Go Home

111th Congress

3 documents found in 0.001 seconds.

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (168)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (1042)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Here are the truest words you'll ever hear on this or any Sunday news show, courtesy of Bob Schieffer at Face the Nation: Washington DC is just like high school.

Just think about this:

Distractions such as vanity and the mania for gossip and the short attention span that prevents focusing on problems even long enough to try to understand them.

Unbridled meanness toward those who are not part of your crowd. The cliquishness that requires group think - if you don't believe exactly what we believe you can't be part of our crowd. We're right, you're always wrong, and don't confuse us with facts.

An inability to act for fear it will cause a loss of popularity.

Oh, and did I miss old-fashioned jealousy and insecurity, which seems to be a factor no matter the issue.

For those of us who follow politics and reportage in Washington DC, there is no truer statement. You have the kewl kids and the outsiders, and those kewl kids make sure that the outsiders know that they'll never be welcome into the inner circles until they conform to the group. That's why liberal Barbara Boxer stumped for Republican kissyface Joe Lieberman, and the Democrats let him keep his caucus chairmanships despite his campaign support for Republican John McCain. It's why the Debbie Wasserman Schultz won the DNC Chair despite protecting her Republican colleagues in South Florida from having serious electoral challengers. It's why John McCain is on every Sunday show and nobody ever cares that Bill Kristol, Charles Krauthammer, Dana Milbank, Mark Halperin, Liz Cheney and Peggy Noonan are rarely correct in their assessments, but you rarely if ever find Rachel Maddow, Bernie Sanders, Dennis Kucinich or Markos Moulitsas, who are correct more often than not. And don't even get me started on the fact you never see bloggers who have consistently been right, like Digby or our own Amato and Neiwert. We're not the kewl kids and being on the inside of the closed campus of DC High is more important that being informative, correct, analytical or in touch with reality.

That's why the cute jock can be called "courageous" and "brave" for putting together a report that gets an "F" from the rest of the country. And why lying about a sexual indiscretion (without actual sex) to the media is worse than lying to the same media about weapons of mass destruction or not coming clean to the same media about hundreds of thousands of dollars of income from a conflict of interest. The kewl kids decide what transgressions are acceptable and what are not, and it's strictly based on your position in the social hierarchy they rule.

So a rare moment of honesty comes out from this long time stalwart of the high school upper echelon. And then he flips right back into his role as decider of kewl, and casts out Anthony Weiner. Not only that, he declares that anyone still supporting Weiner (who has, as of this writing, not done anything illegal, not been charged with anything and certainly has not been found guilty of anything other than a serious lapse of judgment and sense) is threatening their standing in the high school hierarchy. Try as I might, I found nothing on Lexis Nexus where Bob Schieffer did anything similar to the Republicans when they gave David Vitter a standing ovation on the floor of Congress (the same floor from where he had made dates with prostitutes--an illegal activity--several times before).

I guess being consistent isn't as important as being "in" at DC High.



Mike's Blog Roundup

Whippersnapp: Overdue props for the daunting job of war journalism

Simply Left Behind: Draft Jenna, NotJenna, and other neocon spawn now!

Vagabond Scholar: A cartoon offers a more complex, nuanced perspective on the problems in Iraq than we typically get from Washington, and certainly than we get from Bush or anyone in his administration

The American Mind: A little-known Senate organizing resolution, passed in January, gives Democrats control of the Senate and committee chairmanships until the beginning of the 111th Congress...that's with or without Holy Joe

Booman Tribune: Gen. David Petraeus’s new “surge” plan is committing U.S. troops, day by day, to a much deeper and longer-term role in policing Iraq than since the earliest days of the U.S. occupation. How long must we stay under the Petraeus plan? Perhaps 10 years.

Unqualified Offerings: We must invade Iraq!



Chris Wallace Gives GOP Terminology For Employee Free Choice Act

DOWNLOAD (114)
WMV QuickTime
PLAY (189)
WMV QuickTime

(h/t Heather)

We've known for some time that Fox News is merely the propaganda arm for the GOP. However, they usually couch their partisanship with claims of being "fair and balanced" and token ineffectual Democrats. But Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace was perhaps a little unintentionally forthright about where his loyalties lay in Sunday's interview with House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer on Congress's priority to pass the Employee Free Choice Act.

WALLACE: Big Labor’s top priority is what’s called “union card check” and that would be eliminating the right to a secret ballot in determining whether or not you’re going to organize, unionize a working place. [laughs] I love the way you’re smiling already. Are you going to move on that in the first month?

HOYER: I’m smiling because of the way you phrased it. It’s the Free Choice Act, of course, and what it does is …

WALLACE: Well, “union card check”, Free Choice, both sides have their euphemisms.

HOYER: Of course, and you use one side. That’s why I was smiling…[laughs]

WALLACE: And you used the other.

Sadly, Wallace obviously has access to the GOP talking points soundbytes that the Democrats are never savvy enough to replicate. Nice, neat, and sound sensible if a little weak on facts. "Union card check" sounds like something a Dem-voting life-long union member would be leery of. But Hoyer never retorts in a way that eliminates this fear. The Employee Free Choice Act simply gives the employees the right to decide whether to unionize, rather than the company. It's easy to understand and say, right? But instead, Hoyer gives this mush-mouthed reply:

HOYER: Well, okay, my point being that we believe that one of the problems that has existed in America is that working people have had a very, very difficult time in getting represented by unions in the work place. Work place has resisted that. The NLRB has not been very vigorous in assuring the lack of unfair labor practices. We believe that the employees…if over 50% of them sign and say that we want to be represented by a union, they ought to be able to be represented by a union. Let me say that many, many employers currently, under existing law, recognize such signatures right now and start to bargain and have a union representative.

C'mon, guys, it's bad enough that you go on Fox, can't you do a little prep work to be able to respond to the Republican framing first?

Transcripts below the fold:

Continue reading »