Go Home

Nicholas Kristof

8 documents found in 0.002 seconds.

Just blame the liberals!

Just blame the liberals!

The Problem in Iraq is… liberals. (Just ask a “liberal”)
“These days, the biggest risk may come from the small but growing contingent on the left that wants to bring our troops home now." Is Nicholas Kristof insane? The problem with Iraq is the left? Excuse me. Right-wingers created this insane mess. They control all three branches of government and are determined to make everything worse, having admitted no mistakes and thrown out the people who tried to warn them of their delusions. And Kristof thinks the “biggest risk” comes from liberals? Just what is it he thinks we are going to do to upset this brilliant war effort? Write a really nasty folk-song? (Who would play it?) Next up: Kristof will blame us for Rush’s drug problem. (Is a job requirement for liberal Times columnists to say, “As a liberal, I say “the problem here is liberals” no matter how silly the situation? Did Krugman sign in invisible ink or did they forget this demand because they figured they were only hiring an economist?)...
read on



Sunday Morning Bobblehead Thread

Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn promoting their event, Half The Sky, on the oppression of women.

This Thursday, the CARE organization is bringing attention to the plight of women worldwide with an event called "Half The Sky", based on the book by Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn. HuffPo:

Half the Sky LIVE captures an evening of discussion, musical performance, and the premier of Woinshet, a short film directed by Marisa Tomei and Lisa Leone. The narrative documents the trials and tribulations of an Ethiopian woman who surmounts the dual challenges of discrimination and violence. Her story is referenced in Half the Sky

While this event is meant to bring attention to the oppression of women in developing countries, events this week have left me feeling that we here in the US are not all that far ahead either. I think there is a lesson that could be taken from the Half The Sky event: Equality is a core value of democracy. Once you get past the jingoistic nationalism that simply declares the US "the best" without attaching any actual meaning to the word, it is incumbent upon all of us to push for an egalitarian society that provides opportunities to all of us, regardless of gender, or race, or religion, or sexual identity. Because we all hold up half the sky.

One of the most marked disparate in American society is our representation in Washington. Forgive me, but there are far too many rich, straight (or at least, presenting themselves as straight) white men making decisions that affect all of our lives. And that's reflected in the bobbleheads as well. How many times have I given you the line up to show one white man after another, opining on issues without any reflection of what that means to the rest of us? This week, at least, we have Nancy Pelosi--who suffers the slings and arrows of being demonized and discounted, as much for her gender as for her politics--on two separate shows to discuss the health care battles. Unfortunately, in both cases, she goes head to head with two of the whitest and least egalitarian members of congress: Sen. Lamar Alexander and Sen. Mitch McConnell. Sigh. We've come along way, baby? Nuh uh. We got a long way to go.

ABC's "This Week" - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.; Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.

CBS' "Face the Nation" - House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md.; Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn.; Sens. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., and Tom Coburn, R-Okla.

NBC's "Meet the Press" - Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.; White House health reform director Nancy-Ann DeParle; Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va.; Marc Morial, president and CEO of the National Urban League; Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla.

NBC's "The Chris Matthews Show" - Panel: David Ignatius, Kelly O'Donnell, Kathleen Parker, Michael Duffy. Topics: Real Cost of Health Care: Is The Prize Worth The Pain for Obama? Romney Off And Running: Does He Have The Right Stuff for 2012? Meter Questions: Is Mitt Romney the Most Likely GOP Nominee? YES: 9 NO: 3; If unemployment remains near 10%, can President Obama still get some credit for a jobs push? YES: 1 No: 11.

CNN's "State of the Union" - Pelosi; Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

CNN's "Fareed Zakaria GPS" - George Soros, one of the world's richest men, discusses the economy, banker bonuses, and whether he is satisfied with what the administration has done so far. Then on the GPS panel, two smart Brits with views from the other side of the pond -- is Obama making a comeback?

CNN's "Amanpour" - Ehud Barak: An exclusive interview with Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak. Fresh from a round of high level meetings with U.S. government officials, Christiane asks him about Iran, the Mossad and revelations of the son of Hamas' founder may have spied for Israel.

