MTP: Harwood Likens Hillary's Cleavage To Barry Bond's Doping
By Nicole Belle Saturday Jul 28, 2007 12:45pm![]()
Download | play
Download | play (Thanks to David for the video)
Ah, the quality of political discourse these days. Never mind that we're involved in an unwinnable quagmire costing the country thousands of lives and billions of dollars. Never mind that we have an administration that is actively obstructing justice and has politicized nearly every department of government. Never mind that we have millions of people in this country living below the poverty level in the "richest country on Earth". The thing that is REALLY important is that the female Democratic presidential contender has (*gasp*) BREASTS, and she wore a blouse one day that (*double gasp*) revealed ever-so-slightly that she is in possession of said breasts.
Of course, for John Harwood of the Wall Street Journal, Hillary's blouse was a calculated move...








Login or Register to post comments.
May I be the frist to ask, what's wrong with breasts?
no comment.
Why are these people afraid of breasts? I swear, most men really don't like women. They may be attracted to them, but they don't trust them, don't want to talk to them and generally just don't like them. They're schoolyard children afraid of kooties.
I tuned into that show this morning, and couldn't stand it for more than a few minutes.
Word is out to plant the seed in everybody's minds that Clinton and Obama are the only two, clear, leading, intelligent choices. Nobody else matters. "It's probably going to be Clinton" is what everybody is supposed to remember.
The talking heads want Clinton; then it will be a bitter presidential race and is the only way the 'cons might be able to steal the office again.
I cannot watch mainstream media anymore. It pollutes the minds of all Americans.
calculated?I don't think so.But this does show the level that some people will stoop to.4 more years of a Clinton would be far better than anything the repug's could provide.Attacking HC because of some cleavage is ludicris.I suppose they would like to see women dress in nothing but dresses below the knee.The one thing have accomplished is pissing off alot of women..as for the media,I think there are more important issues to be discussed..
Is it me or did the video have nothing to do with breasts? I just saw a string of Hillary and Obama clips but nobody mentioned her cleavage.
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
Stupid Git @ 3:
Maybe they'll cover her up with a tarp next time she is speaking in front of the camera... sort of like what Ashcroft did with the bare breasted statues behind him.
Schadenfreude @ 6:
I'd like to see this alleged cleavage popping video. I've heard quite a few comments that it was nothing.
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
Schadenfreude @ 6:
Yeah, me too....Saw/heard NOTHING even closely relating to cleavage/breasts, so whey
the C&L commentary above????
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
That is correct Mr. Harwood, Hilliary has used The Clear Cream to enlarge her breasts, and it also explains why she has been hitting so many debate questions out of the park.
....
Sure seems to me the clip doesn't match the headline.
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
It would be terrific if America's culture could grow out of it's chortling, giggling, sniggering adolescent phase before it does more damage to the planet and humanity.
i wish hillary would keep her boobs out of this...
btw, the vid highlights hillary's failed attempt to paint herself as the more experienced candidate...
i bet she'll be wearing a push-up bra next week...
jharp @ 11:
Agreed. Why the commentary in this thread by C&L???
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
Titties are good. Don't be doggin' the titties. Just because these asswipes can't get her for a 400.00 haircut, they gotta slag her cones? Give me a break.
She's showing less cleavage than the average female cast on any CSI episode. THIS makes news? Shoot me now.
Is it any wonder that if the rest of the world is not busy hating our guts they laughing their asses off at us? It's a good thing I don't travel outside U.S. borders, I would be too fearful and ashamed.
Wrong clip posted???
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
Nicole: Are you monitoring this? Why the C&L "lead in" commentary above when
video clips played on Meet the Press have absolutley NO connection????
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
WASHINGTON POST REACHES NEW LOW: REPORTS HILLARY’S BREASTS ‘TACK TO THE RIGHT’
Schadenfreude @ 6:
I think this is wrong clip.
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
Blue Buddha @ 7:
Now that you mention Ashcroft,one has to wonder why a far right neocon like him resigned his position..that to me raised a big question.
Oops. I think this is *the* wrong clip.
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
relax kids, it's across the board. next week they are going to discuss the stategic capabilities of rudi mcromney's saggy ball sack.
but seriously folks. i think lots of men would be happy if american women wore burquas and were beaten for showing a wrist or ankle.
i suspect some people have one foot in some closet, if you know what i mean.
The windows media link does link to a clip of Harwood's comments.
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
Don Davis @ 20:
Certainly hope that those of you who click on this website will note that is
if "FAKE NEWS"....picture was photocroped..
