Market Reflects Economic Instability
By Nicole Belle Sunday Sep 21, 2008 6:00pm
Download | play
Download | play (h/t Dave)
The roller coaster continues. Clearly angry with bailout plans for corporations with little oversight or consideration for individuals and the news that Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs are getting out of the investment game for more traditional bank holding companies, the stock market fluctuated wildly, completely obliterating any gains from Friday, closing 371 points down:
Volatility again swept the financial markets Monday as investors grew nervous about an amorphous government plan to buy $700 billion in banks' mortgage debt. Stocks fell sharply, taking the Dow Jones industrials down more than 370 points, while investors sought safety in hard assets such as gold and oil, which at one point shot up more than $25 a barrel.
Crude oil finally closed after much volatility up more than $16/barrel, the largest single-day gain since 1984. And don't think it's stopping. Republican oil man Matt Simmons says he wouldn't be surprised to see $500/barrel oil sooner than you realize.
While John "The economy is fundamentally strong" McCain backpedals, calling this the biggest crisis since WWII, Democrats have worked to get some consumer protections in the bailout terms.
Investors were uncertain just how successful the administration's plan will be in unfreezing credit markets, which many businesses depend on to fund day-to-day operations, and for propping up the still-weak housing market.
Congressional aides said the House could act on a bailout bill as early as Wednesday.
Bush said, "Obviously, there will be differences over some details, and we will have to work through them. That is an understandable part of the policy making process." But he also said, "It would not be understandable if members of Congress sought to use this emergency legislation to pass unrelated provisions, or to insist on provisions that would undermine the effectiveness of the plan."
The proposal that Dodd sent to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson would let judges modify the mortgages of homeowners in bankruptcy to allow them to keep their homes.
It also would require that the government come up with "a systematic approach for preventing foreclosure" on the mortgages it acquires as part of the bailout. That would include the home loans held by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the troubled mortgage giants now under the control of a government regulator.
Feel more secure? Me neither. Prepare for more volatility this week.









Login or Register to post comments.
capitalism has failed, period.
Couldn't happen to a nicer country.
Since Paulson already openly admitted that he doesn't even know if this will work, I am led to believe that no one knows what the hell they are talking about or what the hell to really do.
This is uncharted territory and out of the blue, they deem they need a remedy within like 72 hours.
euthyfro @ 1:
So when do we get socialized medicine?
I hope this volatility doesn't make the Dems cave on the bail out bill. Signing off on the largest redistribution of wealth in our nation's history would much worse than all the other things they've caved on in the past 7+ years.
Let Wall Street shake a little. No one considered this a crisis when it was just the average American in financial ruin. Why should we suddenly be concerned the rich are having troubles now.
The great thing about being broke is no matter how much the economy sucks, you're still broke.
Insightful commentary as always, Wolfie.. "like a roller coaster it goes up, it goes down.."
Jeezus - I take one day off to chill and enjoy early fall and boom.. oil plus $16 a barrel, and Dow down 371 points. I'd ask to see the manager of this Wall Street establishment thing, but I have a feeling the position is currently open, or they have a chimp working a crack machine as an interim.
joe6pack @ 6:
Deep.
So, where can I meet some of these Snorg girls? ;)
Jo @ 4:
As soon as the rich can't afford health care.
Flashback: Ron Paul on the Coming Economic Collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCt2yRqlCcQ
Originally posted on YouTube, February 04, 2008.
We (the Marxists) had been calling this the era of Capitalism's senile decay, last week saw the opening of The Weekend at Bernie's era of Capitalism.
Everyone knows it's dead & over but most will be fooling themselves into believing it can be "fixed" for a little while longer.
Stupid Git @ 10:
I knew there was a catch somewhere.
Could it really be that the market is unstable without 700b!? Watch the banks rally after congress passes the blank check to the POTUS to sign. And as usual the Dems will pass with minimal provisions because they're scared of losing seats in November if they don't act soon.
Wait wait. Is it 1929????
Dave
Viet Vet
Jo @ 4:
Just tear my medical bills up and toss them in the trash then healthcare is free.
idleuser @ 14:
Exactly.
Notice how no one would even consider pumping $700bn into paying off these bad loans so that American's can keep their homes. Can't let that happen because "We The People" would still have assets and wouldn't be the total servant class they are hoping for.
We R toast.
"All of the perplexities, confusion, and distress in America arises, not from the defects of the Constitution or Confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation." -- John Adams
Investigate the Federal Reserve System.
The Federal Reserve Act was enacted in 1913 on Dec. 23 while most members of Congress were on Christmas Break...
Here's what a plan for the people looks like:
http://backbonecampaign.org/storydetail.cfm?id=237
Rush to decision on this? HELL NO
Trust the Bush administration? HELL NO
All of Bush's appointments have been failures. Trust Paulson on this? HELL NO
This is pre-emptive action they are talking about. Stop this fascist takeover of our money.
THIS IS PRE EMPTIVE FINANCIAL WAR ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
If you have never called your Congress, now is the time more than ever to do so. Tell them you will actively campaign against them, if they approve such a bailout with no oversight, prevents CEO's from running away with the profits, and doesn't give the taxpayers any equity for bailing their ases out.
Naomi Klein short article
http://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/09/free-market-ideology-far-fini...
