Late Edition: Roy Blunt Confirms McCain is Third Bush Term: <I>"And I think that's a good thing"</i>
By Nicole Belle Saturday May 10, 2008 9:30pm
Bless his little heart, let's have House Minority Whip Roy Blunt on every week to talk up John McCain's candidacy! Talk about living within a bubble, Blunt thinks nothing of touting the McSame presidency as a Bush third term, despite the record disapproval rating for the man and the vast majority of the country believing that the country is going in the wrong direction under his leadership. Apparently, Blunt didn't get the memo that McCain is trying to distance himself from Bush and as Rep. Chris Van Hollen points out, on the two most important issues to the American people, McCain absolutely equals Bush. And Roy, that's not such a good thing.
Download | play 
Download | play (h/t David)
BLITZER: When it comes to domestic economic issues, what is the major difference between President Bush's policies, what he wants to do, and what John McCain would do if he were president?
BLUNT: Well, I think what John McCain wants to do is continue these pro-growth tax policies that our friends on the other side have been talking for sixteen months now…
BLITZER: But that's what President Bush wants to do too.
BLUNT: And there is nothing wrong with that. There is nothing wrong with that.
BLITZER: So it would be in effect a third Bush term when it came to pro-growth tax policies?
BLUNT: It would be. I think it would be. And I think that's a good thing. You can't go out in the country anywhere and find people who believe that doubling the capital gains rate is a good thing, that raising the highest rate on every small business in America is a good thing, that eliminating those bottom brackets, that mean that people at the lower levels of tax pay less taxes than they would otherwise. In fact, I think one of the reasons that the economy has slowed down the way it has is the fact that there's great uncertainty about how those tax policies move forward.
(I)t’s nice to see Blunt conceding the point. McCain is promising more of Bush’s economic agenda — unaffordable massive tax cuts for the rich that offer no help for the average family.
The McCain economic agenda includes: $1.7 trillion tax cut for corporations, $300 billion a year in tax cuts that aren’t paid for, and a plan that delivers 58 percent of the benefits to the top 1 percent of taxpayers and only 9 percent to the bottom 80 percent.
Full transcript below the fold
BLITZER: When it comes to domestic economic issues, what is the major difference between President Bush's policies, what he wants to do, and what John McCain would do if he were president?
BLUNT: Well, I think what John McCain wants to do is continue these pro-growth tax policies that our friends on the other side have been talking for sixteen months now…
(CROSSTALK)
BLITZER: But that's what President Bush wants to do too.
BLUNT: And there is nothing wrong with that. There is nothing wrong with that.
BLITZER: So it would be in effect a third Bush term when it came to pro-growth tax policies?
BLUNT: It would be. I think it would be. And I think that's a good thing. You can't go out in the country anywhere and find people who believe that doubling the capital gains rate is a good thing, that raising the highest rate on every small business in America is a good thing, that eliminating those bottom brackets, that mean that people at the lower levels of tax pay less taxes than they would otherwise. In fact, I think one of the reasons that the economy has slowed down the way it has is the fact that there's great uncertainty about how those tax policies move forward.
BLITZER: Do you want to respond to that?
VAN HOLLEN: Sure. Look, I mean, the Bush economic policies have helped drive this economy into a ditch. The economy has lost $260,000 in the first four months of this year. And John McCain...
BLITZER: 260,000 jobs.
VAN HOLLEN: Jobs in the first four months. And John McCain does represent a continuation of the Bush economic policy, as Roy just acknowledged. And the fact of the matter is, people are hurting. The one thing this president doesn't understand and John McCain doesn't understand is the economic squeeze the families around the country are feeling.
And when it comes to Iraq, again, this is a continuation of the Bush policy.
So on the two biggest issues on the agenda today, the war in Iraq and the economy, he represents a continuation of George Bush.
Login or Register to post comments.
Yeah, sure. That's the winning ticket alright. NOT!
Forgive me for making this rather shallow point, but every time Roy Blunt appears on a TV screen I can't help but be reminded how many republicans are as unattractive as they are greedy.
Now does everyone see why Hillary's fighting so hard? The Republicans are The Gang That Can't Shoot Straight. Will only become more apparent as we get past the conventions and closer to November. All the Democrats have to do is let them talk.
