Wheres Hillary ?

It looks like Hillary took her Tiara....ooops...
( Poor Joe would much rather have that Prada Gown that Anderson is wearing....)

The royal fkups.

what about Sen. Lindsay Graham (creeeeak) as a lady-in-waiting?....not that there's anything wrong with that

CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDER BUSTED FOR SOLICITING SEX FROM A PARENT!

Bet y'all $100 he's a Republican.

ferrofluid @ 2:

Wheres Hillary ?

That's an entirely different tableau with Barack Obama as Sydney Carton and Hillary Clinton as Madame DeFarge. BTW, agree with Dennis that cheap shots against gays spoil the impact.

Let them eat Passion Fruit Mousse

Karen @ 13:

Dennis @ 7:

whats up with the cheap queer shot at Anderson? so who cares who the dude sleeps with it, hate that crap

Technically, it would be the transgendered aspect of the picture that draws the attention. Not only does the juxtaposition of genders on one person remain a staple of comedy in our culture, but otherwise progressive blogs sometimes take jabs at political opponents by noting that his/her mannerisms or appearance do not conform to what society expects of his/her birth sex. It bothers me too, though I'm often told to lighten up when I mention it.

Never thought I'd agree with Dennis. I don't get it? Is Cooper Anderson a shill for McCain?

karl rove ought to switch sides, steal perino from that lymie twit and grow himself a grover cleveland mustache.

i mean, c'mon, how long can one defend the indefensible?

Hog's head cheese comes to mind. You should get this printed on a t-shirt at CafePress or something.

--Hipolitical
http://www.hipolitical.com

Can we have some Freedom Fries with this?

IF You could put all You believed in ......and put it in ONE SPACE. How large....or How small would that space be?

Leslie [Bitter Elitist Hussein] @ 16:

Karen @ 13:

Dennis @ 7:

whats up with the cheap queer shot at Anderson? so who cares who the dude sleeps with it, hate that crap

Technically, it would be the transgendered aspect of the picture that draws the attention. Not only does the juxtaposition of genders on one person remain a staple of comedy in our culture, but otherwise progressive blogs sometimes take jabs at political opponents by noting that his/her mannerisms or appearance do not conform to what society expects of his/her birth sex. It bothers me too, though I'm often told to lighten up when I mention it.

Never thought I'd agree with Dennis. I don't get it? Is Cooper Anderson a shill for McCain?

The Corporate Media has shilled for the Republican party (and its own short term economic interests) ever since the elimination of of the Fairness Doctrine and Bill Clinton's telecommunications act. Except for a very few notable exceptions, talking heads do what their Corporate paymasters tell them to do, Cooper is no exception.

Just take a look at how the Corporate Media is covering the incomes of the candidates, CNN is giving McCain a free pass attempting to paint him as one of us by excluding his wife's income:

CNN chart purporting to compare candidates' "wealth" omitted Cindy McCain, who is reportedly worth $100 million
http://mediamatters.org/items/200804180013?f=h_top

Snowball @ 26:

Leslie [Bitter Elitist Hussein] @ 16:

Karen @ 13:

Dennis @ 7:

Technically, it would be the transgendered aspect of the picture that draws the attention. Not only does the juxtaposition of genders on one person remain a staple of comedy in our culture, but otherwise progressive blogs sometimes take jabs at political opponents by noting that his/her mannerisms or appearance do not conform to what society expects of his/her birth sex. It bothers me too, though I'm often told to lighten up when I mention it.

Never thought I'd agree with Dennis. I don't get it? Is Cooper Anderson a shill for McCain?

The Corporate Media has shilled for the Republican party (and its own short term economic interests) ever since the elimination of of the Fairness Doctrine and Bill Clinton's telecommunications act. Except for a very few notable exceptions, talking heads do what their Corporate paymasters tell them to do, Cooper is no exception.

Just take a look at how the Corporate Media is covering the incomes of the candidates, CNN is giving McCain a free pass attempting to paint him as one of us by excluding his wife's income:

CNN chart purporting to compare candidates' "wealth" omitted Cindy McCain, who is reportedly worth $100 million
http://mediamatters.org/items/200804180013?f=h_top

Well, as Glenn Greenwald would say, that's been the ongoing corporate media storyline now for over a decade.