"Fox News Sunday" - Sens. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., and Robert Menendez, D-N.J.; Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis.

So what's catching your eye this morning?



It's not the fact that they're trying to stop health-care reform by any means necessary that gets to me. (After all, we're now a nation of greed and to the corporate victor goes the spoils.) No, it's the lies they use to manipulate and frighten people that make me despair, because they successfully bring out the worst in people - and keep other people from getting the help they desperately need.

New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof has a heartbreaking tale that illustrates why our present system is the one that's breaking down families:

kristof_8155c.jpg

My friend M. — you’ll understand in a moment why she’s terrified of my using her name — had to make a searing decision a year ago. She was married to a sweet, gentle man whom she loved, but who had become increasingly absent-minded. Finally, he was diagnosed with early-onset dementia.

The disease is degenerative, and he will become steadily less able to care for himself. At some point, as his medical needs multiply, he will probably need to be institutionalized.

The hospital arranged a conference call with a social worker, who outlined how the dementia and its financial toll on the family would progress, and then added, out of the blue: “Maybe you should divorce.”

“I was blown away,” M. told me. But, she said, the hospital staff members explained that they had seen it all before, many times. If M.’s husband required long-term care, the costs would be catastrophic even for a middle-class family with savings.

Eventually, after the expenses whittled away their combined assets, her husband could go on Medicaid — but by then their children’s nest egg would be gone, along with her 401(k) plan. She would face a bleak retirement with neither her husband nor her savings.

A complicating factor was that this was a second marriage. M.’s first husband had died, leaving an inheritance that he had intended for their children. She and her second husband had a prenuptial agreement, but that would not protect her assets from his medical expenses.

The hospital told M. not to waste time in dissolving the marriage. For five years after any divorce, her assets could be seized — precisely because the government knows that people sometimes divorce husbands or wives to escape their medical bills.

“How could I divorce him? I loved him,” she told me.

“I explored a lot of options with an attorney here in town,” she added. “The attorney said, ‘I don’t see any other options for you.’ It took about a year for me to do the divorce, it was so hard.”

So M. divorced the man she loves. I asked him what he thought of this. He can still speak, albeit not always coherently, and he paused a long, long time. All he could manage was: “It’s hard to say.”

Long-term care constitutes a difficult and expensive challenge in any health system. But the American patchwork, full of cracks through which people fall, has a special problem with medical expenses of all kinds bankrupting couples.

A study reported in The American Journal of Medicine this month found that 62 percent of American bankruptcies are linked to medical bills. These medical bankruptcies had increased nearly 50 percent in just six years. Astonishingly, 78 percent of these people actually had health insurance, but the gaps and inadequacies left them unprotected when they were hit by devastating bills.

M. still helps her husband and, quietly, continues to live with him and care for him. But she worries that the authorities will come after her if they realize that they divorced not because of irreconcilable differences but because of irreconcilable medical bills. There were awkward questions from friends who saw the divorce announcement in the newspaper.

“It’s just crazy,” she said. “It twists people like pretzels.”



One can deride Huckabee without 'scorning people for their faith'

In his latest NYT column, Nicholas Kristof returns to a subject he’s covered before: the unwarranted deriding of evangelicals.

At a New York or Los Angeles cocktail party, few would dare make a pejorative comment about Barack Obama’s race or Hillary Clinton’s sex. Yet it would be easy to get away with deriding Mike Huckabee’s religious faith.

Liberals believe deeply in tolerance and over the last century have led the battles against prejudices of all kinds, but we have a blind spot about Christian evangelicals. They constitute one of the few minorities that, on the American coasts or university campuses, it remains fashionable to mock.

Scorning people for their faith is intrinsically repugnant, and in this case it also betrays a profound misunderstanding of how far evangelicals have moved over the last decade.

I can appreciate Kristof’s point, but this is unpersuasive. First, the Huckabee comparison is flawed. Judging Clinton on her gender is ridiculous. Judging Obama on race and ethnicity is offensive. But when Kristof hears people disparaging Huckabee at cocktail parties, I suspect he’s hearing people mocking Huckabee’s ideas — which deserve to be fair game in the midst of a presidential campaign.

