This is disturbing. Some of the nation's most influential political minds simply don't believe in our Constitutional framework. (Neither do tw
This is disturbing. Some of the nation's most influential political minds simply don't believe in our Constitutional framework. (Neither do two of the Republican frontrunners for President, for that matter.) Glenn Greenwald explains basic Constitutional theory to delusional, literally un-American neocons.
So apparently, the American Founders risked their lives and fortunes in order to wage war against Great Britain and declare independence from the King -- all in order to vest "near dictatorial power" in the American President in all matters of foreign policy and national security. And, of course, for the [Weekly Standard's] Michael Goldfarbs of the world, "war" and "national security" -- and the "near dictatorial power" vested in the President in those areas -- now encompasses virtually every government action, since scary and dangerous Muslims are lurking everywhere, on every corner, and the entire world is one big "battlefield" in the "War on Terrorism," including U.S. soil. Until the Bill Kristols and John Yoos and other authoritarians of that strain entered the political mainstream, I never heard of prominent Americans who describe the power that they want to vest in our political leaders as "near dictatorial." Anyone with an even passing belief in American political values would consider the word "dictatorial" -- at least rhetorically, if not substantively -- to define that which we avoid at all costs, not something which we seek, embrace and celebrate. If there is any political principle that was previously common to Americans regardless of partisan orientation, it was that belief. Read more...
How would Goldfarb and Kristol feel about "near dictatorial power" in the hands of, oh, I don't know, Hillary Clinton?