Democrats = anti-American effete traitors
Republicans = strong, manly-men you can drink beer with

Dennis Someone is giving You time. What a world.

Ron @ 27:

bullfrog @ 23:

Ron @ 21:

bullfrog @ 18:
You want him to hide his baby fat, too?

no, i want him to assume an unusually keen place in american history.

I don' know how they would make a statue of someone dropping through a trap door with a noose around his neck but that's how I would like to remember him.

if he helped bring 'em all down you'd be singing a different tune.

Where's paris hilton and prez hilton.

tHezombieHusseinGaMeOfLiFe @ 34:

Where's paris hilton and prez hilton.

Under and above. depends which way the camera angles.

it would appear as though the rothschild house of cards is rigged for controlled demolition.

and no, i'm not talking about larry rothschild and his stellar staff of chicago cubs pitchers. those cats are going to be just fine.

anyone want to do the honors and pump the fusebox?

i nominate a 9/11 firefighter.

if there are any left who haven't died of asbestos asphyxiation, that is.

PWNED BY A PEASANT YOU OLD BUZZARD.

?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

for counselor hunter s.

bullfrog @ 32:

Ron @ 27:

bullfrog @ 23:

Ron @ 21:

no, i want him to assume an unusually keen place in american history.

I don' know how they would make a statue of someone dropping through a trap door with a noose around his neck but that's how I would like to remember him.

if he helped bring 'em all down you'd be singing a different tune.

Ehhh, maybe.

the wives of mcAssHat should be off limits, if only because you're supposed to be somewhat decent. you should stop imitating oLIElly and his Mrs. Obama lynching party.

David Hawes @ 41:

Hmmmm RON! Halp Me.Is there a thread here OR have I cum late to the dance?

You're here and in plenty of time though I was getting the yawns.

Proud2bHumble Hus(in)sein @ 43:

David Hawes @ 24:

IF You could put all You believed in ......and put it in ONE SPACE. How large....or How small would that space be?

How much time do you have?

I got til the rest of My Life.

David Hawes @ 24:

IF You could put all You believed in ......and put it in ONE SPACE. How large....or How small would that space be?

My brain.

Cool . OK 1-800- get-bush The phone lines are open. You got yer ol' pal Uncledave here . OK caller go ahead.

Great line-up of political news over on Reddit tonight. http://reddit.com/r/politics/

Too many good stories to cover on just one blog.

2's Gone ..OK next caller Uncle Dave here 1-880-get-bush

Corporations have no loyalty to the people of the Earth or the Earth at large. Their only loyalty lies with themselves and their shareholders. This system isn't working any longer.

David Hawes @ 55:

we expanded our numbers for the west coast OK callers Chime in UncleDave is HERE!

Damn, busy again.

Oro and leslie hate children OK Next caller

David Hawes @ 60:

Oro and leslie hate children OK Next caller

What do you mean? I don't want the kids to go to the guillotine.

Leslie [Bitter Elitist Hussein] @ 62:

David Hawes @ 60:

Oro and leslie hate children OK Next caller

What do you mean? I don't want the kids to go to the guillotine.

OK Leslie i AM WRONG Go ahead You're on with UncleDave

Oh yeah, you are banned from using analogies until you know what they are. Draw a venn diagram to help you.

What are you doing David?

just havin some fun. Ok Never mind

McCain is a dirtbag man. Don't let anyone get away with publicly endorsing this a-hole.

You have already shown us how stupid you are.

This was a torture program... and it goes right to the President's desk.

The only doubt is simply whether anybody cares enough to do something about it.

ferro doubts eberyone Someone care to differ?

OKAY jtm LANDS A RIGHT CROSS

David Hawes @ 76:

ferro doubts eberyone Someone care to differ?

doubt is a cruel word, cynical and abject pity for the worlds soul.

Orangutan. @ 81:

"But if they would do this, if they would stoop this low, to steal our White House, what else would they do? What else are they capable of, what else are they capable of? I want to know." - Michael Moore

Anything.

And now 'ANYTHING' is injected into this before staid discussion.

Iraq war memorial is too small for all the current and future names...

Its going to be modular and expandable to fit in with McInsanes hundred year war vision,

"think outside the box and think Lego (tm)" said a flushed walleted spokesperson for the sculpture company.

