Real Democrats Standing Strong For American Working Families
By Howie Klein Monday Aug 24, 2009 6:00amOne week ago we started a Netroots-wide action at Blue America, inspired by Darcy Burner's closing keynote speech at Netroots Nation, thanking the 65 stalwart progressives who have promised-- in letters to Speaker Pelosi and HHS Secretary Sebelius and to activists from Firedoglake-- to stick with the public option, even after the bribe-besoted Senate tries to kill it in the Conference Report this fall. Since then more than 6,400 donors have contributed almost $400,000.
Every member on the list has received over $3,000 from grateful donors, but some have been given way over that. People have asked me why some congressmembers-- like Barney Frank ($11,717), Lloyd Doggett ($9,173), Anthony Weiner ($9,836), Dennis Kucinich (7,622), Donna Edwards ($7,457)-- have wound up with so much more money than some of the others. After all, 60 of them signed Grijalva's letter to Sebelius clearly stating that they "stand in strong opposition to your statement that the public option is 'not the essential element' of comprehensive reform. The opportunity to improve access to healthcare is a onetime opportunity. Americans deserve reform that is real-- not smoke and mirrors. We cannot rely solely on the insurance companies' good faith efforts to provide for our constituents. A robust public option is essential, if we are to ensure that all Americans can receive healthcare that is accessible, guaranteed and of high-quality. To take the public option off the table would be a grave error; passage in the House of Representatives depends upon inclusion of it... a final proposal for the President's signature, MUST contain a public option."
Generally speaking the members with the most donations and the highest totals are the ones who have spoken out the most forcefully during the recess. Barney Frank's contributions shot to #1 after a Larry King Show YouTube went viral (over a million views) showing him answering a crazed and delusional teabagger comparing President Obama to Hitler. GOP propaganda whore Rush Limbaugh pushed Barney's donations even higher when he went off on a snide homophobic tirade the next day.
Similarly, the way Lloyd Doggett handled a disruptive mob of teabaggers at his town hall meeting early in the month won him a great deal of admiration from progressives, not just in Texas but across America. Anthony Weiner's aggressive and spirited defence of the Public Option on Morning Joe bumped him through the roof.
Donna Edwards' unimpeachable record of leadership has been an inspiration for progressives inside and outside of Congress. Last week she reiterated her commitment to real healthcare reform:
I just want to be absolutely clear-- comprehensive reform must include a robust public health insurance option. Otherwise, we're just tinkering around the edges and run the risk of giving even more power to the already too powerful insurance and pharmaceutical industries and their overpaid CEOs. I am unequivocal, unwavering, and unapologetic about my support of a robust public option-- in and outside of the Congress. Indeed I appeared on the CBS Evening News just this week urging Democrats to move forward on healthcare reform, including a robust public option, with or without Republican support since they seem more interested in the politics of taking down President Obama than healthcare for millions of Americans.
It is important that we stay focused on getting a robust public option included in the House version of the bill-- nothing watered down. As a progressive member of the House of Representatives, I can't spend time guessing or speculating about what the Senate will do. I do know that if we don't do our work to get a strong bill out of the House, we won’t be able to beg, borrow or steal a robust public option from the Senate. And, the naysayers and opponents of reform know this-- they know what's at stake. That's why they've tried to use August to kill reform. With your help, it hasn't worked and it won't work.
To accomplish our goal, we must be vigorous advocates for a public option that uses the Medicare provider network, starts immediately without triggers, and has a payment system that encourages quality patient care. We're almost there, and that's why it will take your voices outside of Congress and those of us inside to encourage our colleagues and our President to be courageous to the end. I hope you will continue to join me in this fight for comprehensive health care reform.
No more tinkering.
No more dictates by the big insurers and pharmaceutical companies.
No more deceptions and distractions.
Let's fight for a robust public option to ensure quality, affordable healthcare and lower costs for everyone and provide transparency and accountability. I know we can do this. I will keep fighting, but I need you to keep fighting with me.
Friday Steve Kornacki at PolitickerNY emphasized how powerful Jerry Nadler's message on health care has been and Nadler is assigning credit to the grassroots efforts inspired by Darcy Burner's epic speech.
