The response from the Bush administration and its amen corner to the blistering charges in former press secretary Scott McClellan's new book has been quick, brutal and predictable. Of course, it wasn't always this way. Once upon time, Scott McClellan was the perfect mouthpiece for the Bush administration and its right-wing allies.

Here, then is:
"A Look Back at Scott McClellan's Greatest Hits."

the gop reichwingneocons certainly like
to stab each other in the back. this
asinine hypocracy of rove was expected.
the bush administration busied itself with
f#cking the whole country and now that
one of their own speaks up, the
carnage will begin.

What I want to see is a tv show with all the people who have left the republican party and written these books -- books that have all ended up saying the same thing.

Let's make a list of them:

Scott McClellan
Richard Clarke

It's nice to see that McClellan has (somewhat) come to his senses, but I don't feel sorry for him.
He worked for the Bush Administration and had a hand in feeding the American public some of the most dishonest propaganda this country has ever seen.

And now that he has a book to promote, he's seen the light?

Enjoy that book money Scottie. Everyone now hates you.

The Resurrection of Scottie McClellan Begins.

Turn on faux Faux or any of the a.m hate radio azzhats. They are all claiming Scotty is just disgruntled and he wrote the book for money, so the book doesn’t hold water. In other words....ignore the facts and attack the messenger. Typical reich-wing scum.

Sue @ 2:

I am sure at the depth of his soul he (Scott) hurts. Look at the lives lost, the country we have ruined..as I said from the beginning all for male ego.

Sexist or not sexist?

Drop the blossom. Just plain turd.

ChrisM70 @ 12:

Billy Shears @ 5:

What I want to see is a tv show with all the people who have left the republican party and written these books -- books that have all ended up saying the same thing.

Let's make a list of them:

Scott McClellan
Richard Clarke

Joe Wilson/Valerie Plame

Paul O'Neill

Billy Shears @ 5:

What I want to see is a tv show with all the people who have left the republican party and written these books -- books that have all ended up saying the same thing.

Let's make a list of them:

Scott McClellan
Richard Clarke

On the book critical of the Bush White House written in cooperation with former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, “The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O’Neill,” McClellan said on January 12, 2004:

McCLELLAN: “It appears to be more about trying to justify personal views and opinions than it does about looking at the results that we are achieving on behalf of the American people.”

McClellan also took issue with the book by former Bush White House counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke, “Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror,” on March 22, 2004:

McCLELLAN: Well, why, all of a sudden, if he had all these grave concerns, did he not raise these sooner? This is one-and-a-half years after he left the administration. And now, all of a sudden, he’s raising these grave concerns that he claims he had. And I think you have to look at some of the facts. One, he is bringing this up in the heat of a presidential campaign. He has written a book and he certainly wants to go out there and promote that book. …

Douchebag.

dennis @ 19:

Billy Shears @ 5:

What I want to see is a tv show with all the people who have left the republican party and written these books -- books that have all ended up saying the same thing.

Let's make a list of them:

Scott McClellan
Richard Clarke

On the book critical of the Bush White House written in cooperation with former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, “The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O’Neill,” McClellan said on January 12, 2004:

McCLELLAN: “It appears to be more about trying to justify personal views and opinions than it does about looking at the results that we are achieving on behalf of the American people.”

McClellan also took issue with the book by former Bush White House counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke, “Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror,” on March 22, 2004:

McCLELLAN: Well, why, all of a sudden, if he had all these grave concerns, did he not raise these sooner? This is one-and-a-half years after he left the administration. And now, all of a sudden, he’s raising these grave concerns that he claims he had. And I think you have to look at some of the facts. One, he is bringing this up in the heat of a presidential campaign. He has written a book and he certainly wants to go out there and promote that book. …

Douchebag.

Wow. nice find. Disturbing and Maddening, but very telling.

Secret Service to Bush and Cheney:

"Excuse me Mr. President and Vice President Cheny... the new President has ordered me to relieve you of your passports. You are restricted to travel inside of the continental United States until further notice."

