Go Home

Traitors

21 documents found in 0.001 seconds.

Right Wing Bloggers Name Their 25 Worst Figures In America

There they go again...

The blog Right Wing News asked "more than a hundred bloggers" who they thought were the worst people in American history. The results may shock you! Or maybe not. [..]

This question was put out to over 100 crazies with internet connections:

Out of all the gangsters, serial killers, mass murderers, incompetent & crooked politicians, spies, traitors, and ultra left-wing kooks in all of American history — have you ever wondered who the worst of the worst was?"

[..]Here are the results, from 43 bloggers who responded:

23) Saul Alinsky (7)
23) Bill Clinton (7)
23) Hillary Clinton (7)
19) Michael Moore (7)
19) George Soros (8)
19) Alger Hiss (8)
19) Al Sharpton (8)
13) Al Gore (9)
13) Noam Chomsky (9)
13) Richard Nixon (9)
13) Jane Fonda (9)
13) Harry Reid (9)
13) Nancy Pelosi (9)
11) John Wilkes Booth (10)
11) Margaret Sanger (10)
9) Aldrich Ames (11)
9) Timothy McVeigh (11)
7) Ted Kennedy (14)
7) Lyndon Johnson (14)
5) Benedict Arnold (17)
5) Woodrow Wilson (17)
4) The Rosenbergs (19)
3) Franklin Delano Roosevelt (21)
2) Barack Obama (23)
1) Jimmy Carter (25)

I love the framing of the question: murderers, terrorists and "left-wing kooks". And what did these mental giants come up with? is Osama Bin Laden on the list? No. But FDR is. And he's WORSE than assassin John Wilkes Booth and domestic terrorist Tim McVeigh and traitors Aldrich Ames, Benedict Arnold and the Rosenbergs. And of course, the worst person in the history of the country is Jimmy Carter. Sorry Obama, you just missed the top spot.

Sweet Jesus, do these people have anything but bumper sticker slogans in their heads? The list is replete with such nonsense and brainless smearing (really, Jane Fonda and George Soros? Quick, someone on the right name for us how they have influenced the country. No fair cribbing notes from Glenn Beck).



Ground Zero Out

The preposterous conspiracy-mongering of "JFK" and the bizarre distortions of "Nixon" were the one-two punch that ended any interest I had in the work of bomb-throwing filmmaker Oliver Stone. So the news that Stone isplanning a film about 9/11 prompted no reaction from me besides "I'm SO not in that theater."

But the culture wars never rest, and thanks to Wolcott I see that various winger bloggers are already in full-froth mode over the idea of Stone laying his paws on the subject. But before anyone gets too hysterical about politically-motivated filmmakers desecrating Ground Zero, let me remind them of a piece of tripe called "DC 9/11: Time of Crisis," a mendacious love letter to George W. Bush that aired on Showtime in 2003. For me, the high point of this claptrap was seeing Bush (played by Timothy Bottoms, possibly atoning for "That's My Bush!") stoutly declaring, "If some two-bit terrorist wants me, he can come get me right here!" We all saw "Fahrenheit 9/11" and we all saw the video footage of what George II did on that awful morning -- he sat in a classroom staring into space in doe-eyed, vapor-locked panic. The 9/11 attacks are part of history and it's any filmmaker's privilege to use history as Silly-Putty, just as it's my pleasure to call him on it -- if you ever have a spare hour, just get me started on the way "Gangs of New York" romanticized the Draft Riots. But Oliver Stone is going to have to go a long way to make a film even half as nauseating as "DC 9/11: Time of Crisis." planning a film about 9/11 prompted no reaction from me besides "I'm SO not in that theater."

But the culture wars never rest, and thanks to Wolcott I see that various winger bloggers are already in full-froth mode over the idea of Stone laying his paws on the subject. But before anyone gets too hysterical about politically-motivated filmmakers desecrating Ground Zero, let me remind them of a piece of tripe called "DC 9/11: Time of Crisis," a mendacious love letter to George W. Bush that aired on Showtime in 2003. For me, the high point of this claptrap was seeing Bush (played by Timothy Bottoms, possibly atoning for "That's My Bush!") stoutly declaring, "If some two-bit terrorist wants me, he can come get me right here!" We all saw "Fahrenheit 9/11" and we all saw the video footage of what George II did on that awful morning -- he sat in a classroom staring into space in doe-eyed, vapor-locked panic. The 9/11 attacks are part of history and it's any filmmaker's privilege to use history as Silly-Putty, just as it's my pleasure to call him on it -- if you ever have a spare hour, just get me started on the way "Gangs of New York" romanticized the Draft Riots. But Oliver Stone is going to have to go a long way to make a film even half as nauseating as "DC 9/11: Time of Crisis."
Over to you, wingers.

 
 

Another example of liberal commie bastid hate

loadedmouth

Scum. How dare people play politics and point out the truth?!  These traitors just don't quit. Stop making sense! I'm not heaaaarrring yooooouuuuu!