McCain is calling this the biggest crisis since WWII. Shouldn't he be calling this the worst crisis since the Georgia/Russia crisis?? (just a few weeks ago)
A few weeks ago, he called the Georgia crisis the same, the worst (international - as if the current financial one is not international..!) crisis since WWII.
Watch my words - he'll call the up-coming election the most contentious since WWII. Don't mind me, I wasn't born yet then, nor do I know about US elections back then (does McCain??) but I'm sure it'll come up!! ('Never has so much been at stake!!!)
A terrible situation is if the incompetence of the Bush Administration has put our economic system at risk. An even worse scenerio is if these top business men purposely let this disaster happen to gobble up our treasure and bring in new legislation that ensures their power grab continues well into the future. A Shock Doctrine of the highest degree so to say. We'll see.
Orangutan. @ 11:
paul came late to the game
thom hartman, bernie ward and kucinich had been warning about the crash for years, and connecting it (as klein has) to the greater attempt to rip apart every new deal program
just wait...we will be told that both medicare and the social security system are indeed bankrupt
this was the reagan plan
from the grave he spits on us all
Everyone here says, fuck the system, I've got my own.
Which is what the evil fucks want you to believe.
That you're OK. That you've got your own.
While they loot the country.
While Obama stands by. Because he wants to be prez.
So many shoes are poised to drop this week that the American scene might be confused for the world's greatest-ever clog dancing festival, but a closer look will reveal a circle of cavorting skeletons.
The fact that Bush,co. wants this passed QUICKLY, makes me highly suspicious.
Naomi Klein, where are you?
$700 Billion Bailout Plan Would Give Paulson Dictatorial Powers, Which CAN’T Be Reviewed by the Courts
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aZ2aFDx8_idM&refer=home
Welcome to the final stages of the coup…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larisa-alexandrovna/welcome-to-the-final-s...
We Have DAYS To Stop the $700 Billion Stick-Up (and Fascist Power Grab)
http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/09/we-have-days-to-stop-700-b...
moonsha @ 21:
you know the dems are sitting on their fat asses....right?
Stupid Git @ 17:
Why are these loans bad exactly? No one ever comments on that. The loans aren't bad, per se; the problem is that people had no ownership whatsoever in the homes they purchased, no pride of ownership and immorally felt it was okay to walk away from their debts rather than pay their bills.
I agree that the $700bn should have been used to help people refinance their debt, but there are tons of people out there who simply wanted to walk away when the value of their loan exceeded the value of their home (negative equity). That is a major part of this problem: short-sales.
i highly recommend driftglass' take on this. go read the whole thing but here's a small clip.
http://driftglass.blogspot.com/
Orangutan. @ 23:
With this bailout they will "win". It is nothing but a blatant wealth transfer from the unwashed masses to the rich.
We have no more assets, we have no more voice. We are a second class citizenry in a failed Democracy.
Ha!! While OBAMA stands by???!!!!
How about, while MCCAIN made it all happen!!!!
His campaign manager was being paid $30,000 A MONTH to basically do nothing and just be close the Senator McCain who was/is running for president. It's McCain and his people who are looting this country!
But yeah, sure, Obama is standing by???? He's the only one with a coherent economic policy.
I don't know where you're at VietVet - my guess is kinda sorta Alaska.
That pageant of happy idiocy is now ending.
Uncle Joe Mccarthy @ 29:
In many ways, this election is about how we get our groove back as a country. We have been living on borrowed time and borrowed dimes. President Bush has nothing to offer anymore. So that leaves us with Barack Obama and John McCain. Neither has wowed me with his reaction to the market turmoil. In fairness, though, neither man has any levers of power to pull. But what could they say that would give you confidence that they could lead us out of this rut? My test is simple: Which guy can tell people what they don’t want to hear — especially his own base. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/opinion/21friedman.html?em
Why should either party, Democrats or Republicans, act rashly. This is serious stuff. It requires some thought and planning, not knee-jerk, shock doctrine, shoot from the hit, reaction.
Vote Dem or Repub, whatever your choice.
Good luck to you.
Orangutan. @ 19:
"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country.
A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit.
Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation,
therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men.
We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely
controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world.
No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by
conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by
the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." - Woodrow Wilson, 1916 (In reference to signing the Federal Reserve Act in 1913).
CMINCA @ 30:
Actually it is because some people lost jobs because of outsourcing and a bad economy. Other foreclosures happened because banks said no too renegotiating the terms. I wish everyone would quit blaming the victim.
This the result of a consumer culture of instant gratification.
Bailout. The idea is to dump the losses on people who had the good sense or sufficient control of their greed to avoid overextending themselves to begin with.
CMINCA @ 30:
...
i take issue with your statement that "the problem is that people had no ownership" blah blah blah.
do you really believe that "short sales" comprises the majority of the foreclosures, that people "simply wanted to walk away"?
i consider my "ownership" of my home to be extremely shaky at this point. and indeed, when my finances are no longer capable of floating this boat, i will "simply ... walk away," but please do not insult me and the millions of other americans like me by saying that we wanted any of this nightmare.
One can look backward.
At today.
Or Forward.
If I wanted to make money, I'd look today and forward.
I'd bet on war. Uncertainty.
VietVet8666 @ 35:
I'm willing to guess that it's going to take a genuinely brutal collapse, one in which our citizens cannot get even the most basic necessities of life before the spell of American exceptionalism (ego trip) is broken.
Biggest con game in the history of the world and stupid Americans fall for it. You would think after the past eight years of lies we would be a little skeptical of their bullshit.