According to ABMC spokesperson Charles Masterson, ground was first broken for the memorial on the National Mall in May 2003, shortly after President Bush declared the end of major combat operations in Iraq. Since the completion of the preliminary monument, however, nearly two dozen extensions have been added to the original structure to properly commemorate subsequent casualties in the conflict.

David Hawes @ 89:

Leslie-Tell the millions listening -Did that right cross pass his dreams or did You floow with an upercut?

JTM wasn't worth the expense of energy.

Good night. Sorry I wasn't more help. I was trying to figure out why the site monitor was taking so much of what I had to say under consideration. Sometimes I have to wonder about this place.

I was a dirty hippie at one time. I was damned by persons..... But,it's funny. When I played in the band(s) the same people who called Me names allof a sudden called Me better words. Hmmmmm.

Sorry to bore ya bud. Just wanna say "hey Ron'.

Operation Mockingbird is really in effect even today!! So says the New York Times. The Pentagon is putting its own people on the news shows and skewing the reporting.

Ron @ 98:

David Hawes @ 96:

Sorry to bore ya bud. Just wanna say "hey Ron'.

It's not you at all. Check my comment at 92. I don't know how badly we are going to be censored anymore.

Hmmm I was allowed my mind game,but nobody wanted to play. way too serious,but I understand. I hoped bein a saturday folks would play along.

y'all know dave rockefeller IS monty burns, right?

Rice is trying to dump Iraq on the other
Arab countries.

ferrofluid @ 88:

Iraq war memorial is too small for all the current and future names...

Its going to be modular and expandable to fit in with McInsanes hundred year war vision,

"think outside the box and think Lego (tm)" said a flushed walleted spokesperson for the sculpture company.

According to ABMC spokesperson Charles Masterson, ground was first broken for the memorial on the National Mall in May 2003, shortly after President Bush declared the end of major combat operations in Iraq. Since the completion of the preliminary monument, however, nearly two dozen extensions have been added to the original structure to properly commemorate subsequent casualties in the conflict.

This is beyond crazy!

Ron @ 103:

David Hawes @ 100:

Ron @ 98:

David Hawes @ 96:
It's not you at all. Check my comment at 92. I don't know how badly we are going to be censored anymore.

Hmmm I was allowed my mind game,but nobody wanted to play. way too serious,but I understand. I hoped bein a saturday folks would play along.

Monitoring is one thimg, censoring is far more serious. We get that from the administration.

I agree. somehow I guess the umps like my strike zone.

Why Anderson Cooper?
What has he done to deserve to be in the picture?

After dumping American jobs based on defective vehicles, GM would rather sell fuel-efficient cars in
China.

nirak @ 110:

Why Anderson Cooper?
What has he done to deserve to be in the picture?

Perhaps Zaius thinks he looks good in a bustle? Now that king on the other hand wouldn't be serving me anything flame broiled, burgers or ribs.

Ron @ 97:

David Hawes @ 96:

Sorry to bore ya bud. Just wanna say "hey Ron'.

It's not you at all. Check my comment at 92. I don't know how badly we are going to be censored anymore.

What are you talking about? What was censored?

Tell us,Ron.

David Hawes @ 118:

Tell us,Ron.

If I say what the derogatory remarks were, they will be deleted and I would almost as guilty as the person that first brought them up.

Orangutan. @ 56:

Corporations have no loyalty to the people of the Earth or the Earth at large. Their only loyalty lies with themselves and their shareholders. This system isn't working any longer.

"[Corporations] have no soul to save, and they have no body to incarcerate." -Baron Thurlow

A corporation IS NOT A 'PERSON', goddammit! A corporation serves the same purpose as a bank robber's ski mask: something to hide behind while you do horrible immoral shit, all in the quest for a giant pile of cash to roll around in naked. Created of, by, and for, the rich white men. After all, it's not really stealing if you wear a suit and tie when you do it.

Speaking of which...
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/20/america/20generals.php
:o

chris @ 123:

Orangutan. @ 56:

Corporations have no loyalty to the people of the Earth or the Earth at large. Their only loyalty lies with themselves and their shareholders. This system isn't working any longer.

"[Corporations] have no soul to save, and they have no body to incarcerate." -Baron Thurlow

A corporation IS NOT A 'PERSON', goddammit! A corporation serves the same purpose as a bank robber's ski mask: something to hide behind while you do horrible immoral shit, all in the quest for a giant pile of cash to roll around in naked. Created of, by, and for, the rich white men. After all, it's not really stealing if you wear a suit and tie when you do it.

