TOPICS

Condoleezza Rice: War Criminal

icon Download | play icon Download | play (h/t Heather)

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice testified about the proposed fiscal year 2009 budget for foreign operations. The topics included foreign aid, foreign services personnel, increasing energy prices, Russia, and the war in Afghanistan and Iraq.

However, it only took one sign behind her shoulder to get past all the spin.



Login or Register to post comments.

161 comments

Well the whole group of thugs would be hard to fit in one room jail cell...

Killer! Literally.

Awesome! That took guts. :)

Rice admitted in this videoclip that the Taliban is a terrorist organization. Then why are we funding their insurgency in Afghanistan with our tax dollars being supplied to Pakistan?
http://goodgirlroxie.blogspot.com/2008/03/remember-afghanistan.html

Testified? Does this mean she was under oath? Can we indict ANY of these criminals?

Have we ever had such an ineffectual SOS? Although, in her defense, maybe the problem is that she has President Godzilla as a boss. Guess, it's hard for anyone to shine under Bubble Boy, especially since he pretty much screws up everything he touches. Most bosses don't like their subordinates to look better than them, so obviously that sets the bar pretty darn low.

Every Reslug. in Dumbya's cabinet is a war criminal and should be tried for treason.

Good job sign man!

CNN is going to do a report about how so many members of the Bush administration qualify as war criminals.....

Just Kidding!

RIGHT ON MAN!!!

Nice find!!!

John McCain's enlarged prostate @ 8:

Good job sign man!

CNN is going to do a report about how so many members of the Bush administration qualify as war criminals.....

Just Kidding!

lol

She's not all bad -- she did adopt some African Orphans, to ship them to Iraq!

It's not just Condi. They should ALL be tried as war criminals-Bush, Cheney, Rice, and Rumsfeld in particular. Have I left out anyone, other than the neocon and Republican enablers. Of course, we just need to go for those at the top, since they had the decision making power.

OMG that's AWESOME!!! rofl

This was probably a CodePink person. Have to hand it to them. They go to all the Congressional hearings and try to get as much attention as they are allowed. They are well aware of where the C-Span cameras can pick them up and get them in the picture.

Why does she always look so pissed?

Good job with the signs. True. Very True.

Did you notice the camera man looking into his monitor and then laughing?

They only think she is a war criminal cuz she is black.

Oh wait, that is just as stupid as Ferraro's comment. Nevermind.

paddy boy @ 15:

Why does she always look so pissed?

The price of asexuality.

paddy boy @ 15:

Why does she always look so pissed?

You'd look pissed too if you were so eeeeeevil!

Spicegal @ 12:

It's not just Condi. They should ALL be tried as war criminals-Bush, Cheney, Rice, and Rumsfeld in particular. Have I left out anyone, other than the neocon and Republican enablers. Of course, we just need to go for those at the top, since they had the decision making power.

Here are a few more you left out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fd7qlGXt6vg

biff diggerence @ 18:

paddy boy @ 15:

Why does she always look so pissed?

The price of asexuality.

Goood one, lol!!! Better'n mine...ya bastage!

Paul @ 16:

Good job with the signs. True. Very True.

Did you notice the camera man looking into his monitor and then laughing?

Hehehehe, sweeeeet!

What's really sad about this is the dilution under which well meaning people who are against the activities of your government, that ANYONE will be tried for war crimes. Who's going to try them - the US Supreme Court? Maybe if the US hadn't pulled out of the World Court, and thumbed its nose at International Law there might have been some slim chance...

SassySandy @ 14:

This was probably a CodePink person. Have to hand it to them. They go to all the Congressional hearings and try to get as much attention as they are allowed. They are well aware of where the C-Span cameras can pick them up and get them in the picture.

Hard to forget the Code Pink moment when bloody hands were waved a ft. in front of Rice's face.

More of that, please. These shits are so deserving of public humiliation, & so much more...

There's a working title for Condi's bio circulating:

Dressing Up, Sucking Up, Fucking Up and Bailing Out:

The Role of Untethered Ambition in Academia, Corporate Life and the Private Sector

I can't even hear her voice anymore. All I think is "war criminal".

Hey Geraldine. Take a guess what Condi would be if she were white? Still a lying ass bitch!

Paul Giamatti playing John Adams? lol

Completely counter-productive. I assume it's Code-Pink. Seriously, fellas, come on, applauding this is applauding a tactic that will never get you where you want to be.

Condi's new title:
Fatuous Fibbing Female

(alternate)

The Role of Untethered Ambition in Academia, Corporate Life and "Public Service".

♣Bangkok Bob♣ @ 29:

Condi's new title:
Fatuous Fibbing Female

Or maybe
Fatuous Fabricating Female

Indeed she is.
It almost makes me wish that there really was a hell--for her and her fellow murderers in the Bush administration.

killthepoor @ 27:

Paul Giamatti playing John Adams? lol

Yeah I'm happy that C&L is getting ad revenue on the Internet, but that HBO thingy is more than a little intrusive.

And, as long as there's a Condi mention, I get to link to this again:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDlVB09F78k

HappySurge @ 28:

I'll accept any tactic that equates "war criminal" with any of this Administration's thugs.

Any color.

paddy boy @ 15:

Why does she always look so pissed?

Shoes must be pinching her cloven hooves.

Hey Condi what was the name of that intelligence memo again?

Andotech @ 25:

I can't even hear her voice anymore. All I think is "war criminal".

I can't even look at most of them anymore. The preznit makes me wretch.

Join the Resistance... www.codepink4peace.org

And still after all this time, no technogeek from the left has come up with a photoshopped edited 'nazi's in the docket' panarama view from Neuremberg with the heads of this corrupt admin fitted to the nazi's sitting there awaiting judgement... I'm tellin ya folks, that shit would sell like hotcakes at a bed and breakfast...
Hmmm maybe the problem is whose head to fit where... I could see that as a real head scratcher...Do ya photshop in fatass Karl or shotgun Dicks head onto Goerings body... hmmm decisions decision..... hmmmmm JD

Turn up the heat on Senator Jay Rockefeller of the intelligence committee. He is holding up the FISA bill from reaching the senate because it does not include telecom immunity. The American people voted to hold the Bush administration accountable and Rockefeller is a Bush dog democrat obstructing the will of the American people.

What they didn't show was the tazering that probably followed that disgusting display of truthiness

Closest thing to justice that thing or any other members of Bushies fascists will ever get is a protest sign behind them. Right f'ing sad.

It's the subtle forms of protest and insult that are always the best- this one is great. Major props to whoever did this. The camera operator's expression is the icing on the cake.
No need to bring a coat Condi- it will be plenty warm.

Send that guy some bail money, cause you know he's been arrested by now.

Unfortunately, all of us who label her and her filthy associates as "war criminals" come off looking like nut cases. Mainstream America turns a deaf ear and a blind eye to this stuff, partly the courtesy of corporate media.

How's it going in the rest of the world? Have any nations come out and declared anybody in this administration a "war criminal", and demanded trials/hearings? England? Canada? Mexico? Germany?

