I guess it's a speaker from the Citizens of Liberty or something...Another Global Warming denier. I couldn't write any dialogue for you from this clip. That's really asking way too much of me. Maybe she'll run for president too.
Syria's Crackdown on Protesters Escalates
Karen Handel: Komen Was Trying To Move To Neutral Ground Until Politics Took Hold
'60 Minutes' exposes the 'sovereign citizens' as the nation's most serious domestic-terrorism threat
Fox News Launches Campaign To Fire UN Ambassador Susan Rice
Glenn Beck: Art Critic |
Ellen Responds to Anti-LGBT Group: 'My Haters Are My Motivators' |
| Plays: 581 Downloads: 35 | |
|
Fox News Launches Campaign To Fire UN Ambassador Susan Rice |
| Plays: 218 Downloads: 20 | |
|
'60 Minutes' exposes the 'sovereign citizens' as the nation's most serious domestic-terrorism threat |
| Plays: 228 Downloads: 9 | |
 |
Lawrence O'Donnell: The Single-Payer Solution |
| Plays: 118 Downloads: 22 | |
 |
Santorum's Victory Speech: Popular President Not Listening, Deplored GOP Candidates All Ears |
| Plays: 28 Downloads: 91 |
|
Ellen Responds to Anti-LGBT Group: 'My Haters Are My Motivators' |
| Plays: 3166 Downloads: 136 | |
 |
Jon Stewart Knocks Romney For Saying He's 'Not Concerned About the Very Poor' |
| Plays: 2931 Downloads: 149 | |
 |
Alan Grayson's Opponent's Creepy Slave Ship Ad |
| Plays: 2688 Downloads: 75 | |
 |
YouTube Yanks Clint Eastwood Chrysler Ad After NFL Copyright Claim |
| Plays: 2324 Downloads: 145 | |
 |
Michael Steele Loves States' Rights Argument Against Gays, But Not Against Blacks |
| Plays: 1936 Downloads: 82 |
 |
SNL: GOP 2012 Undeclared Candidates Debate |
| Plays: 9651 Downloads: 437 | |
 |
Jon Stewart Explains What Happened to Rick Perry During His Bizarre Speech in New Hampshire |
| Plays: 8807 Downloads: 246 | |
 |
Keith Olbermann and Janeane Garofalo Weigh in on the 'Tea Party' and the Bachmanns |
| Plays: 4808 Downloads: 209 | |
 |
Jon Stewart Knocks Mitt Romney For His Private Sector Job Credentials at Bain |
| Plays: 4441 Downloads: 236 | |
 |
Keith Olbermann Returns to the Air and Gives His First Special Comment |
| Plays: 3967 Downloads: 230 |
Aaaah...one of the few upsloping stats in the USA...the IDIOT INDEX.
"Anyone that makes less than $150K in this country, has no business voting Republican."
Exactly! I saw a book promoted on The Daily Show (or Colbert? Rachel?): Idiot America: How Stupidity Became a Virtue in the Land of the Free, by Charles P. Pierce, and bought it -- I highly recommend it. It discusses attitudes like this speaker's, of people proud of their ignorance.
And this woman's voice ... my god ... at least Sarah Palin's voice is clear in tone. This woman sounds like fingernails on the blackboard.
Only dumber.
in a room filled only with CO2. I suspect it wouldn't make her any more stupid.
Stupid is as stupid does!
.
Game Show Material...
... Instead of Cap-n-Trade it could be
Bag-n-Save.
Bag, as in...
... Put a plastic bag over your head for 24 hours and breath that essential to life CO2 that you omit and SAVE me the trouble of listening to you carry on about it.
IF, after 24 hours, you have something to contribute, then I'll be willing to listen...
... But no cheating.
.
Starve the WAR Beast...
... Feed Americans.
I burned a tire in the backyard in support.
I've been spraying aerosols 'cause it's cool
Is that Emily Littella speaking?
I was waiting for Chevy Chase to show up and explain it to her. Towhich she would say "Never mind!"