Speaking of which...
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/20/america/20generals.php
:o

Huh? This can't be our chris the troll.

[It's not. It's a different one-Sitemonitor]

War Inc

raw story article

John Cusack was on HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher and spoke about his upcoming film, War. Inc., which according to Cusack focuses on the military-industrial complex.

billy simpson @ 97-

I'm a Michigander who voted for "uncommitted" in January, and if I could have, I'd have voted for Edwards. If we held another primary tomorrow, I'd probably vote for Obama.

But it's Obama's supporters in our Congress who won't sign on to a new primary. They see something that you don't: without Detroit- or, more realistically, without the support of the scandal-ridden Mayor of Detroit, Kwame Kilpatrick, who controls the political machine there, Obama would stand a good chance at suffering a defeat here. Possibly an ugly defeat. He might squeak out Wayne County, but Oakland and Macomb Counties (almost certainly the latter) would most probably go to Clinton. Obama might take Livingston County (Ann Arbor) and the Lansing area, Kent County(Grand Rapids) would be a toss up, as I think would Kalamazoo County, but the backwards-ass rural north of the state would definitely go to Clinton.

So don't blame her for playing it smart and keeping her name on the ballot earlier, and don't blame her for our lack of a real primary.

But you can blame the GOP- both the former Governor, John Fucking Engler and the current asshat in the White House- for laying the foundations for our economic plight and then making sure it doesn't get fixed. That's what forced us to move our primary up: we wanted our problems addressed, and we wanted to have a wide array of candidates to address those problems, not the two candidates that we usually get by the time our primay has rolled around in the past.

chris @ 123:

Orangutan. @ 56:

Corporations have no loyalty to the people of the Earth or the Earth at large. Their only loyalty lies with themselves and their shareholders. This system isn't working any longer.

"[Corporations] have no soul to save, and they have no body to incarcerate." -Baron Thurlow

A corporation IS NOT A 'PERSON', goddammit! A corporation serves the same purpose as a bank robber's ski mask: something to hide behind while you do horrible immoral shit, all in the quest for a giant pile of cash to roll around in naked. Created of, by, and for, the rich white men. After all, it's not really stealing if you wear a suit and tie when you do it.

Speaking of which...
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/20/america/20generals.php
:o

Chris, Change your name to ChrisNotTheEvilRightWingTroll or something so we can keep track.

Andy K Jong Il @ 129:

billy simpson @ 97-

I'm a Michigander who voted for "uncommitted" in January, and if I could have, I'd have voted for Edwards. If we held another primary tomorrow, I'd probably vote for Obama.

But it's Obama's supporters in our Congress who won't sign on to a new primary. They see something that you don't: without Detroit- or, more realistically, without the support of the scandal-ridden Mayor of Detroit, Kwame Kilpatrick, who controls the political machine there, Obama would stand a good chance at suffering a defeat here. Possibly an ugly defeat. He might squeak out Wayne County, but Oakland and Macomb Counties (almost certainly the latter) would most probably go to Clinton. Obama might take Livingston County (Ann Arbor) and the Lansing area, Kent County(Grand Rapids) would be a toss up, as I think would Kalamazoo County, but the backwards-ass rural north of the state would definitely go to Clinton.

So don't blame her for playing it smart and keeping her name on the ballot earlier, and don't blame her for our lack of a real primary.

But you can blame the GOP- both the former Governor, John Fucking Engler and the current asshat in the White House- for laying the foundations for our economic plight and then making sure it doesn't get fixed. That's what forced us to move our primary up: we wanted our problems addressed, and we wanted to have a wide array of candidates to address those problems, not the two candidates that we usually get by the time our primay has rolled around in the past.

If i am not mistaken if Michigan had another primary all the Republicans could vote as well and since they have a presumptive nominie they could vote for the Democratic Candidate Least Likely To Succeed.

Am i right?

chris @ 123:

Orangutan. @ 56:

Corporations have no loyalty to the people of the Earth or the Earth at large. Their only loyalty lies with themselves and their shareholders. This system isn't working any longer.

