Pence Can Testify, As Court Rejects Trump Suit
The decision said that while Pence could claim some protections against testimony, he would have to answer questions about any potentially illegal acts committed by Trump.
Last night, Trump lost his appeal to stop Mike Pence from testifying in front of a grand jury investigating the Mighty Mango's efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The 11th-hour ruling by the D.C.'s U.S. Court of Appeals paved the way for Pence to appear before Jack Smith's grand jury as early as this week. Via the New York Times:
Prosecutors have been trying to get Mr. Pence to talk about Mr. Trump’s demands for several months — first in requests by the Justice Department for an interview and then through a grand jury subpoena issued by the special counsel Jack Smith, who inherited the inquiry into Mr. Trump’s attempts to stay in power.
Last month, in a pair of sealed rulings, Judge James E. Boasberg, the chief judge of Federal District Court in Washington, ordered Mr. Pence to appear before the grand jury, striking down two separate challenges that would have kept him from answering certain questions.
In one of those challenges, Mr. Pence sought on his own to limit his testimony by arguing that his role as the president of the Senate on Jan. 6, when Mr. Trump’s defeat was certified by Congress, meant he was protected from legal scrutiny by the executive branch — including the Justice Department. That argument was based on the “speech or debate” clause of the Constitution, which is intended to protect the separation of powers.
Judge Boasberg ruled that while Mr. Pence could claim some protections against testimony under the clause, he would have to answer questions about any potentially illegal acts committed by Mr. Trump. This month, Mr. Pence announced that he did not intend to appeal the decision.