Yet Another CBS Exclusive Debunked -- This Time, About The ACA Website

What the hell happened to CBS News?

Why doesn't CBS just change its name to Fox2 and be done with it? Man, I still remember when they had a respected news operation. In the rush to compete with the new media world, they had to get this half-assed story out there. And the switch from news as a public service to just another profit point for the networks encourages this kind of hackery:

On Monday night, CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkisson came up with what looked like a significant story: “Memo warned of “limitless” security risks for HealthCare.gov.” As the story and on-air broadcast alleged, the person entrusted with putting together HealthCare.gov was “apparently kept in the dark about serious failures in the website’s security. Those failures could lead to identity theft among [those] buying insurance.”

How did Attkisson know this? “CBS News has obtained the first look at a partial transcript of his testimony.”

Which is like saying you’ve got the exclusive on half the story.

To consume Attkisson’s story is to freak out about HealthCare.gov. The scoop here is that Henry Chao, Healthcare.gov’s chief project manager at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), somehow didn’t know about a Sept. 3 memo warning of issues on that troubled government Web site. The transcript to which Attkisson gained access spells out some serious alleged difficulties with the site.

From the televised report: “In excerpts we’ve obtained, Chao was asked about a memo that outlined important security risks discovered in the insurance system. Chao said he was unaware of this Sept. 3 government memo written by another senior official at CMS. It found two high-risk issues which are redacted for security reasons. The memo said, ‘The threat and risk potential to the system is limitless.’ The memo shows CMS gave deadlines of mid-2014 and early 2015 to address them.”

Via Attkisson’s treatment, Chao comes off looking clueless about a critical aspect of HealthCare.gov.

In her narrative, a Republican lawyer questioning Chao asked him if he found it “surprising” that he’d never seen that memo before. Chao replied, “‘Yeah . . . I mean, wouldn’t you be surprised if you were me?’ He later added: ‘It is disturbing. I mean, I don’t deny that this is . . . a fairly nonstandard way’ to proceed.”

In a hearing of the House oversight and government reform committee today, Attkisson’s story received something of a public fact-check. Rep. Gerald Connolly, apparently rankled by the CBS News piece, launched a series of pointed questions at Chao. The short take from the exchange is this: The CBS News report looks completely misleading. Here’s a selective summary of what Connolly discussed with Chao:

Connolly: Correct that Republicans presented you with a document you hadn’t seen before? Chao: Correct.

Connolly: Correct that the document indicated that there were two “open high-risk” findings in Obamacare
exchange? Chao: Correct.

Connolly: Correct that someone leaked parts of your transcript to CBS News? Chao: “It seems that way.”

Connolly: Correct that the document discusses risks relating to two Web site modules on dental plans and qualified health plans? Chao: Correct.

Connolly: Correct that neither of those modules is active at this point? Chao: Correct.

Connolly: Correct that the Sept. 3 memo did not apply to the Obamacare marketplace? Chao: Correct.

Connolly: Correct that modules do not contain any personally identifiable information on consumers? Chao: Correct.

“So when CBS Evening News ran its report based on a leak, presumably from the [Republican] staff, but we don’t know — of a partial transcript — excerpts from a partial transcript — they said the security issues raised in the document, and I quote, ‘could lead to identity theft among buying insurance,’ that cannot be true based on what we established in our back and forth. Is that correct?”

Chao replied: “That’s correct. I think there was some rearrangement of the words I used during the testimony and how it was portrayed.”

About Susie Madrak

Comments

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.