"[Corporations] have no soul to save, and they have no body to incarcerate." -Baron Thurlow

A corporation IS NOT A 'PERSON', goddammit! A corporation serves the same purpose as a bank robber's ski mask: something to hide behind while you do horrible immoral shit, all in the quest for a giant pile of cash to roll around in naked. Created of, by, and for, the rich white men. After all, it's not really stealing if you wear a suit and tie when you do it.

Speaking of which...
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/20/america/20generals.php
:o

chris- did you go back into the archives about three years and dig up my Baron Thurlow quote? Damn! It's good to see someone else who knows it!

C'mon, now...Where's the Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad link?

Andy K Jong Il @ 137:

chris @ 123:

Orangutan. @ 56:

Corporations have no loyalty to the people of the Earth or the Earth at large. Their only loyalty lies with themselves and their shareholders. This system isn't working any longer.

"[Corporations] have no soul to save, and they have no body to incarcerate." -Baron Thurlow

A corporation IS NOT A 'PERSON', goddammit! A corporation serves the same purpose as a bank robber's ski mask: something to hide behind while you do horrible immoral shit, all in the quest for a giant pile of cash to roll around in naked. Created of, by, and for, the rich white men. After all, it's not really stealing if you wear a suit and tie when you do it.

Speaking of which...
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/20/america/20generals.php
:o

chris- did you go back into the archives about three years and dig up my Baron Thurlow quote? Damn! It's good to see someone else who knows it!

C'mon, now...Where's the Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad link?

I worked at the Salinas SP in 74.

Cockles of my cold black heart still warm from last nite - thank you's my friends ;-}

Peter G @ 140:

xoites defends Constitution @ 138:

It would be good, i think, to have all the Primaries on the same day. It would make the whole process a lot less like a chess game and a lot more like Democracy.

Amen to that. And while they're at it get rid of the ridiculously undemocratic superdelegates.

Yes! McGovern got nominated and lost so they decided to take democracy out of the process. What a great idea!

xoites defends Constitution @ 134:

Andy K Jong Il @ 129:

billy simpson @ 97-

I'm a Michigander who voted for "uncommitted" in January, and if I could have, I'd have voted for Edwards. If we held another primary tomorrow, I'd probably vote for Obama.

But it's Obama's supporters in our Congress who won't sign on to a new primary. They see something that you don't: without Detroit- or, more realistically, without the support of the scandal-ridden Mayor of Detroit, Kwame Kilpatrick, who controls the political machine there, Obama would stand a good chance at suffering a defeat here. Possibly an ugly defeat. He might squeak out Wayne County, but Oakland and Macomb Counties (almost certainly the latter) would most probably go to Clinton. Obama might take Livingston County (Ann Arbor) and the Lansing area, Kent County(Grand Rapids) would be a toss up, as I think would Kalamazoo County, but the backwards-ass rural north of the state would definitely go to Clinton.

So don't blame her for playing it smart and keeping her name on the ballot earlier, and don't blame her for our lack of a real primary.

But you can blame the GOP- both the former Governor, John Fucking Engler and the current asshat in the White House- for laying the foundations for our economic plight and then making sure it doesn't get fixed. That's what forced us to move our primary up: we wanted our problems addressed, and we wanted to have a wide array of candidates to address those problems, not the two candidates that we usually get by the time our primay has rolled around in the past.

If i am not mistaken if Michigan had another primary all the Republicans could vote as well and since they have a presumptive nominie they could vote for the Democratic Candidate Least Likely To Succeed.

Am i right?

Nope. It would have been Democrats only. On the ballots, that is- open to all voters, funded privately. You don't have to register one way or the other to vote in our primaries. You had to in '88, iirc, but that law was shot down.

And if your point is that Republicans would show up and vote for Clinton, I could make the argument that they'd vote for Obama, thinking him the beatable candidate in November.

Andy K Jong Il @ 143:

xoites defends Constitution @ 134:

Andy K Jong Il @ 129:

billy simpson @ 97-

I'm a Michigander who voted for "uncommitted" in January, and if I could have, I'd have voted for Edwards. If we held another primary tomorrow, I'd probably vote for Obama.

