TOPICS

Periodically over the last year and a half, the Bush administration and the US military have promised to provide proof of Iranian meddling in Iraq in the form of Iranian-provided weaponry in the hands of terrorists insurgents special groups criminals. Their first effort to do so, the infamous Baghdad Briefing, fell flat on its face when even Bob Gates and then Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Pace admitted that the incredibly weak evidence it presented proved nothing of the sort. Since then, various promised "smoking gun" briefings have been announced, postponed and then cancelled. Even the previously stenographic mainstream press finally noticed there was a lot of smoke and no fire.

That seems to be because, according to a task force of investigators advising the US military in Iraq - known as Task Force Troy - the narrative of Iranian weapons flooding across the border is only hype after all. Gareth Porter writes:

According to the data compiled by the task force, and made available to an academic research project last July, only 70 weapons believed to have been manufactured in Iran had been found in post-invasion weapons caches between mid-February and the second week in April. And those weapons represented only 17 percent of the weapons found in caches that had any Iranian weapons in them during that period.

The actual proportion of Iranian-made weapons to total weapons found, however, was significantly lower than that, because the task force was finding many more weapons caches in Shi'a areas that did not have any Iranian weapons in them.

The task force database identified 98 caches over the five-month period with at least one Iranian weapon, excluding caches believed to have been hidden prior to the 2003 U.S. invasion.

But according to an e-mail from the MNFI press desk this week, the task force found and analysed a total of roughly 4,600 weapons caches during that same period.

The caches that included Iranian weapons thus represented just 2 percent of all caches found. That means Iranian-made weapons were a fraction of one percent of the total weapons found in Shi'a militia caches during that period.

The extremely small proportion of Iranian arms in Shi'a militia weapons caches further suggests that Shi'a militia fighters in Iraq had been getting weapons from local and international arms markets rather than from an official Iranian-sponsored smuggling network.

Left out of the list of Iranian-made weaponry were 350 armour-piercing explosively formed penetrators (EFPs) found in Iraqi weapons caches. Despite the lurid claims of US officials, the task group couldn't ascribe an Iranian origin to a single one. Which along with press reports about finding EFP manufactories inside Iraq explains why, since mid-Summer, we've heard nothing about Iranian-made EFPs whereas before official reports and statements were full of them.

The academic research paper in which this revelatory data finally became public, by Joseph Felter and Brian Fishman of the West Point military academy, was finally published last month for the first time by West Point's Counter-Terrorism Centre.

Felter and Fishman do not analyse the task force data in their paper, but they criticise official U.S. statements on Iranian weapons in Iraq. "Some reports erroneously attribute munitions similar to those produced in Iran as Iranian," they write, "while other Iranian munitions found in Iraq were likely purchased on the open market."

The co-authors note that Iranian arms can be purchased directly from the website of the Defence Industries of Iran with a credit card.

Given that ease of purchase, a shared porous border and ubiquitous smuggling, the percentage of Iranian made arms is very low. But there are clear reasons Iran isn't doing so well in the Iraqi arms market.

Iranian equipment is less reliable and more expensive than Eastern Block materiel that flooded the region after the 2003 invasion -something which a certain imprisoned international arms dealer, ex-CIA and ex-US military contractor and supplier to despots and terrorists, Viktor
Bout, may well know a fair bit about. It's a buyer's market and the Iranians are seeing market forces exclude their produce, with the exception of simple artillery rockets. They're more expensive than the Pakistani arms bazaar's copies coming down the old Silk Road routes and far less effective than easily available and comparitively-priced black market US weapons too.

Over 190,000 US-provided guns found their way onto the black market in Iraq, simply disappearing from inventory after lax US and Iraqi accounting. Some even found their way to Turkey, into the hands of PKK terrorists. And to this day, no-one has held Gen Petreaus accountable for those 190,000 guns - weighing in excess of 475 tons* and worth over $50 million at non-black market prices or about twice that on the street - that he says were "kicked out of helicopters" or misplaced by clerical errors on his watch, despite one of his closest aides pleading guilty to corruption and bribery charges in relation to procurement contracts by a company involved in illegal arms dealing of US-provided weapons. He's apparently never been asked what he knew and when he knew it, reporting simply says there's no indication Gen. Petreaus was involved or aware of any wrongdoing - but he's never been subjected to a formal enquiry on the matter. And a GAO investigation begun back in August last year seems to have gone very silent.

