Chris Matthews and Ann Coulter Sitting in a Tree...
By Nicole Belle Thursday Jul 05, 2007 2:45pm
My buddy, Media Bloodhound, has found some ties between Tweety and Coultergeist that may explain his willingness to give her uninterrupted and unchallenged airtime to spew her own particular form of bile.
Login or Register to post comments.
*)
8)
I thought it was cause she's a rethuglican horn-dog's dream woman/swamp monster kind of thing. Either that or he was totally hard up for any news to report that wouldn't make his party look like complete assholes.
That picture! Look close! Looook at it.
They're separated at birth. They were they were...it explains it ALL!!!
If they mated...........
Arrghh.
Mr Moo @ 5:
Physical impossibility. Although, I am having doubts about Tweety's manhood.
Same publisher. So what?
Al Franken has the same publisher as Edward Klein of the slimy book, "The Truth About Hillary," and Franken still held Klein accountable:
http://mediamatters.org/items/200506240007
She must have a walk-in closet full of black dresses. If not, she sure got her money's worth out of that one. Plus, looking at that photo, don’t you get the feeling that observed from an exact side-angle she would just disappear?
Dear God, somebody call Bill Frist, that women needs a feeding tube.
Tweety, like Coultergeist, will do almost anything for ratings. His obsession with the Clenis and manly-man Rethuglicans is legendary, exposing his own "issues." The conflict of interest vis-a-vis Coultergeist is unsurprising, but pathetic nonetheless. This is what progressives have to overcome in the months and years ahead in order to prevail.
I thought Ann was the tree.
Even dogs refuse to piddle on her.
Strawberry @ 9:
Someone call Mitt Romney. That woman needs to be strapped to the roof of a car.
Liberal AND Proud @ 12:
She'd enjoy that.
These two…in a hotel room… naked in the hot tub…giving each other peroxide treatments.
Mr Moo @ 5:
Wont happen. Coulter is incapable of having children.
Chris Matthews is the sad example of what so-called American "journalism" has come to. He's just another hack, only a little more platable than Glenn Beck, Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity.
Which one would be the woman?
He should be fired for non-disclosure.
Unless MSNBC supports this sort of thing-which would, conceivably, put them on the same level with Fox 'News'-if they weren't already really there, that is.
miss_kitty @ 18:
He should be fired for non-intelligence.
She should be banned from the airwaves because children could be watching. Or at least have a warning posted before she appears on camera.
Gort @ 14:
Why am I sure she would float?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_by_drowning
What more can anyone possibly say about this kind of nonsense?
We are simply living through an extended silly season,a prolonged trip down the rabbit hole.
I have tuned out everything on MSNBC except Countdown. I see John Ridley is trying to be the morals equevilant on MSNBC that Bill Orally is on Faux. What's up with this shit. People do have "private lives" and and Ridley and Orally are not qualified to judge their actions. I want to see their Doctor Degrees in psycology. They're both full of shit.
Given this conflict of interest, Chris Matthews is, as a GE employee, deeply in violation of GE's Code of Conduct - the "Spirit and Letter". He can be fired for the first offense. I might suggest a campaign to contact the GE Corporate Ombudsman with complaints, providing links to this C&L thread and to the article on Media Bloodhound. I am told that they take this kind of ethical breach very seriously.
Contact Info:
GE Corporate Ombudsperson at 800-227-5003
or
ombudsperson@corporate.ge.com
The choir is outraged. Now what?
Liberal AND Proud @ 12:
Now THAT'S funny.
I'm not sure what the big deal is here. So the same company will publish his book and hers. That's not much more of a conflict of interest than any television interviewer is always in. Without guests, the interviewer has no show. Attack your guests or make them look foolish and they won't come back. Since, at best, all of these shows, including Olbermann's, are just infotainment, then the focus is (and should be) ratings. Ann Coulter generates ratings. Even those who hate her (and there are many) will watch her just to be outraged.
Now if you can prove that Mathews actually got paid money to shill for her, then that story would generate enough ratings for Matthews' competitors to run with it. Anything less is just business as usual.
