Go Home

McCain's Schizophrenic Foreign Policy

I begin to believe that "McSame" is not the right appellation for John McCain...he so clearly aspires to be "McWorse". It frightens me that he could be considered a legitimate candidate by any one with more than a two digit IQ. Unfortunately, the Media/McCain Man-Love is so strong that rarely does any news that detracts from "Maverick/Straight Talkin'" meme get through to the average Joe.

But Fareed Zakaria at Newsweek (I know, I was surprised too) broke away from the hivethink to chronicle just how dangerous McCain's understanding of foreign policy is:

On March 26, McCain gave a speech on foreign policy in Los Angeles that was billed as his most comprehensive statement on the subject. It contained within it the most radical idea put forward by a major candidate for the presidency in 25 years. Yet almost no one noticed.

In his speech McCain proposed that the United States expel Russia from the G8, the group of advanced industrial countries. Moscow was included in this body in the 1990s to recognize and reward it for peacefully ending the cold war on Western terms, dismantling the Soviet empire and withdrawing from large chunks of the old Russian Empire as well. McCain also proposed that the United States should expand the G8 by taking in India and Brazil-but pointedly excluded China from the councils of power.

We have spent months debating Barack Obama's suggestion that he might, under some circumstances, meet with Iranians and Venezuelans. It is a sign of what is wrong with the foreign-policy debate that this idea is treated as a revolution in U.S. policy while McCain's proposal has barely registered. What McCain has announced is momentous-that the United States should adopt a policy of active exclusion and hostility toward two major global powers. It would reverse a decades-old bipartisan American policy of integrating these two countries into the global order, a policy that began under Richard Nixon (with Beijing) and continued under Ronald Reagan (with Moscow). It is a policy that would alienate many countries in Europe and Asia who would see it as an attempt by Washington to begin a new cold war.

By what perverse metric could this possibly be seen as in our country's best interest? It's not bad enough that Bush has alienated all of the Middle East against us, now we have to piss off the entire world?

About Nicole Belle
Nicole Belle's picture
Mom, Wife, Media Critic/Political Analyst, Blogger, Austen Fanatic, Unapologetic Liberal NicoleBelle@crooksandliars.com
Share This Post

Link To This Post


92 Comments
lewisnclark's picture

wow... that is some dangerous crackpottery. Confused and aggro is no way to go through life, grampa.

LibertyLover's picture

Yeah, ticking off China -- that's a good move. Who holds our debt these days?
And a new cold war with Russia? "Mr. Putin, Build up that Wall?"

Yikes.
Sounds McCrazy to me.

ysbaddaden's picture

He's gonna attack heaven?

P.D.'s picture

Between his statement about oil and the war and his penchant for lucky charms, I'm getting a little freaked out about now. If he wins I'm going to Canada, that is if I'm not living in box then.

Kim11's picture

I think Grampa wants to be the man who ushers in the apocalypse.

Kryptik's picture

Republican Party: All War! All The Time! There's nothing a little War never solved!

Seriously, can we just shut these hacks up once and for all, or are we going to be subjected to four to eight more years of scary people who want to accelerate the Rapture?

Johnny2Bad's picture

Yep...But Obama's not far behind:

"Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq. He will remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months." Obama '08 website.

"There are still going to be U.S. forces in the region that could intercede, with an international force, on an emergency basis," Obama said between stops on the first of two days scheduled on the New Hampshire campaign trail. "There's no doubt there are risks of increased bloodshed in Iraq without a continuing U.S. presence there." Sen. Obama, July 21, 2007

"A key adviser to Senator Obama's campaign is recommending in a confidential paper that America keep between 60,000 and 80,000 troops in Iraq as of late 2010."
Huff Post, April 4 '08

P.D.'s picture

Remember the Nineties? Why can't Bush wave the magic wand he's always talking about, and send us back in time before he screwed up the country?

Rusty Shackleford's picture

It makes sense that McCain wants to rile up Russia. According to the eschatology of his good friend, Christian Zionist John Hagee, Russia is likely to be the "Magog" named in the Old and New Testaments. According to McCain's close friend, Russia will be a necessary player in the End Times, in which Hagee's (and, presumably, McCain's) god will brutally destroy approximately six billion people.