The Democratic nominee would have to do a face-plant of epic proportion to lose to these bozos. Even after performing it, the Republicans might top it. The party of Larry Craig and Vito Fosella and Mark Foley isn't going to change its spots overnight.
Pass that Blunt!
Pro-growth in anything measured in US dollars (ready for $5 gallon gas?), as the Republicans cut taxes on the rich, rob the Treasury, and give IOU's to any suckers dumb enough to hold US currency.
I love it, Roy Blunt blames the current economic troubles on the prospects that a Democrat might get elected President! Talk about brass balls!
Roy "It's a good thing" Blunt is channeling Martha Stewart now?
Hey C&L,
Check out this video on Clinton's site - it has a "newspaper headline" about Obama being against the gas tax holiday, but the article is actually aboout Troopergate!!
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/video/182.aspx
Here's where I heard about it:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&fo...
I downloaded the QT of it if you need it. Better hurry - they're sure to take it down soon - once they realize!
I believe I've seen Rep. Blunt's name in some police reports, following the murder of some individual, due to "blunt"-force trauma caused by a "blunt" instrument used to beat in the skull of some murder victim...which, although not as severe, is the way one feels after watching Rep. Blunt talk, as if one has been hid over the head repeatedly by some sociopathic psychopathic Republican...who's advocating more of the same sociopathic psychopathic policies of the corrupt, un-American and outright evil Bush administration.
OT, but clip on tonight's "American Dad" on the history of Ollie North is hilarious!
If you're on the West Coast, worth watching the first 15 min at least.
Blunt:
Where do the Repubs find these ass-hats?
omg, this is hilarious. This Blunt fella is manna from heaven.
I'm not sweating the $4/gallon gas.
I'm not sweating the jobs that have disappeared overseas.
I'm not sweating $5/gal milk, nor $2.50/loaf bread.
I am, however, experiencing quite a bit of uncertainty about pro-growth tax policy.
What a doofus.
I really don't think most Americans who are battling high costs of gas, food, college, health care, etc, ever give a second thought to the problem of doubling the capital gains tax. Once again, GOP = Out of Touch.
Thank you for the campaign commercial footage congressman Blunt.
If you think that's bad, we here in the Show-Me State have had to live with this jerk's son as our Governor for the past 4 years.
Our henpecked Boy Wonder Governor decided that he would bow out after one term when the First Lady decided that she did not like the Governor's Mansion in the State Capitol.
Because over 90% of the country doesn't get capital gains, dumbass! And of that over 90%, I would say most of them have no idea what the captial gains tax is right now. But that 90% does know that they're fighting like hell to make their job pay their bills, and that the wealthy in this country sure seem to have it easy.
What a shit-for-brains. Excuse me, what a Republican.
Toes @ 14:
Yet more nepotism. Is the GOP now the party of the aristocratically entitled elite, by birthright?
Otay @ 10:
Men's restrooms at the airport.
captures the situation perfectly.
thanks for playing.
miss_kitty @ 17:
Hey, that's reaching low...and wide...
Just the way I like it!
Pro-Growth Tax Policies is a frigging oxymoron and everybody knows it, Blunt. Well, except for the choir your preaching to, that is.
sherifffruitfly @ 7:
OMFG so funny, that is definitely an "oops pardon me while I put on my coat and leave" moment for a staffer.
McCain Supporters Divided On How Much They Love George W. Bush
May 11, 2008 04:05 PM
Ahh, John McCain and George W. Bush. Where does one man end and the other man begin? If you're left feeling confused as to whether McCain's a party-line busting rebel with his own maverick ideas or a genuflecting toadie of the current regime for whom the only question is whether George W. Bush is the greatest president or the greatest president EVER IN LIFE!...you are not alone. McCain's own surrogates can't seem to make up their mind.
Mitt Romney, the robot who ran for President powered only by silver medals and fraud, has been auditioning to be a great leaden weight around McCain's neck - or, as Romney puts it, "vice-president." So he took up McCain's cause today on Wolf Blitzer's Late Edition emphatically denying that McCain was going to be a continuation of the Bush doctrine: "Well I think you're going to hear that time and again, Wolf, throughout the campaign season. And I just don't think it's going to stick."
--------------------
BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Did he really just say what I think he said?
the gop and the reichwingneocon nuts really must
enjoy banging their heads on the wall....why else would
they want to commit political suicide?