Any nation at all?

Screw Jon Stewart and Crew for making fun of the gals at CodePink. They may not be perfect, but there doing what they can for America, and that's a lot more than a lot of people are doing. Join Code Pink and show some support.

Themesong for the new John Adams movie

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xL_9zdu4iVw

FUCK Jay Rockefeller! Isn't it one of his damned fithy rich relatives who'se pining to see us all rchipped?? I'd rather chew my own arm off, then allow myself to be tracked like some freakin farm animal like that!!!... JD

TakeOurCountryBack @ 42:

What they didn't show was the tazering that probably followed that disgusting display of truthiness

mmmmaybe...if it DID happen, it will probably end up on the intar-web soon.

I'm so glad she got fired on The Apprentice last week.

Lollimom @ 46:

Unfortunately, all of us who label her and her filthy associates as "war criminals" come off looking like nut cases. Mainstream America turns a deaf ear and a blind eye to this stuff, partly the courtesy of corporate media.

How's it going in the rest of the world? Have any nations come out and declared anybody in this administration a "war criminal", and demanded trials/hearings? England? Canada? Mexico? Germany?

Any nation at all?

Why? US governments have done similar shit for decades. Americans either don't believe it, or don't give a shit as long as it isn't them. Sad reality.

what's omarosa doing there.. i thought she got fired last week.

Yellow Elephant Safari (Hussein) @ 36:

paddy boy @ 15:

Why does she always look so pissed?

Shoes must be pinching her cloven hooves.

The smell of her sulphur douche.

Blue Lensmadinejad @ 38:

Andotech @ 25:

I can't even hear her voice anymore. All I think is "war criminal".

I can't even look at most of them anymore. The preznit makes me wretch.

The preznit is a wretch that makes you retch.

paddy boy @ 15:

Why does she always look so pissed?

You'd look pissed too if you were so eeeeeevil!

On the way to testify, she had to fill up her SUV.

Lollimom @ 46:

Unfortunately, all of us who label her and her filthy associates as "war criminals" come off looking like nut cases. Mainstream America turns a deaf ear and a blind eye to this stuff, partly the courtesy of corporate media.

How's it going in the rest of the world? Have any nations come out and declared anybody in this administration a "war criminal", and demanded trials/hearings? England? Canada? Mexico? Germany?

Any nation at all?

Putin called us a rising fascist state....or somethin like that.

Hmmm. Let's see, the signs are pink the sleeve is pink. Hmmm, who could it be? Ahhh. Commie pinkos? Maybe. Uhhh. Does anyone know where Madea Benjamin was during this testimony?

ConcernedHusseinCanuck @ 52:

Lollimom @ 46:

Unfortunately, all of us who label her and her filthy associates as "war criminals" come off looking like nut cases. Mainstream America turns a deaf ear and a blind eye to this stuff, partly the courtesy of corporate media.

How's it going in the rest of the world? Have any nations come out and declared anybody in this administration a "war criminal", and demanded trials/hearings? England? Canada? Mexico? Germany?

Any nation at all?

Why? US governments have done similar shit for decades. Americans either don't believe it, or don't give a shit as long as it isn't them. Sad reality.

Why, you ask? That is an odd question.

You don't care about the slaughter of innocents abroad, so that oil companies may prosper?

Your nation doesn't care either?

I'm starting to ask the question: Why are other people in other countries so cowardly, so unabashedly detached from war crimes when they witness them?

I assure you, this isn't just a USA problem. The entire world is in this together, and everybody is acting like it's not their problem.

jack damage @ 49:

FUCK Jay Rockefeller! Isn't it one of his damned fithy rich relatives who'se pining to see us all rchipped?? I'd rather chew my own arm off, then allow myself to be tracked like some freakin farm animal like that!!!... JD

damn straight. If they make it illegal to be a free man in this country, I guess I'll just have to be illegal.

I would think that Condi (“Vegetable woman! Vegetable gentleman!”) tends to view human beings as lifeless objects in an indifferent, objective, often ambiguous, and absurd universe, in which meaning is not provided by the natural order, but rather can be created even from the sublimely paranoid and ridiculous, however with reservations and unstably, by human beings' actions and interpretations.

Her own silent joy is perverse although contained therein. Her fate belongs to herself, ultimately bashed, bruised, and ridiculed, but happy creating chaos, death, and destruction against all enemies and non-hackers of her repressed sexual power trip. And whilst all this is going on, she contemplates her imagined social torment and silences all the mamby-pamby naysayers and moon calves in the universe, and the myriad slight but wondering little voices of the earth rise up, unconscious, secret calls, invitations from all the faces, they are the necessary reverse and ironic price of her sick victory. There is no sun without shadow, and it is essential to know the night in order to avail one’s self of the nightlight of her un-reality in order to chase those cut-and-runner spooks away.

This absurd woman says yes and her efforts will henceforth be unceasing. If there is a personal fate, there is no higher destiny, or at least there is, but one which she concludes is both inevitable and despicable and perfect for her. For the rest, she knows herself to be the master of her days and a hell of a fashion shoe and accessory magnet. At that subtle moment when she glances backward over her shoulder at all her critics as she sets forth in her folly to ultimately plummet either to her soul death or even deeper depths of embarrassment, she returns toward the edge of the abyss, pivoting like a duck, she contemplates the series of unrelated actions which have become her fate, created by herself, combined under the cat's eyes of her cursed youth, and soon sealed by her death. Thus, convinced of the wholly human origin of all that is human, a blind fool eager to see who knows that the night has no end, she is still on the go.

Lollimom @ 59:

ConcernedHusseinCanuck @ 52:

Lollimom @ 46:

Unfortunately, all of us who label her and her filthy associates as "war criminals" come off looking like nut cases. Mainstream America turns a deaf ear and a blind eye to this stuff, partly the courtesy of corporate media.

How's it going in the rest of the world? Have any nations come out and declared anybody in this administration a "war criminal", and demanded trials/hearings? England? Canada? Mexico? Germany?

Any nation at all?

Why? US governments have done similar shit for decades. Americans either don't believe it, or don't give a shit as long as it isn't them. Sad reality.

Why, you ask? That is an odd question.

You don't care about the slaughter of innocents abroad, so that oil companies may prosper?

Your nation doesn't care either?

I'm starting to ask the question: Why are other people in other countries so cowardly, so unabashedly detached from war crimes when they witness them?

I assure you, this isn't just a USA problem. The entire world is in this together, and everybody is acting like it's not their problem.

The entire world cannot stop a foreign nation's government from doing anything, unless militarily though. US citizens let these pukes take over, then re-elected them to rub salt in the world's wounds. What you want us to do about it? Attack? With what, donuts?