Tweety is just a weird homosexual (please note how many times he describes Coulter as "fabulous") touting a transvestite. What else is new?
Why is ann coulter so damn creepy?
Here is the Ann Coulter interview on Chris Matthews' Hardball. Feel free to dissect it, dice it, critique it and otherwise recoil in horror at the shameless nature of it all.
Part 1:
http://beta.redlasso.com/Community/ClipPlayer.aspx?i=c2de81c5-48ac-4591-...
Part 2:
http://beta.redlasso.com/Community/ClipPlayer.aspx?i=f3b083e9-b185-4336-...
Part 3:
http://beta.redlasso.com/Community/ClipPlayer.aspx?i=dc7a7444-f4b1-46b2-...
I think Tweety and the C**t are one and the same. They were not seperated at birth, it's just the power of the undead to shapeshift...Sometime looks like a Man and sometimes looke like whatever Chris Matthews is.
Now that's an explanation I can believe!
Bob Roberts @ 26:
I don't watch Matthews or Coulter, I don't tune into his show and if she is on a show I would surely turn it off...even if it's Real Time with Bill Maher...I will not support anyone who puts that trash on the air. and to the people who do watch her, weather your watch because you like her or because she gets your dander up the shame on you, you should know better...and really when there are so many things in America to piss us off, do we really need to watch Coulter just to be outraged?
medlakeguy @ 28:
We don't have enough bandwidth to cover that topic! LOL!
The smelly whore apparently is blowing Matthews now too, just like Faux Noise Fat-Ass Fattity was.
Well if they wanted attention, they sure got it. Look how long we have been talking about this. I'm thinking their publisher is loving this. I have a friend who writes op-eds for a newspaper. She says if she writes a piece and the editor doesn't hear anything about it, that's not good. If she writes a piece that gets a whole bunch of people ticked off and they raise hell about it, her editor loves it.
Just sayin'
dennis @ 25:
I want a t-shirt with that!!!!! Her bulimic carcass with large caption...
Calling Bill Frist!!!... Congress needs to act NOW... get Bush up in his jammies!!!
Tube Me NOW!!!!
This is too funny!!!!!!!
Chris definately has some 'splaining to do. The same launch date of his book and her book from the same publisher and the way the
interviewlovefest went raises the issue of quid pro quo.As far as
ACDC goes, she is what you get when a kid is raised without love.Some nice investigation work! I thought that Matthews mentioned "books" and "she's a great writer" just a little too much for comfort. May I suggest that we buy neither of them.
txlvn @ 35:
pissed off patricia @ 34:
I'm not sure this is the type of attention they want. Controversy that sells papers/increases ratings is one thing - conflict of interest is another.
Thankfully I clicked the link.
No Matthews fanman here but the image....
the image, the horror of screwing that thing.....
I would need a tent peg in my ear.
Thank goodness its only corruption of the monetary kind.
Boy, I botched that post! LOL!
We can do both. They can plug a feeding tube into her, strap her to the roof of a car and driver her around at Republican fundraisers!
Liberal and Proud..... I'd pay a dollar to see that.... :-)
fiver @ 39:
It's official; I'm an idiot. Why would NBC (owned by an energy company/defense contractor) worry about this comparatively minor conflict of interest in it's news coverage?
They're only relevant when you pay attention to anything they say. Coulter knows she's got a limited shelf life, gotta keep making noise when no one is listening. P.T. Barnum would be proud of her.
Paul @ 29:
Thanks Paul, but to be honest I'm better of cutting grass in my garden-it's already 5:00 pm here on Eastern side- than waste my time on this (crap) pointless conversation...
Chris Mathews is a 4 year old in a puffy, bloated adult body. He always reminds me of that kid in my nursery school class who always interrupted the other kids and shouted them down. He was a sneaky little bastard, too.
They are all mediawhores. It's the only way Buscho could accomplish its coup.
Huh...
