Go Home

The Politico

7 documents found in 0.001 seconds.

Why is Sully shocked?

...that Mike Allen of The Politico is a hack?

Allen is allowing a member of the administration that broke the Geneva Conventions and commited war crimes to attack the current president and claim, without any substantiation, that the torture worked. He then allows that "top official" to proclaim things that are at the very least highly questionable. What journalistic standard is Allen following in allowing such a person to speak anonymously?

And how much lower can he sink in craving buzz and traffic?

He's been a Bush bottom feeder for a long time and it won't stop anytime soon.



Liberal Media? What Liberal Media?

The Politico is reporting that Fran Townsend, former Homeland Security Adviser, is joining her buddy Tony Snow as a contributor to CNN. PERRspectives:

Politico is reporting that President Bush's former homeland security adviser and current intelligence advisory board member Fran Townsend is joining CNN as a contributor. Joining former White House press secretary Tony Snow as the second Bush sycophant to join the network in the last two weeks, Townsend's addition is apparently designed to help make CNN the "right choice" during its election '08 coverage.

While George W. Bush may be most disliked President in modern American history, his one-time mouthpieces are very popular at CNN indeed.

Yes, they certainly are. You know, I'm not afraid of conservative voices on the air, but I'm curious where is CNN's responsibility to provide thoughtful voices on the left? Especially when they make a point of including someone only too happy to pimp White House talking points like this one, upon her departure from Homeland Security.

icon Download | play icon Download | play

Is Paul Begala to be the only voice of the left on CNN?



Bush’s 'perverse' citations

In his much-discussed speech before the VFW’s national contention this week, Bush told the veterans, “You know, the experts sometimes get it wrong. An interesting observation, one historian put it — he said, ‘Had these erstwhile experts’ — he was talking about people criticizing the efforts to help Japan realize the blessings of a free society — he said, ‘Had these erstwhile experts had their way, the very notion of inducing a democratic revolution would have died of ridicule at an early stage.’”

The historian Bush quoted is not pleased.

A historian quoted by President Bush to help argue that critics of the administration’s Iraq policy echo those who questioned the U.S. effort to bring democracy to Japan after World War II angrily distanced himself from the president’s remarks Thursday.

“They [war supporters] keep on doing this,” said MIT professor John Dower. “They keep on hitting it and hitting it and hitting it and it’s always more and more implausible, strange and in a fantasy world. They’re desperately groping for a historical analogy, and their uses of history are really perverse.”

Bush took the quote from Dower’s award-winning book, “Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II.” But the wordsmiths who tell the president what to say probably should have looked a little closer: Dower believes the White House’s analysis is “a misuse of history” and told the Politico that his views have been “misrepresented” by the president.

Did Bush's speechwriters assume no one would bother checking? Or are they really this sloppy?



Letters!

I signed on for this one.."Letters to RNC and DNC request all debate footage be put in public domain or licensed as “Creative Commons.". Here's the pdf* from L. Lessig....

The Politico picked it up and Ben Smith was correct when he said:

Along with Moulitsas and Malkin, signers include authors of the conservative Instapundit, and liberal sites the Huffington Post, MyDD, Americablog, Firedoglake, as well as the pioneering video site CrooksandLiars and the Internet and politics-oriented Personal Democracy Forum.

*fixed link

UPDATE: Barack Obama has sent out a press release supporting us. From the release:

Continue reading »



A Bad Week for the Politico

Amanda checks into the incredible number of mistakes the crackerjack team led by the ex-Washington Post man---John Harris---has accumulated in less than a week. You remember him don't you? He tried to get the wonderful Dan Froomkin fired. Anyway, their hackery is showing itself in record-breaking time. Oliver Willis posted Mike Allen's audio interview with Matt Drudge that speaks for itself. While the term "slow bleed" that the Republicans now use as an anthem originated from them, their credibility is quickly being flushed down the toilet...

Will Bunch has more: Rookie Mistakes Plague The Politico

OK, actually the headline of the piece that I'm writing about here is "Rookie Mistakes Plague Obama," and it's the latest effort from the new, right-wing narrative-boosting tag team of The Politico web site and Matt Drudge.

UPDATE: Glenn Greenwald: Drudge and the Politico -- poisonously joined at the hip

But whatever else is true, it is now inescapably clear that The Politico will be working hand-in-hand with Matt Drudge. That seems to be the very purpose of The Politico -- quoting a blogger with whom I exchanged email on this topic earlier this week: "to put the full stamp of legitimacy on the Drudgification of politics."

UPDATE #2: Media Matters lists some other reasons that the Politico needs to keep apologizing



Dan Gerstein responds to Sargent's piece.

Dan Gerstein has responded to my post below. He says there's no problem at all with the fact that The Politico published a piece by him attacking some of Joe Lieberman's high-profile foes at the same time that he was collecting money from Lieberman...

What happened here is this: Gerstein used The Politico as a platform partly to settle the old scores of -- and to advance the current agenda of -- a paying client, but without mentioning the "paying" part. Is that really what Harris and VandeHei envision for something they're hoping to establish as the preeminently credible Web-based political publication?

As Duncan says:

For years it's been news, an almost obligatory reference in any article about bloggers, that Markos got a few bucks from the Dean campaign, something he fully disclosed at the time. Then it was big news that Markos had a friend who worked for Mark Warner which, again, wasn't exactly a big secret and the mere fact of this friendship was an existential taint of some sort.

Now the hot insiders at the Politico are letting paid flacks for politicians write articles without disclosing that information. And it's us unethical bloggers who have issues. What a bunch of wankers.

Apparently it's just fine by The Politico that they gave Gerstein a platform to bash bloggers without disclosing the fact that Gerstein is paid by Lieberman now and yes---it makes a difference,. The Politico knew exactly what he was going to say and it appears to me that Gerstein was given the platform to settle old scores for Harris and VandeHei as well in my opinion. Way to go. And you wonder why people turn to blogs.



Politico Hackery?

Will The Politico offer an explanation? Doubt it.

So we have very good reason to suspect that Gerstein may well be a paid adviser to Lieberman. Incidentally, even if Gerstein is merely a current unpaid adviser to Lieberman, The Politico should have identified him as such when it published his attack on some of Lieberman's key political rivals.

Read the article and if you agree with Greg, email The Politico. I called them for comment, but was transfered to voice mail.

Update by Silent Patriot:

Anatomy of a Politico Distortion:

First Politico characterizes the Murtha/Pelosi plan with the inflammatory term "slow bleed." Then the GOP and right wing puppets pick up on it and, boom!, the Democrats' New Official Strategy is "Slow Bleed." Then FOX News (and soon after, CNN and MSNBC) reinforce the myth, always failing to mention that the plan actually protects the troops by ensuring they're properly rested and equipped before entering battle.

Two days later, Politico admits they made up the term, but that doesn't matter. Already a Google search for 'Murtha slow bleed strategy' yields 160,000 hits -- mostly all distortions of the plan, still attributing the term "slow bleed" to Murtha and Pelosi.