ChrisM70 @ 21:

princess @ 19:

Billy Shears @ 5:

What I want to see is a tv show with all the people who have left the republican party and written these books -- books that have all ended up saying the same thing.

Let's make a list of them:

Scott McClellan
Richard Clarke

On the book critical of the Bush White House written in cooperation with former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, “The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O’Neill,” McClellan said on January 12, 2004:

McCLELLAN: “It appears to be more about trying to justify personal views and opinions than it does about looking at the results that we are achieving on behalf of the American people.”

.

Wow. nice find. Disturbing and Maddening, but very telling.

Hardly a nice find. The myopic reich-wingers ran to their list of reich-wing bloggers to stock up on talking points.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/05/as-scottie-sowe.html

Looks like Wexler is demanding that Scottie MC testify under oath before the House Judiciary Committee. From e-mail I received today:

Last night, significant news broke that directly impacts our push for Impeachment Hearings and a possible Inherent Contempt charge for Bush Administration officials such as Karl Rove:

Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan has revealed in his upcoming book that:

• Karl Rove, Scooter Libby, and Vice President Cheney lied about their role in revealing the identity of Valerie Plame Wilson – actions easily amounting to obstruction of Justice.

McClellan also admitted that:

• There was a coordinated effort within the Bush Administration to use propaganda to pump up the case for the Iraq war and hide the projected costs of the war from the public.

Scott McClellan must be called to testify under oath before the House Judiciary Committee to tell Congress and the American people everything he knows about this massive effort by the White House to deceive this nation into war.

Last week, a subpoena was issued for Karl Rove to testify before the Judiciary Committee. It appears he will take every legal action to block this subpoena. The truth is that Congress has the right – and obligation – to hold him accountable now - not months or years from now. It is long past time to pass Inherent Contempt and bring Rove, Libby and others before Congress.

We simply cannot ignore these recent developments, nor should we postpone serious inquiry until after the next election.

Your commitment to accountability for the Bush/Cheney Administration, and the support of 230,000 other Americans who signed up at wexlerwantshearings.com, has inspired and motivated me in my effort to hold impeachment hearings for Vice President Dick Cheney and Inherent Contempt for Rove and others. During the past months I have been a tireless and dogged advocate of this vitally important cause.

Many of you have written me, asking for an update on where we stand with regards to impeachment hearings. I know most of you believe - as I do - that impeachment hearings for Vice President Cheney – are not only justified, but that it is our constitutional obligation to look into the serious allegations of wrongdoing that have been raised. This is especially true based on the newest revelations from Scott McClellan.

I believe that it is the duty of Congress to pursue impeachment whenever there's significant evidence of wrongdoing, be it by Republicans or Democrats, regardless of the timing of elections or the current political environment.

Some of you have written me demanding that I deliver hearings or impeachment. As hard as I have been fighting for this cause, I cannot make impeachment happen by myself. What I can do, and what I have been doing at every turn, is trying to communicate two simple messages to my colleagues:

• the serious allegations of wrongdoing and the clear-cut rationale for impeachment hearings;and
• the fact that the public will support our efforts when Congress boldly acts on the side of justice and accountability.

Unfortunately, to date, these arguments have not been enough to convince even a majority of the liberal and progressive Members of Congress to support impeachment hearings. In addition, the leadership of the Democratic Party in Congress genuinely feels that pursuing impeachment will jeopardize our congressional agenda and threaten gains in the November elections. Although I genuinely disagree with this view, to date I have been unable to convince them to change this policy.

I understand the challenges that we are up against, and I recognize the odds that we face. Nevertheless, I remain unfazed and unyielding.

This new evidence from Scott McClellan could be the tipping point – but we must move quickly. I will use the McClellan admissions to help convince my colleagues that we must hold impeachment hearings.

Regardless, I will continue to fight for progressive values and our Constitution. I will do everything I can to pursue accountability for criminal actions taken by this Administration and this Vice President. I will be a furious opponent to any expansion of this misguided war, and I will fight against the use of torture by our government and to protect our civil liberties here at home.