So McCain's foreign policy makes sense, when one considers the perfectly rational religious beliefs of the people he must appease to get elected.

BIG AND OILY's picture

didn't Hitler also try to gather a like minded coalition of states?

The media is trying to suck all the air out of the news by dragging up the Rev Wright every ten seconds. Sorry, but they just have no time left to talk about a man who wants to be president and talks like a lunatic.

If this were Huckabee or one of the others we would hear more about it, but because it's McCain, he seems to get a pass on him mental qualifications.

I have always given McCain a bit of credit because he began talking about the environment a long time before most other pols did (except of course for a few) But recently he was talking about something and he mentioned that the "extremist environmentalist" were a problem. It sounded to me as though he was trying to put a little or a lot of distance between himself and part of the environmental community. I guess he has decided $$$ outweighs the environment.

xoites (Bitter before Country was Cool) defends Constitution's picture

Instead of seeking the Presidency McCain needs to seek professional help.

xoites (Bitter before Country was Cool) defends Constitution @ 12:

Instead of seeking the Presidency McCain needs to seek proffessional help.

I agree and anyone who is going to vote for him should do the same.

P.D.'s picture

Pissed off patricia, McCain used to be more moderate, but he's trying to appease the religious-right nut balls he's flipped on everything. From tax breaks to the environment. Like Hillary, I don't trust him at all.

I Like Pie's picture

I don't know whether to file this under stupid or nuts? What a f@ck head. We spent all that time under Clinton building a partnership for peace with the Russians and this dweeb just spits in the face of the Russians. Does this moron even know that we were trying to bring Russia into NATO. We were trying to bring about real peace, cooperation, and stability for the industrialized world. Why? Because, we have so much that we could gain and so much that we could lose. Modern warfare between industrialized nations has become to costly. This is the lesson of the 20th Century.

jgr4's picture

P.D. @ 4:

If he wins I'm going to Canada, that is if I'm not living in box then.

It will be that much easier to pack.

jgr4's picture

Do you suppose we'll hear Obama and McCain discuss their respective foreign policies in a debate, or will we still be talking about flag pins and Rev. Wright?

ck's picture

Nicole:
Do we really need to use these tired puns for candidates names? We can leave that to the conservative side of the internet can't we? It's rather childish and doesn't really help anyone out -

P.D.'s picture

jgr4, You're right. Maybe we should go off on journey of enlightenment. At the rate we are going we all will have nothing anyway.

MikeinMD's picture

That's the GENIUS of McCain's foreign policy: make the whole world hate us! Then we can build that big wall all the way around the country (Halliburton no-bid contract, of course) and then nobody could get in or out!

Left&Left's picture

OK America, do you prefer the uppity, racist, Chicago style, black MUSLIM, elitist with the crazy baptist CHRISTIAN preacher or this caring, stately American hero who was tortured to ensure your freedoms? LOL.

I Like Pie's picture

Rusty Shackleford @ 9:

It makes sense that McCain wants to rile up Russia. According to the eschatology of his good friend, Christian Zionist John Hagee, Russia is likely to be the "Magog" named in the Old and New Testaments. According to McCain's close friend, Russia will be a necessary player in the End Times, in which Hagee's (and, presumably, McCain's) god will brutally destroy approximately six billion people.

So McCain's foreign policy makes sense, when one considers the perfectly rational religious beliefs of the people he must appease to get elected.

You know what kills me about those end time nuts. The land of Magog isn't in Russia anymore. It is part of the Ukraine. It's like those morons have not looked at a map in almost 20 years.

I Like Pie's picture

P.D. @ 4:

Between his statement about oil and the war and his penchant for lucky charms, I'm getting a little freaked out about now. If he wins I'm going to Canada, that is if I'm not living in box then.

I bought a really nice tent; just in case.

Mel's picture

Remember the GOP candidate pool, Nicole. It was slim pickins. McCain is all they've got, the best Republicans can show for themselves. The GOP leadership vacuum we're looking at now is because of the 8 years of conservative wretchedness...starting with the dismantling of the EPA, onto Enron, Abramoff, Delay, Iraq, torture, the corruption of the DOJ and dozens of other scandals in between. Who wants to stand up and lead the mess? McCain.

