(Most of) Iraq Votes
By Steve Hynd Saturday Jan 31, 2009 2:00pm![]()
The majority of Iraq has voted in provincial elections today, with a very minimum of violence, as I had hoped. Which is great news but unsurprising given the massive security lockdown mounted for the event. Razorwire cordons, security checkpoints, closed airports and a total ban on vehicular traffic in cities - all just to have an election. Still, that it happened at all is encouraging, even if far from the shining victory the American right are hailing it as. I hate to rain on their victory parade but there are a couple of flies in their Mission Accomplished" ointment.
Not least, of course, that such elections might never have happened at all if the Bush administration had had its way. Despite the popularity nowadays of the conservative meme that Bush wanted to bring democracy to Iraq, Paul Bremer, head of the CPA, had wanted to simply keep US-appointed tame politicos in power. But Ayatollah Sistani demanded real elections with thinly veiled hints of a general Shiite insurrection to go with the Sunni-led insurgency if no elections were held, and a quick historical revision swifty ensued.
But there are still deep-seated problems in Iraq which these provincial election's won't touch, or will actually make worse. The Kurdish North didn't participate and neither did the disputed region of Kirkuk. Iraqi troops and Kurdish peshmerga have already faced off there a few times and most analysts see Kurdish aspirations as the primary future source of violence. Then there's the resurgent Sunni minority, where the old and entirely undemocratic tribal power structure is set to be the election winner. And among Shiites, factional infighting which has fractured Maliki's own coalition heavily, looks to be another potential source of future violence. We may not know the full results for a month or more and there are going to be divisive allegations of intimidation, vote-rigging and double-crossing to navigate.
These elections are a good thing, but they're not a universal panacea. Still, the American Right wants to have its cake and eat it. They want to pretend that provincial elections mean "victory" while getting ready to blame only Obama if Iraqi social fractures ignored by Bush for so long lead to more violence later.








Login or Register to post comments.
"They want to pretend that provincial elections mean "victory" while getting ready to blame only Obama if Iraqi social fractures ignored by Bush for so long lead to more violence later."
It's just what Professor Limbaugh ordered; a way to blame Obama.
give Iraqis what they want.
...now lets pack up and get the hell out of there.
you can feel it. the (R) wants claim victory and anything after that is obama's fault. i'm still NOT sure what a "victory" is in iraq......beyond less casualities.
George Galloway's take on the current elections in Iraq. I like how he talks to Norm Coleman in this clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrdFFCnYtbk
By the way. I wish C&L would post more updates on the Coleman/Franken race up in Minnesota. And George Galloway kicked ass like few Americans had ever seen. That's how you stand up to Republican crap heads. And 2 years before the Iraqi Journalist threw his shoes at George w., Stephen Colbert did the equivalent as an American Journalist when he was in the presence of the President.
George Galloway says in the above clip that we didn't even meter the oil out of Iraq as we were stealing it. Interesting and more hard hitting than most of the news coming out of the talking heads of today.
Coleman a new one I emailed him and said,"Now I know what a Scotsman has under that kilt!"
He emailed me back! I couldn't believe it! But he thanked me for the best laugh of the day.
This man is astounding!
I know there's nothing worn under the kilt...
It's a' in perrrfect wurrking order!
Regards, C
I must get to Scotland!
that there were stories when the scots fought the british and the favoite place to ambush them was at their loo.
This was back in the day where a button fly was your only option. Quite easy to take them prisoner or kill them while they were trying to get their pants back up. He felt scots were quite superior not to have this problem.
Who knows, maybe he was just trying to make me laugh, but if so it worked.
just watched that Galloway vid you posted...that was sheer brilliance. He should be Prime Minister.
Ahhh yes, the day Stephen went to the Press Corp Dinner...that's a night I'll never forget.
leave it to obama and america's better nature that we might exit an iraq that's completely a shambles.
under an army of occupation?
USers routinely scoffed at 'elections' held in the Eastern Bloc when it was occupied by the Russians.
This 'election' is but another piece of USer propaganda.
its shike mon shike!
Granted Obama is accountable from this point forward, but in no way should the Bush administration be held less accountable or less responsible for its actions, products, decisions and policies during the previous eight years. Only they should have to explain and be answerable for the consequences of their policies that we see today.
Political language. . . is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.
~George Orwell
I have come to admire Al-Sistani as being a shrewd and class act.
Soon after Bush declared the Iraq war a Victory aboard the Abe Lincoln; Iraqis set up provincial elections and Bush and company shut them down and even killed some people in protests over that little maneuver.
While Iraqis protested Bush appointed some Baathists, the people hated, back in to their old positions.
It's about time the Iraqi people get to decide whom they want as leaders in their communities. I anticipate many of those leaders will not be welcomed by the US Military command.
Login or Register to post comments.