Jack Cafferty turns Obama concern troll.
Getting the stimulus bill passed is one thing, but before we break out the champagne we might want to see if it works. And nobody is offering a guarantee on that. In fact, there are folks out there who are suggesting that if the economy doesn’t show some signs of life pretty soon, the American public might begin to sour on the euphoria surrounding the man from Illinois.
For example, here’s a headline: “Has Barack Obama’s presidency already failed?” That’s a rather startling question posed in the Financial Times by columnist Martin Wolf. He writes how in normal times, this would be a ludicrous statement. But because we’re living in times of “great danger”, it’s worth taking a look.
He says that right now a lot of the blame is still being heaped on the previous administration. But if the Obama administration doesn’t act swiftly and strongly enough, it will inherit the blame. He says “doing too little is now far riskier than doing too much” and suggests that if the president can’t fix the economic meltdown, the rest of his presidency is pretty much over.
According to Wolf’s column, both the stimulus package and Tim Geithner’s banking plan seem to be hoping for the best, when what they really need to do is expect the worst. Wolf says he’s surprised that the new president let Congress pretty much write the stimulus package, and he sees the new banking proposal as too indecisive and optimistic.
Meanwhile, a CNN-Opinion Research Corporation poll out this week shows an American public looking very favorably on the new president, with an approval rating of 76%. That includes a whopping 97% of Democrats and 50% of Republicans.
But people aren’t nearly as fond of the president’s stimulus package, with only 54% supporting the Senate bill. If more and more Americans continue to lose their jobs, it’s unclear how long Mr. Obama can keep those numbers up.
Here’s my question to you: If the economy doesn’t start to improve, how long does President Obama have before the public turns on him?
Apparently many of the commenters at his blog felt the same way I did about the question.
Joe from Denver writes:
Jack. I can’t believe you would even ask this question. It took years to get into this mess and it will not be fixed in a month. President Obama hasn’t even seen all the rooms in the White House and you want to question his future effectiveness. The greatest economic minds have been brought together to help shape this stimulus package. If this group can’t come up with solutions, then who can?
Barbara from Bloomington, Indiana writes:
Given his gift of communication, his determination, raw energy, and grace, he’ll have a much longer acceptance period. But what’s more important is that he’s setting the right example so that we can all possess these skills in life. I’m very optimistic.
Unless something is done to provide jobs, which still not only has not happened — there is no sign of it happening, there is no hope for Obama being re-elected. Throwing money at this problem, without solving the basic problem of no jobs in America (they all went to China), is likely going to become known as “Obama’s Folly”, in time.
Ken from Jefferson City, Missouri writes:
Jack, The president has 6 months to 1 year. If things don’t show improvement, he will lose all credibility and his re-election. The people of this country do not have the patience to wait.
Joey from Seattle writes:
Honestly, that all depends on the media. After all, they already helped shape the American public opinion of the stimulus bill by giving the Republicans the microphone almost 24/7. If the media want to paint Obama as the new bad guy, then it shall be so. I personally feel it is more important to be honest and open because the stakes are too high to play “headlines” with these stories.
Was that just a stupid question or a political wish?