It's interesting how bonkers the media and the far right wingers are about our comment sections. Well, in the heavily vetted Malkin site, this one stood out. Claiming the Clintons were responsible for a murder in AR to tell Obama that he would be assassinated if he doesn't fall in line is as sick as it gets. If my resources increase---maybe I'll be able to screen out people as extensively as Michelle. Maybe Howard Kurtz will have us on Reliable Sources to discuss this outrage. I think it merits a little talk.

Gavin has more.



Login or Register to post comments.

166 comments

wow!

You will probably find Fake News, Sean Hannity Lecture in the killer's home

I was hoping against hope the the Limbaughs of the world would come out strongly against the killing and denounce the perpetrator. Anything less is encouraging their addle-brained listeners. I wonder if the righty talkers are even dimly aware of the blood on their hands from the Unitarian church murders in Knoxville.

My own personal feelings are that somehow the Klan is involved.
Malkin? eh.
A friend of mines wife looks just like her, but she's a raging Dem.
Yeah, I like to piss her off by calling her Michelle.: )
(just a little)

{ Sorry, but there is no way I would allow that to be posted. I understand where your coming from. Maybe you can find another way to do it. But I can't allow it in that form. Sorry. SiteMonitor}

I wonder how these people manage to breathe.

And this is yet another reason why Hillary Clinton is a bad choice for VP. She's a freaking psycho magnet. People who hate Obama for being black hate Hillary Clinton more for being Hillary Clinton.

if the quote is to be interpreted, then the shooting should be attributed to Obama as a threat to the Clintons. except that since the clintons are to blame for everything, why not work them into the lies in the usual manner?

Wrong again. Just another insane Rush Limpdick and Bill O'fuckhead listener gone haywire.

I live in Little Rock. Before anyone jumps to conclusions they should check out http://www.arktimes.com/blogs/arkansasblog/2008/08/capitol_ave_crime_sce... for more details.

The shooter went a few blocks down the street to the Arkansas State Baptist HQ and brandished his gun and left. That's how the police were able to get on his trail.

Jeon Ji-Yung @ 6:

And this is yet another reason why Hillary Clinton is a bad choice for VP. She's a freaking psycho magnet. People who hate Obama for being black hate Hillary Clinton more for being Hillary Clinton.

You're right. So Obama better pick Joe Liemoreman for his VP. We cannot go a whole term without someone from Yale as president or vice president.

Jeon Ji-Yung @ 6:

And this is yet another reason why Hillary Clinton is a bad choice for VP. She's a freaking psycho magnet. People who hate Obama for being black hate Hillary Clinton more for being Hillary Clinton.

that made no sense whatsoever, not one bit of sense at all.

Someone call the CDC because I believe a pandemic has broken out over this country.

It is either 'republicanism' or 'neoconism'. The former would be wider-spread than the latter.

Is there a cure, if not, why not?

Right "Clinton War Machine" meanwhile Dick Cheney and Zalmay Khalilzad are manning the nuclear button in Washington warning that “Russian aggression will not go unanswered”.

Sorry, please refrain from that language.
John Amato...

Wow, people like this continue to prove to all that they are sad, small, and deranged people. Things like this make me ill.

John @ 10:

I live in Little Rock. Before anyone jumps to conclusions they should check out http://www.arktimes.com/blogs/arkansasblog/2008/08/capitol_ave_crime_sce... for more details.

The shooter went a few blocks down the street to the Arkansas State Baptist HQ and brandished his gun and left. That's how the police were able to get on his trail.

So what do you think, he was an Atheist Democrat looking for revenge? Hahahaha! Ah, doubtful.

Malkin got an email from somebody reminding her that the kind of hate she spreads spawns murderous rampages,but she wasn't buying it,although she was kind enough to post the guys email address as befits her own inimitable character.She obviously doesn't feel the least bit responsible for any of this.Apparently dressing up in a cheer leader's outfit while shrieking about "nut root" liberal traitors who should all be thrown into concentration camps qualifies as high minded political discourse.

krisken @ 16:

Wow, people like this continue to prove to all that they are sad, small, and deranged people. Things like this make me ill.

You must be sick quite much of late.

Just wanted to say, "Thanks John", for not putting that disgusting photo of Malkin up:) lol

Charles @ 19:

krisken @ 16:

Wow, people like this continue to prove to all that they are sad, small, and deranged people. Things like this make me ill.

You must be sick quite much of late.

All the time. Sometimes even here.

At least Sen Clinton released a statement early on regarding this tragedy.

I read this site daily and I'm a big fan but posting comments from Malkins readers on the site as if they're newsworthy is a very Bill O'reilly thing to do. He unfairly does it with DailyKos all the time. I'd like to think we're above that.

This is probably just another rightwing nutjob killing liberals for the hell of it. After listening to all the hateful wingnut hacks on talk radio and Fox News, these propaganda sponges begin to think liberals/democrats really are anti-American, cut & run appeasers, and commie socialists scum.

Thanks Hannity, Rush, and Billo for all you do to keep America united!

abarts @ 22:

At least Sen Clinton released a statement early on regarding this tragedy.

Seconded. Last thing we need is a link to that ridiculous cheer leading video she did. I think I threw up in my mouth on that one.

Marc @ 23:

I read this site daily and I'm a big fan but posting comments from Malkins readers on the site as if they're newsworthy is a very Bill O'reilly thing to do. He unfairly does it with DailyKos all the time. I'd like to think we're above that.

Read a few of the threads. There's nothing we're above. There's crazy in every philosophy.

** waits for BillO to call out Malkin and her KKK-esque website **

I could be wrong - but the reason the quote was printed was to show how crazy the righwingnuts can get...and earlier on the thread below discussing this poor man's death- things got very strange- and there were some uncomfortable comments about his death and WHO was to blame....

This evening, I watch Billo take great pleasure in describing a post from the Huffington website about a vet group and trying to paint it as the fault of the site owner.

As being pointed out so many times, will these fools hold themselves to the same standards?

I'm surprised that the NRA hasn't jumped in with comments. Like "If only the victim had been packing a loaded handgun in his briefcase, he could have stood a 50% chance of survival in a shootout."

malkin is a f#cking gop whore and
nothing more than a female version of billo

People like Malkin are a cancer on the American soul and they are threatening to destroy the last vestage of unity and common purpose in this country.

These amoral sociopathic sick &^%% care nothing of the consequences of their words, as long as they make their millions in tv, radio, and selling books.

I would mock them if they weren't so goddamn damaging to this country.

Jeon Ji-Yung @ 7:

And this is yet another reason why Hillary Clinton is a bad choice for VP. She's a freaking psycho magnet. People who hate Obama for being black hate Hillary Clinton more for being Hillary Clinton.

Spoken like a true sociopath. You weren't in Arkansas today, were you?

Hillary Clinton killed Vince Forster and Bill murdered Jon Benet Ramsey.

What's to talk about?

Oh, yeah, and Bill Clinton hired Jack Ruby to kill Oswald who killed Clinton's boyhood hero.

My right-wing relatives will have this referenced in a badly spelled, poorly argued, ungrammatical, multi-font, much-forwarded e-mail entitled "America Beware" within the week.

Why are you posting Malkin's spittle? She's not newsworthy nor are her opinions. But, it was only a matter of time before she vomited something out.

Marc @ 23:

I read this site daily and I'm a big fan but posting comments from Malkins readers on the site as if they're newsworthy is a very Bill O'reilly thing to do. He unfairly does it with DailyKos all the time. I'd like to think we're above that.

thank you.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

If you have time, check out this news piece from 1963...a "man on the street interview" after Kennedy's assassination. Pay particular attention to the first guy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_qysmz-d-Y&NR=1

The more things change...

The quote says that it is a message to the Clintons, not from the Clintons. The person killed was a Clintonite so the nutcase poster is saying that Obama is the one sending the message.

this is bad enough but the its not just hate, the radio monopoly has been roves most important tool for laundering talking points and lies into the MSM and pushing the perceived center way right.

as long as the GOP has a talk radio monopoly real democracy and bipartisanship is impossible.