(LOL) Yeah, Emily Litella times two! Can you imagine her screeching during sex? Her husband probably has irreparable hearing loss.
Greeeat. Thanks, Kate. I REALLY needed THAT image.
"Anyone that makes less than $150K in this country, has no business voting Republican."
Her voice is still echoing in my mind.
OK, now I'm confused -- was it Emily Litella or Roseanne Rosanna Danna who had the screechy voice and would say, "It's always something" and "Oh. Never mind." ?
Litella: Oh, Never Mind.
Rosannadanna: It's always something.
2 separate characters and sayings.
So it was Litella who had the screechy voice, then?
About halfway through I started envisioning Cheri Oteri giving the speech word for word - would be a hysterical SNL skit
I DO believe that you are dumb enough to believe anything.
Firstly, the atmosphere was likely different in the time of the dinos (not conducive to human life), even then, no one was farming and concentrating cows. Again having to hear about the entirely fictional and ridiculous cow flatulence meters...
And about the whole "CO2 is natural, therefore AWESOME"; Water is also natural, and awesome. Until it rises up to the level of your roof. Then you've got too much.
as a nurse and CO2 is natural, but you can certainly have too much,
perhaps that's her problem. Too much CO2 in the body does tend to fog the brain.
Water is awesome until you get too much of it in your lungs. Then it's very, very bad.
almost. I was going with water is essential for life, but drink too much, too fast and it is toxic.
I pledge allegiance to the Constitution of the United States of America, and to the republic which it established, one nation from many peoples, promising liberty and justice for all
Perhaps the astronauts on apollo 13 should have not worried about building a makeshift 'scrubber' to remove the Co2 from their air while they were stranded in a dead spaceship. That would have been awesome too! Obviously, they didn't appreciate the awesomeness of our favourite toxins.
Look, I can read a piece of paper in front of me with these 1st grade level sciency facts! That makes global warming fake...
Never mind that EVERY professional scientist that has looked into the issue states, without qualification, that global warming is real and is a severe threat. THAT doesn't matter... as long as I can read my little fact sheet and be really really adamant about reading it.
OMG - shrill and really stupid - literally hurt my ears. Suck on that natural carbon dee oxide baby!
She makes Mary Murphy of So You Think You Can Dance seem low key by comparison.She has the kind of voice that causes people to throw epileptic fits.That makes your teeth hurt.That melts earwax.
"To me, truth is not some vague, foggy notion. Truth is real. And,
at the same time, unreal. Fiction and fact and everything in between,
plus some things I can't remember, all rolled into one big "thing."
This is truth, to me. "
-Jack Handy
That made my dog get up and leave the room.
The kinda funny thing is I didn't check my speakers before I clicked on the video and sadly they were up at full force. Her voice and the loudness about killed me and my dog before I could hit the button to turn them down.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
"That made my dog get up and leave the room."
who can blame him?
"To me, truth is not some vague, foggy notion. Truth is real. And,
at the same time, unreal. Fiction and fact and everything in between,
plus some things I can't remember, all rolled into one big "thing."
This is truth, to me. "
-Jack Handy
My cat fainted.
If CO2 is so good, we should convert her into it.
Well she is a pretty big gas bag.
Perhaps this mental midget will want to take note of that. Look what happened to it.
"We will find fulfillment not in the goods that we have, but in the good we can do for each other."
Robert F. Kennedy
To avoid going into an entire rant about why she is wrong (everyone here knows why anyways) and wasting letters on this idiot. I'm going to just point to this as a very good case for education reform.
Well, that was painful on so many different levels. Did she say the empire's clothing? Maybe it was just her accent or decibel of her voice that made it sound that way.
She got real classy when speaking of what her family does at holiday celebrations.
This is the kind of woman that could indeed drive any human being insane within minutes.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
then these have to be the happiest people on earth. maybe in the universe.