Theo @ 25:
oops, I meant "does not"
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
I watched MTP this morning....this is the wrong clip.
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
OOOPS!!!!!!!!!!! I confused the video names. Sorry, guys.
I put the right videos up.
[Thanks Nicole. The right video is up now kids-Sitemonitor]
It was the "Ignore The Important News of the Week" on MTP this mornings. 55 minutes of show and Tim "Liberal Bias" Russert dedicated the last five minutes before the adds for GE, BP, Luvox, and other corps. to Gonzales and his mockery of DoJ department. What did he spend the bulk of his show on? Clinton's and Obama's pissing match on who's the better foreign policy maker.
Liberal Media my ass.
Good job Tim on selling us out more.
ok back to discussing titties.......
yeah, uhhhh, this is the wrong clip. All I see is hillary and obama takin swipes at each other.. nothing there about funbags, whatsoever.
[Yeah, uhhhh, It's been fixed-Sitemonitor]
it's a shame, I wanted to hear the spineless commentary on hillary's boobs and why the mere flashing of the top-skin off of one makes every man desperately afraid of doing something dumb in order to touch them. When will male-dominated societies finally learn to control their testosterone instead of blaming the natural power of women for their own weaknesses?
for the love of jeebus........
oops, disregard the 'wrong-clip thing, it took me too long to post before she fixed it. thanx, C&L peeps
I think Hillary would do much better if she dressed like a prostitute. The "mainstream press" would leave her appearence alone and she'd certainly win over Republican men, that's for sure.
Nicole: Appreciate corrected video; BUT still am in the dark as to exactly what
the big hubba ba loo was all about. Is there something(video/clip) out there that
can give me/us a better understanding as to what this titty discussion was all about???
if she dressed like a little boy she would rile up the religous right....and a whole bunch of repug conngressmen
Doggiebobo @ 35:
What I'm trying to communicate is...where are the clips of this revealing blouse Hillary wore?
Doggiebobo @ 35:
I believe HC went on the Senate floor and exposed about a inch of cleavage...
'tis better to have boobs than be a boob...
I saw it ...and didn't even notice it until they made a stink over it....they should get their minds out of the gutter.
Boobies!!! when all else fails you, when you've played the 9/11 card so many times nobody cares anymore, when 1/2 your candidates supported pro-choice movements at one time or another, when your party is so embarrassing that you can't argue experience, qualifications, or even that puppet like quality you seem to like so much in your current leader...what do you do?!? Oh me oh my!!! It's Boobies to the rescue!!! I've always said thank God for boobies (*but then I was always a little adolescent) now the Repug's can once again join me in a roaring round of Halle-boob-jah Halle-boob-jah, haalllleee-boooob-jah!
Question:
Are we given the choice of having Hillary's Boobs in the Whitehouse or a Republican Boob (pick one of the candidates) ?
breasts? what are these "breasts" and how come i've never seen any?
oh, it's because i live at home with my parents.
If we think about Hillary's breasts we won't have to think about her humorless face or her 180 degree turn from staying in Iraq "if you don't like it vote for someone else" just 4 months ago to her stunning all-pink-sweetheart-harmless-wardrobe turnaround of "the injustice of it all, bring the troops home".
Yes, think of Hillary's breasts, it's easier.
Bonds and Clinton,Oil and boobs,hmmm.....I'll take the oilnboobs...anyday
gop agenda always,but now is just as good
deceive
smear
distract
mudshark @ 38:
AN INCH OF BOOBAGE? Coulter wears the same sleezy cocktail dress day in, day out. Vitter's wife wears some slutty leopard print getup to a press conference, don't get me started on Fred Thompson's wife. And gasp, Hillary shows some cleavage and it warrants an op-ed in some right wing news paper. Geez. If that's the best they could come up with, Hillary is a shoein for '08.
Doggiebobo, we don't have the clip, but here's the article from WaPo (there's a picture):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/19/AR200707...
Hillary has BREASTS???
OMG - Next you'll tell me that Bill has a PENIS!
Oh, the humanity!!
(The next sound you hear will be me pounding my head on the keyboard)
Harwood doesn't like breasts, but prefers a mans, hairy, flat chest anyday.
Ya know, I've never heard anybody reply to this stuff with "Man, you're really an aBLEEP. With all the real problems around to try to solve, you bring up sBLEEP like this? Get the fBLEEP out of here and don't come back." Now, that would be a lip reading session to watch over and over.
