Go Home

Brown Announces UK Troops Out Of Iraq By July

By Cernig

thumb_mediumBritIraq2_3def4.JPG

And so the coalition of the unwilling dwindles even further. Even UK conservatives abandoned Iraq as the wrong war, for the wrong reasons, at the wrong time, some years ago - as did the bulk of the British populace. Now Gordon Brown has flown to Bagdhad to announce a withdrawal of British forces by the end of July next year. Only 300 troops will remain to train Iraqi forces.

Brown had to spin it as completing a noble exercise in "the tasks of overthrowing a dictatorship, the task of building a democracy for the future and defending it against terrorism", of course, but I don't see him, his ministers or his senior officers heaving any kind of sigh except one of relief. Britain only stayed because of the "special relationship", not because anyone believed the narrative Bush and Blair concocted any more.

Oh, and the Iraqis tacked five other nations with a smaller troop presence, including Romania, El Salvador and Estonia, onto Britain's withdrawal agreement

Share This Post

Link To This Post


9 Comments
ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

And here I thought the Brits were always about going in and pulling out right away.


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

Lola Getz's picture

I just heard on Sky News about 2 minutes ago that Brown is saying British troops will be out of Iraq by May 2009, not July. The question at that time will be how many of those troops are diverted to Afghanistan.

Iraq Wants All Non-US Troops Out by July

link

Finally.


Politics is for the present, but an equation is for eternity. Albert Einstein

pissed off patricia's picture

See? Here's a man who knows how to avoid flying shoes.

Good for him and sticking by his word.

One more comment on the new set up as of this morning. When a thread of comments begins, the little yellow pop up that tells us a new comment is in, comes up behind the ads on the right. If you scroll down, it follows you and shows up beneath the ads. As the thread extends longer and longer until it finally gets below the ads, then it is clearly visible.


Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.

Steve Elly's picture

So 300 British will be left in Iraq to train Iraqis. You mean 300 targets. They won`t be there very long.

TeaEyeIs's picture

It will make it even harder to portray this horrible war as a product of some "coalition".

The sad part is that Gordon Brown, like our very own Obama, is talking about sending those troops to Afghanistan to "defend democracy".

I'm afraid that we're in a revolving door that never stops turning.

Jo's picture

they shouldn't have been there in the first place. Nor should we.

We are fast becoming a third-world country because of the military and their wanting to be the policemen of the world.

We will continue to get shitty infrastructure despite what Obama has promised if we don't close all the foreign bases and cut the military budget to where other countries spend.

The British Empire became too costly to endure. We should know better, too.

Lizzy Bennet's picture

It says a lot that the UK is getting out of Iraq. If we have no significant allies in this war to give it some credibility, then why are we there? Did the UN even pass the extension for the US occupation of Iraq?

Andy K's picture

Seriously, this is good news. Not great news until the US gets out, but still good news.

Comments are closed on this entry