So now we have a deafening silence - both on earlier accusations of Iranian arms running and meddling, which will just be allowed to sit their in the public mind, and on the very real high-level incompetence and corruption which led to so many US-provided weapons being lost without trace. That's just part of the Bush administration's gag order on the largest war profiteering adventure in history.

Add yet another couple of items to the very long list of hard questions the Obama administration should be asking about its predecessor and its doings.

Video above: Gareth Porter discussed the false narrative of Iranian weapons in Iraq with AntiWar.Com back in May.

(* 110,000 assault rifles @ 4kg per = 440 tons (plus about 80,000 pistols)
110,000 AK-47's, at the usual nation-to-nation arms deal price of @ $380 each, works out to @ $42 million, plus the pistols.)

Crossposted from Newshoggers

Related Reactions



Login or Register to post comments.

40 comments

there are probably more black market Iranian weapons on the streets of NY than there are in Iraq.

I bet there are more black market American weapons on the streets of Iraq than Iranian ones.

And that's half the reason they're complaining about (alleged) Iranian weapons - CYA.

The other half of the reason is to demonize Iran.

Same way they treat Democrats: accuse them of what the Republicans are in fact doing, thus diverting attention from themselves while at the same time demonizing the opposition.

Gotta watch out for them exploding pistacios and poisoned persian rugs

"There's an old saying ... fool me once, shame on you, fool me ... uh ... won't get fooled again ..."
-- George W. Bush

"Who's the more foolish? The fool, or the fool who follows him?"
-- Obi-Wan Kenobi

Damn, does that mean we'll have to continue carpet bombing from bombers

And not flying carpets?

The few who can depend on this maladministration to keep from interfering in their atrocities are making their moves. In Sudan, another kick, 60 journalists taken.

http://cabdrollery.blogspot.com/2008/11/avoid...

The horrible, sad, infuriating and insane part is not that they overstated and in fact lied but that there are millions of Americans that believe them still and will buy hook line and sinker all of the future lies they tell. Media reform should be if not the top at least one of the top priorities in the months to come. We must become a nation of informed opinion not stuck in the dark, knee jerk opinion.

"Mushroom Media"

The term 'mushrooming' means you're kept in the dark and fed shit.

No doubt in my mind part of the Bush-Cheney Plan from Day One has been to put arms in the hands of all potentially violent groups in Iraq to boost the level of violence, thus creating a protracted occupation, more destruction (requiring more re-construction), more killing and imprisonment of the strong Iraqis who could stand against the occupation, and of course more arms sales and more money from the US Treasury funneled to the Military Industrial Complex.

They have ALWAYS played both sides against each other, whether during World War Two, the Cold War, the Iran-Iraq War, or now in Iraq. It's much more profitable and much less risky when you're directing and supplying both sides.

About Cheney's one percent doctrine. Couple more guns and we'd have had to go to war. Again. Again.

This Administration just can't seem to do anything BUT Lie.
It's the WMD thing all over again. Same group of lying war-mongers continuing to try to keep the world in fear, blame everyone else for the mistake They made .... going into Iraq in the first place.

Had western markings on them.

What's an EFP?

Explosive(ly) Formed Penetrator.

I'd just looked it up m'self...nasty things those EFP's.

and American issue.

every time they display "iranian" weapons they look like they were made in peoria.

... kept track of Oliver North? His frequent trips to Iraq?

This seems right down his alley

This bunch is all about creating justification for the lies they tell. Some things they have done were just plain stupid. Remember the Jessica Lynch faked production. Why did they do that and how did they not think the truth would come to light? What was the point of doing it? They are somewhere between evil and stupid....I'm just not sure where.

they are both, but the price is paid in lives.

The Iranian weapons must have been moved into Syria.

...just like the WMDs that were never there.

$$$

The black-markets of the Middle East, and the fear of Obama takin' away our weapins 'n' such, is making US gun manufacturers as wealthy as...

ExxonMobil

This could be deceptive reporting though. The weapons may not have been made in Iran but it doesn't mean the weapons did not come from Iran.

Iran frequently buys their weapons from Russia. If they then run these weapons across the border into Iraq, it would not make a part of this statistic.