Max and the Marginalized wrote a song about Teflon John.

ysbaddaden's picture

Someone needs to set this photo against a black backdrop saying Big Brother is Watching

Suitable for X-mas gifts of coffee mugs, posters, t-shirts and mousepads.

ysbaddaden's picture

xoites (Bitter before Country was Cool) defends Constitution @ 12:

Instead of seeking the Presidency McCain needs to seek professional help.

I think cops discourage that

and his sugar mama.

Damned good thing that McCain and Hillary aren't on the same ticket. Between the two of them they could do some damage, huh? She's going to obliterate Iran and he's going to piss off China and Russia.

Hillary has spent the weekend telling us that she's a fighter and that she is tough. I'm thinking many of us are shopping for someone who might at least try to be a peacemaker.

Mpls_Dem's picture

jgr4 @ 17:

Do you suppose we'll hear Obama and McCain discuss their respective foreign policies in a debate, or will we still be talking about flag pins and Rev. Wright?

substance? no way! i'm hoping for a future first lady swimsuit competition. that's only sane way to choose a leader.

ysbaddaden's picture

pissed off patricia @ 27:

Damned good thing that McCain and Hillary aren't on the same ticket. Between the two of them they could do some damage, huh? She's going to obliterate Iran and he's going to piss off China and Russia.

Hillary has spent the weekend telling us that she's a fighter and that she is tough. I'm thinking many of us are shopping for someone who might at least try to be a peacemaker.

chainey comes close, he has a pace-maker.

ysbaddaden's picture

Mpls_Dem @ 28:

jgr4 @ 17:

Do you suppose we'll hear Obama and McCain discuss their respective foreign policies in a debate, or will we still be talking about flag pins and Rev. Wright?

substance? no way! i'm hoping for a future first lady swimsuit competition. that's only sane way to choose a leader.

You wanna see Bill in a Speedo?

LibertyLover's picture

P.D. @ 14:

Pissed off patricia, McCain used to be more moderate, but he's trying to appease the religious-right nut balls he's flipped on everything. From tax breaks to the environment. Like Hillary, I don't trust him at all.

He's never been a moderate. With the exception of about 3 times working with the other side of the aisle, he has been a conservative right down the line and the worst kind: party over country.

ysbaddaden @ 30:

Mpls_Dem @ 28:

jgr4 @ 17:

Do you suppose we'll hear Obama and McCain discuss their respective foreign policies in a debate, or will we still be talking about flag pins and Rev. Wright?

substance? no way! i'm hoping for a future first lady swimsuit competition. that's only sane way to choose a leader.

You wanna see Bill in a Speedo?

No!

arjay8's picture

Anyone see McCain's "speech" this morning from Phoenix? Home state and all and he looked half dead. No energy, no punch, like a dead fish reciting the lines. Geez, Dole as a more inspiring campaigner. McC was un-listenably dull and duller. I don't know if he can make it to November.

Me thinks Gramps needs a nap. (Mayhaps retirement...?)

casper46's picture

Well i will agree we need to do something about China's And Wal-mart's anti-American trade practices. But what the hell is he talking about Russia for? He still pissed they didn't back our wonderful adventure to Mess o'topia?

Rusty Shackleford's picture

I Like Pie @ 22:

Rusty Shackleford @ 9:

It makes sense that McCain wants to rile up Russia. According to the eschatology of his good friend, Christian Zionist John Hagee, Russia is likely to be the "Magog" named in the Old and New Testaments. According to McCain's close friend, Russia will be a necessary player in the End Times, in which Hagee's (and, presumably, McCain's) god will brutally destroy approximately six billion people.

So McCain's foreign policy makes sense, when one considers the perfectly rational religious beliefs of the people he must appease to get elected.

You know what kills me about those end time nuts. The land of Magog isn't in Russia anymore. It is part of the Ukraine. It's like those morons have not looked at a map in almost 20 years.

The beauty of their belief system is that they can make anything mean anything. Remember how Bill Clinton was the antichrist? Now it's Obama. And they can PROVE IT! Using numbers and everything.

I think that McCain's foreign policy towards Russia should definitely be examined in the light of the religious beliefs of his pledged supporters, like John Hagee, who pray fervently for Armageddon to come as quickly as possible. It is reasonable to suppose that Hagee supports McCain because McCain is the most likely to bring about an apocalyptic war in the Middle East.

