Darcy Burner fights the Republican smear machine

Darcy Burner is fighting back against Dave Reichert's last-minute smear campaign accusing Darcy of fluffing her academic record -- even though Reichert is guilty of exactly that himself.

The video above is a powerful response to Reichert's own smear ads, but that hasn't stopped the right-wing Wurlitzer cogs. On KOMO-AM today, the right-wing talkers were once again smearing Burner as a liar.

You know what to do. Go help Darcy now.

Related Reactions



Login or Register to post comments.

33 comments

A self paying, not relying on old money or donations to get her education, doing the hard yards, educated woman, a Democrat to boot, be better than their lame-assed GOP contender? Maybe they should look and clean up their own messes before trying to splash it on everyone else.

Good positive pushback! I would think that any district in WA state would be glad to have Ms. Burner as their rep. including the very conservative Mercer Island Crowd.

The Obama Camp pushes back

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1c1kXuBpf8

the 8th district will elect a D when we're all in our graves.

p.s. I hope I'm wrong.

You know what to do. Go help Darcy now.

I love it. Thanks David.

ps, there is a problem with commenting on the Hungry Like a Wolf thread.

to site monitors about that.

WHY CAN'T WE COMMENT ON THE "Hungry Like the Wolf" THREAD?

I can't describe the low tactics of the Republican campaign in Minnesota. The latest was a flyer sent out to voters against Al Frankin. It's a fold out cartoon talking about his porno writing and his depraved behavior. The only problem with this brilliant campaign move is that children getting the mail would be inclined to open it up.

for children seeing porn. Seems logical to Me.

But this is buggin me.
Why is it(the following Duran Duran post being an example)that when there are 0 posts,it doesn't say:"Post a New Comment"?
Is anyone else experiencing this odd glitch?Or am I making a Boob of myself by overlooking something glaringly obvious?

I e-mailed site monitors

Now Dino Rossi, Washington state's seemingly perpetual Republican candidate for governor, is being deposed--I believe I heard it had to do with illegal contributions to his campaign from the wood products industry, one of his biggest supporters.

Rossi has done nothing but smear his opponent, Democratic governor Christine Gregoire, since she narrowly defeated him in '04, triggering one of the famed "voter fraud" firings of a Republican federal attorney.

Not so clean yourself, are you there, Dino?

God forbid Rossi gets elected. I honestly didn't think he stood a chance. Gregoire has been a very successful Governor. But apaprently it's pretty close. Rossi has absolutely nothing to offer to this state.

Here in eastern Washington, the general mindset is one of mistrust of government, as though government is responsible for their lot in life. To the extent that the anti-trust laws have been neutralized by the sitting legislature (Republican for the past 13 of 15 years), that may be true.

If truth be known, though, it has been the willingness of the Republicans to socialize agriculture that has been the undoing of their rural way of life.

Unfortunately, those mistrusting individuals don't always make the right connection.

Governor Gregoire has been an

they are are all having dinner(?) Anyway -What shall we talk about?

Darcy Burner is the one who has been lying and attempting to smear Congressman Dave Reichart's record. Dave grew up in our community, worked hard for us as King County Sheriff and now serves us well in the U.S. Congress. Darcy Burner has lived in Washington State for less than ten years....and she wants us to think she knows what our concerns and interests are? She shows up as an ambitious twit who wants to join the likes of Maria Cantwell, Patti Murray and Christine Gregoire in making Washington State an old gals club. (I am a woman, by the way...but, unfortunately, none of these women represent my viewpoints or values). What's up with you men voters? Do you care to be represented at all? Send Dave Reichert back to Congress....he puts Washington State first.

If you love the GOP, you are one sick puppy!

While I agree with you that Burner has been much more guilty of negative campaigning than Reichert I disagree with just about everything else you say. Men should vote for men just because they're men? That's just plain dumb. But in case you didn't know there are plenty of men in the WA congressional delegation. In fact there is currently only one woman (and she's a Republican.) The current WA reps are Jim McDermott(D), Jay Inslee(D), Rick Larsen(D), Norm Dicks(D), Brian Baird(D), Doc Hastings(R), Cathy McMorris(R), Dave Reichert(R), and Adam Smith(D). If you don't know that I really have to wonder if you're actually from WA at all.

...you can be sure they're personally twice as guilty of exactly the same thing, even if it's something ridiculous like calling their opponents troop-hating, drug-using, gay-sex-having, bribe-taking, vote-missing sons of bitches.

LoveMyYGOP -- it's fine to criticize Burner for "only" living in the state for 10 years, but that doesn't make it right to lie about her educational record or other aspects of her life.

Why should you support a liar?

My old stomping grounds, Harvard Univ- Well. let me tell you, the local right wing radio slime merchants hate Harvard and all it stands for because in their words, Harvard produces 'egghead liberal elites'. I take such as an admission on the right that they are proud of their collective ignorance, and hate thouse who aspire for higher academic achievements. If you want to attack someone for minimal eductaion- look no further than Sarah Palin...

uh

let's forget all about GWB's Harvard Brand MBA, then shall we? Talk about minimal fucking education...

:P

...you go after someones strength and hide your own weakness on it by attacking them. Makes perfect sense if you are an extreme right winger.

The right wants to train all its minions to hate such universities because they encourage critical thinking. They want minions who will mindlessly follow their leaders, parrot slogans and get all upset with anything liberal. Liberals, on the other hand, criticize not only the opposition but its own candidates and each other and are not threatened by diversity of thought.

They accuse you of doing the inappropriate, shameful, and/or illegal thing they are actually doing.

Greed
Obfuscation
Projection

Please make it stop.

-

Obama '08

Republicans are rude and negative because they have nothing of any substance or intelligence to say. They know they're fighting a losing battle. ...

word

It's what I call the "Takes One to Know One Syndrome," where you're doing something shady so you think your opponent, your boyfriend, your coworker, etc. is doing the same thing, but then you're wrong. (Like, you're thinking about cheating on your boyfriend therfore you develop this suspicion that he's cheating on you.) So maybe I should call it "Takes One to Know One + a Smidgen of Paranoia and Narcissism Syndrome."

I'm a Democrat and I live in Seattle and I would vote for Burner if I was in her district (Jim McDermott is my Rep) but she has run a very negative campaign-much more so than Reichert. This is not the Republican smear machine going after a poor, innocent grassroots candidate. It's Reichert responding in kind after months of attack ads from Burner. Sorry but that's the way it is. I hope Burner wins but this story is flat wrong on the facts.

I'm in Seattle too. and I see her ads in a different light. The latest from that do-nothing Dave 'It only took me 25 years to catch a guy nicknamed 'Green River Gary' by his Kenworth coworkers' Reichert is the arse who is all negative all the time. And lying. Lying about his alleged accomplishments, while lying about Burner's academic record.

Her ads have focused on her accomplishments. The shit on Reichert ads are coming from another source, like the Democrstic Party, or a Democratic Party interest group, or groups, and there's no Burner tag in them ("I'm Darcy Burner, and I approve this message"). She really has no control over stuff her campaign does not produce.

Maybe. I think I've seen at least one negative ad with her endorsement but I could be mistaken. But by the same token most of the negative ads aimed at her have not been endorsed by Reichert. I don't recall if the latest slew of "She doesn't really have an economics degree from Harvard" silliness is approved by Reichert or not. That's district (Bellevue, Redmond, Kirkland, Mercer Island) is full of rich people though so it tilts right.

Would love to see Reichert get beat. Self-aggrandizing chump. Acted like he was the only one who solved the Green River case.

33 comments

Login or Register to post comments.