Unfortunately because Bush has driven us into the fiscal ditch, Blunt may have something of a point. The economic situation is highly volatile now, one wrong turn against the little guy or the big corporation can spell a downturn no one wants to see.
Investor’s eyes are wide open to international markets and will turn their wealth towards wherever those opportunities are; in fact they are welcoming a downturn because they can acquire assets at a bargain. It’s no longer a simple matter of raising or lowering taxes at a particular class of people, the rich are going to find the tax advantages regardless because they move the economy, neither side have helped employee’s or small business over the years.
Both sides are full of crap
This is such BS. Pressing all the hot-buttons they can find while lying about the true situation with the tax-cuts.
Bastards.
*
sherifffruitfly @ 7:
managed to watch half on Hillarys site, coundnt download it at all, stopped half way through playing.
but Youtube still works.
but the Youtube embedded video on hillaryclinton.com is buffering buffering and not playing, somebody is panicking there and pushing random buttons to make it go away.
Sunday evenings a wonderful time to have a panic, all the grownup web staff are away only the kids remain.
cboy @ 2:
Thats a perfect way to describe it!
If there is a perfect example of the throw-back, beatle-browed troglodyte, Blunt is it. A Neanderthal if ever there was one. With a pea-brain to match. I'm always amazed he knows how to speak and I'm sure if he just grunted and scratched his arse he would be more true to form.
Come to think of it, that pretty much sizes up the whole damned bunch of Republicans.
Hopefully he'll get thrown in trash with the rest of his bushy ass-clowns so we can then PROSECUTE him for War crimes too!
The Jon Stewart, Olbermann, Colbert might appreciate a copy.
Its rather funny in a OMFG way, somebody better keep a 'S' watch on her staffers or video guy.
Well that leaves 33% for the 81-99%'ers, and that's me so fuck everyone else.
it still works, go download it PDQ.
Blunt should be sharing a prison cell along with DeLay and Boehner for their money laundering scheme to funnel money through phony charities back to Repug polititions.
"Pro-growth tax policies"?
Jesus, these idiots in the media really are just mindless parrots.
sherifffruitfly @ 7:
This is Hillarys 3AM moment , she is either dialing and cursing at the tone or on the phone screaming obscenities at some drunken junior staffer who hasnt a clue what to do about the website.
"It's the pro-growth tax policy, stupid!"
RB-Chicago @ 31:
And who, pray tell, is going to charge ANYONE involved in the current Administration with anything? No one has done anything so far. And no one will do anything.
Blunt said he believes in taxing the poor!!!
I'm still laughing at Blunt; and I've been laughing for at least an hour.
Referring to Bush 's tax policies Blunt says that one of the reasons our economy is bad "is the fact that there’s great uncertainty about how those tax policies move forward". This man is delusional.
It is like on 30 Rock if anyone watched last Thur. A Bush lackey is talking about a ceiling that is clearly leaking and he says no it's not we did a study and it is not leaking. Hilarious!!
Consider this. How does a person within the GOP try to change the Bush policy without sounding antiBush? By supporting McCain! As I watch this race unfold and watch carefully the McCain "express", I have convinced myself that he is a clown and cannot win. If there are smart, savvy members of the GOP who want to see this regime changed wouldn't they associate McCain with Bush to the end to turn off the voters? That way you save your seat but change the landscape without making waves.
Food for thought.
www.invadeburma.com
well, it's time to really phantom how really ignorant the american public is in light of the mccain term being categorized as bush's fourth term. Will they, can they actually vote this man into office in spite of this characterization. In a word, yes. In two words, hell yes. Ignorance in this country has no bounds. may they all rot in hell.and not becuase they have destroyed a country, namely this one. Rather it's because of their destroying another country and killing the innocents within. yes, dear ignorants that would be Iraq and GW's war.
is Roy Blunts hair plugged on or is that a toupee?
Granted, Bush economics is obviously wrong headed in most respects. Hillary and Obama are offering the opposite which is also wrong headed.
Republicans want lower taxes but with increased government spending (wars+increased deficit).
Democrats want higher taxes and with increased government spending (entitlement programs).
I want lower taxes, with DECREASED government spending and a real effort to pay down the national debt and fund social security. I think we have enough history to show that government is horrible at spending your money.
I wouldn't vote for McCain, but why the hell should I vote for Obama or Hillary???
At the risk of sounding repetitive... what a douche bag.