The question is: What did Hillary's breasts communicate to John Har(d)wood? Are they as communicative as John Edwards' hair? And who the hell needs Ruper Murdoch when the WSJ reporter pulls this crap on MTP?
Limp-Dick Blimpaugh @ 50:
Maybe he has breasts tattooed on his back?
Thanks for the link Nicole. But the repugs call THAT cleavage? Wow. They made it sound as if she showed up in a Victoria's Secret push up bra.
Sounds like John Harwood is trying to weasel his way into the good graces of Murdoch, by adopting Faux News-style smears, to prepare for when Murdoch takes over the WSJ. He's got ambitions.
You think these guys make their escorts (hookers) wear Burkas?
We know Vitter like to wear the provocative astronait diapers, but what does she wear?
Thats what I like about someof these shows. They like to address Hillary's wardrobe while Gonzales continues to currupt our legal system.
And supporting the troops by not reporting the Bush support your troops by leaving them in an Iraq occupation endlessly with no goal and no identifiable enemy. Then casting them aside when returning with injuries.
I am sure they are comfortable in their air conditioned studio..............
Who knew that all these "Journos" had the hots for Hilary...
What a bunch of moronic twits (insert eyes rolling here)
mr.ed@51, d'ya mean "asshole, shit and fuck"?
all you tit-chasers miss the point: wsj and fux noise is a perfect match!
why is anyone concerned that murdoch will have control of that rag that employs tony snow wannabees?
your voyeurism is touching, though! and telling!
Strawberry @ 47:
My gosh, what some news reporters(?); better described as "entertainers", will do for
a story. Go Hillary
I've seen much more cleavage cunningly displayed by Fred Thompson's trophy wife - you know, the wife who is running for president under the guise of Fred "Dumb as Hell" Thompson.
Hey, Greg Palast is on this week's NOW on PBS talking about caging. Just make sure you take a Xanax before viewing.
Strawberry @ 54:
Here's the sad part - She did!
Does this mean that Republican women don't have tits?
Wow, these media idiots are..... idiots.
OMGZ, women have breasts!!! Some have ( shudder) cleavage!!
Why not report issues instead of junk?
What's next, reporting on the male candidates crotches, does it hang to the left or right pants leg, or is it too short to hang either way?
After years of unsuccessfully trying to unseat and discredit Mrs. Clinton by attacking her legs and butt (I remind you of Rush Limbaugh's factually inaccurate habit of calling her the 'Arkansas broadbeam' you see, Hillary is from Chicago (at least the dope addled radio host managed to place her in the proper hemisphere) and his undying insistance that Webster use a picture of her legs after the definition of the word "cankles" in their next revision) I guess it was only to be expected that in the normal course of events they would get around to attacking her breasts. These juvenille attacks about her physical attributes only prove that they are at a loss to beat her in the arena of ideas and politics. She's much, much smarter than they are which forces them to resort to these school yard tactics which only serves to marginalize them and shine a bright and focusing light that exposes them for the lame and impotent fools that they are.
I suppose it's only a matter of time before they go after her overbite and with Limbaugh's penis fixation we all know where that discussion is bound to go.
Are these the same people who giggled, gaffawed and spoke in wonder of the magnificent gym sock & parachute strap enhanced presidential package of resolve and determination on display during the voyage of the USS Mission Accomplished?
Dear sweet God--
Apparently Harwood knows which side of his bread is about to be buttered... when Rupert takes control of the WSJ Harwood has proof that he knows how to obfuscate with the best of News Corp's other "journalists".
"Hillary has boobies... and they're kind of stickie out... and I saw them and they made me feel icky".
WTF?
Annoyed Canuck @ 64:
Yes, they do, but the better question is, do you want to see them? Think Mean Jean. Barbara Bush. Condy Rice.
if she gets in the white house again, once she is safely in there. you know she's going to wear halter tops and daisy dukes to press briefings. you thought bush was bad???
Are republican men now suggesting that women in the United States go to wearing the type of clothing that Muslim countries mandate their women do.....thought they didn't agree with anything associated with the Muslim culture.
Wayne @ 65:
Are they idiots, or do they just know how to get into the good graces of their corporate masters by parroting said masters' talking points?
And I say, if you say something that dickish, you are completely owned by the Republican party.
myiq2xu @ 49:
Let's just be glad that she doesn't have one of those icky vaginas too!
God help us (disclaimer; recognized common figure of speech)
Pick some banal topic like this, hold it up and maybe we won't notice the Bosch painting of hell just behind it come to life which is the repug party.
