Harold Ford, please make it stop.
By John Amato Tuesday Jun 03, 2008 1:50pmHarold Ford so very much wants to be part of the punditocracy that he does what they all do eventually. In one clip he carries himself well by telling Tweety that McCain married into a beer fortune after Chris was going into his Obama doesn't understand the working class nonsense. OK, that's pretty good. However, in the next clip he has to tell the Villagers that McCain's speech was his most powerful evah! Did he see the speech? It was awful. Giving the speech in Kenner, LA was a terrible choice because he could have gone to a Blue state to spread his message and the green background made him almost unbearable to watch. Yes, McCain's very good in intimate settings, but giving speeches to larger audiences is not one of them.
Download | play
Download | play (Beer Fortune) (h/t Heather)
Ford: And he is married, and this is no disrespect or slight to his wonderful wife, but he married into a wonderful beer fortune.
Download | play
Download | play (Powerful speech) (h/t Heather)
Ford: A powerful speech by John McCain this evening!
Even FOX News couldn't control their disdain for his speech. I'll have video shortly of that. Is it part of the Villager sign up card to praise McCain even when it's not called for?








Login or Register to post comments.
I propose a new law: Once you lose an election, you are not allowed to be on TV until whoever beat you is out of office.
Maybe Ford meant "powerful" like stinky "powerful".
Why is he used as a "democratic" pundit, when his positions in no way reflect the Democratic party?
Plus, he's a big conservative loser from a state far removed from Democratic principles.
Plus, HE'S A TOOL....
When does the Obama colonoscopy start? These two will be fighting to see who gets to stick the tube in. Count on it.
Ok, so maybe he is saying that to a dem McLame speech was just so great, which is just going to make Fox viewers think McLame is a liberal (hey the liberals love him), which will help suppress Republicanic turnout this November. Since no libs watch Fox news, the chance that a lib would switch to McLame is negligible. So I can see this as a shrewd move by Ford.
i thought the mccain speech was a SNL clip or something...his cheesy laugh was scary. ugh...we are so going to win in November.
Yep, McBain married a beer fortune after cheating on his first wife who was involved in a car crash and horribly crippled.
What state is Ford from? Delusion?
Oh, Kentucky. I forgot.
I love CnL with all my heart, but this one's a little weak. Not to mention, Mr. Ford, though I respect him, isn't that far from being a Republican himself.
D.G. Bowman @ 8:
Tennessee.
Marrying into beer money = Pro-America!
Marrying into ketchup money = Despicable and fascist!!
i dont get it.. why?? isnt he the head of the DLC? Why is he saying anything at all good about McCain?
It's no different from how they treat the current president. It's a cult of personality authoritarian mindset. These guys are gonna plotz when Obama wins.
He must have been watching a different speech than I was, 'cause the one I was watching had my husband laughing his ass off and me calling McCranky a liar several times.
Okay, they found the one person on earth that had anything positive to say about that speech. I guess there is some sort of value in that, but not to me.
I was also surprised Harold said that about McCain's speech. It must have been specific content....of course. McCain always struggles with the telepromter.
I thought it was nice of McCain to make that speech when he did so that we could draw the vast distinctions between his speaking style and that of Senator Obama. Sort of like comparing the speed of a tricycle to that of a Harley.
Ford must have watched a different McCain speech than the one I saw. In fact, it was so bad that I actually had the impression that just off camera were armed men pointing weapons at the audience to indicate by force when they were suppose to clap and cheer during it. I've heard elementary book reports read by school children that provoked more of an emotional response than McCain speech.
Harold was recently employed by Faux. Perhaps it takes some time to rid yourself of the reich-wing stench and pandering?
Oh good, Matthews is finally happy. He took down Hillary and now he's going after Obama. Can't wait to hear all you Obama folks who spoke so fondly of Chris to start going after him when he begins savaging your guy.
Ford likes MCCain becuase Ford is very similar to McCain. Same kind of crappy right wing politican!
The creepy smile that McCain gives after each rambling statement or pronouncement is really disturbing.
The reply from faux it's not a speech contest. McCain is going to show why the neocons want him. McCain is a over rated and over achieving panderer. Hey he graduated 894/899 in his class......I guess we could give the old guy a break.
