Go Home

It sounds like a really good idea. But really, this is bribery. And it wouldn't have been necessary to give them everything they want if Geithner and pals put reasonable conditions on the bank bailout in the first place:

The Obama administration is developing a major initiative to tackle the economic and political problem of unemployment by getting federal bailout funds into the hands of small businesses.

The proposal involves spinning off a new entity from the Troubled Assets Relief Program that could give banks access to the government money without restrictions, such as limits on executive pay, as long as they use it to make loans to small businesses. But officials are not yet certain whether carving the program out of TARP would be the best way to lure banks to participate in small-business lending, said sources familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the plans were not final.

As an alternative, officials are prepared to ask Congress to modify TARP itself, easing the pay limits and other restrictions that would be imposed on small-business lenders taking the money, the sources said.

Since the summer, the administration has been facing an uncomfortable dynamic in the economy. The ranks of the jobless have been growing, while big financial firms that got taxpayer bailout money have been thriving. In response, officials have been trying to recast TARP as aid for Main Street rather than Wall Street.

Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner told a congressional oversight panel Thursday that TARP would focus on aiding small-business lending, community banks and homeowners struggling to keep up with their mortgage payments, and he hinted at the new program.

Banks are "very reluctant to come and do business with the government and they're concerned that, if they come, they will be stigmatized and they will be subject to the risk of conditions in the future that might make it harder for them to run their businesses," Geithner told the TARP oversight panel. Solving that problem, he added, is "going to be something we cannot do on our own. It's going to require some help from Congress to help deal with those basic concerns."

Elizabeth Warren, who heads the oversight panel, chided Geithner for taking so long in setting up several other small-business lending initiatives, two of which were announced last spring.

"It's not news to anyone that small-business lending is important," she said. "Small businesses are closing every day. But Treasury has now announced three plans and clearly has not gotten the job done."

Thank you in advance for your donation!

Share This Post

Link To This Post


16 Comments
Handypants's picture

"It sounds like a really good idea. But really, this is bribery. And it wouldn't have been necessary to give them everything they want if Geithner Paulson and pals put reasonable conditions on the bank bailout in the first place:"

TARP was started under Paulson not Geitner.

:)


"I know that there are people who do not love their fellow
man, and I hate people like that!
" ~ Tom Lehrer (1928 - )

i believed in obama and i voted for him, BUT

he is doing for business and corporate America
just what bush and the gop would do.....

hand them a hammer and let them beat the
American public in the head over and over....
this has got to fucking STOP!

obama and the democrats campaigned on CHANGE....
i am NOT SEEING any YET!

Savagewinston's picture

Doing an economic story then rattle your tin cups..

That is the most unclassy displays I have seen in my life..

Tombo's picture

Obama and his Wall Street whores Geithner and Summers have done nothing besides reward the banks and Wall Street firms who, through their incredible greed and dishonesty, bankrupted millions of americans. He hasn't enacted or even proposed one serious reform or regulation for the financial sector.

A lot of people still don't want to believe he's not what he campaigned as. Well, he's not. His actions speak for themselves.

MountainMan23's picture

Instead of haggling over how big a cut the bank CEOs can take when distributing loans of US Taxpayers Money ..

Why can't the US Govt make the loans directly to small businesses?

Why pay a middleman?


When will government of the people, by the politicians, for the corporations perish from this Earth?

Not soon enough!

Samson-'s picture

great quesiton

and i would follow that up with: why can't the govt start a new WPA?

Samson-'s picture

"give banks access to the government money without restrictions, such as limits on executive pay, as long as they use it to make loans to small businesses"

without public approval, without support from the taxpayers, the bush admin (fully supported by little timmy geithner from his crib at the NYFed) "bailed out" wall st for more than it was worth. so, for all practical purposes, we, the taxpayer, should have a controlling stake in the mega-banks. but, no. we don't. any and all mechanisms that could have been forced onto the bank-failures were "negotiated" (see, congress was bought off) away. now, the obama admin, is going to cater to the banking interests in order to get the banks to do what they should have been forced to do initially.

That is ironic. Banks have to be paid to do that which most everyone assumes is their primary business - make loans. With all of the deregulation which has taken place though, loans alone don't make enough money for them. Their primary purpose has become unprofitable.

Q: What do you get when you cross Harry Potter with Henry F. Potter?
A: A banker that makes money by magic.

Handypants's picture

"I know that there are people who do not love their fellow
man, and I hate people like that!
" ~ Tom Lehrer (1928 - )

first? If they really wanted small businesses to get the money they would have made it availible through a Government loan program. Instead they gave it to these vampire banks as if they were going to do the right thing, what a joke. I am not voting for this stinking Obama again, I don't care if Palin run against him, we deserve her.

mudshark's picture

Not even the Republicans deserve her.
It's just they're to thick to see it.


What is your conceptual, continuity?

Truthseeker12's picture

I think Obama is going to have a worse approval rating then Cheney by the end of his one and only term.

Tax the Rich's picture

I voted, hoping once and for all to put an end to the DLC repuke-lite wing of the democratic party. That's why I never would have voted for corporate Hillary, and had reservation's about Obama. We needed to take back FDR's party of the people!

This guy wasn't president-elect for 48 hours, before he installed all of the 1990's Clinton-flunky republican-lites, and pushed out the overwhelming majority of real democrats like Dr. Dean.

I cannot stomach to even look at Obaughtma on the telly anymore. What a wasted opportunity. What a sellout this guy turned out to be.


If I were a psychopath, I would join the republican party, and get in on the gravy train taking the Teabircher morons to the cleaners.

TJM's picture

Much as I enjoy listening to Prof. Warren, she doesn't need to chide Geithner to set up a program when one already exists. The Small Business Administration has been guaranteeing loans made through commercial banks for decades
The current programs do not provide a 100% guarantee and there are requirements that the lender must adhere to, but the Prof is off base here. Modify the existing existing program if you want, but, good grief, not another one.

Tax the Rich's picture

Begging the criminal's to share OUR money that WE gave them after they stole and squandered all our savings.

You can't make this stuff up.


If I were a psychopath, I would join the republican party, and get in on the gravy train taking the Teabircher morons to the cleaners.

Comments are closed on this entry