I pledge allegiance to the money of the United Corporations of America, and to the billionaires for which I stand, our nation, divided, with no taxes or oversight for the 1% that run the country.

...are just upset because they didn't think of it first. And so now they have to twist their already knotted rationale for existence into an even more tangled "sheepshank" so that they can be opposed to the OWS protests.

These people, their immaturity, and their hypocrisy sicken me.

Teabaggers are so clueless, that they would buy tickets to their own torture and execution - and demand to pay top dollar to the oligarch's for the privelege.

You can't fix stupid.

one of the great, defining rants of the tea partiers, "we want our country back!". when asked who took it, after much dissembling, it boiled down to that black man in the white house, and all those minorities of other than white hues. but, the tea party wasn't racist! don't you dare accuse them of being racist!, even though much about them, their complaints, their signs, their leadership was, in fact, racist. oh, and they were darned if obama was going to take their guns, which many brought with them to rallies, democratic politician's townhall meetings, etc., to "exercise" their second amendment rights, as though it was a dog in need of walking, but with dum-dum bullets. that pres. obama has made no effort whatever to exert any greater control over gun ownership means nothing, because, you know, it's all a conspiracy.

strange that she would leave all that out, which actually defines the tea party movement (along with all the grifters (see: palin, sarah) said movement has attracted.

Fuck the teaparty! Yeah, the OWS protesters are, to your average teabagger (and aren't all teabaggers at best, average when you think about it) dirty fucking hippies. But if and when serious political change comes about from the sacrifices made by our brothers and sisters on the streets of NY, San Francisco, Chicago, Philly, and a whole list of other towns and cities, you know the teabaggers will crawl out of the woodwork and be the first in line to take advantage of the changes. Fucking useless, hypocritical Kochsuckers, the entire bunch.

They should be with us at this moment in time, screaming for income and economic equality, but we're the enemy. Rush Limbaugh, Billo, Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck say so.

This is one place where the right has come off with near perfection. They have trained people to have Pavlovian responses to buzz words and phrases. Even to the point of changing their views on things depending on who is in power. Who else would have an emotional response to the word teleprompter?
The edict is barked and the Pavlovian response is achieved. They have rounded up every shallow thinker in the country and made them feel smart.

all sick Bigots brought to you by the extreme hate of Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Billo, Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck, etc. etc.
They thrive on Hate. They believe in Hate. They promote, incite, praise and encourage Hate. Very dangerous indeed, as we are seeing, to a civil society.

"Two Moral Fram­ing Sys­tems in Pol­i­tics

Con­ser­v­a­tives have fig­ured out their moral basis and you see it on Wall Street: It in­cludes: The pri­macy of self-in­ter­est. In­di­vid­ual re­spon­si­bil­ity, but not so­cial re­spon­si­bil­ity. Hi­er­ar­chi­cal au­thor­ity based on wealth or other forms of power. A moral hi­er­ar­chy of who is “de­serv­ing,” de­fined by suc­cess. And the high­est prin­ci­ple is the pri­macy of this moral sys­tem it­self, which goes be­yond Wall Street and the econ­omy to other are­nas: fam­ily life, so­cial life, re­li­gion, for­eign pol­icy, and es­pe­cially gov­ern­ment. Con­ser­v­a­tive “democ­racy” is seen as a sys­tem of gov­er­nance and elec­tions that fits this model.
The al­ter­na­tive view of democ­racy is pro­gres­sive: Democ­racy starts with cit­i­zens car­ing about one an­other and act­ing re­spon­si­bly on that sense of care, tak­ing re­spon­si­bil­ity both for one­self and for one’s fam­ily, com­mu­nity, coun­try, peo­ple in gen­eral, and the planet. The role of gov­ern­ment is to pro­tect and em­power all cit­i­zens equally via The Pub­lic: pub­lic in­fra­struc­ture, laws and en­force­ment, health, ed­u­ca­tion, sci­en­tific re­search, pro­tec­tion, pub­lic lands, trans­porta­tion, re­sources, art and cul­ture, trade poli­cies, safety nets, and on and on. No­body makes it one their own. If you got wealthy, you de­pended on The Pub­lic, and you have a re­spon­si­bil­ity to con­tribute sig­nif­i­cantly to The Pub­lic so that oth­ers can ben­e­fit in the fu­ture. More­over, the wealthy de­pend on those who work, and who de­serve a fair re­turn for their con­tri­bu­tion to our na­tional life. Cor­po­ra­tions exist to make life bet­ter for most peo­ple. Their rea­son for ex­ist­ing is as pub­lic as it is pri­vate."
http://www.nationofchange.org/framing-memo-oc...

From what I've been seeing and hearing over the past month, as well as the past few years, when someone on the right protests for something they believe in, they're "Patriotic Americans"; but when decent, honorable progressives protest an injustice - usually caused by the so-called "Patriotic Americans", those people are vilified and singled out as something to get rid of.

Some recent examples of this can be found in the right's reaction to the Occupy protests across the country and around the world. "Lonesome Rhodes" Beck has suggested that, in regard to the protesters, there should be a "Night of the Long Knives"-style purging of this country. Guess who he wants to purge?

Likewise, this past September, before the protests began, Andrew Breitbart has basically said of us, "They know that they can only win a rhetorical or propaganda war", followed by this little gem: "We outnumber them, and we have the guns". Guess who he wants to come after in a fight?

So, how do we know that Beck and Breitbart, as well as some in power, such as that punk Eric Cantor, and that insipid evil Allen West, who told his followers to make his opponent in his election campaign "afraid to leave the house", will not try to - even personally - lead these teabaggers right to the scene of the protests and start their little war, even opening fire on people such as us?

Let us now kid ourselves, their followers are not rational, they will not listen to reason, and does anyone recall one of the protest signs from the right, which read, "We came unarmed, this time"? How do we know that they're not itching to start the fight?

We had better be ready for them, should they try anything, that's all I can say.

'stargazzn' is a lying right wing puke!

Read his comments and you see he's a lying SOB.

Besides common sense says he lies and so does the link below .

"Attention Conservatives Trying to Play Guilt-by-Association with Occupy Wall Street: Bring It On

I see the wingnuts are running around trying to tie the Occupy Wall Street movement with Nazis and Communists."

http://firedoglake.com/2011/10/16/attention-c...