Most of all, I will continue my efforts to convince my fellow members of Congress and voters, that we should not be a party of passivity - but that we succeed when we present the public with stark choices that are based on the guarantees in our Constitution, and not on the politics of the moment.

I will continue - at every pass - to call for impeachment and accountability. While I wish more of my colleagues supported our movement, we must not let our discouragement lead to apathy and distraction in this important election year when we must break free from eight long years of illegalities, corporate handouts, and a tragic and devastating war.

We should not end the calls for impeachment. I will push against the crimes of the Bush Administration whenever I am provided the opportunity. I will use my role on the Judiciary Committee to take on Administration officials – like I have done with Condoleezza Rice, Attorney Generals Gonzalez and Mukasey, and FBI Director Mueller.

I have not given up our fight to hold this Administration accountable and neither can you. I am grateful for your patriotism and your support. I'll continue to keep you informed and part of the conversation.

Sincerely,

Congressman Robert Wexler

dennis @ 19:

Billy Shears @ 5:

What I want to see is a tv show with all the people who have left the republican party and written these books -- books that have all ended up saying the same thing.

Let's make a list of them:

Scott McClellan
Richard Clarke

On the book critical of the Bush White House written in cooperation with former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, “The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O’Neill,” McClellan said on January 12, 2004:

McCLELLAN: “It appears to be more about trying to justify personal views and opinions than it does about looking at the results that we are achieving on behalf of the American people.”

McClellan also took issue with the book by former Bush White House counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke, “Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror,” on March 22, 2004:

McCLELLAN: Well, why, all of a sudden, if he had all these grave concerns, did he not raise these sooner? This is one-and-a-half years after he left the administration. And now, all of a sudden, he’s raising these grave concerns that he claims he had. And I think you have to look at some of the facts. One, he is bringing this up in the heat of a presidential campaign. He has written a book and he certainly wants to go out there and promote that book. …

Douchebag.

Somebody on this site needs to post this excerpt out of the time warp to the front page.

Ah yes, let the predictable smear campaign begin.

It's always a disgruntled, unhappy employee with an axe to grind. Haven't we heard this EVERY SINGLE TIME someone leaves Chimpy's White House?

The word of the day around the white house regarding Scotty must be "disgruntled" I thought employees who were fired were disgruntled. Scotty quit on his own. I think they like using the word disgruntled because most people associate it with an irate employee who returns to the business place and does something tragic.

An MSNBC reporter who talking to some white house staff said he heard the word "traitor" used in regard to Scotty.

I don't know why he wrote the book when he did but I know it's started a firestorm. Especially among the media news people who are now feeling a wee bit guilty for marching in lockstep with bush in his buildup for the war. Katie Couric admitted she felt pressure from her corporate bosses if she questioned the bush white house before the war.

McClellan, better than anyone, knew what was coming: attacks, name calling, discrediting. Bush policy: kill the messenger.
Let's hope his wife isn't a CIA operative.

pissed off patricia @ 33:

The word of the day around the white house regarding Scotty must be "disgruntled" I thought employees who were fired were disgruntled. Scotty quit on his own. I think they like using the word disgruntled because most people associate it with an irate employee who returns to the business place and does something tragic.

An MSNBC reporter who talking to some white house staff said he heard the word "traitor" used in regard to Scotty.

I don't know why he wrote the book when he did but I know it's started a firestorm. Especially among the media news people who are now feeling a wee bit guilty for marching in lockstep with bush in his buildup for the war. Katie Couric admitted she felt pressure from her corporate bosses if she questioned the bush white house before the war.

The Republican spinners have also been trying to paint his book as being "ghost-written" and constantly repeating that this book "doesn't sound like Scottie".