Strawberry @ 69:
Which Barbara? Jenna's sister or the one on the Quaker Oats box?
Any of you clicking on Nicole's #48 above, note that by clicking on
"Robin Givhan"(author of the trash piece) you can send him/her an
email and let that asshole know how you feel about his/her piece of
garbage appearing in the Wash. Post. I did so, and feel better already.
Hmmmm...saw the video, glanced at the related story, looked at the picture, which would have been very easily overlooked by those with better things to do with their days...
And now it has come down to this. Our media is looking at the boobs of a presidential candidate and is continuing to ignore our need to impeach the boob currently residing in the White House.
I think we are doomed.
Otay @ 55:
Dewey Kneadleeders @55
Apparently Harwood knows which side of his bread is about to be buttered... when Rupert takes control of the WSJ Harwood has proof that he knows how to obfuscate with the best of News Corp's other "journalists".
Sorry, otay, you got to the point while I was still composing-- great minds and all
the repugs must know that they don't stand a chance..the funny part is they keep digging in deeper and deeper...and they want to keep running the country even after they almost ruined it.dumbass's
Good golly, Mr. Harwood is an idiot. After that comment, he should never be invited back on the show.
why this discussion? my despair deepens.
Oh, Mr. Harwood! Sometimes a codpiece is just a codpiece!
It's official, the Meet The Press show is a joke, a parody on current politics.
It's not a bona-fide show. It's a joke, and Tim Russert is the biggest joker of all time.
"I get to shake hands and have dinner with President, and you dont" little Timmy Russert.
[...] Clark Contact the Webmaster Link to Article hillary clinton MTP: Harwood Likens Hillary’s Cleavage To Barry Bond’s Doping » [...]
Please stop......I just had lunch....
Condi Rice can show a lot of leg, or breast, or whatever
and there is no problem. HRC shows just a tad and there is a shit storm. Something is wrong with picture.
c
Could it be the media? Heaven forbid.
PS have to add this guys. If you got 'em flaunt 'em and by the way they seem to drive republicans wild. They do like to run to the pay per view (prostitutes) to see them. You know, getting caught, sneaking in, constantly changing wives and mistresses, all that good stuff.
myiq2xu @ 76:
losing my lunch now.
For those who really need to see H.C. and breasts in the same picture :)
http://www.radosh.net/images/hillary_and_natalie.jpg
Allright... they're not Hillary's... :o
jace @ 86:
And then we have to listen to the mouthbreathers, some of whom troll on this site, cry that we have a "librul media". Pulleease.
HoooH boy. Edwards' haircut. Hillary's cleavage. Fred Thompson's after shave. Glad to hear that THIS election, unlike '04 is going to be about the important issues of the day. Gimme a break.
€Punk @ 89:
Natalie for VP!!!
I dare say that this is indicitive of the glass ceiling:ie...sexism by the media and the repug party
a guy @ 92:
That look on Hillary's face is kinda disturbing.
I'm not all that fond of Hillary,but I think she would make a very good Prez.Maybe even a great one.
One word, burka. Put the damned women, all women, in burkas.
(As much as males try to blame women for male sexual response, and their masculine inability to cope with their responses, no female-centric solution seems to work. Of course, it does make it easier to blame females for them. "Why if she hadn't revealed her ankle from beneath the burka, I would have never spilled milk. Let's stone the slut.")
The media obsesses about Hillary's lady lumps, meanwhile Tweety's man-crush on Fredrick of Hollywood continues uunabated.
A six year old has more psychosexual maturity.
If interested, you can go to the Wall Street Journal and send them an email
expressing your displeasure/dissatisfaction with John Harwood's reporting..
Email: feedback@wsj.com
Makes me feel much better to let him/them know what a total and complete
idiot and fool Harwood is.
PS. Just think, should R. Murdoch be approved to by DowJones, what will
the Journal look/read like in the future. Scary
Consider who Harwood is, who employs him.
Harwood is a whore.
Far more shocking would be the revelation by the Transexuals for Truth (a group with ties to Karline Rove) that Hillary has a (gasp) vagina.
Murdoch is just the final nail in the coffin. Talk about projecting obsessions.
After a few moments of reflection I am reminded of what having breasts did for Katherine Harris' political career.
Who can forget her "I'm in it to win and these are the twins" interview on Hannity & Colmes?
Cover 'em up Hillary, cover 'em up!
dinkface @ 102:
Yeah..I remember seeing Harris stick those things right up into the camera....they almost poked my eyes out in my living room.....
mudshark @ 95:
crazylove @ 44:
Repugs would like nothing more than to have Hillary be the dem nominee raw meat dangling over their snapping jaws.
