Start at seconds (Use current time from player)
We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.
"When he was asked for an example of what he would do to attack the root cause of poverty,.."----Good! That's the RIGHT question to ask...for a change.
"I would consolidate many of our federal poverty programs into flexible programs that go to our states to customize a welfare benefit for person's particular need," he explained."----Ok. But MORE DETAILS please!
" ... we're actually disincentivizing a person from getting on with their life and going to work...It pays not to take a risk to take a job to go out an(d) (im)prove your life because of the benefits your lose."----NO!! ...just the same old Republican talking points!
THE NEXT QUESTION should have been:" How exactly would your idea of customising welfare benefits for a person's particular needs ensure that they make a better life for themselves?
They didn't kill anyone.
Not necessarily at the scene but in the media. Will we see anyone on the Ailes propaganda network assert that this is religious persecution and not an exercise in "free speech"? Why were the armed guards necessary if this was all about "freedom"? Did Geller also invite the participants to draw hateful depictions of Orthodox Jews or Christ on the cross? That would be "free speech", too, would it not?
----- going to lead to more freedom for all of us, whether or not we intend to use it.
You live in the land of the free and have free speech. What's this more freedom you talk of? It's not like some commodity you stick in the bank and save for later. WTF you on about?
-----you support the rights of the artists to do their art or you remain silent.
And, in exercise of your unlimited, super-duper, only in America free speech, shut yer fucking trap if you don't like something
I think your brain has short circuited
Orangeman spends more money on the Turtles Kentucky Bourbon than Ohio food