Yes indeed, based on that theory, this woman is freakin' happy.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
Now I know why one shouldn't tea bag. Look what it does to your voice and your mind.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
was evident. 'Nuff said.
Another idiot repuglican basking in her own ignorance....
By the way, John.
How on earth do you find such things?
Carbon Deeoxide
She hasn't heard the word enough to know how to pronounce it so that tells us a lot.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
Ignorance of this magnitude will eventually put national security at risk.
There are still people who believe the earth is flat. Ignorance and stupidity have probably been around as long as man has walked the earth.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
and there are people who believe the earth is only 6,000 years old, and that Adam and Eve put saddles on the dinosaurs in the Garden of Eden and rode them.
Yep, that's what I'm talking about. It just seems that now they get a whole lot of air time to show us just how ignorant or stubborn they are. I mean as long as they don't get mean, they are kind of funny.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
That's what I thought she said and I ask about it in a comment up thread. At first I thought she said the umpire's new clothing.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
I just saw you pounced on that first. There was something else she said too but I can NOT go back a look for it. I just could not do that to myself. No way.
There aren't enough guns that could be held to my head to make me listen to that again.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
Seems she's been reading (or not!) the wrong Scandinavian 19th century author.
Perhaps less H.C. Andersen and more Ibsen is in order. Particularily "An Enemy of the People". The story about how a doctor tries to warn a town against an environmental hazard, but since vested economic interests are against him the politicians won't listen and an irrational hysteric mob of people turns against him.
Sound familiar?
This was posted in a thread on a Forum I'm a member of. It's in regards to Obama and reinstating limits on logging in Oregon. As a
I'm pretty sure that's what a lot of these people think
disclaimer the following comment is not mine nor does it at all express my views, it was posted in a forum I'm a member of.
Originally posted by: 4Christ
Environmentalists don't understand. This Earth was given to MAN by God to do whatever he wants to it until Christ returns.
Who cares if it damages the environment? By the time it's a problem, Christ will have returned and we'll be taken to paradise.
That's kind like, Kill them all and let god sort them out.
That guy or girl better hope he or she isn't around when his christ returns because if his christ does return, I have a feeling he's is gonna be one pissed dude
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
One was on a website for that 'Quiverfull' group, a woman wrote that she didn't worry about her kids getting corrupted at public school because they would be raptured, so who needs an education?
I pledge allegiance to the Constitution of the United States of America, and to the republic which it established, one nation from many peoples, promising liberty and justice for all
Most people in that movement don't have their kids in school at all. I taught mine at home (for other, secular reasons) but knew many families who homeschooled to keep their kids away from the poisonous influence of the "government schools." Back when I homeschooled, families who kept having kids didn't have a NAME for themselves like "Quiverful" but they did have magazines, newsletters, etc. They are intent on having MORE children than non-fundamentalists as a way to take over the world. That is really true; I lived amongst them; my children attended a co-op with these families. My grown children are establishing their careers or are still in college, while their old homeschooling peers are already cranking out the babies.
Ugh, that attitude disgusts me. Yeah, we were given dominion, but they forget that what ever God gives to a person, said person is supposed to be a steward of it, meaning to take care of it as best as possible. Christians are not supposed to rape and pillage the earth. Not only is it being a bad steward, but it also disregards the human suffering that will take place as a result of being a bad steward.
Sometime I am ashamed to be associated with Christianity because of these people.
You don't have to turn into an atheist if that's not what you believe. Just reject Christianity.
You could always switch to Islam. The Koran seems to hate imbalances in the Earth.
I shudder to think the surcharges we're going to get for damages when we have to return it...
Maybe these idiots did not bother reading the fine print?
our bodies were also given to use by god, so we can do as we please with them. So these fundies should have no issue with people getting abortions, or requesting euthanasia... since it is their damn bodies as given to them by god to do as they please. Right?
Great point, "Tyler"!
I never understood why Christian fundies go on and on about abortion, since God commands his followers to smash infants against the rocks several times in the Old Testament . . . is that "Pro-Life?" Taking babies and hurling their heads against boulders? IMHO, Christians should just shut up about what God thinks about babies at any stage.
