Go Home

kristof

8 documents found in 0.001 seconds.

Just blame the liberals!

Just blame the liberals!

The Problem in Iraq is… liberals. (Just ask a “liberal”)
“These days, the biggest risk may come from the small but growing contingent on the left that wants to bring our troops home now." Is Nicholas Kristof insane? The problem with Iraq is the left? Excuse me. Right-wingers created this insane mess. They control all three branches of government and are determined to make everything worse, having admitted no mistakes and thrown out the people who tried to warn them of their delusions. And Kristof thinks the “biggest risk” comes from liberals? Just what is it he thinks we are going to do to upset this brilliant war effort? Write a really nasty folk-song? (Who would play it?) Next up: Kristof will blame us for Rush’s drug problem. (Is a job requirement for liberal Times columnists to say, “As a liberal, I say “the problem here is liberals” no matter how silly the situation? Did Krugman sign in invisible ink or did they forget this demand because they figured they were only hiring an economist?)...
read on



Mike's Blog Roundup

RaceWire: Best photo from the 9/12 Tea Party

Harold Meyerson: The "values" of the largest private-sector employer in the U.S. are shaping our national economy -- and that's a very bad thing.

The Agonist: Monsanto

uggabugga: Interested in a deep-think read?

Multi Medium: Healthcare perspective from Kristof

OFF THE BEATEN PATH: Delusions of Lucidity, Republican Dirty Tricks, Blue Heron Blast, Alien Truth



Mike's Blog Roundup

onegoodmove: Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris respond to Nicholas Kristof's expressions of dismay that they would actually be so impolite as to criticize religion.  Guess Kristof hasn't heard about this, this, or this

Simply Left Behind: An elegant solution or an onerous tax?

Attytood: The right's sleazy strategy for deflecting bad news about Iraq

The Enigmatic Paradox:  Echoes of history...Pearl Harbor to Baghdad

The Arabist: Fish 'n chips-eating surrender monkeys?

This Modern World: Pictures of U.S. officials shaking hands with murderous thugs now higher quality



Nickalas Kristof on Darfur

Television "dropped the ball" by covering Michael Jackson instead of Darfur
Kristof was on "Reliable Sources," today and talked about the media's lack of coverage on Darfur.
icon Download | play -WMP icon Download | play -QT

(Full transcript from CNN)

KRISTOF: Yeah, sure. And Sudan, I think, has done a great job about keeping journalists out simply by not giving visas. But this is a little bit different, because we can get visas to Chad, and now there are more than 200,000 people who have fled Darfur and are in Chad and are telling their stories to anybody who will talk to them. I must say that newspapers and magazines, I think, have done a better job in covering this. The people who have really dropped the ball, frankly, is television.

KURTZ: And on that point, could that possibly be because the story is kind of depressing -- many tens of thousands of people dying -- and that it's considered a ratings loser?

KRISTOF: I'm sure that's it. But if we in the media are going to ask for various special kinds of special privileges, as we do, then I think we also have to show some kind of special responsibility. And when the CBS Evening News, last year over the course of the entire year, spends two minutes covering genocide, while the broadcast networks are averaging 28 minutes covering the Michael Jackson trial, then there is something profoundly wrong.



Kristof challenges-O'Reilly to go to Darfur

Nicholas Kristof is challenging Bill to go to Darfur with him. The bloviator backs out with Jonah Goldberg like reasons. I guess he never heard of satellite coverage.
Kristof: (reg required)

"After Mr. O'Reilly denounced me in December as a "left-wing ideologue" (a charge that alarmed me, given his expertise on ideologues), I challenged him to defend traditional values by joining me on a trip to Darfur. I wrote: "You'll have to leave your studio, Bill. You'll encounter pure evil. If you're like me, you'll be scared ... and you'll finally be using your talents for an important cause."

A few days ago, I finally got my answer. Mr. O'Reilly declared in his column: "I do three hours of daily news analysis on TV and radio. There's no way I can go to Africa."...read on

Kristof finishes with:

"If you want to help, send e-mail to sponsorbill@gmail.com or snail mail to me at The Times, and tell me how much you're willing to pay for Mr. O'Reilly's expenses in Darfur. Offers will be anonymous, except maybe to the N.S.A. Don't send money; all I'm looking for is pledges. I'll post updates at nytimes.com/ontheground."



Approximately Perfect

The truest thing Kristof has ever said

Mr. Bush hasn't even taken a position on the Darfur Accountability Act and other bipartisan legislation sponsored by Senators Jon Corzine and Sam Brownback to put pressure on Sudan. Does Mr. Bush really want to preserve his neutrality on genocide?

Indeed, MTV is raising the issue more openly and powerfully than our White House. (Its mtvU channel is also covering Darfur more aggressively than most TV networks.) It should be a national embarrassment that MTV is more outspoken about genocide than our president.

MTV?!?!?

Sigh.



Janis Joplin tribute

Teenage British soul star Joss Stone and a bald Melissa Etheridge electrified the Grammys audience with a gritty tribute to Janis Joplin.

Video

Kris Kristofferson, who wrote the Joplin classic Me and Bobby McGee, introduced the duo. Joplin died of a drug overdose in 1970, aged 27.

“It’s bittersweet,” he said. “She was so passionate about what she did.”

I found that Melissa's performance was tremendous on the Grammys because of her battle with cancer. The issue is not how close she came to emulating Janis, but the fact that she performed at all.



Is the U.S. really"stingy" about helping poor countries?

Land of Penny Pinchers

By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
That accusation by a U.N. official, in veiled form, provoked indignation here. After all, we're the most generous people on earth ... aren't we?

No, alas, we're not. And the tsunami illustrates the problem: When grieving victims intrude onto our TV screens, we dig into our pockets and provide the massive, heartwarming response that we're now displaying in Asia; the rest of the time, we're tightwads who turn away as people die in far greater numbers....

In 2003, the latest year for which figures are available, we increased such assistance by one-fifth, for President Bush has actually been much better about helping poor countries than President Clinton was. But as a share of our economy, our contribution still left us ranked dead last among 22 top donor countries.

We gave 15 cents for every $100 of national income to poor countries. Denmark gave 84 cents, the Netherlands gave 80 cents, Belgium gave 60 cents, France gave 41 cents, and Greece gave 21 cents (that was the lowest share, beside our own).