In Phoenix, the move sparked a triumphant party at the posh headquarters of American Continental.
Someone hurled a computer from the second floor, shattering a window. Keating, all 6-feet-5 of him, struck a Superman pose and ripped open his shirt to display a hand-drawn skull and crossbones over the letters FHLBB - the Federal Home Loan Bank Board.
A secretary climbed onto a desk to take photos, and American Continental executive Robert Kielty joined her. Keating grabbed a roll of tape and lashed their legs together.
Potted plants were knocked over. Beer and champagne were spilled on the carved wood desks. Kielty took a bottle of champagne and poured it down another secretary's blouse.
''Get this champagne colder,'' Keating yelled.
Back in San Francisco, Black was fuming.
''Clearly, we were shot in the back,'' he would say later.
Despite the reprieve, Keating's businesses continued to spiral downward, taking the five senators with him. News of the meeting leaked out, and now all five men were answering some very embarrassing questions.
''Did you lean on regulators for Charlie Keating?''
''Did you get campaign contributions in exchange for your cooperation?''
''Why did you protect Keating?''
Together, the five senators had accepted more than $300,000 in contributions from Keating, and their critics added a new term to the American lexicon:
Keating Five.
As the S&L failure deepened, the sheer magnitude of the losses hit the press. Billions of dollars had been squandered. The Keating Five became shorthand for the kind of political influence that money can buy. The five senators were linked as the gang who went to bat for an S&L bandit.
S&L ''trading cards'' came out. The Keating Five card showed Charles Keating holding up his hand, with a senator's head adorning each finger. McCain was on Keating's pinkie.
As the Keating investigation dragged through 1988, McCain dodged the body blows. Most landed on DeConcini, who had arranged the meetings and had other close ties to Keating, including $50 million in loans from Keating to DeConcini's aides.
But McCain made a critical error.
In spinning his side of the Keating story, McCain adopted the blanket defense that Keating was a constituent and that he had every right to ask his senators for help. In attending the meetings, McCain said, he simply wanted to make sure that Keating was treated like any other constituent.
Keating was far more than a constituent to McCain, however.
On Oct. 8, 1989, The Republic revealed that McCain's wife and her father had invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center in April 1986, a year before McCain met with the regulators.
The paper also reported that the McCains, sometimes accompanied by their daughter and baby-sitter, had made at least nine trips at Keating's expense, sometimes aboard the American Continental jet. Three of trips were made during vacations to Keating's opulent Bahamas retreat at Cat Cay.
McCain also did not pay Keating for the trips until years after they were taken, when he learned that Keating was in trouble over Lincoln. Total cost: $13,433.
When the story broke, McCain did nothing to help himself. When reporters first called him, he was furious. Caught out in the open, the former fighter pilot let go with a barrage of cover fire. Sen. Hothead came out in all his glory.
''You're a liar,''' McCain snapped Sept. 29 when a Republic reporter asked him about business ties between his wife and Keating.
''That's the spouse's involvement, you idiot,'' McCain said later in the same conversation. ''You do understand English, don't you?''
He also belittled the reporters when they asked about his wife's ties to Keating.
''It's up to you to find that out, kids.''
And then he played the POW card.
''Even the Vietnamese didn't question my ethics,'' McCain said.
The paper ran the story a few days later. At a news conference, McCain was a changed man. He stood calmly for 90 minutes and answered every question.
On the shopping center, his defense was simple. The deal did not involve him. The shares in the shopping center had been purchased by a partnership set up between McCain's wife and her father.
But McCain also had to explain his trips with Keating and why he didn't pay Keating back right away.
On that score, McCain admitted he had fouled up. He said he should have reimbursed Keating immediately, not waited several years. His staff said it was an oversight, but it looked bad, McCain jetting around with Keating, then going to bat for him with the federal regulators.
Meanwhile, Lincoln continued to founder.