Trittydi's picture

And the democrats are F**king up to such a remarkable degree that we'll likely end up with this POS for president - despite all his faults.

Rove will be vindicated.
*

ysbaddaden's picture

Mpls_Dem @ 28:

jgr4 @ 17:

Do you suppose we'll hear Obama and McCain discuss their respective foreign policies in a debate, or will we still be talking about flag pins and Rev. Wright?

substance? no way! i'm hoping for a future first lady swimsuit competition. that's only sane way to choose a leader.

I always said as long as candidates engage in mudslinging

They should at least have the first ladies mud wrestle.

Dahgrostabphri's picture

It shouldn't be a surprise that the "average Joe" doesn't get factual news. they don't look for it and they don't want it. it's always been true the people who pay attention and get angry about the BS going on are in such a minority that we are time and time again snuffed out by the mass-ignorance shared by the rest of the country.

And when I say mass-ignorance I'm talking about smart fuckers with jobs! people who would otherwise be critical thinkers except they have this aversion to facts and sometime even basic reality. and when you try to talk to them about it they say "I know what's going on" and the reality is they know what you just told them and they won't really even remember that in a day or so and they certainly won't get angry about any of it (except sometimes they get angry but direct it at the wrong people).

To get an average Joe to care about their country is next to impossible. it's not impossible, but it's damn close to it!

fastfeat's picture

And as Ian Hunter said, You're never alone with a schizophrenic...

LibertyLover's picture

pissed off patricia @ 27:

Damned good thing that McCain and Hillary aren't on the same ticket. Between the two of them they could do some damage, huh? She's going to obliterate Iran and he's going to piss off China and Russia.

Hillary has spent the weekend telling us that she's a fighter and that she is tough. I'm thinking many of us are shopping for someone who might at least try to be a peacemaker.

Y'know, when Hillary entered the race, I used to worry that she would have to act like she had balls just to prove that she was tough -- and now that it is coming to pass, I am very sad that she has gone down that road.

LibertyLover's picture

arjay8 @ 33:

Anyone see McCain's "speech" this morning from Phoenix? Home state and all and he looked half dead. No energy, no punch, like a dead fish reciting the lines. Geez, Dole as a more inspiring campaigner. McC was un-listenably dull and duller. I don't know if he can make it to November.

Me thinks Gramps needs a nap. (Mayhaps retirement...?)

Just think what he will look like next to a youthful Obama.

pissed off patricia's picture

arjay8 @ 33:

Anyone see McCain's "speech" this morning from Phoenix? Home state and all and he looked half dead. No energy, no punch, like a dead fish reciting the lines. Geez, Dole as a more inspiring campaigner. McC was un-listenably dull and duller. I don't know if he can make it to November.

Me thinks Gramps needs a nap. (Mayhaps retirement...?)

I didn't see that particular speech but I watched him at one last week. Not only was he flat, but the expressions on the faces of the people there to hear him looked bored as hell. No enthusiasm for what he was saying at all. They looked like they were just counting the minutes until they could get out of there.

eastriver's picture

McBush. McBush. McBush.

That is the perfect moniker for McCain. Handcuff him linguistically to Dubya now and forever. Don't give him any wiggle room. Keep calling him McBush, both in print and in person, until the entire left side of the blogosphere is doing it. Eventually it will seep into the mainstream, and the average peroson won't be able to look at an image of Johnny Mac without a little voice in the head whispering, "McBush..."

Sing it loud and proud, sister.

LibertyLover @ 40:

pissed off patricia @ 27:

Damned good thing that McCain and Hillary aren't on the same ticket. Between the two of them they could do some damage, huh? She's going to obliterate Iran and he's going to piss off China and Russia.

Hillary has spent the weekend telling us that she's a fighter and that she is tough. I'm thinking many of us are shopping for someone who might at least try to be a peacemaker.

Y'know, when Hillary entered the race, I used to worry that she would have to act like she had balls just to prove that she was tough -- and now that it is coming to pass, I am very sad that she has gone down that road.

I know what you mean. She is trying to play a role instead of being herself. The harder she tries, the more pitiful she looks. She doesn't have to come off as a tough guy to be a smart woman president.

MountainMan23's picture

By what perverse metric could this possibly be seen as in our country’s best interest? It’s not bad enough that Bush has alienated all of the Middle East against us, now we have to piss off the entire world?