Malkin is a total dork and her fans are even bigger dorks.

Jeon Ji-Yung @ 7:

And this is yet another reason why Hillary Clinton is a bad choice for VP. She's a freaking psycho magnet. People who hate Obama for being black hate Hillary Clinton more for being Hillary Clinton.

Jeon Ji-Yung @ 7:

And this is yet another reason why Hillary Clinton is a bad choice for VP. She's a freaking psycho magnet. People who hate Obama for being black hate Hillary Clinton more for being Hillary Clinton.

She's a woman?? Hmmm... Yep. Powerful woman bad choice for V.P.?? 50+% population of US are women yet a measly 3% of government contracts go to women owned businesses - and in house and senate women are barely represented... Maybe a woman V.P. will nurture us to death... or constantly encourage us to read and do our homework... yep very scary having a woman who is powerful, articulate and tough as V.P. You guys are alienating a good chunk of your base with your hatred of women!

Teacher in Jersey @ 39:

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

If you have time, check out this news piece from 1963...a "man on the street interview" after Kennedy's assassination. Pay particular attention to the first guy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_qysmz-d-Y&NR=1

The more things change...

The more they stay the same. Same people, different time.

Well, we'll see. I'm not jumping to any conclusions, but oh boy, I sure hope this doesn't become a shitstorm of unhinged totalitarian Republican wackjobs...

Damn, I can't believe I clicked on that link!

JR @ 24:

This is probably just another rightwing nutjob killing liberals for the hell of it. After listening to all the hateful wingnut hacks on talk radio and Fox News, these propaganda sponges begin to think liberals/democrats really are anti-American, cut & run appeasers, and commie socialists scum.

Thanks Hannity, Rush, and Billo for all you do to keep America united!

that's quite ignorant of you!

It seems that the guy killed the man whose company laid him off.

Teacher in Jersey @ 39:

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

If you have time, check out this news piece from 1963...a "man on the street interview" after Kennedy's assassination. Pay particular attention to the first guy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_qysmz-d-Y&NR=1

The more things change...

right wing hate groups - who knew?

I think it was a signal to both of them, but I think we should all move away from this kind of talk. It makes me nervous, and now Im nervous about commenting on it. Its a web of nervousness that never ends.


watch Hillary stump for Obama live here

Skeezy @ 40:

The quote says that it is a message to the Clintons, not from the Clintons. The person killed was a Clintonite so the nutcase poster is saying that Obama is the one sending the message.

And the reply asks if it isn't a message from Obama to the Clintons.

Either way, it's pretty fuckin' deranged, no? And the fact that Malkin's site- which, as Amato pointed out, is thoroughly vetted (try to register there right now- I dare ya!)- allows these comments to stand for any amount of time speaks worlds of the mindset of the ring-leaders in Lower Wingnuttia.

fderk @ 49:

I think it was a signal to both of them, but I think we should all move away from this kind of talk. It makes me nervous, and now Im nervous about commenting on it. Its a web of nervousness that never ends.


watch Hillary stump for Obama live here

If the gunman sent a message here, it reads something like, "Wolferines ating my brain on the eve of God's return from Lake Athabasca!" I got five bucks on that, even money.

i highly recommend "the clinton chronicles" which can be viewed on google video or documentarywire.

How ironic that today, in Newsday, a columnist tied in the Tennessee Valley Unitarian Church killings with right-wing hate speech.

Note the following, regarding the shooter:
" Books found in his home included Hannity's "Let Freedom Ring," as well as "Liberalism Is a Mental Health Disorder" by Michael Savage, and "The O'Reilly Factor" by Bill O'Reilly - both outspoken right-wing talk show hosts."

It is a very insightful piece, titled, "Does shock jock hate speech lead to violence?"

ignorant dinosaurs who fear their own predictable extinction

E.L. @ 43: . . .
She's a woman?? Hmmm... Yep. Powerful woman bad choice for V.P.?? 50+% population of US are women yet a measly 3% of government contracts go to women owned businesses - and in house and senate women are barely represented... Maybe a woman V.P. will nurture us to death... or constantly encourage us to read and do our homework... yep very scary having a woman who is powerful, articulate and tough as V.P. You guys are alienating a good chunk of your base with your hatred of women!

Your disconnect from the reality of HRC being a psycho magnet regardless of her gender is appalling.

And your connect to the posters comments to champion your agenda is weak, lame and pitiful.

You've drawn connections between things that have nothing in common, and you've spewed. Very Malkin like . . . and rethug like . . . is that YOU TurdBlossom?

CoIntelPro for Pronktastic Victory Over SCLM, DIEBOLD, ESS and SEQUOIA! @ 47:

. . .

It seems that the guy killed the man whose company laid him off.

Linky please, that's already been disputed by the local Sherrif's Dept . . . . that was about 3pm West Coast time I read it, and THAT had been published at about 2pm East Coast Time . . . 11am here.

alzuben @ 54:

ignorant dinosaurs who fear their own predictable extinction

:D

A quote from a writer at SFGate:

"You are the dinosaurs. We are the meteor. Deal with it."

One of my all time favs . . . :D

This guy was suicidal; if he went from the Dems to a Baptist organization, he was crossing the aisle in a big way and ideology probably wasn't a factor. Surely by now the local authorities have checked on his family, hope there are no horrific scenes waiting to be discovered.

Andy K Jong Il @ 51:

fderk @ 49:

I think it was a signal to both of them, but I think we should all move away from this kind of talk. It makes me nervous, and now Im nervous about commenting on it. Its a web of nervousness that never ends.


watch Hillary stump for Obama live here

If the gunman sent a message here, it reads something like, "Wolferines ating my brain on the eve of God's return from Lake Athabasca!" I got five bucks on that, even money.

One othe thought...If this was a polititical assassination, and it makes you nervous, scared or cowed about commenting on it, then they win.

So what we're saying is that there are people who comment over at Malkin's site and make crazy, unsubstantiated statements. I know it's much further out there and more vile than anything that would be posted here (or at least anything that would be posted here without getting yanked by a moderator), but I don't think we're immune to the crazy, either. There are several fairly nasty comments here already as others have pointed out. I'm sorry if I'm not up for bashing the right-wing kooks tonight, but that earlier thread on the shooting left me with a bad taste in my mouth. We can do better than just "not as bad as they are." Usually this is my favorite site to go to and I'm generally happy to be part of the community, but tonight I'm just disappointed.

Teacher in Jersey @ 39:

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

If you have time, check out this news piece from 1963...a "man on the street interview" after Kennedy's assassination. Pay particular attention to the first guy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_qysmz-d-Y&NR=1

The more things change...

Thank you for posting that.

Thrillhouse @ 60:

So what we're saying is that there are people who comment over at Malkin's site and make crazy, unsubstantiated statements. I know it's much further out there and more vile than anything that would be posted here (or at least anything that would be posted here without getting yanked by a moderator), but I don't think we're immune to the crazy, either. There are several fairly nasty comments here already as others have pointed out. I'm sorry if I'm not up for bashing the right-wing kooks tonight, but that earlier thread on the shooting left me with a bad taste in my mouth. We can do better than just "not as bad as they are." Usually this is my favorite site to go to and I'm generally happy to be part of the community, but tonight I'm just disappointed.

The difference between this site and Malkin's is that ANYONE can come and post a comment here, and they can do it under multiple monikers. At Malkin's site, you wait for a registration window to open- which don't happen too often- sign up and get a password. And if you dare dissent from the popular line over there, you get your registration yanked. When the C&L monitors catch a comment that's beyond the pale- or at least outside the parameters of the commenting policy- the post gets deleted. Seems like those who get banned here are multiple offenders.

CoIntelPro for Pronktastic Victory Over SCLM, DIEBOLD, ESS and SEQUOIA! @ 47:

It seems that the guy killed the man whose company laid him off.