I'm sure there are people in Iran, and other countries working hard to maintain the flow of weapons into Iraq. As costly as this war has been on the US, it has also been costly on the insurgents and they are being supplied by someone. Just because Iran didn't MANUFACTURE the weapons, it doesn't mean they did not facilitate the acquisition or make the sale. Still, evidence of an actual intercepted shipment would help.

Do you have to make excuses for this administration? The America would never do wrong syndrom.

There are plenty of other potential sources of weapons. Because the US went in with far less troops than were recommended in the existing Pentagon plan they didn't have enough soldiers to secure the weapons of the Iraq military, also because they had to spend all their time looking for non-existent WMD's they ignored the tons of conventional weapons. So the insurgents have plenty of weapons stashed. Also, the US military and Blackwater have been terrible in keeping track of and controlling weapons that the bring into the country. Just the other day Blackwater was given a slap on the wrist fine for not following proper procedure when bringing weapons into the country, and the conventional wisdom was that as a result many of those weapons ended up on the black market. Finally, there is good old fashioned capitalism. There may indeed be weapons coming in from Iran. That doesn't mean they are being provided by the Iranian government. There is a thriving black market.

in the fonts, or the highlighting or the punctuation. they must be in there somewhere, right?

sounds a lot like concern troll paranoia.

Most of the guns are from Russia? China? USA?. Who do we react against first?...Bush/Chaney?

....Democratic Senatorial meeting. Poor loser Joe....wrong on everything.

How does Chairman of handing out mints in the Men's room sound?

I'd rather Lieberman be made Chairman of Urinal Cake Replacement.

Big deal. King George the Lesser will say he doesn't agree with the findings of this report and that will be that for 25-30 percent of Americans.

correctly pointed out: absence of proof is not proof of absence. If I were making EFPs for the insurgent market in Iraq I damn well wouldn't stamp them with a country of origin mark.

And so is RD, to whom I believe you're refering.

But there's just as much proof right now (little to none) that there exists a US operation to put Iranian made- or originating from anywhere in the world, for that matter- weapons into the hands of the Iraqi insurgency. To hell with Spain, remember the Maine! and whatnot.

Hi Peter,

The US military didn't eventually, claim that EFPs carried identifying names, numbers, logos etc. They claimed that scoring marks produced during manufacture on EFP caps proved they were Iranian because the Iraqis didn't have the machinery to make items by the production process used (never mind that other nations besides Iran do, you weren't meant to think about that). However, the narrative collapsed earlier this year when it was pointed out that the Iraqi department of industry had been touting the ability to do just that at trade fairs across the globe and on its website, using machinery purchased in new Zealand, Indonesia, India and elsewhere, since 2004.

Regards, C

I find it ironic that the US government is so wrought up about the possibility of Iranian weapons finding their way into a war zone in Iraq.

I am personally more concerned about the flow of American weapons into the city in which I live.

The sources of the weapons are well known. (Yeah, Arrowhead Pawn Shop, 6455 Tara Blvd #7-a, Jonesboro, GA 30236, I'm lookin' at you.) The funerals of innocent children (Michael James, 6, of Mississauga, Ontario) are a matter of public record. And the proportion of guns in Toronto that come from the US is a lot more than 1% of what's on the street.

But the death of Canadian children by American weapons is of no concern to Americans. It's so much easier to demonize someone far away for doing what you do all the time.

keepin' it real!
thanks.

The RPG the guy in the photo is aiming and the AK-47 his buddy is certainly covering him with are as cheap and reliable as light infantry weapons get and are as effective as they were in Vietnam and in every other conflict that has been fought with guns on this planet in the last 50 years.

be afwaid! be vewy afwaid.

enemies evewywhere.

.

.

Q U E S T I O N:
How many weapons in Iraq caches can be traced to the USA?

R E M E M B E R:
When the US Government claims it's intelligence is credible because it has the corroboration of the international community, IT'S A LIE! Just like "SMOKING GUNS" "WMD'S" and "TIES TO AL-CIA-DUH!"

.

Do you think Iran makes all the weapons that they provide? The AK-47 is one of the most popular well made weapons out there. Is it Iranian made? No. Is it the number one assault rifle in Iran? Yes. Come on... I don't care who made them.... I care who the Iranians give them to. This is the same as when we gave weapons to the Afghan warriors during their war with russia. We didn't give them just US weapons. We gave them what we could for cheap... this included tons of AK-47s. (... and not American made AK-47s.)

40 comments

Login or Register to post comments.