CMINCA @ 38:
And complete reliance (learned helplessness) upon unseen "people in high places" who somehow know what is best for the rest of us, and belief these people will act first in our interests instead of their own.
McCain the Liar @ 43:
There are some Americans who do get it. But, there are those who don't have a clue and revel in that notion. The problem here is that the ones who don't have clue are making policy changes difficult. My question, is how do we even push the idea of change past the people who want to keep their heads in the sand?
Ron @ 37:
I'm not blaming the "victim" and understand your point, but what you are referring to is a very minute portion of these short-sales and foreclosures. I've studied this extensively, dreading the inevitable results. I know realtors who warned clients not to get into deals they couldn't afford only to be told to STFU. The Bush Administration and the MSM created a panic where people felt forced to buy or they were "going to miss out on the American Dream". People for the first time in history felt it was okay to use the equity in their homes as an ATM machine. It is an incredible pheonomenon and one with dire consequences that people are only realizing have widespread consequences. Greed by lenders, mortgage brokers, Wall Street, coupled with Americans' need to live large and beyond their means, instant gratification, image, the moral failure to accept responsibility for one's actions and decisions created this mess. It was a marriage made in Hell. The blame lies squarely on everyone involved in each of these deals.
L.A. Confidential @ 42:
You are, of course, correct.
Predictable: The talk Nafeez Ahmed did last November used this text to advertise it...
"2007: global food shortages cause riots (FAO)
2008: global banking collapse (Arlington Institute)
2011: world oil reserves critically depleted (Independent)
2015: climate change point-of-no-return (Guardian)
2025: two-thirds of world in water shortage (BBC)
2100: Earth uninhabitable (UN)
Are you concerned by these alarming trends? Are they unavoidable? Or can we exercise awareness and skill to deal with them?
Nafeez will discuss the global political economy, ideology, culture and value-system underlying these crises. He will bring together key developments in science, philosophy, and economics, along with groundbreaking activism from the global social justice movement, to show not only that "another world is possible", but that it's already in the making."
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7800392480175286301&hl=en
The crisis of the planet Earth is so profound that all of our lives will be caught up in it.
"Another world is not only possible, she is on her way. On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing." - Arundhati Roy, Porto Alegre, Brazil, Jan 27 2003
CMINCA @ 46:
I know because I was one that told my clients what they should do and most listened. Some didn't but, they are not the majority.
CMINCA @ 30:
Do you need me to explain why these loans are bad? If you feel so strongly about it you may want to try and understand the issue you are commenting about.
They are bad because they consisted of blatantly unfair terms packaged to uninformed borrowers in misleading ways with the full knowledge that they probably wouldn't be able to pay it back. These loans were given out by people who made a commission off the loan, not the payments. If you want to fault the borrowers that's fine but mind that the only reason I was aware is because my sister is a realator and explained these loans to me a few years back as a warning to avoid them. Most borrowers aren't ivy league finance grads capable of understanding the fine print of these contracts. Add to that, the Bankruptcy Bill from a few years back which was passed specifically to prevent borrowers from "walking away" from their debts as you put it and it not only highlights the industry and our governments awareness of this issue well in advance but implicates them in their compliancy of allowing it to happen. Now that it's affecting their pocketbook it's a crisis though.
Does that explain it enough? If not, try some research.
VietVet8666 @ 47:
I suppose the lines at the cattle calls for American Idol will be stretching for 20 miles.
All those "Golden Parachutes" for the banking execs as they slip away to their mansions and the worker bees are left out to dry and cope with the aftermath of this economic meltdown of the global economy.
Free Marketeers at their best, everybody for themselves! Grab what money you can as you run off the sinking ship. I just can't shake the feeling that this little bubble has sunk the country into depression. And I don't me your mental health.
One thing is for sure; no matter how bad things get, the Wall St scumsuckers will find a way to profit on the ruin of everybody else.
We don't have to sweat out Al Quida. Amerika is destroying itself from within.
if we are going to see $500/barrel oil, then you can bet that
the traders on wall st are speculating to push it's price up
to get back at any attempt to make them responsible for
the fiasco we are now in.
we have greedy bastard babies who can't get their
mommies to hold them, so they just want to FUCK EVERYONE
to get their way.
karen marie @ 40:
To begin with, a short-sale and a foreclosure are not the same thing. A short-sale occurs when the sale price of a home is less than the mortgage. The seller may or may not be in default. The bank does not yet own the home, but the bank becomes a party in the real estate transaction and must approve of any buyer's offer. A short-sale does not necessarily forgive the remaining debt. This is important, because most people believe that their short-sale end the lender-borrower transaction. That may not be the case. If it does end the transaction, whatever the difference between the short-sale and the mortgage is considered debt forgiveness and is TAXABLE INCOME TO THE BORROWER.
A foreclosure occurs when the mortgage is in default and a series of things occur. The bank ends up owning the property. The sale price of a resulting foreclosure may not be less than the mortgage and would not be considered a short-sale in that case.
I'm very sorry for your situation. I would not wish any type of financial insecurity on anyone. I hope you will seek out proper advise from a real estate attorney and/or CPA so that you can make an informed decision. I wish you the best of luck.
LibertyWatch @ 52:
I don't know about anyone else, but it is quite amazing that the Bush 43 presidency has employed the worst of the 20th century (war, depression, civil rights abuses, revising the Cold War) and put a new Millenium spin on it. The ugliest thing is that Bush has made all of these things an art form.