After all, the former Arkansas governor has been pretty far out there on the fringe. He rejects modern biology. He thinks wives should "submit graciously" to their husbands. He’s equated homosexuality with bestiality. He’s publicly endorsed “quarantining” AIDS patients; he’s boasted that God is directly helping his presidential campaign; and he’s said that if a man and a woman live together outside of marriage, they’re engaging in a “demeaning ... alternate lifestyle.”

And if the intelligentsia ridicule these beliefs, they’re guilty of “intolerance” and “scorn” for the faithful? It’s the moral equivalent of racism and misogyny? I don’t think so.



Mike's Blog Roundup

onegoodmove: Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris respond to Nicholas Kristof's expressions of dismay that they would actually be so impolite as to criticize religion.  Guess Kristof hasn't heard about this, this, or this

Simply Left Behind: An elegant solution or an onerous tax?

Attytood: The right's sleazy strategy for deflecting bad news about Iraq

The Enigmatic Paradox:  Echoes of history...Pearl Harbor to Baghdad

The Arabist: Fish 'n chips-eating surrender monkeys?

This Modern World: Pictures of U.S. officials shaking hands with murderous thugs now higher quality



Kristof challenges-O'Reilly to go to Darfur

Nicholas Kristof is challenging Bill to go to Darfur with him. The bloviator backs out with Jonah Goldberg like reasons. I guess he never heard of satellite coverage.
Kristof: (reg required)

"After Mr. O'Reilly denounced me in December as a "left-wing ideologue" (a charge that alarmed me, given his expertise on ideologues), I challenged him to defend traditional values by joining me on a trip to Darfur. I wrote: "You'll have to leave your studio, Bill. You'll encounter pure evil. If you're like me, you'll be scared ... and you'll finally be using your talents for an important cause."

A few days ago, I finally got my answer. Mr. O'Reilly declared in his column: "I do three hours of daily news analysis on TV and radio. There's no way I can go to Africa."...read on

Kristof finishes with:

"If you want to help, send e-mail to sponsorbill@gmail.com or snail mail to me at The Times, and tell me how much you're willing to pay for Mr. O'Reilly's expenses in Darfur. Offers will be anonymous, except maybe to the N.S.A. Don't send money; all I'm looking for is pledges. I'll post updates at nytimes.com/ontheground."



Mike's Blog Round Up

Rolling Stone: Brian Schweitzer, Democratic Governor of Montana, speaks Arabic and spent years building irrigation projects in Saudi Arabia and Libya. He has some thoughts on Iraq.

Sid's Fishbowl: A biased look at media bias

Donkephant: You might be a terrorist if...

Petrelis Files: Why the hell has the U.S. Justice Department still not posted an explanation, rationale, press release or briefing paper on its web site about the National Security Agency domestic spy scandal?

fbihop: Remember ANWR?

Media in Trouble: Even a blind pig might find an acorn...NYT's Nicholas Kristoff put's O'Reilly's phony Christmas controversy in perspective.



Who Needs Assult Weapons?

By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF

MERIDIAN, Idaho — If you've been longing for your very own assault rifle and 30-round magazine for the next holiday season, you're in luck.

President Bush, sidestepping a promise, is allowing the ban on assault rifles and oversized clips to expire on Sept. 14. So at a gun store here in Meridian, a bit west of Boise, the counter has a display promising "2 FREE HIGH-CAPACITY MAGAZINES."

All you have to do is purchase a new Beretta 9-millimeter handgun and you'll receive two high-capacity magazines - on the condition, the fine print states, that the federal ban expires on schedule.

President Bush promised in the last presidential campaign to support an extension of the ban, which was put in place in 1994 for 10 years. "It makes no sense for assault weapons to be around our society," Mr. Bush observed at the time.

These days Mr. Bush still says that he'll sign an extension of the ban if it happens to reach his desk. But he knows that the only way the ban can be extended on time is if he actually urges its passage, and he refuses to do that. So his promise to support an extension rings hollow - it's not exactly a lie, but it's not the full truth, either.

Mr. Bush's flip-flop is surprising because he has generally had the courage of his convictions. Apparently he's hiding from this issue because it's so politically charged.