No, it seems the guy was fired this morning from Target for writing graffiti on the wall, therefore the likelihood that it was employment-related is now much smaller than earlier suspected and rumored.

source

More details on the suspect:

Timothy Dale Johnson, 50 yrs. old, of Searcy Arkansas. Many here in AR refer to Searcy as "the holy city." It's by far the most socially-conservative city in the state. Fox news on every TV. James Dobson and Rush (the pill-popping hypocritical asshole Rush, not the cool Canadian rock band Rush) on every radio. For whatever that's worth.

On this subject I assume the case is closed and there will be no additional investigation into the matter since it was a lone nut, disgruntled, who ended up shot dead himself by the police...

Yep, nothing more to say about this subject, just a crazy guy acting all alone.

Sucks for the family though. My condolences. I just hate we couldn't get this guy alive. I want motive.

Little Rock Arkansas is a cesspool of corruption. The Far Right-Wing Conspiracy all began there in 1990 at the Arkansas Republican Party Gubernatorial Campaign Headquarters, also known as The Hilburn Law Firm. The initial conspiracy began in 1990 with a handful of Arkansas Republicans who staged a rogue misinformation campaign against the Clinton Presidential Family; it was that primary catalyst which served as a magnet for Far Right-Wing Radicals breeding anger and hatred against the Clinton Presidential Family by 1993.
The 1990 Arkansas Gubernatorial Republican Party Election Campaign Headquarters shared the same office space on the seventh and eighth floors of the Twin City Bank building with “The Kingmaker” Sam Hilburn’s Law Firm and across the hall, primary vendor Nawojczyk Investigative Services and three doors away, Pulaski County Coroner Steve Nawojczyk’s Office.
The F.B.I. needs to turn over some of the heavy weight rocks in Little Rock and ferret out the snakes.

These people are so delusional..

Get me a fried PBBB, and the Elvis gun...

Malkin thinks the Clintons control her fans???

Are you surprised, really?

E.L. @ 43:

Jeon Ji-Yung @ 7:

And this is yet another reason why Hillary Clinton is a bad choice for VP. She's a freaking psycho magnet. People who hate Obama for being black hate Hillary Clinton more for being Hillary Clinton.

Jeon Ji-Yung @ 7:

And this is yet another reason why Hillary Clinton is a bad choice for VP. She's a freaking psycho magnet. People who hate Obama for being black hate Hillary Clinton more for being Hillary Clinton.

She's a woman?? Hmmm... Yep. Powerful woman bad choice for V.P.?? 50+% population of US are women yet a measly 3% of government contracts go to women owned businesses - and in house and senate women are barely represented... Maybe a woman V.P. will nurture us to death... or constantly encourage us to read and do our homework... yep very scary having a woman who is powerful, articulate and tough as V.P. You guys are alienating a good chunk of your base with your hatred of women!

Who mentioned her being a woman? I said that she attracted psychopaths.

Sounds like they are trying to portray he Clintons as the Mob.

CoIntelPro for Pronktastic Victory Over SCLM, DIEBOLD, ESS and SEQUOIA! @ 47:

JR @ 24:

This is probably just another rightwing nutjob killing liberals for the hell of it. After listening to all the hateful wingnut hacks on talk radio and Fox News, these propaganda sponges begin to think liberals/democrats really are anti-American, cut & run appeasers, and commie socialists scum.

Thanks Hannity, Rush, and Billo for all you do to keep America united!

that's quite ignorant of you!

It seems that the guy killed the man whose company laid him off.

Apology accepted.

CoIntelPro for Pronktastic Victory Over SCLM, DIEBOLD, ESS and SEQUOIA! @ 47, no the guy never worked for any of his businesses. At least that's what's being reported.

stephen @ 52:

i highly recommend "the clinton chronicles" which can be viewed on google video or documentarywire.

And I highly recommend that you put your head back up your ass and leave it there where it belongs.

Well, frankly I would not put it past the Clintons. They carry a lot of water in Arkansas, and that guy "betrayed" them by switching his allegiance from Hillary to Obama. Bill has plenty of connections and money to make this happen if he were so inclined; I am not saying he did, because I have no evidence of that, but to refute it beforehand as a matter of principle is simply naive.

'Hate Speech'!?! Sean Hannity!?! Michelle Malkin!?! Bill O'Reilly!?! Are you kidding me!?! What, are they magicians!?! Do they possess some sort of super-powers!?! Maybe those guys with the tin-foil hats aren't so crazy after all, huh?

So much for, "...but I will defend, to the death, your right to say it.", I guess.

I'm a huge fan of Kieth Olbermann and Thom Hartmann, but if either of them started joking about the shooting of George Wallace in '72, or started discussing hypothetical fantasies about how they "wouldn't shed a tear..." if this or that happened to a conservative, I'd turn them off and be a fan no more. And if I DIDN'T turn them off, then there would d something wrong with ME for listening to it, not them for SAYING it. And if, after hearing some jackass on the radio, you go out and commit crimes of ANY kind as a result, that's on YOU, not the jackass who you think TOLD you to.

You say their verbal diarrhea has no business on the public airwaves, that are intended to inform and serve the public good? I'm with you. You say you wanna boycott their sponsors? Right on! But when you start saying that they share some responsibility for what their listeners do, you're on your own. If you can hear 50 commercials per hour for time-shares and get-rich-quick real estate / stock market / "make a fortune on ebay'" come-ons, without picking up the phone every 10 seconds, then you can't blame anyone for the stupid shit you do but you.

(And don't give me any of that "Well, the genocide in Rwanda..." crap. We're not talking about genocide, and this horrific murder didn't take place in Rwanda.)

Can someone pleeaaase tell me why we have to read tales from the Nut House!

That thing is looks in the mirror and sees Barbie for F5ck sakes and in all sense of the it!!

Elections using the Zimbabwe model. YB's just a bit Afro-centric these days

You're taking things out of Malkins comment section and running them as news worthy editorials? Really? From her cesspool of lies and bullshit that nobody takes seriously?

"Ridiculous!" said the sweaty drunk guy typing with 4 fingers.

YA @ 74:

...I am not saying he did, because I have no evidence of that, but to refute it beforehand as a matter of principle is simply naive.

Well, by your logic, you are just as likely to be responsible as he is.

How come the leftwinger don't have a nutcase going off in a shooting spree?

Hinkley was questionable, as he was a friend of the Bush family, and Reagan was bucking the system when he booted out the crazies in the Bush administration. Hinkley stalk Jimmy Carter as well. So that makes him an independent crazy.

Another shining example of the republicons culture of hate breeding more contempt when their own fall from grace for high crimes and inproprieties.

Neocons hate is self-purpetuating. We need an intevention.

IMPEACH CHENEY AND BUSH NOW!

The Clinton's did it. Who would have thunk it?

That's right, a knuckle dragging, brain-dead idiot conservative.

Couldn't they update their talking points more than once every 15 years? Geeesh?

I know they aren't the sharpest tools in the drawer, but these dumb-ass neoclowns are pathetic.

There ain't no stupid, like republican stupid.

I'm sorry, are trying to cause and uproar aboutt the umpteenth comment on a right wing blog? What exactly are you upset about? We know they're crazy and insane, but I think you're insane for reading all the comments on this post and then blogging about one random right wing lunatic who thinks this is a conspiracy. Seriously, i feel stupid reading this.

paranoia @ 80:

How come the leftwinger don't have a nutcase going off in a shooting spree?...

As I see it, there are two possible reasons:

A) The fact that someone is a "leftwinger" tends to indicate that they have developed the ability to think objectively, and with that comes the power of critical self-analysis. In other words, we can see what huge assholes we'd be if we did, and we think that being an asshole is not a good thing to aspire to.

B) We do, but we are a whole lot better at it.

because they hate our freedoms?

That damned BillO the Clown tonight was talking again about hate speech on the left wing blogs. Then he showed that nut from Focus on the Family who was praying for rain at Obama's Denver speech. Orally literally was claiming that that FOF video was the "worst" of the right wing; he in effect was saying that there was little to no hate coming from right wing groups....it's much more prevalent on left wing blogs.