In April 1989, two years after the Keating Five meetings, the government seized Lincoln, which declared bankruptcy. In September 1990, Keating was booked into Los Angeles County Jail, charged with 42 counts of fraud. His bond was set at $5 million.
During Keating's eventual trial, the prosecution produced a parade of elderly investors who had lost their life's savings by investing in American Continental junk bonds.
'THE ULTIMATE SURVIVOR'
In November 1990, the Senate Ethics Committee convened to decide what punishment, if any, should be doled out to the Keating Five.
Robert Bennett, who would later represent President Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones case, was the special counsel for the committee. In his opening remarks, he slammed DeConcini but went lightly on McCain, the lone Republican ensnared with four Democrats.
''In the case of Senator McCain, there is very substantial evidence that he thought he had an understanding with Senator DeConcini's office that certain matters would not be gone into at the meeting with (bank board) Chairman (Ed) Gray,'' Bennett said.
''Moreover, there is substantial evidence that, as a result of Senator McCain's refusal to do certain things, he had a fallout with Mr. Keating.''
McCain, the ultimate survivor, had dodged another missile.
Among the Keating Five, McCain received the most direct contributions from Keating. But the investigation found that he was the least culpable, along with Glenn. McCain attended the meetings but did nothing afterward to stop Lincoln's death spiral.
Lincoln's losses eventually were set at $3.4 billion, the most expensive failure in the national S&L scandal.
McCain also looked good in contrast to DeConcini, who continued to defend Keating until fall 1989, when federal regulators filed a $1.1 billion civil racketeering and fraud suit against Keating, accusing him of siphoning Lincoln's deposits to his family and into political campaigns.
In the end, McCain received only a mild rebuke from the Ethics Committee for exercising ''poor judgment'' for intervening with the federal regulators on behalf of Keating. Still, he felt tarred by the affair.
''The appearance of it was wrong,'' McCain said recently. ''It's a wrong appearance when a group of senators appear in a meeting with a group of regulators, because it conveys the impression of undue and improper influence. And it was the wrong thing to do.''
McCain noted that Bennett, the independent counsel, recommended that McCain and Glenn be dropped from the investigation.
''For the first time in history, the Ethics Committee overruled the recommendation of the independent counsel,'' McCain said. ''I'm sure it had nothing to do with the fact that I was the only Republican of the five and the Democrats were in the majority (in the Senate).''
But McCain owns up to his mistake:
''I was judged eventually, after three years, of using, quote, poor judgment, and I agree with that assessment.''
Republican = BACKED BY STRONG LOBBYIST. sO WHATS NEW
Necadawg @ 34:
Spot on Nec.
18 years later and this dog still can't hunt!
This post is misleading once you watch the full video linked here: The poll was based on the original NYT story - if there's nothing more to it, will the allegations in it hurt McCain in November. Howard Fineman explains it well.
Shame on C&L for not providing context to this McCain poll. C&L should've criticized the panel and the poll question. There already IS more solid reasons to go after McCain's hypocrisy on lobbying than the Feb. 21 NYT story provided (check even more recent NYT, WaPost and Newsweek articles).
Filthy Harry @ 19:
BINGO.
They missed the major story of the 2006 elections. People are sick of the GOP culture of corruption. Dean is right to tie McTaint to this.
McMediadarling makes the McMatthewsmeater hard to understand their relationship in its true context.
lobbyists...hmm, isn't that republican congressman do after they retire instead of working at Walmart as a greeter?
John A. Please run a post on the links between John McCain and Alabama Gov. Bob Riley. This ties to the railroading of Don Seigelman. McCain needed some favors from Riley so he left him off the Ambramoff scandal. Riley's campain manager's wife was the District attorney who started the sweeping investigations into Seigelman but had to eventually recuse herself. She was appointed by Bush. Remember some other District attorney's who got fired for not opening this type of investigation back in the 2006 elections?? This story stinks to high heaven. I look forward to seeing what you guys have to say, I'm a big fan. Here's a link to my tiny blog about this story, hope it helps.
http://illiterateelectorate.blogspot.com/2008/02/updatebush-and-use-of-j...