I read this phrase on a blog long ago but it fits this woman perfectly: "Weapons Grade Stupidium"
This woman's voice makes fingernails on a blackboard sound like music. I couldn't even listen to the whole thing, my ears will hurt for a week now!
I am making an indigestion of stupidity...
When she talks about dinosaurs, does she means the ones that lived with Adam and Eve?
... explain the melting ice caps?
Oh, wait, facts and truth and empirical evidence don't mean anything to her ilk.
Stupid people everywhere. They're out there, and they breed -- and vote.
It's a Palinbot!
BID
"... but definition is the most important thing we understand"
"The Definition of global warming is under false pretense!"
Also note how she rants about "invisible" gases, as if the fact that you can't see CO2 means it has no effect on our atmosphere.
She almost makes Miss Teen Louisiana (whoever that was...such as , like, therefore) sound coherent.
Also. And such as.
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust.
if you applied this line of reasoning to God, then God would have no effect?
There is a loud portion of the population that would love to go back to the Dark Ages. I don't know which is more sad: the fact they would like to live in the Dark Ages out of pure ignorance or that they're so vocal about their ignorance...
Global Warming....Global Warming....Global Warming....
What do I think?
Well, I am hardly an expert in this matter so I need to refrain from making any conclusive statement over this issue.....
I do think that there are significant environmental issues to be discussed. For instance, dropping bombs and white phosphorous does GREAT DAMAGE to the planet and the environment. For example, U.S.-led bombs in Iraq has led to the pollution and environmental degradation of the Tigris River. Spills at nuclear sites also does not improve the environment but adds to its degradation.....
Conclusive statements that "global warming does not exist" by right wingers is to be expected. Don't be alarmed, though, because most right wingers enjoy jerking their knees up to their chins....
The environmental effects of war is nowhere NEAR the threat posed by global warming. And a global threat is never comparable to local ones, regardless.
Add to that you're simply wrong. Explosives are often toxic, but not after they've detonated. It's inherent to their nature- Explosives are unstable, chemically reactive compounds. The products of the explosion are stable and relatively inert. White phosphorus burns to eventually produce harmless phosphoric acid. You release more phosphorus into nature through your use of a couple boxes of laundry detergent than a bomb does.
The main ecological problem posed by war doesn't come from the munitions themselves, it comes from debris and fall-out caused by the things they destroy. Sewage treatment plants, for instance.
Weapons kill and destroy....Life....Human life and the Natural environment...Sorry.....And your personal attacks are quite "flattering" but something I expect on blogs such as this one from people with nothing better to do and who cannot see the forest through the trees......Weapons like the ones used in Iraq did destroy the Iraqi environment and infrastructure, much to your dismay....you're the one grasping at straws....here.
I am sorry, but, I disagree with you. Weapons are very sophisticated these days and many weapons carry nuclear weapons ingredients within it. So, I am not sure I can agree with you here.
When bombs strike, for example pipelines, it causes spills of oil which pollute the Tigris. To say that the release of bombs and other weapons do not adversely harm the environment or totally destroy life....well....you get it.....
Be argumentative with someone else cause I am not here to get into pissing contests....
As a matter of fact I am tired of the troublemakers on blogs like this, which includes yourself....
You know what I am addressing here, but you choose to be a jerk. Ask the people of Japan what the Atom Bombs did to their country, people and environment....
Ever hear of bunker busters? You think those nuclear weapons have ZERO IMPOACT on Environmental degradation?
Going by your musings, dropping bombs is no different than the release of laundry detergent? Okay....whatever...Are you a scientist? Please, already.....
say that none of these things are bad? Or that any of them are good?
Alexdem clearly agreed with much of what you were saying. Reread:
And then Alexdem simply refuted the point you brought up about white phosporous, his (or her) point being that seemingly innocuous chemicals like those in laundry detergent do much more damage to the global enviroment in the long term than does white phosphorous, damage that threatens the existence of ours and many other species.