What tools these Fox people are. I am so sick and tired of their complete and utter bullcrap.

one random rightwinger shooting?

oh that's right, cripple from watching cable news, you didn't know!

i'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but I don't think it is appropriate to post comments from other blogs as representations of anyone's opinion or news. The owner of the blog is stuck between having an open forum, and letting everyone voice their opinion, no matter how whacked it is, or censoring comments, which I think is not right either. I think it is just as unfair when O'Reilly creates stories around inappropriate comments left on progressive blogs, and trying to link progressives to the comments of some whack job, or even some neo-con trying to plant bad comments.

Malkin says enough horrible stuff to highlight without the need to target her commenters.

Bernie Bear @ 76:

Can someone pleeaaase tell me why we have to read tales from the Nut House!

That thing is looks in the mirror and sees Barbie for F5ck sakes and in all sense of the it!!

because the wingnuts like to point at the open comments sections of blogs like c&l to point out that dems and libs are all nutcases

its called "projection"

yes, half of america is fuckin nuts....but it aint our half

and people from malkin's blog werent the only ones to bring this up...its all over the right wing blogs

soon, you will hear it out of the mouths of el druggo and the heinous one

General Jack D. Ripper @ 86:

That damned BillO the Clown tonight was talking again about hate speech on the left wing blogs. Then he showed that nut from Focus on the Family who was praying for rain at Obama's Denver speech. Orally literally was claiming that that FOF video was the "worst" of the right wing; he in effect was saying that there was little to no hate coming from right wing groups....it's much more prevalent on left wing blogs.

What tools these Fox people are. I am so sick and tired of their complete and utter bullcrap.

The capacity for projection by the right is neither finite nor anything new...

General Jack D. Ripper @ 86:

That damned BillO the Clown tonight was talking again about hate speech on the left wing blogs. Then he showed that nut from Focus on the Family who was praying for rain at Obama's Denver speech. Orally literally was claiming that that FOF video was the "worst" of the right wing; he in effect was saying that there was little to no hate coming from right wing groups....it's much more prevalent on left wing blogs.

What tools these Fox people are. I am so sick and tired of their complete and utter bullcrap.

for a full litany of their spewful lies, head over to www.newshounds.us

paranoia @ 87:

one random rightwinger shooting?

oh that's right, cripple from watching cable news, you didn't know!

that makes two hate crimes towards liberals in the past month

think this stuff is isolated? think again

this all comes down to the hate preached on regressive radio

for the past 8 years, we have heard nothing but fear and hate on these shows

i have heard callers refer to obama as the anti christ

the uppity talk keeps coming from the hosts

we need to keep publicizing this stuff, cuz damn if i want america to turn into rwanda 2

and let me tell you who the worst of the bunch are...not the screamers, but the faux intellectuals like praeger, medved and bennett...who spew the exact same talking points and lies...but say it in a much nicer way

NishNish @ 88:

i'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but I don't think it is appropriate to post comments from other blogs as representations of anyone's opinion or news. The owner of the blog is stuck between having an open forum, and letting everyone voice their opinion, no matter how whacked it is, or censoring comments, which I think is not right either. I think it is just as unfair when O'Reilly creates stories around inappropriate comments left on progressive blogs, and trying to link progressives to the comments of some whack job, or even some neo-con trying to plant bad comments.

Malkin says enough horrible stuff to highlight without the need to target her commenters.

Thank you, the concern troll exit is to the left... have a nice day... buh bye now...

Let me explain you the difference:

Oreally et al take a comment that is not offensive, they spin it, take it out of context, and it still fails to be offensive, and Oreally says that it is offensive because.

The right wing comment, it is offensive no matter what the context.

No matter how hard concern trolls try... there is still a big fucking difference between lying and manufacturing reality a la Oreally, and a simple reporting of the sewage that the right wing blogosphere is by relaying the nuggets of shit that they spew on their very own cesspool.

The sad part is that most radio hate speech has been for the past year blaming everything that we are going through on them liberals.

I swear to god they make Goebbels look like an amateour, how they can resape reality with bold faced lies that would be too large to even fathom they could get away with them.

Come November a lot of these morons will vote for McCain because we need to get rid of those liberal bums in the White House.

I think in some parts of this country the give complementary lobotomies with the mandatory baby circumcision, I simply can not explain how some acquittances of mine are literally foaming in the mouth because the liberals have put us in this shithole. The whole part that there has been a Republican majority in the houses for the better part of a decade, that there have been 2 republican administrations, and that the supreme house is tilted towards the conservative side... all of that seem to not register. It is like they can project their own turds and blame it on the liberals. The cognitive dissonance they are capable of, frankly, frightens me!

that's what this is about culture war gone bad. there are peeps on the right that hate the left because they are told they are hated by the left. it's interesting psych/linguistic framing for effective division...two main topics used taxation and religion......i've seen it. if it doesn't stop soon nothing will get down.......and i have to say i believe there are people and organizations that want nothing done. an empowered middle class is a threat.it has been in many cultures over many years. the masses just don't get it.....mccain will put us deeper in a whole.

Conservatism = terrorism. Fact.

Michelle Malkin = Ignorant

Dr. Britney Hussein Matt @ 96:

Conservatism = terrorism. Fact.

It certainly seems that way.
Churches getting shot up b/c the guy thinks the Klannity and O'Retard books are true.
And now, party officials being shot.
I'm sure the jackoffs over at Redstate and Little Green Footballs are all aflutter and busting out champagne.

For Chrissakes, the guy was a CLINTON supporter. How stupid do they think we are?!

Dr. Britney Hussein Matt @ 96:

Conservatism = terrorism. Fact.

Bull. That's the same as saying Islam = terrorism, or Irish independence = terrorism. Such statements are a cop-out. An excuse to marginalize those who do not agree with you by denying the legitimacy and validity of their views.

Besides, this was a murder, and quite likely a political assassination. It wasn't an act of terrorism.

Someone on the internet said something objectionable? Dear me!

Why do we even care? It's a commentator on Malkin's website. Unless I am missing something, you're considering lambasting Malkin for something someone posted in her comments section, which seems obscenely hypocritical...

Tyler Durden @ 93:

NishNish @ 88:

i'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but I don't think it is appropriate to post comments from other blogs as representations of anyone's opinion or news. The owner of the blog is stuck between having an open forum, and letting everyone voice their opinion, no matter how whacked it is, or censoring comments, which I think is not right either. I think it is just as unfair when O'Reilly creates stories around inappropriate comments left on progressive blogs, and trying to link progressives to the comments of some whack job, or even some neo-con trying to plant bad comments.

Malkin says enough horrible stuff to highlight without the need to target her commenters.

Thank you, the concern troll exit is to the left... have a nice day... buh bye now...

Let me explain you the difference:

Oreally et al take a comment that is not offensive, they spin it, take it out of context, and it still fails to be offensive, and Oreally says that it is offensive because.

The right wing comment, it is offensive no matter what the context.

No matter how hard concern trolls try... there is still a big fucking difference between lying and manufacturing reality a la Oreally, and a simple reporting of the sewage that the right wing blogosphere is by relaying the nuggets of shit that they spew on their very own cesspool.

I cannot believe this!

Every day, even here (although the censors are more on the ball than some), I read outrageous statements by random, anonymous schmoes who found their way online. O'Reilly himself has actually quoted some hateful jargon. So what? It should be held against the commentator, not the site owner.

This is the side of liberalism I hate the most: the politically-correct concern trolls who are outraged that something offended their hypersensitive value system.

The comment in question was presented as a cynical hypothetical, not a threat. And even if it were, I'd argue that it should simply be removed and life should go on. Trust me - there are a lot of people online who will say some ridiculous things they'd never say anywhere else, and perhaps even don't believe. They cannot all be stifled.

It's always darkest before the dawn.

Don't be foolish enough to believe there will be no dawn.

Why would Malkin allow this post to stand? She could have moderated the content and removed the post...

The gunman was from Searcy, which is the most right-wing, hardcore Bible-thumping town in the Bible Belt.

The opinions of media goofballs with O'Reilly, Limbaugh,
& many others mean squat. Check out the real news
then form your opinion of the results. Propaganda is
becoming the real news with people like the above &
the goofy Malkin forming the beliefs of Americans on spin
& lies. No wonder W is president.