Oh come on people, that Iraq War criminal thing is so yesterday. You people just need to see there are more important things to report on. This just in...Eliot Spitzer's prostitute is one smokin' brunette. [As to what she smokes, get your mind out of the gutter! heh heh]

jack damage @ 49:

FUCK Jay Rockefeller! Isn't it one of his damned fithy rich relatives who'se pining to see us all rchipped?? I'd rather chew my own arm off, then allow myself to be tracked like some freakin farm animal like that!!!... JD

Personally, I'd rather shoot the motherfucker in the face that tries to put a damn chip into me. That would start a revolution overnight if they try to force that shit on people.

Condi is without a doubt the most ineffective, overrated, useless secretary of state EVER.

r @ 65:

Condi is without a doubt the most ineffective, overrated, useless secretary of state EVER.

Henry Kissinger.

He's baaaaaaaaaaaack--Carl Gordon, I mean.

Puhleeze, CG, once was too much.

ConcernedHusseinCanuck @ 52:

Lollimom @ 46:

Unfortunately, all of us who label her and her filthy associates as "war criminals" come off looking like nut cases. Mainstream America turns a deaf ear and a blind eye to this stuff, partly the courtesy of corporate media.

How's it going in the rest of the world? Have any nations come out and declared anybody in this administration a "war criminal", and demanded trials/hearings? England? Canada? Mexico? Germany?

Any nation at all?

Why? US governments have done similar shit for decades. Americans either don't believe it, or don't give a shit as long as it isn't them. Sad reality.

Hi CC! It's called nationalism - one of the larger and more destructive 'isms' that extend out in concentric circles from their central 'ism', egoism, which is naturally exclusive and intertwined with a dualistic concept of existence which is unconsciously accepted as reality by those whose Darwinian wiring and/or exposure to/acceptance of other ways of seeing is limited/nil...IMHO

;-}

ConcernedHusseinCanuck @ 62:

The entire world cannot stop a foreign nation's government from doing anything, unless militarily though. US citizens let these pukes take over, then re-elected them to rub salt in the world's wounds. What you want us to do about it? Attack? With what, donuts?

That (bolded) is not true, not true at all.

There is something called economic sanctions, for one. If you see war crimes taking place, where is it written that you just sit back and say, well they elected them there's nothing we can do except throw donuts?

Face it: nobody really cares what crimes the USA commits, as long as their own corporate/economic interests aren't in jeopardy.

I'll stop responding to you because my questions were more rhetorical than anything else.

Carl Gordon @ 61:

I would think that Condi (“Vegetable woman! Vegetable gentleman!”) tends to view human beings as lifeless objects in an indifferent, objective, often ambiguous, and absurd universe, in which meaning is not provided by the natural order, but rather can be created even from the sublimely paranoid and ridiculous, however with reservations and unstably, by human beings' actions and interpretations.

Her own silent joy is perverse although contained therein. Her fate belongs to herself, ultimately bashed, bruised, and ridiculed, but happy creating chaos, death, and destruction against all enemies and non-hackers of her repressed sexual power trip. And whilst all this is going on, she contemplates her imagined social torment and silences all the mamby-pamby naysayers and moon calves in the universe, and the myriad slight but wondering little voices of the earth rise up, unconscious, secret calls, invitations from all the faces, they are the necessary reverse and ironic price of her sick victory. There is no sun without shadow, and it is essential to know the night in order to avail one’s self of the nightlight of her un-reality in order to chase those cut-and-runner spooks away.

This absurd woman says yes and her efforts will henceforth be unceasing. If there is a personal fate, there is no higher destiny, or at least there is, but one which she concludes is both inevitable and despicable and perfect for her. For the rest, she knows herself to be the master of her days and a hell of a fashion shoe and accessory magnet. At that subtle moment when she glances backward over her shoulder at all her critics as she sets forth in her folly to ultimately plummet either to her soul death or even deeper depths of embarrassment, she returns toward the edge of the abyss, pivoting like a duck, she contemplates the series of unrelated actions which have become her fate, created by herself, combined under the cat's eyes of her cursed youth, and soon sealed by her death. Thus, convinced of the wholly human origin of all that is human, a blind fool eager to see who knows that the night has no end, she is still on the go.

Read what you typed. Pure crap that doesn't make sense no matter how many times you read it.

kindanasty looks like she's wearing sandpaper tampons.

Proud2bHumble @ 68:

ConcernedHusseinCanuck @ 52:

Lollimom @ 46:

Unfortunately, all of us who label her and her filthy associates as "war criminals" come off looking like nut cases. Mainstream America turns a deaf ear and a blind eye to this stuff, partly the courtesy of corporate media.

How's it going in the rest of the world? Have any nations come out and declared anybody in this administration a "war criminal", and demanded trials/hearings? England? Canada? Mexico? Germany?

Any nation at all?

Why? US governments have done similar shit for decades. Americans either don't believe it, or don't give a shit as long as it isn't them. Sad reality.

Hi CC! It's called nationalism - one of the larger and more destructive 'isms' that extend out in concentric circles from their central 'ism', egoism, which is naturally exclusive and intertwined with a dualistic concept of existence which is unconsciously accepted as reality by those whose Darwinian wiring and/or exposure to/acceptance of other ways of seeing is limited/nil...IMHO

;-}

LOL! Patriotism, or nationalism?

ConcernedHusseinCanuck @ 70:

Carl Gordon @ 61:

I would think that Condi (“Vegetable woman! Vegetable gentleman!”) tends to view human beings as lifeless objects in an indifferent, objective, often ambiguous, and absurd universe, in which meaning is not provided by the natural order, but rather can be created even from the sublimely paranoid and ridiculous, however with reservations and unstably, by human beings' actions and interpretations.

Her own silent joy is perverse although contained therein. Her fate belongs to herself, ultimately bashed, bruised, and ridiculed, but happy creating chaos, death, and destruction against all enemies and non-hackers of her repressed sexual power trip. And whilst all this is going on, she contemplates her imagined social torment and silences all the mamby-pamby naysayers and moon calves in the universe, and the myriad slight but wondering little voices of the earth rise up, unconscious, secret calls, invitations from all the faces, they are the necessary reverse and ironic price of her sick victory. There is no sun without shadow, and it is essential to know the night in order to avail one’s self of the nightlight of her un-reality in order to chase those cut-and-runner spooks away.

This absurd woman says yes and her efforts will henceforth be unceasing. If there is a personal fate, there is no higher destiny, or at least there is, but one which she concludes is both inevitable and despicable and perfect for her. For the rest, she knows herself to be the master of her days and a hell of a fashion shoe and accessory magnet. At that subtle moment when she glances backward over her shoulder at all her critics as she sets forth in her folly to ultimately plummet either to her soul death or even deeper depths of embarrassment, she returns toward the edge of the abyss, pivoting like a duck, she contemplates the series of unrelated actions which have become her fate, created by herself, combined under the cat's eyes of her cursed youth, and soon sealed by her death. Thus, convinced of the wholly human origin of all that is human, a blind fool eager to see who knows that the night has no end, she is still on the go.

Read what you typed. Pure crap that doesn't make sense no matter how many times you read it.

No that's a good description of a nihilist/solipsist/Nietzcheist.

Kindasleeza.