“If they try to get a bill through the Senate with 60 votes without a public option, it won’t pass the House,” he said. “We will make sure it doesn’t pass the House.”
Other House progressives have been making similar threats, and Nadler admits he’s not sure how seriously the House leadership and the White House have been taking them-- until now.
He described a conference call this week for all House Democrats in which “people who you’d be surprised at” spoke up and told Pelosi they’d reject any bill without a public option. It was only a few weeks ago, after she struck her deal with the Blue Dogs, that Pelosi seemed to sneer at the threats of progressives.
But now, Nadler said, “I think she’s probably going to take that more seriously.”“We’ve got to draw the line somewhere,” he added. “And this is where we’re drawing it. And we have to draw it here. We probably should have drawn it a little closer in.”
So what happens, I asked Nadler, if the House is ultimately presented with a bill with a cop-op provision instead of a public option-- and if the White House and House leadership then tell progressives that it was the best they could do and that if it fails, the Obama presidency might be sunk?
“They can’t allow it to come to that situation, because I’ll vote no,” he replied. “They cannot allow it to get there, and that’s what we’re telling them now. If it comes to that, enough members, I think, will vote no. And they certainly don’t want to test that.”
Strong stuff, huh? Yesterday's biggest recipient of netroots money on our page was Maxine Waters, who sent an unequivocal message to the Democratic Leadership that the line in the sand is for real. She spoke at a town hall meeting in a part of L.A. where teabaggers and nightriders don't venture and she made it crystal clear that without a public option she will oppose whatever the Insurance Industry and their congressional shills try shoving down our throats. I doubt there's much Emanuel can do to her-- except take her off the White House Christmas card list. Addressing President Obama directly, she reminded him that "[t]he people of this country elected you and gave you a Democratic majority in the House and the Senate... Yes, we know that you are a nice man, that you want to work with the opposite side of the aisle. But there comes a time when you need to drop that and move forward. We're saying to you, Mr. President, 'Be tough. Use everything that you've got. Do what you have to do. And we have your back.'" As for the corrupt members of the House of Lords... I don't think Rep. Waters will have their backs any time soon.
"Not only are we going to do everything we can to organize and put pressure on the senators-- some of whom are Neanderthals-- we're going to say to the president, 'We want you to use every weapon in your basket in order to get those senators to do what they should be doing,' " Waters said.
So... if you haven't said thanks yet, I'd recommend today would be a good day to think about Maxine Waters, Jerry Nadler, Donna Edwards, Barney Frank... and any of the other members you've heard speaking out forcefully about the public option. You can donate to one or two or as many of the 65 members of the House who have promised to stand firm as you'd like at the Blue America page.








Login or Register to post comments.
if ya look at the BIG picture...
Let's help this get momentum...
Corporate Personhood challenged in Supreme Court.
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/9df...
This is at the heart of all the crap that's going on.
on it.
my corporate manhood I won't contact the site monitor.
HA!
I love these people. Real Democrates not DLC dinos!
I love your "Democrates" typo -- it sounds like a Greek name -- it'd be a good pseudonym for someone, pronounced deh-MOCK-ruh-tees...
The one thing I keep thinking about this corporation as person crap is this: If corporations pay corporate taxes and not personal taxes, how can they be considered a person, with the same rights and privleges afforded a person?. Evidence already exists they are corporations (paying the lower tax rate) and not persons (who pay the higher tax rate).
The notion that campaign contributions by corporations to political parties AND more importantly, politicians and that said donations, AKA bribes are protected under the 1st amendment.
That is also a big part of the larger problem...
read the senate version of the HC bill..it has a BIG GIMME for the insurance companies in that they are only required to payout 65% of the profits---when they now pay out 80%....This is like the 'donut hole' and the 'non negotiated drug prices' we were given in the last bill...All of which are causing many of our older people to decide between eating and taking their meds!
