Charles Rangel

TOPICS

The Kucinich bill would allow states to form their own single-payer systems:

As reported earlier, House leaders have stripped the Kucinich amendment from the House health care reform bill. This amendment would help nullify legal challenges against efforts by individual states to enact their own single-payer systems.

[...] According to Tim Carpenter of Progressive Democrats of America, one avenue of appeal remains regarding these efforts:

Democratic House leaders can insert what is called a “Manager’s Amendment” into legislation, even when it is closed to any other amendments. The managers are the majority and minority members who “manage” debate for the bill on each side.

Today, tomorrow, and beyond, we need to call these “managers” and insist that the Kucinich Amendment is restored into the healthcare bill.

The “gang” that holds our future in their hands includes:

* Speaker Nancy Pelosi: Washington, DC, office (202) 225-4965; San Francisco office (415) 556-4862

* Majority Leader Steny Hoyer: Washington, DC, office (202...; Greenbelt office (301)...; Waldorf office (301)...

* Rep. Henry Waxman: Washington, DC, office (202) 225-3976; Los Angeles office (323) 651-1040

*Rep. Charles Rangel: Washington, DC, office (202) 225-4365; New York office (212) 663-3900

* Rep. George Miller: Washington, DC, office (202) 225-2095; Concord office (925) 602-1880; Richmond office (510) 262-6500; Vallejo office (707) 645-1888



This came as a shock to me and I'm still not sure what to make of it.
Jonathan Cohn: AMA Endorses House Bill.

Via Health Care for America Now: The American Medical Association just sent a letter to House Ways and Means Chairman Charles Rangel, endorsing the health reform proposal put forward by three House committees.

This is unexpected. Or, at least, I wasn't expecting it. Recent signals from the AMA suggested they were reluctant to embrace reform, in no small part because they believed a public insurance option would underpay them. But the AMA letter contains no caveats. It is a straightforward endorsement.

And that makes it a pretty big deal. No, the AMA is not as powerful, nor as representative of the medical community, as it once was. But an unqualified endorsement for the most liberal plan out there has large symbolic value, given the role AMA played in killing health care reform for most of the 20th Century...read on

Howie Klein writes:

Yesterday the dependably conservative AMA came out in favor of the House compromise on health care reform. It doesn't include single payer but the robust public option it does include seems like the best deal working families can expect from a political system as corrupted by corporate money as ours is. In a letter to Charlie Rangel, Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, the AMA's Michael Maves pledged to work with the House leadership to help build support for the bill with the public. (Presumably that would mean combatting Republican and Blue Dog efforts to diminish the 70-80% support for the public option already showing up in all polling on the subject.)

Just as shocking is that a bunch of freshman Democrats have written a letter to Nancy Pelosi against raising taxes to help pay for the bill.

Twenty-one freshman Democratic House members have signed a letter opposing their leadership's plan to raise taxes to finance a healthcare overhaul.

Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.) circulated the letter, saying that the income surtax on the wealthy would place an undue burden on small businesses, some of which pay taxes in the same way as an individual. The letter had 22 signers, all freshmen except for Rep. Paul Hodes (D-N.H.), who is in his second term.

“Especially in a recession, we need to make sure not to kill the goose that will lay the golden eggs of our recovery,” the letter said. “We are concerned that this will discourage entrepreneurial activity.”

Polis voted against the plan at the Education and Labor Committee markup Friday as a protest against the tax. But the letter itself did not threaten that its signers would vote against the bill. Instead, it asks for a different source of money to be found, and says more cost savings should be found so that less money is needed.

What the heck is this? Why is Jared Polis on board? Here's his press release attacking the funding of the House plan. Please contact him here:

Washington, DC Office 501 Cannon House O. B., Washington, DC 20515
p. 202.225.2161

f. 202.226.7840 Frisco Office West Main Professional Building, 101 West Main Street, Suite #101D, P.O. Box 1453, Frisco, CO 80443

p. 970.668.3240

f. 970.668.9830Boulder Office, 4770 Baseline Rd, #220, Boulder, CO 80303
p. 303.484.9596

f. 303.568.9007

Thornton Office, 1200 East 78th Avenue, Suite #105, Thornton, CO 80229

p.303.287.4159 f. 303.287.4385
His press contact is Lara Cottingham at lara.cottingham@mail.house.gov

Jared's also on Twitter: http://twitter.com/jaredpolis

Tell Jared Polis to stop blocking health care reform.


So says republican David Dreier on Late Edition, in his promotion of Social Security reform:

Video

Dreier: African Americans are...would be the greatest beneficiaries of this as they would be able with a shortened life span, they would be able to pass this on....

Rangel: So we die earlier we should invest....

It's nice to see how republicans are looking out for African American's shortened life span.