The fact that you didn't mention nuclear weapons, but specified white phosphorous, is on you.
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust.
I did not attack you personally anywhere. I said what you said was wrong.
I'm grasping at straws you say? At least I supported my statements.
> Weapons are very sophisticated these days and many weapons carry nuclear weapons ingredients within it.
You're referring to depleted uranium then? Well, first off - depleted uranium is not a nuclear weapons 'ingredient', since it's depleted. That means 'not fissile'. Which means it's not useful for a nuclear weapon by definition. There have been legitimate concerns about the use of depleted uranium in weapons, but those are centered on the chemical toxicity of uranium, not radiation damage. Conflating depleted uranium with nuclear weapons is factually inaccurate and essentially guilt-by-association. Also, those are projectile weapons - not bombs. You wrote about bombs and white phosphorus, so that's what I answered to. Don't change the subject.
> Ask the people of Japan what the Atom Bombs did to their country, people and environment....
What the hell does that have to do with anything?
> Ever hear of bunker busters? You think those nuclear weapons have ZERO IMPOACT on Environmental degradation?
So called 'bunker-buster' bombs used in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are not nuclear weapons. And I never said any weapons had zero impact. I said they themselves have negligible impact compared to what we're producing through ordinary consumption and production. How many tons of bombs were dropped on Iraq and how many tons of landfill have we produced in that time?
> Going by your musings, dropping bombs is no different than the release of laundry detergent?
The phosphorus emissions from detergents is a major environmental concern. It leads to the eutrophication (over-fertilization) of aquatic ecosystems. And the emissions from consumer detergents is definitely a lot bigger than that from phosphorus bombs. Go google 'phosphorus detergent' and you'll find lots of info about it. (The biggest pollutant is agriculture though.)
You decided to criticize war on the grounds that it's bad for the environment. I'm saying the impact negligible and that you're wrong about many of the things you're claiming. That does not mean I defend war. It means that I think the environment is too important an issue to allow the debate to be hijacked with irrelevant nonsense like this when there are much more significant things that need dealing with.
>Are you a scientist? Please, already.....
As it so happens, yes. I'm a molecular physicist. And I've at least taken some undergraduate courses in ecology. Have you?
.
She spells out K Y O T O L (Treaty)? And she goes on to pronounce it KOTOL and then KEEODLE.
My apologies to the citizens of the island of Honshu, Japan.
This woman couldn't spell CAT if you spotted her the C and the T.
Maybe if you misunderstood the "ahh...." she voiced as she thought about it for an A she could.
I'm just curious how you try to lecture on something when you don't even know what it is you're supposed to be lecturing about.
Can you imagine if they had the EPA back in the dinosaur days, you know, 6,000 years ago.
She actually has the gestures, the articulation of Sarah Palin. Maybe there's a Talk Like Sarah course the wingnut women go to.
She's a Sarah wannabe.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
Is it true that all carbon to be found in organisms and fossil fuel was once CO2 in the atmosphere?
When earth was formed it was formed from atoms of iron, carbon, oxygen, etc, which came from the sun. Originally in the primitive atmosphere there was no free oxygen. It took millions/billions of years for organisms to evolve that convert CO2 into O2. Didn't some early lifeforms / fungus / plants "fix" (utilize) the carbon in the soil and/or oceans rather than get it from the atmosphere?
I suppose it doesn't matter to types like her who don't believe in evolution, but I'm curious to know if ALL the Carbon came from CO2 or some of it came from something else. Thus showing that even her "basic scientific statement" was wrong.
> Is it true that all carbon to be found in organisms and fossil fuel was once CO2 in the atmosphere?
Undoubtedly. Carbon in just about all organisms except perhaps some bacteria ultimately comes from plant photosynthesis. Oil and coal deposits have organic origins.
