Americans Want Real Health Care Reform. Help Us Make Congress Understand
By Howie Klein Sunday Jun 21, 2009 10:00amJudging from the talking points being constantly spewed by the likes of Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Eric Cantor (R-VA), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Paul Ryan (R-WI), Max Baucus (DLC-MT), Blanche Lincoln (DLC-AR), Mary Landrieu (DLC-LA), Joe Lieberman (DLC-CT), and Ben Nelson (DLC-NE), and by the coverage in the corporate media, all of it driven primarily by corporate dollars, one would think that most people oppose Obama's tyrannical plans to impose dreaded health care reform on the American people. But, no. Americans overwhelmingly want health care reform. Wisely, they don't trust the crooked CEOs who run the insurance companies and they don't trust the bought off, sold out Republicans in Congress. Every single poll that comes out shows that Americans-- by gargantuan margins-- favor genuine, government-run health care.
That's why the insurance companies and their shills in Congress are fighting tooth and nail, like mad dogs, to kill the compromise between an Insurance company bailout (the Senate Finance Committee plan authored by Max Baucus and Chuck Grassley) and single payer. The compromise, which offers consumers a choice, is called the "public option." Anyone who likes their for-profit Insurance company's service can stick with it. Otherwise, they can opt for the non-profit government run plan. Studies by the insurance industry show that within a couple of years there will be virtually no people choosing for-profit insurance companies.
John is in Florida but he e-mailed me this story from the NY Times and asked me to pass it along and remind people that Blue America is asking for donations for the television ads we're doing to make Arkansas voters aware that their senator isn't really their senator; Blanche Lincoln belongs to the Big Business CEOs who have financed her career. While she works behind the scenes to protect the interests of her Insurance Industry patrons, Americans "are strongly behind one of the most contentious proposals Congress is considering, a government-run insurance plan to compete with private insurers, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll." Even half the respondents who admitted they are Republicans prefer this plan, while among normal Americans, the margins are staggering. Look at this chart and then please consider learning more about (or donating to) our Campaign for Health Care Choice.









Login or Register to post comments.
This topic and the last new rules post are so perfect. This seems to be a milestone. I think people are realizing that they come 4th and 5th in line to so many other groups and organizations. The polls show we want a public option. If we don't get it then there should be no doubt we are being governed by money. Where are the virtuous statesman and patriots?
The difference between what "some" Congressional Democrats are calling "The Public Option" and a true, "Single Payer Health Care System (Conyers H.R. 676)".
My understanding of what will occur if "the Public Option" goes through is that the government will be saddled with the sickest of the sick. All those Americans who have "pre-existing" conditions and CANNOT get private insurance will be FORCED TO BUY IN TO THE PUBLIC OPTION OR BE FINED.
One way or another you will HAVE to choose private insurance or "the Public Option" or pay the price if you don't.
I'd like it if ABC would show the 2003 clip of Barack Obama stating that he fully supports "Single Payer" healthcare at their little townhall meeting coming up, then ask him to respond:
http://buelahman.wordpress.com/2009/06/15/oba...
And here's a physician (who happened to get arrested a few days ago after standing up and demanding that "Single Payer" be ON THE TABLE at a Congressional Hearing on health care), who is a spokesperson for Physicians for a National Health Program on The Real News Network:
http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com...
This is so true. And the option your forced to purchase is like a crap HMO. I'm very poor (i run a couple non-profits), living with Hep C. I COULD waste my only precious resources - and probably not be really able to afford the $500 a month - and then not get coverage for anything, get screwed if I need any medication or care, and have to fight the usual fights to get any interventons covered by said HMO. I had Cigna for a while--they were typically horrible.
Those stinking miserable bastards in Congress would I and millions more like me suffer and DIE rather than buck the powers that be and their ample funds.
Folks with less disposable income ready to contribute for the good of the grater whole,and yet those with more at their fingertips won't pry those greenbacks out of their cold,but being kept alive hands.
These poll results about how the public feels about health care would be great news if Congress worked for the public. But it doesn't depend on the public to keep its job, it depends on contributors. You need to poll the contributors and see how they feel about health care reform to get any idea of what kind of plan we're actually going to get.