It's people like Harold Ford that give dumb guys a bad name.
brian @ 20:
huh? Which Obama folks spoke fondly of Tweety? Tweety is a reich-wing hack. I never trusted him and never will. By the close of the week he'll start a full frontal attack on Obama just like he did with Kerry and Gore.
he is cringe-worthy
Terry Cunningham @ 22:
I couldn't agree with you more. Even if he is making a good point, that smile erases whatever he has just said. It is very creepy and disturbing
You know, even my cat hated McCain's speech. At least, that was the impression I got from watching his reactions. During Obama's speech my cat walked towards the television and kept hitting the screen with his paws and watching the movements of the people. He sat there for the entire thing.
Then, when I watched McCain's speech my cat had an entirely different reaction. He yawned, cleaned his butt and then went to sleep.
mccrazy old man was in la because he is going to choose jindal as his vp
and the dems can go nuts on him
grimcity @ 10:
Thanks, grimcity!
Yours for truth and accuracy, something Repugs don't give a whit about,
DGB
Maybe Ford was drunk... McCain is a eight or nine beer guy (that means after eight or nine beers McCain will start to look/sound good).
McCain's speech was truly terrible but it isn't Ford's job, as a spokesman for Obama, to say that. The commentators did a job job of skewing the speech.
"...could have went..."? That is truly cringe-inducing.
[ http://redwing.hutman.net/%7Emreed/warriorshtm/grammarian.htm -Sitemonitor]
I don't like Ford either because he tries TOO HARD to be just right of center at ALL times. He's like a poor man's Joe Scarborough which is why Morning Joe likes him so much. And that ain't saying much.
I remember reading a Newsweek article like six years ago saying he could be the first Black President. Wow, I'm glad they were dead wrong!
To be honest I think you are missing the point a little here. When he said that McSame gave a powerful speech he meant it only in the sense that it laid a foundation for what is to come. He is beginning to couch the future race on his terms (something the republicans are good at and something the dems have been letting them get away with).
When he says for Obama to be watching I read it as "watch out". He's presenting the speech perhaps too favorably, but if you liberally interpret his use of the word powerful then I don't find many issues with what he had to say.
I know grammar isn't your strong point, John Amato, but please. "... he could have went to a Blue State..."??? Ok, repeat after me: Today I go, yesterday I went but I could have GONE.
Joe O. @ 28:
Your cat has already been cleaned from the voter rolls by the Repubs in your state!
Hey Harold...go join the McCain campaign. You could be the next asswipe in the mold of your hero Joe Lieberman!
The only things that raised after McCain's speech were all of the heads that hit tables after everyone fell asleep.
Bill Muller @ 36:
Thanks Bill for bringing that up! Now I will gone back to work.
I thought it was a powerful speech. I saw it as a very persuasive arguement to vote for Obama.
Doesn't need a telepromter for this "this Bud for you". He won't choose Jindal for v.p......probably Romney
rend @ 12:
Heck! what did the DLC say when Hillary was lauding McInsane? Anyway what can a loser like Ford tell anyone but how to lose?
Is Harold Ford an Edsel?
Since when did McCain get to be the campaign sheriff? He can't decide what the campaign of Senator Obama will be about. He should run his own campaign and worry about what he will do and how he will do it. First thing he might do is learn to read a teleprompter instead of looking like one of the automotrons at the Hall of Presidents at Disney World.
karl @ 42:
http://z.about.com/d/alcoholism/1/0/2/v/1/marijuana11.jpg
brian @ 20:
O.K. she lost. Time to go join the Republican party now. McCain is going to woo you big time! You know you want to don't you?
Harold Fraud, same as he ever was.
To John Amato,
Several times recently I have seen the word "went" used where "gone" is needed. Maybe on Crooks and Liars, since I see that mistake in this post. It should read "could have gone" and not "could have went."
[ http://redwing.hutman.net/%7Emreed/warriorshtm/grammarian.htm -Sitemonitor]
casper46 @ 1:
Well that certainly would've put a crimp in Gore's Inconvenient Truth.
Is it true Stephen Colbert is makeing a mocumentary named An Inconvenient Truthiness?
ford is a proven DLC assjacket.
so Obama was too poor
AND
then Obama was too rich.
Lynn Lightfoot @ 49:
I must say, I obsess on the grammar I used to know and have forgotten. Look I capitalized!!!
It is so important for our blogging team to get the spelling and grammar right the first time.
BaScOmBe against Bitter Elitist Appeasement Bullshit @ 51:
*trying to contain the reverse peristalsis*
rend @ 12:
DLC is the repug wing of the Democratic party. it includes LIEberdouche and Clinton.