Not that this is relevant - when all that carbon was in the atmosphere humans weren't around. While humans evolved all this carbon was underground. Then we dug it up and put it back into the atmosphere as heat-absorbing CO2.
>which came from the sun.
Actually, other suns.
> Didn't some early lifeforms / fungus / plants "fix" (utilize) the carbon in the soil and/or oceans rather than get it from the atmosphere?
Well, 'soil' itself requires decayed plant material, which is an accessible form of carbon. Otherwise it's just rock. But rock can be carbonates, so .. I don't know of any carbonate-reducing bacteria though. More the opposite.
> but I'm curious to know if ALL the Carbon came from CO2
I'd say it's probably safe to assume a lot if not most of the carbon in the earth's crust was gas at one point or another. Those white cliffs of Dover? Chalk - Calcium carbonate. Is all carbonates that was once absorbed from the atmosphere by microorganisms.
Bottom line though is that it doesn't really matter. I don't care what carbon levels and climates we've had for 'geological time' - I care about what we've had for 'human time'!
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
-Bertrand Russell
I'm pretty sure it applies to ladies with no comprehension of science trying to explain science as well.
their essence so all can understand them. And Bertrand, my dear, the only absolute is that there are no absolutes. Comprehend that.
click on the YouTube logo on the screen and you'll get it direct from YouTube. And read the comments.
Reassuring.
Isn't it half or more of the US population doesn't "believe" in evolution, but thinks the world was literally created in six days? So why should the craziness coming out of this woman's mouth be a surprise? Our country is full of people who wish we were still living in the Middle Ages, when church ruled all, education and science didn't exist, and nobody questioned anything.
They never do get the "free will" side of the equation.
No kidding, my dog left the room too.
Could she have had too much CO2 in the whomb to make her vocal cords so mutated?
This kind of stupid needs to come with a Surgeon General's warning on it. "Overexposure to concentrated stupid can result in head injuries (beating your head against your keyboard), shortness of breath (I'm at a loss for words), and vomiting (I think I'm going to be sick.)"
Decomposed perhaps? I can't take this much stoopid without drinking heavily...
"Parachutes are allowed in checked or carry-on baggage, but may not be worn in flight."
---Southwest Airlines
That's 4 minutes and 44 seconds of my life I will never get back. 4 minutes and 44 seconds of such monstrous stupidity. Jesus! My ears are bleeding!
If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders.
George Carlin
And, coming from South Dakota, she'll probably work on the cheap, too.
"Parachutes are allowed in checked or carry-on baggage, but may not be worn in flight."
---Southwest Airlines
Find out who Carmen D. Oxide is and problem solved.
My first big laugh of the night. Touche.
But didn't she say from the beginning of Life? Photo synthesis. Plant life?
My guess is she's not a creationist. Nawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.
She's just denser than a rock.
What is your conceptual, continuity?
that she might just win the republican nomination, which normally goes to the most unintelligent psycho candidate. Her chances are great among those who don't read, believe that Africa is a country and listen to Nugent. Palin better open her eyes.
This picture sums it up nicely:
http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u264/spont...
put her in a box w/nothing but co2
the lightheadedness might cause the concept to sink in, 'cus it ain't the regular way
also
Kay-why-oto (the 'L' is silent i guess)
"Carbon Dee-Oxide." At first I thought Hee Haw, and, well, I guess I was right on that point. It's funny how these idiots always think shouting loud is a means of validation.
Why no transcript? Stay away from cows?
Tax the CO2 out of a cow's butt?
All invisible gases are natural?
Please make a transcript, this is classic.
Koto protocol?
This is the celebration of ignorance that Bush presided over.
Lika we yoosah to say inna de Vatican, "You justa can'ta make theesa sheet up, eh". -Father Guido Sarducci
"I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative.”
- John Stuart Mill
Texas in State of Emergency due to drought.. 12,000 cows dead and human's are threatened.
http://www.wired.com/beyond_the_beyond/2009/0...