But let's not leave this argument with the idea that our system of legalized bribery, er, campaign contributions, is to blame. Bribery isn't actually legal, so why don't prosecutors, faced with gross and palpable quids and pro quos, put the cases in front of juries? More directly, why does the publc keep re-electing as its putative representatives, folks who flagrantly reward their votes by working for other people, their contributors?
The best answer I can come up with is the idea that people put up with this because they believe that their just place in life is to submit meekly to being governed by folks who make a lot of money. We're all trying to make piles of money, right? So it's natural that those of us who succeed have to be the most competent and driven, right? We don't want a bunch of fools or wimps or slugs, or whatever failings cause someone to not make piles of money, running things, do we?
You thought we lived in a democratic republic. Hah! If that were the case, then where did all of these oligarchs come from? How come they're not in jail? After they're all in jail, then talk to me about a republic and democracy. Then maybe I'll pay attention to polling of the voters. Until then, look at what the oligarchs want if you want to understand what "our" government will do.
But Congress does NOT work for us - they work for the corporations that pay for their seat in Congress. The Voters are an unfortunate inconvenience - especially when we start asserting our rights.
*
I wrote this letter today and started sending it out to various Republicans. Feel free to use all of it, parts of it, or ideas from it if it you think it might help the cause of getting real health care reform.
I have been watching Republicans go on TV and say that they are not in favor of a public health plan because they don't want a government bureaucrat between a person and their doctor.
You all look very silly when you all say that. Everyone in this country knows that the average person already has an insurance company bureaucrat between them and their doctor. And may I add an insurance company bureaucrat whose sole purpose is to deny that person service if it is at all possible.
Your "government bureaucrat" argument doesn't even pass the giggle test. I think the American public deserves better than lame and ridiculous excuses like that. I'm sure they sound good when your party sits around a big table in their elite Washington think tanks dreaming up these talking points. But when the average person hears them they sound totally inane.
Over 70% of American citizens want a public option. How long do you and your party think you can ignore that many of your fellow citizens? Isn't your job to represent your constituents and to not ignore them?
Health care in this country is broken. We have let the insurance companies run it for decades and we can all see the result. Forcing people to buy health insurance from these companies will do NOTHING to solve this issue that is so important to every American.
The definition of insanity it doing the same thing over and over and expecting to get different results. So by that reasoning throwing more money at the insurance companies in an attempt to solve the health care crisis is quite simply insane.
In my humble opinion the Republican party has completely out of touch with the average American, and to some extent with reality itself.
Polls like this come out and yet it seems that the Senate is living in a parallel universe. Today on one of the weekly talk shows, we get Sen Graham from South Carolina saying that the public option needs to "go away". WTF?
It's the Senators who are in the pocket of the Health Care Industry and Big Pharma that need to "go away", and we need to quit re-electing these incumbents who are beholden to everyone, but the people they are supposed to represent.
must be reading my comments here. They are bringing up the fact that lowering health care costs will boost the economy.
Congress is exempt. You don't necessarily get to keep your current plan. If you can afford it and don't get a qualifying plan and prove that you have one, you get fined. If you're below the poverty line you don't have to get, and thus don't have, any insurance.
What is the fucking point? Oh yeah, more money to private insurers. It's like privatized social security, where the main idea was more money to inflate the stock market.
http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB1245368...
Time to Abolish the Congressional Health Care Plan.
*
Let those bastards deal with insurance companies like the rest of us. Is there anyway to get a real movement going on this? Only when they have to put up with the crap the rest of us have to will they begin to see the problem.
Folks with more money feel more confident about not losing their coverage, so they are less inclined to support a plan with higher taxes. People vote their interests. Even so, there is good support.
there are a lot more people without money than with it. However, those without money seem to think that they don't have access to their government, when their congressperson is only a call away.
doesn't guarantee the right results.
But at least they can make their wishes known.
it's an issue of "making" them understand as it is one that they don't WANT to understand.
They have decided that only the wealthy and their contributors and they should have taxpayer funded benefits. Those of the rest of us who are just trying to make it from day-to-day and paycheck-to-paycheck can just keep paying the bills and go to hell.
that are not of the wealthy class, however I am reminded of few elite that think they should pay more taxes. I look at the general public of European nation in the media, and see how healthy their teeth is, and compared that with our public in the media, and blown away of how many teeth are missing, and how many have died from complication of bad teeth. Everyone understand that when you own a car, and let small things like a leaky radiator or leaky oil and bad brakes continue to run without addressing the issue that a bigger problem more costly will result from neglect of ignoring it.