And I don't know which is worse - that McCain might actually do this, or whether it's just tough talk & blather to scare up a few more votes.

Either way it's dangerous talk.

The Iranians have complained to the UN about Hillary's threat to obliterate them.

The world watches and reacts.

DC's picture

The Fools, The Fools, The Fools!

ysbaddaden's picture

Mpls_Dem @ 28:

jgr4 @ 17:

Do you suppose we'll hear Obama and McCain discuss their respective foreign policies in a debate, or will we still be talking about flag pins and Rev. Wright?

substance? no way! i'm hoping for a future first lady swimsuit competition. that's only sane way to choose a leader.

Too bad Elizabeth Kucinich won't be participating.

Jack Damage's picture

Ummm yea... evidently, that's what we're out to do.. Piss off the entire rest of the world.... I ranted about this on a similar thread last week when C&L first brought up this story.. I find it interesting that this thread leadin sees the potential here pretty much the same way I saw it last week... A resumption of the cold war... Probably the same way anyone with even a smattering of understanding of recent U.S. and world history and an IQ above say 40 would see it. As the saying goes... 'Even a caveman'.... It just doesn't take a rocket scientist to get the implications of what McCains big shot policy speech really means... IF anyone is paying attention, which apparently rules out the MSM with their socalled liberal bias.....

Ya know, I think this nations current behavior at the top of our leadership food chain, almost across the board now, is a big reason why the term 'rogue nation' was coined. It might have been applied originally to Cambodia in the 70s, or Iraq or Russia or someone else in the past, but now it's us....the freaking United States of America who is the bad actor on the world stage today..........Pathetic, we are fucking pathetic and internationally we will remain chained to this image of increasingly being viewed as a dangerous pathetic rogue nation as long as we continue to allow this generation of republicans to run our nation even further into the ground........JD

allihead's picture

McSame? McWorse? How about McCypher?

Apparently everybody supporting McCain is convinced that upon his hypothetical ascendancy he will be the president they always dreamed of: environmentalist, moderate, hardliner, pro-Isreal, pro-peace, tax-cutting, free-market-loving, you name it, he'll be it. just like my imaginary eighth-grade boyfriend.

ysbaddaden's picture

DC @ 46:

The Fools, The Fools, The Fools!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHRq80QNnJM

xoites (Bitter before Country was Cool) defends Constitution's picture

New editorial film about John McCain.

samdog's picture

You get locked in a Tiger-box for several years and see how YOUR opinions of your captor's masters are affected.

Never mind that that was all two generations in the past, this loon is still pissed at the commies! Even though we have a generation of adults living now that (thankfully) have no clue about the RED SCARE, this guy keeps on and on...sigh.

That particular picture of McCain reminds me of that campaign commercial Gravel made where he put his face real close to the camera. They both have the same look in their eyes and it's creepy.

bitter kep306's picture

Why do I get the feeling that McSenile is still fighting the cold war. Expelling the communist and including the 'more important 3rd world' powers comes from the same geo-political thinking of the 1960's? Maybe McSenile is reliving his childhood?

Ruthless People's picture

Primary theft underway http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

YourMom's picture

Let's not forget that it's the corporations who really call the shots.
McWorthless is just shooting his mouth off, but it won't come to anything.
Capitalism as we know it means that we need the rest of the world. The US is so broke that we don't have a choice but to continue as we are.

Left&Left's picture

Does anyone notice that Hillary's staunchest supporters rarely critique McWar on his pathetic foreign, economic, domestic policies. They only seem to come out of the woodwork to slam Obama on anything(especially non-issues) while giving McSame a pass. I believe these "progressives" prefer McFraud over Obama.

cervantes's picture

100 is the median IQ. 50% of the population -- that's right, one half of the American people -- have a two-digit IQ. So keep that in mind as you compose your next snark.

Liberal AND Proud's picture

Left&Left @ 57:

Does anyone notice that Hillary's staunchest supporters rarely critique McWar on his pathetic foreign, economic, domestic policies. They only seem to come out of the woodwork to slam Obama on anything(especially non-issues) while giving McSame a pass. I believe these "progressives" prefer McFraud over Obama.