They'd like nothing more than to steal another election from a corrupt democrat.
Either way, we're still flatlined. (don't bother getting up)
crazylove @ 58:
Yo, I tried to present this as you'd hear it. Read my lips.
crazylove @ 104:
...Like I said I'm not all that fond of HC...my choice for Prez is Wes Clark...but having read her bio...she is a very intelligent person.....I am annoyed at her meeting with Murdoch,which really cancels her out for me.But that's not to say she would be a bad Prez.She may very well be a very good one...lets see what she says and does.She screwed up on voting for the war as well...Obama on the other hand is also looking very intelligent but lacks experience in foriegn policy but aside from that he looks like he too could be a very good Prez,I don't think he's been bought yet.But to me Clark is all of the above and more.
mr.ed @ 105:
Or YOU, instead of the soft-peddling, weasle like C.Wallce, can go to
feedback@wsj.com
and let them know how you feel about John Harwood. More of us need
to let the MSM and their sponsors know how we feel about their lack
of factual/accurate/important news events.
But I'll bet you when push comes to shove in the Gen Election(if it's HC)she will kick the shit out of anyone who try's to take her down.She will be more aggresive and more ruthless to her apponent to make sure she wins........which might not be a bad thing.
mudshark @ 103:
Now I'm losing my lunch. Breakfast too, it looks like.
John Harwood has lost whatever shred of credibility he was hanging on to. He shouldn't be given this perch on MTP or even Keith Olbermann anymore. His lurch into Fox Noise territory is indeed a move to kiss up to the right and Murdoch after the WSJ grab.
You gotta hand it to the clinton's they try to cash in on everything
Clinton seeks ‘cleavage’ cash
myiq2xu @ 109:
In the last election I really liked the way the Bushit's hung her out to dry.....couldn't of happened to more deserving pie hole.
He got sooooooo turned on gawking at her cleavage that he got a woody on and that's something he usually saves only for his boyfriend lover.
Katherine Harris was never anything but comic relief intended to distract us from the real issues. I mean, way back in 2000 her nickname was "Cruella DeVille."
Unfortunately for Turdblossom and the GOP, the stench of corruption and hypocrisy was too strong.
So now they're hoping the voters have ADD. "Iraq? Uh, HEY LOOK - TITS."
I think we see a fear of Hillary that these reougs can't hide. My e-mail is loaded with personally disparaging things about her from repug friends when confronted with their fear they say she will ruin America My response you mean like I've been saying about your boy Bush for the last 6 yrs.
Is there really a fear of Hillary among the right-wing PTB? If so, why would Murdoch support her?
I'm thinking it's either:
1) The PTB think they can beat Hillary if she wins the Primary and makes it to the general election, or
2) The PTB think that Hillary is the most right-wing of the bunch.
I tend towards believing 1) above, but I'm open to argument.
Hey, when Murdoch buys the WSJ, maybe he'll make Hillary a Page 3 girl!
Otay....whats PTB?........i must be having a brain fart.
Hillary’s blouse was a calculated move…
Yes, the schemer. She's actually making decisions about what to wear! Why can't she be more like Laura Bush, who simply throws on whatever's on top of the pile on the floor of the closet?
These lapdog media and their GOP masters remind me of Beavis and Butthead, but not as mature or intelligent.
"Heh Heh. He said 'butt'"
Slutty bitch, another Janet Jackson if you ask me :)
Republicans hate us for our freedoms.
mudshark @ 118:
Powers That Be.
thanks......
g @ 119:
It's all part of meme put out by the Repugnant Noise Machine - like Al Gore's "earth tones" and John Edward's anti-poverty campaign. No Democrat can be genuine or "real," everything they say and do (or wear) is just part of a cold, calculated political strategy.
In psychological terms it's called "projection."
Hmm. Wonder how Harwood felt about W's package enhancing flightsuit the day he landed on that aircraft carrier to announce our victory in Iraq?
Patrick Girouard @ 126:
Let's just say he was sooo impressed his arm was sore for days afterwards.
Otay @ 116:
Thugs have wanted Hillary because she won't be serving the people. Note her sudden turnaround on Iraq, in just 4 months!!! Recall the Newsweek cover 1 1/2 years ago calling her "the phenomenon"? Her popularity was something like 16% at the time and didn't budge, somebody is pushing her.
