TOPICS

Campaign for Our Future's Rick Perlstein (and author of the soon-to-be* published Nixonland) went head to talking head with Bush speechwriter and neo-con David Frum for the latest edition of BloggingheadsTV. The entire discussion is about 45 minutes in length, but this excerpt is instructive to the whole. Frum authoritatively starts asserting his opinions as facts about how Lyndon Johnson could have saved the Democratic party in the late 1960s "if there had been a police response that sent the message, 'this is not going to be tolerated, no more riots..."

But Frum's mistake is assuming that Perlstein doesn't have the actual facts on hand. How many stammers and concessions do you hear Frum make?

* corrected.  Nixonland will be available on May 13th.

Related Reactions

Advertise Here

Login or Register to post comments.

32 comments

What he's actually saying is... liberals deal in facts, conservatives deal in self-serving, aggrandizing politics. Nuff said.

These guys know the importance of language.

Frum's mistakes are many, but the chief one is that he's a hack, and not a very smart one. He doesn't know the facts, and doesn't care, but Perlstein really, really knows his stuff, especially on this one.

Frum writes the words "axil of evil" into a damn Bush speech and he becomes a celebrity. Enough already with this p.o.s., he should be one of the many who will be put on trial along with Bush and Cheney at the Hague.

See, you don't understand. Frum had already decided how the story went, and didn't have any interest in these silly "facts."

Like most conservatives, he doesn't give a shit about reality, and is only interested in his own self-centered perception of what happened.

Yet another example of why you don't bring a knife to a gun fight.

Tom (Not Tom) @ 6:

Yet another example of why you don't bring a knife to a gun fight.

A rubber knife, no less.

Thick-lipped David Frum comes in handy. I can point to him when my Canadian buddies start climbing their moral high horse.

Pearlstein looks like a real problem. I now understand why Dems in the House don't 'get it' if they are listening to this guy.

NOBODY I TALK TO IS IN FAVOR OF ANYTHING OTHER THAT SINGLE-PAYER, NOT-FOR-PROFIT.

Of course the folks I talk to are just the grassroots activists and citizens who show up a DFA, Drinking Liberally, Wellstone Club.....

You know the people that put Pombo down like the rabid dog he was.

Nobody important compared to Barry the Ignorant or Bill Richardson or Carville or the rest of the scum who've been gutting the party of FDR for the last 40 years.

Frum, Kristol, and Rove. Now there's an axis of evil !

Why is David Frum's Canadian ethnicity NOT part of a counter-argument that his ideas represent a form of foreign intervention? (The mother was Barbara Frum, a CBC Radio journalist.)

Che Guevara IV @ 11:

Why is David Frum's Canadian ethnicity NOT part of a counter-argument that his ideas represent a form of foreign intervention? (The mother was Barbara Frum, a CBC Radio journalist.)

Same reason we don't rip Canadians a new asshole when they show up HERE to tell us how great they are and how much we suck.

We are a tolerant and civil people.

Given to extended dialogues avoiding nasty references to each other's flaws.

Right?

Right?

Ah, the joys of the Socratic Dialogue...right Senator Obama...right Senator Clinton....

Yep, it's wunnerful.

This utter, blind faith that the conservative weenies have in brutality is ridiculous. They're still children, nerdy losers fearing-but-admiring the scary, tough kid at school who fought on the playground every day. Their thought behind every political failure is roughly: "well, the mistake was that we weren't brutal enough." That's why they are constantly defending torture--it's the ultimate show of badassery. All conflicts are won by willpower, and willpower is the willingness to be brutal, and if we're willing to torture people, we're total badasses and are obviously going to win. It's magic thinking.

And its so stupid. By this logic, we should have lost the Cold War. Trust me, the Russians were brutal as hell. The Nazis? Pretty damn brutal, as were the Japanese. Really, by this logic we should have lost the Revolutionary war--the Brits were much more willing than the Americans to mistreat prisoners. Heck, the Congress prevented Washington from burning down New York as he retreated! Not very badass.

These morons are too dumb to understand how you achieve a lasting peace, and they think that winning conflicts is simply the willingness to do something your opponent won't. It's being willing to do whatever it takes. They still don't understand that winning is the ability to do what it takes. And frankly, this childishness is so self-serving. Sending others off to be sons of bitches might satisfy their emotional desire to feel safe by being a badass, but it's not the same thing as winning. Not by a longshot.

anonymous @ 13:

This utter, blind faith that the conservative weenies have in brutality is ridiculous. They're still children, nerdy losers fearing-but-admiring the scary, tough kid at school who fought on the playground every day. Their thought behind every political failure is roughly: "well, the mistake was that we weren't brutal enough." That's why they are constantly defending torture--it's the ultimate show of badassery. All conflicts are won by willpower, and willpower is the willingness to be brutal, and if we're willing to torture people, we're total badasses and are obviously going to win. It's magic thinking.

And its so stupid. By this logic, we should have lost the Cold War. Trust me, the Russians were brutal as hell. The Nazis? Pretty damn brutal, as were the Japanese. Really, by this
logic we should have lost the Revolutionary war--the Brits were much more willing than the Americans to mistreat prisoners. Heck, the Congress prevented Washington from burning down New York as he retreated! Not very badass.

These morons are too dumb to understand how you achieve a lasting peace, and they think that winning conflicts is simply the willingness to do something your opponent won't. It's being willing to do whatever it takes. They still don't understand that winning is the ability to do what it takes. And frankly, this childishness is so self-serving. Sending others off to be sons of bitches might satisfy their emotional desire to feel safe by being a badass, but it's not the same thing as winning. Not by a longshot.