True Republican Denial.

pissed off patricia @ 33:

The word of the day around the white house regarding Scotty must be "disgruntled" I thought employees who were fired were disgruntled. Scotty quit on his own. I think they like using the word disgruntled because most people associate it with an irate employee who returns to the business place and does something tragic.

And the "fair and balanced" faux has picked up on those White House talking points and is gladly passing them on to the 28%ers. And the reich-wing is claiming that it can't be true since Scotty got paid for writing a book.

ChrisM70 @ 37:

pissed off patricia @ 33:

The word of the day around the white house regarding Scotty must be "disgruntled" I thought employees who were fired were disgruntled. Scotty quit on his own. I think they like using the word disgruntled because most people associate it with an irate employee who returns to the business place and does something tragic.

An MSNBC reporter who talking to some white house staff said he heard the word "traitor" used in regard to Scotty.

I don't know why he wrote the book when he did but I know it's started a firestorm. Especially among the media news people who are now feeling a wee bit guilty for marching in lockstep with bush in his buildup for the war. Katie Couric admitted she felt pressure from her corporate bosses if she questioned the bush white house before the war.

The Republican spinners have also been trying to paint his book as being "ghost-written" and constantly repeating that this book "doesn't sound like Scottie".

True Republican Denial.

Good call. I just heard this twice in the last 20 minutes on the librul MSNBC. Here is the update on the GOPig talking points:

1. disgruntled
2. It doesn't sound like Scotty
3. It's not true because Scotty wrote the book for money

innocent bystander @ 40:

rekroc @ 27:

Looks like Wexler is demanding that Scottie MC testify under oath before the House Judiciary Committee. From e-mail I received today:

Last night, significant news broke that directly impacts our push for Impeachment Hearings and a possible Inherent Contempt charge for Bush Administration officials such as Karl Rove:

Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan has revealed in his upcoming book that:

[Edited. Scroll up or click comment link for the full text]

Sincerely,

Congressman Robert Wexler

i wish that someone would tell the democratic leadership in congress that impeachment hearings are not a political option but a constitutional imperative

Amen!

pissed off patricia @ 36:

If nothing else maybe the media won't obey and push a strike on Iran now.

This may be the best explanation for the why now? question. If Scotty still has a soul, he may be trying to prevent WWIII.

Don't worry folks Bush has got a few more months to finish completely fucking up America.

When he leaves the white house (and he will leave) I wonder if Bush plans to take a dump on the floor of the Lincoln bedroom as a final up yours to America?

piss on katie couric. she was with those assholes every step of the way and still is.

Billy Shears @ 50:

pissed off patricia @ 33:

...I don't know why he wrote the book when he did but I know it's started a firestorm...

I would think it took some time to write -- he was very likely battling some heavy demons during the process, and he knew he had to be meticulous in the accuracy, even though he knew exactly what the Bush-people would say.

But as far as the timing of the book release, that matter is almost always controlled by the publisher, meaning that the decision is based on $, and given that priority I'd say the publishers got their end right.

It will be interesting to see if McClellan comes out and stands up for himself in public. It could go either way, but he'll never get another chance to twist the knife.

Allegedly his book exonorates Bush.

Brad @ 13:

Sue @ 2:

I am sure at the depth of his soul he (Scott) hurts. Look at the lives lost, the country we have ruined..as I said from the beginning all for male ego.

Sexist or not sexist?

Absolutely sexist. Sue seems to forget how many women are involved in the mess this government has created.

anon @ 51:

Billy Shears @ 50:

pissed off patricia @ 33:

...I don't know why he wrote the book when he did but I know it's started a firestorm...

I would think it took some time to write -- he was very likely battling some heavy demons during the process, and he knew he had to be meticulous in the accuracy, even though he knew exactly what the Bush-people would say.

But as far as the timing of the book release, that matter is almost always controlled by the publisher, meaning that the decision is based on $, and given that priority I'd say the publishers got their end right.

It will be interesting to see if McClellan comes out and stands up for himself in public. It could go either way, but he'll never get another chance to twist the knife.

Allegedly his book exonorates Bush.