For the record, I was referring to Blunt, and was not flaming anyone who posted near my comment...
You people are missing the point.
Now that you've done everything in your power to hand them Barack Obama as the Democratic nominee instead of Hillary Clinton, they feel they can say ANYTHING they want and it won't hurt their chances of winning the general election in a landslide.
Yes, now they think they can literally say they're running George W. McCain as their nominee and it won't take away a victory in November.
Unfortunately, they're probably right.
we're headed for economic crisis and his solution is full-steam-ahead?
All of these fascist thugs with (R) after their names are batsh!t crazy. There is no other explanation.
It's easy to see why this country is being flushed down the toilet. These guys are real trophies.
What stood out to me in that clip was not Blunt but Blitzer. "It would be in effect a third Bush term when it came to pro-growth tax policies?" he parrots right after Blunt says it. What if he were objective & said instead "when it came to what you term to be a pro-growth tax policy".
That's one of my favorite euphemisms "pro-growth".
Also, these guys look like they're intelligent.
It's Me @ 50:
yep. The GOP vs "the American Idol" candidate. It's in the bag for McCain now.
Oh, please. Please! PLEASE! Run on that platform and tell the Nation "You've had eight years of a 'good thing.' We can give you four more."
Trust us. We'll show the GOP the proper gratitude.
redsaunas @ 36:
They are NOT mindless nor parroting they know exactly what they are saying and THEY MEAN IT!
What tax bracket do you think a person who has their own news show is in?
cheezebox @ 47:
You are wrong! FDR did one hell of a job spending the people's money on behalf of the people. The reason this country is so fucked up right now, is that the moron's let the rich republican's dismantle all the public programs for a couple of stinking bucks in a GOP tax cut. They might not have a house anymore, or health insurance, or even a job; but they got a $150 tax cut from the repigs!!!!! Oh goody, goody, goody. Freakin' moron's!
gwen @ 51:
When the ship starts taking on water, the repukes will lock all of us down in cargo, while they escape in the lifeboats,cracking jokes and laughing the whole time.
I wonder how many years it's been since one of these repuke bastards did something, ANYTHING, for anyone other than themselves. Pro-growth tax policies? Yeah right. We are growing the massive fortunes of the top richest 5% at an exponential rate, while everybody else is going down.
It's Me @ 50:
You sound like a concern troll.
Hillary was dead in the water when this came out!
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Peter+paul+v+clinton&search_...
I got bitched at by site monitors on this site, had all my post removed and was told(by this site monitor) I could cost the election by bringing attention to something that had hundreds of thousands if not MILLIONS of hits already on youtube.
Do you not think the repubs(and MSN) knew about it all along and THAT is why ALL of them wanted(and still want) Hillary to win!
She is the ONLY one McCain could beat!
Obama IS the candidate because of the will of the people! It will be IMPOSSIBLE for ANY repub to win and for you to even say it makes you sound like Karl Rove.
He was dead wrong about the outcome of midterm elections and he predicted that Mr. Bush’s approval ratings would rise again, that Iraq would “be in a better place” and, perhaps most significant for his own legacy, that a Republican candidate had “a very good chance” to win the 2008 election because the Democrats would nominate Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Wrong...wrong...wrong...on all accounts wrong.
Obama will soar to victory because the more people get to know john Magoo and his policies(no thanks to MSM), the more they will despise him.
Face it...Obama '08.
No one ever accused Blunt of a wealth of intelligence. Hell, after the House GOP caucus gets another shellacking in November, he'll probably be tossed out of his leadership post.
Selling Boooosh economics will be a tall order even for the noise machine. People are stupid, but not that stupid. But I encourage Blount to keep that on the front burner, I am sure Obama is scared shitless.
I guess someone needed to speak for the silent but deadly 20% who are clueless.
If you aren't rich (and I don't mean families that make up to even a couple of hundred thousand a year, I mean real money) and you vote for Republicans, it's like slitting your own throat. They don't give a damn about you. You aren't even worth mentioning to them. And if you are poor, really poor they despise you. Plain and simple. Now if you are a corporation, now they want to give you a tax break. If you aren't rich you would have to be insane to vote for these guys.
I hope someone on Obama's campaign staff saves the video and puts it in a commercial this fall.
Ummm , not exactly , you moronic douchebag.