Lollimom @ 69:

ConcernedHusseinCanuck @ 62:

The entire world cannot stop a foreign nation's government from doing anything, unless militarily though. US citizens let these pukes take over, then re-elected them to rub salt in the world's wounds. What you want us to do about it? Attack? With what, donuts?

That (bolded) is not true, not true at all.

There is something called economic sanctions, for one. If you see war crimes taking place, where is it written that you just sit back and say, well they elected them there's nothing we can do except throw donuts?

Face it: nobody really cares what crimes the USA commits, as long as their own corporate/economic interests aren't in jeopardy.

I'll stop responding to you because my questions were more rhetorical than anything else.

No I enjoy reading your posts. I'm not arguing that you are wrong, you are right. However, no nation would ever want sanctions against the US. It backfires. Take Canada. Why would we want sanctions against the US if it hurts us economically? There is no place where such things can take place, except the UN, and the US has ultimate veto power, and so it would be futile. There are only two ways the US government can be toppled. Economically (which seems to be taking place) or militarily.

Nietszheist.

No thats a guy who tries to impress you with his lame english lit degree.

ConcernedHusseinCanuck @ 70:

Carl Gordon @ 61:

I would think that Condi (“Vegetable woman! Vegetable gentleman!”) tends to view human beings as lifeless objects in an indifferent, objective, often ambiguous, and absurd universe, in which meaning is not provided by the natural order, but rather can be created even from the sublimely paranoid and ridiculous, however with reservations and unstably, by human beings' actions and interpretations.

Her own silent joy is perverse although contained therein. Her fate belongs to herself, ultimately bashed, bruised, and ridiculed, but happy creating chaos, death, and destruction against all enemies and non-hackers of her repressed sexual power trip. And whilst all this is going on, she contemplates her imagined social torment and silences all the mamby-pamby naysayers and moon calves in the universe, and the myriad slight but wondering little voices of the earth rise up, unconscious, secret calls, invitations from all the faces, they are the necessary reverse and ironic price of her sick victory. There is no sun without shadow, and it is essential to know the night in order to avail one’s self of the nightlight of her un-reality in order to chase those cut-and-runner spooks away.

This absurd woman says yes and her efforts will henceforth be unceasing. If there is a personal fate, there is no higher destiny, or at least there is, but one which she concludes is both inevitable and despicable and perfect for her. For the rest, she knows herself to be the master of her days and a hell of a fashion shoe and accessory magnet. At that subtle moment when she glances backward over her shoulder at all her critics as she sets forth in her folly to ultimately plummet either to her soul death or even deeper depths of embarrassment, she returns toward the edge of the abyss, pivoting like a duck, she contemplates the series of unrelated actions which have become her fate, created by herself, combined under the cat's eyes of her cursed youth, and soon sealed by her death. Thus, convinced of the wholly human origin of all that is human, a blind fool eager to see who knows that the night has no end, she is still on the go.

Read what you typed. Pure crap that doesn't make sense no matter how many times you read it.

My, such misdirected animosity! Sounds like you have either a fractured personality (statistically not very likely) or cognitive dissonance issues. Have you ever seen a shrink for that?

You know, hostility is generally considered a form of angry internal rejection or childish denial in psychology. In everyday speech it is more commonly used as a synonym for anger and aggression.

In psychological terms, hostility is the willful refusal to accept usually overwhelming evidence that one's perceptions or beliefs of the world are wrong and hopelessly delusional. Instead of the normal response of reconsidering, the hostile person attempts to force or coerce the world to fit their view, even if this is a forlorn pathetic hope, and however further harmful the cost to one’s self esteem or damaging social impressions one makes on other people.

Whilst testing theories against reality is a necessary part of life, and persistence in the face of failure is often a necessary part of invention or discovery, in the case of hostility there is the distinction that the evidence is not considered and a stubborn decision is made to try again despite the same outcome. Or instead the evidence is suppressed or denied, and deleted from awareness - the unfavorable evidence which might suggest a prior belief is flawed (or in laymen’s terms, is full of shit) and is instead ignored and willfully avoided. Psychologically, it can be said that reality is being held to ransom, and in this sense hostility is a pointless form of psychological extortion - an attempt to repeatedly try and force reality to produce the desired feedback, in order that your deluded preconceptions become validated.

In this sense, hostility is a response which forms part of discounting of unwanted cognitive dissonance, or to put it another way, in simple terms, it can be the filtering of information that factually conflicts with what one already believes, in an effort to ignore that information and reinforce one's stupid beliefs. In detailed terms, it is the perception of incompatibility between two cognitions, where "cognition" is defined as any element of knowledge, including attitude, emotion, belief, or behavior. The theory of cognitive dissonance states that contradicting cognitions serve as a driving force that compels the mind to acquire or invent (some would say, pullout of one’s ass) new thoughts or beliefs, or to modify existing beliefs, so as to reduce the amount of dissonance (conflict) between cognitions. Experiments have attempted to quantify this hypothetical drive. Some of these have examined how beliefs often change to match behavior when beliefs and behavior are in conflict.

For instance:

A person who clings to the same simple-minded world-view, even when the world view has essentially shown it doesn't work.

A person who refuses to do something (even if for their own benefit) because to do it would be accepting that something else they felt strongly about was wrong (or would benefit from moderation or compromise), that they could not face, and thus diminishing self worth even more.

A person who psychologically inside is being driven by a need to prove to their parents they were right, or successful, or deserved love, even knowing the matter will never be resolved as they wish, or that it will not make a difference, or that it is a pointless trail, or that their parents are dead or incapable of response.

Seriously, you need to check that.

ysbaddaden @ 76:

Nietszheist.

Gesundheit!

Carl Gordon @ 78:

ConcernedHusseinCanuck @ 70:

Carl Gordon @ 61:

I would think that Condi (“Vegetable woman! Vegetable gentleman!”) tends to view human beings as lifeless objects in an indifferent, objective, often ambiguous, and absurd universe, in which meaning is not provided by the natural order, but rather can be created even from the sublimely paranoid and ridiculous, however with reservations and unstably, by human beings' actions and interpretations.

Her own silent joy is perverse although contained therein. Her fate belongs to herself, ultimately bashed, bruised, and ridiculed, but happy creating chaos, death, and destruction against all enemies and non-hackers of her repressed sexual power trip. And whilst all this is going on, she contemplates her imagined social torment and silences all the mamby-pamby naysayers and moon calves in the universe, and the myriad slight but wondering little voices of the earth rise up, unconscious, secret calls, invitations from all the faces, they are the necessary reverse and ironic price of her sick victory. There is no sun without shadow, and it is essential to know the night in order to avail one’s self of the nightlight of her un-reality in order to chase those cut-and-runner spooks away.