At one time, I supported Ford for the leadership of the party. Boy, was I wrong! It appears that party insiders already knew that Ford was a southern dipstick. I will no longer even consider this twit as being material for anything except an errand runner. His ibas against Obama is palpable.
Richard @ 32:
ford is a designated spokesman. I doubt Obama selected him as a rep. this is the usual stacked matthews panel.
Bangkok Post Editorial:
EDITORIALS
The world is ready for BARACK OBAMA
Published on June 5, 2008
Open diplomacy and a friendly face in the White House will improve America's image
After a long, arduous struggle, Senator Barack Obama has proved to the Democratic Party that he is a better presidential candidate than Hillary Clinton. The competition between Obama and Clinton, which has been covered live on global TV networks has shown American democracy at its best. As part of its public diplomacy, the US government should nurture this positive aspect of America's image and build on it.
marko @ 53:
They are all full of shit over at MSNBC. Chrissy Matthews, Keith (I wanna be Jon Stewart) Olberman, Joe (closet case) Scarman, Dan (frat boy) Abrams, and the newest child, Karl Gregory Rove.
By far the worst is that Eugene Robinson who has such a hard on for Obama that he salivates at the mention of his name.
Jack Jett @ 60:
So who do you recommend? Bill O'Rielly?
From what I'm hearing on tv, it seems some of Hillary's supporters are disgruntled over how she handled last night and the way she seems to be trying to pressure Obama for the veep spot. They don't like what she's doing now.
Had she not had millions to loan her campaign, I wonder if she would have stayed in this long.
I remember when Harold Ford used to call in to the Imus show and how he would verbally kiss Imus' ass.
pissed off patricia @ 45:
Rovian Rule #1: Define your opponent. Then no one pays attention to your own flaws.
"Ford has a Bettor Ideal"
"John McCain's not only a candidate, he's also a client!" "Have You Driven With Ford Lately?"
Stray Talk Expressions - Change Depends On Me
I believe Harold Ford was using a rhetorical technique called sarcasm. Maybe you've heard of it?
Lynn Lightfoot @ 49:
Pray tell: what perecisely is the pluperfect subjunctive of concern?
malcontent @ 64:
Harold is a little too stupid to spell sarcasm. He a LIEberdouche DLC sycopant.
Jack Jett @ 60:
I guess that makes you the authority on "hard-ons".
pissed off patricia @ 27:
kinda like bush. On again off again.
mcsame.
[Totally and utterly off topic. And thoroughly unimportant-Sitemonitor]
ysbaddaden @ 50:
Ahhhhhhhhh, but I said on TV, not in theaters.
Ford plays both sides of the fence........it gets him more t.v. time. It could be a good strategy to get on faux. If he was too liberal they may bring him on and never let him complete a sentence. I think he is often effective but not always. Maybe not the best but he is a needed talking head on right wing leaning programs........maybe I'm wrong on this.
BaScOmBe against Bitter Elitist Appeasement Bullshit @ 63:
Rove isn't smart, he's just mean as hell and willing to do or say anything about anyone in order to win. I have a feeling Obama and his campaign people are wise to this crap.
BaScOmBe against Bitter Elitist Appeasement Bullshit @ 66:
If your going to call a person stupid, use words you can spell correctly.
What I think is very interesting from this speech is the fact that McCain, the man that claims he has all of those years of public service experience, still has not grasped the basic aspects of public speaking. A person like him will never persuade foreign leaders or others to support his foreign policies. The only way he can do it is through military force, blackmail, economic leverage or some other method.
If McCain is so damn smart, why is he considering putting a two term congressman with no military service, Bobby Jindal, in the VP slot?
Talk about bad judgement.
-GSD
Dave @ 33:
I agree. How about "he could have gone"? I am old enough to remember when grammar mattered. Some people don't think English matters but it do.
[You am so right-Sitemonitor]
What was interesting was Mathew's cracking up and laughing , when Ford said McCain " Married into a BEER FORTUNE " . We'll Chrissy , we know what your agenda is and that is to create this mythology , that OBAMA somehow can not " connect to the middle class " and I believe that is code for WHITE AMERICA , since Barack is some kind of Hula dress wearing Indonesian that can't identify with Applebees customers (Brock) .