Yes, McSame and McClinton will run such a decorous and respectful campaign...and the right wing nutosphere will spew mysogynistic tripe at McClinton, and McSame will ride above it (neither condemning it nor supporting it, but allowing it to spew in his name) and McClinton will cry.

YourMom's picture

Ruthless People @ 55:

Primary theft underway http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

OT, but Hillary's still behind, even if you count FL and if none of the uncommited delegates from MI vote for Obama.

YourMom's picture

Liberal AND Proud @ 59:

Left&Left @ 57:

Does anyone notice that Hillary's staunchest supporters rarely critique McWar on his pathetic foreign, economic, domestic policies. They only seem to come out of the woodwork to slam Obama on anything(especially non-issues) while giving McSame a pass. I believe these "progressives" prefer McFraud over Obama.

Yes, McSame and McClinton will run such a decorous and respectful campaign...and the right wing nutosphere will spew mysogynistic tripe at McClinton, and McSame will ride above it (neither condemning it nor supporting it, but allowing it to spew in his name) and McClinton will cry.

or Obama will comfortably win the exit polls, but the election count will mysteriously declare McCain the winner.

Billy Shears's picture

Glad somebody finally noticed this article.

Looks like some more of the GOPs legendary expertise in foreign policy.

allihead's picture
ysbaddaden's picture

I know mine's over a hundred, but I've been told it's hard to measure, because I think from the wrong side of my brain.

Dax's picture

now we have to piss off the entire world?

The entire world is already pissed...

ysbaddaden's picture

cervantes @ 58:

100 is the median IQ. 50% of the population -- that's right, one half of the American people -- have a two-digit IQ. So keep that in mind as you compose your next snark.

64 ysbaddaden Says: I know mine’s over a hundred, but I’ve been told it’s hard to measure, because I think from the wrong side of my brain.

ysbaddaden's picture

Dax @ 65:

now we have to piss off the entire world?

The entire world is already pissed...

In England, that would mean we're all drunk.

Dax's picture

ysbaddaden @ 67:

Dax @ 65:

now we have to piss off the entire world?

The entire world is already pissed...

In England, that would mean we're all drunk.

lol

Dr. Acula's picture

LibertyLover @ 40:

pissed off patricia @ 27:

Damned good thing that McCain and Hillary aren't on the same ticket. Between the two of them they could do some damage, huh? She's going to obliterate Iran and he's going to piss off China and Russia.

Hillary has spent the weekend telling us that she's a fighter and that she is tough. I'm thinking many of us are shopping for someone who might at least try to be a peacemaker.

That's now known as "testicular fortitude".
Y'know, when Hillary entered the race, I used to worry that she would have to act like she had balls just to prove that she was tough -- and now that it is coming to pass, I am very sad that she has gone down that road.

Dr. Acula's picture

LibertyLover @ 40:

pissed off patricia @ 27:

Damned good thing that McCain and Hillary aren't on the same ticket. Between the two of them they could do some damage, huh? She's going to obliterate Iran and he's going to piss off China and Russia.

Hillary has spent the weekend telling us that she's a fighter and that she is tough. I'm thinking many of us are shopping for someone who might at least try to be a peacemaker.

Y'know, when Hillary entered the race, I used to worry that she would have to act like she had balls just to prove that she was tough -- and now that it is coming to pass, I am very sad that she has gone down that road.

That’s now known as “testicular fortitude”.

dhkeen's picture

I wonder if McCain is going to be the nominee?... mayhaps a health concern will snuff out his run and the GOP convention will pick someone utterly new to the Dems?

I couldn't help but feel as I watched the GOP debates that those were NOT the best they could come up with in a real contest. But the power blocs behind the curtains felt there was no use entering the race when the chances were so small. If McCain is grounded by a negative medical report or some other mishap, who could the GOP trot out?

did I just hear Rudy drop his tiara?...

lj's picture

pissed off patricia @ 42:

arjay8 @ 33:

Anyone see McCain's "speech" this morning from Phoenix? Home state and all and he looked half dead. No energy, no punch, like a dead fish reciting the lines. Geez, Dole as a more inspiring campaigner. McC was un-listenably dull and duller. I don't know if he can make it to November.

Me thinks Gramps needs a nap. (Mayhaps retirement...?)