This absurd woman says yes and her efforts will henceforth be unceasing. If there is a personal fate, there is no higher destiny, or at least there is, but one which she concludes is both inevitable and despicable and perfect for her. For the rest, she knows herself to be the master of her days and a hell of a fashion shoe and accessory magnet. At that subtle moment when she glances backward over her shoulder at all her critics as she sets forth in her folly to ultimately plummet either to her soul death or even deeper depths of embarrassment, she returns toward the edge of the abyss, pivoting like a duck, she contemplates the series of unrelated actions which have become her fate, created by herself, combined under the cat's eyes of her cursed youth, and soon sealed by her death. Thus, convinced of the wholly human origin of all that is human, a blind fool eager to see who knows that the night has no end, she is still on the go.

Read what you typed. Pure crap that doesn't make sense no matter how many times you read it.

My, such misdirected animosity! Sounds like you have either a fractured personality (statistically not very likely) or cognitive dissonance issues. Have you ever seen a shrink for that?

You know, hostility is generally considered a form of angry internal rejection or childish denial in psychology. In everyday speech it is more commonly used as a synonym for anger and aggression.

In psychological terms, hostility is the willful refusal to accept usually overwhelming evidence that one's perceptions or beliefs of the world are wrong and hopelessly delusional. Instead of the normal response of reconsidering, the hostile person attempts to force or coerce the world to fit their view, even if this is a forlorn pathetic hope, and however further harmful the cost to one’s self esteem or damaging social impressions one makes on other people.

Whilst testing theories against reality is a necessary part of life, and persistence in the face of failure is often a necessary part of invention or discovery, in the case of hostility there is the distinction that the evidence is not considered and a stubborn decision is made to try again despite the same outcome. Or instead the evidence is suppressed or denied, and deleted from awareness - the unfavorable evidence which might suggest a prior belief is flawed (or in laymen’s terms, is full of shit) and is instead ignored and willfully avoided. Psychologically, it can be said that reality is being held to ransom, and in this sense hostility is a pointless form of psychological extortion - an attempt to repeatedly try and force reality to produce the desired feedback, in order that your deluded preconceptions become validated.

In this sense, hostility is a response which forms part of discounting of unwanted cognitive dissonance, or to put it another way, in simple terms, it can be the filtering of information that factually conflicts with what one already believes, in an effort to ignore that information and reinforce one's stupid beliefs. In detailed terms, it is the perception of incompatibility between two cognitions, where "cognition" is defined as any element of knowledge, including attitude, emotion, belief, or behavior. The theory of cognitive dissonance states that contradicting cognitions serve as a driving force that compels the mind to acquire or invent (some would say, pullout of one’s ass) new thoughts or beliefs, or to modify existing beliefs, so as to reduce the amount of dissonance (conflict) between cognitions. Experiments have attempted to quantify this hypothetical drive. Some of these have examined how beliefs often change to match behavior when beliefs and behavior are in conflict.

For instance:

A person who clings to the same simple-minded world-view, even when the world view has essentially shown it doesn't work.

A person who refuses to do something (even if for their own benefit) because to do it would be accepting that something else they felt strongly about was wrong (or would benefit from moderation or compromise), that they could not face, and thus diminishing self worth even more.

A person who psychologically inside is being driven by a need to prove to their parents they were right, or successful, or deserved love, even knowing the matter will never be resolved as they wish, or that it will not make a difference, or that it is a pointless trail, or that their parents are dead or incapable of response.

Seriously, you need to check that.

*yawn*.......you are at the wrong website..you are looking for www.drphil.com down the road to your right.

♣Bangkok Bob♣ @ 32:

♣Bangkok Bob♣ @ 29:

Condi's new title:
Fatuous Fibbing Female

Or maybe
Fatuous Fabricating Female

How about Effed Up Effing Female?

paddy boy @ 15:

Why does she always look so pissed?

you would to if your hairdo was sprayed so stiff
or is that her little mind?

ConcernedHusseinCanuck @ 72:

Proud2bHumble @ 68:

ConcernedHusseinCanuck @ 52:

Lollimom @ 46:

Why? US governments have done similar shit for decades. Americans either don't believe it, or don't give a shit as long as it isn't them. Sad reality.

Hi CC! It's called nationalism - one of the larger and more destructive 'isms' that extend out in concentric circles from their central 'ism', egoism, which is naturally exclusive and intertwined with a dualistic concept of existence which is unconsciously accepted as reality by those whose Darwinian wiring and/or exposure to/acceptance of other ways of seeing is limited/nil...IMHO

;-}

LOL! Patriotism, or nationalism?

Both close cousins and variations on the egoism they spring from.

Carl Gordon @ 61:

I would think that Condi (“Vegetable woman! Vegetable gentleman!”) tends to view human beings as lifeless objects in an indifferent, objective, often ambiguous, and absurd universe, in which meaning is not provided by the natural order, but rather can be created even from the sublimely paranoid and ridiculous, however with reservations and unstably, by human beings' actions and interpretations.

Her own silent joy is perverse although contained therein. Her fate belongs to herself, ultimately bashed, bruised, and ridiculed, but happy creating chaos, death, and destruction against all enemies and non-hackers of her repressed sexual power trip. And whilst all this is going on, she contemplates her imagined social torment and silences all the mamby-pamby naysayers and moon calves in the universe, and the myriad slight but wondering little voices of the earth rise up, unconscious, secret calls, invitations from all the faces, they are the necessary reverse and ironic price of her sick victory. There is no sun without shadow, and it is essential to know the night in order to avail one’s self of the nightlight of her un-reality in order to chase those cut-and-runner spooks away.

This absurd woman says yes and her efforts will henceforth be unceasing. If there is a personal fate, there is no higher destiny, or at least there is, but one which she concludes is both inevitable and despicable and perfect for her. For the rest, she knows herself to be the master of her days and a hell of a fashion shoe and accessory magnet. At that subtle moment when she glances backward over her shoulder at all her critics as she sets forth in her folly to ultimately plummet either to her soul death or even deeper depths of embarrassment, she returns toward the edge of the abyss, pivoting like a duck, she contemplates the series of unrelated actions which have become her fate, created by herself, combined under the cat's eyes of her cursed youth, and soon sealed by her death. Thus, convinced of the wholly human origin of all that is human, a blind fool eager to see who knows that the night has no end, she is still on the go.

I'm guessing you're a big fan of Carlos Castenada.Now where is a Yaqui shaman interpreter when I need one.

Ollie @ 74:

Kindasleeza.

Don't get me started.

ysbaddaden @ 76:

Nietszheist.

gesundheit

ConcernedHusseinCanuck @ 80:

Carl Gordon @ 78:

ConcernedHusseinCanuck @ 70:

Carl Gordon @ 61:

Read what you typed. Pure crap that doesn't make sense no matter how many times you read it.

My, such misdirected animosity! Sounds like you have either a fractured personality (statistically not very likely) or cognitive dissonance issues. Have you ever seen a shrink for that?

You know, hostility is generally considered a form of angry internal rejection or childish denial in psychology. In everyday speech it is more commonly used as a synonym for anger and aggression.

In psychological terms, hostility is the willful refusal to accept usually overwhelming evidence that one's perceptions or beliefs of the world are wrong and hopelessly delusional. Instead of the normal response of reconsidering, the hostile person attempts to force or coerce the world to fit their view, even if this is a forlorn pathetic hope, and however further harmful the cost to one’s self esteem or damaging social impressions one makes on other people.