Call the gang of six and tell them what you want..1.866.220.0044. or do not want !
gee, I wonder whom she's referring to? Methinks the Senate, perhaps, and especially the members in the Gang of Six. You know, those ones who are beholden to their benefactors (no, not the voters): the insurance companies. Let's see: Ben Nelson, Kent Conrad, Max Baucus, and others, such as Blanche Lincoln, Mark Pryor. Feel free to list others. So, folks, let's make: Blanche blanch, Ben bend, Baucus caucus (with the 'correct' group), and take the 'Con' outta Conrad.
Don't forget Mike Ross.
and toss Ross.
Unbelievable to see how absolutely stupid and uneducated the Reslug party of just say "NO" is to everything, but do obstruct everything Prez. Obama does.
It's wonderfully symbolic. Really, it is.
But pour symbolism (and a few pennies) into one hand, and MILLIONS of dollars of HIP lobby money into the other, and see which fist closes tightest.
I was re-watching the Frank video and discovered this video in the "Related Videos" section. Makes me want to lose my mind. Even for YouTube, the comments--not to mention the video's 'description'--are pretty terrible.
I apologize if this is off-topic. I am just reminded of what the stakes are.
During my life time I thought I would never feel more betrayed and hopeless as under LBJ. After the great hope of Kennedy. Although his great society programs did a huge amount of good, the "red scare" and the escalation of and destruction caused both public and private by Viet Nam was a terrible shame on this country. Then there was Nixon. I didn't think there could ever be a worse president in my life. Ford gave him a pass that set a awful president. A short glimmer of hope came from Carter but we paid for our past sins in the middle east. Reagan out did Nixon at every turn and I never did and still don't understand the mythology when there are facts that show a clear criminal and destructive presidency continued by Bush Sr. Clinton at least stopped car from flying off the cliff at 150MPH. In the final analysis Clinton did more harm than good. The country's IQ dropped about 20 points with the election of Bush Jr. and everyone with a loud voice and willing to lie got to tell the country what was happening from day to day. The country kept getting more and more dumb for about 6 of his 8 years as his adminstration did everything in their power to kill the dream of the USA. Obama's election was several million votes closer than makes any sense, but this health care "debate" is the dumbest conversation this country has ever had. I have never been closer to saying "you win", I am to tired to repeat the truth to your lies over and over and over again. If at this point if the country can't tell the difference then fine let the dream of the founding fathers die here and now. Maybe it will spring up again somewhere and have a more deserving people that will pay attention long enough to work.
The baby boomers are the dumbest bastards this country has ever produced. And the Gen-Xer's are not far behind.
These two pampered spoiled generations of Americans are so freaking stupid, that after 8 years of GWB, it only took a couple of weeks of Fox and talk radio nutjobs (screaming bullshit yet again), to turn them against their own beneficial healthcare reform.
Accept it. It's difficult, but you will feel better.
This country is owned, operated, and run by a tiny group of super-rich corporate fascist global elites. They know they can get the chumps to drink cyanide if they want too. Just say "socialism" (after you have stolen 60 trillion yourself), and the morons will be out in the streets with their guns protesting that the elites have not taken it all, and they better come and get it before them libruls give some to the homeless family down on the street corner.
Until these two generations are outnumbered by the new demographic voters, this fascist government will continue. Unfortunately, I won't be around to see the rebirth of the America I once knew, but I do believe the younger generations will put an end to this bullshit eventually.
The Reagan zombies and their economically self-destructive, bigot idiot supporters will eventually lose. It is inevitable.
if you think the new whipper snapper generations are going to be less corporatized in the ever-expanding corporatocracy, you are less cynical than i.
i'm a gen-x'er, and i look at the branded youth of the next generation with great sadness and concern. i fear that they are so ingrained in corporate-speak, that their entire social construct is dependent on consumerism, commodification, and a need for constant and instant gratification that the corporate puppet-master is nearly invisible to them. i hope i am wrong.
You have GOT to read The Family by Jeff Sharlet. He spent years delving into this group, the most famous of which right now are the C Street adulterers, Ensign, Vitter, Sanford, and others.
But those guys are just fluff compared to what the Family has been doing since 1935. They have infiltrated top government agencies and departments around the world as well as in the U.S., and have had heavy influence in the U.S.'s involvement with right-wing dictators for decades.