I didn't realize Matthews liked guys. I thought all those conservative types went against that sort of thing.
txlvn @ 42:
Isn't that from RoboCop?
ysbaddaden @ 49:
I think Robocop was: "I'll buy that for a dollar."
Random House sure isn't very fussy about their clients anymore. Poor Bennet Cerf must be spinning in his grave.
ann, you ignorant slut
fiver @ 50:
"i'd buy that for a dollar" -- classic robocop line
"iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii like it!" -- another classic
best thing is to turn the crap off, because Mathews IS a " media Whore", pimping books for the racist guy Coulter, ignoring his racism and lies. for what, to be a good little corporate lapdog. Just like Russert showing up on EVERY cable show including FOX, pimping his little folksy Daddy books , when they should be going to QVC, not using a " news" program to line their pockets . These cable shows are nothing more then SHAMS .
Coulter and Malkin say what the GOP really thinks. Hosts like Billo and Matthews use these people as regular guest to for the same reason - to same what they can't without damaging their creditability and claim to objectivity. Olbermann does the same thing except his regular guest include Millbank, Fineman, and Turly. The difference is one side offers insight and a glimse of untold truths and the other side provides hate, crap, and lies. The funny part is Malkin and Coulter dumb themselve down to do their job while the other side does not in order to serve their purpose.
The simple reality is this there are no boundaries for people like Coulter, but there are for people like Al Sharpton and Cindy Shehan. Is Coulter's bit the floor or the ceiling for politcal discourse today? The issue isn't merely what she says, it's what can't she say but does with immunity from the media backing her because she "sells books."
Coulter isn't the problem - she's the symptom of corporate media corruption. Her career would be over if today's corporate media believed that Money doesn't trump morality and civility. It's about ratings and her political Howard Stern routine serves their agenda, not ours.
Better than if she made it with bill maher http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/2873/billcoulterph7.jpg
commenter #33, you've got it backwards, tweety's the one turning (m)Ann's crank
I think a sympathy card is in order--both for the demise of his spine and his brain.
It's not just Ann Coulter, it's any ratings-booster he can get in there at all. Tweety's ratings must be sucking. Yesterday he had Bruce Willis of all people on his show. I like Bruce and all, but the guy sounds like he knows politics about as well as say... any fine above-average chimpanzee. I mean, it was just ridiculous. Willis couldn't even articulate much more than, "People should care about the troops..." I despise Matthews. He's an incredulous, sexist attention hog.
E in MD @ 48:
That's what they SAY...but the gig i had working as a bouncer at a gay bar showed me that, usually the more homophobic they act, the greater the likelihood that they are in deep denial about themselves.
Wow, it's only the same old business as usual. I thought he might be visiting her nasty place or her vagina. Now that would be sick...
Hype-Jersey @ 59:
Well at least he's not Dumbya, the not-so-fine below-average chimpanzee. Yeah, I know, an insult to below-average chimpanzees everywhere, beeb there done that, got the t-shirt...
Sorry, "..been there, done that,..."
So...whose going to be the bottom? My money is on tweety...JD
Corruption is the American way.
Matthews is a gay as my Uncle/Aunt Bob/Bobbie. Except Bob/Bobbie isn't as freaky. He doesn't drool over how all those studly, on the back end of middle age Republican candidates are real men. How much their smell makes him go all atwitter and weak kneed. Take a big dreamland whiff there Chrissy Boy and...well. a girl can dream can't she?
I think he just does it out of respect, ( or envy ) matthews: " hmmm, I wish I could fool some republicans like "Ann" does....hmmmm
Bob Roberts @ 26:
Matthews got a book deal from the SAME publisher as Coulter's. The form of payment isn't always in cash. This stinks to high heaven, and anyone would be naive NOT to think that Matthews received some form of "payola" for his promotions of Coulter.
We can only hope that GE will fire Matthews for a clear non-disclosure of a conflict, at the very least, and an ethical violation (choosing guests that enrich the host) at worst.
Chris Matthews has lots of guests on his show. Of course, some of them will have the same publisher he does.
If Matthews had a different publisher, then one could say, "Aha!, he had Mr. Smith on his show because they have the same publisher."