Whilst testing theories against reality is a necessary part of life, and persistence in the face of failure is often a necessary part of invention or discovery, in the case of hostility there is the distinction that the evidence is not considered and a stubborn decision is made to try again despite the same outcome. Or instead the evidence is suppressed or denied, and deleted from awareness - the unfavorable evidence which might suggest a prior belief is flawed (or in laymen’s terms, is full of shit) and is instead ignored and willfully avoided. Psychologically, it can be said that reality is being held to ransom, and in this sense hostility is a pointless form of psychological extortion - an attempt to repeatedly try and force reality to produce the desired feedback, in order that your deluded preconceptions become validated.

In this sense, hostility is a response which forms part of discounting of unwanted cognitive dissonance, or to put it another way, in simple terms, it can be the filtering of information that factually conflicts with what one already believes, in an effort to ignore that information and reinforce one's stupid beliefs. In detailed terms, it is the perception of incompatibility between two cognitions, where "cognition" is defined as any element of knowledge, including attitude, emotion, belief, or behavior. The theory of cognitive dissonance states that contradicting cognitions serve as a driving force that compels the mind to acquire or invent (some would say, pullout of one’s ass) new thoughts or beliefs, or to modify existing beliefs, so as to reduce the amount of dissonance (conflict) between cognitions. Experiments have attempted to quantify this hypothetical drive. Some of these have examined how beliefs often change to match behavior when beliefs and behavior are in conflict.

For instance:

A person who clings to the same simple-minded world-view, even when the world view has essentially shown it doesn't work.

A person who refuses to do something (even if for their own benefit) because to do it would be accepting that something else they felt strongly about was wrong (or would benefit from moderation or compromise), that they could not face, and thus diminishing self worth even more.

A person who psychologically inside is being driven by a need to prove to their parents they were right, or successful, or deserved love, even knowing the matter will never be resolved as they wish, or that it will not make a difference, or that it is a pointless trail, or that their parents are dead or incapable of response.

Seriously, you need to check that.

*yawn*.......you are at the wrong website..you are looking for www.drphil.com down the road to your right.

LOL! Your bad, today CC...;-}

Gotta give him credit for some fast fuckin typing and thorough specialized knowledge, tho. I think we've all been frustrated out of our minds by how retarded things have been for so long, when our potential for greatness as a species is so obvious...

I'd think that a cucumber and a bag of sand might straighten her out.

Peter G @ 83:

Carl Gordon @ 61:

I would think that Condi (“Vegetable woman! Vegetable gentleman!”) tends to view human beings as lifeless objects in an indifferent, objective, often ambiguous, and absurd universe, in which meaning is not provided by the natural order, but rather can be created even from the sublimely paranoid and ridiculous, however with reservations and unstably, by human beings' actions and interpretations.

Her own silent joy is perverse although contained therein. Her fate belongs to herself, ultimately bashed, bruised, and ridiculed, but happy creating chaos, death, and destruction against all enemies and non-hackers of her repressed sexual power trip. And whilst all this is going on, she contemplates her imagined social torment and silences all the mamby-pamby naysayers and moon calves in the universe, and the myriad slight but wondering little voices of the earth rise up, unconscious, secret calls, invitations from all the faces, they are the necessary reverse and ironic price of her sick victory. There is no sun without shadow, and it is essential to know the night in order to avail one’s self of the nightlight of her un-reality in order to chase those cut-and-runner spooks away.

This absurd woman says yes and her efforts will henceforth be unceasing. If there is a personal fate, there is no higher destiny, or at least there is, but one which she concludes is both inevitable and despicable and perfect for her. For the rest, she knows herself to be the master of her days and a hell of a fashion shoe and accessory magnet. At that subtle moment when she glances backward over her shoulder at all her critics as she sets forth in her folly to ultimately plummet either to her soul death or even deeper depths of embarrassment, she returns toward the edge of the abyss, pivoting like a duck, she contemplates the series of unrelated actions which have become her fate, created by herself, combined under the cat's eyes of her cursed youth, and soon sealed by her death. Thus, convinced of the wholly human origin of all that is human, a blind fool eager to see who knows that the night has no end, she is still on the go.

I'm guessing you're a big fan of Carlos Castenada.Now where is a Yaqui shaman interpreter when I need one.

'Powerful' Peyote philosophy, there, lol.

lucid fiction @ 87:

I'd think that a cucumber and a bag of sand might straighten her out.

I'm sure she's had plenty of Sandy's cucumbers already.

right on! @ 81:

♣Bangkok Bob♣ @ 32:

♣Bangkok Bob♣ @ 29:

Condi's new title:
Fatuous Fibbing Female

Or maybe
Fatuous Fabricating Female

How about Effed Up Effing Female?

Flatulent Fornicating Female?

Medal of Freedom for Code Pink!

Proud2bHumble @ 85:

ysbaddaden @ 76:

Nietszheist.

gesundheit

Nietszchieist

What is it about that man's name that drives me coo-coo bananas?

paddy boy @ 15:

Why does she always look so pissed?

Like Worf. Without the honor.

ysbaddaden @ 90:

right on! @ 81:

♣Bangkok Bob♣ @ 32:

♣Bangkok Bob♣ @ 29:
Or maybe
Fatuous Fabricating Female

How about Effed Up Effing Female?

Flatulent Fornicating Female?

Ain't startin no 'f'in list about this, so don't even try, lol. Tempters.

ysbaddaden @ 90:

right on! @ 81:

♣Bangkok Bob♣ @ 32:

♣Bangkok Bob♣ @ 29:
Or maybe
Fatuous Fabricating Female

How about Effed Up Effing Female?

Flatulent Fornicating Female?

Festering freak-a-ling fallatio-no?

She's a horrible, dishonest individual. She's never really received the heat she deserves. What's scary is she's one of the key voices of reason in the administration, and one of the few that (if some accounts are to be believed) has counseled against attacking Iran. But yes, the lot of them are war criminals.

ysbaddaden @ 92:

Proud2bHumble @ 85:

ysbaddaden @ 76:

Nietszheist.

gesundheit

Nietszchieist

What is it about that man's name that drives me coo-coo bananas?

Could be a subconscious connection with Icarus you're Jung up on.

lets trade us greenbacks for opium , we wont get much though .

ConcernedHusseinCanuck @ 70:

Carl Gordon @ 61:

I would think that Condi (“Vegetable woman! Vegetable gentleman!”) tends to view human beings as lifeless objects in an indifferent, objective, often ambiguous, and absurd universe, in which meaning is not provided by the natural order, but rather can be created even from the sublimely paranoid and ridiculous, however with reservations and unstably, by human beings' actions and interpretations.