Is that why the republicans are giving it such glowing reviews?

whether he intended it or not, what he's basically saying is that bush is one ignorant motherfucker.

And Karl Rove is an all-American quarterback who can sprint the hundred.

Scotty is going to be on Countdown tonight. Can't wait to hear the cumulative hissy fits of the reich-wing.

Every time I see a photo of that fat fuck Rove, I personally want to put a ball and chain around his ankle, hand him a sledge hammer, and steer him to 50 years of hard labor for his crimes and misdemeanors.

Hey, the logic is pretty clear on this one. Beloved Leader is the embodiment of all that is good and pure (L'etat c'est Dubya, if you will). Consequently, so much as *thinking* anything bad about him is to hate goodness and purity. Therefore, only America-haters and crazies would dare to impugn the dignity of that paragon of virtue, Beloved Leader. QED.

dennis @ 19:

Billy Shears @ 5:

What I want to see is a tv show with all the people who have left the republican party and written these books -- books that have all ended up saying the same thing.

Let's make a list of them:

Scott McClellan
Richard Clarke

On the book critical of the Bush White House written in cooperation with former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, “The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O’Neill,” McClellan said on January 12, 2004:

McCLELLAN: “It appears to be more about trying to justify personal views and opinions than it does about looking at the results that we are achieving on behalf of the American people.”

McClellan also took issue with the book by former Bush White House counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke, “Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror,” on March 22, 2004:

McCLELLAN: Well, why, all of a sudden, if he had all these grave concerns, did he not raise these sooner? This is one-and-a-half years after he left the administration. And now, all of a sudden, he’s raising these grave concerns that he claims he had. And I think you have to look at some of the facts. One, he is bringing this up in the heat of a presidential campaign. He has written a book and he certainly wants to go out there and promote that book. …

Douchebag.

Very little honor among thieves, liars and associated riffraff is there Dennis?

Hahaahaha! Boy, Rove ain't bringing his best BS-ing game!

He's received the highest honor a former Bush regime member can receive: He's been labled a "disgruntled former employee". In that respect, he's in good company: Paul O'Neill and Richard Clarke have both been recipients of this "honor".

If there's any justice left after this cluster@#$%^&, it'll be a federal indictment for Rove before Nov. Decisions, decisions, Karl: Cop a fast plea and gamble that Bush'll forgive him with a Presidential pardon, or roll the dice on a trial that won't be done until after January 2009? It's so much fun imagining him having to squirm through making that call.

Yes, and Karl Rove is a right wing nutcase. How come democrats and progressives have failed to make the term "right winger" something to be abhorred and solidified as such in the American conscience?

The sight of Karl Rove should sicken every American.

Folks we need a campaign to make that happen.

Scotty should be indicted, not appearing on talk shows. He should be in jail.

geneHUSSEIN214 @ 71:

He's received the highest honor a former Bush regime member can receive: He's been labled a "disgruntled former employee". In that respect, he's in good company: Paul O'Neill and Richard Clarke have both been recipients of this "honor".

Who the hell would want a any other type of "honor" from those clowns!

of course rove and bartlett will deny everything. soon, they will have a chance to deny many charges, but it won't be on fox, but in a court of law.

Sue @ 2:

I am sure at the depth of his soul he (Scott) hurts. Look at the lives lost, the country we have ruined..as I said from the beginning all for male ego.

It's the Yin~Yang totally out of whack............Condi's ego is also far, far too Yang~it's a question of balance, and this entire crew runs contrary to the seat of conscience, as well. The perfect storm for evil.

Hell, bush and ted bundy look as though they were seperated at birth. KKKarl Rove is just a pig, and he looks like one. I'd like to take a pitchfork to him, but when I really ponder the reality of it..........it's just not in me.

This is the first time I have entertained the thought that these monsters could actually end up in jail; a life sentence, in a real prison. They should be tried at the Hague, they will get off too easy here.

Rove is a pathological liar, and IMO, dangerous..........very dangerous.