The hypocrite matthEws won't admit , how does the average American " connect with someone that went to Annapolis Naval Academy , oh well he graduated at the bottom of his class , so maybe there's a connection there AND married into a BEER FORTUNE, how is that a connection to middle America .
This will be the continuous theme of McCain lapdogs , some how even though you worked on the streets of Chicago with the POOR and Law enforcement , to create better living conditions for residents of that community , that's conveniently left out . Not to mention probably 75% of Harvard students are white , so maybe he over heard a little ABBA at one time , introducing him to WHITE AMERICA .
Let me get this straight. Chris says Obama's profile is not filled out because he went straight form the poorhouse to the penthouse. He stated most Americans don't know what its like to be dirt poor, they are the crowd trying to figure out how to pay the bills, to fill the car with gas, to pay the high movie costs. Chris's idea of the middle class and working class is as bad as Hillary Clinton's. She thinks the middle class makes around $200,000 a year, he thinks the working class is different from the poor. Well who the hell does he think the working class is. And thanks to the conservative policies of the past 28 years, the middle class and working class/poor are now becoming indistinguishable. It amazes me how these overpaid pundits who constantly talk about the "Working Joe", apparently don't know any. Memo to Chirs Matthews, the working class and the poor are the same people. There are people who don't work and are dirt poor, but there millions and millions who go to work everyday and are still poor. Thus is the problem with America in the year 2008 and the Conservative/Wall Street/K Street policies followed by every president since Ronald Reagan, including Bill Clinton. Chris, let me make this suggestion, take off your suit, put on some jeans, and drive around this country of ours, and lets see if you can begin to understand the economic plight of most Americans. Then maybe you can competently pontificate on the matter.
GSD
That's why Jindal won't get the position. It's a dawg and pony show.......see I can hang with the young guys.
Okay, let's stop this shall we? This isn't a freakin' English class. Anyone here who has never made any sort of spelling or grammatical mistake, please speak up. Otherwise let's not be so critical unless of course you are speaking to a troll and then by all means, fire away.
Joe, you act as if public speaking will make leader X change his mind. That is ridiculous, they get all the speaches through a translater. Leader X isn't going to hear Obama and say he is dreamy so I shouldn't bomb Israel or kill my own people in Sudan.
Persuation is not done by public speaking but by sitting across from someone and arguing your case and having them argue back with you. I think this is something President Obama would have to get much better at. When he is asked a question he does not already know in advance, he often stumbles.
That is why McCain challenged him to 10 townhalls, he wants Obama getting asked questions he does not know in advance.
I still think Obama will win though, because the American people do not want to know the real Obama. By speaking in platitudes each American can envision him to be what they want, not what he is.
You want socialism, sure he is going to do that.
You want low taxes, sure that too.
DLC
No..."could have went" is popping up all over the place. As is "I seen him..." These are too serious to let pass. After 8 years of monkey boy in The White House, unable to speak the language at all, it's time for us all to pay more attention to what we're saying and how we're saying it. If you can't use the language properly, you can't be understood.
[ http://redwing.hutman.net/%7Emreed/warriorshtm/grammarian.htm -Sitemonitor]
pissed off patricia @ 72:
I agree and I believe you are right. What the media will do is try to assist mcDough by muting any Obama responses and misrepresenting them in the worst possible light. young, stupid harold here is proof positive.
Harold Ford's stock has the same value, and is going in the same direction as the other Ford.
♠Bangkok-Bob♠ @ 73:
+fixed+
McCain knows socialism........in the government his entire life.Covered under a government paid healthcare program his entire life. I appreciate his time in service......but does this guy really understand what is going on in this country? Healthcare cost increases approximately 10%...why is the health plan congress has...good enough for him but not us.....
"Ford Has A Bettor Ideal"
BaScOmBe against Bitter Elitist Appeasement Bullshit @ 65:
+fixed+
pissed off patricia @ 80:
i concure, we needs to stawpp awll these grammer worryings and mispellings thangs.
The Narrator @ 81:
No, being a good speaker is part of being a leader and it is important in my opinion. Just listen to who Obama is often compared to: JFK, Martin Luther King Jr., etc. Those men were all powerful speakers and they used that ability to advance their ideas and in some cases, change minds.
pissed off patricia @ 81:
Me. I am perfect. I right and speak good. /snark/
mcAss has been living on the public dime since birth. there's nothing about him that makes him redeemable, least of all his service record. he showed
Dr. Hussien Matt @ 91:
OTAY.
BTW - Here's the reason Ford is kissing McCain's butt: he wants to be his VP!