But it's Obama's supporters in our Congress who won't sign on to a new primary. They see something that you don't: without Detroit- or, more realistically, without the support of the scandal-ridden Mayor of Detroit, Kwame Kilpatrick, who controls the political machine there, Obama would stand a good chance at suffering a defeat here. Possibly an ugly defeat. He might squeak out Wayne County, but Oakland and Macomb Counties (almost certainly the latter) would most probably go to Clinton. Obama might take Livingston County (Ann Arbor) and the Lansing area, Kent County(Grand Rapids) would be a toss up, as I think would Kalamazoo County, but the backwards-ass rural north of the state would definitely go to Clinton.

So don't blame her for playing it smart and keeping her name on the ballot earlier, and don't blame her for our lack of a real primary.

But you can blame the GOP- both the former Governor, John Fucking Engler and the current asshat in the White House- for laying the foundations for our economic plight and then making sure it doesn't get fixed. That's what forced us to move our primary up: we wanted our problems addressed, and we wanted to have a wide array of candidates to address those problems, not the two candidates that we usually get by the time our primay has rolled around in the past.

If i am not mistaken if Michigan had another primary all the Republicans could vote as well and since they have a presumptive nominie they could vote for the Democratic Candidate Least Likely To Succeed.

Am i right?

Nope. It would have been Democrats only. On the ballots, that is- open to all voters, funded privately. You don't have to register one way or the other to vote in our primaries. You had to in '88, iirc, but that law was shot down.

And if your point is that Republicans would show up and vote for Clinton, I could make the argument that they'd vote for Obama, thinking him the beatable candidate in November.

Either way they skew the results and i don't think it makes any sense or is fair.

Peter G @ 146:

Proud2bHumble Hus(in)sein @ 139:

Cockles of my cold black heart still warm from last nite - thank you's my friends ;-}

Need a jumpstart for that heart. I use 00 welding cable for those extra amps.

I wonder if those would work on Charleton Heston?

By the way, did they take his firearm after he died or was he buried with it?

Andy K Jong Il @ 143:

xoites defends Constitution @ 134:

Andy K Jong Il @ 129:

billy simpson @ 97-

I'm a Michigander who voted for "uncommitted" in January, and if I could have, I'd have voted for Edwards. If we held another primary tomorrow, I'd probably vote for Obama.

But it's Obama's supporters in our Congress who won't sign on to a new primary. They see something that you don't: without Detroit- or, more realistically, without the support of the scandal-ridden Mayor of Detroit, Kwame Kilpatrick, who controls the political machine there, Obama would stand a good chance at suffering a defeat here. Possibly an ugly defeat. He might squeak out Wayne County, but Oakland and Macomb Counties (almost certainly the latter) would most probably go to Clinton. Obama might take Livingston County (Ann Arbor) and the Lansing area, Kent County(Grand Rapids) would be a toss up, as I think would Kalamazoo County, but the backwards-ass rural north of the state would definitely go to Clinton.

So don't blame her for playing it smart and keeping her name on the ballot earlier, and don't blame her for our lack of a real primary.

But you can blame the GOP- both the former Governor, John Fucking Engler and the current asshat in the White House- for laying the foundations for our economic plight and then making sure it doesn't get fixed. That's what forced us to move our primary up: we wanted our problems addressed, and we wanted to have a wide array of candidates to address those problems, not the two candidates that we usually get by the time our primay has rolled around in the past.

If i am not mistaken if Michigan had another primary all the Republicans could vote as well and since they have a presumptive nominie they could vote for the Democratic Candidate Least Likely To Succeed.

Am i right?

Nope. It would have been Democrats only. On the ballots, that is- open to all voters, funded privately. You don't have to register one way or the other to vote in our primaries. You had to in '88, iirc, but that law was shot down.

And if your point is that Republicans would show up and vote for Clinton, I could make the argument that they'd vote for Obama, thinking him the beatable candidate in November.

Andy, I have to disagree. The repugnantcants want to go against Clinton. Faux Snooze is all over that. They think she will be easier to beat.

xoites defends Constitution @ 147:

Peter G @ 146:

Proud2bHumble Hus(in)sein @ 139:

Cockles of my cold black heart still warm from last nite - thank you's my friends ;-}

Need a jumpstart for that heart. I use 00 welding cable for those extra amps.

I wonder if those would work on Charleton Heston?

By the way, did they take his firearm after he died or was he buried with it?

I believe they decided to leave it in his hands to give him a better chance of getting past St Peter.