I didn't see that particular speech but I watched him at one last week. Not only was he flat, but the expressions on the faces of the people there to hear him looked bored as hell. No enthusiasm for what he was saying at all. They looked like they were just counting the minutes until they could get out of there.

What health concerns does he currently have? If he is too tired to run will the Repubs have a redo at their convention? Is Romney and the Rev. Huck staying warm?

shiloh's picture

My friends pay no attention to that man behing the curtain! The debates should be very entertaning, McBush trying to answer questions w/out a script. The above picture shows him pointing his finger at us, but during the rep debates he pointed his finger downward to the floor, sort of like a youngster kickin' & screamin'.

With (6) months to go his handlers must be extremely nervous & the rep will soon realize the good ole days were the last (8) years w/Bush once McCain has to take center stage & think on his feet.

There are many reasons why the rep machine did not elect McCain in 2000 & as Limbo has said many times McCain is not electable ...

spiritcatcher's picture

you already pissed off the entire world, only that we choose to act civilized and tolerate you in exchange for quality tv series and webcomics.

Marc Sadoff's picture

Here's what I wrote the L.A. Times reporters who wrote about his speech that day. I read their whole article in the Times on March 27th, the day after McCain's speech. It did not include anything about his remarks about ejecting Russia from the G8 and excluding China. Not one word. And, to make matters worse, the article painted him as moderate and cooperative. Blechhhh.

Dear Paul Richtor and Maeve Reston,

Your headline for this article read, McCain Stresses Cooperation In L.A. Speech On Foreign Policy, and the sub heading says 'The presumptive nominee avoids the strong talk...."
So, let me get this straight. Expelling Russia from the G8 and opposing China becoming a member of the G8 is seen by you as mild and cooperative.

Well, I guess you believe this is so, since apparently you did not even hear McCain's comments relating to the G8. So, consequently McCain's cooperative and milder ideas regarding the G8 are only reported to Los Angeles readers if they frequent progressive web sites or other newspapers.

How could you do a reputable story on this speech without including his remarks about China and Russia regarding the G8?

It's either a mistake or your coverage is slanted and biased. Please help me to understand. Am I mistaken? Did he not make those comments? Did you not fail to report them?

Their email is paul.richter@latimes.com and maeve.reston@latimes.com

John Walcott's picture

"On March 26, McCain gave a speech on foreign policy in Los Angeles that was billed as his most comprehensive statement on the subject. It contained within it the most radical idea put forward by a major candidate for the presidency in 25 years. Yet almost no one noticed."
Not true:
"What's McCain thinking when he says boot Russia from G-8?
"By Matt Stearns and Warren P. Strobel | McClatchy Newspapers
"Posted on Thursday, May 1, 2008
"WASHINGTON — John McCain dropped a little-noticed bombshell into his March foreign-policy address: Boot Russia from the G-8, the elite club of leading industrial democracies whose leaders try to coordinate economic policies.
"One major problem: He can't do it because the other G-8 nations won't let him.
"But the fact that he's proposing to try, risking a return to Cold War tensions with the world's second-largest nuclear power after 20 years of prickly partnership, raises questions about McCain's judgment. It also underscores that many of his top foreign-policy advisers are of the same neo-conservative school that promoted the war in Iraq, argue for a tougher stance toward Iran and are skeptical of negotiating with North Korea over its nuclear program."

neil's picture

Actually, we've already pissed off the entire world. McWorse will just make sure nobody ever trusts us ever again - thus finishing the job.

EMPY's picture

Has anyone seen this reported on any station yet? CNN, NBC, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, FOX? Has any major newspaper reported it? What the fuck is wrong with our reporting? It doesn't seem to matter how many letters, e-mails or calls are made about these kinds of issues, nothing changes except for the worse. CNN, thanks for hiring ANOTHER Whitehouse mouthpiece from the least credible administration ever.

Mike the Canuck's picture

Rusty Shackleford @ 9:

It makes sense that McCain wants to rile up Russia. According to the eschatology of his good friend, Christian Zionist John Hagee, Russia is likely to be the "Magog" named in the Old and New Testaments. According to McCain's close friend, Russia will be a necessary player in the End Times, in which Hagee's (and, presumably, McCain's) god will brutally destroy approximately six billion people.

So McCain's foreign policy makes sense, when one considers the perfectly rational religious beliefs of the people he must appease to get elected.