Think about it - McCain can show what a "balanced, non-partisan" ticket he has by having a DINO as his VP, and Ford can hawk his DLC crap. (Oh, and don't tell anyone, but the REAL secret weapon for McCain here is: Ford is black! Just like Clarence Thomas!)
Here's my favorite story about grammatical correctness:
Winston Churchill was told by a woman that it was incorrect to end a sentence with a preposition. He replied, "You are quite correct, madam. It is something up with which we should not put!"
I like the way McCain looks around after each pronouncement to see 1) if anybody's listening, and 2) if they actually fell for that last one.
Hey come on here,
I think McCain speaking at the Pontchartrain Center in Kenner, La. was a good fit for him. Hell the combined I.Q. of the residents of Kenner is a whopping 33. Who said McCain can't perfectly target his audience?
BaScOmBe against Bitter Elitist Appeasement Bullshit @ 87:
Check the use of your in the dictionary brain boy.
No, don't bother, your just someone who come in with not to much to offer and lots to criticize.
Is Ford enough to make you car sick?
Does anyone else remember the 1984 Reagan/Mondale debates? Reagan, after he got in his "age and experience" quip in the first debate, started getting a little muddled and lost. Word in the press was that if he repeated such a sorry performance in the second (of two) debates, people would start to wonder about his mental state - he was 74 after all. Well, in the second debate he sort of muddled along. At the close, each candidate was given a couple minutes to make a closing statement. Mondale wrapped up and Reagan started talking and got off on some story about driving along the coast of California, his eyes growning more unfocused and confused as he went along. The moderator jumped in with a "Thank You, Mr. President" and it was mercifully over. I thought "Wow, Reagan is losing his mind!" But the next day the paper was full of "Reagan strong in second debate!". I had to wonder what they had seen that I hadn't.
But to the point - The MSM is even more pro-Republican now than it was then. McCain could probably get away with asking for a change of Depends in the middle of a question, and the editorials the next day would be praising his ability to set priorities.
We can't rely on the Republicans to implode, we have to work to defeat them.
casper46 @ 71:
What about commercials for the movies or the inevitable talk-show round to plug it?
Dr. Phil could use a few plugs.
casper46 @ 1:
How about: Once your name is Chris Matthews, you are not allowed to be on TV.
I know this thread is about Ford, but, let me see if I understand something.
Going from rags to riches by working hard and studying hard at the toughest schools in the country, and paying off student loans while doing community organizing is something the average "struggling" American simply can't relate to, even in their dreams and aspirations.
On the other hand, being born on an overseas military base, botching a mission once in the military, spending five years being tortured as a prisoner of war, only to come home, divorce your wife in her hour of need in order to marry a wealthy-beyond-your-wildest-dreams beer heiress and spend the rest of your life being coddles as a high-powered Washington politician makes you know how to "sweat" a paycheck like the average folk.
Do I have that right, Chris?
I agree with Ford, it was his most powerful ever. Step back for a second and look at what Ford said - that the speech was McCains most powerful speech ever. He didn't say it was good, or better, than any speech anyone else made - he said it was McCains most powerful ever. He pretty much just said that McCains most powerful speech sucks.
♠Bangkok-Bob♠ @ 99:
Sorry, ♠Bangkok-Bob♠, but your use of your does not conform to standard grammar. "Your" is the possessive version of "you." "You're" is a contraction of "you are."
MikeinMD @ 101:
I remember that clearly. Mondale also had a responce to Reagan's "There you go again" he tried to trot out in an attempt to get a cheap laugh out of the audience. Mondale's answer left A very heavily made up Reagan looking pale and disoriented. I thought Mondale won the debate. But the MSM had already made up their mind who was going to win the election, so all the articles raved about Reagan's performance. They already had their scripts written and they weren't about to let something like the actual event itself take them off that script.
Ford's political views almost make me glad that he did not get elected to the senate.
I get the feeling that Harold Ford merely read the text of InSane's speech instead of actually watching the doddering fool deliver it.
And someone probably just told him that InSane stood in front of a green background in front of the wholly derivative "A Leader We Can Believe In."
By the way, Harold, I thought green signified either environmentally friendly, youthful and inexperienced, or envious. Considering that InSane essentially stole Obama's slogan, appeared disoriented and ready to drool on himself, and offered nothing in the way of policies besides tempered versions of Obama's proposals, I'd say the green signified envy.