John to Vicky, "Was it good fot you, my friend?"
Donald Zwier @ 41:
With McFistfuckamerica, every time's like the fist time.
Hittin' the road, Jack,"and I ain't comin' back no more no more no more no more"...
"Last word, freak." - Melvin Udall
out
Our media, and i know you'll all flip out, is pretty much right down the middle of the political spectrum. Sure for the most part they are incompetent, sensationalist, shallow bastards. But I'm so tired of hearing republicans claim the media has a liberal bias, and liberals claim a conservative bias.
That's a pretty good indication that there is neither. Before you disagree, remember that 2 sides fighting over ideologies is what this country was founded on.
living-abomination @ 44:
You don't even get it. It's a corporate owned media, meaning news isn't even what it's about. It's about mindless infotainment to draw viewers for advertisers. period. Fixed News is mainly propaganda with semi naked girls on the side for titillation and they really don't even disguise it. By the way, name a "news" channel on the left that's like FOX. You can't. There's no such thing.
And in all the time I've known him, I've never seen Captain Stern do anything immoral...
...except all those times he sold dope disguised as a nun!!
And never seen him do anything illegal...
...unless you coun't the preschoolers prostitution ring!!
He's always been the cream of human goodness...
...oh gimme a break...
He's nuthin' but a low down, double dealin', larcenest, perverted WORM!!
Stern... STERN!
[Deleted. Off topic-Sitemonitor]
another one bites the dust ! ,
next the huckster and take upchuck with ya , ok whos left ( in the right wing ? ) I forgot " da mutt " , whose bi-line is I flipped so many times I may as well be on a spit ! . And last ? .
With all the rest of McCain's negatives, the lobbyist revelations aren't necessary to sink him, but it's nice to have it out there.
My guess is that all the talk about lobbyist ties will help him. If normal working class Americans were actually making the choice in elections, it woudl hurt, but these messages are directed to the real decision makers; corporate lobbyists and the big-business/financial powere brokers who run Washington. to them, the idea that McCain is a friend to lobbyists and available at a price sounds like Manna from heaven. "John mcCain, President for sale, promises war for ever!" What fascist wouldn't love the sound of that?
Rachel Maddow had Issikoff on yesterday's radio show. She tried, more than once, to point out that it is McCain's history of the lobby deals, the $$$, the lying and breaking his grandiose legislation (campain finance). Issi does audible sighs, saying, yeah well everyone knows that what everyone does in DC. Excuuuuuuuuse me! Guess we should all just shut up then
The infiltration of lobbyists in McCain's campaign isn't the principal story. That's merely guilt by association. The real story is McCain's actual behavior on behalf of actual lobbyists and corporations, behavior which flies in the face of his self-stated independent, anti-lobbyist persona. There's plenty of evidence that McCain gets flown around by lobbyists and corporations, gets fundraisers thrown by them for him, and then, sometimes as soon as the very next day, he calls in special favors for those lobbyists and corporations.
Cafferty: Someone is lying. The New York Times dropped a bombshell on John McCain this morning with a front page story that could cost him the White House. It’s great reading: an improper relationship with a lobbyist, a woman named Vicki Iseman, his inner-circle convinced they were having an affair, all happening while he was Chair of the Senate Commerce Committee and she was representing telecom companies who had business before McCain’s committee. The two of them together at fundraisers, in his office, aboard private corporate jets … It got so bad that his closest friends and advisers finally stepped in to save McCain from himself.
From 1990 and the Keating 5 scandal we have, "But McCain owns up to his mistake:"
”I was judged eventually, after three years, of using, quote, poor judgment, and I agree with that assessment.”
He already has "poor judgement" on his resume now we can add "liar, ethically and morally bankrupt, abuser of power, etc). So, he learned nothing from his involvement with Chuckie K. and the boys 18 years ago; what makes anyone think he is anything better than a seller of snake oil??
Comments are closed on this entry