 

NASA Probe Penetrates Tom Cruise's Ego      that one blog

NASA scientist were jubilant yesterday when a probe launched over six months ago successfully penetrated the ego of Hollywood star Tom Cruise.

Dr. Dale Huston, Project Director for the Ego Impact mission said that scientists will now have an unprecedented look at what goes into the make-up of a superstar. “We’ve had our theories, but now we’ll have some solid facts,” said Dr. Huston. “We’ve always known there is a real core of acting talent there but Cruise’s recent erratic behavior had scientist puzzled. He fired his long time publicist, has been jumping up and down on talk show couches and claimed that the fields of psychiatry and pharmacology are frauds, his ego lost stability as it expanded.” 

Over to you, wingers.



Will Tom Brokaw take down Karl Rove?

frost nixon redux by dg_160ca.jpg

The Frost/Nixon book by James Reston, Jr. gets a makeover.

When it turned out that Nixon -- "the man who committed the greatest felony in American history" -- was never going to stand trial for his crimes, it fell to journalists to provide the conviction-by-proxy that justice, democracy and the American people so desperately needed.

It is now thirty years after Frost gutted Nixon on national teevee, sparing us (or so we thought) yet another, inevitable Nixonian rise from yet another political grave followed by yet another giddy, fascist Conservative wilding through the streets of America.

But far from having learned from our mistakes, we instead repeated them.

On steroids. And cut with Hulk gamma-irradiated monkey growth hormones.

We got the Bush Regime, arguably the most incompetent, corrupt and outright-treasonous Administration in American history. A regime so reckless, savage and gleefully bestial that it made the career-Nixon-hating Hunter Thompson actually pine for the good old days of Tricky Dick:

"I miss Nixon. Compared to these Nazis we have in the White House now, Richard Nixon was a flaming liberal."

And, like Nixon, it is more than likely that not a single one of the smirking traitors who nearly wrecked this country will ever spend a day in jail.

Instead they remain lodged in our flesh like so many ricin pellets, oozing their poison into our national bloodstream, waddle from one fawning audience to another, worming their way into major media outlets, or dispatching their degenerate children and underlings out into the world the keep their poison pumping.

They soiled our good name, bankrupted the country, shredded the Constitution and kicked the crutches out from under the global economy on their way out the door, and while it is sometimes hard to focus on them through the flames of the world they set on fire, we must.

We must, because if we do not formally, culturally shun them, break with them and come to look back on them forever with horror and shame, they and their imitators and fanboys will fester. And without cleaning and binding up the deep and ugly wound they slashed across our national soul, their disease will continue to rage and rot us from within.

Which brings us to Sunday.

In four days, one of the principle architects of this depraved Administration will be on teevee.

Pimpin' a book.

A book which Media Matters has documented is full of lies.

He will be interviewed for approximately 30 minutes by Famous Journalist, Tom Brokaw.

You perhaps see where I'm going with this...

Rove, of course, is a known quantity; a conscienceless thug who would be rotting in prison cell over in the Better Universe.

But we don't live in the Better Universe. We live here, which means this is about Tom Brokaw.

If he has any reporter left in him at all, on Sunday he has a chance to do some old-fashioned, journalistic public service flogging. He has been handed on a platter of the finest Sterling the opportunity to do what none of us out here in the cold, bloggy world will ever even come close to getting a shot at: demanding answers from Karl Rove face-to-face. To act as an advocate on behalf of the public's right to know. To honorably "afflict the comfortable" and restore a small portion of the trust which the Fourth Estate has spend the last few decades frittering away so easily and cheaply; an cynical erosion of one of the most critical, load-bearing pillars of democracy that reached its nadir during the Age of Bush.

If he has any reporter left in him at all, he can help to lay the Foundations of History on which the judgments of future generations will rest.

If not -- if Tom Brokaw lets this oily little Judas slip through his fingers in the name of the clubby, malignant courtesy that elitist Villager insiders habitually extend to their lodge brothers, then the the best and possibly last opportunity to bring Karl Rove to some kind of public book for his crimes against democracy will have passed.

And like that...

...he'll be gone.

Which gives us just a few, short days to email, blog, Twitter and in every other way we know how contact Tom Brokaw and NBC and let them know that "We The People" are tired of having a Freedom of the Press for which so many millions of Americans have fought and died used a puke funnel for everything from the tribulations of drunken celebrities to long-discredited Neocon drivel, but never for anything so genuinely vital to the survival our democracy as holding some of its worst predators to account for their predations.

On your marks.

Get set...

Cross-posted from here.



The Politico is at it again. It now proclaims that the Democrats are in trouble and the Republicans are on the offensive like it's 2004.

Bolstered by historical trends that work in the GOP’s favor -- midterm elections are typically hostile to the party in power -- and the prospect of the first election in a decade without former President George W. Bush either on the ballot or in office, Republicans find themselves on the offensive for the first time since 2004.