Forward looking, my ass. How can Ford say that in the same breath as he notes that InSane needs to "resurrect" the maverick image he so readily and happily trashed to reach out to right wing whack jobs?
Karen @ 105:
...and that was also true in days of yore....
Harold is a long time Clintonite crony. He's in the bag for her. You only listen to him for signals from the Clinton camp.
Harold Ford comes across like the Dan Quayle of the democratic party.
MikeinMD @ 101:
Yeah, I remember. what I remember is that if you were a Democrat and running against Reagan, you were fucked. here in America, the question that need to be answered is "how the fuck did we drop so low in matters of political integrity to vote Reagan in in the first place and how did he manage to get re-elected in the second place" (knowing that we were putting a moron in as the president). Everything beyond the time of Reagan is a nightmare. I'm so stupid that I didn't know that Ford was the chairman of the DLC. I actually listened to him with respect for what he had to say. What a schmuck I am! Fuck Tweety. you can see where he was going with regards to Obama and all I can think is "fuck you Tweety". I get where you're going with this. In the face of a President that was born into rich elitism, and all the arrogance associated with being a rich elite fuck who hasn't a clue, I think that the line of Tweety's questioning is corrupt and specious.
Harold should change his last name to Lieberman.
my conclusion: none of the liberal or democratic pundits or possibly even the dem or liberal candidates is either bright enough or gutsy enough to take on the best talkers that the right wing has to offer. These conservatives deal in lies and innuendos and they are seldom if ever called on it. I've only seen one recently who calmly took all the crap that o'reilley had to offer and then he calmly and factually stuck it back in his face. Of course, i'm not speaking of a democrat or liberal, not yet anyway, but rather i speak of Scott McClelland. When he was the frontal liar for Bush, he spoke with eloquence that in essence had one scratching his head, wondering if he indeed was speaking the truth. Now he picks up that same factual eloquence and disposes calmly of one of the right wing's biggest blowhards.
If there are more scott mcclelands on that side, the left needs to be aware. Tony Snow also does a great job of making jibberish sound like cold, hard truth. I wonder how long before his tell-all book will be out. I only wonder did they sell their moral compasses for wealth. Whatever, I still think McClelland can take on the best they have to offer and clean house with them. The only one on the left who comes close is Joe Wilson. I think though before he was screwed by the admin over the outing of his wife, he too was a republican. I could be wrong on that though. please correct me if i am incorrect. sorry for the rambling but these are truly exciting times. It's like a GD'd coming out party.
Oh fer X's sake. Does everyone in here have a broken sarcasm detector? EVer hear of a left handed campliment? Sheesh.
in that second picture, harold sure looks like he's happy to have licked chrissie's bottom.
backwoods @ 112:
golden parachutes, platinum handcuffs and audiences with the powerful are what drives these pissants.
The secret to a winning campaign - a simple message. In 1980, it was Carter's malaise. In 1984, it was "Morning in America". I still don't know what Reagan's first term had to do with soaring music, people getting married, and flag raising (none of that was done before 1980?) but it was very moving emotionally. Push the Republicans as the party of war, death and debt. Make the Bush albatross glow with neon paint when you hang it around McCain's neck and don't let it fade. McCain will go with more tax cuts and patriotism, support the troops (i.e., the military option) and if the Democrats go with something too hard to absorb in 10 seconds they will risk condemning us to a neocon dominated Supreme Court for the next 30 years.
Why would a black man from the south be a Dixiecrat in the first damn place?
That man is confused, but after I saw he voted in favor of the Military Commissions Act I knew he was a poser
huh; i saw that clip and thought ford was being pretty sarcastic. i mean, i did not see mccain's speech, but it well could have been his best speech ever. mccain has never given a really good speech, ever. so the comment could well have been sarcastic. sounded like it to me.
This is why I cant stand Harold Ford.
He's one of those "carefull" Democrats. Want to be carefull not to upset the right wing.
I he'd ran as a real Democrat he actually would've beat Corker in that Senate race in Tenn..
Harold Ford is right; it was a really good speech by McCain, as far as McCain speeches go. Fox News is also right; that speech was total shit. If we put them together, we can say that this speech is a long, dry, well-formed turd, a really good stool, but still feces.
I think it's a fair comparison. (:
Ford is quickly learning how to survive in the pundit ranks. Any lberal who qualifies for a job at Faux News has to be "malleable".
Login or Register to post comments.