Rusty, what the hell is a MAGOG?

ciloisin's picture

McCain looks a lot like Colonel Tigh from Battlestar Galactica. Just give an eye patch andthey would look identical. Maybe he is a cylon?

Rusty Shackleford's picture

Mike the Canuck @ 79:

Rusty Shackleford @ 9:

It makes sense that McCain wants to rile up Russia. According to the eschatology of his good friend, Christian Zionist John Hagee, Russia is likely to be the "Magog" named in the Old and New Testaments. According to McCain's close friend, Russia will be a necessary player in the End Times, in which Hagee's (and, presumably, McCain's) god will brutally destroy approximately six billion people.

So McCain's foreign policy makes sense, when one considers the perfectly rational religious beliefs of the people he must appease to get elected.

Rusty, what the hell is a MAGOG?

Here's a taste. Plenty more kookiness out there if you Google "Gog and Magog."

pinkobait's picture

Well what more can we expect from a man who's head is shaped like an unshelled peanut?

chris [not the troll]'s picture

"our country’s best interest"? Since when is that of any relevance to a modern-day American politician?

Tim in Japan's picture

McCain wants to kick Russia out of G8 and no one is on his case about being anti-Reagan?
The U.S. has moved about 5 steps too far to the right.

krome's picture

OK, this has been happening alot lately. I can't get any of your stuff to play. The usual QTime window comes up and says Done w/out playing anything. It ain't FF and it ain't me; I've retsarted and rebooted and when I try to DL I get an Object Not Found. WTF?

And while you're at it we might try figuring out why almost all the YouTube imbeds don't work unless I open a YT window. Cheers.

[Hackers attacking. Sorry-Sitemonitor]

roadster's picture

pissed off patricia @ 27:

Damned good thing that McCain and Hillary aren't on the same ticket. Between the two of them they could do some damage, huh? She's going to obliterate Iran and he's going to piss off China and Russia.

Hillary has spent the weekend telling us that she's a fighter and that she is tough. I'm thinking many of us are shopping for someone who might at least try to be a peacemaker.

Both of them are fighting for the damned testosterone vote. I hope Obama doesn't feel the need to join in.

craig's picture

" ...many countries in Europe and Asia who would see it as an attempt by Washington to begin a new cold war."

The entire aim of the neo-con agenda was (as still is) to start another cold war. Once the Berlin wall fell, the ideas about Iraq, and Iran started almost immediately.

(I believe it was part of the soviet's decision to break apart Russia. It was a long term goal of bleeding us the way we bled them in Afghanistan. They KNEW we'd start imposing ourselves as soon as they widthdrew. Now they are sitting fairly poised to make inroads into our economic dependance on a resource they can exploit.)

Pearl, Wolfowitz, Podhoretz, all thought they could "capitalize" on the congressional/military/industrial complex need for funding "rationals" by casting the "axis of evil" as a replacement for Russia. They thought it would help Israel. And Israel, foolishly bought into it.

Now, clinging by their teeth, they hope that either Hillary, or McCain will come to their rescue.

I am convinced that in order for things to change in the middle east, there needs to be a revolution in Washington, not Iran.

We need guillotines more than elections, but I'm game for one more try.

Toss the bums out!

HW's picture

Right and if you had a brain you would be dangerous!

JerryO's picture

'I see dead people'

Darrell Kern's picture

McCain does not have a schizophrenic foreign policy. In fact, John McCain doesn't even know what foreign policy is. There is yet another item that sugar momma-stepford wife Cindy will have to purchase. Hopefully she won't have any money left when this bullshit joke of an election is finished.

Phillip's picture

All the current media noise is just noise... if the Democrats just focus on the Iraq war and the economy they will crush the Republicans in November.... it is pretty simple.... McCain offers no change with either topic.... nothing new... this is a change election.... very simple...

bshock's picture

McCain's foreign policy is just a symptom of the man's overall senile dementia. I've heard a number of phony journalists claim that McCain is intelligent, knowledgeable, and even charming, but I've never seen a recent media appearance from this poor old man when he seemed entirely coherent. When are we going to take journalists and news organizations to task for their stupidity, their shallowness, their greed, and their conservative bias?

It's okay to shoot the messenger when the messenger lies.

Comments are closed on this entry