I do think that creating a costly solution to your health is the corporate way of saying go to hell for the paycheck to paycheck Americans. Thus creating slaves of indenture servant of never being able to pay off debt.
I have had a kidney operation from a tumor that was removed, and now I couldn't get insurance if I wanted to. I end up losing my job from too many sick days, and the doc blame it on anxiety attack, until my kidney shut down in another city. Now I am in debt and its harder to find another job because of my bad credit from medical cost. My income been below $7,000 per year 3 year in a row, working part time, and still $4,000 in debt from the creditor. I have no idea if my kidney is okay, and doing the best I can to take care of 75% of one kidney that may have another tumor.
Here's the thing, I have had a MRI and there was a tumor size of the coin, but I didn't find out until my kidney shut down in a bigger city and it grew to the size of a grapefruit, and they transfer the record to the city hospital. My teeth eroded from the complication of the tumor, and the whole thing could have been taken care of way back, if my first doctor that discover the tumor, had told me and did a much less complicated surgery to remove it, back when it was just a leaky oil leak, instead of a major engine overhaul.
I have been told that if you don't have insurance that doctor tend to ignore elective surgery. Denzial Washington made a very good movie base on this type of scenario, when the character son need a new heart.
but I think my American friends ought to consider voting in some representatives that actually represent them. Frankly I thought that some fundamental health care reform, which you both need and deserve, would be a fait accompli once the democrats assumed control of both houses and the presidency but now I begin to doubt that. The battle isn't over but I'm appalled at where the opposition is coming from. The Republicans I expected to oppose a decent health care system for every American. Meanness of spirit is a fundamental characteristic of those people but democrats?
it's not just the health care system that is flawed but also our political system. The 1st major flaw that they should have tackled is public financing of our elections. The corporations have way too much influence in our elections.
This is the root of the problem.
*
No Shit Sherlock.
Sorry - I'm in the WORST mood over this.
We too cannot believe where the opposition is coming from.
But these "DLC" Democrats are pseudo-Democrats. They hail from conservative states - which in itself means nothing because Americans are overwhelmingly in favor of health care reform. But they think their conservative inclinations provide cover for their bullshit.
They are, or course, completely The Creatures of the Health Insurance Industry.
*
I fully understand your mood and my snarkiness was perhaps misplaced. I have to agree that Andy nailed it. Money does appear to be the root of this evil.
is 200 times more then the 50's 60's 70's.
Increased taxes hurt how bout just decreasing the cost of Medical Services for a change. Do Physicians really need a 15,000 sq ft home and drive a benz to work?
How many Americans incomes went up 200 times to stay even with inflation and a devalued dollar?
We also "don't trust don't trust the bought off, sold out" Democrats in Congress.
ABOLISH the Congressional Health Care Program NOW!
They don't get single-payer until we do.
*
this isn't likely to happen soon. But it would be a great way to get their attention.
Someone needs to pick it up and run with it -- Move On, or Olbermann -- that would give it some media attention.
*
any representative in Congress... Congressperson or Senator, has ever had to stay in a lousy job because switching jobs would mean pre-existing conditions at the new job and a waiting period to be covered for health insurance.
How many Congress people have had to decide what level of coverage one could afford to cover one's family/dependents every year at insurance benefit sign-up time?
I wonder if Congress people ever have to decide which would be covered this year: coverage for new glasses or coverage for dental would be more cost effective?
Congress people ever have had to pay Cobra out of their own pocket? Or hold their breath to see if it would be needed in the 60 days that it would cover in between jobs?
These are the games Americans get to play all the time with Health care coverage. It is such a fun game.
What reason is Congress using to justify enforcing Mandatory Health Coverage?
I know the real reason -- the Insurance companies.
But what reason are they giving for this nonsense?
*
I also think we have another issue of allowing company to use medical debt against you for employment seeking opportunity. If you have medical debt, you cant get a job to pay off your debt, if the debt is use against you for employment.