The economy has slowed because of years of fiscal irresponsibility demonstrated by the Chimpy administration and the insanity of paying for a bogus "War On Terror" that doesn't exist...........
"Pro-growth tax policies" should always be in quotes. What is so described is simply unsustainable deficit spending, and while it can be sensible (as short-term stimulus) to spend more than is being pulled in in revenue, it doesn't work long-term. It is a mystery of successful propagandizing that the policies causing crushing debt and recession can be called "pro-growth" without inducing howls of laughter.
We've had as close as we're going to get for a direct comparison of ideologies. Under Clinton, the US managed to hit a surplus, all the while experiencing a boom. Lenders to the US were given confidence that the spending/revenue ratio was being managed.
Under Bush, the US has spent several TRILLION of borrowed funds, while incurring some 3 trillion more in longterm costs through the occupation of Iraq, all while Soc Sec generated surpluses.
We were heading for a recession anyway due to the boomers retiring, but Bush has ensured we are getting a running start at it, due to the utter failure of conservative ideology.
Funny how you never hear this from the politicians.
Otay @ 19:
That would depend upon your stance
tubino @ 68:
I agree but would also ask what Bill Clinton ever did to create jobs or plan for the jobs of the future?
Nothing... thats what.
The economy was good during his adminastration ONLY because of the comming turn of the century in which all computers needed to be updated before we were all y2ked.Once all computers were updated the jobs he supposedly created dissapeared along with the year 1999, nothing more nothing less.
Unless Bill was personally responsible for bringing about the turn of the century, he had NOTHING to do with the "boom" of the '90s except to take credit for it and then sit back, get impeached and watch as jobs and surplus evaporated!
Blunt's livin' in his own privat I don't know.
Even Fred "working class=lower class" Barnes can smell the coffee.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/096pst...
Notice they cite the exit polls indicating that many Clinton voters would vote for McNasty if she didn't get the nom. Don't they listen to Lush?
StevePam @ 70:
Yes, the dot com boom was because of the Y2K patch, riiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
Jesus, the crap some people come up with, seriously.
cheezebox @ 47:
Sorry you can either have lower taxes OR a real effort to pay down the national debt.
Libertarians always wanting their cake and eat it too... LOL.
The Dude @ 74:
Ok, so liberals like tax money to be wasted on unnecessary wars, inefficiencies of medical care, and expensive wall street bailouts? Since when is being efficient and frugal with tax payer money a bad thing?
Don't be numb-headed to think you can't lower taxes while also increasing the effectiveness of the programs we already pay for.
The only thing growing is the debt. Shitheads.
The one thing I missed in this video with Roy Blunt is republican House Minority Leader Bohner. When Bohner ties one on, he gets all slobbery whiney and cries like a baby. Him and Blunt make a great losing team for Republicans.
Rep. Chris Van Hollen deserves some credit for poking the stick in Blunt's eye on this. Blunt never speaks of taking a pay cut as a Congressman during these economic times does he?
miss skeptic @ 12:
I would not say the GOP is "out of touch" with respect to capital gains. Rather, the Repubs know what they are doing, and it is lying to the American public. Most Americans don't have enough investments to worry about capital gains tax. It is the rich who reap the benefit from this tax cut. And the Republicans continually sing the same talking points and claim lowering the capital gains tax is good for the economy. No it is good for the wealthy ! Is there a Republican that can speak honestly to the American people?
Does anyone think they would trust this guy?
A shyster is someone who acts in a disreputable, unethical or unscrupulous way, especially in the practice of law and politics, or a con artist. While now applied in a non-ethnic-specific sense, it originated as a reference to disreputable Jewish businessmen and criminals.
Pay close attention to "I think one of the reasons that the economy has slowed down the way it has is the fact that there’s great uncertainty about how those tax policies move forward."
That's right folks; he's attempting to blame the market downturn not upon the /current/ president's actual policies but upon the publics concern for what a democratic president's prospective policies might be. The fact that you didn't highlight this passage just shows you've gotten so used to this nonsense you filter it out now. This man is either chronically stupid or a barefaced liar (and I think I know to which I subscribe) and shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the political arena.
