TOPICS

Specter-Bunning1_c49c5.jpg

There were no votes in the Senate yesterday. But there were plenty of fireworks. The biggest news of all was Arlen Specter's (R-PA) declaration of war against organized labor (and honor). In 2007 Specter was the only Republican to vote against the Republican filibuster against Employee Free Choice. It didn't do any good because the Democrats only mustered 51 votes, instead of the 60 needed. But one of those votes they needed was the then hospitalized Tim Johnson, a working family supporter from South Dakota who is now ready to vote for Employee Free Choice. And 7 anti-working family Republicans have been replaced by pro-working family Democrats. Instead of Wayne Allard, Colorado elected Mark Udall; Norm Coleman was defeated in Minnesota, although more on that below; Liddy Dole was ousted by Kay Hagan in North Carolina; instead of reactionary Pete Domenici New Mexico has Tom Udall; Oregonians replaced violently anti-labor Gordon Smith with ultra-pro-workers Jeff Merkley; I don't remember if Ted Stevens is in prison or not yet but Mark Begich is the new senator from Alaska; New Hampshire dumped Chamber of Commerce shill John Sununu for Jeanne Shaheen; and Mark Warner replaced John Warner in Virginia.

The math says that if Ted Kennedy is healthy enough to vote and Al Franken gets seated and all the Democrats-- including Evan Bayh's anti-Obama bloc-- all continue to back the bill (even WalMart's cowardly Democrats, Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor), then Employee Free Choice passes if Specter sticks to his guns. With today's craven and cowardly announcement by Specter, more worried about his primary challenger from the fringes of the Republican right than about his own dignity or, more important, Pennsylvania working families, the Democrats will either have to put off the vote until after the 2010 election or persuade either Olympia Snowe (R-ME) or retiring George Voinovich (R-OH), neither of whom is a union-hater, to switch their votes.

Actually, there is another possibility-- however implausible. Everyone in Washington-- and Lexington-- knows there's no love lost between vulnerable Kentucky Senator Jim Bunning and Kentucky's other Republican senator, Miss McConnell, and that Bunning has been threatening to retire and let Democratic Governor, Steve Beshear, replace him with a Democrat-- the 60th vote. According to today's Lousiville Courier-Journal that scenario may actually be moving along. Bunning went nuts today (again), complaining that McConnell is sabotaging his efforts to raise money for his re-election battle.

U.S. Sen. Jim Bunning accused Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell again today of trying to derail his fundraising efforts, this time by trying to raise money for his own campaign account just as Bunning is gearing up his own efforts for his race next year.

...Bunning said his decision on whether to stay in the race will probably made in the next three months.

After earlier setting a goal of raising $2 million by the end of June, Bunning has since scaled that back, saying that McConnell and Sen. John Cornyn, the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, have harmed his fundraising efforts.

The third piece of this puzzle is the Republican Party conspiracy to keep Al Franken from taking his Senate seat. They've helped finance idiotic challenges and a frivolous lawsuit by loser Norm Coleman and today Coleman says he'll appeal all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Coleman and the GOP know he has no chance to win but they just want to delay Franken's seating, in no small part because of Employee Free Choice.

Yep, keeping workers from forming unions is that important to the big money behind the Grand Obstructionist Party. Here's the press release from AFL-CIO President John Sweeney:

Today’s announcement by Sen. Specter-- a sponsor of the original Employee Free Choice Act who voted for cloture in 2007-- is frankly a disappointment and a rebuke to working people, to his own constituents in Pennsylvania and working families around the country.

The fact is the Employee Free Choice Act has more support than ever-- large majorities in both houses of Congress, the President and Vice President, 73 percent of the public. We will continue to work with
Democrats and a number of Republicans to create commonsense solutions to the decades of corporate power.

We do not plan to let a hardball campaign from Big Business derail the Employee Free Choice Act or the dreams of workers.