No meaningful conflict-of-interest was proven.
She's a CRYSTAL METH addcit. The other is a messy DRUNK.
They're a match made in hell!
Lovely.
Oh when will ole' Skelleta just shrivel up and blow away?!
Random with all its imprints is the largest publisher in North America. So Matthews and Coulter share a publisher
Now - IF there are contractual agreements requiring Matthews or paying Matthews to promote Coulter's dreck, THAT would be huge. It would well result in the early retirement of Matthews and a couple of Random execs.
Chances are - if such a contract exists, it is oral. Written would be way too dangerous.
Coulter is a pathetic excuse for a human being, but her ability to be on the NYT Bst Seller list is testimony to the political sophistication of a large number of Americans to say nothing of their pathetic sense of what is right and what is wrong.
Coulter should be cleaning toilets at Random, not selling books for them.
Matthews belongs in the midnight slot of a 5000 watt AM station.
Gort @ 14:
I was about to say..Get a Room!
Okay you guys won me over. I use to be on C&L defending Matthews left and right. Now I'm convinced that his integrity is suspect at best. Media bloodhound really did their homework.
Has anyone else noticed that Coulter has pretty much dropped off the radar screen since Mrs. Edwards cut her off at the knees? In the past her shitty remarks have generally gained her television appearances a shelf life of around six weeks before she slinks back into the confines of her sub-human existance to total up the tally of her latest fact absent fiasco.
I think the right power has figured out what a liability this non-human, piece of shit is and decided to reel her in.
First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes...His eyes!! What have you done to his eyes!!
Sometimes I'm happy to be humble little me. Ya know what I mean?
Ewwwe.....
So let me get this straight - if there is anything happening - would that make Mathews a person who Coultergiest accused John Edwards of a few months back........
I'm getting confused now....
Liberal AND Proud @ 6:
What do you mean if? These two apparently are shaggin each other now. Why else would Matthews be at her beck an call; I tell ya they're doing the wango tango....a brilliant writer? lol...this is too funny, and kinda sick at the same time.
It is a unwritten law that if you are a Republican you must buy 5 copies of Ann Coulter book. and it should be against the law for Coulter are Tweety to use the intellect
once again...follow the money....
Whores, both of them.
The bloodhound article is fascinating in its exploration of the Random House connection between Coulter and Matthews. What's even more fascinating is that the Matthew's interview keeps referencing the book. The bloodhound article gives us the kind of investigative journalism that the mainstream media does not do because it is so involved in marketing, selling, cross-marketing, and profiteering itself. By the way, my wife and I decided to turn off Matthews because of his uneven and strange behavior. When you watch him you know there are hidden agendas operating but it is never quite clear what they are. Why is he so fawning one minute for one guest and ready to pounce on someone the next. Giving Ann Coulter an hour on his show and throwing soft balls at her is really bizarre behavior for a guy who promotes himself as asking the tough questions and calls his show 'Hardball'. Calling Coulter a genius because she launches outrageous ad hominem attacks against others is just a bizarre attitude to take. This article helps explain this kind of erratic behavior. For Matthews it's just about the buck and self-promotion (as I believe it is for Coulter as well). Well if that is what he is after it can best be done out of sight in the bathroom using one hand. We don't need to watch it. Great piece.
even though i saw this yesterday when it was first posted, again i'm nauseated. ugh, just the thought. there goes my appetite. tweety on the shrew...er, the shrew on tweety- thanks for the insinuation...i just blew coffee out of my nose. talk about pain- youch.
Me and Ann Coulter have sex everyday.
I hope this comes back to haunt Tweety and his precious ratings and book sales. With what LITTLE faith I have left in the main stream media, I believe that there still should be a PRICE for the way he has belittled his "base."
ME. I'm his base.
This time I refused to watch his show that day and I sent him an e-mail BEFORE the show explaining why.
I STILL feel used and abused, and I am not a happy cowboy.
OSWALD @ 85:
Please tell me your using contraceptives.
Login or Register to post comments.