Her own silent joy is perverse although contained therein. Her fate belongs to herself, ultimately bashed, bruised, and ridiculed, but happy creating chaos, death, and destruction against all enemies and non-hackers of her repressed sexual power trip. And whilst all this is going on, she contemplates her imagined social torment and silences all the mamby-pamby naysayers and moon calves in the universe, and the myriad slight but wondering little voices of the earth rise up, unconscious, secret calls, invitations from all the faces, they are the necessary reverse and ironic price of her sick victory. There is no sun without shadow, and it is essential to know the night in order to avail one’s self of the nightlight of her un-reality in order to chase those cut-and-runner spooks away.

This absurd woman says yes and her efforts will henceforth be unceasing. If there is a personal fate, there is no higher destiny, or at least there is, but one which she concludes is both inevitable and despicable and perfect for her. For the rest, she knows herself to be the master of her days and a hell of a fashion shoe and accessory magnet. At that subtle moment when she glances backward over her shoulder at all her critics as she sets forth in her folly to ultimately plummet either to her soul death or even deeper depths of embarrassment, she returns toward the edge of the abyss, pivoting like a duck, she contemplates the series of unrelated actions which have become her fate, created by herself, combined under the cat's eyes of her cursed youth, and soon sealed by her death. Thus, convinced of the wholly human origin of all that is human, a blind fool eager to see who knows that the night has no end, she is still on the go.

Read what you typed. Pure crap that doesn't make sense no matter how many times you read it.

It made sense to me. Then again, I'm one of the few Americans unafraid to admit the serious moral depravity of our country and the people who rule it. I feel no guilt for I had no hand in creating it.

Why does she always look so pissed?

Yeah According to Ferraro being black means she has nothing to frown about!
Late,
QSE#@

How do you think what Code Pink did or does accomplishes anything? It's childish and I don't suspect any normal thinking person left or right finds any merit in it. Really people.

David N @ 98:

lets trade us greenbacks for opium , we wont get much though .

Slave trading is wrong on every level, even if they're moldy illegals.

;-}

Nailed it.... The signs were true, not only with regards to condosleeza, but also with regards to most of the bush/cheney administration.

Go Code Pink!!

Masala @ 101:

How do you think what Code Pink did or does accomplishes anything? It's childish and I don't suspect any normal thinking person left or right finds any merit in it. Really people.

oxymoron says 'what'?

right on! @ 81:

♣Bangkok Bob♣ @ 32:

♣Bangkok Bob♣ @ 29:

Condi's new title:
Fatuous Fibbing Female

Or maybe
Fatuous Fabricating Female

How about Effed Up Effing Female?

How about Uber Beyotch?!

Proud2bHumble @ 104:

Masala @ 101:

How do you think what Code Pink did or does accomplishes anything? It's childish and I don't suspect any normal thinking person left or right finds any merit in it. Really people.

oxymoron says 'what'?

That about what I expected from you. Please inform us when you have progressed from puberty.

Masala @ 106:

Proud2bHumble @ 104:

Masala @ 101:

How do you think what Code Pink did or does accomplishes anything? It's childish and I don't suspect any normal thinking person left or right finds any merit in it. Really people.

oxymoron says 'what'?

That about what I expected from you. Please inform us when you have progressed from puberty.

Please stop fantasizing about prepubescent children on this site...

Looks very Code Pink, and right on the money. I gotta send them an e-mail of support. I love their tenacity.

to Masala [at]101

The problem is you bolded "normal thinking", which means, of course, your thinking. Open your mind to other opinions and ideas. Push yourself away from the table and say, "No more Koolaid Mom." Mkay? Try it.

Only in America could a cross-dressing black man get to become the first black female Sec. of State...

Go effing figure.

fwacbar @ 110:

Only in America could a cross-dressing black man get to become the first black female Sec. of State...

Go effing figure.

LOL

[1 fastfeat Says]: Well the whole group of thugs would be hard to fit in one room jail cell…

Luckily (or not, but in this instance) Halliburton built a whole string of concentration camps, in a $386-million-dollar no-bid contract. These criminals might fit in those. MIGHT.

Masala @ 101:

How do you think what Code Pink did or does accomplishes anything? It's childish and I don't suspect any normal thinking person left or right finds any merit in it. Really people.

Masala...when the media is so blatantly corporate, and the corporations own the administration. There's not many options left to those who would stand against such tyranny.
So unless you've got a bright idea, kindly keep your "normal thinking" to yourself. Thanks!

buhbyeee marshmellowmovies, til we meet again...

Hittin’ the road, Jack,”and I ain’t comin’ back no more no more no more no more”…

“Last word, freak.” - Melvin Udall

out

;-}

she is SO BAD at reconstructing the lies she's briefed in. it's especially bad when she attempts to use polysyllables.

Remember when the reichwing were pushing kindanasty as a possible vice-presidential or presidential candidate?

Proud2bHumble @ 97:

ysbaddaden @ 92:

Proud2bHumble @ 85:

ysbaddaden @ 76:

gesundheit

Nietszchieist

What is it about that man's name that drives me coo-coo bananas?

Could be a subconscious connection with Icarus you're Jung up on.

The unconscious archetype of reaching too far, and being brought so low.

Sounds like a good new mantra for booshco.

Masala @ 101:

How do you think what Code Pink did or does accomplishes anything? It's childish and I don't suspect any normal thinking person left or right finds any merit in it. Really people.

There is a core of truth in your statement. It is the words "I don't suspect"

Anti-war protesters chant "war criminal" at Rice 12 Mar 2008 16:53:57 GMT
Source: Reuters
WASHINGTON, March 12 (Reuters) - Chanting "war criminal," anti-war protesters waved blood-colored hands at U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Wednesday, but police held them back as she left a Capitol Hill hearing room.

Earlier, Republicans had complained about the distraction from the group as they held up signs saying "Condi Kills Kids" during the hearing on the State Department budget.

But the chairman of the House of Representatives committee, a New York Democrat, declined to eject the protesters.

"We're here in the United States of America. And as long as they don't disrupt this proceeding and as long as they're silent, they will be welcome," said Rep. Nita Lowey, who runs the subcommittee overseeing State Department appropriations.

"But they may not stand and they may not disrupt the proceedings."

The demonstrators, between 15 and 20 members of the Code Pink organization often seen at congressional hearings on Iraq, included one woman who was arrested last autumn for waving blood-colored hands in Rice's face.

The protesters wore pink T-shirts splattered with red, as well as pink scarves and pink artificial flowers braided into their hair. There were occasional outbursts from the group.

"Thank God," one protester said when Rice, an architect of President George W. Bush's Iraq policy, said it was her last appearance to testify on the budget.

Rice ignored the protesters. Several plainclothes police officers and uniformed Capitol Hill police watched them warily.

"I am embarrassed for the entire committee," said Rep. Jerry Lewis, a California Republican.

"I hope we never do this to the likes of you again," he told Rice.

I love it!

Masala @ 101:

How do you think what Code Pink did or does accomplishes anything? It's childish and I don't suspect any normal thinking person left or right finds any merit in it. Really people.

I'm sure you'd walk calmly into the gas chambers.... certainly you would not want to be outraged! that would be childish.

kindanasty looks like she's having one of those nasty cat-fights on America's Top Model,

Too bad she's do fugly.