There are deep flaws in our labor laws, as Sen. Specter acknowledged today. The freedom to join together and bargain with employers for fair wages and better benefits is critical to rebuilding our middle class-- and now is exactly the time to do it, as we begin to revive our economy in a way that works for everyone. In the coming weeks, we will be escalating our campaign and finding the best ways forward to a balanced, strong economy.

Andy Stern, president of the SEIU, had a similar statement today:

In the middle of this economic crisis, passing the Employee Free Choice Act is exactly the right thing to do to give workers the chance to level the playing field. Majority Leader Reid said today, and as even Sen. Specter acknowledges, we need strong labor reform. Now more than ever, America's workers need a choice, free from intimidation and harassment, to bargain for job security, better wages and health care. Our President, Vice President and majorities in both houses of Congress share this goal, and we will not stop in our efforts to achieve it.

In an essay Senator Specter recently wrote for the Harvard Law Review, he states that for people like himself, "finding a practical solution is more important than political posturing." That's why we're dismayed by those who say they support the democratic process, yet refuse to allow meaningful debate and a democratic vote on critical legislation like the Employee Free Choice Act.

It's simple: If you support democracy, you should support the right to debate legislation that could improve the lives of millions of working Americans, pump $49 billion into the economy at a time when we desperately need it, and that's supported by the vast majority of the public.


(Cross-posted at Down With Tyranny.)



Login or Register to post comments.

25 comments

You can bet your bottom dollar that the unions will wield their power in unseating Specter now. This was a humonguous mistake for him at a critical time when his seat is threatened. Arlan will be brought down and out of office for this one.

Specter's is spitting in the wind with his hypocrisy and flip-flop in order to assuage his paltry 28 percenters. 28% DOES NOT an election win, Arlan. Na...na...na....na....hey...hey...hey....good-bye!

Isn't this what Spector always does?

specter voted for the employee free choice act in 2007 now he does a flip-flop. well, it's time to get this voted upon. in my opinion the BUSH administration/right wingers want people to BORROW to get into
the middleclass vs. being able to BARGAIN their way into the middleclass. this is part of the debacle we're
in currently. wages have declined in the last 4 years. corporations/elites want to have all the loopholes,
cheap labor,off-shore tax havens,bailouts,monopolies but everyday working class get little to nothing.
employees need the right to form a UNION if they want. NOW some companies will threaten layoffs. i say so be it. we will be looking at inflation in a few years, people need to have income that keeps pace with cost of living with the ability to save for retirement.

He'll have to change his name to Spectator after'10

He'll be on the outside looking in

blowing corporate America for decades.

Never had a REAL job.

-Specter has a habit of voting the opposite of his words.

I don't get it. 73% of the public supports the Employee Free Choice Act, and the Repugs and business people act like its some scary radical legislation.

I guess the conservative anti-labor set is so used to billing their ideology as mainstream, common sense and conventional wisdom that they've bought into their own press releases.

Best wishes to everyone fighting for this Act.

Eat Shit...not wishing you dead...but...His will be done.

I apologize for the fact that this man is my Senator. He bravely fought cancer but is a political coward. Here in lies the problem with politics. Politicians vote on what will get them elected.

There is at least one other scenario. That would be for the Senate to vote on the bill. There is nothing in the US Constitution which creates the filibuster or creates the need for 2/3 of the senate to end debate and permit a vote on the measure.

I don't understand why the Senate doesn't just eliminate the filibuster.

Yep, keeping workers from forming unions is that important to the big money behind the Grand Obstructionist Party.

You bet it is. Second only to decertifying the ones already in existence.

And I prefer: "Greedy Oleaginous Perverts" myself

re-election.

He's worried about a wackloon fuckard flying monkey challenger from the Right, with which I believe Pennsylvania is embarrassingly well-supplied. And no lack of sympathetic ears in that part of alabama that stretches between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh...

...also known locally as "Pennsyltucky".

Howie Klein: .. the Democrats will either have to put off the vote until after the 2010 election or ..

19 of the 41 Republicans in the Senate are up for re-election in 2010.