Udon Nomee @ 100:

Dr. Britney Hussein Matt @ 96:

Conservatism = terrorism. Fact.

Bull. That's the same as saying Islam = terrorism, or Irish independence = terrorism.

No it isn't, at all.

Conservatism = terrorism. Fact.

Malkin.. dumb bitch crazy whore of the loony right...

Andy K Jong Il @ 51:

fderk @ 49:

I think it was a signal to both of them, but I think we should all move away from this kind of talk. It makes me nervous, and now Im nervous about commenting on it. Its a web of nervousness that never ends.


watch Hillary stump for Obama live here

If the gunman sent a message here, it reads something like, "Wolferines ating my brain on the eve of God's return from Lake Athabasca!" I got five bucks on that, even money.

I'll take some of that action!

Oh My @ 2:

You will probably find Fake News, Sean Hannity Lecture in the killer's home

Yep. My thought exactly - just like the creep in Tennessee who shot up the "eeevil librul" church.
When does the rest of America - the ones who say they listen to hate radio 'cause its "funny" wake up and shut off the power, or change the station? This crap is toxic, and malignantly so to the malleable minds out there in black & white simplicityland.

99 M Beyer Says: For Chrissakes, the guy was a CLINTON supporter. How stupid do they think we are?!

He officially changed to Obama either right before or right after the nomination.

The Dallas Morning Nudes often have stories about loony left blogs, and then turn around and print columns with bylines of both jonah goldbooger and (gri)malkin.

Last time they printed the latter I sent a letter (not for publication) and informed them that on the blogs she's called stalkin' malkin, and how either her or her supporters were harrassing a family who's disabled son made commercials for S-Chip. I pointed out that by her comments malkin didn't seem to understand the distinction between Medicare, Medicaid and S-Chip, and their different qualifications and missions.

I even cancelled my subscription for a few months to make my case. Unfortunately, within two weeks after I subscribed to the New York Times, the picked up wee-willy krystolmeth, so I cancelled that subscription and let them know why.

I still paid attention in the interim to the Dallas Morning Nudes online and since I wrote that letter I've seen no (gri)malkin columns.

ysbaddaden @ 110:

99 M Beyer Says: For Chrissakes, the guy was a CLINTON supporter. How stupid do they think we are?!

He officially changed to Obama either right before or right after the nomination.

Both of you people have NO point.

Dr. Britney Hussein Matt @ 96:

Conservatism = terrorism. Fact.

It is ironic, & I always hate to divide anyone into such a dumbed down value as either being on the right or the left, but you don't see a lot of lefties shooting up churches screaming about legalizing pot or equal rights,...

JohnnyThief @ 113:

Dr. Britney Hussein Matt @ 96:

Conservatism = terrorism. Fact.

It is ironic, & I always hate to divide anyone into such a dumbed down value as either being on the right or the left, but you don't see a lot of lefties shooting up churches screaming about legalizing pot or equal rights,...

Or killing someone for world peace.

While the Clintons are highly regarded in the state of Arkansas, I have yet to meet a Clinton supporter that would shoot someone (well, except maybe Ken Starr, but who's to blame them.) The running joke when Bill was running for president was that if we elected him president, we could get him out of the state.

Hillary was more well-received, but like the girl that looks good only after six or seven beers.

Udon Nomee @ 75:

'Hate Speech'!?! Sean Hannity!?! Michelle Malkin!?! Bill O'Reilly!?! Are you kidding me!?! What, are they magicians!?! Do they possess some sort of super-powers!?! Maybe those guys with the tin-foil hats aren't so crazy after all, huh?

So much for, "...but I will defend, to the death, your right to say it.", I guess.

I'm a huge fan of Kieth Olbermann and Thom Hartmann, but if either of them started joking about the shooting of George Wallace in '72, or started discussing hypothetical fantasies about how they "wouldn't shed a tear..." if this or that happened to a conservative, I'd turn them off and be a fan no more. And if I DIDN'T turn them off, then there would d something wrong with ME for listening to it, not them for SAYING it. And if, after hearing some jackass on the radio, you go out and commit crimes of ANY kind as a result, that's on YOU, not the jackass who you think TOLD you to.

You say their verbal diarrhea has no business on the public airwaves, that are intended to inform and serve the public good? I'm with you. You say you wanna boycott their sponsors? Right on! But when you start saying that they share some responsibility for what their listeners do, you're on your own. If you can hear 50 commercials per hour for time-shares and get-rich-quick real estate / stock market / "make a fortune on ebay'" come-ons, without picking up the phone every 10 seconds, then you can't blame anyone for the stupid shit you do but you.

(And don't give me any of that "Well, the genocide in Rwanda..." crap. We're not talking about genocide, and this horrific murder didn't take place in Rwanda.)

Repetitive "hate speech" DOES affect Americans. Hitler turned a whole religious society into fascist advocates of genocide through hate speech not unlike the talk radio haters from the right. Groups of people are being targeted through hateful rhetoric on a daily basis, yet you're telling me these propagandists do not affect their sheep in very negative ways?

Just go try to have a civil debate with a talk radio sheepster. You'll be called everything but a white man. The so-called "conservative" talk radio monopoly has been very destructive to America through daily hateful and divisive rhetoric. You'd have to be blind not to see that. The top 3 drooling microphone suckers: Limbaugh, Hannity, and Weiner have a HUGE audience sucking up this propaganda like the mindless sponges they are.

It's going to get uglier after the election no matter who wins. This country is divided by hate and fascism through the help from these talk radio Nazis.

Tyler Durden @ 93:

NishNish @ 88:

i'm not sure if this has been mentioned, but I don't think it is appropriate to post comments from other blogs as representations of anyone's opinion or news. The owner of the blog is stuck between having an open forum, and letting everyone voice their opinion, no matter how whacked it is, or censoring comments, which I think is not right either. I think it is just as unfair when O'Reilly creates stories around inappropriate comments left on progressive blogs, and trying to link progressives to the comments of some whack job, or even some neo-con trying to plant bad comments.

Malkin says enough horrible stuff to highlight without the need to target her commenters.

Thank you, the concern troll exit is to the left... have a nice day... buh bye now...

Let me explain you the difference:

Oreally et al take a comment that is not offensive, they spin it, take it out of context, and it still fails to be offensive, and Oreally says that it is offensive because.

The right wing comment, it is offensive no matter what the context.

No matter how hard concern trolls try... there is still a big fucking difference between lying and manufacturing reality a la Oreally, and a simple reporting of the sewage that the right wing blogosphere is by relaying the nuggets of shit that they spew on their very own cesspool.

I would like the add the fact that Malkin has the comments on her blog undergo extreme review and edit.

If there's a comment up there, she MEANT it to be there.

It's a great tactic, when you think about it. So people will say the nastiest, most hateful, and insane comments, that works for the NeoCon's best interests. This way they can get these ideas across, and if people are offended, they can just say "Look! it's what other people are saying!"

I don't agree with the method, and I think the NeoCon ideology is disgusting (Pure and simple fascism, hate and greed), but it was a clever tactic... meaning that they're letting other stupid, greedy, misinformed, hateful people speak for them.

JR @ 116:

Udon Nomee @ 75:

'Hate Speech'!?! Sean Hannity!?! Michelle Malkin!?! Bill O'Reilly!?! Are you kidding me!?! What, are they magicians!?! Do they possess some sort of super-powers!?! Maybe those guys with the tin-foil hats aren't so crazy after all, huh?

So much for, "...but I will defend, to the death, your right to say it.", I guess.

I'm a huge fan of Kieth Olbermann and Thom Hartmann, but if either of them started joking about the shooting of George Wallace in '72, or started discussing hypothetical fantasies about how they "wouldn't shed a tear..." if this or that happened to a conservative, I'd turn them off and be a fan no more. And if I DIDN'T turn them off, then there would d something wrong with ME for listening to it, not them for SAYING it. And if, after hearing some jackass on the radio, you go out and commit crimes of ANY kind as a result, that's on YOU, not the jackass who you think TOLD you to.