The man is certainly a sadist to the nth degree to unleash the hounds of hell upon the American people.
Bush said, “Obviously, there will be differences over some details, and we will have to work through them. That is an understandable part of the policy making process.”
Maybe the simian warmonger could call the Brits and Israel's intelligence gatherers to help him in his decision-making. Worked before.
Ron @ 49:
I also told my client what to do, but they were "betting" on the increase in equity. I always found that to be an interesting term, betting, but that is the term they used and they were correct. It was and is a casino. There are entire newly built communities here that are littered with for sales signs. I know Country Wide cannot keep up with the short-sales and they are months behind. I was frightened then and I am more frightened now, because on top of everything else, Americans seem to be lemmings that spook easily and will run off the end of the cliff with the first quick fix that comes along. This situation is not a quick fix.
The only reason it's not down below 10000 now is because they took AIG and others off the DOW Index.
Karen Marie@31;
Well dang! Read the driftglass post you provided a link for...
It was like this poster jumped inside my head... I am in agreement with this posters perspective on this shitstorm............JD
I heard they played this for the closing bell today:
How the markets got to this point.. (funny, and serious...)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwRFoxgEcHc
*From an English Perspective
we all need to just mail ALL OUR BILLS
to bush/cheney and say
"here, pay these or else, we stop paying taxes"!!!
Closing bell
The easier credit is to obtain, the more likely it is that credit will filter towards something wasteful. From 200-2006 it was embarrassingly easy to get large amounts of credit for just about anyone with a U.S. Social security number. That's why most of the blame for this entire debacle falls at the feet of Alan Greenspan. He's about 90% responsible for discounting credit to a completely unjustified level.
It's no accident that private households and government both started making bad borrowing decisions in parallel. While the government borrowed to expand counter-productive prescription drug coverage and a counter-productive iraq war, U.S. households borrowed to buy bigger houses and thereby increase their energy consumption. The net "investments" (i.e. foreign credit) had a negative return. Had households and government spent the borrowed money on productive or at least non-negative investments, there would be no crisis today. Easy credit is like crack, it doesn't do the economy good.
Strange bedfellows - I'm listening to Newt Gingrich explain why the bailout is such a bad idea. Progressives and true conservatives on one side, corporatists (of both colors) on the other?
Stupid Git @ 50:
Try getting a degree in this field and working in the industry for 25 years. Other than that STFU. Read my other posts and stop whinging.
I am against the bail-out. Private corporations made lousy business decisions. The top people made millions, everyone else gets screwed. Let the companies fail. The few that made millions will need to watch their backs as I am sure things will happen, laws will change, and they will be hunted down and dealt with. We The People need to send a message. The message needs to be, steal from us and you die.....
Uppity Blue Lensman @ 66:
Long have we been ripe for true Class Warfare. The opening shots have been fired, that much is now definitely clear to all but the most dense of participants.
As a progressive Democrat, it infuriates me to hear victim mentality and sentimentality in response to this collapse in our markets. I see some educated responses here, I read many educated responses in various publications and I hear a great deal of people calling for more thought and planning before actions. Every person that was involved in these subprime loans is co-responsible for what is happening in America. To claim that people didn't understand what they were getting into is NO EXCUSE or a lame excuse at best. Making a purchase of this magnitude DEMANDS that you know what the Hell you are doing. Educate yourself, talk to your banker (its free) or buy one hour of a CPA's time. Read a fuck*** book. And when your CPA, banker or realtor tells you cannot afford this, don't ignore them. Don't tell them that you simply have to have this or you never will or that you just know in your heart that your equity in that home will increase, before it is time to refinance, even though you've been warned you cannot afford your current mortage payment. When they tell you NOT to refinance, don't tell them you need a new car or your old furniture is too shabby for the new house. I've heard all the stories, a million times over and I've pulled my hair out and wrung my hands.
The me-first, instant gratification, living beyond my own means group has caused this mess, along with lots and lots of greedy and amoral financial wizards. The rest of us simply have to go along for the rollercoaster ride through the gates of Hell. Thanks a bunch.
I'm outta here.
Uppity Blue Lensman @ 66:
A bailout may be the option that has more intellectual integrity but you can't ignore the hypothetical of what would really happen in the case that no life line is given. You would probably have a severe bank run and a real panic. Panic creates massive uncertainty an extreme volatility, and I'm not just refering to financial markets. Remember the U.S. government took this approach from 1929-1932. It didn't work out so great. We were extremely lucky to hang on to democracy and the U.S. way of life. We can thank FDR for that.
Dirty Secret Of The Bailout: Thirty-Two Words That None Dare Utter
"DECISIONS BY THE SECRETARY... ARE NON-REVIEWABLE ... AND MAY NOT BE
REVIEWED BY ANY COURT OF LAW OR ANY ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY"
..." one cannot overstate this: Section 8 is a singularly transformative sentence of economic policy. It transfers a significant amount of power to the Executive Branch, while walling off any avenue for oversight, and offering no guarantees in return. And if the Democrats end up content with winning a few slight concessions, they risk not putting a stop-payment on the real "blank check" - the one in which they allow the erosion of their own powers.
