Uvalde Cops Didn't Save Kids Because Shooter Had An AR-15
In their own words, during and after their botched response, the officers pointed to the reason: They were unwilling to confront the rifle on the other side of the door.
So after it was all over, did you see any of them speak up about banning AR-15s? And when school officials said the only way to protect the kids was armed guards in schools. they kept quiet then, too. THEY KNEW IT WAS BULLSHIT. The only way you can stop the slaughter of children is to stop selling weapons of war to the public. Via the Texas Tribune:
Almost a year after Texas’ deadliest school shooting killed 19 children and two teachers, there is still confusion among investigators, law enforcement leaders and politicians over how nearly 400 law enforcement officers could have performed so poorly. People have blamed cowardice or poor leadership or a lack of sufficient training for why police waited more than an hour to breach the classroom and subdue an amateur 18-year-old adversary.
But in their own words, during and after their botched response, the officers pointed to another reason: They were unwilling to confront the rifle on the other side of the door.
A Texas Tribune investigation, based on police body cameras, emergency communications and interviews with investigators that have not been made public, found officers had concluded that immediately confronting the gunman would be too dangerous. Even though some officers were armed with the same rifle, they opted to wait for the arrival of a Border Patrol SWAT team, with more protective body armor, stronger shields and more tactical training — even though the unit was based more than 60 miles away.
“You knew that it was definitely an AR,” Uvalde Police Department Sgt. Donald Page said in an interview with investigators after the school shooting. “There was no way of going in. … We had no choice but to wait and try to get something that had better coverage where we could actually stand up to him.”