Precisely.

If you only watch one thing on the net this week, this should be it.

My favorite point was towards the end when, after listening to a long winded conservative rant, Perlstein said, "Could you rephrase that into a question?" OWNED!

Otherwise known as "facts don't do what you might want them to".

In the words of Ben Mulroney, son of former Canadian Prime Minister Brian: "And if you think I'm a disappointment to my parents, wait until you see David Frum."

(Well, actually, Ben didn't say that, It was a comedian playing the role of Ben Mulroney.)

Canada apologizes for David Frum...but you can keep him.

slippy hussein toad @ 5:

See, you don't understand. Frum had already decided how the story went, and didn't have any interest in these silly "facts."

Like most conservatives, he doesn't give a shit about reality, and is only interested in his own self-centered perception of what happened.

Frum is a wanna be. He follows in the footsteps of Smirkin Bill Kristol. He is trying so hard to get a gig on Fox or CNN but he does not quite have all the schutzpah. This pathetic geek is a Canadian and is a disgrace to our country.

DS @ 18:

Canada apologizes for David Frum...but you can keep him.

NYT says Frum became a US citizen last year. On Sept. 11, no less.

How touching.

RickinSF @ 8:

Thick-lipped David Frum comes in handy. I can point to him when my Canadian buddies start climbing their moral high horse.

You can try if you want, but the truth is, Frum is embarrassed by Canada, and Canada is embarrassed by Frum.

I really don't like neocon asshole idiots!

Frum is such a blind idiot that he can't see that ungracious choices generate instructive consequences. Since neo-cons only push ungracious concepts, you'd think they would see the connection. Neo-cons call these instructive consequences 'unintended' because they shirk all responsibility for their choices. When the rest of us understand that neo-cons are willfully ignorant, we may just start ignoring their lies and ungracious designs on empire. Choose for others only as one would choose for one's self. It guarantees gracious choices when honored.

RickinSF @ 8:

Thick-lipped David Frum comes in handy. I can point to him when my Canadian buddies start climbing their moral high horse.

Philip Combs @ 12:

Che Guevara IV @ 11:

Why is David Frum's Canadian ethnicity NOT part of a counter-argument that his ideas represent a form of foreign intervention? (The mother was Barbara Frum, a CBC Radio journalist.)

Same reason we don't rip Canadians a new asshole when they show up HERE to tell us how great they are and how much we suck.

We are a tolerant and civil people.

OK, yeah, yeah, yeah. Maybe some Canadians show up here and wag their uppity, moralistic Canuck fingers at you. But not all of us. I think the US constitution is one of the greatest things conceived by mankind (except for the 2nd amendment - wow, that puppy is so badly worded, they must have all been drunk the day it was drafted). It ought to be lived up to, that's all.

Right wing law-and-order types haven't been on the wrong side of the guns since they were torys in revolutionary war days.
This reminded me of how Houston Mayor Bill White won a Kennedy Award for providing for thousands of Katrina refugees while now-disgraced weenie Tom DeLay was tying up everybodies phone lines demanding troops to surround the Astrodome. I was working in the neighborhood those days and I remember the right wingers I worked with getting all frothy about security and issueing badges to all the right people.

Little known facts about David Frum (or at least things facts Americans might not know):

He is not only the son of Barbara, the well-known CBC journalist, but he is also the son of Murray Frum, a dentist who became one of the richest real estate developers in Canada. The Frum family has donated tens of millions worth of art to the Art Gallery of Ontario in Toronto. This includes $12 million worth of African art and an extremely rare $50 million Bernini sculpture. These are seriously wealthy people. Draw your own conclusions about what influence family wealth may have had on David Frum's conservative politics and activism.

When David and his sister were children, their parents adopted a native Indian child named Matthew. This boy became part of the Frum family and was raised alongside David and Linda in the Jewish faith. As a teen and young adult, Matthew experienced many of the problems of aboriginal people removed from their culture and birth families - he became alienated, rebelled and had problems with the law. He has since straightened himself out, but both David and his sister have written him off.

David's sister Linda is also a conservative writer and activist, and publishes a regular column in Canada's National Post newspaper.

what is it that makes a man who wrote speeches for an inarticulate and illiterate president such an expert on anything more than wrtiting speeches? why is frumm considered , by some, to be more than what he is...a speech writer. he puts nice words on paper to convey what others tell him to convey.

As a Canadian I am embarrassed by David Frum and Charles Krauthammer. How can the US give these guys a forum to spout their idiotic vitriol? They don't seem to get the amount of airtime up here in Canada - I guess because Canadians can see them for what they are.

Bash Frum all you like, he's in a nice comfortable office, while Perlstein sounds like he's in a freaking stairwell.

LOL:

Frum: "I think one of the great biases is people do things and they turn out to be the wrong decision, and then we say, 'Ah, that was foolish or stupid'. I mean, that very smart people have (pauses to think of correct euphemism) imperfect information, and draw from menus and make choices and sometimes don't look good..."

So in other words he's trying to appear magnanimous about Johnson, but what he's actually trying to do is vindicate Bush (whom he no doubts considers "very smart") with the dishonest "imperfect information" argument.

I would get a warm fuzzy feeling whenever I thought about the late Barbara Frum, who was an anchor on the CBC back int eh 80s. Now I just want to puke whenever I hear the name Frum. His sister is a dimwit too. Frum is to Wallace as the Canada is to the US.

Americans. On behalf of all of Canada, please accept my sincere apologies for our worst export to date.
David Frum.

32 comments

Login or Register to post comments.