Right after I was struggling to pay the medical debt, I was struck by a truck turning left into the wrong lane, while I was bike riding and was disable to work for awhile, and no way to pay for the debt, and use all my settlement money to pay partially the debt. The insurance company of the guy who hit me forbid me to have a specialist look at some of my damages, and only approve of a chiropractor for my back injuries, but not to see if my kidney is okay, because of precondition. Although I have been told that if I ever got hit that I am required to check for kidney damages.
The beucrat of the other guy's insurance was also flawed in the health system.
So Sad - and even sadder is that your story is just one of tens of millions across America.
This is where the Insurance companies made a grave tactical error - but it's inherent in their system.
By now those people that don't have their own health Care Horror Story -- know people that do. Either their friends or their family - but EVERYONE knows people who have been horribly and amorally screwed over by the insurance companies.
This is why the public is so overwhelmingly in favor of a Single-Payer system.
*
Taking away their insurance will be the only way to get their attention.
Of course it won't hurt them - every one of them could buy themselves health insurance many times over.
But the media attention to this demand from the voters would shake things up a little in the halls of congress I think.
They would know just how REALLY pissed off we are.
*
There has to be a way to go after the insurance companies. They are the ones buying off congress leading away from health care at a reasonable price. Hit the insurance companies in their pocketbook.
The way to go after the Insurance Companies is to Go after Congress. Make these critical changes happen.
Congress is deliberately turning a blind eye to the fact that this is so much bigger than the profits of the poor beleaguered Insurance Industry.
We're talking about a viable recovery for the middle class and the entire American economy. Without some relief of this real health care crisis - that can't happen. It'll all collapse - we CAN'T sustain this situation any longer.
We have to find a way to reach the egregiously greedy representatives in DC.
*
and I'd choose the public option immediately (if it's as described in that question, i.e., a Medicare type plan for anyone who wants it) because it would be less expensive than what I'm paying now. A lot less. It would have to be. And frankly, there are an awful lot of people out there who either don't have insurance but are not sick, or who are paying through the nose like I am and are not sick, who would gladly switch. I want a true single payer plan that puts everyone in it. But if we can't have that, then Medicare for anyone who wants it is an option I could live with for the time being. Like the Repubs like to say, there are 119 million Americans who would switch immediately. The bought and paid for politicians don't like that because it would spell the end of the health insurance industry. But to that I say, hallelujah!
... a video clip to TubeTV when the TV Doctors discussed Healthcare on 5/13/2009. It points out why insurance is necessary and what could happen and has happened to those who were uninsured or under-insured.
The TV Doctors discuss Healthcare:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFD5rGEVzn8
Do I, as the insured, need to pay Dividends to investors (Read: Capitalistpigs), who could go invest in something else like wheels for miscarriages, or pay for the lobbyists' salaries + the payoffs to Congressmen and Senators?
Do we, as the insured need to pay for infrastructures of a thousand or more companies, their staffs, CEOs and incidentals when we could support just one, albeit larger one?
...they need to do more than say so in a poll where they're sitting at home and someone calls them. That isn't going to do it.
It matters not what 'Americans' want. It only matters what the CEO's of the health industry want.
You do all know that over 80% of Americans have health insurance, right?
And you do also know that over 70% of those without it still received health care, right?
And that the vast majority of both groups are pleased with the health care they receive?
Of course most Americans think they want public run health care, but that's likely because they aren't aware of any of these facts. And it's no surprise, with left wing politicians constantly bemoaning the "crisis of the uninsured" and propping themselves up as saints for wanting to be some sort of modern day Robin Hood.
This is not to say that I'm entirely opposed to some kind of public health care option, just that the manner in which this discussion is typically framed (as seen in the article above) is ludicrous. If people with diseases/injuries that are not any fault of their own want to give up their cable tv, internet access, and cell phone plan, I would not at all oppose the government giving them whatever assistance they may still need to obtain the coverage they require. But just giving everyone health care - even those that could currently afford it and choose not to - is absolutely absurd.
Civilizaitions existed and thrived for thousands of years without public health care having exist, don't start suddenly acting as though it's a prerequisite to being a decent society.
All this talk about how "Americans want public health care" is irrelevant if that desire is based on unfounded or ill informed opinions. So please, stop talking about how Congress isn't doing exactly what polls show Americans want - that's why we have a republic and not a democracy. That's how it's supposed to work.
Login or Register to post comments.