Over in the Senate, Christopher Dodd has proposed a bailout legislation of his own, which critically calls for "an oversight board that not only includes the chairman of the Federal Reserve and the SEC, but congressionally appointed, non-governmental officials" and would require the President to appoint an "independent inspector general to investigate the Treasury asset program." In Dodd's legislation, Section 8 is effectively stripped from the bill.
Nevertheless, the fact that Section 8 of the Paulson plan seems to strike few as a de facto dealbreaker can and should astound. The failure of Congress to hold the line on this point would be truly embarrassing. But if we make it through this week with nobody in the press specifically informing the public about the implications of this single sentence - in the middle of a complicated bill, in the middle of a complicated time - then right there, you have the single largest media failure of this year."
A DICTATOR is made overnight, with Dems compliance.
The 'market's reaction ? Would love it, so 'stable' !! Just as they loved Hitler, Mussolini, and Generallissimo Franco - great for Big Business. Never mind the people.
Uppity Blue Lensman @ 66:
Now your comin around!
Take off the blue lenses...look around!
(I know I'm seeing alot better since I got rid of mine...)
however, continue to maintain thine liberalness!
the powers that be have double agents...Lieberman is obvious...others not so much.
Vote no on the Wall Street bailout plan! Those greedy Wall Street Criminals need to be charged with treason for putting our national security at risk! They are blackmailing America! They are stealing America's wealth! You can't let them get away with this! Don't bail them out, seize them and their assets, then charge them with treasonous conspiracy to destroy America's economy!
History Lesson:
"The refusal of king George III to allow the colonies to operate an honest money system, which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators was probably the prime cause of the revolution." Benjamin Frandanklin, Founding Father.
Our country sought escape from this during the American Revolutionary war!
“All of the perplexities, confusion, and distress in America arises, not from the defects of the Constitution or Confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit circulation.” — John Adams
The Federal Reserve has the power to regulate the money supply and it's value, which gives it the power to bring entire economies to it's knees.
"Give me control of a nation's money supply and I care not who makes it's laws." -- Mayer Amschel Rothschild, Founder of Rothschild Banking Dynasty.
The Federal Reserve is a private corporation. It makes it's own policies and is under no regulation by the government. It is a private bank that loans all the currency, at interest, to the government.
"The real truth of the matter is that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government since the days of Andrew Jackson." Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1933
That's right, Andrew Jackson killed the Central BANK currently known as The Federal Reserve, but banking cartel came back when Woodrow Wilson took office. Look it up, maybe we can figure a way out of this freaking mess!
The central bank, or Federal Reserve, does not simply supply the governments money, it loans it at interest.
The central bank, or Federal Reserve, regulates the value of the currency being issued.
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous than standing armies ... if the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of currency ... the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of their property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." -- Thomas Jefferson
"If you want to remain slaves of the bankers and pay for the costs of your own slavery, let them continue to create money and control the nations credit." -- Sir Josiah Stamp, 1880-1941
Dominate Banking Families:
J.D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, Paul Warburg, Baron Rothschild.
"The Morgan interests took advantage ... to precipitate the panic [of 1907] guiding it shrewdly as it progressed." -- Fredrik Allen, Life Magazine.
Congressional investigation, lead by Nelson Aldrich, who had intimate ties to the banking cartels and later became part of the Rockefeller family through marriage. The Commission, lead by Aldrich, recommended a central bank be implemented, so a panic like 1907 could never happen again.
The Federal Reserve ACT was written by bankers. Woodrow Wilson promised to sign it into law in return for campaign support. Later Woodrow Wilson wrote in regret, "[Our] Great Industrial Nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men ... who necessarily, by very reason of their own limitations, chill and check and destroy genuine economic freedom. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No government by free opinion. No longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominate men."
Congressman Louis McFadden expressed the truth after the passage of the bill, "A world banking system was being set up here ... a superstate controlled by international bankers ... acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure. The Fed has usurped the government."
From 1914-1919, The Federal Reserve increased the money supply by nearly 100%, resulting in extensive loans to small banks and the public. Then, in 1920, the FED called in mass percentages of the outstanding money supply, thus requiring the supporting banks to call in huge numbers of loans and just like 1907, bank runs, bankruptcy and collapse occurred. 5400 Banks went down.
Congressman Charles Lindbergh stepped up in 1921 and said, "Under the Federal Reserve Act, panics are scientifically created. The present of panic is the first scientifically created one, worked out as we figure a mathematical equation." That was just a warm-up.
From 1921-1929, the FED increased the money supply by 62%, resulting once again in extensive loans to the public and banks. The new type of loan was called a "margin loan" in the stock market. 10% down gets 100% control of the stock. The catch was at any time the loan could be called in. A 24 hour margin call could occur at any time.
A few months before October 1929, J.D. Rockefeller and other insiders quietly exited the market. Then on October 24th 1929, the New York financiers who furnished the margin loans started calling them in, in mass. Instantaneous massive sell off in market, everyone had to cover the margin loans. It then triggered mass bank runs for the same reason, callapsing 16 thousand banks, enabling conspiring international bankers to not only buy up rival banks at a discount, but to also buy up whole corporations at pennies on the dollar. It was the greatest robbery in American history. Rather than expanding the money supply to recover from this economic collapse, the FED actually contracted it, fueling one of the largest depressions in history.
Once again outraged, Congressman Louis McFadden, a long time opponent of banking cartels, began bringing impeachment proceedings against the Federal Reserve Board. Saying of the crash and depression, "It was a carefully contrived occurrance. International bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair, so that they might emerge the rulers of us all." Not surprisingly, after two assassination attempts, McFadden was poisoned at a banquet before he could push for impeachment.