Rove's comment sounds like coming from a man with a noose dangling above his head.

Vic @ 74:

I wonder if Scotty is gonna come out of the closet and tell all about the juicy details of his flings with Jeff Gannon/Guckart? Hookers in the White House! Big macho hooker with deep voices! It will be a disappointment if Scotty left out those hooker rumors.

I wonder who was in his SUV this morning when he was interviewed in his driveway? It was a female. Is he married? Perhaps another relative or friend? Possibly his cover girl? Was it Candy Crowley? Her cankles match his and Hillarys.

Johan @ 85:

Rove's comment sounds like coming from a man with a noose dangling above his head.

Yes, indeed... it seems the jowled one is feeling the heat on this one...

kerplunk @ 90:

Congaree @ 88:

Vic @ 74:

I wonder if Scotty is gonna come out of the closet and tell all about the juicy details of his flings with Jeff Gannon/Guckart? Hookers in the White House! Big macho hooker with deep voices! It will be a disappointment if Scotty left out those hooker rumors.

I thought they smuggled Jeffy in for Karl and/or Georgie...

My understanding is the side effects caused by Jeffy can be redness and swelling at the injection site.

Sometimes just a lot of spitting or swallowing.

Scotty comes forth when he can make $12.95 a book. Everything comes with a price in the GOP, including the truth.

Is there really any question that the Bush administration manipulated facts and the media to promote the latest Iraq war? Am I mistaken that the administration hired a public relations firm to promote the war?

on the drive home from work, i was listening to hannity--it's kind of a sick ritual i have--and he was frothing at the mouth over scottie's book and lack of credibility, and i wondered aloud to myself "but what about dick morris? apparently he has TONS of credibility in your eyes." then, as if on cue, he had a caller ask him the very same question. it was surreal.

Vic @ 96:

Carolyn Kay @ 94:

Many of the left-wing blogs have completely lost their credibility with their hatred of the Clintons, and that makes them exactly like the corporate media who brought us the Iraq War.

Carolyn Kay
MakeThemAccountable.com

Hate, or disliking of the Clintons is really pale in comparison to aiding and abetting lies for the purpose of illegally invading a country that posed no threat to us or the rest of the world.

Left wing blogs=the corporate media? No, sorry, not even close!

Oops, pale is what I meant.

Someone needs to make Rove squeel like a pig, as in "Deliverance!" I am just waiting for the day when he will meet his comeuppenance. Karma, Rove!

Sounds like a left-wing blogger? Doesn't sound like the Scott they knew? Is this the best you got, Karl?

Left-wing bloggers have a helluva lot more credibility than you have, pal. Is that you way of saying that these charges ring true to you, Karl? Doesn't sound like the Scott you knew? Here are a couple reasons why, Karl, you blowhard: 1) the Kool-aid you all drank eventually wears off; or 2) Neo-con zombies eventually wake up.

Keep tap dancing, Turd Blossom. See you in Danbury Minimum Security Prison.

turd blossom.

an appropriate name for rove and the byproducts of rove.

[Don't post in ALL CAPS! Site Monitor]

"This is getting into trying to finger-point and play the blame game." McClellan on bungled Bush response to Katrina, September 6, 2005.

My oh my, how worm can turn. It'd be hilarious if not for all the human suffering men such as Scott McClellan are responsible for. Worthless fratboy brat fuckturd.

Is it just me or are Karl's "two things" just the same talking point said in two ways?

I would wear an attack from Turd Blossom like a badge of honour. Welcome back to humanity McClellan! See you in court Rove.

rekroc @ 27:

Looks like Wexler is demanding that Scottie MC testify under oath before the House Judiciary Committee. From e-mail I received today:

Last night, significant news broke that directly impacts our push for Impeachment Hearings and a possible Inherent Contempt charge for Bush Administration officials such as Karl Rove:
snipped...

How does one receive these e-mails? I want to get them too...
Cheers, Andrew

The movie "American Gangster" was written by the subject of the movie. He sold rights to his own story.