You say their verbal diarrhea has no business on the public airwaves, that are intended to inform and serve the public good? I'm with you. You say you wanna boycott their sponsors? Right on! But when you start saying that they share some responsibility for what their listeners do, you're on your own. If you can hear 50 commercials per hour for time-shares and get-rich-quick real estate / stock market / "make a fortune on ebay'" come-ons, without picking up the phone every 10 seconds, then you can't blame anyone for the stupid shit you do but you.

(And don't give me any of that "Well, the genocide in Rwanda..." crap. We're not talking about genocide, and this horrific murder didn't take place in Rwanda.)

Repetitive "hate speech" DOES affect Americans. Hitler turned a whole religious society into fascist advocates of genocide through hate speech not unlike the talk radio haters from the right. Groups of people are being targeted through hateful rhetoric on a daily basis, yet you're telling me these propagandists do not affect their sheep in very negative ways?

Just go try to have a civil debate with a talk radio sheepster. You'll be called everything but a white man. The so-called "conservative" talk radio monopoly has been very destructive to America through daily hateful and divisive rhetoric. You'd have to be blind not to see that. The top 3 drooling microphone suckers: Limbaugh, Hannity, and Weiner have a HUGE audience sucking up this propaganda like the mindless sponges they are.

It's going to get uglier after the election no matter who wins. This country is divided by hate and fascism through the help from these talk radio Nazis.

Let's not forget the fact that virtually all the people making hate speech on the air have supported, and even actively tried to goad people in committing illegal acts such as murder, lynching and more.

It's as if the NeoCon pundits seem to forget that their comments are being recorded.

My GOD these people are I N S A N E. And why have we not shown up in the millions to stop this horror? because we are lazy cowards, that's why.

I wondered how long it would be before somebody blamed the Clintons.

Malkin has to be one of the top stupidest and ugliest Reslug whores out there.

Numinous @ 118:

JR @ 116:

Udon Nomee @ 75:

'Hate Speech'!?! Sean Hannity!?! Michelle Malkin!?! Bill O'Reilly!?! Are you kidding me!?! What, are they magicians!?! Do they possess some sort of super-powers!?! Maybe those guys with the tin-foil hats aren't so crazy after all, huh?

So much for, "...but I will defend, to the death, your right to say it.", I guess.

I'm a huge fan of Kieth Olbermann and Thom Hartmann, but if either of them started joking about the shooting of George Wallace in '72, or started discussing hypothetical fantasies about how they "wouldn't shed a tear..." if this or that happened to a conservative, I'd turn them off and be a fan no more. And if I DIDN'T turn them off, then there would d something wrong with ME for listening to it, not them for SAYING it. And if, after hearing some jackass on the radio, you go out and commit crimes of ANY kind as a result, that's on YOU, not the jackass who you think TOLD you to.

You say their verbal diarrhea has no business on the public airwaves, that are intended to inform and serve the public good? I'm with you. You say you wanna boycott their sponsors? Right on! But when you start saying that they share some responsibility for what their listeners do, you're on your own. If you can hear 50 commercials per hour for time-shares and get-rich-quick real estate / stock market / "make a fortune on ebay'" come-ons, without picking up the phone every 10 seconds, then you can't blame anyone for the stupid shit you do but you.

(And don't give me any of that "Well, the genocide in Rwanda..." crap. We're not talking about genocide, and this horrific murder didn't take place in Rwanda.)

Repetitive "hate speech" DOES affect Americans. Hitler turned a whole religious society into fascist advocates of genocide through hate speech not unlike the talk radio haters from the right. Groups of people are being targeted through hateful rhetoric on a daily basis, yet you're telling me these propagandists do not affect their sheep in very negative ways?

Just go try to have a civil debate with a talk radio sheepster. You'll be called everything but a white man. The so-called "conservative" talk radio monopoly has been very destructive to America through daily hateful and divisive rhetoric. You'd have to be blind not to see that. The top 3 drooling microphone suckers: Limbaugh, Hannity, and Weiner have a HUGE audience sucking up this propaganda like the mindless sponges they are.

It's going to get uglier after the election no matter who wins. This country is divided by hate and fascism through the help from these talk radio Nazis.

Let's not forget the fact that virtually all the people making hate speech on the air have supported, and even actively tried to goad people in committing illegal acts such as murder, lynching and more.

It's as if the NeoCon pundits seem to forget that their comments are being recorded.

Inciting to riot or violence IS illegal is it not?
That's exactly what these fascist propagandists are doin.
It's being recorded, noted, and will (hopefully) one day be used against them in a court of law.

Rusty The One Shackleford @ 120:

I wondered how long it would be before somebody blamed the Clintons.

LOL!
It was only a matter of time really....

liberalNmoderation @ 123:

Rusty The One Shackleford @ 120:

I wondered how long it would be before somebody blamed the Clintons.

LOL!
It was only a matter of time really....

And it will be only the Right and the puppet heads on the Right that will say it. It's like the whole Obama-Messiah meme... I haven't heard on liberal or progressive describe Obama as a Messiah or Savior, just the pudding heads on the right.

Simon White-Thatch Potentloins @ 103:

It's always darkest before the dawn.

Don't be foolish enough to believe there will be no dawn.

Unfortunately, we have to get rid of our own DINO's first.

But I do agree, its just going to take that much longer.

Eventually people will realize THEY don't have to put up with this shit anymore. All they have to do, is quit voting for the scumbags with an "R" next to their name.

Scy @ 119:

My GOD these people are I N S A N E. And why have we not shown up in the millions to stop this horror? because we are lazy cowards, that's why.

No, I don't think so. It just hasn't boiled over to the point of armed conflict yet.

Instead of North vs. South over slavery, it will be liberators (liberals) vs. fascists (conservatives) over democracy. This one won't take very long however, as the mouthpiece cowards like Limbaugh, Kristol, O'rally, Cheney and their slimy ilk will load their private jets with cash and head for Dubai.

Then, their moron followers will quickly surrender, since they are only capable of shooting unarmed people in churches and offices.

This is just the type of insanity that Rush,Hannity,Boortz, Malkin, Weiner et al promote, from their right-wing shows!

There is one thing for sure and you can take it to the bank, McCain isn't Malkins father, as he was in a POW at the time of Malkins birth but tens of thousands of Marines, Sailors, Airmen and Soldiers passed through Subic Bay, had liberty, at the time Malkins mother got pregnant!

Yes, this is a murder committed by one of the right-wing loonies who listened to the hate-filled talk radio shows, like Rush's (among others). They spew this hate and promote violence. We'll probably see more and more of these things happening. We live in a hate-filled country, thanks to the Repuglicans.

NoGWBpolicyleftinplace @ 126:

Scy @ 119:

My GOD these people are I N S A N E. And why have we not shown up in the millions to stop this horror? because we are lazy cowards, that's why.

No, I don't think so. It just hasn't boiled over to the point of armed conflict yet.

Instead of North vs. South over slavery, it will be liberators (liberals) vs. fascists (conservatives) over democracy. This one won't take very long however, as the mouthpiece cowards like Limbaugh, Kristol, O'rally, Cheney and their slimy ilk will load their private jets with cash and head for Dubai.

Then, their moron followers will quickly surrender, since they are only capable of shooting unarmed people in churches and offices.

Yeah...it'll go down somethin like that...

Pretty obvious the guy was a nutsoid PUMA pissed that Gwatney had changed his support from Hillary to Obama.

liberalNmoderation @ 130:

NoGWBpolicyleftinplace @ 126:

Scy @ 119:

My GOD these people are I N S A N E. And why have we not shown up in the millions to stop this horror? because we are lazy cowards, that's why.

No, I don't think so. It just hasn't boiled over to the point of armed conflict yet.

Instead of North vs. South over slavery, it will be liberators (liberals) vs. fascists (conservatives) over democracy. This one won't take very long however, as the mouthpiece cowards like Limbaugh, Kristol, O'rally, Cheney and their slimy ilk will load their private jets with cash and head for Dubai.

Then, their moron followers will quickly surrender, since they are only capable of shooting unarmed people in churches and offices.

Yeah...it'll go down somethin like that...