She should just put a hose connecting from her exhaust to her interior of her vehicle to prove there is nothing to worry about. She seems to believe shes smarter than every one else.
If you want proof for climate change speak to farmers who are burdened financially the hardest spending obscene amounts to stay afloat.
My proposal to aid farmers allowing to grow 2.5-7.5% marijuana maximum of total land owned (with an absolute cap on plant amount) to get them off of government guarantee's and subsidies. Along with the remaining 90-95% required being food products. Which would prevent monopolies like Phillip Morris and company from cornering the market. I've sent my Senator's my proposal and I suggest others do the same. Doing so would prove Liberals can be conservative reducing government costs (subsidies) and providing new revenue sources which are normally not taxed.
Also, from what I've heard.. the stems and leaves make great hog feed additives. :)
Another uneducated Reslug, street walker, grabbed and shoved in front of a camera to spew proven ignorant lies.
What a voice. The mic's there for a reason, lady.
who's the person who made me listen to that?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_CAs3q7G48
Deeply.
What a steaming heap!
Coming out of the solar minimum with the lowest radiation in 100 years as we are, and looking at Venus our sister planet with its 96% predominate Co2 atmosphere and listening to this dumbass speak is almost to much.
Isn't it methane that comes out of a cow's rear end? Or is a combination of gases? Or does methane chemically change to CO2 at some point?
If a drone kills a child in Kandahar, do the crying parents make a sound?
She could do those old Miller Lite commercials with Norm Crosby, the king of malapropisms.
Republican Science Textbook:
CO2 is created by the decompression of plant matter.
Man rode Dinosaurs to work 4000 years ago.
Scientists are really communists and cannot be trusted
Gee, after listening to her, everything becomes so simple and clear!
We shouldn't worry about global warming, because we can always cause a nuclear winter.
OK, just listened to the first two words she spouted. That's all I could take.
First of all...referring to anyone as a "teabagger" is abnoxious and mean spirited. Yes, this lady was shrill and not totally up on her facts - but herein lies the problem: When there are two sides to an argument and one side REFUSES TO DEBATE, then you are left with name calling and sketchy facts. Remember, science is NEVER stated as fact without rigorous debate. So what we are left with is people relying on Hollywood stars, with not much education, and a marginal thinker like Al Gore. Real scientists declined to enter the fray when it first hit the public airways. I'm sure they thought it not worth their time...until...falsehoods and improbable computer models became the order of the day. Now, it is somewhat like catching the cow after leaving the barn door open.
Former UN IPCC Japanese scientist, Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD in environmental physical chemistry says:
WARMING FEARS ARE THE WORST SCIENTIFIC SCANDAL IN HISTORY...WHEN PEOPLE COME TO KNOW WHAT THE TRUTH IS, THEY WILL FEEL DECEIVED BY SCIENCE AND SCIENTISTS.
There are thousands of additional notable Ph.D.'s who agree with Dr. Itoh. So, by making fun of this woman you demean the whole Global Warming issue. If you want to rail at something - show your disgust by protesting the lack of scientific debate. Gore has been challenged to debate several times now and to bring on his best scientists - he refuses. How can you place your trust in someone who says - like a used car salesman - "just trust me." Remember, it is Gore who stands to make millions, perhaps billions if Cap and Trade is passed. Don't you find this to be a conflict of interest? I certainly do.
Most importantly to this discussion - "CO2 is not a pollutant. CO2 is plant food. The green world around us would disappear if not for atmospheric CO2." John Christy, Ph.D. and Professor of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alabama.
DON'T CONFUSE CO2 WITH CARBON MONOXIDE, WHICH IS REGULATED BY THE CLEAN AIR ACT OF 1970.
There are not "thousands" of additional notable Ph.D.'s who think that "warming fears are the worst scientific scandal in history."
A meta-analysis was just published at the end of June, obscured by Michael Jackson's death, putting all of you global-warming deniers out of business.
Venus and Mars have excess CO2, and there is an abundance of life... oh, wait...
Comments are closed on this entry