They actually said that. They haven't been attacking like maniacs since then? I guess calling Dems traitors and terrorist sympathizers is a compliment. As Glenn Greenwald takes their analysis apart, guess who their sources are that they use as proof that it's 2004 again.

Who are the sources for Politico's exciting announcement of a GOP resurgence? A grand total of three: "GOP pollster Whit Ayres," "GOP pollster John McLaughlin," and "Republican pollster Neil Newhouse," all of whom assure us that the signs point to imminent Republican triumph and Democratic doom.

Just read Glenn's piece because he thoroughly debunks them.

Kos also notes a big traffic plunge for them:

But hey, Drudge will likely give the Politico a link. And given their traffic trends, you can bet that's a major motivator. Yup, Politico has lost over 1M unique monthly readers since its peak in February. There's nothing like Drudge bait to help turn that around.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (1207)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (2747)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Yesterday on his Fox News show, Glenn Beck was conversing with Sen. Jim DeMint, and I guess he decided to get all respectable or something, because he uttered the following:

Beck: I will tell you that I -- we discussed this on the radio program earlier today, that, um, a lot of people are calling this, where was it? In the Washington Examiner today. That they -- that people are saying that "Cap and Trade" is "Cap and Traitor". They're actually -- people are starting to view people -- both Republicans and Democrat -- as traitors to the country. Which I think is over the top. That's a very specific definition.

Funny thing, because just 24 hours before, on the same program, Beck was running a reward poster on his show naming the eight Republicans who voted for the bill "Cap and Traitors." His guest, Kevin Mooney of the (you guessed it!) Washington Examiner, called them "traitors" too. Guess that wasn't "over the top" then.

Because Glenn Beck went through a time warp or was abducted by aliens or something and everything he said the day before was now actually said by a whole other, different Glenn Beck. Something like that.

You can't make this stuff up. It's like watching a bad old science fiction movie, I tell ya.



Joe the Plumber questions Obama's loyalty to the US

I'm so sick of this freaking clown already. Of course everyone is entitled to their opinions, but this guy is a full-blown McCain surrogate now and McCain should be forced to repudiate this kind of divisive crap.

ABC:

"McCain has fought and bled for our country, loves our country," said Joe Wurzelbacher, aka "Joe the Plumber," who has campaigned throughout Ohio with and on behalf of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. "There's too many questions with Barack Obama and his loyalty to our country. And I question that greatly."

Fox News' Neil Cavuto tried to clarify: "You're not doubting that he's a good American. Or you are?"

"His ideology is completely different from what democracy stands for," said Wurzelbacher.



Good Riddance: Lieberman likely to lose committee chairmanship

Perhaps this is why HolyJoe is now trying to make nice?

The Hill:

Democratic leaders are discussing a major reshuffling of Senate committee chairmanships, according to multiple sources, and the proposed changes include ousting Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) from his coveted chairmanship.

Lieberman, a former Democrat who supports Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) for president, is likely to lose his gavel on the Homeland Security Committee he has chaired since January 2007, say the sources who see him being replaced by Sen. Daniel Akaka (Hawaii), the committee’s third-ranking Democrat.

Memo to Harry Reid and the rest of the Democratic caucus: We may be a big tent, but traitors are not welcome in it. Period.



Joe Lieberman: "Lord knows I have a lot to repent for"

MSNBC-Lieberman_d7a1c.jpg

DOWNLOAD (160)
WMV QuickTime
PLAY (174)
WMV QuickTime

Joe Lieberman acknowledges that he needs to ask for "his maker's" forgiveness after stabbing the Democratic party in the back.

Andrea Mitchell: "We're only hours away from the holiest day in the Jewish calendar. I wish you and your family a good fast."

Lieberman: "Thank you, Andrea. I wish you the same and Lord knows I have a lot to repent for."

Mitchell: I'm not going there, Senator. That's between you and your maker.



The Official Election-Season Guide to the Right-Wing Blogosphere

Roy Edroso of The Village Voice puts together a handy guide to all your favorite far-right whackos of the blogosphere.

Looks like FDL is getting in on the fun with their own reference guide: The Official FDL Election Season Guide to the Left-Wing Traitorsphere



bush-troops.jpg Yesterday President Bush told Congress that they "have a responsibility to fund our warfighters."

icon Download | play icon Download | play

But what about this? AP :

The House minority leader threatened Thursday to get his members to vote against a $96.3 billion spending bill for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan if Democrats persist in plans to attach conditions to the money that would tell President Bush how to conduct the wars.

So after President Bush essentially won reelection by claiming that John Kerry voted against funding the troops, and after an Iraq debate where Republicans said 1,000 times that "you can't support the troops without funding the troops," Boehner now says he and the Republicans in Congress will do exactly the same thing they've denounced Democrats as traitors for even suggesting. Once again, for Republicans, they support the troops just so long as the troops are their useful little pawns and props for their cynical political arguments.

Sorry Boehner, no more blank checks.