Now all Scotty has to do is sell the rights to his own story the same way. Who should play the role of Scotty?

CD @ 47:

Don't worry folks Bush has got a few more months to finish completely fucking up America.

When he leaves the white house (and he will leave) I wonder if Bush plans to take a dump on the floor of the Lincoln bedroom as a final up yours to America?

This is gross, but I can actually picture Cheeeeeeney doing this.

Bush will just go around putting ABC gum on all the doorknobs ["heh heh"].

Andrew @ 115:

rekroc @ 27:

Looks like Wexler is demanding that Scottie MC testify under oath before the House Judiciary Committee. From e-mail I received today:

Last night, significant news broke that directly impacts our push for Impeachment Hearings and a possible Inherent Contempt charge for Bush Administration officials such as Karl Rove:
snipped...

How does one receive these e-mails? I want to get them too...
Cheers, Andrew

oops! screwed that one up!

http://www.wexlerwantshearings.com/

fuck colmes...he lets rove lie like a dog

regarding nola....bush stayed in san diego for.....THREE DAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

fuck that fat pompous criminal

oh, and greg palast has intercepted emails from rove which prove that the repugs will be caging millions of black voters come november

ladies and gents...the fix is in...unless we get this fuck thrown right into prison

left wing blogger? scott has finally made the big time

i do love the line "when someone buys it and give me a copy"

i take it scott aint gonna be invited to any repug shindigs

Meanwhile, Rove sounds like the same evil lying sack of donkey spunk he always has.

Billy Shears @ 64:

anon @ 56:

Billy Shears @ 55:

anon @ 51:

Is that why the republicans are giving it such glowing reviews?

I am serious - he blames those around Bush for misleading Bush. He doesnt blame Bush.

He is after all still a Bush sycophant.

Where did you hear this? I just went and looked at stories in the Washington Post, LA Times, NY Times and Reuters, and none of them I saw had any take on the exoneration of Bush. Is somebody publishing the exoneration take, or broadcasting it?

This will have to shake out.

I have heard today from several sources that McClellans publisher may have made 'editorial' changes to the book. I'm am not certain as to the source of that comment.

After the book is released, McClellan and the others will need to comment - Wexler's site states he is going to call McClellan.

I believe it was in an interview on Hartmann today. This is all breaking quickly. But the point - as I remember it - was that Bush was ill served and that Scotty was fingering Rove Libby and Cheney - not Bush.

We all need to defend Scott McClellan because the Bushies will try to discredit and destroy him. Surely he knew that when he decided to tell his story. I'm glad he's stepping forward, along with so many others. He's only telling the truth about what so many of us knew all along and many others have already verified. Screw Karl Rove. He's a criminal and needs to be taken down. When will the media and Congress actually listen and decide to do something about all this??

I also don't think it's fair to suggest that McClellan should have revealed all on his way out the door. Realistically, exactly how would he have accomplished that (editorial, interview, press conference, Senate hearing-none of which would have been effective)?? Others have tried and look how much attention they get. There's so much, and who exactly would he have told? A book has a much bigger impact, and allows him to tell the whole story. We already know the media responds to everything this administration does with yawns and excuses. Besides, I'm sure he needed time to reflect and process the nightmare. I'm also sure he had to consider whether it was worth it knowing the firestorm it would trigger.

Spicegal @ 131:

I also don't think it's fair to suggest that McClellan should have revealed all on his way out the door. Realistically, exactly how would he have accomplished that (editorial, interview, press conference, Senate hearing-none of which would have been effective)?? Others have tried and look how much attention they get. There's so much, and who exactly would he have told? A book has a much bigger impact, and allows him to tell the whole story. We already know the media responds to everything this administration does with yawns and excuses. Besides, I'm sure he needed time to reflect and process the nightmare. I'm also sure he had to consider whether it was worth it knowing the firestorm it would trigger.

Right on the mark !!!!!!!!