The "left's" treatment of LBJ is a prime example of what plagues the Democratic party to this day. President Johnson had no choice but to do what he did in Viet Nam ... and the war probably killed him ... it certainly broke his spirit.
People should realize the simple fact that had President Johnson allowed Viet Nam to fall to the dreadful 'commies', (and without US intervention it would have quite quickly) he would never have been able to desegregate the south, he never would have been able to create medicare, medicaid, community mental health clinics, etc. etc. etc.
The republicans would have used the "loss" of Viet Nam just like they used the "loss" of China in the fifties to destroy the Roosevelt coalition. Had he turned his back on Viet Nam, President Johnson wouldn't have had the political capital to do a damned thing.
President Johnson was the last president this country had who did one single damned thing for working class people. And what he accomplished was truly amazing. To hear people who should know better compare him to the likes of nixon, reagan and bush is disgusting.
I just missed going to Viet Nam myself ... but considering that had we not gone into Viet Nam, we would still live in a racially segregated country without ANY form of socialized medicine, I would fight in another war like Viet Nam any day in order to advance our society as much as the greatest president of my lifetime advanced this country in the 60s. That's what those kids in Viet Nam died for... so President Johnson could create a government that fought poverty, racism and needless death due to lack of access to medical care.
I can't think of another war that resulted in as much good for the country.
Thank you Lyndon Baines Johnson for all you did for America. It's a damned pity that those of your own party don't have the sense to know that your work on behalf of the average American surpassed even Roosevelt's...and that the price of those accomplishments was Viet Nam.
If Obama was one half the man Lyndon Baines Johnson was, he'd have already passed single-payer.
and the Dims will pay (Snaps fingers) this much attention to your appeals.
This "Clap louder! Send money! We can save Tinkerbelle" campaign is almost as cynical as the Pukes obstructionism, because the final 'solution' is already baked into the bread.
We're gonna have a national mandate to purchase private insurance at whatEVER premium the HIPs decide...
why do we have to pay our representatives to do the right thing?
is the money to help them with their respective reelection campaigns in 2010?
Because corporations pay them to do the wrong thing and money is the only thing that matters in America. Part of growing up is understanding that if you want to live here. It is also valuable to realize that congressmen are not "leaders." They are order-takers.
Well, isn't that special. 210 real democrats have to tell 50 bluedog f**ktard cokesuckers that they will stop their republican agenda.
The same agenda and party the people overwhelimingly in two elections said "we hate these assholes" to.
The ironic thing, is if health care doesn't get passed, it will be the bluedog assholes who will lose their seats over it. Most liberals will win easily in their districts - having fought the good fight.
Conrad, Baucus, Nelson and the others of their ilk, should be stripped of any committee assignments until they quit spewing their corporate fascist bullshit.
They're are certain issues which define what political party you belong to. This is one of them. Anybody who would sacrifice the American people's welfare for bribery dollars, can just go and put a fucking "R" next to their name.
... my hat is off to the Repugs... not one senator is for health insurance reform although I'm sure a few would vote for one. But they stick to the party line.
Now we have the Wimpocrats that DO have the majority and can pass any insurance bill the want but behave like 60 monkeys trying to fuck a football.
And it's no wonder their approval ratings is lower than whale shit... gotta be the most dysfunctional organization on the planet.
I think it's very nice that the Democrats are standing up for the middle class. I assume we still have some middle class people? Now, which party is standing up for the post-middle-class? We know that not everyone can work, and that there aren't nearly enough jobs for all who can. Our last Democratic president took an ax to the New Deal (note: a quaint policy that was vital to creating/strengthening the vast middle class we once had). The social safety net was shredded, homeless shelters were shut down, food pantry shelves are bare.
For the past 30+ years, our poverty agenda has consisted of "go get a job." During these decades, taxpayer dollars provided corporations with tax relief ("We pay taxes so the rich don't have to!"), on the theory that corporations would use this money for job creation. They did indeed create new jobs -- in Mexico, Taiwan, Russia, Argentina, Saudi Arabia, Yugoslavia, Korea ...everywhere except the US. When families have no food today, it's kind of hard to wait another 30 years in hopes that job creation will eventually trickle down to them.
So, which party is representing these Americans?
Login or Register to post comments.