If Soros likes a candidate we can trust it, but If Murdock gives cash to Hillary there's a circle-jerk going on. That can only be bad for us if given the above, she gets a nomination, kill me.
What do we think about the boobs at the WSJ?
I think John Edwards has a hell of a basket. Obama, too. What's up with Mitt Romney? He seems to hang on one side of the seam one day, the other side the next. And why am I seeing a camel toe on John McCain?
Candidates' body parts are so much more interesting than actual issues. Ralph Nader needs to wax his eyebrows.
Bye-ee!
Harwood: Hillary's Cleavage = Barry Bond's Doping
Ah, the quality of political discourse these days. Never mind that we’re involved in an unwinnable quagmire costing thousands of lives and billions of dollars, that we have an administration that is actively obstructing justice and has politicized ne...
FreeDUMB @ 129:
Sagging and dropping as each day passes.
I think Meet the Press should give equal time to the discussion of the male member of all male candidates. Right or left...etc.
‘08 Election Coverage: More Cleavage… Less Issues
Robin Givhan’s WaPo column on Hillary Clinton’s cleavage has become the latest piece of tacky journalism that keeps on giving. Today, Deborah Howell bemoans the fact that the WaPo “got thousands of angry letters and calls last week &...
Perhaps these men think that she might carry a few more brains in her breasts than they do in their penises (peni?). Honestly. Men fear a woman with brains more than anything on earth... don't they know that men are happier if they marry a woman who is smart?
http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-Secret-of-a-Happy-Marriage-The-Smart-...
Maybe we will be happier as a country if we elect Hillary... Certainly electing a dumb president hasn't helped us any.
These war-apologist pundits, who practically saluted W's asinine cod-piece on the aircraft carrier, now wanna pretend they're scandalized shrinking violets flush with a bout of the vapors, like a spinster aunt character out of a Henry James novel. And all just because Hillary Clinton dares to wear something slightly more feminine than a Power Suit. And as others here have pointed out, it's completely hypocritical considering they pretend to take Ann Coulter and her calculated naughty/sleaze attire seriously.
In a way this is a total non-story, but taboos are always interesting, and this one does touch on the fact that even in the 21st century a large segment of America, no matter how sophisticated they suppose themselves to be, remains childish and twisted up inside about sexuality and female power. And at core that is one of the biggest, deepest problems with our society.
Forrest Greene @ 130:
If someone waves dog-poo under one's nose, it's just for an unfortunate second.
That's why we seek alternative news sources with real journalism and intellectual discussion.
(it's also why life is lighter without cable tv)
gempei @ 16:
Heck, she shows less cleavage than the Fox News Reader Bobblehead Babes.
Leonard @ 133:
You know I can find pictures of almost anything, do you? ;)
Beleve me we do NOT need extra footage of the male members...
http://www.poormojo.org/pmjadaily/images/hung_cheney.jpg
The Repubs have no comment when one of their own is sent to jail for stealing or has to resign because he's a PERv but to comment on the shaddow...a simple crease/outlining the modest definition of a ladys breasts...they feel this is worthy?
lewisnclark @ 135:
Hear, hear...very well said and accurate..
Yet Rudy can put on a wig and a dress and nobody seems to care.
Do the wrongwinger(used to be called rightwingers, but when was the last time they been right about anything?) really want to go there?
Did they have a couple of porn star running for office in the last November election for the seats in congress? Mary Carey and Mimi Miyagi anyone? They said nada a thing about them showing it all, and Hillary wore a blouse, and I am surprise with their reaction you think the only place a woman could get a blouse would be from the black market.
My problem with this story is who is driving it and why?
Freaked-Out Canadian @ 12:
My God! This is what passes for political reporting nowadays? hillary's breasts?? Why dont you sniggering, prepubescent middleschool graders GROW THE FUCK UP!!!
FOCUS, FOCUS, YOU ASSHOLES; THERE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THINGS TO "REPORT" ON THAN FEMALE BREASTS!!!
CafeenMan @ 1:
There's nothing wrong with breasts. But tits are even better.
[...] And, look away Givhan should have done with Hillary Clinton, instead of making a sexist issue out of Clinton’s style that day. Shawn Mullen on TMV notes, “this cleavage thing is beyond silly.” But, lest we forget just how whacked some in the media are, C&L has video of John Harwood of the WSJ, claiming “Hillary’s blouse was a calculated move.” [...]
Is Harwood auditioning for Murdock? Or is he just a pinhead?
To quote the the ever astute Elmer Fudd:
"Silly wabbit, tits are for kids!"
Login or Register to post comments.