Though I know personally, some right wingers who ain't cowards, and would put up a hell of a fight if this does happen...they're damn good shots too...
While I am preparing for such a conflict...I hope it doesn't come to that...I'd much rather see this solved through non-violent means....though, they may bot give us a choice.

Buck Mulligan @ 131:

Pretty obvious the guy was a nutsoid PUMA pissed that Gwatney had changed his support from Hillary to Obama.

I dunno...I think the was just a nutso...I don't think he was politically motivated so much, as just a fuckin crazy asshole with a gun.

Jeon Ji-Yung @ 7:

And this is yet another reason why Hillary Clinton is a bad choice for VP. She's a freaking psycho magnet. People who hate Obama for being black hate Hillary Clinton more for being Hillary Clinton.

Gee another nut who blames Hillary Clinton for everything to a dry spell to a wet spell. Gee gee gee...these are the types of people who supported obama NUTS NUTS NUTS. if they believe Hilllary is responsible for this.

The damn guy lost his job because of the republican actions and blamed the democrats. Which is always the republican way. It is a simple as that.

I have no idea who Michelle Malkin is, but she's obviously a hate-fueled idiot
who's not even worth paying attention to.. I sure hope that nobody ever gives
her a beatdown with a pillowcase full of doorknobs - regardless of whether
she deserves it or not.

Michelle Malkin is a friggin moron. But.. it's always funny watching a moron's thought process.
It could have worked this way..

Arkansas is to Clinton as Democratic Party Chairman is to Obama and Gun equals Message. Sherlock Malkin she's not.

JR @ 116:

Repetitive "hate speech" DOES affect Americans. Hitler turned a whole religious society into fascist advocates of genocide through hate speech not unlike the talk radio haters from the right...

Pullleeez! Hitler did not control a nation with a crappy radio program, wacky right-wing nutjob racist hate-mongers were on the air spewing their bs long before Hannity and O'Reilly, and this is not Germany in the late 1920's. To draw such a parallel is absolutely absurd.

To my knowledge, none of these right-wing radio jackasses were on the air telling listeners to go out and murder high ranking officials of the opposition party. If you think that they are somehow responsible for one of their listeners committing this heinous act, please enlighten me to how you account for the rest of their listeners who didn't murder anyone!?!

I don't think their crap is an appropriate use of the public airwaves, but if they want to put their nonsense on satellite radio, and if anyone is stupid enough to want to pay to hear it, I think they have a right to do so that is guaranteed under the Constitution. For me, it's not their message, but the method of delivery that I object to. I will not fear their backward, misguided ideas, I will expose them for the useless, self-serving and deceptive lies that they are.

You can't legislate intelligence and common sense, and you can't stop bad ideas by trying to stifle them.

In my opinion, anyone who could do something like this was going to find SOME issue, sooner or later, that they could use as an excuse to act out their sick fantasies of being a big badass with the power to effect change, and thereby, hopefully, erase the shame of having such a small penis. Right-wing bs is just the excuse they found, this time.

(BTW, the 'small penis' reference is intended as a metaphor for any unresolved inadequacy issues... as well diminutive genitalia, as the case may be.)

Udon Nomee @ 137:

JR @ 116:

Repetitive "hate speech" DOES affect Americans. Hitler turned a whole religious society into fascist advocates of genocide through hate speech not unlike the talk radio haters from the right...

Pullleeez! Hitler did not control a nation with a crappy radio program, wacky right-wing nutjob racist hate-mongers were on the air spewing their bs long before Hannity and O'Reilly, and this is not Germany in the late 1920's. To draw such a parallel is absolutely absurd.

To my knowledge, none of these right-wing radio jackasses were on the air telling listeners to go out and murder high ranking officials of the opposition party. If you think that they are somehow responsible for one of their listeners committing this heinous act, please enlighten me to how you account for the rest of their listeners who didn't murder anyone!?!

I don't think their crap is an appropriate use of the public airwaves, but if they want to put their nonsense on satellite radio, and if anyone is stupid enough to want to pay to hear it, I think they have a right to do so that is guaranteed under the Constitution. For me, it's not their message, but the method of delivery that I object to. I will not fear their backward, misguided ideas, I will expose them for the useless, self-serving and deceptive lies that they are.

You can't legislate intelligence and common sense, and you can't stop bad ideas by trying to stifle them.

In my opinion, anyone who could do something like this was going to find SOME issue, sooner or later, that they could use as an excuse to act out their sick fantasies of being a big badass with the power to effect change, and thereby, hopefully, erase the shame of having such a small penis. Right-wing bs is just the excuse they found, this time.

(BTW, the 'small penis' reference is intended as a metaphor for any unresolved inadequacy issues... as well diminutive genitalia, as the case may be.)

Dude...they have, and are continuing to call for deadly violence against leftist, liberals, atheists, anyone who thinks or lives differently than they do.
That's fuckin illegal.
I'm all for free speech, very much so...
But these fascist fucks cross the line daily.
Incitement to violence is a crime.

Come on, guys- the Clintons had to kill this guy who no one ever heard of. After Obama killed Bernie Mac, the Clintons had to respond, before he got any closer to them on his list of murders. All liberals go around killing anyone they get close to. Didn't you know that? Oh, except for John Kerry who, being a real war hero, is obviously muich too cowardly to kill anyone. My God, have you ever seen the list of people that Gandhi killed with his own hands? Jerome Corsi will have a book out about that any time now.

Green Eagle @ 139:

Come on, guys- the Clintons had to kill this guy who no one ever heard of. After Obama killed Bernie Mac, the Clintons had to respond, before he got any closer to them on his list of murders. All liberals go around killing anyone they get close to. Didn't you know that? Oh, except for John Kerry who, being a real war hero, is obviously muich too cowardly to kill anyone. My God, have you ever seen the list of people that Gandhi killed with his own hands? Jerome Corsi will have a book out about that any time now.

Yeah, that Gandhi was a bloodthirsty SOB, lol!

Who gives a shit what Malkin supporter posted online?

I understand that a few right wing hosts like to highlight what people say on the Huffington Post and whatnot, but don't stoop to their level.

Yes, please don't stoop to their level. It degrades all of us when you do.

Tom Piltoff @ 141:

Who gives a shit what Malkin supporter posted online?

I understand that a few right wing hosts like to highlight what people say on the Huffington Post and whatnot, but don't stoop to their level.

liberalNmoderation @ 138:

Dude...they have, and are continuing to call for deadly violence against leftist, liberals, atheists, anyone who thinks or lives differently than they do.
That's fuckin illegal.
I'm all for free speech, very much so...
But these fascist fucks cross the line daily.
Incitement to violence is a crime.

Please, show me or tell me where I can find the broadcast of one of them telling, asking, suggesting or otherwise inspiring listeners to go out and murder the Chairman of the Democratic Party in their state. I am not being sarcastic here. If it happened, I'd like to know.

And I'm not saying that they DON'T incite people to break the law, either. Punkin' Head Limbaugh most certainly DID break the law by asking listeners to participate in his "Operation Chaos", regardless of it's effect on the electoral process. And certainly, there are plenty of other examples, as well.

What I AM saying is that, in this instance, to suggest that they are somehow responsible for a listener committing this murder is ridiculous. This time, the only one responsible is the guy who decided to solve his problem with a gun.

liberalNmoderation @ 133:

Buck Mulligan @ 131:

Pretty obvious the guy was a nutsoid PUMA pissed that Gwatney had changed his support from Hillary to Obama.

I dunno...I think the was just a nutso...I don't think he was politically motivated so much, as just a fuckin crazy asshole with a gun.

Doesn’t mean he WASN’T a PUMA. Ya don’t go to democratic headquarters after you lose your job at Target to discuss what’s on your mind.

Obama's probably going to win the election, unless he or one of his staff fuck up royally. Then there'll be a short interlude while he attempts to right some of the horrible wrongs that Bush inflicted on America, our reputation, and our constitutional rights. Then there;ll be some sort of secret meeting of the far-right industrialist wackos who really run the country, and they'll begin looking for some ignorant drunken redneck who they can fool into killing him, thinking he'll get away with it. Of course, he won't...and won't be around to testify either.
These dirtbags are certainly not going to tolerate Obama in the White House, reducing their profits and trying to get them to clean up the environment.

drewcifer @ 142:

Yes, please don't stoop to their level. It degrades all of us when you do.