“The government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of government, but it is the government’s greatest creative opportunity. The financing of all public enterprise, and the conduct of the treasury will become matters of practical administration. Money will cease to be master and will then become servant of humanity.” -- Abraham Lincoln
Nearly all the illegal income tax goes to the FED to pay interest on the fraudulently produced currency! "If you ... examined [the 16th Amendment] carefully, you would find that a sufficient number of states never ratified that amendment." -- U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox 2003.
There is no law in existence that requires you to pay the federal income tax. period.
“It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.” — Henry Ford
The next tool for profit and control is WAR! WWI, WWII, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan.
WWI: "The large banking interests were deeply interested in the world war, because of the wide opportunities for large profits." -- William Jennings Bryan, Secretary of State.
The most lucrative opportunity of the banking cartels is war, for it forces the country to borrow even more money from the Federal Reserve, at interest.
Woodrow Wilson's top advisor and mentor was Colonel Edward House, a man with intimate connections with international bankers, who wanted in the war.
In a documented conversation between Colonel House and Sir Edward Grey, foreign secretary of england, regarding how to get america in the war:
Sir Edward Grey, "What will Americans do if Germans sink an ocean liner with american passengers on board?"
Colonel House, " I believe that a flame of indignation would sweep the United States and that by itself would be sufficient to carry us into war."
I bet you can connect nearly all wars to the greedy bankers on Wall Street. They make double money because they loan money to both sides! They supply materials to both sides!!
All the Federal Reserve and the Banking Cartel on Wall Street has given us is perpetual debt and wars!!!
VietVet8666 @ 36:
Or don't vote at all and hope they all get their feelings hurt and go away?
VietVet8666 @ 25:
i am now sure exactly where your head is
and it must be dark and stinky.
we are in an election year, what do you want? for obama
to walk alway and let mcfuckhead and ms lipshits just have
the country and the election? you are a real piece of work.
dadams @ 65:
stop the occupation of Iraq/Afghanistan or I quit
stop the phone tapping or I quit
stop the torture or I quit
gimme habeus corpus or I quit
repeal the patriot act or I quit
repeal HR 1955 or I quit
I actually already quit...
No anwers no taxes
http://www.wethepeoplecongress.org/
Record increase in oil prices today. Caught the pump at $3.29 and topped off today.
As far as the market is concerned, this is the first manifestation that I've noticed in the market that deficits will eventually produce inflation. People in this country just don't learn. We heard during the Nasdaq run up that earning and revenues don't matter, because it's a new economy. That's nonsense. And during the last 8 years, we heard that federal deficits don't matter, and that's nonsense. I heard that myself from that bastion of truth, Dick Cheney, who, as I understand, has invested in TIPS (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities) and bonds denominated in foreign currency.
So, how did we get here? The corporate media would like to obfuscate it, but I'll take a stab at it. In Feburary, 2004, Alan Greenspan uttered "American consumers might benefit if lenders provided greater mortgage product alternatives to the traditional fixed-rate mortgage." We got these sub-prime mortgages that got bundled into securities, and these securities were wrongly graded AAA so that they could be sold for more than they were worth. (I think a crime may have occurred here, a scheme to defraud investors). And the administration ran up the deficits so aggressively that we're not going to take this hit without pain. If we had Clinton's balanced budgets, we could take this hit.
What I don't quite understand yet is the impact that derivatives played in this. Leveraged purchases of stock played a part in the 1929 crash, leading to limits on margin. I suspect that a more sophisticated leverage scheme utilizing "credit default swaps" have undermined the markets. That might be part of the AIG malaise.
Meanwhile, I saw on 60 minutes, a tax cut ideologue in John McCain. While Obama's tax cut is revenue neutral, McCain will drive up the deficits further. He just stammered when asked about the deficits. I hate to burst people's bubble, but we're not going to be able to spend a dollar that we're not taking in indefinitely by borrowing. The foreigners aren't going to lend forever to a sub-prime debtor nation that looks like its only option to pay back the loans is to print money like a banana republic. And these foreigners are going to be thinking the exact same thing the market was thinking today.
David Sirota has the best bail plan
http://www.credoaction.com/sirota/
NoBuddy @ 79:
It's hard for people to understand that money today is based on debt and not value. Inflation will eventually occur but not right now. People are not going to be running around with wheelbarrows of cash anytime soon. Deleveraging all the derivatives is creating a cash black hole. When money is based on debt, you only have as much "cash" as you have out on loan. Therefore when you write off loans, you effectively take cash out of the system. The Fed has no choice but to reflate by injecting massive amounts of cash into the system ($700 billion give or take), otherwise you get what happened in the great depression - a massive shortage of cash.
The reflation completely changes the governement balance sheet however. Both Obama and McCain's propsals are out the window. Much more of U.S. government revenue will now have to service debt. The next 5 years includes extremely painful spending choices no President will have faced since FDR. Be assured that a good portion of the debt will eventually be paid off in the form of inflation. People need to come to terms with this and plan accordindly.
unfrozencaveman @ 81:
Since we're spending 1 out of 2 dollars spent on the military, that spending would be on my short list. Reigniting Cold War II is idiotic. Why is independence such a bad idea when it's the breakaway provinces in Georgia, and such a great idea when it's the Alaskan Independence Party? We have got to stop playing the world's policeman.