D'oh! I meant to say so.

Carl Gordon @ 61:

Your words remind me of the Nuremberg Trials, in which a particular German high official claimed that he did nothing wrong because he had not personally killed anyone. He was only doing his job. He felt insulated from the death by the fact that he only processed the death warrants and appeals; processing which he did quite efficiently which led to the deaths of countless thousands. But he was only doing his job.

Condi reminds me of that person, who attempts to remain clinically pure ,untouched by the carnage resulting from her actions and inactions.

CoIntelPro - against Divisive Democrats @ 120:

Masala @ 101:

How do you think what Code Pink did or does accomplishes anything? It's childish and I don't suspect any normal thinking person left or right finds any merit in it. Really people.

I'm sure you'd walk calmly into the gas chambers.... certainly you would not want to be outraged! that would be childish.

Yes and I would just stand there while the Unterscharführer walked up and down the ranks saying,

"tell him about the chicken"

and by the way, when was the last time someone in this count was sent to the gas chambers. Please, your analogy is pathetic.

ysbaddaden @ 116:

Remember when the reichwing were pushing kindanasty as a possible vice-presidential or presidential candidate?

They'll do it if Obama is the preznitial candidate. They'll need some color on the ticket since Obama get everything handed to him because he's black. As we know, in America, if they can find a black person in your gene pool, you can't clean it out.

Masala @ 124:

CoIntelPro - against Divisive Democrats @ 120:

Masala @ 101:

How do you think what Code Pink did or does accomplishes anything? It's childish and I don't suspect any normal thinking person left or right finds any merit in it. Really people.

I'm sure you'd walk calmly into the gas chambers.... certainly you would not want to be outraged! that would be childish.

Yes and I would just stand there while the Unterscharführer walked up and down the ranks saying,

"tell him about the chicken"

and by the way, when was the last time someone in this count was sent to the gas chambers. Please, your analogy is pathetic.

so's your #101

Heil mein Fraufuhrer!

masala
and by the way, when was the last time someone in this count was sent to the gas chambers

1999.

Oh, and I assume you meant country. Not c*nt. As far as how many times someone in Condi's c*nt was sent to the chambers, I don't know.

paddy boy @ 15:

Why does she always look so pissed?

ysbaddaden @ 71:

kindanasty looks like she's wearing sandpaper tampons.

---------

Both Condi & Michelle Malkin have that sourpuss look all the time.

My thought has always been that they gargle with battery acid to wash their mouths out after performing at neo-con Bukkake parties.

Ayn Coulter is always smiling because she is a pitcher rather than a catcher.

Why does she always look so pissed?

You'd look pissed too if you realized you were stuck working for the dumbest man alive. She's been too supportive to turn tail now! So she has to sit there looking like a stressed out sour puss! Poor thing!

"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."

-- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials

full clip:
rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/iraq/iraq031308_rice.rm

I wonder if anybody else has difficulty finding the full-length version of posted cspan clips.

fastfeat @ 1:

Well the whole group of thugs would be hard to fit in one room jail cell...

one jail house

jack damage @ 40:

And still after all this time, no technogeek from the left has come up with a photoshopped edited 'nazi's in the docket' panarama view from Neuremberg with the heads of this corrupt admin fitted to the nazi's sitting there awaiting judgement... I'm tellin ya folks, that shit would sell like hotcakes at a bed and breakfast...
Hmmm maybe the problem is whose head to fit where... I could see that as a real head scratcher...Do ya photshop in fatass Karl or shotgun Dicks head onto Goerings body... hmmm decisions decision..... hmmmmm JD

That sounds like a project I'd like to tackle.

Like I said - a while back - if the US were still a part of the International Community, there might be a chance for War Crimes hearings. Otherwise - you're pissing up a rope.

Irk, I can't look at her.

[You earned your spot on that list after ignoring repeated requests to move on last week on a thread. If you'd like to be removed from the list, you need to respect the rules we ask EVERY poster to follow-Sitemonitor]

Paul@134;

Have at it bro... You'll make money on it for sure.. If we all don't end up in Gitmo first... Hell, I'll buy the first one I see...
That kind of art would be what I call 'truth in advertising'...JD

That's beautiful. Probably CODE PINK (?) from the color and how active they've been.

Just great, truth coming through her bullshit lies. On to the International War Crime Court for her. And her "husband".

SassySandy @ 14:

This was probably a CodePink person. Have to hand it to them. They go to all the Congressional hearings and try to get as much attention as they are allowed. They are well aware of where the C-Span cameras can pick them up and get them in the picture.

Well, sure because the only people that stand up for common sense justice are wackos with an agenda...right? No one who is truly human and bestowed with critical thinking would ever consider rocking the bush boat..sheesh! Pull your head out of the stupid fog game you are loving, and kick start your faculties! WE have to bring them to justice because they never ever will stop the status quo gravy train...

"Oh Condi, Condi. . .people say your cold, but I think your HOT!!!!!"

--Steve Earle

hey don't turn this site into a fucking commercialized annoyance with gigantic banner ads dude..how much are they paying you for it??

p.s. yes condi's a piece of shit

Why has no one picked on the fact that this photo/footage has obviously been DARKENED?!!! It doesn't matter who wrote the sign, what matters is that we blame Hillary for how Condi's skin looks in this photo!!!

Qusan @ 131:

Why does she always look so pissed?

You'd look pissed too if you realized you were stuck working for the dumbest man alive. She's been too supportive to turn tail now! So she has to sit there looking like a stressed out sour puss! Poor thing!

LOL. It amazes me how people actually maintain notions like this, or that "Bush is so stupid!" Let's just call it what it is. They're all just evil, reptilian, greedy Neo-Cons who see lying only as a challenge, not a matter of moral depravity.

bs @ 143:

hey don't turn this site into a fucking commercialized annoyance with gigantic banner ads dude..how much are they paying you for it??

p.s. yes condi's a piece of shit

Love the ads!! Make some $$, get on TV, get the word out, contribute to Blue Dogs, pay the awsome staff that runs the site and posts threads, live a little better yerself! Good for you, JA!!!

And c*nti's a piece of shit. *u

Thanks C&L, this made my day. I'll be haunting DC next week, I can't wait to see this kind of shit in person! Hey Condi, wanna be McBush's Veep? You two are sure to beat Hillary (the pig) in a nude mud wrestling mishap. Of course, Hillary has more experience in mud but you more than make up for it with your experience in huge piles of bullshit!

I was at that hearing to see if the World Wlidlife Funds would be addressed (they weren't) and met several of the Code Pink people shown here. While I definitely agree with most of their message, their tactics got a little out of hand; they tried to recruit basically everyone who passed (including myself), interrupted the hearings after being told several times that due to the importance of the hearing they could only protest in silence, and got the red paint they put on their hands all over the floor. Yes, this war needs to end now - but is there a slightly less obnoxious way of saying that?

Take her and all of the losers to jail

.

... Well, she is ...

.

161 comments

Login or Register to post comments.