Tom Piltoff @ 141:

Who gives a shit what Malkin supporter posted online?

I understand that a few right wing hosts like to highlight what people say on the Huffington Post and whatnot, but don't stoop to their level.

Newsflash; there have been already a couple killings by these idiots. So it is quite pertinent to display the madness written in their fecal boards.

Liberals don't got around shooting conservatives, so displaying their madness is not stooping at their level. It is not in the same league, it is not even remotely related to the same sport.

No wonder liberals are an extinct species in this country. Some of you are way too concerned about taking the higher road at any given chance, even when it is not even in the context, than defending your own interests.

So keep it with the "who cares" 3 decades of that had made you fools almost irrelevant.

Udon Nomee @ 137:

JR @ 116:

Repetitive "hate speech" DOES affect Americans. Hitler turned a whole religious society into fascist advocates of genocide through hate speech not unlike the talk radio haters from the right...

Pullleeez! Hitler did not control a nation with a crappy radio program, wacky right-wing nutjob racist hate-mongers were on the air spewing their bs long before Hannity and O'Reilly, and this is not Germany in the late 1920's. To draw such a parallel is absolutely absurd.

To my knowledge, none of these right-wing radio jackasses were on the air telling listeners to go out and murder high ranking officials of the opposition party. If you think that they are somehow responsible for one of their listeners committing this heinous act, please enlighten me to how you account for the rest of their listeners who didn't murder anyone!?!

I don't think their crap is an appropriate use of the public airwaves, but if they want to put their nonsense on satellite radio, and if anyone is stupid enough to want to pay to hear it, I think they have a right to do so that is guaranteed under the Constitution. For me, it's not their message, but the method of delivery that I object to. I will not fear their backward, misguided ideas, I will expose them for the useless, self-serving and deceptive lies that they are.

You can't legislate intelligence and common sense, and you can't stop bad ideas by trying to stifle them.

In my opinion, anyone who could do something like this was going to find SOME issue, sooner or later, that they could use as an excuse to act out their sick fantasies of being a big badass with the power to effect change, and thereby, hopefully, erase the shame of having such a small penis. Right-wing bs is just the excuse they found, this time.

(BTW, the 'small penis' reference is intended as a metaphor for any unresolved inadequacy issues... as well diminutive genitalia, as the case may be.)

Yeah, these are innocent comments:

Rush Limbaugh: "I tell people don't kill all the liberals. Leave enough so we can have two on every campus – living fossils – so we will never forget what these people stood for."

Senator Phil Gramm: "We're going to keep building the party until we're hunting Democrats with dogs."

Rep. James Hansen: "Get rid of the guy (Clinton). Impreach him, censure him, assassinate him."

John Derbyshire: wrote in the National Review that because Chelsea Clinton had "the taint," she should "be killed."

Ann Coulter: "We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too."

Ann Coulter: "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building."

Bill O'Reilly: "Those clowns over at the liberal radio network, we could incarcerate them immediately. Will you have that done, please? Send over the FBI and just put them in chains."

Glenn Beck: "I'm thinking about killing Michael Moore" and pondered whether "I could kill him myself, or if I would need to hire somebody to do it," before concluding: "No, I think I could. I think he could be looking me in the eye, you know, and I could just be choking the life out -- is this wrong?"

Mel Gibson on Frank Rich: "I want to kill him. I want his entrails on a stick. I want to kill his dog."

Fresno City Council Member Jerry Duncan: "If I had one dirty bomb and I could eliminate all the liberals in Fresno at once."

But I am sure concern trolls will tell me those were "innocent" and "silly" comments. Right...

I can't decide if some of you are just plain fools, pussies, or simple conservative plants.

Buck Mulligan @ 144:

liberalNmoderation @ 133:

Buck Mulligan @ 131:

Pretty obvious the guy was a nutsoid PUMA pissed that Gwatney had changed his support from Hillary to Obama.

I dunno...I think the was just a nutso...I don't think he was politically motivated so much, as just a fuckin crazy asshole with a gun.

Doesn’t mean he WASN’T a PUMA. Ya don’t go to democratic headquarters after you lose your job at Target to discuss what’s on your mind.

If he was a PUMA, then it WOULD have been political...
If you're a psycho, you do.

Tyler Durden @ 147:

Udon Nomee @ 137:

JR @ 116:

Repetitive "hate speech" DOES affect Americans. Hitler turned a whole religious society into fascist advocates of genocide through hate speech not unlike the talk radio haters from the right...

Pullleeez! Hitler did not control a nation with a crappy radio program, wacky right-wing nutjob racist hate-mongers were on the air spewing their bs long before Hannity and O'Reilly, and this is not Germany in the late 1920's. To draw such a parallel is absolutely absurd.

To my knowledge, none of these right-wing radio jackasses were on the air telling listeners to go out and murder high ranking officials of the opposition party. If you think that they are somehow responsible for one of their listeners committing this heinous act, please enlighten me to how you account for the rest of their listeners who didn't murder anyone!?!

I don't think their crap is an appropriate use of the public airwaves, but if they want to put their nonsense on satellite radio, and if anyone is stupid enough to want to pay to hear it, I think they have a right to do so that is guaranteed under the Constitution. For me, it's not their message, but the method of delivery that I object to. I will not fear their backward, misguided ideas, I will expose them for the useless, self-serving and deceptive lies that they are.

You can't legislate intelligence and common sense, and you can't stop bad ideas by trying to stifle them.

In my opinion, anyone who could do something like this was going to find SOME issue, sooner or later, that they could use as an excuse to act out their sick fantasies of being a big badass with the power to effect change, and thereby, hopefully, erase the shame of having such a small penis. Right-wing bs is just the excuse they found, this time.

(BTW, the 'small penis' reference is intended as a metaphor for any unresolved inadequacy issues... as well diminutive genitalia, as the case may be.)

Yeah, these are innocent comments:

Rush Limbaugh: "I tell people don't kill all the liberals. Leave enough so we can have two on every campus – living fossils – so we will never forget what these people stood for."

Senator Phil Gramm: "We're going to keep building the party until we're hunting Democrats with dogs."

Rep. James Hansen: "Get rid of the guy (Clinton). Impreach him, censure him, assassinate him."

John Derbyshire: wrote in the National Review that because Chelsea Clinton had "the taint," she should "be killed."

Ann Coulter: "We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too."

Ann Coulter: "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building."

Bill O'Reilly: "Those clowns over at the liberal radio network, we could incarcerate them immediately. Will you have that done, please? Send over the FBI and just put them in chains."

Glenn Beck: "I'm thinking about killing Michael Moore" and pondered whether "I could kill him myself, or if I would need to hire somebody to do it," before concluding: "No, I think I could. I think he could be looking me in the eye, you know, and I could just be choking the life out -- is this wrong?"

Mel Gibson on Frank Rich: "I want to kill him. I want his entrails on a stick. I want to kill his dog."

Fresno City Council Member Jerry Duncan: "If I had one dirty bomb and I could eliminate all the liberals in Fresno at once."

But I am sure concern trolls will tell me those were "innocent" and "silly" comments. Right...

I can't decide if some of you are just plain fools, pussies, or simple conservative plants.

Excellent post....and holy shit...glenn beck actually said that? If I were Michael Moore, I'd have beck arrested and charge with communicating a threat. Or somethin like that...
And Mel Gibson...total lunatic. Wow.

While I'm aware that currently that linking this guy to hate radio is just a speculation -- one based on the fact the guy went out of his way to gun down the State DNC Head would infer it was politically motivated and likely the result of some right wing whackjob who was fed the line about liberals being totalitarian oppressors for years -- the speculation that brings Hillary into this in any way is utterly absurd, libelous, and just immature.

Where does she even factor into the equation?

166 comments

Login or Register to post comments.