* Richard Shelby of Alabama
* Lisa Murkowski of Alaska
* John McCain of Arizona
* Mel Martinez of Florida -- will not run
* Johnny Isakson of Georgia
* Mike Crapo of Idaho
* Chuck Grassley of Iowa
* Sam Brownback of Kansas -- will not run
* Jim Bunning of Kentucky
* David Vitter of Louisiana
* Kit Bond of Missouri -- will not run
* Judd Gregg of New Hampshire
* Richard Burr of North Carolina
* George Voinovich of Ohio -- will not run
* Tom Coburn of Oklahoma
* Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania
* Jim DeMint of South Carolina
* John Thune of South Dakota
* Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas -- may retire to run for Gov.
* Bob Bennett of Utah

That's 19 of them. Almost half the 41 Republicans in the Senate.

We target the easiest to pick off and fund a concerted effort to rid our country of them and their stench. I still have a job (a good one), my husband has about three or four jobs and we will very happily donate to get rid of these bottom dwellers.

a need for legislation allowing Americans to join unions? No unions in the US? What exactly is the positive to Americans joining unions in the current economic climate? Higher wages? Right now, existing unions are being forced to give up, so where are the positives?

at least makes sure that I get a lunch and a couple of breaks during the 12+-hour days that I work, and they help insure that the hospital in which I work does not load nurses to the point that patient care is compromised.

where I live, I'm spoiled. We already have labour laws, so I don't understand the need for unions at all. We have the freedom to join any union we want. Surprisingly few do. Although if you are hired at a unionized company, you have to join the union, or you are not hired. You have no choice whatsoever. Always found that one odd.

A quick search came up with these numbers for comparison.

The result of a constant downward pressure from legislation and PR control:

1983 - 20.1% of the US workforce was unionized.
2008 - 12.4% unionized, up actually from 12.1% in 2007.

Remove public sector workers from the equation and only 7.6% of the private sector workforce is union, about 1 in 14.
Might explain why, after adjusting for inflation, the average wage has been in decline since the early 70s.

For some reason a majority of the US population think this is a good thing, having something to do about communism vs Reagan worship.
Why would you want to earn more if you can just charge it on your credit cards. What? You still have to pay it back? Whoops, is my face red!

Canada has about 39% of the total workforce unionized.

Just for the hell of it.
Union membership as percent of workforce in:
Sweden: 78.0% (2003)
Belgium: 55.4% (2003)
Brazil: 35.4% (1995 only)
United Kingdom: 29.3% (2003)
Japan: 19.7% (2003)
United States: 12.0% (2006)
Korea: 11.2% (2003)
France: 8.3% (2003)

Now quit goofing off and get back to work!

"The third piece of this puzzle is the Republican Party conspiracy to keep Al Franken from taking his Senate seat."

So, a Republican president who looses an election get's seated but a Democratic Senator who wins an election can't get seated. That's Republican "democracy" and Republican "free elections" for ya!

The Republican establishment in Pennsylvania absolutely hates this guy, and he is likely to face a primary battle that will make his personal battle against cancer look like child's play. That's what this latest switch is all about anyway.

Plan for an almost certain Democratic pick-up in the 2010 Pennsylvania Senate race.

the 1000 radio stations that form the backbone of the GOP.

they do the groundwork for all GOP strategy, threatening, intimidating, enabling politicians in both parties , especially in the red states with a disproportionate number of senators.

much of the public pressure the republican 'moderates ' like specter get is from the daily pounding they get from dittoheads. same with the limbaugh dems.

if the unions finally realized how badly they get trashed and lied about every day by limbaugh and hannity and sons they might realize their biggest opposition, the power center of the republican party, is the local talk radio station. there are a 1000 of them across the country attacking everything union every day and until americans realize that and start calling and complaining and boycotting and picketing their local RW talk station the GOP will continue to wield much more power than their public support warrants.

I'm developing an ulcer waiting for Franken to be seated.

So, are you saying that the Senate Minority leader isn't man enough for you?

25 comments

Login or Register to post comments.