Politico Says Rove Deposed Yesterday by Judiciary Committee in U.S. Attorneys Firing
By Susie Madrak Wednesday Jul 08, 2009 3:00pmIt took two years, but it finally happened - thanks to an agreement with the White House that deposing Rove would not infringe on executive privilege. Now everyone wants to know: What did Karl say? And don't you wish you were the fly on the wall?
Former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove was deposed Tuesday by attorneys for the House Judiciary Committee, according to Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), the panel’s chairman.
Rove’s deposition began at 10 a.m. and ended around 6:30 p.m, with several breaks, Conyers said.
Conyers would not comment on what Rove told congressional investigators, what the next step in the long-running Judiciary Committee investigation would be or whether Rove would face additional questioning.
“He was deposed today,” Conyers said in an interview. “That’s all I can tell you.”
Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin, declined to confirm or deny that his client had appeared before the committee. Luskin said there was an agreement that the depositions would remain confidential until they were completed. However, in a court filing Monday, the Justice Department indicated that the deposition set for this week would be the committee's last.
Conyers’ panel had first subpoenaed Rove in 2007 as part of its probe into the firing of nine U.S. attorneys. But the Bush White House, citing executive privilege, refused to make Rove or White House Counsel Harriet Miers available for any deposition.








Login or Register to post comments.
... hopefully he was not distracted from his wife possible indictment on corruption charges.
That will show Rove!
indicted and has pleaded guilty. All that is left is the sentencing. I hope she gets some jail time!
but our betters are not held to the same laws
as us plebians.
Karl will not have to pay for his actions - that just wouldn't be fair.
"I don't recall"
May that oily turd rot in a cell.
?
I've got a portion that's been leaked:
Conyers: So, did you do it?
Rove: No.
C: Oh, c'mon. You did it, didn't you?
R: No.
C: Sure is nice weather, we're havin...DID YOU DO IT?
R: No.
It goes on like that for pages and pages...
I'd hate to see the smirk on that fat f*cks face as he was sitting there. I wonder if he'll deign to mention this on his next Fox appearance?
I'm guessing Rove managed some deal where he would only testify behind closed doors?
There are some situations in which summary execution should be allowed.
"Sorry Sir but answering that question would vold my right to executive privilege as such I can't answer it"
Over and over and over again comes to mind. This is why these people can get away with so much because we the people Have to go if congress calls on us. Rove and others No they get to make deals.
Rove was the criminal brain behind numerous corrupt scandals that ruined the lives of many innocent people. This butt hole worked tirelessly to destroy our Democracy and install a permanent Republican Fascist Party. There are too many to list and one which has Rove's fingerprints all over it and gets very little recognition is the California Governor Recall disgrace which put arch evildoer Schwarzenegger in power. Life in prison is too good for this dirty rat.
"I plead the 5th." He said this 124 times.
I just hope it wasn't another one of those lame "not under oath" proceedings that democrats are known for.
My first thought when I hard about it too! I could think of nowhere to go,but C&L to find out.
I see elsewhere on the web that he was deposed, but no where does anyone say whether he was under otah or not. If not under oath then Conyers killed the investigation as this fatfuk liar will be able to point to his deposition as if it were fact, Fox will trot it out as fact, and the news will swallow it as fact.
I've never understood. Why is that even an option?
Should not EVERYONE who testifies before Congress be required to be under oath?
So if you're not under oath, it's ok to lie!
...to someday see that fat-assed turdblossom marched to the pen in legirons and manacles, and just knowing that he will be sombody's bitch.
Turdblossom is a liar, so we will never know.
What the fuck difference does that make?
Why do Republicans feel the need to not comment on the most BASIC OBVIOUS things? Why do Republicans always have to be so SUPER DUPER SECRET about things?
Login or Register to post comments.