"You can’t go out in the country anywhere and find people who believe that doubling the capital gains rate is a good thing" - Well maybe not, but you can find plenty who believe that we should introduce universal healthcare coverage, that we should invest more in public education and that we need to do something about the national debt. So you can't find people that believing in raising taxes as an end in itself? What a surprise! But the majority of the country want things to happen which require tax raises and so.... The only reason a large number of them would want these things but not support tax raises is they've been brainwashed by repeated chants of 'trust me, I'm an economist' from supply-side bozos who believe the economic vitality caused by lowering the tax rate will actually increase tax revenue; something proven to be false time and time and time and time and time again but still clung to zealously by the crooks and liars who run the republican party and the country.
I like that. Roy blunt says the economic trouble is because people are uncertain about the possible tax policies of a Democratic administration.
That's AWESOME!!
He just engaged in "PRE-BLAME"!!
Things are bad because a democrat might get elected.
PRE-BLAME....
What a tactic...!
gf120581 @ 62:
Tossed from the leadership? I don't know: by their sorry standards, this guy and Boehner are major talents. Dump them and they'll be picking from a mighty thin bench.
Kinda interesting that he can talk about pro-growth policies when our economy is tanking. Republicans really do live in lala land.
The Dude @ 73:
Whats your explaination then wiseguy. You don't know any or else you would have corrected me with proof but you have none because I am RIGHT and you are spewing shit!
cheezebox @ 75:
I don't know where you have been hiding, but we already have these things...under a Repub administration leading the Congress along like sheep.
Now if you want to blame the current Dems in Congress for being suckered and/or frightened into following Repub policies, as led by troglodytes like Blunt, Boehner and McConnell...
BLITZER: So it would be in effect a third Bush term when it came to pro-growth tax policies?
Hike up your miniskirt a little more, Leslie. You and Karl Rove are the only ones who would call Bush's tax policies "pro-growth" at this point.
Odd, blunt doesn't look rastafarian to me.
No Roy's right I don't want to see the Capital Gains Tax doubled. I want to see it tripled!!! And where the hell is this nuts head that he thinks the Capital Gains Tax has any effect on small business owners??? Talk about Out To Lunch!
Ah Roy...
___________________________
Politico.com headline - GOP getting crushed in polls, key races
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10238.html
clip -
John McCain is planning to run as a different kind of Republican. But
being any kind of Republican seems like some sort of death sentence
these days.
In case you’ve been too consumed by the Democratic race to notice, Republicans are getting crushed in historic ways both at the polls and in the polls.
At the polls, it has been a massacre. In recent weeks, Republicans
have lost a Louisiana House seat they had held for more than two
decades and an Illinois House seat they had held for more than three.
Internal polls show that next week they could lose a Mississippi House
seat that they have held for 13 years.
In the polls, they are setting records (and not the good kind). The
most recent Gallup Poll has 67 percent of voters disapproving of
President Bush; those numbers are worse than Richard Nixon’s on the
eve of his resignation.
A CBS News poll taken at the end of April found only 33 percent of Americans have a favorable view of the GOP — the lowest since CBS started asking the question more than two decades ago. By comparison, 52 percent of the public has a favorable view of the Democratic Party.
Things are so bad that many people don’t even want to call themselves
Republicans. The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press has
found the lowest percentage of self-described Republicans in 16 years
of polling.
"Pro-growth" tax cuts? This is the second recession of the Bush administration. I'd say that tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans are not pro-growth. What a joke. How could Blitzer even use a term like that? WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE MEDIA IN AMERICA? Journalism is dead.
>> WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE MEDIA IN AMERICA? Journalism is dead.
Your still watching them ?
If so you only have yourself to blame.
Because of the internet the MSM are completely obsolete.
There simply is no excuse for legitimizing their lies by patronizing them any more.
Four more years of cynicism and failure. Sounds great, Roy. That's a message that will surely resonate with the voters.
Wow. Talk about clueless and delusional self-justifications.
Why does this motherfucker look like a Romulan? Or is it a Vulcan?
StevePam is a big cry baby.....
People open your eyes, we don't want another republican in office! - it = failure! Lets all get on the same page and vote for Obama! get in tune at http://www.obamarocks08.com
blunt a truely ignorant republican fool.
the mind of a four year old in an adult body about sums up the whole republican party!
HELLO---Who wants more of the same screw the middle class, perpertual wars, deregulation, privatization of public interests, diminishing social programs, advantages for the wealthy, rising prices, and low paying jobs with lesser benefits?
Login or Register to post comments.