TOPICS

The Real Culture of Entitlement

culture of entitlement_8fa84.jpg

David Sirota at OpenLeft:

In light of Arlen Specter's party switch, Rachel Maddow had former Rhode Island GOP Sen. Lincoln Chafee on her show last night to discuss political moderation and contested primaries. During the interview, Chafee (perhaps inadvertently) articulated a very crass sense of entitlement that courses through our political Establishment:

"...the tremendously successful fundraising juggernaut that pours the money into these primary races against moderate Republicans in particular. I saw it happen to me in 2006, largely responsible for my loss in the general election...this is America, anybody can run for office. It's the money that pours in that really makes these primaries destructive...Primaries run-up your negatives and they cost you money."

While I'm not defending the ideology of the right-wing Club for Growth that helps raise money for conservative primary challengers, I am saying that Chafee's comments are gross. He's pretty clearly saying that incumbent lawmakers and other cornoated frontrunners shouldn't have to face primaries - and if they do have to face them, those primary challengers are doing something wrong for having the nerve to be well-financed.

Remember, Chafee is not only a guy who had his senate seat handed to him by his father,* he is actually complaining about his supposedly Big Money primary challenge in 2006, despite his having outspent that primary challenger by more than 2-to-1. So what he's really saying is that he believes what makes primaries "really destructive" is money "pouring in" specifically to challenger candidates, but supposedly, it's not "really destructive" or bad if an incumbent like him "pours in" enough D.C. cash to grossly outspend and crush all primary challengers.

That is the definition of entitlement.

Sirota has it absolutely right. The politicos talk a big game about the "evils" of entitlements and how they inexorably push a closer and closer to a *gasp* "Socialist Nation" ('cuz, you know, the Danes are just miserable about their Socialist Democracy)--Damn those Welfare Queens and Freeloading Seniors! They're dragging the country down....aren't they?


Well, frankly, no. What's dragging this country down is this insular notion within the Beltway that those on the inside are entitled to be there and those of us outside should just not worry our little heads about the sophisticated and complicated world of Washingtonian politics. You silly little voters--it doesn't matter that you wanted Ned Lamont as the Democratic candidate in Connecticut or that Arlen Specter couldn't survive a Republican primary challenge. They BELONG in Washington, and if it involves changing the rules of the game, then we should all be grateful that they do it to stay where they absolutely should be.

Honestly, it's sickening. There's nothing Democratic or democratic about these moves. But now that those insiders have decided to flip off us voters, I think it's time we outsiders show them whose boss. We absolutely should mount a progressive primary challenger to Arlen Specter. And moreover, I think we need to take a MUCH closer look at the so-called leadership in Congress. Reid -- in theory -- has the fabled 60 votes he wants. Now I want to see some leadership. In an email I received from someone who has worked hard for the Democratic Party:

It is Harry Reid's responsibility to pass a Democratic agenda. We can measure Spector's performance in this case. But the real thing we need to measure is the amount of insistence and control that Harry Reid exerts as Majority Leader.

We have not had a filibuster proof Senate for more than 30 years...And without checking my history, the 2 times we had that kind of majority in the Senate, have been times of remarkable progressive achievements.

It is his responsibility. He should stop complaineing and deferring to their delicate sensibilities and start acting like a leader who has a historic oppurtunity before him. He shouldn't blow it.

What happens with Spector and others in the future is in Harry Reid's court.

No one is entitled to be in Congress. And I think it's time we reminded them of that.



Login or Register to post comments.

22 comments

Titian thought he was entitled to titillate.

Keep those pitchforks sharpened and handy, folks.

be tested.

)O(

Testes.

we should be keepin a list and checkin it twice.............can't wait for Franken.................

Unless we get campaign finance reform, this all won't matter. The corporations can continue to over-fund the elections of their most loyal tools to the exclusion of any other candidates. If we're going to fund the primary challenges of competitors, we need to make sure that every one of them is committed to advancing campaign finance reform no matter how long it takes. Only by populating Congress with members who, regardless of their positions on other issues, recognize the need to get corporate money out of Congress, do we have a chance of getting real democracy back.

How subversive.

Especially our law enforcement! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWF4x01MkzE&eu...

Horrors!!

And tax payer money for free helmets for citizens instead of billions for wars for big oil, defense contactors and Halliburton? Why that's socialism!

Besides, our police treat our citizens much better http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSJUN7q7f2w

When Franken finally gets seated Reid has no fu*king excuse and he better not put his tail between his legs ever again. How do we exchange him for a stronger Democrat?

You're assuming Reid actually wants to enact progressive/liberal legislation. My hopes aren't quite so high.

HA HA HA HA HA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAA

"sense of entitlement" prevalent in Beltway Politicians...wooot wooot....breaking news breaking news!!!

They are somehow automatically owed this, because they desire this. Typical.

. . . maybe Chaffee was making the rather obvious, trite observations that s***loads of money really F***s up the political process; at the risk of compounding one obviously trite observation with another, when can we have a supreme court which will recognize there is a Constitutional distinction between protected "free speech" and deciding to spend s***loads of money to skew the political process?

The Real Culture of Entitlement?!?!

For starters, the Oligarchs who lost vast fortunes through greed, fraud and stupidity, but now are having those diminished fortunes replenished thanks to their puppets in the beltway.

Not one question about the Oligarchs from the brain dead 'journalists' in attendance at the 'press conference' last night.

The Oligarchs know the real culture of entitlement.

They are the Welfare Kings. The politicians are their bagmen (and women).

Are just vile repulsive creatures.
Why would anyone vote for these scum?

I agree completely. But Specter is going to kick off sooner than Reid if all things play out according to table of probabilities.

Of course the Devil DOES TAKE CARE OF HIS OWN.

We need grass roots liberal challengers in a LOT OF DISTRICTS.

And Nevada is a good one to concentrate on. All that gangster money and collusion. Money laundering at it's finest... and all controlled by the republicans. Try and find a liberal station?

Only Doug Basham exists there. And Reid ignores him too.

does the major enabling.

they all get money-it's the limbaugh hannity megastations in the red states that do most of the groundwork and create the well coordinated misinformed dittohead armies that give these idiots the fake constituencies they need for cover.

"That is the definition of entitlement."

Absolutely, Nicole.

Look, even if the Democratic establishment has promised Arlen Specter a free run in the primary, that doesn't mean anybody needs to pay attention to them. Arlen Specter is NOT a Democrat, and Democratic voters will stay home in droves if his sorry Republican ass is appointed to our party's ticket by the likes of Harry Reid.

Time to bypass these assholes and find a real Democrat, a liberal, that doesn't mind stepping on Harry Reid's toes.

Do the justices relish the irony? Free speech should be interpreted to mean speech that doesn't cost chingas of coin to be heard (i.e., really free). The current process has evolved to protect only the speech of the monied interests. Political advertising, which is mostly lies anyway, is equivalent to giving the best-funded candidate (the corporate shill) a bullhorn to drown out the speech of his less-financially endowed opponents. Ban political advertising. Save democracy.

22 comments

Login or Register to post comments.