Go Home

Peter Hoekstra

6 documents found in 0.001 seconds.

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (647)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (1921)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

(A Blast from the past from the incredible C&L archives)

Conservatives can do no wrong in the eyes of the media. Rep. Peter Hoekstra is taking fundraising to new lows by sending out fundraising letters off of the failed bombing attempt of Flight 253 to support his bid at being Governor. He's been very critical President Obama as soon as the plot hit the news.

Yet, in June of 2006, Peter Hoekstra went on FOX News with ex-Senator Rick Santorum and tried to promote pre-1991 type munitions as though they were the types of WMDs Bush and Cheney took us to war with Iraq over. It was so ludicrous that FOX' own reporter Jim Angle debunked their claims.

Colmes: Senator, the Iraq Survey Group, uhh, let me go to the Duelfer Report says Iraq did not have the weapons our intelligence believed were there. And Jim Angle who reported this for Fox News-quotes a defense official who says these were pre-1991 weapons that could not have been fired as designed because they already been degraded.

And the official went on to say that they are-these are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had-and not the WMD's for which this country went to war. So the chest beating that the Republicans are doing tonight thinking this is a justification is not confirmed by the defense department.

Media Matters had more:

During nearly every Fox News program from 5 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET on June 21, Fox News hosts and guests touted the disclosure, announced by Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) and Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-MI), of the existence of hundreds of chemical munitions in Iraq, which Santorum and Hoekstra claimed proved the existence of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), the key argument in the Bush administration's case for invading Iraq. Santorum and Hoekstra made the claim at a press conference that Fox News covered live that evening, and throughout the evening, Fox News hosts highlighted these claims as "vindicat[ing]" -- in the words of Fox host Sean Hannity -- the Bush administration's prewar WMD claims. In fact, soon after the press conference, intelligence officials confirmed that the pre-1991 shells were not the WMDs that the Bush administration cited in its argument for war. Moreover, the Iraq Survey Group's September 2004 final report (also known as the Duelfer report) had already noted that "a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions" were discovered after the invasion, as the weblog Think Progress noted.

At the press conference, Santorum and Hoekstra announced that a recently declassified intelligence-report summary showed that WMDs, specifically chemical weapons, were present in Iraq prior to the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. Santorum and Hoekstra said U.S. troops have recovered at least 500 of these chemical munitions. Santorum told reporters:

FOX News promoted these idiots even though they new their information was phony. The buffoonery with which these two members of Congress acted is unconscionable, but still Hoekstra is treated like a credible member of Congress by the press and was seen on the Sunday Talk Shows today as an expert.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (1496)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (1574)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

A man who has been totally disgraced for his past behavior, including ethics violations, as Speaker of the House now is constantly being given a platform to slime and smear any victim of his choosing freely. Nancy Pelosi is his newest target and he's been vicious in his attacks on her.

Newt, a man divorced many times over, just became a Catholic (a faith that frowns upon divorce) and got booted out of his Speaker's job because the American people hated his tactics. Yet he has the nerve to say Pelosi committed some unforgivable sin by saying the CIA lied, and that she should lose her leadership position. Being a Catholic now (I still consider myself one, but not very strict), who is he to point fingers at others when he himself has sinned so much?

He called her a liar among other smears yesterday on ABC radio, and then appeared on Good Morning America with Diane Sawyer and went one step further.

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich today flatly declared that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi should be replaced in the wake of her allegation that the CIA lied to her about harsh interrogation techniques.

“She really disqualified herself to be speaker,” Gingrich, R-Ga., told Diane Sawyer on ABC’s “Good Morning America. “I think the Democrats should get a new speaker.”

When Sawyer brought up the fact that in 2008, Republican Sen. Peter Hoekstra similarly declared that the CIA lies to Congress, why didn't Newt demand that he be repudiated also? Newt practices the kind of hypocrisy he knows all too well.

Sawyer: Hoekstra: "We cannot have an intelligence community that covers up what it has been doing and then lies to Congress." That's a Republican saying it. And they're saying, where were you then, you didn't call for him to resign?

Gingrich: Well, I think in that particular argument he's fighting with them over a report he wants about a year and a half ago, but I've had a similar standard of toughness with Republicans on other issues...

Continue reading »



"The Gang that couldn't shoot straight"

andrea-mitchell-docs1.jpg I know it probably pained them to say it, but that's what Nora and Andrea Mitchell are calling the White House and the right wing bloggers for forcing the release of Saddam's documents.

icon Download | play -WMP icon Download | play -QT

Their master plan of finding WMD's backfired on the Army of idiots. (rough transcript)

Mitchell: ...Peter Hoekstra in fact said, Quote: "Let's unleash the power of the Internet on these documents to see if there was a smoking gun on WMD's"---the intelligence experts were reluctant to release these documents..Skeptics at the time said that all this was being done by conservative bloggers and others on the Intelligence committees to try and bolster their argument that the war was in fact justified in the first place.

These specific dozen documents--they did have a blue print for making bombs and those technical documents could have been helpful to terrorists...The net affect would likely be that it would hurt the administration because it shows that they---once again---were the gang that couldn't shoot straight!---they forced the Intelligence community to do something that the experts didn't want to do and the President himself overruled John Negroponte on.

Sadly, No! has more...



Calling in The Army of Davids

This is really tragic and sad and I can't stop laughing.

Hoekstra had actually been agitating for releasing the documents for quite some time. In February, Instapundit reported:

PAJAMAS MEDIA CORRESPONDENT Andrew Marcus interviews Rep. Peter Hoekstra about all those unread Iraqi WMD documents. Hoekstra suggests parceling them out to the blogosphere. Call in the Army of Davids!.

It looks like the ole perfesser and his pals didn't realize that the Army of Davids might include a few soldiers of jihad. Ooopsie!

It's a good thing the government is launching an investigation to find the dastardly bastards who leaked that Pentagon chart that realistically assessed the conditions in Iraq the other day. That puts America at risk. "Shining a spotlight" on nuclear bombmaking plans (conveniently written in arabic)by putting them all over the internet, on the other hand, is a terrific idea. That's what the Republicans are all about — "a transparent process rather than one mired in secrecy."

You can sure see why these guys have such a reputation for being good on national security, can't you?



Attytood:

We have one question this morning for Sen. Rick Santorum, Michelle Malkin, Glenn Reynolds, Rep. Peter Hoekstra, John Hinderaker, Roger Simon, Stephen Hayes, and a self-proclaimed "army" of right-wing bloggers. Oh yeah, and President George W. Bush: Why are you helping Iran to develop a nuclear bomb?...read on



Mike's Blog Round Up

NewsHog: The Mumbai bombs and Pakistan...recently, Cernig called the Indian sub-continent the Most Dangerous Place In The World and a month ago predicted that America's next big foreign policy disaster was brewing there.

Senate Majority Project: After being implicated in two election crimes, and serving time in prison, Alan Raymond's phone-jamming company is back in business...under a different name.

War and Piece: Michigan Republican Rep. Peter Hoekstra has suggested some unauthorized leaks could have been deliberate attempts to help al-Qaeda. That kind of reckless talk sounds familiar...

Attytood: A plea to America's news directors and editors: Cancel Bush's "Fear Factor"

The Brad Blog: California election official facing 43 criminal charges...

Media in Trouble: NPR's Steve Inskeep parroted GOP talking points, Senator Leahy slapped him down.