We need to reform the cost structure of health care by instituting single payer health care. We don't need to reinvent the wheel, simply find a system out there that works, and copy it.
And then we need to take a look at Free Trade. The results of that is that we borrow from abroad to buy from abroad. America should have never given up being self-sufficient. And there's a range of people from Pat Buchannan to Dennis Kucinich (my choice) that know that.
CBC Newsworld had a great documentary on this last night. I'm not sure if there is a link available, but it is required viewing in my opinion. They refer to this crisis as the biggest pyramid scheme, money grab in modern history, and back it up with facts. Americans, don't let your government steal your hard earned cash to give to a bunch of worthless scavengers that do not deserve it. Let them sink. They've already made their money. It won't crash the economy any worse than throwing money at Iraq.
Corporations were the first in line to "cash out" and are one of the major reasons this is such a big mess. GM took out over 4 billion in investments the other day, according to CNN. 4 billion!!! It's a money grab pure and simple.
it looks like we're finally about to get a government so small we can fit it into a bathtub. henry paulson, one man, in charge of EVERYTHING.
now, what did grover turdquest say we were supposed to do when we got the government this small? i can't remember...
TrePorcellini @ 74:
unfortunately, we just told the world that we're going to print a $trillion. what should that be expected to do to the value of a dollar?
the weimar deutchmark was cheaper as wallpaper. paulson should have known better than to post the dollar amount on this larceny. now the market will be unstable as those who got left out try to screw it up for those who are getting over.
Uppity Blue Lensman @ 68:
gingrich is just pissed he can't get a slice.
Orangutan. @ 49:
for a dollar, americans by birth are destroying their native country.
tony blair is traveling the world preaching that corporations can use religion to control populations.
a man will sell his mother's soul because greed and our lower instincts keep winning.
euthyfro @ 1:
The issuance of our currency is controlled by the Federal Reserve. That's NOT free market capitalism. It's plutocratic socialism. In fact, you've never lived in a free market economy, unless you were born prior to 1913.
I know that there's an urge out there to write more laws, but think about it for a moment. We already HAVE passed laws. The SEC stands as a giant regulatory body, ostensibly created to regulate exactly the kind of thing that's going on right now. And yet, it apparently couldn't, or wouldn't do anything to stop it.
The Federal Reserve has quite a few smart people working for it. They were quite capable of counting the total money supply, and figuring out that the massive credit expansion was going to create the problems that we see today. And despite the fact that the conventional KEYNESIAN solution was to raise rates, and deal with a slight downturn, the Fed did nothing but LOWER rates.
Go ahead. Pass as many RULES as you may want. But if the people who are supposed to ENFORCE those rules don't know how to do their jobs, then the same mistakes will be repeated.
Or, you can go the route of our first poster, who's lived in a SOCIALIST ECONOMY all of his life, yet for some reason thinks that CAPITALISM and FREE MARKETS are to blame, and get your well-oiled, finely-tuned machine of a government to take over...
Think people.
Ron @ 38:
There are 512 TRILLION DOLLARS of derivatives out there put "in play" by the investment banks. The total GNP of the US is only $53 TRILLION DOLLARS. The total Fannie Mae/Freddy Mac exposure is 5 TRILLION DOLLARS. The total delinquent mortgages is less than one percent of the $700 billion. If it's all just about bad home loans, why are we going to spend so much money? And why did Paulson agree to buy ANY illiquid loans?
Because it's about much more than a bunch of bad home loans. Keep your eyes on the ball (those derivatives). The investment banks were trading the equivalent of the US GNP every three days.
StCyrlyMe 2 says,
If you notice this administration, including McSain and Co, now don't seem to think Government is such a bad thing.
They have managed to screw up all this money and run this country in the ground, now they are applying for Government Welfare, to bail them out.
This happens each and every dame time the republicans get in power. They get a clean slate and then they try to privatize everthing with no oversite or accountability and wham, here we go again. Only this time tops all that they have been allowed to do
This is testomony to what will happen if McSain should somehow manage to steal this election and get his disgusting ass in the white house, when most well knowledged of the issues, Americans knows that he has been a crusader for deregulation, his entire time spent in the Senate, and his voting record reflects this.
The very fact they want to continue to co-mingle Corporate America, with the more complicated operation and workings of the Federal Government systems, is an example of total incompetence and ill experience.and the fact that they continue to spew all this miss information to the public is simply criminal, to say the least..
A very good and clear example of the continued mess they are making is the arrogant insistence of allowing these major corporations,to continue the practice of not be accountable in both their responsibility to the consumers and of paying their fair share of TAXES..
Unfortunately we are graced with a bunch of ignorant clowns, all over our national media, whom are clearly inexperienced and unaware of the danger they too pose, by not bringing forth the brightest of our citizens, who are experienced in these areas.
They too want you to think, they know what the hell they are talking about, and they clearly do not. This insane notion of refusing to TAX these institutions and make them accountable or shut them down, is the real problem,
Senator Obama, clearly understands the needs and the roll that Government should play and he takes the very unpopular stand to call it as he sees it, Unlike McSain, who will continue this sick notion of allowing these corporate institutions to continue not paying their share of TAXES and allowing them to call their own shots, without Government intervention.
Obama is a Constitutional Scholar, with an extensive background in the workings of Federal Government. He has made it his life's work and anyone that knows as he does, the big differences is able to see this. These people have been able to blow smoke up our asses because they simply know most Americans don't understand and they take that notion and run with it. We have a real treasure in this guy.