Nixon and Staff = Watergate Crooks & And Convicted

Ford = Pardoned Nixon = The Fix Was In - Crook

Reagan & Staff = Treason - Sold Arms To The Enemy - Iran Contra - Staff Charged And Ready For Trial

Bush Sr. = The Fix Was In Again: Pardoned All charged in Iran-Contra To Avoid Convictions

Bush Jr. - The Fix was In again: Stole 2 Elections - Started Illegal War - Added Signing Statements To Laws.- Politicized all branches of government - Encroached on Constitutional Rights - Enacted vast coverup of lies on Iraq War and attacks on it's critics. And On And On. Continued Criminal acts and policys.

Want more of the same? Vote Republican. Vote McCAIN!

They sure don't like it when ex-Bushies turn informant to save their own hides from possible future war crimes and mass murder charges.

The Valerie Plame thing proves that they knew the evidence was false. As retarded as he is, Bush cant claim misinformation or incompetence as an excuse for his pre-meditated, cold-blooded murder of hundreds of thousands of civilians in a non-threatening nation. Every single bit of intelligence and evidence screamed to the contrary, but we had to go through this bullshit charade of WMDs and missiles and terrorist links and aluminium pipes and uranium that was all conjured out of thin air with no basis in fact.

Uphold the law and remove these terrorists and killers from the positions of power they have used to commit their crimes. Its long past time these people were impeached, arrested, and faced the justice they claim to be so passionate about.

ron Ft lauderale @ 132:

Spicegal @ 129:

We all need to defend Scott McClellan because the Bushies will try to discredit and destroy him. Surely he knew that when he decided to tell his story. I'm glad he's stepping forward, along with so many others. He's only telling the truth about what so many of us knew all along and many others have already verified. Screw Karl Rove. He's a criminal and needs to be taken down. When will the media and Congress actually listen and decide to do something about all this??

I agree 100%. Boy, are they going to try destroy Scott. Now don't get me wrong, when he was giving forth all that garbage, I was pissed at him. But, let's look at the cowards in the Whitehouse scrambling "to
punish him" for his new found courage to tell it like it is !! Yes, it is a little late, but better late then never!!! Keep the heat on the fucking Whitehouse!!!!!!!

prisonorbetterforthem @ 128:

I cannot hate Cheney and Rove and Bush (the puppet) enough. I've tried but I've reached my limit, there's no more in me. To expel that feeling, I certainly hope that the courts will, first, get them for Crimes against Humanity and have Fox News show live the sentencing, whatever it might be. Then I'll feel better.

I'm thinking that they can't destroy him, they have no credibility. None. Nobody believes their BS any longer.

So Karl and Scooter were always off having meetings together. Very interesting. "Fox's very own Karl Rove" looks like a liar from the getgo. This entire administration is a full of liars who think that we Americans are too dumb or too insignificant to be told the truth. It's all about keeping us where we need to be, under their thumbs and too tired or poor or sick to fight back. Change can't come to fast!

lordkoos @ 142:

Oh the radio today I heard a lot of attacks on Scotty but I didn't hear any actual denials of any of the allegations in the book.

I heard a little of Limpballs today (hey, I'm stuck in FRESNO), basically saying that "liberrrull media" are buying off guys like Scotty to turn on their Rethug pals.

fastfeat @ 143:

lordkoos @ 142:

Oh the radio today I heard a lot of attacks on Scotty but I didn't hear any actual denials of any of the allegations in the book.

I heard a little of Limpballs today (hey, I'm stuck in FRESNO), basically saying that "liberrrull media" are buying off guys like Scotty to turn on their Rethug pals.

You can get limpballs on 9 stations each afternoon (between 12 - 7) in my area, crying about that "librul" media. Orwell would be amused!

RoothHussein@102:
Anyone asked Pelosi what’s on the table now?

Along with the labial/lip transplant, a new set of facio/muscular strings the bushites work from a hole in the back of her head.

Now that you've destroyed all those emails I suppose it's just his word against yours. Don't cross the street.