'Extremely Offensive' For Reid To Compare Health Care To Civil Rights, Slavery! Senator Hatch

December 07, 2009 FOX News This morning, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took to the Senate floor to make a plea for passing health care reform, co

December 07, 2009 FOX News

This morning, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took to the Senate floor to make a plea for passing health care reform, comparing it to the fight for civil rights, women's suffrage and an end to slavery. Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) took offense on FOX News. "That's not only offensive! That's language that should never be used!"

From The Salt Lake Tribune--Hatch files abortion amendment to Senate health reform bill:

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and a Democratic colleague filed a highly anticipated health-reform amendment on Monday that would bar any federally subsidized insurance plan from covering elective abortions.

The issue of abortion coverage within health insurance exchanges has turned into one of the largest roadblocks for reform, inflaming an already intense partisan debate.

The Senate is expected to vote on the measure Tuesday and even Hatch expects it to fail. But the amendment, which is also sponsored by Nebraska Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson, isn't expected to be the final word on the topic.

The Democrats need Nelson's support to pass the overall health reform bill and he has threatened to buck his party if they don't include tougher abortion restrictions.

The Nelson-Hatch amendment would bring the Senate bill in line with the House health reform proposal, which would not allow any government-run plan to offer elective abortion coverage. The amendment would also bar anyone getting a federal subsidy from selecting a plan sold in the exchange that would pay for abortion services.

Those who use their own funds could buy such a plan, or what is known as an insurance rider specifically for abortion coverage. This amendment would not impact people who get their insurance through their employer.

Hatch has pushed for the tougher abortion language in the committee debates earlier this year to no avail. The amendment would need the support of 60 votes and it is unlikely that 20 Democrats would join the 40 Republicans to pass such a proposal.

Democrats argue that their bill already bars federal money to pay for abortions because it requires insurers to separate federal subsidies from the premiums paid by customers. Under their bill, only premiums could be used to cover elective abortions.

Continue reading...

About CSPANJunkie

Comments

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.