We are currently now experiencing the down side of what can happen when we allow private agencies to run as they please without the proper checks and balances. They are not accountable to the audit process and when
they are, They show complete disregard for checks and balances and they fail to take the necessary corrective and punitive action required, to show that they understand that it is not an option to run a clean, accountable and consistent operation. By standards of federal law it is a requirement that must have consequences,if not followed
to the letter..
American people should NOT, continue to be responsible for the incompetent management of these corporations, whom are clearly not following the guidelines, set by the government, and it the major reason they are driving themselves in the hole, in the first place. This practice has to stop.
They need to understand fully that there are NO huge severance packages, given to incompetent management, what-so ever, and you cannot screw up billions and billions of Tax Payer dollars and still keep your job in federal government . They may not fire you, depending on the situations, but certainly, you will not continue to be in the job you have clearly shown you are not competent to manage, like the current cabinet staff of the Bush administration.
They clearly do not understand that they must operate in a consistent and open setting to show that they are consistently in compliance with regulations and they don't want that, which is why they all hate the Federal Government and want to PRIVATIZE IT.
These incompetent Bush appointments in all these Federal Cabinet Post, were purposely made to show government in the exact light the republicans want us to view it, As incompetent and inefficient, so as to continue this mantra of needing to privatize it. They show this by the insistence of keeping these incompetent morons, in the very positions they have been shown to be ill, equipped to manage and a good example is FEMA, which is headed by Michael Chertoff. Need I say more
Government is not a cash machine at all, but a necessary institution, designed to be the eye's and ears of the American people who do not have time to monitor private business, who are for profit,
They must be accountable period, and who better to force accountability but the Federal Government, who is accountable to the American people. That is when we have real qualified individuals managing it. They have created this mystical atmosphere of their interpretation of what they want the public to believe government is about, which is simply not the true picture.and I believe that Senator Obama clearly understands exactly what these folks are up too, and will conduct the proper adjustments using good qualified people to bring the agencies into compliance. I know that he knows this because he talked about in his book the Audacity of Hope, which is what sold me on him as a real leader, with a very good understanding of how and why our Government is so important to all of us..
Peace
ConcernedCanuck @ 84:
Hey, you want the system to keep on humming? With no guarantees, Paulson, or should I say the cabal, or the neocon clan, wants you to pay for the big bail out or else. Pay the piper or you are fucked. They have little time left so lets hurry up and give them the cash. I`m sure Pelosi and her spineless bunch of Democat double agents will again give us wonderful theatrics before they close the doors and make a deal. Bush wanted more money for his illegal war they handed it over. Domestic spying, sure have at-er. Lets tear up the constitution, ok. E-mails, go fuck yourself. The spineless Dems will do it again as long as they think their ass will be just fine.
The Devil Must Be Putting on his Ice Skates
Who'd a thought that our free market Republicans/Conservatives 'masters of the universe' would become stock market socialists. I wonder, does this mean that hell has frozen over?
Even when they totally screw up, US presidents, bankers and weathermen get to keep their jobs. Why?
OK, the weatherman is amusing, but what of the other two.
But, thank God we have socialism for the rich. Seriously, how would they make the payments on their multi-million dollar mansions and Mercedes’ without a little helping hand from Joe Middle Class American Taxpayer - who might even get to keep his job, if those market boys don’t ship it to China with the rest of America’s wealth.
http://blogoffanddie.wordpress.com
So long Dubya, we'll always have debt and Guantanamo. Vote McCain/Palin and build a bomb shelter.
Glen @ 91:
Leverage played a great part in the crash of 1929 and was subsequently regulated. Derivatives are called the "Weapons of Mass Financial Destruction" by Warren Buffet. Like any leveraged arrangement, the use of derivatives needs to be regulated.
This may be really hard on the people but it would be worth it to see a lot of these crooked bankers and swindlers commit suicide! Maybe we could get some footage of them jumping out of tall buildings.
james Ratliff @ 96:
Why would they commit suicide? Thanks to Republican president George W. Bush and his Republican administration, they're going to get a massive taxpayer-funded bailout. They'll be just fine.
Bush has already said he will veto Dodd's plan if it makes it through Congress. It's OK to bailout Corporations but not regular folks. Thanks Asshole!
Don't enable the greedy corporate leaders with bailouts
They killed the golden goose (middle class America), with all their greed. They paid themselves huge salaries and bonuses year after year in order to be a part of select group of citizen on the billionaires list. Why should this society support this life style at the expense of so many for so few. Now they want a hand out. Let them use their own money. Let the companies fold and put the ones responsible in jail and let’s move on.
We have a fiat currency bubble burst.
Financial Crisis Fundamental Foundation Flaws and Solution
Congress is tapping into this info today.
On http://coinage.me/
The flaws are articulated in detail as well as the solution which involves a New Global Value Exchange Accounting System they have a list of power questions that media and journalists can ask.
One interesting ironic insight is a small fortune can be made off pennies as a result of the amazing paradox resulting from current market conditions. 1 lb of pennies is worth $6.00 tangible and only $3.00 intangible.
They make an interesting point why shouldn't the bail out (citizens going into debt) go to pay off the mortgages and then trickle down to those firms needing to be bailed out?
Read the power questions. http://coinage.me/power_questions.htm
Login or Register to post comments.